Demencias

Demencias
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:确定在医疗程序合法的国家中,安乐死和协助自杀最常见的神经系统疾病,以及其中一些疾病中安乐死的具体特征,并显示安乐死的演变数字。
    方法:我们进行了系统的文献综述。
    结果:痴呆症,运动神经元病,多发性硬化症,和帕金森氏病是神经系统疾病,最常见的激发请求安乐死或协助自杀。与痴呆症相关的索赔构成了最大的群体,正在成长,并提出额外的道德和法律问题,由于这些患者的决策能力下降。在一些国家,安乐死要求与所有多发性硬化症病例的比率,运动神经元病,或亨廷顿病高于任何其他疾病。
    结论:癌症后,神经系统疾病是请求安乐死或协助自杀的最常见原因。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the neurological diseases for which euthanasia and assisted suicide are most frequently requested in the countries where these medical procedures are legal and the specific characteristics of euthanasia in some of these diseases, and to show the evolution of euthanasia figures.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review.
    RESULTS: Dementia, motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson\'s disease are the neurological diseases that most frequently motivate requests for euthanasia or assisted suicide. Requests related to dementia constitute the largest group, are growing, and raise additional ethical and legal issues due to these patients\' diminished decision-making capacity. In some countries, the ratios of euthanasia requests to all cases of multiple sclerosis, motor neuron disease, or Huntington disease are higher than for any other disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: After cancer, neurological diseases are the most frequent reason for requesting euthanasia or assisted suicide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床单位推荐对脑脊液(CSF)中阿尔茨海默病(AD)的核心生物标志物进行分析。由于缺乏普遍的验证值,建议确定每个中心及其人口的具体截止点。CORCOBIA研究的主要目的是确定几个中心的核心ADCSF生物标志物的临界点(ParcdeSalutMar,BarcelonaandHospitalGeneraldeGranollers),与相同的参考实验室(加泰罗尼亚实验室)一起工作。
    方法:包括认知健康受试者的前瞻性研究(HC,n=42),患有遗忘型轻度认知障碍的受试者(aMCI,n=35)和因阿尔茨海默病引起的痴呆患者(AD,n=48),其中临床和神经心理学评估,神经影像学,APOE基因分型和腰椎穿刺分析淀粉样β肽(Aβ42,Aβ40),使用LumipulseG600II(Fujirebio)进行总tau(tTau)和磷酸化Tau(pTau181)。灵敏度(Se)的值,特异性(Sp),计算预测值和曲线下面积(AUC),通过比较HC和AD组,根据Youden指数确定临界点。
    结果:所得截止值及其AUC如下:Aβ42750pg/ml(AUC0.809);Aβ42/Aβ400.062(AUC0.78);pTau18169.85pg/ml(AUC0.81);tTau522.0pg/ml(AUC0.79);Aβ42/Tau1.76(10.C)
    结论:确定参与中心的核心ADCSF生物标志物的截止点可以获得更好的诊断准确性。CSFAβ42/pTau181的比率显示出最高的AUC以及灵敏度和特异性之间的更好平衡。
    BACKGROUND: The analysis of the core biomarkers of Alzheimer\'s Disease (AD) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is recommended in the clinical units where it is available. Because of the absence of universal validated values, the determination of specific cut-off points for each center and its population is recommended. The main objective of the CORCOBIA study was to determine the cut-off points of core AD CSF biomarkers for several centers (Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona and Hospital General de Granollers), which work with the same reference laboratory (Laboratori de Referència de Catalunya).
    METHODS: Prospective study including cognitively unimpaired individuals (CU, n = 42), subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, n = 35) and patients with dementia due to Alzheimer\'s Disease (AD, n = 48), in whom clinical and neuropsychological assessment, neuroimaging, APOE genotyping and lumbar puncture to analyse amyloid beta peptides (Aβ42, Aβ40), total tau (tTau) and phosphorylated Tau (pTau181) using the Lumipulse G600II (Fujirebio) was performed. The values of sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), predictive values and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated, determining the cut-off point according to the Youden index by comparing the CU and AD groups.
    RESULTS: The resulting cut-offs and their AUC were the following: Aβ42 750 pg/mL (AUC 0.809); Aβ42/Aβ40 0.062 (AUC 0.78); pTau181 69.85 pg/mL (AUC 0.81); tTau 522.0 pg/mL (AUC 0.79); Aβ42/tTau 1.76 (AUC 0.86); Aβ42/pTau181 10.25 (AUC 0.86).
    CONCLUSIONS: The determination of cut-off points of core AD CSF biomarkers for the participating centers allows a better diagnostic accuracy. The ratio CSF Aβ42/pTau181 shows the highest AUC and better balance between sensitivity and specificity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定在医疗程序合法的国家中,安乐死和协助自杀最常见的神经系统疾病,以及其中一些疾病中安乐死的具体特征,并显示安乐死的演变数字。
    方法:我们进行了系统的文献综述。
    结果:痴呆症,运动神经元病,多发性硬化症,和帕金森氏病是神经系统疾病,最常见的激发请求安乐死或协助自杀。与痴呆症相关的索赔构成了最大的群体,正在成长,并提出额外的道德和法律问题,由于这些患者的决策能力下降。在一些国家,安乐死要求与所有多发性硬化症病例的比率,运动神经元病,或亨廷顿病高于任何其他疾病。
    结论:癌症后,神经系统疾病是请求安乐死或协助自杀的最常见原因。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the neurological diseases for which euthanasia and assisted suicide are most frequently requested in the countries where these medical procedures are legal and the specific characteristics of euthanasia in some of these diseases, and to show the evolution of euthanasia figures.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review.
    RESULTS: Dementia, motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson\'s disease are the neurological diseases that most frequently motivate requests for euthanasia or assisted suicide. Claims related to dementia constitute the largest group, are growing, and raise additional ethical and legal issues due to these patients\' diminished decision-making capacity. In some countries, the ratios of euthanasia requests to all cases of multiple sclerosis, motor neuron disease, or Huntington disease are higher than for any other disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: After cancer, neurological diseases are the most frequent reason for requesting euthanasia or assisted suicide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:老年人群是受COVID-19威胁最大的群体,死亡率最高。这项研究旨在分析一组退行性痴呆患者中COVID-19的病死率。
    方法:我们对被诊断为原发性神经退行性痴呆的患者样本进行了描述性病例对照研究。
    结果:纳入研究的88例COVID-19患者中有24例死亡:10/23(43.4%)被诊断为痴呆症的患者和14/65(21.5%)的对照组;这种差异具有统计学意义。
    结论:我们的结果表明,原发性退行性痴呆患者的COVID-19病死率明显高于其他具有相似平均年龄和合并症的患者。
    BACKGROUND: The elderly population is the group most threatened by COVID-19, with the highest mortality rates. This study aims to analyse the case fatality of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with degenerative dementia.
    METHODS: We conducted a descriptive case-control study of a sample of patients diagnosed with primary neurodegenerative dementia.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four of the 88 patients with COVID-19 included in the study died: 10/23 (43.4%) patients diagnosed with dementia and 14/65 (21.5%) controls; this difference was statistically significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that case fatality of COVID-19 is significantly higher among patients with primary degenerative dementia than in other patients with similar mean ages and comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological interventions are often the subject of debate in the scientific field. Therefore, it is essential to know the attitudes that health professionals have towards the novel Doll Therapy in Dementia (DTD). The objective of this study was to design and validate two questionnaires to find out the attitudes and knowledge on DTD in health professionals.
    METHODS: A total of 120 Spanish-speaking Geriatrics and Gerontology professionals, with a mean age of 38.3 years (DT = 10.99), participated, mostly women (88.3%). A questionnaire (TCM_DEMCO) on knowledge about the DTD and a questionnaire (TCM_DEMAC) on attitudes towards the DTD were designed and applied. The construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis, and reliability was calculated using Cronbach\'s α.
    RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis of the TCM_DEMCO questionnaire retained 10 items in 5 factors (\"environment and dementia\", \"therapeutic application\", \"activities\", \"methodology\" and \"benefits and implications\") that explained 70.1% of the total variability, giving a Cronbach α coefficient value > 0.50. The exploratory factor analysis of the TCM_DEMAC questionnaire retained 10 items in two factors (\"positive attitudes\" and \"negative attitudes\") that explained 61.2% of the total variability, giving a Cronbach α value > 0.85.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both questionnaires are a brief tool to learn about the attitudes and knowledge of Spanish-speaking Geriatrics and Gerontology professionals in matters of DTD. The reliability and validity analyses performed showed good psychometric properties of these tools.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Non-pharmacological therapies are currently one of the cornerstones of the prevention of the possible causes of cognitive impairment. Among other topics, the present article discusses the importance of identifying and working with elements such as a person\'s life history, interests, values, beliefs, and personal tastes and preferences and of combining them with techniques with proven effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) will double in the next 20 years, making early detection a key priority.
    OBJECTIVE: Validation of a 5-minute CI screening test.
    METHODS: Adults aged 60 and older were recruited from memory clinics and the community at large in the Santiago, Chile metropolitan area. Based on clinical examination they were categorised as No CI (NCI), Mild CI (MCI) and dementia sufferers (DS). We measured the validity of a new test, MEFO, evaluating memory (5 points), phonetic verbal fluency (2 points) and orientation (6 points) by comparing its results with those from the MMSE.
    RESULTS: We evaluated 214 subjects, comprising 49 with dementia, 47 with MCI, and 118 with no CI. The MEFO differentiated between all 3 groups whereas the MMSE did not discriminate between the MCI and NCI groups. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the MEFO distinguishing NCI subjects from dementia sufferers was 0.97; for NCI vs CI (dementia+MCI), 0.89; and for NCI vs MCI, 0.80. On the MMSE these values were 0.95, 0.84, and 0.73, respectively. A cut-off score of 6/7 on the MEFO identified dementia sufferers with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 96%. A cut-off score of 8/9 distinguished CI from NCI subjects with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 75%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The MEFO is a valid and reliable test for discriminating between dementia and CI sufferers and subjects with no CI. Its validity is similar to that the MMSE under these conditions, but it is more effective for identifying subjects with MCI and its administration time is shorter.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号