目的:PARP抑制剂(PARPi),他拉索帕尼(BMN673),有效和特异性放射增敏癌细胞。放射敏化是由电离辐射(IR)诱导的DNA双链断裂(DSB)向不依赖PARP1的修复转移介导的,替代端连接(alt-EJ)。DNA聚合酶theta(Polθ)是这种不依赖PARP1的alt-EJ途径的关键组成部分,我们在此表明其抑制可以进一步使talazoparib处理的细胞辐射敏感。本工作的目的是探索在HR丰富的癌细胞中通过Polθ抑制剂增强的talazoparib放射增敏作用的机制和动力学。
方法:对PARPis的放射增敏,talazoparib,奥拉帕利,rucaparib和veliparib通过克隆形成的存活率进行评估。用PARPis和/或用Polθ抑制剂ART558或新生霉素处理Polθ丰富和缺乏的细胞。通过使用siRNA下调CtIP和MRE11表达来研究DNA末端切除的作用。通过对γH2AX病灶评分评估DSB修复。使用G2特异性细胞遗传学分析评估染色体异常的形成作为alt-EJ功能的证据。
结果:Talazoparib发挥了明显的放射增敏作用,在测试的癌细胞系中有所不同;然而,在正常细胞中无法检测到放射致敏作用.其他常用的PARPis,奥拉帕利,在我们的条件下,veliparib或rucaparib是无效的放射增敏剂。尽管对Pole的遗传消融或药理学抑制仅轻度放射致敏的癌细胞,talazoparib处理的细胞明显进一步放射增敏。机械上,talazoparib通过以CtIP和MRE11依赖性方式增强DNA末端切除,将DSB分流到Polθ依赖性alt-EJ-在低,但不是高IR剂量。暴露于Pole抑制剂的talazoparib处理的细胞中的染色体易位分析表明,PARP1-和Pole依赖性alt-EJ途径可以补充,但也互相备份。
结论:我们建议talazoparib促进低剂量,CtIP/MRE11依赖性切除,并增加了对辐照的HR高的癌细胞的依赖性,关于Polθ介导的alt-EJ。Pole抑制剂与talazoparib的组合抑制了这种选择并导致进一步的放射增敏。结果表明,可以利用Polθ抑制来最大程度地提高临床上HR高肿瘤的talazoparib放射敏感性。
OBJECTIVE: The PARP inhibitor (PARPi), Talazoparib (BMN673), effectively and specifically radiosensitizes cancer cells. Radiosensitization is mediated by a shift in the repair of ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) toward PARP1-independent, alternative end-joining (alt-EJ). DNA polymerase theta (Polθ) is a key component of this PARP1-independent alt-EJ pathway and we show here that its inhibition can further radiosensitize talazoparib-treated cells. The purpose of the present work is to explore mechanisms and dynamics underpinning enhanced talazoparib radiosensitization by Polθ inhibitors in HR-proficient cancer cells.
METHODS: Radiosensitization to PARPis, talazoparib, olaparib, rucaparib and veliparib was assessed by clonogenic survival. Polθ-proficient and -deficient cells were treated with PARPis and/or with the Polθ inhibitors ART558 or novobiocin. The role of DNA end-resection was studied by down-regulating CtIP and MRE11 expression using siRNAs. DSB repair was assessed by scoring γH2AX foci. The formation of chromosomal abnormalities was assessed as evidence of alt-EJ function using G2-specific cytogenetic analysis.
RESULTS: Talazoparib exerted pronounced radiosensitization that varied among the tested cancer cell lines; however, radiosensitization was undetectable in normal cells. Other commonly used PARPis, olaparib, veliparib, or rucaparib were ineffective radiosensitizers under our experimental conditions. Although genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of Polθ only mildly radiosensitized cancer cells, talazoparib-treated cells were markedly further radiosensitized. Mechanistically, talazoparib shunted DSBs to Polθ-dependent alt-EJ by enhancing DNA end-resection in a CtIP- and MRE11-dependent manner - an effect detectable at low, but not high IR doses. Chromosomal translocation analysis in talazoparib-treated cells exposed to Polθ inhibitors suggested that PARP1- and Polθ-dependent alt-EJ pathways may complement, but also back up each other.
CONCLUSIONS: We propose that talazoparib promotes low-dose, CtIP/MRE11-dependent resection and increases the reliance of irradiated HR-proficient cancer cells, on Polθ-mediated alt-EJ. The combination of Polθ inhibitors with talazoparib suppresses this option and causes further radiosensitization. The results suggest that Polθ inhibition may be exploited to maximize talazoparib radiosensitization of HR-proficient tumors in the clinic.