There is a growing need to implement high quality chronic care to address the global burden of chronic conditions. However, to our knowledge, there have been no systematic attempts to define and specify aims for chronic care quality. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review and Delphi survey to establish and validate comprehensive specifications. The Institute of Medicine\'s (IOM) quality of care definition and aims were used as the foundation. We purposively selected articles from the scientific (n=48) and grey literature (n=26). We sought papers that acknowledged and unpacked the plurality of quality in chronic care and proposed or utilised frameworks, studied their implementation, or investigated at least two IOM quality care aims and implementation. Articles were analysed both deductively and inductively. The findings were validated through a Delphi survey involving 49 international chronic care experts with varied knowledge of, and experience in, low-and-middle-income countries. Considering the natural history of chronic conditions and the journey of a person with a chronic condition, we defined and identified the aims of chronic care quality. The six IOM aims apply with specific meanings. We identified a seventh aim, continuity, which relates to the issue of chronicity. The group endorsed our specifications and several participants gave contextualised interpretations and concrete examples. Chronic conditions pose specific challenges underscoring the relevance of tailoring quality of care aims. The next steps require a tailored definition and specific aims to improve, measure and assure the quality of chronic care.
Main findings: While previously defined aims of good-quality care may also apply to chronic care quality, the nature of chronic conditions and ensuing healthcare needs warrant specifications for good-quality chronic care.Added knowledge: Our proposed definition and specific aims are tailored to the natural history of chronic conditions, and can serve as a guide on determining what can be deemed as good-quality chronic care.Global health impact for policy and action: This work, developed to guide further work on designing purchasing instruments to improve quality of chronic care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, may also be a source of inspiration for other interventions aiming at improving quality of chronic care.

The number of elderly and senile patients who are in need of surgical care delivery is growing steadily year over year. This category of patients is characterized by comorbidity, polypragmasy and high prevalence of geriatric syndromes including loss of autonomy, malnutrition and cognitive impairments that increase the risk of developing perioperative complications. Management of these patients at all stages requires a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach. Nevertheless, there is no uniform understanding of solution of this problem at present. Determination of consensus on certain issues using the Delphi method will allow to gather and unite expert opinions. In this regard, the working group formulated the main points of management of elderly and senile patients before, during and after surgical treatment and conducted a cross-sectional analysis of experts\' opinions.
Ежегодно число пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста, нуждающихся в оказании хирургической помощи, неуклонно растет. Данная категория пациентов характеризуется коморбидностью, полипрагмазией и высоким распространением гериатрических синдромов, включая утрату автономности, мальнутрицию и когнитивные нарушения, которые увеличивают риски развития периоперационных осложнений. Ведение этих пациентов на всех этапах требует комплексного мультидисциплинарного подхода. Однако в настоящее время нет единого понимания решения данной задачи. Достижение консенсуса по отдельным вопросам с использованием метода Дельфи позволит собрать и объединить мнение экспертов. С этой целью рабочей группой были сформулированы основные тезисы ведения пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста до, во время и после хирургического лечения и проведен поперечный срез мнений экспертов.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension, a chronic medical condition affecting millions of people worldwide, is a leading cause of cardiovascular diseases. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to reduce the burden of the disease, with general practitioners playing a vital role. Therefore, it is crucial that GPs provide high-quality care that is standardized and based on the most recent European guidelines. Quality indicators (QIs) can be used to assess the performance, outcomes, or processes of healthcare delivery and are critical in helping healthcare professionals identify areas of improvement and measure progress towards achieving desired health outcomes. However, QIs to evaluate the care of patients with hypertension in general practice have been studied to a limited extent. The aim of our study is to define quality indicators for hypertension in general practice that are extractable from the electronic health record (EHR) and can be used to evaluate and improve the quality of care for hypertensive patients in the general practice setting.
METHODS: We used a Rand-modified Delphi procedure. We extracted recommendations from European guidelines and assembled them into an online questionnaire. An initial scoring based on the SMART principle and extractability from the EHR was performed by panel members, these results were analyzed using a Median Likert score, prioritization and degree of consensus. A consensus meeting was set up in which all the recommendations were discussed, followed by a final validation round.
RESULTS: Our study extracted 115 recommendations. After analysis of the online questionnaire round and a consensus meeting round, 37 recommendations were accepted and 75 were excluded. Of these 37 recommendations, 9 were slightly modified and 4 were combined into 2 recommendations, resulting in a list of 35 recommendations. All recommendations of the final set were translated to QIs, made up of 7 QIs on screening, 6 QIs on diagnosis, 11 QIs on treatment, 5 QIs on outcome and 6 QIs on follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study resulted in a set of 35 QIs for hypertension in general practice. These QIs, tailored to the Belgian EHR, provide a robust foundation for automated audit and feedback and could substantially benefit other countries if adapted to their systems.

Aromatase inhibitors have been widely used to improve height in the world and China. However, due to their off-label use and relatively short application time, there is a lack of consistent understanding and expert consensus on the indications, efficacy, and side effects of the drugs at home and abroad. Therefore, the Growth and Development and Gonadal Diseases Committee of Chinese Aging Well Association and the Adolescent Medicine and Health Professional Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized 28 domestic experts in growth and development, based on the clinical evidence level classification and recommendation level of the Oxford University Evidence-Based Medicine Center to establish some preliminary recommendations on the efficacy, adverse reactions, precautions, dosage, and course of use of aromatase inhibitors in treating children with short stature and improving their year-end height. Combined with the Delphi method evaluation, 14 recommendations were finally formulated to standardized the clinical application of aromatase inhibitors in improving adolescent height.
芳香化酶抑制剂在全球和中国都广泛应用于改善身高，但因属于超适应证用药，且应用时间相对较短，故国内外对用药的适应证、疗效、不良反应缺乏一致的认识和专家共识。因此中国老年保健协会生长发育和性腺疾病分会和中国医师协会青春期医学与健康专业委员会组织国内28位生长发育方面专家，以牛津大学循证医学中心临床证据水平分级和推荐级别为参照，围绕芳香化酶抑制剂治疗儿童矮身材、改善成年终身高的疗效、不良反应、注意事项、使用剂量和用药疗程等问题，筛选出初步推荐意见。再结合德尔菲法评价意见最终确定14条推荐意见，以规范芳香化酶抑制剂改善青少年身高的临床应用。.

BACKGROUND: Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is a multi-disciplinary approach of generating health system and policy-level evidence. Setting HPSR agendas is considered as an efficient strategy to map and identify policy and cost-effective research topics, but its practice in developing countries is limited. This paper aimed to conduct a collaborative health policy and system research priority-setting exercise in Ethiopia.
METHODS: The WHO\'s plan, implement, publish, and evaluate (PIPE) framework and the Delphi technique were used to conduct the priority-setting exercise. The PIPE model was used to lead the priority-setting process from planning to evaluation, while the Delphi technique was used to run the rating and ranking exercise with the aim of reaching a consensus. Two rounds of expert panel workshops supplemented with an online survey were used for the HPSR agenda setting, rating and ranking purposes. Groups were formed using the WHO health system building blocks as a base framework to identify and prioritize the HPSR topics.
RESULTS: Under 8 themes, 32 sub-themes and 182 HPSR topics were identified. The identified research themes include leadership management and governance, health policy, health information system, healthcare financing, human resource for health, medical products and supply, service delivery and cross-cutting issues.
CONCLUSIONS: Priority HPSR topics focussing on national health priority issues were identified. The identified topics were shared with policymakers and academic and research institutions. Evidence generation on the identified priority topics will guide future research endeavours and improve evidence-informed decision-making practice, health system performance and national health goals and targets.

BACKGROUND: Promoting mental health, preventing and treating mental disorders are critically important in public health, and many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluate intervention strategies for these objectives. However, distinguishing promotion from prevention and from treatment RCTs is challenging. A tool to place studies along the promotion-to-treatment continuum in mental health research does not exist, leaving it to researchers and policymakers to decide on how to classify individual RCTs, which hinders evidence synthesis.
METHODS: We present a protocol for the development of a new tool to assist researchers in distinguishing RCTs along the promotion-to-treatment continuum. We will establish a Tool Development Group, and use the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome framework to define constructs. We will generate, define, categorise and reduce the items in the tool using qualitative methods, including cognitive interviews and a Delphi exercise. Psychometric evaluation-including unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity and item homogeneity-will include data collection, scoring, internal consistency checks and factor analysis of the tool\'s indicators for available RCTs. We will use standard Cohen\'s kappa statistics to assess the reliability of the tool.
BACKGROUND: This study involves data collection from the already published literature. However, this protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of the Università della Svizzera Italiana (CE 2024 04). The results of the present project will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international and national scientific meetings. Training materials for the application of the tool will also be developed and disseminated to the scientific community. The tool and all related implementation materials will be published on a website and will be freely accessible to the public.

BACKGROUND: There has been a significant expansion in the measurement of healthcare system performance. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive performance measurement framework to assess the effects of telephone triage services on the urgent care system. The aim of our Delphi study was to construct and validate a performance measurement framework designed explicitly for telephone triage services.
METHODS: This study was conducted in Finland with a group of eight experienced senior physicians from the country\'s 20 largest joint emergency departments, serving over 90% of the population for urgent care. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was utilised to achieve consensus on measuring telephone triage performance. Initially, performance indicators (PIs) were identified through Delphi method rounds from December 10th to December 27th, 2021, with eight experts participating, and from December 29th, 2021, to January 23rd, 2022, where five of these experts responded. NGT further deepened these themes and perspectives, aiding in the development of a comprehensive performance measurement framework. The final framework validation began with an initial round from February 13th to March 3rd, 2022, receiving five responses. Due to the limited number of responses, an additional validation round was conducted from October 29th to November 7th, 2023, resulting in two more responses, increasing the total number of respondents in the validation phase to seven.
RESULTS: The study identified a strong desire among professionals to implement a uniform framework for measuring telephone triage performance. The finalised framework evaluates telephone triage across five dimensions: service accessibility, patient experience, quality and safety, process outcome, and cost per case. Eight specific PIs were established, including call response metrics, service utility, follow-up care type and distribution, ICPC-2 classified encounter reasons, patient compliance with follow-up care, medical history review during assessment, and service cost per call.
CONCLUSIONS: This study validated a performance measurement framework for telephone triage services, utilising existing literature and the NGT method. The framework includes five key dimensions: patient experience, quality and safety, outcome of the telephone triage process, cost per case, and eight PIs. It offers a structured and comprehensive approach to measuring the overall performance of telephone triage services, enhancing our ability to evaluate these services effectively.

BACKGROUND: The holistic concept of physical literacy (PL) has gained growing attention in recent research, policy, and practice. Many important policy documents of the physical activity and educational fields (e.g., Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030 by the World Health Organization, UNESCO\'s Quality Physical Education guidelines for policymakers) have specified PL. However, a clear framework for action is needed, as most initiatives across the world are fragmented, lack a prospective orientation, can benefit from conceptual clarification, and are not linked to effective translation into practice. Therefore, we aim to consensually develop a Global Physical Literacy (GloPL) Action Framework to define goals and principles (asking what is needed) as well as actions and ways (asking how these can be achieved) to move PL forward.
METHODS: We apply a three-stage group Delphi technique involving three representation groups: (a) geographical representatives to achieve global coverage of perspectives; (b) representatives of special thematic interest reflecting prominent gaps of current PL activities; and (c) representatives of societies from the broad field of physical activity and health to facilitate dissemination. The process will begin with an individual pre-Delphi exercise, in which experts generate initial ideas for the framework, followed by a four-eye document analysis to derive themes for the discussion. Subsequently, the experts will meet face-to-face in three online rounds to discuss and prioritize the themes. Interspersed formal voting with pre-defined agreement thresholds (via descriptive statistics) will inform the inclusion of themes within the final framework.
CONCLUSIONS: A global consensus on goals, principles, actions, and ways for the development of PL has the potential to provide a largely accepted roadmap for future activities in research, policy, and practice. The co-production approach will help disseminate the GloPL Action Framework and benefit work in relevant application fields of physical activity and health worldwide.

BACKGROUND: Current literature does not dispose from a widely accepted definition of recovery in alcohol use disorder (AUD), and most proposals originate from anglophone countries. This study introduces a pioneering consensus in Spain on the definition of recovery in AUD.
METHODS: The Delphi method was used. The expert panel, comprising 54 multidisciplinary professionals from the Community of Madrid.
RESULTS: A high level of consensus (≥80% agreement) was reached for 45% of the items and majority (≥60%) for 84%. Recovery is understood as a dynamic, personalized, and voluntary process, potentially enduring throughout one\'s lifespan. It entails a transformative lifestyle shift aimed at achieving a significant improvement in overall quality of life, encompassing physical and mental health, interpersonal relationships, and environmental factors. The journey of recovery is marked by heightened psychological well-being, is characterized by empowerment, personal growth, existential purpose, and positive identity reconstruction. Recovery is supported by substance use management, requires proactive individual agency and involves both personal and societal responsibilities.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents a milestone as it is the first consensus in the Community of Madrid on the meaning of recovery in AUD. The proposed definition of recovery could be a potential reference for similar regions within Spain or even for other countries with cultural similarities. The elucidation of a clear framework of recovery provides a solid basis for future research efforts and clinical interventions in the Spanish AUD landscape.

BACKGROUND: Paramedicine is a dynamic profession which has evolved from a \"treat and transport\" service into a complex network of health professionals working in a diverse range of clinical roles. Research is challenging in the paramedicine context, and internationally, research capacity and culture has developed slowly. International examples of research agendas and strategies in paramedicine exist, however, research priorities have not previously been identified in Ireland.
METHODS: This study was a three round electronic modified Delphi design which aimed to establish the key aspects of the research priorities via end-user consensus. Participants included interested stakeholders involved in prehospital care or research in Ireland. The first round questionnaire consisted of open-ended questions with results coded and developed into themes for the closed-ended questions used in the second and third round questionnaires. A consensus level of 70% was set a priori for second and third rounds.
RESULTS: Research Priorities that reached consensus included Staff Wellbeing, Education and Professionalism and Acute Medical Conditions. Respondents indicated that these three areas should be a priority in the next 2 years. Education, Staffing and Leadership were imperative Key Resources that required change. Education was a Key Processes change deemed imperative to allow the future research to occur. Outcomes that should be included in the future research strategy were Patient Outcomes, Practitioner Development, Practitioner Wellbeing, Alternate Pathways, Evidence-based Practice and Staff Satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are similar to previously published international studies, with some key differences. There was a greater emphasis on Education and Practitioner Wellbeing with the latter possibly attributed to the timing of the research in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. The disseminated findings of this study should inform sustainable funding models to aid the development of paramedicine research in Ireland.