Costs

Costs
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)是糖尿病患者常见的并发症。它与生活质量差和护理费用高有关。这项研究调查了痛苦的DPN对医疗保健成本和资源利用的影响。
    方法:这是从Optum的去识别的Clinformatics®DataMart数据库中对成年糖尿病患者(1型或2型)的行政索赔进行的回顾性分析。根据DPN的存在和疼痛的严重程度,将患者分为四个队列。基于一年基线的诊断和处方模式。计算指数DPN诊断后一年的全因和糖尿病相关费用。评估了与严重疼痛性DPN相关的危险因素。
    结果:相对于没有DPN的结果,没有疼痛的DPN患者,疼痛性DPN(PDPN),或严重的PDPN分别增加了3,093美元、9,349美元和20,887美元的平均年度所有原因成本。疼痛/严重DPN的一半以上的费用用于处方和住院。严重的PDPN与糖尿病性肌萎缩的几率升高相关(OR:8.09;95%CI:6.84-9.56),糖尿病足溃疡(OR:6.54,95%CI:6.32-6.76),和流动性丧失(OR:2.54,95%CI:2.48-2.60),在其他并发症中。
    结论:痛苦的DPN与更高的医疗保健成本和资源利用率有关,以及限制生活质量的衰弱状况的更大风险。未来的研究应该集中在更好的治疗方案和更积极的疼痛管理策略上,以减少DPN的负面影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication in patients with diabetes. It is associated with a poor quality of life and high costs of care. This study investigated the impact of painful DPN on healthcare costs and resource utilization.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of administrative claims of adult patients with diabetes (type 1 or 2) from Optum\'s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. Patients were assigned to four cohorts by presence of DPN and pain severity, based on diagnoses and prescription patterns in a one-year baseline. All-cause and diabetes-associated costs were calculated for the year following the index DPN diagnosis. Risk factors associated with presence of severely painful DPN were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Relative to those without DPN, patients who had DPN without pain, painful DPN (PDPN), or severe PDPN incurred respective increases of $3,093, $9,349, and $20,887 in average annual all-cause costs. More than half of costs from painful/severe DPN were for prescriptions and inpatient hospitalization. Severe PDPN was associated with elevated odds of diabetic amyotrophy (OR: 8.09; 95% CI: 6.84-9.56), diabetic foot ulcers (OR: 6.54, 95% CI: 6.32-6.76), and loss of mobility (OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 2.48-2.60), among other complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Painful DPN is associated with higher healthcare costs and resource utilization, and a greater risk of debilitating conditions that limit quality of life. Future research should focus on better treatment options and more aggressive pain management strategies to reduce the negative impacts of DPN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童虐待(CM)是一个主要的公共卫生问题,具有终身影响。它对收入支持的影响很少被研究。
    目标:研究CM与收入支持付款的接收之间的关联以及对16至33岁人员的预算影响。
    方法:南澳大利亚出生队列,生于1986年至2004年(n=339,411)。
    方法:我们将儿童保护(CP)行政记录与国家福利支付记录联系起来,2020年3月结束。CP联系人描述了收入支持付款的接收和平均付款金额(根据儿童和家庭属性进行了调整)。预算影响是在国家一级建模的。
    结果:对于有任何CP接触与没有CP接触的个人,收到任何收入支持付款的调整后优势比(AOR)为3.01(2.95-3.07)。在收到任何付款的人中,在没有接触CP的个人中,调整后的年平均福利支付为3754美元(1446美元),有任何CP联系人的6262美元(4,307美元),和$9,747在OOHC的人。从16岁到33岁的累计付款总额为38,570美元(26,652美元),和181,743美元(125,003美元)的个人在OOHC。以33岁的澳大利亚人口为模型,与CP联系相关的额外费用使政府收入支持预算增加了39%。
    结论:CM与收入支持付款的接收密切相关。对涉及CP的儿童的有效预防和保护策略的投资可以解决健康的这一核心社会决定因素,同时节省预算。
    BACKGROUND: Child maltreatment (CM) is a major public health concern with life-long effects. Its impact on income support has rarely been studied.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between CM and receipt of income support payments and the budgetary impact for persons 16 to 33 years.
    METHODS: A South Australian birth cohort, born 1986 to 2004 (n = 339,411).
    METHODS: We linked child protection (CP) administrative records with national welfare payment records, ending March 2020. Receipt of income support payments and mean payment amounts were described by CP contact (adjusted for child and family attributes). Budget impact was modelled at the national level.
    RESULTS: Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for receipt of any income support payment was 3.01 (2.95-3.07) for individuals with any CP contact versus no CP contact. Among those receiving any payment, adjusted annualised mean benefit payment was $3754 (US$1446) among individuals with no CP contact, $6262 (US$4,307) in persons with any CP contact, and $9,747 in persons who\'d been in OOHC. Cumulative payments modelled from age 16 to 33 years totalled $38,570 (US$26,652) for individuals with no CP contact, and $181,743 (US$125,003) for individuals who\'d been in OOHC. Modelled for the Australian population to age 33, the extra cost associated with CP contact added 39 % to the government income support budget.
    CONCLUSIONS: CM is strongly associated with receipt of income support payments. Investment in effective preventive and protective strategies for CP involved children could address this core social determinant of health, while providing budget savings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19/流感组合快速检测提供了一种快速准确区分两种感染的方法。这项经济评估的目标是评估COVID-19/流感快速诊断测试(RDT)与组合的成本和健康效益。巴西私人医疗保健环境中的当前护理标准。开发了一个双决策树模型,以估计COVID-19和流感的快速分化对门诊医疗机构中1000名患有流感样疾病的成年人的假设队列的影响。该模型比较了COVID-19/流感RDT组合的使用与巴西标准的COVID-19RDT诊断实践和推定流感诊断。不同水平的流感流行率被建模,共感染估计为COVID-19流行率的函数。结果包括诊断的准确性,抗病毒处方和医疗资源使用(病床天数和ICU入住)。根据流感流行情况,考虑到1000名患有流感样疾病的患者,与标准做法相比,RDT组合估计可减少88至149例流感(包括合并感染)的漏诊,流感过度诊断病例减少161至185例;医院病床天数减少24%至34%,ICU天数减少16%至26%。在基本情况下(20%流感,5%COVID-19),RDT组合估计可节省队列成本99美元.基于从头经济模型,这项分析表明,联合使用RDT可能会对流感抗病毒处方产生积极影响,并降低医疗保健资源的使用.
    Combination COVID-19/influenza rapid tests provide a way to quickly and accurately differentiate between the two infections. The goal of this economic evaluation was to assess the cost and health benefits of a combination COVID-19/influenza Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) vs. current standard-of-care in the Brazilian private healthcare setting. A dual decision tree model was developed to estimate the impact of rapid differentiation of COVID-19 and influenza in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 adults with influenza-like illness in an ambulatory healthcare setting. The model compared the use of a combination COVID-19/influenza RDT to Brazil standard diagnostic practice of a COVID-19 RDT and presumptive influenza diagnosis. Different levels of influenza prevalence were modeled with co-infection estimated as a function of the COVID-19 prevalence. Outcomes included accuracy of diagnosis, antiviral prescriptions and healthcare resource use (hospital bed days and ICU occupancy). Depending on influenza prevalence, considering 1,000 patients with influenza-like illness, a combination RDT compared to standard practice was estimated to result in between 88 and 149 fewer missed diagnoses of influenza (including co-infection), 161 to 185 fewer cases of over-diagnosis of influenza; a 24 to 34% reduction in hospital bed days and a 16 to 26% reduction in ICU days. In the base case scenario (20% influenza, 5% COVID-19), the combination RDT was estimated to result in cohort cost savings of $99. Based upon a de novo economic model, this analysis indicates that use of a combination RDT could positively impact influenza antiviral prescriptions and lower healthcare resource use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    风险评估对于预防心血管疾病至关重要。在近期急性冠脉综合征(ACS)或冠脉血运重建的患者中,风险预测工具,像欧洲心脏病学会指南推荐的SMART-REACH风险评分,越来越多地用于预测复发性心血管事件的风险,从而实现基于风险的个性化预防。然而,关于风险分层与人口水平的社会和医疗成本之间的关系知之甚少。这项研究评估了基线SMART-REACH风险评分之间的关联,长期复发临床事件,累积成本,以及近期ACS和/或血运重建患者的指标事件后LDL-C目标达成情况。
    这项回顾性研究使用了电子健康记录,并在芬兰的北卡累利阿地区进行。该研究队列包括2017年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间因ACS入院或接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉搭桥手术的所有45-85岁患者。根据基线SMART-REACH风险评分将患者分为五分之一,以检查预测的5年评分与选定的临床和经济结果之间的关联。此外,进行简单的基于年龄的分层作为敏感性分析.观察到的5年复发事件的累积发生率从最低的20%到最高风险五分之一的41%不等。而相应的预测风险从13%到51%不等,每位患者的累计5年平均总费用为15827至46182欧元,分别。监测和达到低LDL-C值都是次优的。
    使用SMART-REACH五分位数作为人群水平的风险分层工具成功地将患者分层为具有不同累计复发事件数和累计总费用的亚组。然而,需要更多的研究来确定人群分层的临床和经济上的最佳阈值.
    UNASSIGNED: Risk assessment is essential in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or coronary revascularization, risk prediction tools, like the European Society of Cardiology guideline recommended SMART-REACH risk score, are increasingly used to predict the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events enabling risk-based personalized prevention. However, little is known about the association between risk stratification and the social and healthcare costs at a population level. This study evaluated the associations between baseline SMART-REACH risk scores, long-term recurrent clinical events, cumulative costs, and post-index event LDL-C goal attainment in patients with recent ACS and/or revascularization.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study used electronic health records and was conducted in the North Karelia region of Finland. The study cohort included all patients aged 45-85 admitted to a hospital for ACS or who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into quintiles based on their baseline SMART-REACH risk scores to examine the associations between predicted 5-year scores and selected clinical and economic outcomes. In addition, simple age-based stratification was conducted as a sensitivity analysis. The observed 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrent events ranged from 20% in the lowest to 41% in the highest risk quintile, whereas the corresponding predicted risks ranged from 13% to 51%, and cumulative 5-year mean total costs per patient ranged from 15 827 to 46 182€, respectively. Both monitoring and attainment of low LDL-C values were suboptimal.
    UNASSIGNED: The use of the SMART-REACH quintiles as a population-level risk stratification tool successfully stratified patients into subgroups with different cumulative numbers of recurrent events and cumulative total costs. However, more research is needed to define clinically and economically optimal threshold values for a population-level stratification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:北领地(NT)的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)负担很高,澳大利亚。本研究旨在描述有CKD风险的人群的医疗保健使用和相关成本(例如,急性肾损伤,糖尿病,高血压,和心血管疾病)或在NT中患有CKD,从医疗保健资助者的角度来看。
    方法:我们纳入了有以下风险的患者的回顾性队列:或者和CKD生活在一起,2017年1月1日。接受肾脏替代治疗的患者被排除在研究之外。数据来自领土肾脏保健数据库,使用来自公立医院和整个北领地的初级卫生保健服务的患者进行成本核算.年度医疗费用,包括医院,初级卫生保健,药物,和调查费用在一年的随访期内进行了描述。通过成本预测模型确定了与高年度医疗总费用相关的因素。
    结果:在这项研究中纳入的37,398名患者中,23,419患有CKD的危险因素,而13,979患有CKD(1至5期,未接受肾脏替代疗法)。总体平均(±SD)年龄为45岁(±17),研究队列中有很大一部分是原住民(68%)。总体队列中常见的合并症包括糖尿病(36%),高血压(32%),和冠状动脉疾病(11%)。在有CKD风险的人群中,年度医疗费用最低(每人7,958澳元),在患有CKD5期的人群中最高(每人67,117澳元)。住院护理占所有医疗保健费用的大部分(76%)。年度医疗总费用增加的预测因素包括CKD的更高级阶段,和合并症的存在。在CKD第5阶段,与没有CKD的风险组的人相比,每人每年的额外费用为$53,634(95CI32,769至89,482,p<0.001)。
    结论:CKD晚期的总医疗费用很高,即使病人没有透析.仍然需要针对CKD和相关慢性病症的有效一级预防和早期干预策略。
    BACKGROUND: The burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia. This study aims to describe the healthcare use and associated costs of people at risk of CKD (e.g. acute kidney injury, diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease) or living with CKD in the NT, from a healthcare funder perspective.
    METHODS: We included a retrospective cohort of patients at risk of, or living with CKD, on 1 January 2017. Patients on kidney replacement therapy were excluded from the study. Data from the Territory Kidney Care database, encompassing patients from public hospitals and primary health care services across the NT was used to conduct costing. Annual healthcare costs, including hospital, primary health care, medication, and investigation costs were described over a one-year follow-up period. Factors associated with high total annual healthcare costs were identified with a cost prediction model.
    RESULTS: Among 37,398 patients included in this study, 23,419 had a risk factor for CKD while 13,979 had CKD (stages 1 to 5, not on kidney replacement therapy). The overall mean (± SD) age was 45 years (± 17), and a large proportion of the study cohort were First Nations people (68%). Common comorbidities in the overall cohort included diabetes (36%), hypertension (32%), and coronary artery disease (11%). Annual healthcare cost was lowest in those at risk of CKD (AUD$7,958 per person) and highest in those with CKD stage 5 (AUD$67,117 per person). Inpatient care contributed to the majority (76%) of all healthcare costs. Predictors of increased total annual healthcare cost included more advanced stages of CKD, and the presence of comorbidities. In CKD stage 5, the additional cost per person per year was + $53,634 (95%CI 32,769 to 89,482, p < 0.001) compared to people in the at risk group without CKD.
    CONCLUSIONS: The total healthcare costs in advanced stages of CKD is high, even when patients are not on dialysis. There remains a need for effective primary prevention and early intervention strategies targeting CKD and related chronic conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在临床微生物学实验室中,没有关于分离特定微生物的全部工作量的准确信息,与之相关的成本尚未具体估算。在2021年1月至2022年12月在综合教学医院微生物学部门进行的这项描述性回顾性研究中,我们评估了与识别所有类型临床样本和患者中的念珠菌种类相关的工作量。根据从医院财务部门和微生物实验室成本记录获得的数据估算成本。在两年内,我们的微生物学部门处理了1,008,231个样本,其中8,775个有一个或多个念珠菌属。分离株(总计9,683株)。总的来说,5,151个带有念珠菌的样品。从2383名住院患者中确定。我们分离了念珠菌。从515.3个样本/100,000个人口/年和从92个样本/1,000个住院/年。按样品类型,90.8%是肤浅的,主要是粘膜。只有9.1%的念珠菌属。与深处隔绝,通常是无菌的,样品,主要来自通常无菌的液体。白色念珠菌是确定的主要物种(58.5%),紧随其后的是近扁平梭菌复合体,C.光滑,C.热带,还有C.krusei.在入院的患者中,念珠菌属样品的发生率。分离株为302.7个样本/100,000个人口/年和54个样本/1,000个入院/年。分离和鉴定念珠菌的平均成本。估计每个培养阳性样本为25欧元。据我们所知,这是首次尝试测量念珠菌属的工作量和成本。在医院微生物科隔离.这些数据可以帮助评估其他机构念珠菌隔离的负担和重要性,也有助于设计精简措施。
    目的:我们认为这项工作很有意义,因为目前,在临床微生物学实验室中,没有关于分离特定微生物所涉及的总工作量的准确信息。与此相关的费用也没有描述。我们已经描述了念珠菌属的无限制工作量。在所有类型的物种和患者的所有类型的样本中。我们认为,这些信息对于收集和共享这些信息以及以标准化的方式收集以了解念珠菌属的现状是必要的。所有临床微生物学实验室的工作量。
    There is no precise information available on the entire workload of isolating a specific microorganism in a clinical microbiology laboratory, and the costs associated with it have not been specifically estimated. In this descriptive retrospective study conducted at the microbiology department of a general teaching hospital from January 2021 to December 2022, we assessed the workload associated with identifying Candida species in all types of clinical samples and patients. Costs were estimated from data obtained from the hospital\'s finance department and microbiology laboratory cost records. In 2 years, 1,008,231 samples were processed at our microbiology department, of which 8,775 had one or more Candida spp. isolates (9,683 total isolates). Overall, 5,151 samples with Candida spp. were identified from 2,383 inpatients. We isolated Candida spp. from 515.3 samples/100,000 population/year and from 92 samples/1,000 hospital admissions/year. By sample type, 90.8% were superficial, mainly mucosal. Only 9.1% Candida spp. were isolated from deep, usually sterile, samples, being mostly from ordinarily sterile fluids. Candida albicans was the main species (58.5%) identified, followed by C. parapsilosis complex, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei. In admitted patients, the incidences of samples with Candida spp. isolates were 302.7 samples/100,000 population/year and 54 samples/1,000 admissions/year. The average cost of isolating and identifying Candida spp. was estimated at 25€ per culture-positive sample. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to gage the workload and costs of Candida spp. isolation at a hospital microbiology department. These data can help assess the burden and significance of Candida isolation at other institutions and also help design measures for streamlining.
    OBJECTIVE: We believe that this work is of interest because at present, there is no really accurate information available on the total workload involved in isolating a specific microorganism in a clinical microbiology laboratory. The costs related to this have also not been described. We have described the unrestricted workload of Candida spp. in all types of samples for all types of species and patients. We believe that this information would be necessary to collect and share this information as well as to collect it in a standardized way to know the current situation of Candida spp. workload in all clinical microbiology laboratories.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:患有慢性内分泌疾病的青少年从儿科到成人护理的结构性转变很重要。直到现在,没有关于过渡过程必要组成部分所需的时间和资源以及相关成本的数据。
    方法:在147例慢性内分泌疾病患者的前瞻性队列研究中,对于结构化过渡途径的关键要素,包括(i)评估患者的疾病相关知识和需求,(ii)所需的教育和咨询课程,(iii)确定了患者的危机和转移任命以及当前的儿科和未来的成人内分泌学家资源消耗和成本。
    结果:147名接受治疗的患者中有143名(97.3%)完成了过渡途径,并转入成人护理。从决定开始过渡过程到最终转移咨询的平均时间为399±159天。143名患者进行了转移咨询,包括128名与未来的成人内分泌学家共同治疗的患者。大多数会诊是由一个由儿科和成人内分泌学家组成的多学科小组进行的,心理学家,护士,一名社会工作者也担任案件经理,中位数为三名团队成员,持续了87.6±23.7分钟。每位患者所有关键要素的平均累积成本为519±206欧元。此外,通过过渡过程的病例管理成本为104.8±28.0欧元。
    结论:以慢性内分泌疾病为例,它显示了如何计算从儿科到成人护理的结构化过渡途径的时间和成本,这可以作为其他慢性罕见疾病可持续资助的起点。
    OBJECTIVE: Structured transition of adolescents and young adults with a chronic endocrine disease from paediatric to adult care is important. Until now, no data on time and resources required for the necessary components of the transition process and the associated costs are available.
    METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of 147 patients with chronic endocrinopathies, for the key elements of a structured transition pathway including (i) assessment of patients\' disease-related knowledge and needs, (ii) required education and counselling sessions, (iii) compiling an epicrisis and a transfer appointment of the patient together with the current paediatric and the future adult endocrinologist resource consumption and costs were determined.
    RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three of 147 enroled patients (97.3%) completed the transition pathway and were transferred to adult care. The mean time from the decision to start the transition process to the final transfer consultation was 399 ± 159 days. Transfer consultations were performed in 143 patients, including 128 patients jointly with the future adult endocrinologist. Most consultations were performed by a multidisciplinary team consisting of a paediatric and adult endocrinologist, psychologist, nurse, and a social worker acting also as a case manager with a median of three team members and lasted 87.6 ± 23.7 min. The mean cumulative costs per patient of all key elements were 519 ± 206 Euros. In addition, costs for case management through the transition process were 104.8 ± 28.0 Euros.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using chronic endocrine diseases as an example, it shows how to calculate the time and cost of a structured transition pathway from paediatric to adult care, which can serve as a starting point for sustainable funding for other chronic rare diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)已被证明会造成相当大的临床和经济负担;然而,量化儿科患者中由多动症常见精神病合并症引起的额外负担的研究很少.这项研究评估了焦虑和抑郁对美国ADHD儿科患者医疗资源利用(HRU)和医疗费用的影响。
    方法:在IQVIAPharMetricsPlus数据库(10/01/2015-09/30/2021)中确定了年龄在6-17岁的ADHD患者。索引日期是开始随机选择的ADHD治疗的日期。在基线(指标前6个月)和研究期间(指标后12个月)诊断为焦虑和/或抑郁的患者被分类为ADHD焦虑/抑郁队列;在这两个时期没有诊断为焦虑或抑郁的患者被分类为仅ADHD队列。熵平衡用于创建重新加权的队列。使用回归分析比较了研究期间的全因HRU和医疗费用。还根据合并症在亚组中进行了成本分析。
    结果:仅重新加权的ADHD队列(N=204,723)和ADHD焦虑/抑郁队列(N=66,231)具有相似的特征(平均年龄:11.9岁;72.8%的男性;56.2%的人合并注意力不集中和过度活跃的ADHD类型)。ADHD+焦虑/抑郁队列的HRU高于仅ADHD队列(住院率:10.3;急诊室就诊:1.6;门诊就诊:2.3;专家就诊:5.3;心理治疗就诊:6.1;所有p<0.001)。较高的HRU意味着更高的全因医疗保健成本;仅ADHD队列中平均每患者每年(PPPY)成本与ADHD+焦虑/抑郁队列为3,988美元,而不是8682美元(p<0.001)。当同时存在两种合并症时,所有原因的医疗费用最高;在只有焦虑症的ADHD患者中,只有抑郁症,焦虑和抑郁,所有原因的平均医疗费用为7309美元、9901美元和13785美元,分别(所有p<0.001)。
    结论:在患有ADHD的儿科患者中,焦虑和抑郁与HRU风险显著增加和医疗费用增加相关;两种合并症的存在导致费用相对于单独的ADHD高3.5倍。这些发现强调了共同管理ADHD和精神病合并症的必要性,以帮助减轻患者和医疗保健系统承担的巨大负担。
    BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been shown to pose considerable clinical and economic burden; however, research quantifying the excess burden attributable to common psychiatric comorbidities of ADHD among pediatric patients is scarce. This study assessed the impact of anxiety and depression on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs in pediatric patients with ADHD in the United States.
    METHODS: Patients with ADHD aged 6-17 years were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (10/01/2015-09/30/2021). The index date was the date of initiation of a randomly selected ADHD treatment. Patients with ≥ 1 diagnosis for anxiety and/or depression during both the baseline (6 months pre-index) and study period (12 months post-index) were classified in the ADHD+anxiety/depression cohort; those without diagnoses for anxiety nor depression during both periods were classified in the ADHD-only cohort. Entropy balancing was used to create reweighted cohorts. All-cause HRU and healthcare costs during the study period were compared using regression analyses. Cost analyses were also performed in subgroups by comorbid conditions.
    RESULTS: The reweighted ADHD-only cohort (N = 204,723) and ADHD+anxiety/depression cohort (N = 66,231) had similar characteristics (mean age: 11.9 years; 72.8% male; 56.2% had combined inattentive and hyperactive ADHD type). The ADHD+anxiety/depression cohort had higher HRU than the ADHD-only cohort (incidence rate ratios for inpatient admissions: 10.3; emergency room visits: 1.6; outpatient visits: 2.3; specialist visits: 5.3; and psychotherapy visits: 6.1; all p < 0.001). The higher HRU translated to greater all-cause healthcare costs; the mean per-patient-per-year (PPPY) costs in the ADHD-only cohort vs. ADHD+anxiety/depression cohort was $3,988 vs. $8,682 (p < 0.001). All-cause healthcare costs were highest when both comorbidities were present; among patients with ADHD who had only anxiety, only depression, and both anxiety and depression, the mean all-cause healthcare costs were $7,309, $9,901, and $13,785 PPPY, respectively (all p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid anxiety and depression was associated with significantly increased risk of HRU and higher healthcare costs among pediatric patients with ADHD; the presence of both comorbid conditions resulted in 3.5 times higher costs relative to ADHD alone. These findings underscore the need to co-manage ADHD and psychiatric comorbidities to help mitigate the substantial burden borne by patients and the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:关于与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)和糖尿病并存相关的支出趋势的基于人群的国家数据很少。我们评估了有和没有糖尿病的个体中ASCVD的直接医疗保健支出趋势,这可以帮助更好地定义糖尿病和ASCVD共同发生的负担。
    方法:我们使用了美国国家医疗支出小组调查的12年数据(2008-2019年),包括28,144名年龄≥18岁的美国人。使用两部分模型(根据人口统计进行调整,合并症和时间),我们估算了ASCVD患者中按糖尿病状态划分的平均和调整医疗支出增量.费用是直接的医疗保健总支出(自付费用和私人保险支付,医疗补助,Medicare,和其他来源)来自各种来源(基于办公室的访问,医院门诊,急诊室,住院医院,药房,家庭保健,和其他医疗支出)。
    结果:患有ASCVD的个人的总直接支出从2008-2009年的$14,713(95%置信区间(CI):$13,808-$15,619)连续增加30%,至$19,145(95%CI:$17,988-$20,301)在2008-2019年。糖尿病患者的平均支出是没有糖尿病患者的1.5倍。观察到的直接成本增加的一个关键驱动因素是处方药成本,在所有ASCVD患者中增加了37%。在ASCVD和糖尿病患者中,处方药成本的增加更为明显,观察到成本增加了45%,从2008-2009年的5184美元(95%CI:4721-5646美元)到2018-2019年的7501美元(95%CI:6678-8325美元)。与没有糖尿病的人相比,患有ASCVD和糖尿病的人有5563美元(95%CI:4643-6483美元)更高的直接增量支出。在调整人口统计学和合并症后。在患有ASCVD的美国成年人中,据估计,在糖尿病患者中,调整后的直接超额医疗支出总额为每年420亿美元。那些没有糖尿病的人。
    结论:在ASCVD的设置中,糖尿病与显著增加的医疗费用有关,由药物费用的显著增加推动的增长。
    OBJECTIVE: Population-based national data on the trends in expenditures related to coexisting atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) and diabetes is scarce. We assessed the trends in direct health care expenditures for ASCVD among individuals with and without diabetes, which can help to better define the burden of the co-occurrence of diabetes and ASCVD.
    METHODS: We used 12-year data (2008-2019) from the US national Medical Expenditure Panel Survey including 28,144 U.S individuals aged ≥ 18 years. Using a two-part model (adjusting for demographics, comorbidities and time), we estimated mean and adjusted incremental medical expenditures by diabetes status among individuals with ASCVD. The costs were direct total health care expenditures (out-of-pocket payments and payments by private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and other sources) from various sources (office-based visits, hospital outpatient, emergency room, inpatient hospital, pharmacy, home health care, and other medical expenditures).
    RESULTS: The total direct expenditures for individuals with ASCVD increased continuously by 30% from $14,713 (95% confidence interval (CI): $13,808-$15,619) in 2008-2009 to $19,145 (95% CI: $17,988-$20,301) in 2008-2019. Individuals with diabetes had a 1.5-fold higher mean expenditure that those without diabetes. A key driver of the observed increase in direct costs was prescription drug costs, which increased by 37% among all individuals with ASCVD. The increase in prescription drug costs was more pronounced among individuals with ASCVD and diabetes, in whom a 45% increase in costs was observed, from $5184 (95% CI: $4721-$5646) in 2008-2009 to $7501 (95% CI: $6678-$8325) in 2018-2019. Individuals with ASCVD and diabetes had $5563 (95% CI: $4643-$6483) higher direct incremental expenditures compared with those without diabetes, after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities. Among US adults with ASCVD, the estimated adjusted total direct excess medical expenditures were $42 billion per year among those with diabetes vs. those without diabetes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of ASCVD, diabetes is associated with significantly increased health care costs, an increase that was driven by marked increase in medication costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是比较氟喹替尼的不良事件(AE)管理成本,Regorafenib,从美国商业和医疗保险支付者的角度来看,三氟尿苷/替吡草胺(T/T)和三氟尿苷/替吡草胺+贝伐单抗(T/T+bev)治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者之前接受过至少两种先前治疗方案。材料与方法:开发了成本-后果模型,以使用临床试验中发生率≥5%的3/4级不良事件发生率来计算每位患者和每位患者每月(PPPM)的不良事件成本。特定事件的管理成本和持续时间处理。AE成本的锚定比较是使用差异差异方法计算的,最佳支持护理(BSC)作为通用参考。AE发生率和治疗持续时间来自临床试验:FRESCO和FRESCO-2(氟喹替尼),RECOURSE(T/T),正确的(regorafenib)和阳光(T/T,T/T+bev)。商业和医疗保险观点的AE管理成本是从公开可用的来源获得的。结果:从商业角度来看,AE成本(按每位患者计算,PPPM)为:4015美元,福喹替尼1091美元(FRESCO);4253美元,福喹替尼1390美元(FRESCO-2);$17,110,$11,104T/T(RECOURSE);$9851,$4691T/T(SUNLIGHT);$8199,regorafenib$4823;$11,620,$这些结果在锚定比较中是一致的:基于FRESCO的fruquintinib的差异为-1929美元与regorafenib和-11,427美元与T/T;基于FRESCO-2的fruquintinib的差异为-2257美元与regorafenib和-11,756美元与T/T。在所有分析中,从医疗保险的角度来看,结果是一致的。结论:与regorafenib相比,Fruquintinib具有较低的AE管理成本,先前治疗过的mCRC患者的T/T和T/T+bev。这个证据对治疗有直接的影响,该患者人群的处方和路径决策。
    Aim: The objective of this study was to compare adverse event (AE) management costs for fruquintinib, regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) and trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (T/T+bev) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with at least two prior lines of therapy from the US commercial and Medicare payer perspectives. Materials & methods: A cost-consequence model was developed to calculate the per-patient and per-patient-per-month (PPPM) AE costs using rates of grade 3/4 AEs with incidence ≥5% in clinical trials, event-specific management costs and duration treatment. Anchored comparisons of AE costs were calculated using a difference-in-differences approach with best supportive care (BSC) as a common reference. AE rates and treatment duration were obtained from clinical trials: FRESCO and FRESCO-2 (fruquintinib), RECOURSE (T/T), CORRECT (regorafenib) and SUNLIGHT (T/T, T/T+bev). AE management costs for the commercial and Medicare perspectives were obtained from publicly available sources. Results: From the commercial perspective, the AE costs (presented as per-patient, PPPM) were: $4015, $1091 for fruquintinib (FRESCO); $4253, $1390 for fruquintinib (FRESCO-2); $17,110, $11,104 for T/T (RECOURSE); $9851, $4691 for T/T (SUNLIGHT); $8199, $4823 for regorafenib; and $11,620, $2324 for T/T+bev. These results were consistent in anchored comparisons: the difference-in-difference for fruquintinib based on FRESCO was -$1929 versus regorafenib and -$11,427 versus T/T; for fruquintinib based on FRESCO-2 was -$2257 versus regorafenib and -$11,756 versus T/T. Across all analyses, results were consistent from the Medicare perspective. Conclusion: Fruquintinib was associated with lower AE management costs compared with regorafenib, T/T and T/T+bev for patients with previously treated mCRC. This evidence has direct implications for treatment, formulary and pathways decision-making in this patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号