Costs

Costs
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    风险评估对于预防心血管疾病至关重要。在近期急性冠脉综合征(ACS)或冠脉血运重建的患者中,风险预测工具,像欧洲心脏病学会指南推荐的SMART-REACH风险评分,越来越多地用于预测复发性心血管事件的风险,从而实现基于风险的个性化预防。然而,关于风险分层与人口水平的社会和医疗成本之间的关系知之甚少。这项研究评估了基线SMART-REACH风险评分之间的关联,长期复发临床事件,累积成本,以及近期ACS和/或血运重建患者的指标事件后LDL-C目标达成情况。
    这项回顾性研究使用了电子健康记录,并在芬兰的北卡累利阿地区进行。该研究队列包括2017年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间因ACS入院或接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉搭桥手术的所有45-85岁患者。根据基线SMART-REACH风险评分将患者分为五分之一,以检查预测的5年评分与选定的临床和经济结果之间的关联。此外,进行简单的基于年龄的分层作为敏感性分析.观察到的5年复发事件的累积发生率从最低的20%到最高风险五分之一的41%不等。而相应的预测风险从13%到51%不等,每位患者的累计5年平均总费用为15827至46182欧元,分别。监测和达到低LDL-C值都是次优的。
    使用SMART-REACH五分位数作为人群水平的风险分层工具成功地将患者分层为具有不同累计复发事件数和累计总费用的亚组。然而,需要更多的研究来确定人群分层的临床和经济上的最佳阈值.
    UNASSIGNED: Risk assessment is essential in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or coronary revascularization, risk prediction tools, like the European Society of Cardiology guideline recommended SMART-REACH risk score, are increasingly used to predict the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events enabling risk-based personalized prevention. However, little is known about the association between risk stratification and the social and healthcare costs at a population level. This study evaluated the associations between baseline SMART-REACH risk scores, long-term recurrent clinical events, cumulative costs, and post-index event LDL-C goal attainment in patients with recent ACS and/or revascularization.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study used electronic health records and was conducted in the North Karelia region of Finland. The study cohort included all patients aged 45-85 admitted to a hospital for ACS or who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into quintiles based on their baseline SMART-REACH risk scores to examine the associations between predicted 5-year scores and selected clinical and economic outcomes. In addition, simple age-based stratification was conducted as a sensitivity analysis. The observed 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrent events ranged from 20% in the lowest to 41% in the highest risk quintile, whereas the corresponding predicted risks ranged from 13% to 51%, and cumulative 5-year mean total costs per patient ranged from 15 827 to 46 182€, respectively. Both monitoring and attainment of low LDL-C values were suboptimal.
    UNASSIGNED: The use of the SMART-REACH quintiles as a population-level risk stratification tool successfully stratified patients into subgroups with different cumulative numbers of recurrent events and cumulative total costs. However, more research is needed to define clinically and economically optimal threshold values for a population-level stratification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)已被证明会造成相当大的临床和经济负担;然而,量化儿科患者中由多动症常见精神病合并症引起的额外负担的研究很少.这项研究评估了焦虑和抑郁对美国ADHD儿科患者医疗资源利用(HRU)和医疗费用的影响。
    方法:在IQVIAPharMetricsPlus数据库(10/01/2015-09/30/2021)中确定了年龄在6-17岁的ADHD患者。索引日期是开始随机选择的ADHD治疗的日期。在基线(指标前6个月)和研究期间(指标后12个月)诊断为焦虑和/或抑郁的患者被分类为ADHD焦虑/抑郁队列;在这两个时期没有诊断为焦虑或抑郁的患者被分类为仅ADHD队列。熵平衡用于创建重新加权的队列。使用回归分析比较了研究期间的全因HRU和医疗费用。还根据合并症在亚组中进行了成本分析。
    结果:仅重新加权的ADHD队列(N=204,723)和ADHD焦虑/抑郁队列(N=66,231)具有相似的特征(平均年龄:11.9岁;72.8%的男性;56.2%的人合并注意力不集中和过度活跃的ADHD类型)。ADHD+焦虑/抑郁队列的HRU高于仅ADHD队列(住院率:10.3;急诊室就诊:1.6;门诊就诊:2.3;专家就诊:5.3;心理治疗就诊:6.1;所有p<0.001)。较高的HRU意味着更高的全因医疗保健成本;仅ADHD队列中平均每患者每年(PPPY)成本与ADHD+焦虑/抑郁队列为3,988美元,而不是8682美元(p<0.001)。当同时存在两种合并症时,所有原因的医疗费用最高;在只有焦虑症的ADHD患者中,只有抑郁症,焦虑和抑郁,所有原因的平均医疗费用为7309美元、9901美元和13785美元,分别(所有p<0.001)。
    结论:在患有ADHD的儿科患者中,焦虑和抑郁与HRU风险显著增加和医疗费用增加相关;两种合并症的存在导致费用相对于单独的ADHD高3.5倍。这些发现强调了共同管理ADHD和精神病合并症的必要性,以帮助减轻患者和医疗保健系统承担的巨大负担。
    BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been shown to pose considerable clinical and economic burden; however, research quantifying the excess burden attributable to common psychiatric comorbidities of ADHD among pediatric patients is scarce. This study assessed the impact of anxiety and depression on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs in pediatric patients with ADHD in the United States.
    METHODS: Patients with ADHD aged 6-17 years were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (10/01/2015-09/30/2021). The index date was the date of initiation of a randomly selected ADHD treatment. Patients with ≥ 1 diagnosis for anxiety and/or depression during both the baseline (6 months pre-index) and study period (12 months post-index) were classified in the ADHD+anxiety/depression cohort; those without diagnoses for anxiety nor depression during both periods were classified in the ADHD-only cohort. Entropy balancing was used to create reweighted cohorts. All-cause HRU and healthcare costs during the study period were compared using regression analyses. Cost analyses were also performed in subgroups by comorbid conditions.
    RESULTS: The reweighted ADHD-only cohort (N = 204,723) and ADHD+anxiety/depression cohort (N = 66,231) had similar characteristics (mean age: 11.9 years; 72.8% male; 56.2% had combined inattentive and hyperactive ADHD type). The ADHD+anxiety/depression cohort had higher HRU than the ADHD-only cohort (incidence rate ratios for inpatient admissions: 10.3; emergency room visits: 1.6; outpatient visits: 2.3; specialist visits: 5.3; and psychotherapy visits: 6.1; all p < 0.001). The higher HRU translated to greater all-cause healthcare costs; the mean per-patient-per-year (PPPY) costs in the ADHD-only cohort vs. ADHD+anxiety/depression cohort was $3,988 vs. $8,682 (p < 0.001). All-cause healthcare costs were highest when both comorbidities were present; among patients with ADHD who had only anxiety, only depression, and both anxiety and depression, the mean all-cause healthcare costs were $7,309, $9,901, and $13,785 PPPY, respectively (all p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid anxiety and depression was associated with significantly increased risk of HRU and higher healthcare costs among pediatric patients with ADHD; the presence of both comorbid conditions resulted in 3.5 times higher costs relative to ADHD alone. These findings underscore the need to co-manage ADHD and psychiatric comorbidities to help mitigate the substantial burden borne by patients and the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了描述2型糖尿病(T2D)成年患者开始注射胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)治疗后的医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)和相关成本,观察,在法国进行24个月的Trophies学习,德国,和意大利。
    HCRU的成本计算数据是在GLP-1RA开始服用每周一次杜拉鲁肽或每天一次利拉鲁肽后约6、12、18和24个月的基线和随访访视期间由治疗医师收集的。从国家医疗系统(第三方付款人)的角度评估了成本,并更新到2018年的价格。
    总共,2,005例患者符合HCRU分析的条件(1,014杜拉鲁肽;991利拉鲁肽)。治疗组和国家之间的基线患者特征通常相似。在基线(42.9-43.4%)和第24个月(44.0-45.1%)使用≥2种口服降糖药物(GLM)和在第24个月(15.3-23.2%)使用另一种可注射GLM的患者比例最大的是法国。在每个评估期间,法国(范围=4.0-10.7)和德国(范围=2.9-5.7)的初级和二级医疗保健接触者的平均人数最高,分别。每位患者平均年化成本的最大比例(≥60%)包括药物成本。每位患者的平均年度HCRU费用因治疗队列和国家而异:最高水平是法国的利拉鲁肽队列(909欧元)和德国的杜拉鲁肽队列(883欧元)。
    限制包括排除在GLP-1RA启动时使用胰岛素的患者,以及由医生收集HCRU数据,不是通过病人完成的日记。
    现实世界中的HCRU和与T2D成人治疗相关的成本在《财富》中使用两个GLP-1RA强调,在评估特定国家/地区的新疗法的影响时,需要避免对HCRU和与特定疗法相关的成本进行概括。
    胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)已成为2型糖尿病(T2D)中高血糖症的常用治疗方法。并非所有类型的临床研究都提供有关这些治疗的成本或它们可能对使用其他药物和设备来控制T2D或需要去看医生或护士以及在医院接受不同类型治疗的影响的信息。这项研究在法国成年人的常规护理中收集了这些信息,德国,或意大利,他们的家庭医生或T2D专家开了杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽(两种类型的GLP-1RA)。在这三个国家中,使用杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽的人与使用相同GLP-1RA的人之间的成本以及对其他药物和医疗服务的需求存在差异。这项研究的信息可用于更准确地了解患者在法国使用杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽时所需的总成本和医疗护理,德国,或者意大利。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs after initiation of injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapy by adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the prospective, observational, 24-month TROPHIES study in France, Germany, and Italy.
    UNASSIGNED: HCRU data for cost calculations were collected by treating physicians during patient interviews at baseline and follow-up visits approximately 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after GLP-1 RA initiation with once-weekly dulaglutide or once-daily liraglutide. Costs were evaluated from the national healthcare system (third-party payer) perspective and updated to 2018 prices.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 2,005 patients were eligible for the HCRU analysis (1,014 dulaglutide; 991 liraglutide). Baseline patient characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups and countries. The largest proportions of patients using ≥2 oral glucose-lowering medications (GLMs) at baseline (42.9-43.4%) and month 24 (44.0-45.1%) and using another injectable GLM at month 24 (15.3-23.2%) were in France. Mean numbers of primary and secondary healthcare contacts during each assessment period were highest in France (range = 4.0-10.7) and Germany (range = 2.9-5.7), respectively. The greatest proportions (≥60%) of mean annualized costs per patient comprised medication costs. Mean annualized HCRU costs per patient varied by treatment cohort and country: the highest levels were in the liraglutide cohort in France (€909) and the dulaglutide cohort in Germany (€883).
    UNASSIGNED: Limitations included exclusion of patients using insulin at GLP-1 RA initiation and collection of HCRU data by physician, not via patient-completed diaries.
    UNASSIGNED: Real-world HCRU and costs associated with the treatment of adults with T2D with two GLP-1 RAs in TROPHIES emphasize the need to avoid generalization with respect to HCRU and costs associated with a particular therapy when estimating the impact of a new treatment in a country-specific setting.
    Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become frequent treatments of hyperglycemia in type-2 diabetes (T2D). Not all types of clinical study provide information about the cost of these treatments or the effects they might have on use of other medicines and equipment to control T2D or the need for visits to a doctor or nurse and different types of treatment in hospital. This study collected this information during the regular care of adults in France, Germany, or Italy who were prescribed either dulaglutide or liraglutide (both types of GLP-1 RAs) by their family doctor or a specialist in T2D. There were differences in costs and the need for other medicines and medical services between people using either dulaglutide or liraglutide and for people who were using the same GLP-1 RA in each of the three countries. The information from this study could be used to more accurately understand the overall costs and medical care needed when patients use dulaglutide or liraglutide in France, Germany, or Italy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管后路减压并融合(PDF)对治疗胸椎脊髓病有效,手术治疗有很高的各种并发症的风险。目前尚无有关胸椎纵韧带骨化(T-OPLL)和胸椎黄韧带骨化(T-OLF)的围手术期并发症的信息。我们评估了接受PDF的患者的T-OPLL和T-OLF之间的围手术期并发症发生率和成本。
    方法:在日本全国住院数据库中检测到2012年至2018年接受T-OPLL和T-OLFPDF的患者。根据患者特征和术前合并症,在T-OPLL和T-OLF之间进行一对一倾向评分匹配。我们检查了全身和局部并发症发生率,再手术率,住院时间,成本,排放目的地,匹配后的死亡率。
    结果:在总共2,660名患者中,匹配后纳入828对T-OPLL和T-OLF患者。T-OPLL组和OLF组的全身并发症发生率无显著差异。然而,T-OPLL组的局部并发症发生率高于T-OLF组(11.4%vs.7.7%P=0.012)。T-OPLL组的输血率也明显更高(14.1%vs.9.4%,P=0.003)。T-OPLL组住院时间更长(42.2天vs.36.2天,P=0.004)和更高的医疗费用(32,805美元对25,134美元,P<0.001)。在T-OPLL和T-OLF中,围手术期并发症的发生导致住院时间延长和医疗费用增加.虽然T-OPLL患者出院回家较少(51.6%vs.65.1%,P<0.001),患者更频繁地转移到其他医院(47.5%vs.33.5%,P=0.001)。
    结论:本研究使用大型国家数据库在PDF中确定了T-OPLL和T-OLF的围手术期并发症,这表明T-OPLL患者局部并发症的发生率较高。围手术期并发症导致住院时间延长和医疗费用增加。
    BACKGROUND: Although posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) are effective for treating thoracic myelopathy, surgical treatment has a high risk of various complications. There is currently no information available on the perioperative complications in thoracic ossification of the longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL) and thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (T-OLF). We evaluate the perioperative complication rate and cost between T-OPLL and T-OLF for patients underwent PDF.
    METHODS: Patients undergoing PDF for T-OPLL and T-OLF from 2012 to 2018 were detected in Japanese nationwide inpatient database. One-to-one propensity score matching between T-OPLL and T-OLF was performed based on patient characteristics and preoperative comorbidities. We examined systemic and local complication rate, reoperation rate, length of hospital stays, costs, discharge destination, and mortality after matching.
    RESULTS: In a total of 2,660 patients, 828 pairs of T-OPLL and T-OLF patients were included after matching. The incidence of systemic complications did not differ significantly between the T-OPLL and OLF groups. However, local complications were more frequently occurred in T-OPLL than in T-OLF groups (11.4% vs. 7.7% P = 0.012). Transfusion rates was also significantly higher in the T-OPLL group (14.1% vs. 9.4%, P = 0.003). T-OPLL group had longer hospital stay (42.2 days vs. 36.2 days, P = 0.004) and higher medical costs (USD 32,805 vs. USD 25,134, P < 0.001). In both T-OPLL and T-OLF, the occurrence of perioperative complications led to longer hospital stay and higher medical costs. While fewer patients in T-OPLL were discharged home (51.6% vs. 65.1%, P < 0.001), patients were transferred to other hospitals more frequently (47.5% vs. 33.5%, P = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This research identified the perioperative complications of T-OPLL and T-OLF in PDF using a large national database, which revealed that the incidence of local complications was higher in the T-OPLL patients. Perioperative complications resulted in longer hospital stays and higher medical costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    严重烧伤的治疗通常需要大量的人力和物力,包括专门的重症监护,分期手术,继续恢复。这给患者及其家庭带来了巨大的负担。烧伤治疗的费用受许多因素影响,包括患者的人口统计学和临床特征。这项研究旨在确定Korle-Bu教学医院的烧伤护理成本及其相关预测因素,加纳。
    在Korle-Bu教学医院的Burns中心对65名同意入院的成年患者进行了分析性横断面研究。获得了患者的人口统计学和临床特征以及烧伤治疗的直接成本。进行多元回归分析以确定烧伤护理直接成本的预测因素。
    共有65名参与者参加了这项研究,男女比例为1.4:1,平均年龄为35.9±14.6岁。近85%的人持续10-30%的全身表面积烧伤,而只有6.2%(4)的烧伤超过30%的全身表面积。烧伤治疗的平均总费用为GHS22,333.15(3,897.58美元)。手术治疗,伤口敷料和药物费用占45.6%,分别占燃烧总费用的27.5%和9.8%。
    烧伤治疗的直接成本非常高,并且可以通过烧伤的总表面积百分比和住院时间来预测。
    UNASSIGNED: treatment of severe burn injury generally requires enormous human and material resources including specialized intensive care, staged surgery, and continued restoration. This contributes to the enormous burden on patients and their families. The cost of burn treatment is influenced by many factors including the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient. This study aimed to determine the costs of burn care and its associated predictive factors in Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana.
    UNASSIGNED: an analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 65 consenting adult patients on admission at the Burns Centre of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients as well as the direct cost of burns treatment were obtained. Multiple regression analysis was done to determine the predictors of the direct cost of burn care.
    UNASSIGNED: a total of sixty-five (65) participants were enrolled in the study with a male-to-female ratio of 1.4: 1 and a mean age of 35.9 ± 14.6 years. Nearly 85% sustained between 10-30% total body surface area burns whilst only 6.2% (4) had burns more than 30% of total body surface area. The mean total cost of burns treatment was GHS 22,333.15 (USD 3,897.58). Surgical treatment, wound dressing and medication charges accounted for 45.6%, 27.5% and 9.8% of the total cost of burn respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: the direct costs of burn treatment were substantially high and were predicted by the percentage of total body surface area burn and length of hospital stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于医疗保健获得的第1阶段和第2阶段压力伤害知之甚少。我们报告了医疗保健获得性1期和2期压力性损伤的发生率,and,使用四种相互竞争的分析方法估计超额停留时间。我们讨论不同方法的优点。
    我们计算了在新加坡一家大型急性护理医院发生的1期和2期医疗保健获得性压力伤的月发病率。要估计超额停留时间,我们与对照组进行了未经调整的比较,进行线性回归,然后用伽马分布进行广义线性回归。最后,我们拟合了一个简单的基于状态的模型。成本归因工作的设计是一项回顾性匹配的队列研究。
    2016年的发病率为0.553%(95%置信区间[CI]0.55,0.557)和2017年的0.469%(95%CI0.466,0.472)。对于在最长停留时间60天审查的数据,未经调整的比较显示,超额住院时间最高,为17.68(16.43~18.93)天,多态模型显示最低,为1.22(0.19,2.23)天.
    将停留时间过长归因于压力伤害的低质量方法会产生夸大的估计,从而可能误导决策者。来自多状态模型的发现,这是一种适当的方法,是合理的,并说明了降低这些事件风险可能节省的卧床天数。第1阶段和第2阶段压力伤是常见的,并通过延长住院时间来增加成本。将有经济价值投资于预防。使用对停留时间过长的有偏差的估计会夸大预防的潜在价值。
    UNASSIGNED: Little is known about stage 1 and 2 pressure injuries that are health care-acquired. We report incidence rates of health care-acquired stage 1 and stage 2 pressure injuries, and, estimate the excess length of stay using four competing analytic methods. We discuss the merits of the different approaches.
    UNASSIGNED: We calculated monthly incidence rates for stage 1 and 2 health care-acquired pressure injuries occurring in a large Singapore acute care hospital. To estimate excess stay, we conducted unadjusted comparisons with a control cohort, performed linear regression and then generalized linear regression with a gamma distribution. Finally, we fitted a simple state-based model. The design for the cost attribution work was a retrospective matched cohort study.
    UNASSIGNED: Incidence rates in 2016 were 0.553% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55, 0.557) and 0.469% (95% CI 0.466, 0.472) in 2017. For data censored at 60 days\' maximum stay, the unadjusted comparisons showed the highest excess stay at 17.68 (16.43-18.93) days and multi-state models showed the lowest at 1.22 (0.19, 2.23) days.
    UNASSIGNED: Poor-quality methods for attribution of excess length of stay to pressure injury generate inflated estimates that could mislead decision makers. The findings from the multi-state model, which is an appropriate method, are plausible and illustrate the likely bed-days saved from lowering the risk of these events. Stage 1 and 2 pressure injuries are common and increase costs by prolonging the length of stay. There will be economic value investing in prevention. Using biased estimates of excess length of stay will overstate the potential value of prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探讨了社交媒体广告作为压力性尿失禁(SUI)女性招募策略的机会。
    方法:这项可行性研究是一项更大的临床试验的一部分,该临床试验是对SUI治疗患者决策辅助的影响。我们开始了为期61天的社交媒体广告活动,招募女性参加审判。我们研究的主要结果是入学速度。次要结果涉及每位参与者的成本,基线人口统计比较和广告系列绩效指标。此外,我们采访了招募的参与者,以确定我们方法的促进者和障碍。
    结果:招募了10名参与者,其中8人完成了完整的研究方案(2份问卷间隔6个月)。入学速度,每月4.0名研究参与者,与通过常规方法每月平均2.7名参与者相比,速度更快。该活动每天点击广告87次,其中1%的女性通过联系我们对我们的研究表现出兴趣。从点击到全员参与的整体转化率为0.2%。每位参与者的费用为112欧元。除了更高的年龄,社交媒体招募的参与者的人口统计与传统纳入的人群相当.定性分析确定了更多面向用户的注册程序和潜在的参与者利益作为社交媒体招聘的促进者。
    结论:这项研究表明,在SUI女性的试验中,社交媒体招募是可行的。它可以加速招募合格的参与者。优化注册程序以更好地满足参与者的需求和招聘福利可能会提高参与度和成本效益。试用注册ID2017-3540。
    OBJECTIVE: This study explores the opportunities of social media advertisements as a recruitment strategy in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
    METHODS: This feasibility study was part of a larger clinical trial on the effects of a patient decision aid for SUI treatment. We started a 61-day social media advertisement campaign to recruit women for the trial. The primary outcome of our study was enrolment pace. Secondary outcomes involved cost per participant, baseline demographic comparison and ad campaign performance metrics. Additionally, we interviewed recruited participants to identify the facilitators and barriers of our approach.
    RESULTS: Ten participants were recruited, of whom 8 completed the full study protocol (2 questionnaires 6 months apart). The enrolment pace, 4.0 study participants per month, was faster compared to the average of 2.7 participants per month through conventional methods. The campaign reached 87 clicks on the advertisement per day and 1 % of these women showed interest in our study by contacting us. The overall conversion rate from click to full participation was 0.2 %. The costs per participant were €112. Besides higher age, the demographics of the social media recruited participants were comparable to the conventional inclusions. Qualitative analysis identified more user-oriented enrolment procedures and potential participant benefit as facilitators of social media recruitment.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that social media recruitment can be feasible in trials for women with SUI. It can accelerate recruitment of eligible participants. Optimising the enrolment procedure to better meet participants\' needs and recruitment benefits may improve participation and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration ID 2017-3540.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:每年在意大利,流感影响约400万人。其中近5%的人住院。在疾病高峰期,医疗和经济体系面临巨大压力。本研究旨在从行政索赔数据中量化5个流行季节(2014-2019年)严重流感的临床和经济负担。
    方法:对2014年10月至2019年4月诊断为流感的住院患者进行分析。从4个意大利地方卫生部门(LHU)的健康相关管理数据库(AD)中检索了临床特征和管理信息。首次入学的日期被设置为索引日期(ID)。ID后六个月的随访期被认为是并发症和再次住院的原因。同时设定了回顾期(ID前2年)来评估潜在合并症的患病率.
    结果:在2,333例严重流感患者中,44.1%的成年人≥65岁,25.6%的年轻人年龄在0-17岁。46.8%有合并症(即,处于危险之中),主要是心血管和代谢性疾病(45.3%),和慢性病(24.7%)。住院率最高的是老年人(≥75)和年轻人(0-17),37.6和19.5/100,000居民/年,分别。平均住院时间为8天(IQR:14-4)。年龄较大的个体更高(≥65岁,11天,[17-6])和那些有合并症的人(9天,[16-6]),p值<0.001。同样,老年人和高危人群的死亡率较高(p值<0.001).12.7%的患者发生呼吸系统并发症,心血管疾病占5.9%。与流感相关的总费用为970万欧元,其中住院占95%。47.3%的住院费用与65岁以上的个体相关,52.9%与有风险的患者相关。每位患者的平均住院费用为4,007欧元。
    结论:这项回顾性研究表明,在2014-2019年意大利流感季节,极端年龄的人和那些有预先存在的医疗条件,更有可能因严重流感住院。加上并发症和衰老,它们使患者的预后恶化,并可能导致住院时间延长,从而提高医疗保健利用率和成本。我们的数据产生了关于流感负担的现实证据,有助于为公共卫生决策提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: Every year in Italy, influenza affects about 4 million people. Almost 5% of them are hospitalised. During peak illness, enormous pressure is placed on healthcare and economic systems. This study aims to quantify the clinical and economic burden of severe influenza during 5 epidemic seasons (2014-2019) from administrative claims data.
    METHODS: Patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of influenza between October 2014, and April 2019, were analyzed. Clinical characteristics and administrative information were retrieved from health-related Administrative Databases (ADs) of 4 Italian Local Health Units (LHUs). The date of first admission was set as the Index Date (ID). A follow-up period of six months after ID was considered to account for complications and re-hospitalizations, while a lookback period (2 years before ID) was set to assess the prevalence of underlying comorbidities.
    RESULTS: Out of 2,333 patients with severe influenza, 44.1% were adults ≥ 65, and 25.6% young individuals aged 0-17. 46.8% had comorbidities (i.e., were at risk), mainly cardiovascular and metabolic diseases (45.3%), and chronic conditions (24.7%). The highest hospitalization rates were among the elderly (≥ 75) and the young individuals (0-17), and were 37.6 and 19.5/100,000 inhabitants/year, respectively. The average hospital stay was 8 days (IQR: 14 - 4). It was higher for older individuals (≥ 65 years, 11 days, [17 - 6]) and for those with comorbidities (9 days, [16 - 6]), p-value < 0.001. Similarly, mortality was higher in elderly and those at risk (p-value < 0.001). Respiratory complications occurred in 12.7% of patients, and cardiovascular disorders in 5.9%. Total influenza-related costs were €9.7 million with hospitalization accounting for 95% of them. 47.3% of hospitalization costs were associated with individuals ≥ 65 and 52.9% with patients at risk. The average hospitalisation cost per patient was € 4,007.
    CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed that during the 2014-2019 influenza seasons in Italy, individuals of extreme ages and those with pre-existing medical conditions, were more likely to be hospitalized with severe influenza. Together with complications and ageing, they worsen patient\'s outcome and may lead to a prolonged hospitalization, thus increasing healthcare utilization and costs. Our data generate real-world evidence on the burden of influenza, useful to inform public health decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:毛利人(Aotearoa新西兰(NZ)的土著人民)比非毛利人更有可能遭受伤害,但不太可能有效获得公共资助的伤害护理服务。目前尚不清楚这种模式是否会延续到老年。这项回顾性研究分析了事故赔偿公司(ACC;国家无过失伤害赔偿计划)的索赔数据,以调查老年人(≥50岁)的意外伤害索赔和相关费用的种族差异。
    方法:回顾了2014年1月至2018年12月居住在新西兰两个地区的老年人的伤害索赔数据。计算并比较了毛利人和非毛利人的年龄标准化索赔率(每人每年)标准化比率。估计了行政协调会索赔费用(医疗;与收入有关的赔偿),比较两组的每项索赔的总费用和平均费用。
    结果:在64238人(9284毛利人;54954非毛利人)中,有149275项ACC索赔(18369毛利人;130906非毛利人)。非毛利人的ACC意外伤害索赔的年龄标准化率比毛利人高46%(95%CI44%至48%)。非毛利人的ACC支出为155277962新西兰元,而毛利人为30446673新西兰元。毛利人的平均索赔费用高得多(1658新西兰元对1186新西兰元,p<0.001)。
    结论:这项研究的结果突出了新西兰不同群体的老年人获得伤害补偿的方式的差异,表明有必要投资于针对老年毛利人的伤害预防措施,以及支持改善老年毛利人使用ACC的倡议。
    BACKGROUND: Māori (the Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ)) are more likely to experience injury than non-Māori, but less likely to have effective access to publicly funded injury care services. It is unknown if this pattern extends into older age. This retrospective study analysed Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC; national no-fault injury compensation scheme) claims data to investigate ethnic variation in unintentional injury claims and related costs for older adults (≥50 years).
    METHODS: Injury claims data for older adults residing in two regions of NZ between January 2014 and December 2018 were reviewed. Age-standardised claims rates (per person year) standardised rate ratios were calculated and compared between Māori and non-Māori. ACC claim costs (medical treatment; earning-related compensation) were estimated, with total and average costs per claim compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: There were 149 275 ACC claims (18 369 Māori; 130 906 non-Māori) among 64 238 individuals (9284 Māori; 54 954 non-Māori). The age-standardised rate of ACC claims for unintentional injury was 46% higher among non-Māori (95% CI 44% to 48%) than Māori. The ACC spend for non-Māori was NZ$155 277 962 compared with NZ$30 446 673 for Māori. Māori had a significantly higher average cost per claim (NZ$1658 vs NZ$1186, p<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study highlight differences in the manner in which different groups of older adults access injury compensation in NZ, indicating the need to invest in injury prevention initiatives that target older Māori, as well as initiatives supporting improved ACC access for older Māori.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈椎后路融合术(PCF)后的再入院率显着影响患者和医疗保健,并发症发生率为15%-5%,90天再入院率高达12%。在这项研究中,我们的目的是测试在识别再入院相关因素方面,捕获因素间相互作用的机器学习(ML)模型是否优于传统逻辑回归(LR).
    OptumClinformaticsDataMart数据库用于识别2004-2017年间接受PCF的患者。为了确定与30天再入院相关的因素,生成并评估了5个ML模型,包括多变量LR(MLR)模型。然后,表现最好的模型,梯度增压机(GBM),与LACE(患者住院时间,病人入院的能力,合并症,和紧急访问)关于算法实施潜在成本节约的指数。
    这项研究包括4,130名患者,其中874人在30天内再次入院。分析和缩放时,我们发现病人的出院状态,合并症,程序代码的数量是影响MLR的因素,而病人的出院状态,开票入场费,和住院时间影响GBM模型。GBM模型在预测非计划性再入院时显著优于MLR(受试者工作特征曲线下的平均面积,0.846vs.0.829;p<0.001),同时还预计平均比LACE指数节省50%的成本。
    五种型号(GBM,XGBoost[极端梯度提升],RF[随机森林],LASSO[最小绝对收缩和选择运算符],和MLR)进行了评估,其中,GBM模型表现出优越的预测性能,鲁棒性,和准确性。与再入院相关的因素对LR和GBM模型的影响不同,这表明这些模型可以互补使用。分析PCF程序时,对于与PCF并发症相关的再入院,GBM模型带来了更高的预测性能,并且与更高的理论成本节省相关.
    OBJECTIVE: Readmission rates after posterior cervical fusion (PCF) significantly impact patients and healthcare, with complication rates at 15%-25% and up to 12% 90-day readmission rates. In this study, we aim to test whether machine learning (ML) models that capture interfactorial interactions outperform traditional logistic regression (LR) in identifying readmission-associated factors.
    METHODS: The Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database was used to identify patients who underwent PCF between 2004-2017. To determine factors associated with 30-day readmissions, 5 ML models were generated and evaluated, including a multivariate LR (MLR) model. Then, the best-performing model, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), was compared to the LACE (Length patient stay in the hospital, Acuity of admission of patient in the hospital, Comorbidity, and Emergency visit) index regarding potential cost savings from algorithm implementation.
    RESULTS: This study included 4,130 patients, 874 of which were readmitted within 30 days. When analyzed and scaled, we found that patient discharge status, comorbidities, and number of procedure codes were factors that influenced MLR, while patient discharge status, billed admission charge, and length of stay influenced the GBM model. The GBM model significantly outperformed MLR in predicting unplanned readmissions (mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.846 vs. 0.829; p < 0.001), while also projecting an average cost savings of 50% more than the LACE index.
    CONCLUSIONS: Five models (GBM, XGBoost [extreme gradient boosting], RF [random forest], LASSO [least absolute shrinkage and selection operator], and MLR) were evaluated, among which, the GBM model exhibited superior predictive performance, robustness, and accuracy. Factors associated with readmissions impact LR and GBM models differently, suggesting that these models can be used complementarily. When analyzing PCF procedures, the GBM model resulted in greater predictive performance and was associated with higher theoretical cost savings for readmissions associated with PCF complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号