Coseal

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Tisseel影响的组织病理学检查,Cova,Glubran和Coseal,在脊柱外科手术中用于密封目的,针对硬膜外纤维化。
    在我们的研究中,将40只SpragueDawley大鼠随机分为五组,即第1组(n=8)对照组(椎板切除术);第2组(n=8)Cova组(椎板切除术+Cova);第3组(n=8)Tissel组(椎板切除术+Tisseel);第4组(n=8)对照组仅应用椎板切除术。在对其他组进行椎板切除术后,Cova被应用于第二组,Tissel到第三组,在手术领域,第4组的Coseal和第5组的Glubran。术后6周分别对大鼠进行笼内监测,提取相关的脊柱水平,对样本进行组织病理学检查,并对结果进行统计学评估。
    发现Tisseel和Glarwan组在纤维化分级方面与对照组相比有统计学上的显着差异,这对纤维化有积极的影响。与对照组相比,Cova组和Coseal组纤维化差异无统计学意义。
    由于脊柱外科手术中使用的硬脑膜粘合剂在统计学上没有显着增加脊髓硬膜外纤维化,我们得出的结论是,如果有必要,这些产品可以在脊柱手术中安全使用。
    UNASSIGNED: Histopathological examination of the effects of Tisseel, Cova, Glubran and Coseal, which are used for sealing purposes in spinal surgery practice, on epidural fibrosis is aimed.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups in our study as Group 1 (n=8) control group (Laminectomy); Group 2 (n=8) Cova group (Laminectomy + Cova); Group 3 (n=8) Tissel group (Laminectomy + Tisseel); Group 4 (n=8) Coseal group (Laminectomy + Coseal); and Group 5 Glubrane group (Laminectomy + Glubrane). Control group was only applied laminectomy. After laminectomy to other groups, Cova was applied to the 2nd group, Tissel to the 3rd group, Coseal to the 4th group and Glubran to the 5th group in surgical fields. After the rats were monitored in separate cages for 6 weeks after the operation, the relevant spinal level was extracted and the samples were examined histopathologically and the results were evaluated statistically.
    UNASSIGNED: It was found that there was a statistically significant difference in Tisseel and Glubran groups in terms of fibrosis grading compared to the control group, and this had a positive effect on fibrosis. Compared to the control group, there was no statistically significant difference on fibrosis in Cova and Coseal groups.
    UNASSIGNED: As dura adhesive agents used in spinal surgery practice did not increase spinal epidural fibrosis statistically significantly, we concluded that these products can be used safely during spinal surgery if necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨可再吸收聚乙二醇水凝胶(RPGH,Coseal)对大鼠椎板切除术后硬膜外纤维化(EF)的影响。
    将24只大鼠平均分为3组。在第一组中,椎板切除术后不应用治疗(对照组,组1)。在第二组中,椎板切除术后实现止血,将浸泡在盐水中的2mm可吸收明胶海绵放置在硬膜外腔上并闭合伤口(第2组)。在第三组中,椎板切除术后实现止血,和0.5毫升RPGH(Coseal,第3组)被挤压在硬脑膜上,伤口闭合了.进行了组织病理学检查以评估蛛网膜侵入和EF。
    与第1组相比,第2组和第3组的EF结果明显更低(分别为p=0.023和p=0.002)。在EF方面,第2组和第3组之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异(p=0.957)。三组平均蛛网膜侵犯率也无统计学差异(p>0.171)。然而,第3组中蛛网膜侵入率最低。
    术中封套,聚乙二醇聚合物,倾向于降低硬膜外纤维化的风险,尽管这在统计上并不显著。
    To investigate the histopathological effects of reabsorbable polyethylene glycol hydrogel (RPGH, Coseal) on epidural fibrosis (EF) following laminectomy in rats.
    A total of 24 rats were equally divided into three groups. In the first group, no treatment was applied after laminectomy (control group, Group 1). In the second group, hemostasis was achieved after laminectomy, and 2 mm absorbable gelatin sponge soaked in saline was placed over the epidural space and the wound was closed (Group 2). In the third group, hemostasis was achieved following laminectomy, and 0.5 mL RPGH (Coseal, Group 3) was squeezed over the dura mater, and the wound was closed. A histopathological examination was undertaken to evaluate arachnoidal invasion and EF.
    The results of EF in the Group 2 and Group 3 were significantly lower compared to the Group 1 (p = 0.023 and p = 0.002, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the Group 2 and Group 3 in terms of EF (p = 0.957). There was also no statistically significant difference between the mean arachnoidal invasion of the three groups (p > 0.171). However, the rate of arachnoidal invasion was the lowest in the Group 3.
    Intraoperative Coseal, a polyethylene glycol polymer, tends to reduce the risk of epidural fibrosis, although this is not statistically significant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号