Chemical weapons

化学武器
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    溶剂是能够引起严重皮肤损伤和全身毒性的化学战剂(CWAs)。褪黑激素,以其抗炎和抗氧化特性而闻名,可以减轻这些药物的影响。含有高褪黑素浓度(5%,50mg/g)使用生物相容性的质量设计方法进行优化,非刺激性赋形剂,粒径约为100nm。加载褪黑激素的SNEDDS显示出比常规褪黑激素乳膏高43倍的渗透性。在环境温度(25°C)下的化学稳定性保持一年。将使用简单混合方法制备优化的褪黑激素负载的SNEDDS与微流体微混合器进行了比较。使用3D打印(熔融沉积建模或立体光刻)T形环形微流控芯片(具有通过计算流体动力学优化的通道几何形状)成功实现了混合,导致可扩展的,与其他常规混合方法相比,首次连续过程的制备时间显着减少。在关键质量属性方面没有观察到统计学上的显著差异,如颗粒大小和褪黑激素负载,在水浴中达到平衡溶解度的常规混合方法和使用3D打印微混合器之间。这种可扩展的,连续,具有成本效益的方法提高了SNEDDS生产的整体效率,降低了多批次的质量控制成本,并展示了在军事基地等护理点使用易于定制的3D打印微混合器进行微流体制造的潜力。
    Vesicants are chemical warfare agents (CWAs) capable of causing severe skin damage and systemic toxicity. Melatonin, known for its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, can mitigate the effects of these agents. Self-nano-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) containing a high melatonin concentration (5 %, 50 mg/g) were optimized using a quality-by-design approach from biocompatible, non-irritant excipients with a particle size of about 100 nm. The melatonin-loaded SNEDDS showed a 43-fold greater permeability than a conventional melatonin cream. Chemical stability at ambient temperature (25 °C) was maintained for one year. The preparation of optimised melatonin-loaded SNEDDS using a simple mixing method was compared to microfluidic micromixers. Mixing was successfully achieved using a 3D-printed (fused deposition modeling or stereolithography) T-shaped toroidal microfluidic chip (with a channel geometry optimized by computational fluid dynamics), resulting in a scalable, continuous process for the first time with a substantial reduction in preparation time compared to other conventional mixing approaches. No statistically significant differences were observed in the key quality attributes, such as particle size and melatonin loading, between mixing method till kinetic equilibrium solubility is reached and mixing using the 3D-printed micromixers. This scalable, continuous, cost-effective approach improves the overall efficiency of SNEDDS production, reduces the cost of quality control for multiple batches, and demonstrates the potential of continuous microfluidic manufacture with readily customizable 3D-printed micromixers at points of care, such as military bases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解剧毒化合物的基本物理特性及其在不同环境中的行为在评估其危险中起着至关重要的作用。此外,这些知识有助于制定收集与有害化学品滥用有关的法医证据的协议。2018年,前俄罗斯间谍谢尔盖·斯克里帕尔和他的女儿在索尔兹伯里被毒死,英格兰,一种后来被鉴定为非常规神经毒剂A-234的物质。在Skripal家中的物品上发现了该化合物的污染。本文的目的是确定A-234在选定的室内表面上的持久性。陶瓷,铝罐,层压刨花板,聚氯乙烯(PVC)地板砖,聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)瓶,使用丙烯酸涂料和计算机键盘作为矩阵。监测表面污染的减少和化合物的进一步命运持续12周。持久性确定涉及优化擦除采样方法。同时,密切监测从表面的蒸发和污染物向基质的渗透。实验结果表明,神经毒剂表现出显著的持久性,特别是在不可渗透的表面。值得注意的是,A-234的蒸发过程在决定其命运方面起着次要作用,仅在固体上方观察到可检测的浓度,无孔表面,如陶瓷和铝可以。表面持久性半衰期差异显著,从12分钟到478天,取决于材料。这篇文章对应急响应协议有影响,净化策略,公共卫生和犯罪现场调查。
    Understanding the fundamental physical characteristics of extremely toxic compounds and their behavior across different environments plays a crucial role in assessing their danger. Additionally, this knowledge informs the development of protocols for gathering forensic evidence related to harmful chemicals misuse. In 2018, former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter were poisoned in Salisbury, England, with a substance later identified as the unconventional nerve agent A-234. Contamination with the compound was found on items inside Skripal\'s home. The aim of this paper was to determine the persistence of A-234 on selected indoor surfaces. Ceramics, aluminum can, laminated chipboard, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) floor tile, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle, acrylic paint and computer keyboard were used as matrices. The decrease in surface contamination and further fate of the compound was monitored for 12 weeks. Persistence determination involved optimizing the wipe sampling method. Simultaneously, evaporation from the surface and permeation of the contaminant into the matrix were closely monitored. The experimental findings indicate that the nerve agent exhibits remarkable persistence, particularly on impermeable surfaces. Notably, the process of A-234 evaporation plays a minor role in determining its fate, with detectable concentrations observed solely above solid, non-porous surfaces such as ceramics and aluminum can. The surface persistence half-life varied significantly, ranging from 12 min to 478 days, depending on the material. The article has implications for emergency response protocols, decontamination strategies, public health and crime scene investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在有化学战暴露史的患者中,通过计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描诊断小气道疾病具有挑战性。我们开发了基于不同方法的软件包,以识别和量化CT图像中的小气道疾病。主要目的是确定在化学战的伊朗-伊拉克战争受害者的CT扫描中检测小气道疾病的最佳自动方法。
    方法:这项回顾性病例对照研究纳入了46例有化学战暴露史的患者和27例对照患者的吸气/呼气(I/E)CT扫描和肺活量测定测试。图像数据被自动分割,使用本地开发的软件将吸气图像配准到呼气图像帧中。在CT图像上进行参数响应映射(PRM)和空气捕集指数(ATI)映射。常规QCT方法,包括呼气/吸气平均肺衰减(E/IMLA)比,正常密度E/I(NDE/I)MLA比,衰减容积指数(AVI),呼气扫描中%低衰减区域(LAA)<-856,还计算了吸入扫描中的%LAA<-950。QCT测量值与肺活量测定结果相关,并在两个研究组中进行比较。
    结果:相关分析表明,三个空气捕集(AT)测量值(PRM,ATI,和%LAAExp<-856)和肺活量测定参数(Fev1,Fvc,Fev1/Fvc,和MMEF)。此外,%LAAExp<-856与Fev1/Fvc呈显著负相关(r=-0.643,P值<0.001)。三个AT测量表明研究组之间存在显著差异。两组之间的E/I比值也有显著差异(P值<0.001)。二元逻辑回归模型显示PRMFsad,%LAAExp<-856,ATI是研究结果的显著和强有力的预测因子。PRMFsad的最佳切点=19%,%LAAExp<-856=23%,ATI=27%的参与者被确定为具有高准确性的两组。
    结论:QCT方法,包括PRM,ATI,和%LAAExp<-856可以极大地促进化学战受害者SAD的识别和量化。结果应在精心设计的涉及大量人口的前瞻性研究中得到验证。
    Diagnosis of small airway disease on computed tomography (CT) scans is challenging in patients with a history of chemical warfare exposure. We developed a software package based on different methodologies to identify and quantify small airway disease in CT images. The primary aim was to identify the best automatic methodology for detecting small airway disease in CT scans of Iran-Iraq War victims of chemical warfare.
    This retrospective case-control study enrolled 46 patients with a history of chemical warfare exposure and 27 controls with inspiratory/expiratory (I/E) CT scans and spirometry tests. Image data were automatically segmented, and inspiratory images were registered into the expiratory images\' frame using the locally developed software. Parametric response mapping (PRM) and air trapping index (ATI) mapping were performed on the CT images. Conventional QCT methods, including expiratory/inspiratory mean lung attenuation (E/I MLA) ratio, normal density E/I (ND E/I) MLA ratio, attenuation volume Index (AVI), %low attenuation areas (LAA) < -856 in exhale scans, and %LAA < -950 in inhale scans were also computed. QCT measurements were correlated with spirometry results and compared across the two study groups.
    The correlation analysis showed a significant negative relationship between three air trapping (AT) measurements (PRM, ATI, and %LAAExp < -856) and spirometry parameters (Fev1, Fvc, Fev1/Fvc, and MMEF). Moreover, %LAAExp < -856 had the highest significant negative correlation with Fev1/Fvc (r = -0.643, P-value < 0.001). Three AT measurements demonstrated a significant difference between the study groups. The E/I ratio was also significantly different between the two groups (P-value < 0.001). Binary logistic regression models showed PRMFsad, %LAAExp < -856, and ATI as significant and strong predictors of the study outcome. Optimal cut-points for PRMFsad = 19%, %LAAExp < -856 = 23%, and ATI = 27% were identified to classify the participants into two groups with high accuracy.
    QCT methods, including PRM, ATI, and %LAAExp < -856 can greatly advance the identification and quantification of SAD in chemical warfare victims. The results should be verified in well-designed prospective studies involving a large population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    背景:最近的新闻指出国家领土上可能发生武装冲突。
    背景:在这种情况下,肺科医师很可能在照顾伤者方面发挥重要作用,尤其是胸部损伤是患者死亡的主要原因。
    结论:肺科医师可能需要治疗的主要伤害不仅来自爆炸,但也来自化学,生物和核危险。在这篇文章中,解决了相关的组织和教学方面的问题。由于在这个问题上的详尽无遗是无法实现的,我们建议为感兴趣的从业者提供特定主题的培训。
    结论:法国卫生系统在武装冲突局势中的复原力取决于有关各方的积极参与。考虑到这一点,最重要的是,使肺炎社区对与战争有关的伤害的潜在可预测的严重程度敏感。
    BACKGROUND: Recent news points to the eventuality of an armed conflict on the national territory.
    BACKGROUND: In this situation, pulmonologists will in all likelihood have a major role to assume in caring for the injured, especially insofar as chest damage is a major cause of patient death.
    CONCLUSIONS: The main injuries that pulmonologists may be called upon to treat stem not only from explosions, but also from chemical, biological and nuclear hazards. In this article, relevant organizational and pedagogical aspects are addressed. Since exhaustiveness on this subject is unattainable, we are proposing training on specific subjects for interested practitioners.
    CONCLUSIONS: The resilience of the French health system in a situation of armed conflict depends on the active participation of all concerned parties. With this in mind, it is of prime importance that the pneumological community be sensitized to the potential predictable severity of war-related injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    现代化学武器和化学战的出现传统上与第一次世界大战有关,但是毒药在军队中的使用在过去有很深的根源。这些毒物的来源一直是天然药物,也可以用作药物。毒药和药物之间的关系,如今,在化学战和医学之间,或者在军事化学和药学之间,似乎对于理解这两种现象的历史和可能的未来都非常重要。本文着眼于使用毒品作为化学武器的一些历史例子,相反,使用化学武器作为药物。它寻求对与执行《化学武器公约》特别相关的一些问题的答案,旨在实现一个没有化学战的世界。
    The emergence of modern chemical weapons and chemical warfare is traditionally associated with World War I, but the use of poisons in the military has its roots deep in the past. The sources of these poisons have always been natural agents that also served as medicines. This relationship between poison and medicine, and nowadays between chemical warfare and medicine, or between \'military chemistry\' and pharmacy, appears to be very important for understanding not only the history but also the possible future of both phenomena. This article looks at some historical examples of the use of drugs as chemical weapons and, conversely, the use of chemical weapons as medicines. It seeks to find answers to some questions that are particularly relevant to the implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention, which aims to achieve a world without chemical warfare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    科学技术的发展改善了人类的健康和福祉,例如用更好的方法来检测和治疗疾病。然而,一些进展导致了大规模毁灭性武器的发展:化学和生物武器。虽然被国际条约禁止,近年来,化学武器被用于暗杀和叙利亚内战。此外,生物武器成为最近怀疑和指控的主题。虽然不限于这些领域,所谓的双重用途潜力-具有仁慈或恶意意图的应用方面的可能性-在生命科学中尤其明显。这里,我们展示了在会议系列中探索的一些领域SpiezCONVERGENCE,以促进科学之间的交流,军备控制和国际安全。一起,这些社区讨论了生命科学进步对《化学和生物武器公约》的潜在影响。通过数字技术实现,DNA测序和合成为(重新)构建病毒和细胞提供了工具箱,这在COVID-19大流行期间表现出无价,但有滥用风险,允许故意引发疫情。开放的数据库和算法可用于生成新的化学武器。我们认为,防止生命科学研究的意外后果,同时促进其与负责任的科学的好处,需要了解和反思参与研究过程的每个人的意外风险。禁止化学武器和生物武器的力度还取决于科学家与政策制定者互动,评估风险并实施减少风险的措施。
    Developments in science and technology improve health and wellbeing of humankind, for example with better methods to detect and treat diseases. However, some advances have led to the development of weapons of mass destruction: chemical and biological weapons. Although banned by international treaties, chemical weapons have been used in recent years in assassinations and the Syrian civil war. Additionally, biological weapons became the subject of recent suspicions and allegations. While not limited to these fields, the so-called dual-use potential-the possibility to apply aspects both with benevolent or malevolent intentions-is especially pronounced in the life sciences. Here, we showcase some areas explored at the conference series Spiez CONVERGENCE that facilitates an exchange between science, arms control and international security. Together, these communities discuss the potential impact of life scientific advances on the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions. Enabled by digital technologies, DNA sequencing and synthesis provide the toolbox to (re)construct viruses and cells, which demonstrated invaluable during the COVID-19 pandemic but bear the misuse risk to allow intentionally triggering an outbreak. Open databases and algorithms could be used to generate new chemical weapons. We argue that preventing unintended consequences of life science research while promoting its benefits with responsible science, requires awareness and reflection about unexpected risks of everyone involved in the research process. The strength of the ban of chemical and biological weapons also depends on scientists interacting with policy makers in evaluating risks and implementing measures to reduce them.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年11月,《化学武器公约》历史上首次对化学品附件附表1进行了更改。虽然科学文献中很少有关于这些新计划的化学物质,氨基甲酸酯,具体来说,证明有很大不同,就其化学成分和毒理学作用而言,来自所有其他计划的神经毒剂,尚未在文献中得到充分报道。在这里,我们提供了有关附表1中包含的氨基甲酸酯以及类似的其他氨基甲酸酯的可用信息的文献综述,并概述了它们作为胆碱酯酶抑制剂的效用和功能及其毒性。尽管在文献中缺乏与这些新计划的季铵和双季氨基甲酸酯和/或其生物标志物的检测相关的研究,有关氨基甲酸酯农药的可用信息可能是进一步假定适合的检测方法的可靠起点。最后,我们注意到这些新计划的氨基甲酸酯对不扩散和裁军界的一些影响。
    In November 2019, for the first time in the history of the Chemical Weapons Convention, changes were made to Schedule 1 of the Annex on Chemicals. While there is little in the scientific literature regarding any of these newly scheduled chemicals, the carbamates, specifically, prove to be substantially different, both in terms of their chemical composition and their toxicological effects, from all the other scheduled nerve agents and have yet to be fully reported on in the literature. Herein, we present a literature review of the available information on carbamates included in Schedule 1, as well as analogous other carbamates, and provide a summary of their utility and function as cholinesterase inhibitors in general and their toxicities. Though there is a paucity of studies in the literature related to the detection of these newly scheduled quaternary and bisquaternary carbamates and/or their biomarkers, information available on carbamate pesticides may be a solid starting point to further postulate amenable detection methodologies. Lastly, we note some implications of these newly scheduled carbamates for the nonproliferation and disarmament community.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在涉及化学战剂或更广泛的化学事件之后,化学武器,处理受污染物证的传统法医分析有两种可能的方法。首先是在安全条件下(即在专门处理此类物质的实验室中)分析受污染的物品,而第二种则依赖于在传统法医实验室处理之前的物品去污。后者的主要限制之一是由去污过程引起的痕迹的可能降解或破坏。因此,至关重要的是,要尽可能多地了解不同去污剂和程序对痕迹的影响。这项研究提供了在化学事故中通常使用的去污剂应用后玻璃上指纹恢复的实验结果。11种去污剂对沉积在玻璃上的指纹和随后用氰基丙烯酸酯和小颗粒试剂(SPR)增强的影响由四个评估者评估(通过视觉检查)。研究结果表明,指纹在玻璃上的持久性高度取决于所用净化剂的类型。基于亲核取代原理中和有毒化学物质的去污剂允许随后用SPR良好地形成指纹。粉状去污剂没有显示任何指印改变的迹象,而用氧化剂去污会导致不同的结果。
    Following a chemical incident involving chemical warfare agents or more broadly, chemical weapons, there are two possible approaches in dealing with the traditional forensic analysis of contaminated exhibits. The first is to analyze the contaminated items under safe conditions (i.e. in laboratories dedicated to the handling of such substances), while the second relies on item decontamination prior to processing them in traditional forensic laboratories. One of the main limitations of the latter is the possible degradation or destruction of traces caused by the decontamination process. Hence, it is crucial to have as much information as possible on the impact of different decontamination agents and procedures on traces. This research presents experimental results on the recovery of fingermarks on glass after the application of decontaminants typically used in case of chemical incidents. The impact of 11 decontaminants on fingermarks deposited on glass and on the subsequent enhancement with cyanoacrylate and Small Particle Reagent (SPR) was evaluated (by visual examination) by four evaluators. The results of the study demonstrated that the persistence of fingermarks on glass is highly dependent on the type of decontaminant used. Decontamination agents based on the principle of nucleophilic substitution to neutralize toxic chemicals allowed good subsequent development of fingermarks with SPR. Powdered decontaminants did not show any indication of alteration of fingermarks, whereas decontamination with oxidants leads to variable results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    俄罗斯联邦无端入侵乌克兰,造成了二战以来欧洲最大的人道主义危机。随着整个乌克兰的战斗愈演愈烈,人们越来越担心俄罗斯联邦可能考虑对乌克兰的军事人员和平民直接使用化学或放射性武器。尽管1997年《化学武器公约》禁止使用化学武器,但最近的证据表明,国家行为者将继续使用这些特工作为战争和恐怖武器,尽管公开否认他们的使用。我们审查了俄罗斯联邦(或其盟国)生产和使用的化学武器,以确定俄罗斯在乌克兰战争中的合理风险。我们还提供快速评估和治疗指南,以识别和管理这些急性暴露。
    The unprovoked invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation has resulted in the largest humanitarian crisis in Europe since World War II. As fighting intensifies throughout Ukraine, there is an increasing concern that the Russian Federation may consider the direct use of chemical or radiological weapons against military personnel and civilians in Ukraine. Despite prohibition of chemical weapons from the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1997, recent evidence has demonstrated that state actors will continue to use these agents as weapons of war and terror, despite publicly denying their use. We review chemical weapons produced and used by the Russian Federation (or its allies) to identify plausible risks in the Russian war in Ukraine. We also provide rapid assessment and treatment guidelines to recognize and manage these acute exposures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在恐怖袭击中使用化学武器,虽然罕见,由于他们有能力造成大量人员伤亡,仍然是一个重大挑战和关切。化学攻击仍然是灾难医学(DM)和反恐医学(CTM)专家感兴趣的话题,显然是需要加强准备的领域。这项研究旨在提供所有使用化学制剂作为主要武器的与恐怖主义有关的攻击的流行病学描述,从1970年持续到2019年。这些数据将有助于CTM中教育计划的发展,并提供有关如何为未来的潜在攻击做好准备的见解。
    方法:使用全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD)的回顾性数据库搜索进行数据收集。从1970年1月1日至2019年12月31日,使用内部数据库搜索功能搜索所有使用化学武器作为主要攻击方法的事件。在研究时,2020年和2021年尚未公布。GTD还详细介绍了使用的特定化学物质,当已知时,在事件摘要中。结果导出到Excel电子表格中(微软公司;雷德蒙德,华盛顿美国)进行分析。
    结果:从1970年至2019年,总共记录了292起涉及化学制剂作为主要攻击方法的恐怖袭击,记录了284人死亡和13,267人受伤。酸(52)是最常用的化学试剂,后跟“未指明的毒药”(43),“未知化学制剂”(29),“未指定气体”(27),催泪瓦斯(27),氯气(24),氰化物(21),汞(9),胡椒喷雾或狼牙棒(9),芥子气(8),杀虫剂或1080(8),二苯胺氯砷(7),磷酸盐或磷(3),氢氧化钠或腐蚀性液体(3),沙林(2),“未指定药物”(2),VX神经毒气和其他神经毒气(2),农药(2),清洁化学品/油漆稀释剂(2),氨(2),麻醉剂(1),砷(1),氯气和芥子气混合物(1),氯化吩嗪(1),鼠药(1),未知刺激性气体(1),盐酸和氰化钠的混合物(1),未知白色粉末(1),防腐染料(1),以及氯气和白磷混合物(1)。
    结论:在战争中使用化学武器,尽管《化学武器公约》(CWC)禁止,仍然是一种罕见但令人担忧的恐怖袭击方法。近年来,在平民环境中使用了更多可能致命的化学物质。两用工业化学品,特别是,构成重大关切。酸是52次攻击中最常用的化学武器。催泪瓦斯,氯,和氰化物分别用于20多次攻击。DM和CTM专家都主张对平民环境中的故意事件进行更好的准备和响应培训。
    BACKGROUND: The use of chemical weapons in terrorist attacks, though rare, remains a significant challenge and concern due to their ability to inflict mass casualties. Chemical attacks remain a topic of interest for Disaster Medicine (DM) and Counter-Terrorism Medicine (CTM) specialists and are clearly an area in need of enhanced preparedness. This study aims to provide an epidemiological description of all terrorism-related attacks using chemical agents as a primary weapon, sustained from 1970 - 2019. These data will be useful in the development of education programs in CTM and provide an insight into how best to prepare for potential attacks in the future.
    METHODS: Data collection was performed using a retrospective database search through the Global Terrorism Database (GTD). The GTD was searched using the internal database search functions for all events using chemical weapons as a primary attack method from January 1, 1970 - December 31, 2019. Years 2020 and 2021 were not yet available at the time of the study. The GTD also details the specific chemical used, when known, in the summary of incidents. Results were exported into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp.; Redmond, Washington USA) for analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 292 terrorist attacks involving chemical agents as a primary attack method were recorded from 1970 - 2019, registering 284 deaths and 13,267 injuries. Acid (52) was the most commonly used chemical agent, followed by \"unspecified poison\" (43), \"unknown chemical agents\" (29), \"unspecified gas\" (27), tear gas (27), chlorine gas (24), cyanide (21), mercury (9), pepper spray or mace (9), mustard gas (8), insecticide or 1080 (8), diphenylamine chloroarsine (7), phosphate or phosphorous (3), sodium hydroxide or corrosive liquid (3), sarin (2), \"unspecified drugs\" (2), VX nerve gas and other nerve gas (2), pesticides (2), cleaning chemicals/paint thinner (2), ammonia (2), anesthesia agent (1), arsenic (1), chlorine and mustard gas mix (1), phenarsazine chloride (1), rat poison (1), unknown irritative gas (1), hydrochloric acid and sodium cyanide mix (1), unknown white powder (1), antiseptic dye (1), and chlorine gas and white phosphorous mix (1).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of chemical weapons in warfare, though prohibited by the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), remains a rare but concerning terrorist attack methodology. In recent years, there have been more instances where potentially deadly chemicals have been used in civilian settings. Dual use industrial chemicals, in particular, pose a significant concern. Acid was the most commonly used chemical weapon in 52 attacks. Tear gas, chlorine, and cyanide were each used in over 20 attacks. Both DM and CTM specialists advocate for better preparedness and response training for intentional events in civilian settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号