Central Nervous System Stimulants

中枢神经系统兴奋剂
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前已显示哌醋甲酯(MPH)可增加体重正常的个体的静息能量消耗(REE);然而,对肥胖患者的影响目前尚不清楚.10名肥胖患者被随机分配接受60天的MPH给药,每日剂量为0.5mg/kg体重或安慰剂对照。在60天干预前后测量REE。对于REE(p=0.082),具有较大的效应大小(η2=0.331),与安慰剂对照相比,MPH给药增加REE。这项初步研究的初步结果表明,MPH有可能对抗体重减轻中常见的适应性产热过程。这是药物疗法中的一个独特发现,因为没有批准的肥胖药物可测量地影响REE。
    Methylphenidate (MPH) has been previously shown to increase resting energy expenditure (REE) in individuals of normal weight; however, the effects on individuals living with obesity are currently unknown. Ten individuals living with obesity were randomly assigned to undergo 60 days of MPH administration with a daily dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight or a placebo control. REE was measured before and after the 60-day intervention. There was a trend toward significance for group × time interaction on REE (p = 0.082) with a large effect size (η2 = 0.331), with MPH administration increasing REE compared to a decrease in placebo control. Preliminary findings from this pilot study show that MPH has the potential to counter the adaptive thermogenic process commonly seen in weight loss. This is a unique finding among pharmacotherapies, as no approved obesity drugs measurably impact REE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Caffeine is one of the most widely consumed pharmacological substances globally, and is known for its potential ergogenic effects. This study examined the impact of caffeine on the blood pressure in athletic and non-athletic women. Caffeine, a CNS stimulant, enhances athletic performance by boosting stamina, alertness, and cognitive speed. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of caffeine on heart rate and blood pressure in both athletic and non-athletic women, and to inform both groups about its effects. The study was conducted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and involved 30 volunteers aged 18-30 years. Participants were equally divided into three groups: athletes who consumed caffeine, non-athletes who consumed caffeine, and a control group (given a placebo). After caffeine ingestion, there were no significant differences in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), or heart rate between athletes and non-athletes. These findings suggest that caffeine consumption does not significantly affect blood pressure in either athletic or non-athletic women. However, if it raises blood pressure in both groups, it could pose risks, prompting athletes to consider alternative hydration options such as Gatorade.
    La caféine est l\'une des substances pharmacologiques les plus largement consommées dans le monde, et est connue pour ses effets ergogéniques potentiels. Cette étude a examiné l\'impact de la caféine sur la pression artérielle des femmes athlètes et non athlètes. La caféine, un stimulant du système nerveux central, améliore les performances des athlètes en augmentant l\'endurance, la vigilance et la vitesse cognitive. L\'objectif de cette étude était d\'évaluer l\'impact de la caféine sur la fréquence cardiaque et la pression artérielle chez les femmes athlètes et non athlètes, et d\'informer les deux groupes de ses effets. L\'étude a été menée au Royaume d\'Arabie saoudite et a impliqué 30 volontaires âgés de 18 à 30 ans. Les participants ont été répartis également en trois groupes : des athlètes qui ont consommé de la caféine, des non-athlètes qui ont consommé de la caféine, et un groupe témoin (ayant reçu un placebo). Après l\'ingestion de caféine, il n\'y avait pas de différences significatives dans la pression artérielle diastolique (PAD), la pression artérielle systolique (PAS) ou la fréquence cardiaque entre les athlètes et les non-athlètes. Ces résultats suggèrent que la consommation de caféine n\'affecte pas significativement la pression artérielle chez les femmes, qu\'elles soient athlètes ou non. Cependant, si elle augmente la pression artérielle dans les deux groupes, cela pourrait présenter des risques, incitant les athlètes à envisager des options d\'hydratation alternatives, telles que le Gatorade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    方法:DL是一个8岁的墨西哥男孩,患有后房间隔缺损,右下肺静脉部分异常肺静脉回流,导致右心扩张,右心室收缩和舒张功能正常,无心律失常。手术修复被推迟,DL的病情正在接受呋塞米0.5mg/kgBID和螺内酯0.5mg/kgBID的医学治疗。由于取消COVID-19大流行限制并重返面对面课程后在学校表现不佳,DL提出了发展评估。他已经参加了3个月的全日制课程,数学没有进步,阅读,和写作技巧。当前学校的注意力问题包括无法完成任务而不会被最小的刺激和高度冲动的行为分散注意力。在第一次评估时,DL的表现低于预期等级(例如,在没有文本理解的情况下按音节阅读,展示操作前加减技能,无法听写)-所有这些都被视为注意力不足的负面影响。DL符合ADHD的DSM-5标准,主要是注意力不集中的类型。他在早上8点开始服用10毫克速释哌醋甲酯PO,早餐后4小时服用第二剂10毫克速释哌醋甲酯PO。一个月后,在第一次后续咨询中,注意力跨度的提高,冲动,并观察了学校的表现,包括阅读能力和数学能力。然而,DL\的母亲在外面玩耍后,对双手手指的包络线发紫和肩发紫表示担忧。这些迹象以前没有观察到。在同一次访问的体检中,心率,血压,血氧饱和度在基线范围内,心脏检查无变化.在早餐(上午8点)的早晨,将DL\的哌醋甲酯剂量降低至10mg速释哌醋甲酯POQD。DL又两个月没有回到诊所,由于经济限制,在治疗2个月后停药。他的母亲报告说,在他停药期间,DL的劳力性包络线发紫和肩发紫得以解决。然而,她观察到注意力不集中的症状和冲动的增加以及他的学术技能的下降。她问我们的团队是否能够继续治疗,尽管有药物副作用,因为她相信利大于弊。鉴于这些担忧,研究小组要求更新心脏病学评估.心脏病专家建议停用哌醋甲酯,并建议对心胸外科手术进行随访,以重新评估手术时间表。鉴于墨西哥的治疗选择有限,作为治疗发育行为的临床医生,你下一步会做什么...?
    METHODS: DL is an 8-year-old Mexican boy with a posterior atrial septal defect and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return of the right lower pulmonary vein with resultant right heart dilation with normal right ventricular systolic and diastolic function and no arrhythmias. Surgical repair was deferred, and DL\'s condition was being medically managed with furosemide 0.5 mg/kg BID and spironolactone 0.5 mg/kg BID.DL presents for developmental assessment due to poor performance in school following a lifting of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and return to in-person classes. He has been attending full-time classes for 3 months without improvements in math, reading, and writing skills. Current attentional concerns at school include an inability to complete tasks without getting distracted by minimal stimuli and highly impulsive behavior.At the first assessment, DL was performing below grade expectations (e.g., reading by syllable without text comprehension, demonstrating preoperational addition and subtraction skills, inability to take dictation)-all of which was viewed as negatively impacted by attentional deficits. DL met DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, predominantly inattentive type. He was started on 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO at 8 am with breakfast and a second dose of 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO 4 hours after the first dose.After a month, at the first follow-up consultation, improvement in attention span, impulsivity, and school performance were observed, including reading skills and math proficiency. However, DL\'s mother raised concerns about circumoral cyanosis and acrocyanosis in the fingers of both hands after playing outside. These signs were not previously observed. During physical examination at the same visit, heart rate, blood pressure, and oximetry were within baseline ranges and his cardiac examination was unchanged. DL\'s dosage of methylphenidate was lowered to 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO QD in the mornings with breakfast (8 am).DL did not return to clinic for another 2 months, having discontinued the medication after 2 months of treatment given financial limitations. His mother reported that DL\'s exertional circumoral cyanosis and acrocyanosis resolved while he was off medication. However, she observed an increase in inattentive symptoms and impulsivity and decline in his academic skills. She asked if our team was able continue the treatment despite the drug side effects, since she believed the benefits outweighed the disadvantages.Given these concerns, the team requested an updated cardiology assessment. The Cardiologist recommended discontinuation of methylphenidate and recommended follow-up with cardiothoracic surgery for reassessment of the surgical timeline.Given the limited treatment options in Mexico, what would you do next as the treating developmental-behavioral clinician…?
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:默认模式网络(DMN)是一个中央神经网络,最近的证据表明它由功能不同的子网络组成。哌醋甲酯(MPH)的给药已被证明可以调节冲动行为,尽管目前尚不清楚这些影响是否与MPH引起的DMN连通性变化有关。为了解决这个差距,我们评估了MPH给药对不同DMN子网络内部和之间的功能连接模式的影响,并测试了与冲动性子量表变异性的假定关系.
    方法:55名惯用右手的健康成年人接受了两次静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)扫描,急性给予MPH(20mg)或安慰剂后,通过随机双盲安慰剂对照设计。基于MPH的影响,实现了图模块化分析,将DMN分成不同的子网络(与安慰剂)与其他神经网络的DMN连接模式。
    结果:MPH管理导致DMN连通性整体下降,尤其是听觉,cinguloopercular,和躯体运动网络,并增加了与顶内拨号网络的连接。图分析表明,DMN可以分为两个不同的子网,一个表现出MPH诱导的连通性增加,另一个表现出降低的连通性。MPH给药后,DMN子网络与cinguloopercular网络的连通性降低与冲动性和非计划性冲动性升高有关。
    结论:目前的研究结果强调了MPH给药对DMNrs-fMRI连接的复杂影响,揭示其对不同DMN子部门的相反影响。MPH诱导的DMN连接模式与其他神经网络的动力学可能解释了MPH管理对脉冲行为的一些影响。
    BACKGROUND: The Default Mode Network (DMN) is a central neural network, with recent evidence indicating that it is composed of functionally distinct sub-networks. Methylphenidate (MPH) administration has been shown before to modulate impulsive behavior, though it is not yet clear whether these effects relate to MPH-induced changes in DMN connectivity. To address this gap, we assessed the impact of MPH administration on functional connectivity patterns within and between distinct DMN sub-networks and tested putative relations to variability in sub-scales of impulsivity.
    METHODS: Fifty-five right-handed healthy adults underwent two resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) scans, following acute administration of either MPH (20 mg) or placebo, via a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design. Graph modularity analysis was implemented to fractionate the DMN into distinct sub-networks based on the impact of MPH (vs. placebo) on DMN connectivity patterns with other neural networks.
    RESULTS: MPH administration led to an overall decreased DMN connectivity, particularly with the auditory, cinguloopercular, and somatomotor networks, and increased connectivity with the parietomedial network. Graph analysis revealed that the DMN could be fractionated into two distinct sub-networks, with one exhibiting MPH-induced increased connectivity and the other decreased connectivity. Decreased connectivity of the DMN sub-network with the cinguloopercular network following MPH administration was associated with elevated impulsivity and non-planning impulsiveness.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current findings highlight the intricate effects of MPH administration on DMN rs-fMRI connectivity, uncovering its opposing impact on distinct DMN sub-divisions. MPH-induced dynamics in DMN connectivity patterns with other neural networks may account for some of the effects of MPH administration on impulsive behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾上腺素能神经递质再摄取抑制剂在治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)方面越来越受到重视。由于它们对去甲肾上腺素的影响,多巴胺,和5-羟色胺神经传递,与兴奋剂相比,它们对ADHD和合并症均有益处,并具有其他一些优势,包括作用持续时间更长,不良反应更少.在治疗ADHD中具有新的作用机制的这些药剂持续存在兴趣。
    作者使用以下关键字进行了PubMed文献检索:\'ADHD\'和\'肾上腺素能再摄取抑制剂\'或\'非兴奋剂\'或\'托莫西汀\'或\'维恶嗪\'或\'达索曲林\'或\'Centanafadine\'\'PDC-1421\'或\'瑞洛沙芬他们回顾了FDA关于安全性/耐受性研究可用药物的概况,并回顾了已发表的这些药物治疗ADHD的临床研究。
    肾上腺素能神经递质再摄取抑制剂适合患有ADHD的儿童和青少年的不同需求,1)对兴奋剂的耐受性差(例如由于生长抑制,失眠,反弹烦躁,共病抑郁症,焦虑和抽动障碍,药物滥用或转移关注),2)心脏风险,和/或3)需要延长行动期限。它们在受体亲和力和调节作用方面的差异支持了个体药剂的独特益处。
    UNASSIGNED: Adrenergic neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitors are gaining attention in treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Due to their effects on norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin neurotransmission, they benefit both ADHD and comorbid disorders and have some other advantages including longer duration of action and fewer adverse effects compared to stimulants. There is continued interest in these agents with novel mechanisms of action in treatment of ADHD.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors conducted a PubMed literature search using the following key words: \'ADHD\' AND \'adrenergic reuptake inhibitors\' OR \'nonstimulants\' OR \'atomoxetine\' OR \'Viloxazine\' OR \'Dasotraline\' OR \'Centanafadine\' OR \'PDC-1421\' OR \'Reboxetine\' OR \'Edivoxetine\' OR \'Bupropion\' OR \'Venlafaxine\' OR \'Duloxetine.\' They reviewed FDA fact sheets of available medications for safety/tolerability studies and reviewed published clinical studies of these medications for treatment of ADHD.
    UNASSIGNED: Adrenergic neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitors fit the diverse needs of children and adolescents with ADHD with 1) poor tolerability to stimulants (e.g. due to growth suppression, insomnia, rebound irritability, co-morbid depression, anxiety and tic disorders, substance abuse or diversion concerns), 2) cardiac risks, and/or 3) need for extended duration of action. Their differences in receptor affinities and modulating effects support the unique benefits of individual agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:具有广泛的治疗指数,功效,易用性,以及其他神经保护和呼吸益处,柠檬酸咖啡因(CC)目前是早产新生儿(PTN)的首选药物。咖啡因引起的过度能量消耗,利尿,利钠尿,和其他CC相关的潜在副作用(CC-APSE)导致早产儿的日体重增加(WG)降低。本研究旨在评估ICU中暴露于不同剂量咖啡因方案的新生儿每日WG的危险因素。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括胎龄≤36周且接受CC治疗的新生儿。对相同的参与者进行了两个出生后阶段的数据分析:15-28天和29-42天的生命(DOL)。根据每日CC剂量,形成的I组(接受;标准剂量=5mg/kg/天),II组(接受;>5-7mg/kg/天),和组-III(接受;>7mg/kg/天)。产前和产后临床特征,CC-方案,daily-WG,CC-APSE,以及伴随的风险因素,包括每日热量摄入,胃肠外营养持续时间,类固醇,利尿剂,和布洛芬接触,以I组为标准,分别对II组和III组进行分析。进行回归分析以评估每日WG的危险因素。
    结果:包括314个PTN。在15-28DOL期间,I组的平均每日WG(MD-WG)明显高于II组[19.9±0.70g/kg/dvs.17.7±0.52p=0.036]和III组[19.9±0.70g/kg/dvs.16.8±0.73p<0.001]。在29-42DOL期间,I组的MD-WG仅明显高于III组[21.7±0.44g/kg/dvs.18.3±0.41g/kg/dp=0.003],与II组相当。在15-28DOL期间,观察到的CC-APSE在II组和III组中显着更高,但在29-42DOL期间,仅在III组中显着。在15-28DOL期间每日WG的调整回归分析中,关于标准剂量,5-7mg/kg/天(β=-1.04;95CI:-1.62,-0.93)和>7-10mg/kg/天(β=-1.36;95CI:-1.56,-1.02)与较低的每日WG相关。然而,在29-42DOL期间,这种关联仅在>7-10mg/kg/d时存在(β=-1.54;95CI:-1.66,-1.42).仅在15-28DOL期间,GA≤27周(β=-1.0395CI:-1.24,-0.88)与较低的日WG相关。在这两个治疗期间,较高的累积咖啡因剂量和培养证实的败血症的存在,呼吸急促,低钠血症,喂养不耐受与每日WG降低显著相关。相反,发现两个时期的每日千卡摄入量与每日WG的增加有关。
    结论:在这项研究中,每日和累积剂量较高的咖啡因暴露与PTNs的产后每日WG低于标准每日剂量相关。这可能是由于其分解代谢效应和CC-APSE。
    BACKGROUND: With a wide therapeutic index, efficacy, ease of use, and other neuroprotective and respiratory benefits, caffeine citrate(CC) is currently the drug of choice for preterm neonates (PTNs). Caffeine-induced excessive energy expenditure, diuresis, natriuresis, and other CC-associated potential side-effects (CC-APSEs) result in lower daily-weight gain (WG) in premature neonates. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for daily-WG in neonates exposed to different dose regimens of caffeine in ICU.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included neonates of ≤ 36weeks gestational age (GA) and received CC-therapy. The same participants were followed for data analysis in two postnatal phases: 15-28 and 29-42 days of life (DOL). Based on daily CC-dose, formed group-I (received; standard-doses = 5 mg/kg/day), group-II (received;>5-7 mg/kg/day), and group-III (received;>7 mg/kg/day). Prenatal and postnatal clinical characteristics, CC-regimen, daily-WG, CC-APSEs, and concomitant risk-factors, including daily-caloric intake, Parenteral-Nutrition duration, steroids, diuretics, and ibuprofen exposure, were analyzed separately for group-II and group-III using group-I as standard. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors for daily-WG.
    RESULTS: Included 314 PTNs. During 15-28 DOL, the mean-daily-WG(MD-WG) was significantly higher in group-I than group-II [19.9 ± 0.70 g/kg/d vs. 17.7 ± 0.52 p = 0.036] and group-III [19.9 ± 0.70 g/kg/d vs. 16.8 ± 0.73 p < 0.001]. During 29-42 DOL the MD-WG of group-I was only significantly higher than group-III [21.7 ± 0.44 g/kg/d vs. 18.3 ± 0.41 g/kg/d p = 0.003] and comparable with group-II. During 15-28 DOL, observed CC-APSEs was significantly higher in group-II and III but during 29-42 DOL it was only significant in group-III. In the adjusted regression analysis for daily-WG during 15-28DOL, with respect to standard-dose, 5-7 mg/kg/day (β=-1.04; 95%CI:-1.62,-0.93) and > 7-10 mg/kg/day (β=-1.36; 95%CI:-1.56,-1.02) were associated with a lower daily-WG. However, during 29-42DOL, this association was present only for > 7-10 mg/kg/day (β=-1.54; 95%CI:-1.66,-1.42). The GA ≤ 27weeks (β=-1.03 95%CI:-1.24, -0.88) was associated with lower daily-WG only during 15-28DOL. During both periods of therapy, higher cumulative-caffeine dose and presence of culture proven sepsis, tachypnea, hyponatremia, and feeding intolerance were significantly associated with lower daily-WG. Conversely, daily kcal intake was found to be linked with an increase in daily-WG in both periods.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort exposure to higher caffeine daily and cumulative doses is associated with lower postnatal daily-WG in PTNs than standard-daily doses, which may be due to its catabolic effects and CC-APSEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在急性和慢性哌醋甲酯(MPD)给药之前和之后,总共记录了3102个神经元。急性MPD暴露主要引起剂量反应特征中神经元和行为活动的增加。对慢性MPD暴露的反应,与急性0.6、2.5或10.0mg/kgMPD相比,当根据动物行为反应进行神经元记录评估时,在某些动物中引起电生理和行为敏化,在其他动物中引起电生理和行为耐受,或运动量,慢性MPD暴露。与最初的MPD反应相比,从表达行为敏化的神经元中记录的大多数神经元对慢性MPD的反应进一步增加了放电率。与最初的MPD暴露相比,从表达行为耐受性的动物中记录的大多数神经元对慢性MPD有反应,其放电率降低。研究的六个大脑区域-腹侧被盖区,蓝斑,背侧中交,伏隔核,前额叶皮质,和尾状核(VTA,LC,DR,NAc,PFC,和CN)-对MPD的反应显著(p<0.001)不同,表明上述每个大脑区域在对MPD的反应中表现出不同的作用。此外,这项研究表明,有必要根据动物对来自多个脑区的药物的急性和慢性效应的行为反应来评估对精神兴奋剂的神经元活动反应,以获得每个区域对药物反应的作用的准确信息。
    A total of 3102 neurons were recorded before and following acute and chronic methylphenidate (MPD) administration. Acute MPD exposure elicits mainly increases in neuronal and behavioral activity in dose-response characteristics. The response to chronic MPD exposure, as compared to acute 0.6, 2.5, or 10.0 mg/kg MPD administration, elicits electrophysiological and behavioral sensitization in some animals and electrophysiological and behavioral tolerance in others when the neuronal recording evaluations were performed based on the animals\' behavioral responses, or amount of locomotor activity, to chronic MPD exposure. The majority of neurons recorded from those expressing behavioral sensitization responded to chronic MPD with further increases in firing rate as compared to the initial MPD responses. The majority of neurons recorded from animals expressing behavioral tolerance responded to chronic MPD with decreases in their firing rate as compared to the initial MPD exposures. Each of the six brain areas studied-the ventral tegmental area, locus coeruleus, dorsal raphe, nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex, and caudate nucleus (VTA, LC, DR, NAc, PFC, and CN)-responds significantly (p < 0.001) differently to MPD, suggesting that each one of the above brain areas exhibits different roles in the response to MPD. Moreover, this study demonstrates that it is essential to evaluate neuronal activity responses to psychostimulants based on the animals\' behavioral responses to acute and chronic effects of the drug from several brain areas simultaneously to obtain accurate information on each area\'s role in response to the drug.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性间非他明毒性的特征是兴奋剂作用和神经精神障碍,这是由γ-氨基丁酸A型受体激动剂,包括苯二氮卓。我们利用临床注册数据来检查在非法药物病例中共同暴露于γ-氨基丁酸B型受体激动剂(γ-羟基丁酸酯)的影响,并经分析证实暴露于metamfetamine。
    澳大利亚维多利亚州的新兴药物网络是一个伦理委员会批准的前瞻性注册表,收集急诊科非法药物介绍的临床和分析数据(利用血液样本)。比较组通过分析证实的暴露来定义:单独的氨非他明,间苯丙胺加γ-羟基丁酸酯,间非他明加苯二氮卓,间非他明+γ-羟基丁酸酯+苯二氮卓。排除同时接触其他兴奋剂或镇静剂的病例。
    间非他明血药浓度中位数在间非他明+γ-羟基丁酸酯中显著更大(n=153,中位数=0.20mg/L,四分位数间距:0.10-0.32mg/L,95%置信区间:0.20-0.23mg/L)和间非他明+γ-羟基丁酸酯+苯二氮卓(n=160,中位数=0.20mg/L,四分位数间距:0.10-0.30mg/L,95%置信区间:0.20-0.30mg/L)阳性组与γ-羟基丁酸酯阴性组(n=81,中位数=0.10mg/L,四分位数间距:0.05-0.21mg/L,95%的置信区间:0.09-0.18mg/L)和metamfetamine+苯二氮卓(n=73,中位数=0.10mg/L,四分位数间距:0.06-0.20mg/L,95%置信区间:0.09-0.20mg/L)组(P<0.0004)。在异氨非他明加γ-羟丁酸的情况下呈现心率(n=153,中位数=72次/分钟,四分位间距:每分钟63-86次,95%的置信区间:每分钟70-78次跳动)显着低于metamfetamine加苯二氮卓类药物的情况(n=73,中位数=每分钟84次跳动,四分位间距:每分钟73-98次,95%的置信区间:每分钟80-90次,P<0.0001),和单独的氨非他明病例(n=81,中位数=每分钟110次,四分位间距:每分钟87-131次,95%置信区间:每分钟93-120次,P<0.0001)。甲氨氟胺加γ-羟基丁酸酯病例的温度(中位数=35.8°C,四分位数间距:35.0-36.2°C,95%置信区间35.6-35.9°C)显着低于metamfetamine加苯二氮卓类药物(中位数36.2°C,四分位数间距35.7-36.6°C,95%置信区间,36.0-36.4°C,P=0.017),和单独的间非他明病例(中位数=36.5°C,四分位数间距:35.8-37.1°C,95%置信区间:36.2-36.7°C,P<0.0001)。苯二氮卓阳性组的收缩压中位数显着降低(P≤0.001)(metamfetamine+苯二氮卓中位数=120mmHg,四分位数间距:109-132mmHg,95%置信区间:116-124mmHg和metamfetamine+苯二氮卓+γ-羟基丁酸中位数=124mmHg,四分位数间距:110-137mmHg,95%置信区间:120-129mmHg)。安非他明加γ-羟基丁酸酯的镇静发生率(格拉斯哥昏迷评分小于9分)(63%)明显高于安非他明加苯二氮卓类药物的发生率(27%,P<0.0001)和单独的氨非他明病例(15%,P<0.0001)。间非他明+γ-羟基丁酸酯+苯二氮卓类药物的躁动发生率显著较低(17%,P<0.0001)和氨非他明加γ-羟基丁酸酯病例(34%,P=0.0004)与单独的间非他明病例(58%)相比。
    γ-氨基丁酸A型和B型受体生理学的差异可能提供γ-氨基丁酸B型激动剂促进的替代药效学机制,能够减弱metamfetamine兴奋剂和神经精神毒性。
    分析证实与γ-羟基丁酸共同接触的Metamfetamine中毒患者的心率显着降低,与单独使用间非他明的患者相比,体温和躁动的发生率。与单独暴露于苯二氮杂卓的患者相比,分析证实的苯二氮杂卓共同暴露于苯二氮杂卓的中毒患者的收缩压显着降低。我们假设γ-氨基丁酸B型受体激动剂可能对急性间非他明毒性的治疗有益。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute metamfetamine toxicity is characterized by stimulant effects and neuropsychiatric disturbance, which is attenuated by gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonists including benzodiazepines. We utilized clinical registry data to examine the effect of co-exposure to a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonist (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) in illicit drug cases with analytically confirmed exposure to metamfetamine.
    UNASSIGNED: The Emerging Drugs Network of Australia Victoria is an ethics board-approved prospective registry collecting clinical and analytical data (utilising blood samples) on emergency department illicit drug presentations. Comparison groups were defined by analytically confirmed exposure: lone metamfetamine, metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate, metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine, metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate plus benzodiazepine. Cases with co-exposure to other stimulants or sedatives were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: Median metamfetamine blood concentrations were significantly greater in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate (n = 153, median = 0.20 mg/L, interquartile range: 0.10-0.32 mg/L, 95 per cent confidence interval: 0.20-0.23 mg/L) and metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate plus benzodiazepine (n = 160, median = 0.20 mg/L, interquartile range: 0.10-0.30 mg/L, 95 per cent confidence interval: 0.20-0.30 mg/L) positive groups compared to gamma-hydroxybutyrate negative groups including metamfetamine (n = 81, median = 0.10 mg/L, interquartile range: 0.05-0.21 mg/L, 95 per cent confidence interval: 0.09-0.18 mg/L) and metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine (n = 73, median = 0.10 mg/L, interquartile range: 0.06-0.20 mg/L, 95 per cent confidence interval: 0.09-0.20 mg/L) groups (P < 0.0004). Presenting heart rate in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate cases (n = 153, median = 72 beats per minute, interquartile range: 63-86 beats per minute, 95 per cent confidence interval: 70-78 beats per minute) was significantly lower than metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine cases (n = 73, median = 84 beats per minute, interquartile range: 73-98 beats per minute, 95 per cent confidence interval: 80-90 beats per minute, P < 0.0001), and lone metamfetamine cases (n = 81, median = 110 beats per minute, interquartile range: 87-131 beats per minute, 95 per cent confidence interval: 93-120 beats per minute, P < 0.0001). Presenting temperature in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate cases (median = 35.8 °C, interquartile range: 35.0-36.2 °C, 95 per cent confidence interval 35.6-35.9 °C) was significantly lower than metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine cases (median 36.2 °C, interquartile range 35.7-36.6 °C, 95 per cent confidence interval, 36.0-36.4 °C, P = 0.017), and lone metamfetamine cases (median = 36.5 °C, interquartile range: 35.8-37.1 °C, 95 per cent confidence interval: 36.2-36.7 °C, P < 0.0001). Median presenting systolic blood pressure was significantly (P ≤ 0.001) lower in benzodiazepine positive groups (metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine median = 120 mmHg, interquartile range: 109-132 mmHg, 95 per cent confidence interval: 116-124 mmHg and metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate median = 124 mmHg, interquartile range: 110-137 mmHg, 95 per cent confidence interval: 120-129 mmHg). Incidence of sedation (Glasgow Coma Scale less than 9) was significantly greater in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate cases (63 per cent) compared to metamfetamine plus benzodiazepine cases (27 per cent, P < 0.0001) and lone metamfetamine cases (15 per cent, P < 0.0001). Incidence of agitation was significantly lower in metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate plus benzodiazepine cases (17 per cent, P < 0.0001) and metamfetamine plus gamma-hydroxybutyrate cases (34 per cent, P = 0.0004) compared to lone metamfetamine cases (58 per cent).
    UNASSIGNED: Differences in gamma-aminobutyric acid type A and B receptor physiology may offer a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B agonist-facilitated alternative pharmacodynamic mechanism able to attenuate metamfetamine stimulant and neuropsychiatric toxicity.
    UNASSIGNED: Metamfetamine intoxicated patients with analytically confirmed co-exposure to gamma-hydroxybutyrate had significantly reduced heart rate, body temperature and incidence of agitation compared to patients with lone metamfetamine exposure. Metamfetamine intoxicated patients with analytically confirmed co-exposure to a benzodiazepine had significantly reduced systolic blood pressure compared to patients with lone metamfetamine exposure. We hypothesize that gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonists may be beneficial in the management of acute metamfetamine toxicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    这项系统评价和荟萃分析评估了这些特征,类型,和影响的干预措施,以提高坚持注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)药物治疗的三个阶段的背景下,即,initiation,实施,和中止。
    PubMed,心理信息数据库,Embase,国际医药文摘,和谷歌学者使用适当的搜索词系统地搜索相关试验。干预被归类为教育,行为,情感,和多方面的。使用比值比和比例汇总数据。
    本综述包括17项研究。在对四个随机对照试验的汇总分析中,干预措施并未显著改善用药依从性(OR=2.32;95%-置信区间=CI=0.91~5.90;p=0.08).在七项非随机试验中,在干预组中,坚持使用ADHD药物的人的总比例要高得多(85%,95CI=78%-91%)比对照组(47%,95CI=33%-61%)。干预措施在研究设计方面各不相同,方法及其对依从性不同阶段的影响。
    尽管取得了一些有希望的结果,缺乏对特定阶段依从性因素的考虑可能会限制提高临床实践依从性的干预措施的有效性和可持续性.未来的干预措施应该是特定阶段的,以与每个阶段相关的因素为导向。同时,临床医生应根据个人需求和偏好选择或定制干预措施.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the characteristics, types, and impact of interventions to improve adherence to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications within the context of the three phases of adherence, namely, initiation, implementation, and discontinuation.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Psychological Information Database, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for relevant trials using appropriate search terms. Interventions were classified as educational, behavioural, affective, and multifaceted. Data was pooled using odds ratios and proportions.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventeen studies were included in this review. In a pooled analysis of four RCTs, interventions did not significantly improve medication adherence (OR = 2.32; 95%-Confidence Interval=CI = 0.91-5.90; p = 0.08). In seven non-randomized trials, a pooled proportion of people who adhered to ADHD medication was considerably higher in the intervention group (85%, 95%CI = 78%-91%) than in the control group (47%, 95%CI = 33%-61%). Interventions varied in terms of study design, methods and their impact on different phases of adherence.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite some promising results, the lack of consideration of phase-specific adherence factors may limit the effectiveness and sustainability of interventions to improve adherence in clinical practice. Future interventions should be phase-specific, guided by factors which are pertinent to each phase. Meanwhile, clinicians should choose or tailor interventions based on individual needs and preferences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号