Cariostatic Agents

Cariostatic Agents
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:氟化物是降低全球龋齿患病率的主要因素。然而,对于不同年龄段的人是否了解含氟牙膏的好处,知识不足,以及人们的日常口腔护理习惯和是否使用氟化物。这项研究的目的是调查伊朗学生关于使用含氟牙膏的知识和表现。
    方法:本研究以克尔曼市高中一年级和二年级学生为研究对象。包含个人问题的问卷,一般问题,并向他们提供了与学生有关使用氟化物牙膏的知识和表现有关的问题,然后要求他们完成并提交。通过T检验对调查结果进行分析,曼-惠特尼测试,以及SPSS第24版中的卡方检验。数据分析的显著性水平为P<0.05。
    结果:在这项研究中,检查了681份表格,包括252名男孩和429名女孩。参与者的平均年龄为14.1±0.4。91.2%的人表示他们使用牙膏,其中77.8%的人使用含氟牙膏。521人表示,牙膏的价格对于使用牙膏的类型很重要。621人使用普通牙刷,609人评估他们的口腔健康良好。621名参与者表示,牙膏使口腔健康。24个中的平均知识得分为16.7±2.1,这表明该领域学生的平均知识。
    结论:这项研究表明,学生对使用含氟牙膏的知识和表现是平均的。绩效和知识与年龄和性别之间没有显着关系。知识与绩效之间也存在正相关,表明知识的增加导致行为变化的增加。此外,知识与绩效之间存在正相关,知识与绩效之间的相关系数为0.731。它表明,知识的增加导致行为变化的增加。
    BACKGROUND: Fluoride is the main factor in reducing the prevalence of caries worldwide. However, there is insufficient knowledge about whether people in different age groups are aware of the benefits of fluoride toothpaste, as well as about people\'s daily oral care habits and whether they use fluoride. The purpose of this research is to investigate the knowledge and performance of Iranian students regarding the use of toothpaste containing fluoride.
    METHODS: This study was conducted on the first- and second-year high school students of Kerman city. Questionnaires containing personal questions, general questions, and questions related to students\' knowledge and performance regarding the use of fluoride toothpaste were provided to them and then they were asked to complete and submit it. The results obtained from the survey were analyzed by T-test, Mann-Whitney test, and Chi-Square test in SPSS Version 24. The significance level in data analysis was P < 0.05.
    RESULTS: In this research, 681 forms including 252 boys and 429 girls were examined. The average age of the participants was 14.1 ± 0.4. 91.2% declared that they use toothpaste and 77.8% of them used toothpaste containing fluoride. 521 people stated that the price of toothpaste is important in using the type of toothpaste. 621 people used regular toothbrush and 609 people evaluated their oral health as good. 621 of the participants stated that toothpaste makes the mouth healthy. The average knowledge score was 16.7 ± 2.1 out of 24, which indicates the average knowledge of students in this field.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that students\' knowledge and performance about using fluoride-containing toothpaste is average. There was no significant relationship between performance and knowledge with age and gender. There was also a positive correlation between knowledge and performance indicating that increasing knowledge leads to an increase in behavioral changes. Also, there was a positive correlation between knowledge and performance, and a correlation coefficient of 0.731 was obtained between knowledge and performance. It shows that increasing knowledge leads to increasing behavioral changes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:龋齿是一个动态过程。通过使用治疗剂,早期,非空化病变和龋齿仅限于釉质可以停止甚至再矿化。对于初始龋齿病变的再矿化,研究了许多非氟化再矿化剂。
    目的:一项观察性研究,以评估磷酸三钙(TCP)的再矿化功效,纳米羟基磷灰石(nHAp)和臭氧再矿化剂对人工龋齿的影响。
    方法:在这项观察性研究中,人工龋齿是在40颗前磨牙上产生的。稍后,再矿化剂(A组:nHAp,B组:TCP,C组:臭氧再矿化剂,D组:对照组(去离子水)用于再矿化脱矿质牙齿。利用维氏硬度数,评估了脱矿质和再矿化水平.随后,使用Tukey的HSD(诚实的显着差异)和SPSS版本21.0中的ANOVA测试对这些读数进行了统计评估。P值设定为0.05以下。
    结果:脱矿质后,牙釉质显微硬度值下降,A组32%,B组26%,C组22%,D组21%,分别。从基线到脱矿质,所有组的显微硬度均有统计学显著下降.再矿化后,A组,B,C的显微硬度增加,而D组没有变化。这表明A组的再矿化率最高,其次是B组和C组。
    结论:nHAp和TCP具有更大的再矿化能力,可用于处理最初的龋齿病变。
    BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a dynamic process. By using therapeutic agents, early, noncavitated lesions and caries limited to the enamel can be stopped or even remineralized. For the remineralization of the initial carious lesion, many nonfluoridated remineralizing agents were investigated.
    OBJECTIVE: An observational study to assess the remineralizing efficacy of tricalcium phosphate (TCP), nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAp) and ozone remineralizing agents on the artificial carious lesion.
    METHODS: In this observational research, the artificial carious lesion was produced on extracted 40 premolar teeth. Later, remineralizing agents (Group A: nHAp, Group B: TCP, Group C: Ozone remineralizing agents, Group D: Control group (Deionized water) were used to remineralize demineralized teeth. Utilizing the Vickers Hardness Number, the level of demineralization and remineralization was assessed. Later these readings were statistically assessed using the Tukey\'s HSD (honestly significant difference) and ANOVA tests in SPSS version 21.0. The P value was set at 0.05 or less.
    RESULTS: After demineralization, there was a decrease in enamel microhardness values, with 32% in Group A, 26% in Group B, 22% in Group C, and 21% in Group D, respectively. From the baseline to demineralization, there was a statistically significant decrease in microhardness across all groups. After remineralization, Groups A, B, and C experienced an increase in microhardness while Group D experienced no changes. This showed that Group A had the highest remineralization percentage, followed by Group B and Group C.
    CONCLUSIONS: nHAp and TCP had the greater remineralizing ability, which can be used to manage initial carious lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估含TiF4/NaF的实验溶液对辐射诱导的牙本质龋齿病变发展的保护作用。
    方法:对牛根样品进行辐照(70Gy)并按以下方式分布(n=12/组):商业唾液(BioXtra),NaF(500ppmF-),TiF4(500ppmF),TiF4/NaF(TiF4:300ppmF-,NaF:190ppmF-),和磷酸盐缓冲溶液(PBS,阴性对照)。生物膜是使用受照射患者的生物膜和McBain唾液(0.2%的蔗糖,在37oC和5%CO2下)持续五天。处理施用1x/天。计数菌落形成单位(CFU),并通过横向显微照相定量脱矿质。对所有参数应用ANOVA/Tukey检验。
    结果:所有处理均降低了总微生物的CFU。TiF4减少乳杆菌属。(7.04±0.26log10CFU/mL)和变形链球菌(7.18±0.28)CFU最,与PBS(7.58±0.21和7.75±0.17)相比,然后是NaF(7.12±0.31和7.34±0.22)和TiF4/NaF(7.16±0.35和7.29±0.29)。TiF4和商业唾液显示出最低的整合矿物质损失(ΔZ-vol%。mm)(分别为1977±150和2062±243),与PBS(4540±335)相比,其次是NaF(2403±235)和TiF4/NaF(2340±200)。与PBS(153±24)相比,商业唾液是唯一显着降低矿物质损失(LD-μm)(111±25)的方法。当与PBS(28.1±2.9)相比时,TiF4(18.2±3.3)的平均矿物质损失(R体积%)降低了35.2%。结论:在本研究的模型下,TiF4/NaF具有与TiF4和商业唾液相当的抗致龋作用。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the protective effect of an experimental solution containing TiF4/NaF on the development of radiation-induced dentin caries lesions.
    METHODS: bovine root samples were irradiated (70Gy) and distributed as following (n=12/group): Commercial Saliva (BioXtra), NaF (500 ppm F-), TiF4 (500 ppm F), TiF4/NaF (TiF4: 300 ppm F-, NaF: 190 ppm F-), and Phosphate buffer solution (PBS, negative control). Biofilm was produced using biofilm from irradiated patients and McBain saliva (0.2% of sucrose, at 37oC and 5% CO2) for five days. The treatments were applied 1x/day. Colony-forming units (CFU) were counted and demineralization was quantified by transversal microradiography. The ANOVA/Tukey test was applied for all parameters.
    RESULTS: All treatments reduced CFU for total microorganisms. TiF4 reduced Lactobacillus sp. (7.04±0.26 log10 CFU/mL) and mutans streptococci (7.18±0.28) CFU the most, when compared to PBS (7.58±0.21 and 7.75±0.17) and followed by NaF (7.12±0.31 and 7.34±0.22) and TiF4/NaF (7.16±0.35 and 7.29± 0.29). TiF4 and Commercial saliva showed the lowest integrated mineral loss (ΔZ-vol%.mm) (1977±150 and 2062±243, respectively) when compared to PBS (4540±335), followed by NaF (2403±235) and TiF4/NaF (2340±200). Commercial saliva was the only to significantly reduce mineral loss (LD-µm) (111±25) compared to PBS (153±24).Mean mineral loss (R-vol%) decreased by 35.2% for TiF4 (18.2±3.3) when compared to PBS (28.1±2.9) Conclusion: TiF4/NaF has a comparable anti-cariogenic effect to TiF4 and Commercial saliva under the model in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估Er的影响,Cr:YSGG辐照和980nm二极管激光器对经受龋齿挑战的牙本质的表面粗糙度(SR)和体积损失(VL)。随后,130例牛牙本质标本分为以下13组:NT:未处理;FG:氟化物凝胶;FV:氟化物清漆;Di:980nm二极管;DiFG;DiFV;FGD;FVDi;Er:Er,Cr:YSGG;Er+FG;Er+FV;FG+Er和FV+Er。呃,Cr:YSGG激光参数如下:0.25W;5.0Hz;4.46J/cm2,没有水和55%空气。此外,980nm二极管激光器参数为2.0W;2.0Hz;21.41J/cm2。对来自每组的样品进行pH循环。使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜来评估SR和VL。参考区域和处理区域的体积之间的差异+DES/RE用于确定SR和VL。对不同组的平均值进行方差分析和Tukey的事后检验。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Dunn事后检验分析VL值(p<0.05)。参考区域的SR未显示统计学上显著的1807-3107-bor-38-e025处理和致龋攻击(p>0.05)。此外,FVDi和FVEr组中的VL与接受不同类型的治疗和致龋攻击的区域相比显示出统计学上的显着差异(p>0.05)。呃,Cr:与氟化物清漆相关的YSGG和980nm二极管激光器降低了遭受致龋挑战的牛齿中的牙本质VL。
    This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation and 980-nm diode lasers on the surface roughness (SR) and volume loss (VL) of dentin subjected to cariogenic challenge. Subsequently, 130 specimens of bovine dentin were divided into the following 13 groups: NT: no treatment; FG: fluoride gel; FV: fluoride varnish; Di: 980-nm diode; Di + FG; Di + FV; FG + D; FV + Di; Er: Er,Cr:YSGG; Er + FG; Er + FV; FG + Er and FV + Er. Er,Cr:YSGG laser parameters were as follows: 0.25 W; 5.0 Hz; 4.46 J/cm2 without water and 55% air. Furthermore, the 980-nm diode laser parameters were 2.0 W; 2.0 Hz; 21.41 J/cm2. The samples from each group were subjected to pH cycling. A confocal laser scanning microscope was used to evaluate SR and VL. Difference between the volume of the reference and treated areas + DES/RE was used to determine SR and VL. The mean values of the different groups were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey\'s post-hoc test. The VL values were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post-hoc test (p < 0.05). The SR of the reference area did not show a statistically significant 1807-3107-bor-38-e025treatment and cariogenic challenge (p > 0.05). Moreover, VL in the FV + Di and FV + Er groups showed a statistically significant difference compared with areas submitted to different types of treatment and cariogenic challenge (p > 0.05). Er,Cr:YSGG and 980-nm diode lasers associated with fluoride varnishes decreased dentin VL in bovine teeth submitted to cariogenic challenge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是2010年首次发布的评论的更新。随着时间的推移,使用局部氟化物变得越来越普遍。幼儿局部氟化物消耗过多的氟化物可能会导致恒牙氟中毒。
    描述幼儿局部使用氟化物与恒牙氟斑牙风险之间的关系。
    我们对Cochrane口腔健康试验登记册进行了电子搜索,中部,MEDLINE,Embase,另外三个数据库,和两个试验记录。我们搜索了相关文章的参考列表。最近的搜索日期是2022年7月28日。
    我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),准RCT,队列研究,病例对照研究,和比较含氟牙膏的横断面调查,漱口水,凝胶,泡沫,油漆解决方案,和不同氟化物疗法的清漆,安慰剂,或者不干预。在引入局部氟化物后,目标人群是六岁以下的儿童。
    我们使用了Cochrane期望的标准方法学程序,并使用GRADE来评估证据的确定性。主要结果指标是恒牙中氟中毒的患病率百分比。两位作者从所有纳入的研究中提取了数据。在报告了调整后和未调整后的风险比或赔率比的情况下,我们在荟萃分析中使用了调整值.
    我们纳入了43项研究:三项随机对照试验,四项队列研究,10个病例对照研究,和26项横断面调查。我们判断了所有三个RCT,一项队列研究,一项病例对照研究,和六项横断面研究对偏见风险有一些担忧。我们认为所有其他观察性研究都存在高偏倚风险。我们将这些研究分为五个比较。比较1.儿童开始使用含氟牙膏刷牙的年龄两项队列研究(260名儿童)提供了非常不确定的证据,表明儿童在12个月或之前开始使用含氟牙膏刷牙与12个月后发生氟中毒之间的关联(风险比(RR)0.98,95%置信区间(CI)0.81至1.18;非常低的确定性证据)。同样,来自一项队列研究(3939名儿童)和两项横断面研究(1484名儿童)的证据提供了非常不确定的证据,表明儿童在24个月之前或之后开始使用氟化物牙膏刷牙(RR0.83,95%CI0.61至1.13;非常低的确定性证据)或四年之前或之后(比值比(OR)1.60,95%CI0.77至3.35;非常低的确定性证据),分别。比较2.使用氟化物牙膏刷牙的频率两项病例对照研究(258名儿童)提供了非常不确定的证据,表明儿童每天刷牙少于两次与每天刷牙两次或两次以上与氟中毒发展之间的关联(OR1.63,95%CI0.81至3.28;非常低的确定性证据)。两项横断面调查(1693名儿童)表明,每天刷牙少于一次与每天一次或多次刷牙可能与儿童氟中毒的发展减少有关(OR0.62,95%CI0.53至0.74;低确定性证据)。比较3.用于刷牙的氟化物牙膏的量两项病例对照研究(258名儿童)提供了非常不确定的证据,证明使用不到半刷牙膏的儿童之间的关联。相对于一半或更多的刷子,和氟中毒的发展(OR0.77,95%CI0.41至1.46;非常低的确定性证据)。来自横断面调查的证据也非常不确定(OR0.92,95%CI0.66至1.28;3项研究,2037名儿童;非常低的确定性证据)。比较4.牙膏中的氟化物浓度两项随机对照试验(1968年儿童)的证据表明,六岁以下儿童使用的牙膏中氟化物浓度较低可能会降低患氟中毒的风险:百万分之550(ppm)氟化物与1000ppm(RR0.75,95%CI0.57至0.99;中度确定性证据);440ppm氟化物与1450ppm(RR0.72,95%CI0.58至0.89;中度确定性证据)。开始刷牙的年龄为24个月零12个月,分别。两项病例对照研究(258名儿童)提供了关于1000ppm以下氟化物浓度之间关联的非常不确定的证据。相对于1000ppm或以上的浓度,和氟中毒的发展(OR0.89,95%CI0.52至1.52;非常低的确定性证据)。比较5.使用局部氟化物清漆的年龄来自一项RCT(123名儿童)的证据表明,在四年前使用氟化物清漆之间可能几乎没有差异,与没有应用程序相比,和氟中毒的发展(RR0.77,95%CI0.45至1.31;低确定性证据)。来自两项横断面调查(982名儿童)的低确定性证据表明,在4岁之前局部使用氟化物清漆可能与儿童氟中毒的发展有关(OR2.18,95%CI1.46至3.25)。
    大多数证据认为轻度氟中毒是早期使用局部氟化物的潜在不良后果。关于恒牙氟中毒的风险,有低至非常低的确定性和不确定的证据:当儿童开始接受局部氟化物清漆应用时;用氟化物牙膏刷牙;儿童使用的牙膏量;和刷牙的频率。RCT的中度确定性证据表明,从1至2岁到5至6岁,用1000ppm或更多氟化物牙膏刷牙的儿童可能会增加恒牙氟斑牙的机会。提出新的RCT来评估氟斑牙的发展是不道德的。然而,未来以龋齿预防为重点的随机对照试验可以记录儿童在生命早期暴露于局部氟化物源的情况,并将其恒牙中的氟斑牙作为长期结果进行评估.在缺乏这些研究和方法的情况下,这方面的进一步研究将来自观测研究。需要注意研究设计的选择,考虑到前瞻性对照研究比回顾性和非对照研究更不容易出现偏倚.
    This is an update of a review first published in 2010. Use of topical fluoride has become more common over time. Excessive fluoride consumption from topical fluorides in young children could potentially lead to dental fluorosis in permanent teeth.
    To describe the relationship between the use of topical fluorides in young children and the risk of developing dental fluorosis in permanent teeth.
    We carried out electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two trials registers. We searched the reference lists of relevant articles. The latest search date was 28 July 2022.
    We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional surveys comparing fluoride toothpaste, mouth rinses, gels, foams, paint-on solutions, and varnishes to a different fluoride therapy, placebo, or no intervention. Upon the introduction of topical fluorides, the target population was children under six years of age.
    We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. The primary outcome measure was the percentage prevalence of fluorosis in the permanent teeth. Two authors extracted data from all included studies. In cases where both adjusted and unadjusted risk ratios or odds ratios were reported, we used the adjusted value in the meta-analysis.
    We included 43 studies: three RCTs, four cohort studies, 10 case-control studies, and 26 cross-sectional surveys. We judged all three RCTs, one cohort study, one case-control study, and six cross-sectional studies to have some concerns for risk of bias. We judged all other observational studies to be at high risk of bias. We grouped the studies into five comparisons. Comparison 1. Age at which children started toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste Two cohort studies (260 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between children starting to use fluoride toothpaste for brushing at or before 12 months versus after 12 months and the development of fluorosis (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.18; very low-certainty evidence). Similarly, evidence from one cohort study (3939 children) and two cross-sectional studies (1484 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between children starting to use fluoride toothpaste for brushing before or after the age of 24 months (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.13; very low-certainty evidence) or before or after four years (odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.35; very low-certainty evidence), respectively. Comparison 2. Frequency of toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste Two case-control studies (258 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between children brushing less than twice per day versus twice or more per day and the development of fluorosis (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.28; very low-certainty evidence). Two cross-sectional surveys (1693 children) demonstrated that brushing less than once per day versus once or more per day may be associated with a decrease in the development of fluorosis in children (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.74; low-certainty evidence). Comparison 3. Amount of fluoride toothpaste used for toothbrushing Two case-control studies (258 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between children using less than half a brush of toothpaste, versus half or more of the brush, and the development of fluorosis (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.46; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence from cross-sectional surveys was also very uncertain (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.28; 3 studies, 2037 children; very low-certainty evidence). Comparison 4. Fluoride concentration in toothpaste There was evidence from two RCTs (1968 children) that lower fluoride concentration in the toothpaste used by children under six years of age likely reduces the risk of developing fluorosis: 550 parts per million (ppm) fluoride versus 1000 ppm (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99; moderate-certainty evidence); 440 ppm fluoride versus 1450 ppm (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.89; moderate-certainty evidence). The age at which the toothbrushing commenced was 24 months and 12 months, respectively. Two case-control studies (258 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between fluoride concentrations under 1000 ppm, versus concentrations of 1000 ppm or above, and the development of fluorosis (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.52; very low-certainty evidence). Comparison 5. Age at which topical fluoride varnish was applied There was evidence from one RCT (123 children) that there may be little to no difference between a fluoride varnish application before four years, versus no application, and the development of fluorosis (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.31; low-certainty evidence). There was low-certainty evidence from two cross-sectional surveys (982 children) that the application of topical fluoride varnish before four years of age may be associated with the development of fluorosis in children (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.25).
    Most evidence identified mild fluorosis as a potential adverse outcome of using topical fluoride at an early age. There is low- to very low-certainty and inconclusive evidence on the risk of having fluorosis in permanent teeth for: when a child starts receiving topical fluoride varnish application; toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste; the amount of toothpaste used by the child; and the frequency of toothbrushing. Moderate-certainty evidence from RCTs showed that children who brushed with 1000 ppm or more fluoride toothpaste from one to two years of age until five to six years of age probably had an increased chance of developing dental fluorosis in permanent teeth. It is unethical to propose new RCTs to assess the development of dental fluorosis. However, future RCTs focusing on dental caries prevention could record children\'s exposure to topical fluoride sources in early life and evaluate the dental fluorosis in their permanent teeth as a long-term outcome. In the absence of these studies and methods, further research in this area will come from observational studies. Attention needs to be given to the choice of study design, bearing in mind that prospective controlled studies will be less susceptible to bias than retrospective and uncontrolled studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:影响全世界儿童的最普遍的健康问题之一是乳牙中未经治疗的龋齿。阻止龋齿的代理商用于管理弱势社区儿童未经治疗的腐烂。纳米氟化银(NSF)克服了氟化银二胺(SDF)的染色问题。这项研究比较了NSF与38%SDF的临床防龋效果,以阻止龋齿病变。
    方法:这项研究包括360名4岁以下的儿童,至少有一个活动性病变,ICDAS评分≥3,从亚历山大农村地区的托儿所招募,埃及,2022年。他们被随机分配在基线时接受一次NSF申请,或在基线和6个月后两次应用SDF。在6个月和12个月后使用ICDAS标准评估活动性龋齿病变的停止。和父母对儿童外观的满意度也进行了评估。采用卡方检验比较各组,采用多水平多元logistic回归评估干预对病变水平龋齿阻滞的影响,采用二元logistic回归评估患者水平的影响。
    结果:1853个活动性病变包括在平均(SD)年龄为42.3(8.2)个月的儿童中。NSF在病变水平上的停滞率明显高于SDF组(6个月时为78.4%和65.0%,12个月时为71.3%和56.3%,p<0.001)。在回归分析中,NSF在病变水平有明显高于SDF的龋齿停滞几率(6个月时,AOR=2.57,95%CI:1.55,4.26和12个月时,AOR=3.27,95%CI:1.89,5.67)。接受NSF的孩子的父母对孩子的牙齿外观的满意度明显高于接受SDF的孩子:(97.2%和76.1%,分别,p<0.001)。
    结论:与SDF相比,NSF在阻止学龄前儿童龋齿方面表现出更高的有效性,而不会引起牙齿黑色染色,并且父母的满意度更高。NSF可以替代SDF,特别是在贫困社区中,可以逮捕龋齿。
    背景:该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov注册表(#NCT05255913)-2022年2月16日注册。
    BACKGROUND: One of the most prevalent health problems affecting children worldwide is untreated caries in primary teeth. Agents to arrest caries are used to manage untreated decay in children in disadvantaged communities. Nano Silver Fluoride (NSF) overcomes the staining problems of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF). This study compared the clinical cariostatic effect of NSF to 38% SDF for arresting caries lesions.
    METHODS: The study included 360 children younger than 4 years, with at least one active lesion, ICDAS score ≥ 3, recruited from nurseries in a rural area in Alexandria, Egypt, in 2022. They were randomly assigned to receive a single application of NSF at baseline, or two applications of SDF at baseline and after 6 months. The arrest of active carious lesions was assessed after 6 and 12 months using ICDAS criteria, and parents\' satisfaction with child appearance was also assessed. Chi-Square test was used to compare the groups and multi-level multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of the intervention on caries arrest at lesion level and binary logistic regression was used to assess the effect at patient level.
    RESULTS: 1853 active lesions were included in children whose mean (SD) age was 42.3 (8.2) months. The arrest rate was significantly higher in the NSF than the SDF group at lesion level (78.4% and 65.0% at 6 months and 71.3% and 56.3% at 12 months, p < 0.001). In regression analysis, NSF had significantly higher odds of caries arrest than SDF at lesion level (at 6 months, AOR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.55, 4.26 and at 12 month, AOR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.89, 5.67). Parents of children receiving NSF had significantly greater satisfaction with their children\'s dental appearance than those receiving SDF: (97.2% and 76.1%, respectively, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: NSF demonstrated greater effectiveness in arresting caries in preschool children without inducing black staining of teeth and with greater parental satisfaction than SDF. NSF can be an alternative to SDF in arresting caries especially in underprivileged communities.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered in the clinicaltrials.gov registry (#NCT05255913)-16/02/2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    氟化银二胺(SDF)和无创伤修复治疗(ART)是微创的治疗方式,用于预防和控制龋齿。这两种技术的融合导致了银修饰的无创伤修复治疗(SMART)的发展。在这种方法中,在施加SDF后,用玻璃离聚物水泥(GIC)修复了龋齿。SMART有效地阻止龋齿而不去除额外的牙齿结构,使其成为缺乏合作能力的儿童龋齿管理的一个有希望的选择。本文回顾了关于SMART的文献,关于其在牙科实践中应用的证据,其优势,缺点,研究范围,和临床使用。
    Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) are treatment modalities that are minimally invasive and used for the prevention and control of dental caries. The amalgamation of these two techniques has led to the development of silver modified atraumatic restorative treatment (SMART). In this approach the carious lesion is restored with glass-ionomer cement (GIC) after SDF application. SMART effectively arrests caries without removing additional tooth structure, making it a promising option for caries management in children who lack cooperative ability.This article reviews the literature on SMART, the evidence regarding its applications in dental practice, its advantages, drawbacks, the scope for research, and clinical use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:用于阻止龋齿的含银溶液的黑色染色效果会对儿童和父母产生负面的美学影响。本研究旨在评估氟化银二胺/碘化钾(SDF/KI)的染色效果,SDF和纳米氟化银(NSF)。
    方法:收集44颗提取的龋齿原磨牙,随机分为4组(n=11)。用挖掘机使用化学机械龋齿去除剂去除所有牙齿中的龋齿组织。在所有组去除龋齿后,SDF,SDF/KI,NSF被应用于不同的群体,而对照组没有应用溶液。随后,所有组的牙齿均用复合体修复。颜色值L*,使用分光光度计在三个时间点测量a*和b*:在复合体恢复后立即(T0),一周后(T1),四周后(T2)。计算亮度(ΔL)和颜色(ΔE)随时间的变化,并进行组间比较。
    结果:随着时间的推移,与其他组相比,SDF溶液在复合体材料上引起统计学上显著的黑色染色(p=0.013)和L*值降低(p<0.001)。
    结论:观察到SDF/KI具有降低SDF黑色染色效果的潜力,虽然不完全。像NSF这样的新型实验解决方案可以提供一种替代方案来抵消SDF的染色效果。
    BACKGROUND: The black staining effect of silver-containing solutions for use to arrest caries can have a negative aesthetic impact on children and parents. This study aims to assess the staining effects of Silver Diamine Fluoride/Potassium Iodide (SDF/KI), SDF and Nanosilver Fluoride (NSF).
    METHODS: Forty-four extracted carious primary molars were collected and randomly divided into four groups (n = 11). The carious tissue in all teeth was removed using a chemo-mechanical caries removal agent with an excavator. After caries removal in all groups, SDF, SDF/KI, and NSF were applied to the different groups, while no solution was applied to the control group. Subsequently, the teeth in all groups were restored with compomer. Color values L*, a* and b* were measured using a spectrophotometer at three time points: immediately after compomer restoration (T0), one week later (T1), and four week later (T2). Changes in brightness (ΔL) and color (ΔE) over time were calculated and comparisons among groups were made.
    RESULTS: The SDF solution induced statistically significant black staining (p = 0.013) and a decrease in L* value (p < 0.001) on the compomer material compared to the other groups over time.
    CONCLUSIONS: It was observed that SDF/KI has the potential to reduce the black staining effect of SDF, though not entirely. Novel experimental solutions like NSF may offer an alternative to counteract the staining effect of SDF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号