Care navigation

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本文概述了由AllofUs研究计划的遗传咨询资源开发的可扩展系统,以审查大型医疗保健资源数据库,以支持参与者与健康相关的DNA结果。
    方法:在对已建立的卫生资源评估框架进行文献综述之后,我们创造了声纳,面向健康相关参与者的资源的10个项目框架和分级量表。SONAR用于审查可以在遗传咨询期间与参与者共享的临床资源。
    结果:应用SONAR将资源审批时间从7天缩短至1天。通过SONAR审查,批准了约256个资源,拒绝了8个资源。大多数批准的资源与全国参与者相关(60.0%)。最常见的资源类型与支持组相关(20%),癌症护理(30.6%),和一般教育资源(12.4%)。在3005(38.6%)咨询期间,所有美国遗传咨询师都提供了1161个批准的资源,主要是本地遗传咨询师(29.9%),支持团体(21.9%),和教育资源(21.0%)。
    结论:SONAR的系统方法简化了医疗保健提供者的资源审查,减轻识别和评估可信资源的负担。将这些资源编译到用户友好的数据库中,允许提供商有效地共享这些资源,更好地让参与者从健康相关的DNA结果中完成后续行动。
    结论:我们所有人的遗传咨询资源将接受与健康相关的DNA结果的参与者与大量相关的后续资源联系起来,国家一级。通过创建新的资源数据库和验证系统,这已经成为可能。
    OBJECTIVE: This article outlines a scalable system developed by the All of Us Research Program\'s Genetic Counseling Resource to vet a large database of healthcare resources for supporting participants with health-related DNA results.
    METHODS: After a literature review of established evaluation frameworks for health resources, we created SONAR, a 10-item framework and grading scale for health-related participant-facing resources. SONAR was used to review clinical resources that could be shared with participants during genetic counseling.
    RESULTS: Application of SONAR shortened resource approval time from 7 days to 1 day. About 256 resources were approved and 8 rejected through SONAR review. Most approved resources were relevant to participants nationwide (60.0%). The most common resource types were related to support groups (20%), cancer care (30.6%), and general educational resources (12.4%). All of Us genetic counselors provided 1161 approved resources during 3005 (38.6%) consults, mainly to local genetic counselors (29.9%), support groups (21.9%), and educational resources (21.0%).
    CONCLUSIONS: SONAR\'s systematic method simplifies resource vetting for healthcare providers, easing the burden of identifying and evaluating credible resources. Compiling these resources into a user-friendly database allows providers to share these resources efficiently, better equipping participants to complete follow up actions from health-related DNA results.
    CONCLUSIONS: The All of Us Genetic Counseling Resource connects participants receiving health-related DNA results with relevant follow-up resources on a high-volume, national level. This has been made possible by the creation of a novel resource database and validation system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文介绍了阿尔茨海默病(AD)对公共卫生的影响,包括患病率和发病率,死亡率和发病率,护理的使用和成本以及AD对家庭护理人员的影响,痴呆症劳动力和社会。特别报告讨论了针对有认知问题的老年人的更大的医疗保健系统,重点关注护理人员和非医师医疗保健专业人员的作用。据估计,今天有690万65岁及以上的美国人患有阿尔茨海默氏症。到2060年,这个数字可能会增长到1380万,除非在预防或治疗AD方面取得医学突破。公元官方死亡证明记录了2021年公元119,399人死亡。2020年和2021年,当COVID-19进入十大死因行列时,阿尔茨海默氏症是美国第七大死因。近年来的官方统计仍在编制中。在65岁及以上的美国人中,阿尔茨海默氏症仍然是第五大死因。从2000年到2021年,中风死亡,心脏病和艾滋病毒减少,而报告的AD死亡增加了140%以上。2023年,超过1100万家庭成员和其他无偿护理人员为阿尔茨海默氏症或其他痴呆症患者提供了约184亿小时的护理。这些数字反映了与十年前相比,护理人员的数量有所减少,以及每个剩余护理人员提供的护理量增加。2023年,无偿痴呆症护理的价值为3466亿美元。其成本,然而,延伸到无薪照顾者,“情绪困扰和负面的精神和身体健康结果的风险增加。付费医疗保健和更广泛的社区劳动力的成员参与诊断,治疗和照顾痴呆症患者。然而,由于多种因素的共同作用,美国在痴呆症护理工作的不同部门面临着越来越多的短缺,包括痴呆症患者数量的绝对增加。因此,需要有针对性的计划和护理交付模式来吸引,更好地培训和有效部署医疗保健和社区工作者,以提供痴呆症护理。为65岁及以上患有AD或其他痴呆症的受益人提供服务的每人平均医疗保险付款几乎是没有这些条件的受益人付款的三倍。和医疗补助支付超过22倍。2024年医疗保健支付总额,为65岁及以上的痴呆症患者提供的长期护理和临终关怀服务估计为3600亿美元。特别报告调查了有认知问题的老年人的护理人员如何与医疗保健系统互动,并研究了非医师医疗保健专业人员在促进临床护理和获得基于社区的服务和支持方面的作用。它包括对护理人员和医护人员的调查,专注于他们的经历,挑战,对痴呆症护理导航的认识和看法。
    This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD), including prevalence and incidence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care and the ramifications of AD for family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses the larger health care system for older adults with cognitive issues, focusing on the role of caregivers and non-physician health care professionals. An estimated 6.9 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer\'s dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060, barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent or cure AD. Official AD death certificates recorded 119,399 deaths from AD in 2021. In 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death, Alzheimer\'s was the seventh-leading cause of death in the United States. Official counts for more recent years are still being compiled. Alzheimer\'s remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2021, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 140%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.4 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer\'s or other dementias in 2023. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $346.6 billion in 2023. Its costs, however, extend to unpaid caregivers\' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Members of the paid health care and broader community-based workforce are involved in diagnosing, treating and caring for people with dementia. However, the United States faces growing shortages across different segments of the dementia care workforce due to a combination of factors, including the absolute increase in the number of people living with dementia. Therefore, targeted programs and care delivery models will be needed to attract, better train and effectively deploy health care and community-based workers to provide dementia care. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2024 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $360 billion. The Special Report investigates how caregivers of older adults with cognitive issues interact with the health care system and examines the role non-physician health care professionals play in facilitating clinical care and access to community-based services and supports. It includes surveys of caregivers and health care workers, focusing on their experiences, challenges, awareness and perceptions of dementia care navigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血液透析患者有复杂的医疗诊断和用药方案,需要获得众多的医疗服务和咨询各种医疗保健提供者。虽然跨专业合作可以优化血液透析患者之间的护理,这些患者通常会遇到与药物相关的问题,并且由于沟通失误和药物管理不善而频繁住院.
    本研究旨在捕捉血液透析患者的生活经历,以揭示他们在各种门诊服务之间进行持续护理时的药物管理需求。
    采用定性方法探讨血液透析患者的观点。一对一,面对面,半结构化访谈在位于城市教学医院内的门诊血液透析诊所进行.通过随机选择在诊所接受随访至少三个月的18岁及以上的讲英语的成年人,方便采样。访谈被记录并逐字转录。招募患者并迭代地收集数据并持续直到达到数据饱和。使用一般归纳方法通过以患者为中心的护理的选取器原则的镜头分析数据。
    共进行了9次访谈。两大主题,药物管理和护理导航,已确定。尽管患者对他们的药物有丰富的知识,他们有动力自我管理药物以提高他们的幸福感,他们经历了药物管理的障碍。患者进一步表达了导航护理的挑战,并谈到了与关注他们需求的医疗保健提供者保持良好融洽的重要性。
    结果表明,需要改善对自我护理和跨专业合作的支持,以可能减轻患者的药物负担和护理分散,并改善患者护理的连续性。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients on hemodialysis have complex medical diagnoses and medication regimens, requiring access to numerous health services and consultation with various healthcare providers. While interprofessional collaboration can optimize care among hemodialysis patients, these patients commonly experience medication-related problems and frequent hospitalizations resulting from miscommunications and mismanagement of medications.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to capture the lived experiences of patients on hemodialysis to reveal their medication management needs as they navigate ongoing care between various outpatient services.
    UNASSIGNED: A qualitative methodology was used to explore the perspectives of hemodialysis patients. One-on-one, in-person, semi-structured interviews were conducted at an outpatient hemodialysis clinic located inside an urban teaching hospital. English-speaking adults 18 years and older who have been followed at the clinic for at least three months were selected through random, convenience sampling. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Patients were recruited and data were collected iteratively and continued until data saturation was reached. Data was analyzed through the lens of the Picker Principles of Patient Centered Care using a general inductive approach.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of nine interviews were conducted. Two major themes, medication management and care navigation, were identified. Though patients had a wealth of knowledge about their medications, and they were motivated to self-manage their medications to enhance their well-being, they experienced barriers with medication management. Patients further expressed challenges with navigating care and spoke of the importance of having good rapport with healthcare providers who are attentive to their needs.
    UNASSIGNED: The results revealed a need for improved support for self-care and interprofessional collaboration to possibly reduce the burden of medications and care fragmentation experienced by patients and improve continuity of care for patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在探索管理和项目人员对算法支持的护理导航模型的试点实施的看法,针对有再次入院风险的人。该试点于2017年5月至11月在维多利亚州卫生服务机构(澳大利亚)实施,并向65名从医院出院到社区的患者提供。所有管理人员和所涉及的单个临床医生都参加了半结构化访谈。参与者(n=6)被问及他们对服务设计的看法以及实施的推动者和障碍。访谈被逐字转录,并根据框架方法进行分析,使用归纳和演绎技术。构造的主题包括以下内容:仅靠算法是不够的,卫生服务文化,领导力,资源和感知的患者体验。参与者认为,有一个算法来针对那些被认为最有可能受益的人是有帮助的,但在不解决其他环境因素的情况下,仅靠它自己是不够的。例如卫生服务支持大规模实施的能力。将主题演绎为卫生服务研究实施综合促进行动(i-PARIHS)框架(i-PARIHS)强调,正式的便利对于未来的可持续实施至关重要。对障碍和推动者的系统识别为更广泛地实现算法支持的护理模型提供了关键信息。
    We aimed to explore managerial and project staff perceptions of the pilot implementation of an algorithm-supported care navigation model, targeting people at risk of hospital readmission. The pilot was implemented from May to November 2017 at a Victorian health service (Australia) and provided to sixty-five patients discharged from the hospital to the community. All managers and the single clinician involved participated in a semi-structured interview. Participants (n = 6) were asked about their perceptions of the service design and the enablers and barriers to implementation. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed according to a framework approach, using inductive and deductive techniques. Constructed themes included the following: an algorithm alone is not enough, the health service culture, leadership, resources and the perceived patient experience. Participants felt that having an algorithm to target those considered most likely to benefit was helpful but not enough on its own without addressing other contextual factors, such as the health service\'s capacity to support a large-scale implementation. Deductively mapping themes to the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework highlighted that a formal facilitation would be essential for future sustainable implementations. The systematic identification of barriers and enablers elicited critical information for broader implementations of algorithm-supported models of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:识别物质使用障碍(SUDs)患者的急性护理干预措施,开始治疗,并将患者与社区服务联系起来,近年来激增。然而,目前尚不清楚用于支持从急诊科(ED)或住院医院到基于社区的SUD治疗的连续性护理的具体策略.在这次范围审查中,我们综合了现有的关于患者过渡干预的文献,并形成报告策略的初始类型学。
    方法:我们搜索了Pubmed,Embase,CINAHL和PsychINFO在2000年至2021年之间发表了同行评审的文章,研究了将ED或住院医院的SUD患者与社区SUD服务联系起来的干预措施。符合条件的文章测量了至少一个出院后治疗结果,并描述了用于促进与社区护理联系的策略。在过渡策略的组成部分上提取了详细信息,并使用主题编码过程将策略分类为基于共享特征的类型学。使用实施研究综合框架综合了促进者和护理过渡的障碍。
    结果:45篇文章符合纳入标准。62%包括ED干预措施,44%包括住院干预措施。大多数集中在阿片类药物(71%)或酒精(31%)使用障碍的患者。跨研究报告的过渡策略是异质的,通常没有很好的描述。十个过渡战略的初始类型,提出了五种出院前过渡策略和五种出院后过渡策略。最常见的策略是在出院前安排与社区治疗提供者的预约。描述了一系列促进者和障碍,这可以为改善医院到社区的护理过渡提供信息。
    结论:支持从急性护理过渡到基于社区的SUD服务的策略,尽管对于确保护理的连续性至关重要,不同的干预措施差异很大,测量和描述不一致。需要更多的研究来对SUD护理过渡策略进行分类,了解它们的组成部分,并探索哪种方法可以带来最好的患者结果。
    Acute-care interventions that identify patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), initiate treatment, and link patients to community-based services, have proliferated in recent years. Yet, much is unknown about the specific strategies being used to support continuity of care from emergency department (ED) or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD treatment. In this scoping review, we synthesize the existing literature on patient transition interventions, and form an initial typology of reported strategies.
    We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2021 that studied interventions linking patients with SUD from ED or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD services. Eligible articles measured at least one post-discharge treatment outcome and included a description of the strategy used to promote linkage to community care. Detailed information was extracted on the components of the transition strategies and a thematic coding process was used to categorize strategies into a typology based on shared characteristics. Facilitators and barriers to transitions of care were synthesized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
    Forty-five articles met inclusion criteria. 62% included ED interventions and 44% inpatient interventions. The majority focused on patients with opioid (71%) or alcohol (31%) use disorder. The transition strategies reported across studies were heterogeneous and often not well described. An initial typology of ten transition strategies, including five pre- and five post-discharge transition strategies is proposed. The most common strategy was scheduling an appointment with a community-based treatment provider prior to discharge. A range of facilitators and barriers were described, which can inform efforts to improve hospital-to-community transitions of care.
    Strategies to support transitions from acute-care to community-based SUD services, although critical for ensuring continuity of care, vary greatly across interventions and are inconsistently measured and described. More research is needed to classify SUD care transition strategies, understand their components, and explore which lead to the best patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    护理导航是指对患者获得初级保健和其他相关服务的支持。自2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行以来,英国数字化医疗的扩张导致了对数字医疗导航的更大需求:支持人们以数字方式获得初级保健,如有必要,帮助他们找到替代的非数字访问路线。支持有社会护理需求的患者(包括但不限于那些无家可归和不安全的人,生活在寄宿护理中并由住所照料者提供支持)越来越多地涉及到远程提供和数字访问的初级保健的工作。对这项工作是如何完成的知之甚少。
    护理导航涉及嵌入式研究人员,为11个GP实践中的患者识别数字护理导航,这些实践被招募到远程初级保健的链接研究(远程护理作为“新常态”)。数字护理导航将通过持续(面对面或远程)采访进行研究,样本为20人提供正式(付费或自愿)支持。6个国家和区域利益攸关方,他们计划,委托或提供数字护理导航和一个由12名社会开处方者参与数字护理导航的焦点小组。一个与工作的人一起设计的研讨会,或调试,社会护理机构将考虑调查结果如何为改进的数字护理导航提供信息,例如,通过开发资源或为护理导航员提供指导。
    研究结果预计将包括如何实施数字护理导航的证据,为支持患者获得远程初级保健所做的工作,以及这项工作是如何由物质资源和服务和基础设施配置的变化形成的。
    对导航数字护理所需工作的新解释将为旨在帮助患者从远程初级保健中受益的政策和服务发展提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Care navigation refers to support for patients accessing primary care and other related services. The expansion of digitally enabled care in the UK since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a greater need for digital care navigation: supporting people to access primary care digitally and, if necessary, to help them find alternative non-digital routes of access. Support to patients with social care needs (including but not limited to those who are homeless and insecurely housed, living in residential care and supported by domiciliary carers) increasingly involves work to navigate primary care provided remotely and accessed digitally. There is little knowledge about how this work is being done.
    UNASSIGNED: Care Navigation involves embedded researchers identifying digital care navigation for patients accessing services in 11 GP practices recruited to a linked study of remote primary care ( Remote care as the \'new normal?\'). Digital care navigation will be studied through go-along (in-person or remote) interviews with a sample of 20 people offering formal (paid or voluntary) support, 6 national and regional stakeholders who plan, commission or provide digital care navigation and a focus group with 12 social prescribers engaged in digital care navigation. A co-design workshop with people working in, or commissioning, social care settings will consider how findings can inform improved digital care navigation, for example through the development of resources or guidance for care navigators.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings are anticipated to include evidence of how digital care navigation is practised, the work that is done to support patients in accessing remote primary care, and how this work is shaped by material resources and variations in the configuration of services and infrastructure.
    UNASSIGNED: New explanations of the work needed to navigate digital care will inform policy and service developments aimed at helping patients benefit from remote primary care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估案例插图的能力,以评估症状检查器应用程序的性能,并建议对基于案例插图的审计研究中使用的方法进行改进。
    我们通过计算测试理论的常见指标,重新分析了两个突出的基于案例插图的症状检查器审计研究的公开可用数据。此外,我们开发了一个新的指标,能力比较评分(CCS),它比较症状检查器的能力,同时控制每个症状检查器评估的病例集的难度。然后,我们仔细检查了应用测试理论和CCS是否改变了所调查症状检查人员的性能排名。
    在这两项研究中,大多数症状检查者在使用CCS调整项目难度(ID)的分诊能力时改变了他们的等级顺序.先前报告的分诊准确性通常高估了症状检查者的能力,因为它们没有考虑到症状检查者倾向于选择性地评估较容易的病例(即,具有较高的ID值)。此外,两项研究中的许多案例插图显示项目总相关性(ITC)值不足(非常低甚至为负),这表明单个项目或项目集的组成质量较低。
    测试理论的观点有助于识别以前未被发现的对基于案例插图的症状检查器评估有效性的威胁,并提供指导和具体指标以提高案例插图的质量,特别是通过控制小插曲的难度,应用程序(不能)能够正确评估。对于症状检查者的竞争性评估,这些措施可能比单独的准确性更有意义。我们的方法有助于阐述和标准化用于评估症状检查器能力的方法,which,最终,可能会产生更可靠的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the ability of case vignettes to assess the performance of symptom checker applications and to suggest refinements to the methodology used in case vignette-based audit studies.
    UNASSIGNED: We re-analyzed the publicly available data of two prominent case vignette-based symptom checker audit studies by calculating common metrics of test theory. Furthermore, we developed a new metric, the Capability Comparison Score (CCS), which compares symptom checker capability while controlling for the difficulty of the set of cases each symptom checker evaluated. We then scrutinized whether applying test theory and the CCS altered the performance ranking of the investigated symptom checkers.
    UNASSIGNED: In both studies, most symptom checkers changed their rank order when adjusting the triage capability for item difficulty (ID) with the CCS. The previously reported triage accuracies commonly overestimated the capability of symptom checkers because they did not account for the fact that symptom checkers tend to selectively appraise easier cases (i.e., with high ID values). Also, many case vignettes in both studies showed insufficient (very low and even negative) values of item-total correlation (ITC), suggesting that individual items or the composition of item sets are of low quality.
    UNASSIGNED: A test-theoretic perspective helps identify previously undetected threats to the validity of case vignette-based symptom checker assessments and provides guidance and specific metrics to improve the quality of case vignettes, in particular by controlling for the difficulty of the vignettes an app was (not) able to evaluate correctly. Such measures might prove more meaningful than accuracy alone for the competitive assessment of symptom checkers. Our approach helps elaborate and standardize the methodology used for appraising symptom checker capability, which, ultimately, may yield more reliable results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着医疗和患者护理系统的复杂性增加,病人导航的概念在普及和应用的广度上都在增长。病人导航员是经过培训的人员,其作用不是提供临床护理,而是与患者合作,帮助他们确定他们的需求和目标,然后克服可修改的患者-,提供者-,和系统级障碍。由于其发病率高,持续时间,和医学社会的复杂性,痴呆症是以患者为中心的医疗保健提供模式(如护理导航)的理想候选者。
    方法:阿尔茨海默氏症协会成立了一个由痴呆症护理导航领域的研究人员组成的专家工作组,以确定基于证据的指南。
    结果:认识到痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴的独特和具有挑战性的需求,近年来,美国已经开发并评估了几项痴呆症护理导航计划.这些计划共同表明,痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴受益于痴呆症护理导航。改善痴呆症患者的护理系统结果包括减少急诊就诊,降低医院再入院率,住院天数减少,和较短的长期护理安置延迟。幸福也增加了,随着抑郁症的减少,疾病,应变,尴尬,行为症状和自我报告的生活质量提高。对于护理伙伴来说,痴呆导航导致抑郁减少,负担,和未满足的需求。
    结论:本文介绍了痴呆症护理导航的原则,以告知现有和新兴的痴呆症护理导航计划。
    美国几项痴呆症护理导航计划已经证明了痴呆症患者的预后,护理伙伴,和卫生系统。阿尔茨海默氏症协会成立了一个由痴呆症护理导航领域的研究人员组成的专家工作组,以创建一个共享的定义并确定基于证据的指南或原则。这些概述的痴呆症护理导航原则可以为现有和新兴的痴呆症护理导航计划提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: As the complexity of medical treatments and patient care systems have increased, the concept of patient navigation is growing in both popularity and breadth of application. Patient navigators are trained personnel whose role is not to provide clinical care, but to partner with patients to help them identify their needs and goals and then overcome modifiable patient-, provider-, and systems-level barriers. Due to its high incidence, duration, and medical-social complexity, dementia is an ideal candidate for a patient-centric health care delivery model such as care navigation.
    METHODS: The Alzheimer\'s Association formed an expert workgroup of researchers in the field of dementia care navigation to identify evidence-based guidelines.
    RESULTS: Recognizing the unique and challenging needs of persons living with dementia and their care partners, several U.S. dementia care navigation programs have been developed and assessed in recent years. Collectively these programs demonstrate that persons living with dementia and their care partners benefit from dementia care navigation. Improved care system outcomes for the person living with dementia include reduced emergency department visits, lower hospital readmissions, fewer days hospitalized, and shorter delays in long-term care placement. Well-being is also increased, as there is decreased depression, illness, strain, embarrassment, and behavioral symptoms and increased self-reported quality of life. For care partners, dementia navigation resulted in decreased depression, burden, and unmet needs.
    CONCLUSIONS: This article presents principles of dementia care navigation to inform existing and emerging dementia care navigation programs.
    UNASSIGNED: Several U.S. dementia care navigation programs have demonstrated outcomes for persons living with dementia, care partners, and health systems.The Alzheimer\'s Association formed an expert workgroup of researchers in the field of dementia care navigation to create a shared definition and identify evidence-based guidelines or principles.These outlined principles of dementia care navigation can inform existing and emerging dementia care navigation programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    识别患有物质使用障碍(SUDs)的患者的急性护理干预措施,开始治疗,并将患者与社区服务联系起来,近年来激增。然而,目前尚不清楚用于支持从急诊科(ED)或住院医院到基于社区的SUD治疗的连续性护理的具体策略.在这次范围审查中,我们综合了现有的关于患者过渡干预的文献,并形成报告策略的初始类型学。
    我们搜索了Pubmed,Embase,CINAHL和PsychINFO在2000年至2021年之间发表了同行评审的文章,研究了将ED或住院医院的SUD患者与社区SUD服务联系起来的干预措施。符合条件的文章测量了至少一个出院后治疗结果,并描述了用于促进与社区护理联系的策略。在过渡策略的组成部分上提取了详细信息,并使用主题编码过程将策略分类为基于共享特征的类型学。使用实施研究综合框架综合了促进者和护理过渡的障碍。
    45篇文章符合纳入标准。62%包括ED干预措施,44%包括住院干预措施。大多数患者集中在阿片类药物(71%),其次是酒精(31%)使用障碍。跨研究报告的过渡策略是异质的,通常没有很好的描述。十个过渡战略的初始类型,提出了五种出院前过渡策略和五种出院后过渡策略。最常见的策略是在出院前安排与社区治疗提供者的预约。描述了一系列促进者和障碍,这可以为改善医院到社区的护理过渡提供信息。
    支持从急性护理过渡到基于社区的SUD服务的策略,尽管对于确保护理的连续性至关重要,不同的干预措施差异很大,测量和描述不一致。需要更多的研究来对SUD护理过渡策略进行分类,了解它们的组成部分,并探索哪种方法可以带来最好的患者结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute-care interventions that identify patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), initiate treatment, and link patients to community-based services, have proliferated in recent years. Yet, much is unknown about the specific strategies being used to support continuity of care from emergency department (ED) or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD treatment. In this scoping review, we synthesize the existing literature on patient transition interventions, and form an initial typology of reported strategies.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000-2021 that studied interventions linking SUD patients from ED or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD services. Eligible articles measured at least one post-discharge treatment outcome and included a description of the strategy used to promote linkage to community care. Detailed information was extracted on the components of the transition strategies and a thematic coding process was used to categorize strategies into a typology based on shared characteristics. Facilitators and barriers to transitions of care were synthesized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-five articles met inclusion criteria. 62% included ED interventions and 44% inpatient interventions. The majority focused on patients with opioid (71%) followed by alcohol (31%) use disorder. The transition strategies reported across studies were heterogeneous and often not well described. An initial typology of ten transition strategies, including five pre- and five post-discharge transition strategies is proposed. The most common strategy was scheduling an appointment with a community-based treatment provider prior to discharge. A range of facilitators and barriers were described, which can inform efforts to improve hospital-to-community transitions of care.
    UNASSIGNED: Strategies to support transitions from acute-care to community-based SUD services, although critical for ensuring continuity of care, vary greatly across interventions and are inconsistently measured and described. More research is needed to classify SUD care transition strategies, understand their components, and explore which lead to the best patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    许多认知障碍患者的护理人员花费大量时间来帮助具有辅助日常功能的患者。分布式护理是一种创新模式,旨在减少个人护理人员的时间负担,并增加患者继续独立生活的可能性。EchoShow和GoogleHome平台用于使远程家庭成员参与护理,特别是认知障碍患者的社交和娱乐。照顾者的采访,医疗记录的审查,并采用案例研究分析来衡量照顾者负担,在通过人在圈人工智能将照顾的一些组成部分分配给遥远的家庭成员之后。这个案例探讨了Alexa的使用,回声秀,和其他商业技术在认知障碍患者的管理。在这个案例研究中引入的人在环系统是一个创造性的,可访问,低成本,和可持续的方式,以潜在的减少照顾者的负担,并通过有针对性的干预改善患者的结果。有针对性的分布式护理减少了护理时间,减少照顾者的内疚和沮丧,提高患者对行为改变请求的依从性(例如,离开家之前作废),并改善了照顾者与认知障碍者之间的关系。这个案例研究展示了分布式护理,包括人在圈人工智能,可以更好地使用技术来减少认知障碍患者的社会隔离并减轻照顾者的负担。
    Many caregivers of people with cognitive impairment spend a significant amount of their time helping patients with instrumental daily functions. Distributed caregiving is an innovative model designed to reduce an individual caregiver\'s time burden and increase the likelihood of continued independent living for the patient. Echo Show and Google Home platforms were used to enable the participation of remote family members in caregiving, specifically the socialization and entertainment of a person with cognitive impairment. Caregiver interviews, review of medical records, and case study analysis were used to measure caregiver burden, after distributing some components of caregiving to distant family members with human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence. This case explores the use of Alexa, Echo Show, and other commercial technologies in the management of a patient with cognitive impairment. The human-in-the-loop system introduced in this case study is a creative, accessible, low-cost, and sustainable way to potentially reduce caregiver burden and improve patient outcomes with targeted intervention. Targeted distributed caregiving reduced time spent in caregiving, reduced caregiver guilt and frustration, improved patient\'s compliance with requests for behavior changes (e.g., voiding before leaving the house), and improved the relationship between the caregiver and the person with cognitive impairment. This case study demonstrates how distributed caregiving, including human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence, can lead to better use of technology in reducing the social isolation of persons with cognitive impairment and in reducing caregiver burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号