BACKGROUND: The incidence of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is on the rise among individuals aged 70 and older. While the gold standard for treatment remains surgical resection, some elderly and frail patients with comorbidities are not eligible for this procedure. In selected cases, percutaneous thermal ablation, such as cryotherapy, microwave and radiofrequency, offers less invasive options. General anesthesia is sometimes necessary for such treatments, but most of the procedures can be conducted using mild or deep conscious sedation. This approach is preferably recommended for small cT1a tumors situated at a distance from the renal hilum and/or ureter. Active surveillance remains an alternative in the case of small low grade RCC although it may induce anxiety in certain patients. Recent research has highlighted the potentials of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) as a noninvasive, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for small renal tumors. This narrative review aims to explore recent advances in SABR for localized RCC, including appropriate patient selection, treatment modalities and administration, as well as efficacy and tolerance assessment.
METHODS: We conducted a literature review using the terms [kidney cancer], [renal cell carcinoma], [stereotactic radiotherapy], [SBRT], and [SABR] in the Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases, focusing on prospective and relevant retrospective studies published in English.
RESULTS: Studies report local control rates ranging from 70% to 100% with SABR, highlighting its efficacy in treating RCC. The decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is approximately -5 to -17mL/min over the years following SABR. Common toxicities are rare, primarily CTCAE grade 1, include fatigue, nausea, chest or back pain, diarrhea, or gastritis.
CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be considered as a viable option for patients with localized RCC who are not suitable candidates for surgery with a high local control rate and a favorable safety profile. This approach should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting and results from ongoing clinical trials are awaited.
METHODS:

Metastatic bladder and renal cancers account respectively for 2.1% and 1.8% of cancer deaths worldwide. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the management of metastatic disease, by demonstrating considerable improvements in overall survival. However, despite initial sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors for most patients, both bladder and renal cancer are associated with short progression-free survival and overall survival, raising the need for further strategies to improve their efficacy. Combining systemic therapies with local approaches is a longstanding concept in urological oncology, in clinical settings including both oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease. Radiation therapy has been increasingly studied with either cytoreductive, consolidative, ablative or immune boosting purposes, but the long-term impact of this strategy remains unclear. This review intends to address the impact of radiation therapy with either curative or palliative intent, for synchronous de novo metastatic bladder and renal cancers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the morbidity and mortality, as well as the oncogical results of patients who had undergone surgical procedure for a kidney cancer with thrombus extension into the inferior vena cava.
METHODS: Between January 2004 and April 2020, 57 patients were operated by enlarged nephrectomy with thrombectomy for kidney cancer with thrombus extension in the inferior vena cava. Twelve patients (21%) with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass because the thrombus was upper than the sus-hepatic veins. Twenty-three patients (40.4%) were metastatic at diagnosis.
RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was 10.5%, without difference according to surgical technique. Morbidity during hospitalization was 58%, without difference according to surgical technique. Median follow-up was 40.8±40.1months. Overall survival at 2 and 5years was 60% and 28%, respectively. At 5years, the principal prognostic factor was the metastatic status at diagnosis, in multivariate analysis (OR: 0.15, P=0.03). Progression free survival mean was 28.2±40.2months. Progression free survival at 2 and 5years was 28% and 18%, respectively. All the patients who were metastatic at diagnosis had a recurrence in an average time of 5.7months (median of 3months). Thirteen percent of patients can be considered cured at the end of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality of this surgery remain important. The metastatic status at diagnosis has appeared to be the principal prognostic factor on the survival of these patients.
METHODS: Level 4: retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations for the management of kidney cancers.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted from 2015 to 2022. The most relevant articles on the diagnosis, classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment and follow-up of kidney cancer were selected and incorporated into the recommendations. Therefore, the recommendations were updated while specifying the level of evidence (high or low).
RESULTS: The gold standard for the diagnosis and evaluation of kidney cancer is contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal CT. MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are indicated in special cases. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended in situations where the results will influence the therapeutic decision. Renal tumours should be classified according to the pTNM 2017 classification, the WHO 2022 classification and the ISUP nucleolar grade. Metastatic kidney cancer should be classified according to the IMDC criteria. Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard treatment for T1a tumours and can be performed by an open approach, by laparoscopy or by robot-guidance. Active surveillance of tumours less than 2cm in size can be considered regardless of the patient\'s age. Ablative therapies and active surveillance are options in elderly patients with comorbidity. T1b tumours should be treated by partial or radical nephrectomy depending on the complexity of the tumour. Radical nephrectomy is the first-line treatment for locally advanced cancers. Adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab should be considered in patients at intermediate and high risk for recurrence after nephrectomy. In metastatic patients: Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy may be offered to oligometastatic patients in combination with local treatment of metastases if this can be complete and delayed cytoreductive nephrectomy can be proposed for patients with a complete response or a significant partial response. Medical treatment should be proposed as first-line therapy for patients with a poor or intermediate prognosis. Surgical or local treatment of metastases can be proposed in case of single or oligo-metastases. The recommended first-line drugs for metastatic patients with clear cell renal carcinoma are the combinations axitinib/pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipililumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab. Cabozantinib is the recommended first-line treatment for patients with metastatic papillary carcinoma. Cystic tumours should be classified according to the Bosniak classification. Surgical removal should be proposed as a priority for Bosniak III and IV lesions. It is recommended that patient monitoring be adapted to the aggressiveness of the tumour.
CONCLUSIONS: These updated recommendations are a reference that will allow French and French-speaking practitioners to improve kidney cancer management.

暂无摘要。

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is evolving rapidly. In the era of antiangiogenic treatments, the Carmena trial showed no benefit of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy compared to sunitinib alone for patients with intermediate or poor prognosis. The Surtime trial suggests that deferred nephrectomy after initiation of systemic therapy may be a better strategy. In the current era of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the role and optimal timing of nephrectomy is still unknown. Delayed nephrectomy after response to systemic therapy seems to be an interesting approach, especially for residual kidney disease in patients with radiological complete response at metastatic sites, and may achieve good oncological outcomes in selected patients. However, due to the technical complexity and complication rates, post-immunotherapy surgery should be performed in expert centres. Surgery could also be integrated into the management of mRCC metastases and surgical resection may be discussed in selected cases.

Immunotherapy (IO) with checkpoint inhibitors with or without anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based combinations have demonstrated superior efficacy over sunitinib for treatment-naive patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Four of these combinations (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib) represent new front-line standard-of-care options for mRCC patients, according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) subgroups. Questions over the optimal treatment between IO-IO or IO-TKI combinations for mRCC patients in intermediate/poor IMDC risk groups and the optimal IO-TKI regimen for all IMDC risk groups remain unanswered. This review will focus on the biological pathways that have driven the hypothesis of a synergistic combination of such agents and their efficacy results, with consideration of response and survival outcomes in the overall population of phase three pivotal trials as well as in specific subgroups of interest.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were operated between 2004 and 2020 at our institution. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to graphically display survivor functions. Univariate and multivariate Cox\'s proportional hazards regression models were utilized to analyze the association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and oncological outcomes.
RESULTS: We included 202 patients. Patients with higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio had larger tumors (P=0.03), higher ASA score (P=0.014), clinical symptoms (P=0.04), sarcomatoid differentiation (P=0.03) and tumor necrosis (P=0.02). The rates of recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival were significantly lower in patients with a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio than in those with a low ratio (P=0.017; P=0.036 respectively). Multivariate analysis identified the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as an independent predictor of recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival (P=0.021; P=0.001 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: A higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has been associated with a symptomatic renal cancer with a significant prognostic factor for both recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival.
METHODS: 3.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have reported blood transfusion were associated with a decrease of survival after oncological surgery. For kidney cancer, the effect of blood transfusion is still debated. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of blood transfusion after oncological nephrectomy on overall, specific and recurrence-free survival in a retrospective cohort of localized or locally advanced kidney cancer.
METHODS: We performed a monocentric retrospective analysis of all patients managed by surgery for localized or locally advanced renal cancer between January 2000 and December 2016. We compared overall and specific survival and recurrence-free survival between two groups: patients transfused and not transfused. Demographic, surgical and tumor characteristics were compared. Survival analyses were performed using univariate Cox regression and multivariate Cox proportional regression test.
RESULTS: We included 382 patients in this study: 320 (83.8%) were not transfused and 62 (16.2%) were transfused. Transfused patients were significantly older (P=0.001) and had a lower pre-operative hemoglobin level (P=0.008). Operative and oncological characteristics were also different between both groups. In univariate analysis, we showed that blood transfusion was associated with lower overall survival (P<0.001), specific survival (P<0.001), and recurrence-free survival (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, we found that blood transfusion was not associated with overall survival, or specific survival, but it was associated with lower recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.967, CI95% [1.024-3.780], P=0.042).
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative blood transfusion is an independent risk factor that increases tumor recurrence among patients treated with nephrectomy for renal cancer.

Immunotherapy occupies a growing place in urologic oncology, mainly for kidney and bladder cancers. On the basis of encouraging preclinical work, the combination of immunotherapy with radiotherapy aims to increase the tumor response, including in metastatic tumors, which raises many hopes, which this article reviews.