CVD, Cardiovascular disease(s)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:DMagic试验表明,参与式学习和行动(PLA)社区动员是通过促进社区团体进行的,和mHealth语音信息干预改善了孟加拉国的糖尿病知识,解放军干预减少了糖尿病的发生。我们在干预活动停止三年后评估干预效果。
    未经评估:随机化后五年,我们对居住在96个DMagic村庄的30岁以上的成年人进行了横断面调查,和一组在2016年DMagic试验开始时确定为中度高血糖的个体。主要结果是:1)中度高血糖和糖尿病的合并患病率;2)2016年中度高血糖患者队列中糖尿病的五年累积发病率。次要结果是:体重,BMI,腰围和臀围,血压,知识和行为。初步分析比较了干预组与对照组之间集群水平的结果。
    UNASSIGNED:数据来自随机选择的1623名成年人(82%)和中度高血糖队列的1817名(87%)。2018年mHealth集群中糖尿病知识的改善在2021年不再可见。与对照组相比,PLA集群中的知识仍然明显更高,但在中间高血糖和糖尿病患病率(OR(95CI)1.23(0.89,1.70))或糖尿病五年发病率(1.04(0.78,1.40))的主要结局中没有差异。与对照组相比,PLA集群中的高血压(0.73(0.54,0.97))和高血压控制(2.77(1.34,5.75))得到了改善。
    UNASSIGNED:PLA对中度高血糖和糖尿病的干预效果在干预结束后3年未持续,但观察到血压降低方面的益处。
    UNASSIGNED:英国医学研究委员会:MR/M016501/1(DMagic试验);MR/T023562/1(DClare研究),在全球慢性病联盟(GACD)糖尿病和扩大计划下,分别。
    UNASSIGNED: The DMagic trial showed that participatory learning and action (PLA) community mobilisation delivered through facilitated community groups, and mHealth voice messaging interventions improved diabetes knowledge in Bangladesh and the PLA intervention reduced diabetes occurrence. We assess intervention effects three years after intervention activities stopped.
    UNASSIGNED: Five years post-randomisation, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among a random sample of adults aged ≥30-years living in the 96 DMagic villages, and a cohort of individuals identified with intermediate hyperglycaemia at the start of the DMagic trial in 2016. Primary outcomes were: 1) the combined prevalence of intermediate hyperglycaemia and diabetes; 2) five-year cumulative incidence of diabetes among the 2016 cohort of individuals with intermediate hyperglycaemia. Secondary outcomes were: weight, BMI, waist and hip circumferences, blood pressure, knowledge and behaviours. Primary analysis compared outcomes at the cluster level between intervention arms relative to control.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were gathered from 1623 (82%) of the randomly selected adults and 1817 (87%) of the intermediate hyperglycaemia cohort. 2018 improvements in diabetes knowledge in mHealth clusters were no longer observable in 2021. Knowledge remains significantly higher in PLA clusters relative to control but no difference in primary outcomes of intermediate hyperglycaemia and diabetes prevalence (OR (95%CI) 1.23 (0.89, 1.70)) or five-year incidence of diabetes were observed (1.04 (0.78, 1.40)). Hypertension (0.73 (0.54, 0.97)) and hypertension control (2.77 (1.34, 5.75)) were improved in PLA clusters relative to control.
    UNASSIGNED: PLA intervention effect on intermediate hyperglycaemia and diabetes was not sustained at 3 years after intervention end, but benefits in terms of blood pressure reduction were observed.
    UNASSIGNED: Medical Research Council UK: MR/M016501/1 (DMagic trial); MR/T023562/1 (DClare study), under the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases (GACD) Diabetes and Scale-up Programmes, respectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:尽管对有心血管诊断或事件的患者有良好的疗效,由于系统层面的障碍和患者层面的因素,基于运动的心脏康复计划的参与和完成度仍然低得惊人.患者心理健康,尤其是抑郁症,现在被认为与入学人数减少显著相关,参与,出席,完成心脏康复计划.最近,焦虑敏感性已经成为一种独立的结构,与抑郁和焦虑有关但又不同。据报道,焦虑敏感性与参与锻炼有不利关系,因此,可能对心脏康复患者很重要。因此,这项研究的目的是进行范围审查,以总结焦虑敏感性和心血管疾病危险因素之间关联的证据,锻炼,和心脏康复的临床结果。
    未经评估:正式范围审查,遵循PRISMA-ScR准则,进行了。搜索MEDLINE,WebofScience,CINAHL,PSYCINFO,进行了Scopus数据库,辅以手工搜索;包括截至2020年12月发表的研究。初始筛选基于标题和摘要,第二阶段筛选基于全文检查。
    未经评估:最终搜索结果包括28项研究。研究报告了焦虑敏感性和运动之间的统计学显著关联,心血管疾病,参与心脏康复。许多研究,然而,在非临床中进行,以社区为基础的人群;在心血管疾病和心脏康复临床患者人群中进行的研究很少。此外,我们对焦虑敏感性之间复杂关系的性别差异的理解仍然存在显著差距,运动和心脏康复。
    UNASSIGNED:需要更多研究来了解临床心血管疾病患者和心脏康复计划参与者的焦虑敏感性与临床结果之间的特定关联。在未来的研究中,应研究焦虑敏感性的治疗以优化心脏康复计划的临床结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite well-established efficacy for patients with a cardiovascular diagnosis or event, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program participation and completion has remained alarmingly low due to both system-level barriers and patient-level factors. Patient mental health, particularly depression, is now recognized as significantly associated with reduced enrollment, participation, attendance, and completion of a cardiac rehabilitation program. More recently, anxiety sensitivity has emerged as an independent construct, related to but distinct from both depression and anxiety. Anxiety sensitivity has been reported to be adversely associated with participation in exercise and, thus, may be important for patients in cardiac rehabilitation. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review to summarize the evidence for associations between anxiety sensitivity and cardiovascular disease risk factors, exercise, and clinical outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation.
    UNASSIGNED: A formal scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, was undertaken. Searches of MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PSYCINFO, and Scopus databases were conducted, supplemented by hand searches; studies published through December of 2020 were included. The initial screening was based on titles and abstracts and the second stage of screening was based on full text examination.
    UNASSIGNED: The final search results included 28 studies. Studies reported statistically significant associations between anxiety sensitivity and exercise, cardiovascular disease, and participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Many studies, however, were conducted in non-clinical, community-based populations; there were few studies conducted in cardiovascular disease and cardiac rehabilitation clinical patient populations. Additionally, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the sex-based differences in the complex relationships between anxiety sensitivity, exercise and cardiac rehabilitation.
    UNASSIGNED: More research is needed to understand specific associations between anxiety sensitivity and clinical outcomes among clinical cardiovascular disease patients and participants in cardiac rehabilitation programs. Treatment of anxiety sensitivity to optimize clinical outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation programs should be investigated in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号