CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝硬化的自然史通常是在从代偿性肝硬化发展到随后的代偿失调阶段的背景下概念化的。虽然这种单向概念是最常见的病理生理轨迹,对接受再补偿的患者亚组有了新的认识.虽然主要基于移植候补名单登记处的文献表明,对于这种经历疾病消退的人群,关于这个实体的整体文献仍然不明确。已尝试就定义补偿达成共识,这具有其自身的细微差别和局限性。我们总结了有关肝硬化中这种新兴但有争议的再补偿概念的现有文献,并深入研究了对现实生活实践的未来影响和影响。
    The natural history of cirrhosis has usually been conceptualized in the context of progression from compensated cirrhosis to subsequent stages of decompensation. While this unidirectional concept is the most common pathophysiological trajectory, there has been an emerging understanding of a subgroup of patients which undergo recompensation. While literature mostly based on transplant waitlist registries have indicated towards such a population who experience disease regression, the overall literature about this entity remains inexplicit. An effort to generate consensus on defining recompensation has been attempted which comes with its own nuances and limitations. We summarize the available literature on this emerging yet controversial concept of recompensation in cirrhosis and delve into future implications and impact on real-life practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性肝病(CLD)是发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一。CLD患者的总体寿命增加,这些患者接受的外科手术数量也增加了。肝硬化的病理生理和血流动力学变化使这些患者在手术期间更容易发生低血压和缺氧。它们也有很高的药物性肝损伤风险,肾功能不全和术后肝脏失代偿。计划进行选择性或半选择性手术的CLD患者应进行详细的术前风险评估。应评估患者是否存在临床上显着的门脉高压和肝硬化。在没有肝硬化和临床显著门脉高压的情况下,CLD患者可以接受最小或低风险的手术.可用于晚期CLD患者的各种风险评估工具are-CTP评分,MELD评分,梅奥风险评分,VOCAL-Penn得分。儿童C级和/或Mayo风险评分>15通常与术后死亡的高风险相关,这些患者的择期手术应推迟。在儿童类的患者中,A和MELD10-15手术是谨慎允许的(肝脏切除和心脏手术除外),而在ChildA和MELD<10手术中,耐受性良好。VOCAL-Penn评分是一种新的有前途的工具,可以成为CTP的更好选择,MELD,和Mayo风险评分模型,但更多针对大患者人群的前瞻性研究是有必要的。某些手术像肝切除术,腹内,与腹壁疝修补术和骨科手术相比,心胸手术的风险更高。腹腔镜手术比开腹手术有更好的结果和更低的肝衰竭风险。在高危病例中可以考虑微创替代方案,如在阻塞情况下放置结肠支架。围手术期腹水的优化和管理,他,出血,肝脏代偿失调,营养应该用多学科的方法来完成。接受高风险择期手术的肝硬化患者可在术后发生肝功能衰竭,如果没有禁忌,应进行评估并建议进行肝移植。
    Chronic liver diseases (CLD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. The overall life span of patients with CLD has increased and so is the number of surgical procedures these patients undergo. Pathophysiological and hemodynamic changes in cirrhosis make these patients more susceptible to hypotension and hypoxia during surgery. They also have a high risk of drug induced liver injury, renal dysfunction and post-operative liver decompensation. Patients with CLD planned for elective or semi-elective surgery should undergo detailed preoperative risk assessment. Patients should be evaluated for the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension and cirrhosis. In the absence of both cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension, patients with CLD can undergo surgery with minimal or low risk. Various risk assessment tools available for patients with advanced CLD are-CTP score, MELD Score, Mayo risk score, VOCAL-Penn score. A Child class C and/or Mayo risk score >15 in general is associated with high risk of post-operative mortality and elective surgery should be deferred in these patients. In patients with Child class, A and MELD 10-15 surgery is permissible with caution (except liver resection and cardiac surgery) while in Child A and MELD <10 surgery is well tolerated. VOCAL-Penn score is a new promising tool and can be the better alternative of CTP, MELD, and Mayo risk score models but more prospective studies with large patients\' population are warranted. Certain surgeries like Hepatic resection, intraabdominal, and cardiothoracic have higher risk than abdominal wall hernia repair and orthopedic surgery. Laparoscopic approaches have better outcomes and less risk of liver failure than open surgery. Minimally invasive alternatives like colonic stent placement in case of obstruction can be considered in high-risk cases. Perioperative optimization and management of ascites, HE, bleeding, liver decompensation, and nutrition should be done with multidisciplinary approach. Patients with cirrhosis undergoing high risk elective surgery can develop liver failure in post-operative period and should be evaluated and counseled for liver transplantation if not contraindicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自噬是允许通过溶酶体降解有害成分以在可变刺激下维持细胞稳态的过程。SQSTM1是参与功能性自噬的关键分子,与不同的信号通路相关。氧化反应,和炎症。自噬的失调被报道在广谱的疾病中。SQSTM1的积累反映了自噬受损,这与各种肿瘤的发生和进展有关,包括肝细胞癌(HCC)。这项研究调查了SQSTM1蛋白在HCC中的表达及其与临床病理特征的关系以及射频消融(RFA)后肿瘤复发的可能性。
    这项研究包括50例巴塞罗那诊所肝癌0/A-B期肝硬化HCC患者,符合RFA条件。就在局部消融之前获得肿瘤和肿瘤周围活检,并通过免疫组织化学评估肿瘤病理分级和SQSTM1表达。患者在完全消融后随访一年以检测任何肿瘤复发。
    血清甲胎蛋白水平(U=149.50,P=0.027*)和肿瘤病理分级(χ2=12.702,P=0.002*)与肿瘤对RFA的反应显着相关。SQSTM1表达水平显着增加,在肝癌与癌旁肝硬化肝组织相比(Z=5.927,P<0.001*)。SQSTM1在HCC中的表达水平与肿瘤的病理分级之间存在显着直接关系(H=33.789,P<0.001*)。关于后续行动,肿瘤和瘤周SQSTM1表达水平显着作为总生存率的潜在预测指标,但不是疾病复发。
    SQSTM1表达可以决定侵袭性肝癌,即使肿瘤大小和数量合理,并确定总生存期短和预后不良的HCC患者亚群。SQSTM1表达不能预测RFA后肝内HCC复发。SQSTM1可能是选择HCC患者进行未来治疗的潜在生物标志物和靶标。
    UNASSIGNED: Autophagy is a process that allows the degradation of detrimental components through the lysosome to maintain cellular homeostasis under variable stimuli. SQSTM1 is a key molecule involved in functional autophagy and is linked to different signaling pathways, oxidative responses, and inflammation. Dysregulation of autophagy is reported in a broad spectrum of diseases. Accumulation of SQSTM1 reflects impaired autophagy, which is related to carcinogenesis and progression of various tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study investigated SQSTM1 protein expression in HCC and its relation to the clinicopathological features and the likelihood of tumor recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 50 patients with cirrhotic HCC of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages 0/A-B eligible for RFA. Tumor and peritumor biopsies were obtained just prior to local ablation and assessed for tumor pathological grade and SQSTM1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Patients were followed for one year after achieving complete ablation to detect any tumor recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: Serum alpha-fetoprotein level (U = 149.50, P = 0.027∗) and pathological grade of the tumor (χ2 = 12.702, P = 0.002∗) associated significantly with the tumor response to RFA. SQSTM1 expression level was significantly increased in HCC compared to the adjacent peritumor cirrhotic liver tissues (Z = 5.927, P < 0.001∗). Significant direct relation was found between SQSTM1 expression level in HCC and the pathological grade of the tumor (H = 33.789, P < 0.001∗). On follow-up, tumor and peritumor SQSTM1 expression levels performed significantly as a potential predictor of the overall survival, but not the disease recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: SQSTM1 expression could determine aggressive HCC, even with reasonable tumor size and number, and identify the subset of HCC patients with short overall survival and unfavorable prognosis. SQSTM1 expression could not predict post-RFA intrahepatic HCC recurrence. SQSTM1 may be a potential biomarker and target for the selection of HCC patients for future therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:没有“金标准”工具来评估肝硬化的虚弱。这项研究比较了肝脏衰弱指数(LFI),短物理性能电池(SPPB),油炸脆弱标准(FFC),和临床虚弱量表(CFS)用于虚弱评估,并确定其对预测肝硬化门诊患者队列死亡率和住院率的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:116例患者纳入这项前瞻性观察性队列研究。使用LFI进行虚弱评估,SPPB,FFC,和CFS。所有患者均随访6个月。主要结果是在研究期间的6个月内发生的全因计划外住院或全因死亡的第一个结果。
    UNASSIGNED:100名(86.2%)男性和16名(13.8%)女性,平均年龄为50.2(48.4-51.9,95%CI)岁。肝硬化最常见的原因是酒精性肝病(47.4%),其次是丙型肝炎(12.9%)和非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)(10.3%)。基于LFI的虚弱患病率没有显着差异(43.1%),FFC(36.2%),CFS(44%),SPPB(47.4%)(P>0.05)。与不虚弱组相比,虚弱患者的预后较差。6个月时,虚弱患者的死亡率为42%,不虚弱患者的死亡率为1.5%;虚弱患者的住院率为92%,不虚弱患者的住院率为6%.在多变量分析中,死亡率的独立预测因子是虚弱[OR14(1.4-54.2)],酒精相关性肝硬化[OR4.2(1.1-16.3)],Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)[OR2.1(1.4-2.9)]和慢性肝病问卷(CLDQ)[OR0.1(0.1-0.4)]得分。
    未经评估:LFI,SPPB,FFC,和CFS在肝硬化患者的虚弱评估中具有可比性。重要的是,用于衰弱评估和预测住院和死亡率的常用评分的可比性为临床应用提供了灵活性.
    UNASSIGNED: There is no \"gold standard\" tool for the assessment of frailty in cirrhosis. This study compares Liver Frailty Index (LFI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Fried Frailty Criteria (FFC), and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for frailty assessment and ascertains its impact on predicting mortality and hospitalizations in a cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis.
    UNASSIGNED: 116 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Frailty assessment was done using LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The primary outcome was the first of either all-cause unplanned hospitalization or all-cause mortality occurring within 6 months of the study period.
    UNASSIGNED: 100 (86.2%) males and 16 (13.8%) females with a mean age of 50.2 (48.4-51.9, 95% CI) years were included. The most common cause of cirrhosis was alcoholic liver disease (47.4%) followed by hepatitis C (12.9%) and Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (10.3%). There was no significant difference in prevalence of frailty based on LFI (43.1%), FFC (36.2%), CFS (44%), and SPPB (47.4%) (P > 0.05). Frail patients had worse outcomes compared to the Not frail group. At 6 months, the mortality rate in Frail patients was 42% versus 1.5% for the Not frail; hospitalization in Frail patients occurred in 92% versus 6% in the Not frail. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of mortality were Frailty [OR 14 (1.4-54.2)], alcohol-related cirrhosis [OR 4.2 (1.1-16.3)], Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) [OR 2.1 (1.4-2.9)] and Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) [OR 0.1 (0.1-0.4)] scores.
    UNASSIGNED: LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS are comparable in frailty assessment in patients with cirrhosis. Importantly, comparability of the commonly used scores for frailty assessment and prediction of hospitalization and mortality allows flexibility for clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    低钠血症是肝移植(LT)等待名单上失代偿期肝硬化患者中最常见的电解质异常。这些患者中的大多数患有继发于内脏血管舒张的稀释性或高容量性低钠血症。抗利尿激素的过度分泌也起着重要作用。高容量性低钠血症通常与顽固性腹水有关,自发性细菌性腹膜炎,和肝性脑病.虽然不常见,利尿剂和泻药的使用可引起低血容量低钠血症,其特征是明显没有腹水或踏板水肿。临床特征通常是非特异性的,取决于发作的敏锐度,而不是血清钠的绝对值。症状可能很微妙,包括恶心,嗜睡,弱点,或者厌食症.然而,很少有患者可能出现混乱,癫痫发作,精神病,或者昏迷.治疗包括停用利尿剂,β受体阻滞剂,和白蛋白输注。高渗盐水(3%)输注可用于血清钠非常低(<110mmol/L)的患者或出现癫痫发作或昏迷的患者。短期使用血管加压素(V2)受体拮抗剂也可用于在LT之前使钠水平正常化。然而,所有这些措施都可能是徒劳的,LT仍然是这些患者的明确治疗方法,以提高生存率。在这次审查中,我们描述了分类,低钠血症的发病机制,及其在肝硬化患者中的临床意义。还将简要讨论这些患者的治疗方法。
    Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis on Liver Transplantation (LT) waiting list. Most of these patients have dilutional or hypervolemic hyponatremia secondary to splanchnic vasodilatation. Excessive secretion of the antidiuretic hormone also plays an important role. Hypervolemic hyponatremia is commonly associated with refractory ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatic encephalopathy. Although uncommon, the use of diuretics and laxatives can cause hypovolemic hyponatremia that is characterized by the striking absence of ascites or pedal edema. Clinical features are often nonspecific and depend on the acuity of onset rather than the absolute value of serum sodium. Symptoms may be subtle, including nausea, lethargy, weakness, or anorexia. However, rarely patients may present with confusion, seizures, psychosis, or coma. Treatment includes discontinuation of diuretics, beta-blockers, and albumin infusion. Hypertonic saline (3%) infusion may be used in patients with very low serum sodium (<110 mmol/L) or when patients present with seizures or coma. Short-term use of Vasopressin (V2) receptor antagonists may also be used to normalize sodium levels prior to LT. However, all these measures may be futile, and LT remains the definite treatment in these patients to improve survival. In this review, we describe the classification, pathogenesis of hyponatremia, and its clinical implications in patients with cirrhosis. Approach to these patients along with management will also be discussed briefly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:肝硬化患者的结核病(TB)的诊断和治疗仍然具有挑战性。我们研究了临床谱,诊断,和结核病的管理以及对该队列中各种实验室研究的诊断效用的评估。
    UNASSIGNED:对肝硬化患者的记录进行了回顾性审查(2017年7月和2019年12月)。在30例肝硬化和结核病患者中,将20例胸膜/腹膜TB患者(病例)与20例连续选择的自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)对照进行比较。复合临床,实验室,以放射学特征和抗结核治疗(ATT)反应作为诊断结核病的金标准.
    未经证实:肺外结核(EPTB)(n=23,76.7%)更为常见。总的来说,9(30%)患者出现ATT诱导的肝炎。与SBP组相比,胸膜/腹膜结核患者的肝功能不全严重程度较低,CTP明显降低[8±1.5vs.9±1.7(P=0.01)],MELD[16.3±5.8vs.20.2±6.6(P=0.02)]和MELD-Na[18.8±5.9vs.22.5±7.1(P=0.03)]评分。腹水/胸膜液总蛋白中位数[2.7(2.4-3.1)vs.1.1(0.9-1.2);P<0.0001]和腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)水平[34.5(30.3-42.7)vs.15(13-16);P<0.0001]在TB组显著增高。总蛋白水平的敏感性和特异性分别为81%和93.3%,分别,在>2g/dl的截止值,AUROC为0.89[(0.79-0.96);P<0.001],而在>26IU/L的截止值的ADA水平在诊断胸膜/腹膜结核时显示出80%的敏感性和90%的特异性,AUROC为0.93[(0.82-0.97);P<0.001]。只有11人(36.7%),8例(26.6%)患者在GeneXpert和mTB-PCR中显示阳性,分别。Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分≤7和8-10的患者对两种和一种肝毒性药物的耐受性良好,分别。
    UNASSIGNED:EPTB在肝硬化患者中更常见。相对较低的腹水/胸膜液总蛋白和ADA的截止值可能有助于诊断具有高预测试概率的患者的EPTB。具有密切监测和动态修改的个性化ATT是有效且耐受性良好的。
    UNASSIGNED: Diagnosis and management of tuberculosis (TB) in patients with cirrhosis remains challenging. We studied the clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and management of TB along with the assessment of the diagnostic utility of various laboratory investigations in this cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of records of patients with cirrhosis (July 2017 and December 2019) was done. Out of 30 patients with cirrhosis and TB, 20 patients with pleural/peritoneal TB (cases) were compared with 20 consecutively selected spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) controls. Composite of clinical, laboratory, radiologic features and response to antituberculosis therapy (ATT) was taken as the gold standard to diagnose TB.
    UNASSIGNED: Extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) (n = 23, 76.7%) was more common. Overall, 9 (30%) patients presented with ATT-induced hepatitis. Patients with pleural/peritoneal TB had less severe hepatic dysfunction as compared to SBP group with significantly lower CTP [8 ± 1.5 vs. 9 ± 1.7 (P = 0.01)], MELD [16.3 ± 5.8 vs. 20.2 ± 6.6 (P = 0.02)] and MELD-Na [18.8 ± 5.9 vs. 22.5 ± 7.1 (P = 0.03)] scores. Median ascitic/pleural fluid total protein [2.7 (2.4-3.1) vs. 1.1 (0.9-1.2); P < 0.0001] and adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels [34.5 (30.3-42.7) vs. 15 (13-16); P < 0.0001] were significantly higher in the TB group. Total protein levels had a sensitivity and specificity 81% and 93.3%, respectively, at cut off value of >2 g/dl with an AUROC of 0.89 [(0.79-0.96); P < 0.001] whereas ADA levels at cutoff >26 IU/L showed 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity to diagnose pleural/peritoneal TB with an AUROC of 0.93 [(0.82-0.97); P < 0.001]. Only 11 (36.7%), and 8 (26.6%) patients showed positivity on GeneXpert and mTB-PCR, respectively. Patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores of ≤7 and 8-10 tolerated well two and one hepatotoxic drugs, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: EPTB is more frequent in patients with cirrhosis. Relatively lower cutoffs of ascitic/pleural fluid total protein and ADA may be useful to diagnose EPTB in patients with high pretest probability. Individualized ATT with close monitoring and dynamic modifications is effective and well-tolerated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)预示着肝硬化死亡率增加,强制预防策略。诺氟沙星是SBP预防的推荐选择。然而,它的使用引起了人们对抗生素耐药性的担忧。利福昔明已被建议作为替代品。我们研究了利福昔明对诺氟沙星在SBP的一级和二级预防中的疗效。
    未经评估:在这项开放标记的随机试验中,患有腹液蛋白水平(<1.5g/l)的晚期肝硬化患者,Child-Pugh评分≥9分,血清胆红素≥3mg/dl或肾功能受损(初级预防组),或先前有SBP的患者(二级预防组)接受诺氟沙星(每天一次400mg)或利福昔明(每天两次550mg)。所有患者随访6个月,主要终点是事件SBP的发展。
    未经评估:对142名患者进行了资格评估,其中132人符合入学标准;12人失去随访,而4人停止治疗。在初级预防的患者中,SBP的发生率相似(14.3%vs.24.3%,P=0.5),而在二级预防中,利福昔明的SBP复发率较低(7%vs.39%P=0.004)。利福昔明显著降低二级预防中发生SBP的几率[OR(95%CI0.14(0.02-0.73;P=0.02)]。接受利福昔明作为二级预防的患者的肝性脑病发作也较少(23.1%vs.51.5%,P=0.02)。两组的180天生存率相似(P=0.5,P=0.2)。
    未经评估:与诺氟沙星相比,利福昔明显着减少了SBP的事件,以及用作二级预防的HE,而对于初级预防,两者具有相似的效果(NCT03695705)。
    UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT03695705。
    UNASSIGNED: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) heralds increased mortality in cirrhosis, mandating strategies for prophylaxis. Norfloxacin has been the recommended choice for SBP prevention. However, its use has raised concerns about antibiotic resistance. Rifaximin has been suggested as an alternative. We investigated the efficacy of rifaximin against norfloxacin in primary and secondary prophylaxis of SBP.
    UNASSIGNED: In this open-labeled randomized trial, patients with either advanced cirrhosis having ascitic fluid protein levels (<1.5 g/l), Child-Pugh score ≥9 points, serum bilirubin ≥3 mg/dl or impaired renal function (primary prophylaxis group), or those with prior SBP (secondary prophylaxis group) received either norfloxacin (400 mg once daily) or rifaximin (550 mg twice daily). All patients were followed for six months, with the primary endpoint being the development of incident SBP.
    UNASSIGNED: 142 patients were assessed for eligibility, of which 132 met the enrolment criteria; 12 were lost to follow-up, while 4 discontinued treatment. In patients on primary prophylaxis, occurrence of SBP was similar (14.3% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.5), whereas in secondary prophylaxis SBP recurrence was lower with rifaximin (7% vs. 39% P = 0.004). Rifaximin significantly reduced the odds for SBP development in secondary prophylaxis [OR (95% CI0.14 (0.02-0.73; P = 0.02)]. Patients receiving rifaximin as secondary prophylaxis also had fewer episodes of hepatic encephalopathy (23.1% vs. 51.5%, P = 0.02). 180-day survival between the arms in either group was similar (P = 0.5, P = 0.2).
    UNASSIGNED: In comparison to norfloxacin, rifaximin significantly reduces incident events of SBP, as well as HE when used as a secondary prophylaxis, whereas for primary prophylaxis both have similar effects (NCT03695705).
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03695705.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性肝病(CLD)是许多国家残疾调整寿命的主要原因之一。最近对核胆汁酸受体途径的理解越来越关注肠道之间串扰的影响,胆汁酸,和肝脏对肝脏病理的影响。虽然通常用于胆汁淤积症和溶解胆结石,胆汁酸对肠道微生物组和人体代谢的影响的发现为其在早期和晚期肝病中的应用提供了独特的潜力,因为其病因多样。基于这些发现,使用基于胆汁酸的分子的临床前研究在解决肝脏炎症和纤维化方面显示出令人鼓舞的结果。新出现的数据还表明,胆汁酸谱在肝病的各种原因中具有明显的变化。我们总结了与胆汁酸在健康和疾病相关的当前知识和证据,并讨论了胆汁酸衍生物在CLD中的最终和正在进行的治疗试验。在不久的将来,这方面的进一步证据可能有助于临床医生更好地发现和管理肝脏疾病.
    Chronic liver disease (CLD) is one of the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years in many countries. A recent understanding of nuclear bile acid receptor pathways has increased focus on the impact of crosstalk between the gut, bile acids, and liver on liver pathology. While conventionally used in cholestatic disorders and to dissolve gallstones, the discovery of bile acids\' influence on the gut microbiome and human metabolism offers a unique potential for their utility in early and advanced liver diseases because of diverse etiologies. Based on these findings, preclinical studies using bile acid-based molecules have shown encouraging results at addressing liver inflammation and fibrosis. Emerging data also suggest that bile acid profiles change distinctively across various causes of liver disease. We summarize the current knowledge and evidence related to bile acids in health and disease and discuss culminated and ongoing therapeutic trials of bile acid derivatives in CLD. In the near future, further evidence in this area might help clinicians better detect and manage liver diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:存在多种肌少症的定义,缺乏最佳预测结果的可接受标准。我们根据四个标准估计了肌肉减少症的患病率,并评估了它们在预测肝硬化患者死亡率方面的效用。
    方法:在一项前瞻性观察研究中,连续的亚洲肝硬化患者在第三腰椎接受了计算机体层摄影术的握力(HGS)和骨骼肌指数(SMI)评估。肌肉减少症的定义基于西方截止值(WC;男性SMI<50cm2/m2,女性<39cm2/m2),亚洲截止值(AC;男性SMI<36.5cm2/m2,女性为30.2cm2/m2),欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组第2次会议(EWGSOP2)定义,纳入低HGS(男性<27公斤,女性<16公斤)和低SMI(由WC定义),和EWGSOP2定义具有低HGS和低SMI(由AC定义)。使用多变量Cox比例风险评估死亡的危险因素。
    结果:我们纳入了219例肝硬化患者(168名男性;平均年龄42.6岁),其中50.2%患者代偿失调。酒精是最常见的病因(33.3%)。WC中肌肉减少症的患病率最高(男性:82.1%;女性:62.7%)。所有标准之间的一致性较弱(Fleiss\'kappa0.23,95%置信区间[CI]0.10-0.37)。总的来说,在12(6-15)个月的中位(四分位距)随访中,12个月的生存率为86.1%(81.1-91.3%)。腹水(危险比[HR]6.27[95%CI1.6-24.1];P<0.007)和SMI(HR0.92[0.85-0.98];P=0.021)是死亡率的独立预测因子。肌少症患者12个月死亡率较高,与标准无关(对数秩P<0.05)。低HGS和低SMI(由AC定义)是预测死亡率的最佳方法(HR3.04[1.43-6.43];P=0.004)。
    结论:肌少症的各种诊断定义之间存在弱一致性。通过低HGS和特定人群SMI截止值(AC)的组合诊断出的肌肉减少症最好地预测了死亡率。
    OBJECTIVE: Multiple definitions of sarcopenia exist and the acceptable criterion that best predicts outcome is lacking. We estimated the prevalence of sarcopenia based on four criteria and assessed their utility in predicting mortality in cirrhotics.
    METHODS: In a prospective observational study, consecutive Asian patients with cirrhosis underwent testing for handgrip strength (HGS) and estimation of skeletal muscle index (SMI) using computed tomography at the third lumbar vertebra. Sarcopenia was defined based on the Western cut-off (WC; SMI < 50 cm2/m2 for men and <39 cm2/m2 for women), Asian cut-off (AC; SMI < 36.5 cm2/m2 for men and 30.2 cm2/m2 for women), European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People-2nd meeting (EWGSOP2) definition incorporating low HGS (<27 kg for men and <16 kg for women) with low SMI (defined by the WC), and EWGSOP2 definition with low HGS and low SMI (defined by AC). Risk factors for mortality were assessed using multivariate Cox-proportional hazards.
    RESULTS: We included 219 patients with cirrhosis (168 men; mean age 42.6 years) with 50.2% patients having decompensation. Alcohol was the commonest aetiology (33.3%). The prevalence of sarcopenia was highest with the WC (men: 82.1%; women: 62.7%). There was a weak concordance among all criteria (Fleiss\' kappa 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.37). Overall, 12-month survival was 86.1% (81.1-91.3%) over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 12 (6-15) months. Ascites (hazards ratio [HR] 6.27 [95% CI 1.6-24.1]; P < 0.007) and SMI (HR 0.92 [0.85-0.98]; P = 0.021) were independent predictors of mortality. The 12-month mortality rate was higher in patients with sarcopenia, irrespective of criteria (log rank P < 0.05). Low HGS and low SMI (defined by AC) was the best for predicting mortality (HR 3.04 [1.43-6.43]; P = 0.004).
    CONCLUSIONS: A weak concordance exists amongst various diagnostic definitions of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia diagnosed by a combination of low HGS and population-specific SMI cut-off (AC) best predicts mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年肝硬化和冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的住院死亡率很高。关于住院后肝硬化患者预后的信息有限。
    我们的目的是研究COVID-19肝硬化患者出院后的转归。
    回顾了COVID-19后出院的肝硬化患者的记录。将他们的数据与相似数量的无COVID-19的肝硬化患者进行年龄倾向评分匹配后进行比较,性别,肝硬化的病因,和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分。
    患有(n=92)或不患有(n=92)COVID-19的肝硬化患者的比例为1:1。COVID-19(22;23.9%)和非COVID-19(19;20.7%)的死亡率相当(HR1.224;95%CI0.663-2.263,P=0.520),在相似的随访时间[186(86-271)vs183(103-274)]。在COVID-19患者中,45;48.9%发展了新的急性失代偿增加的腹水(40;43.5%),肝性脑病(20;21.7%),或静脉曲张出血(8;8.7%),而25(27.2%)患者需要再次住院。一部分参与者继续有疲劳/虚弱(24/80;30.0%),睡眠障碍(11/80;13.7%),或关节痛(16/80;20.0%)。两组患者最常见的死亡原因是终末期肝病:16(72.7%)vs9(47.4%),其次是多器官功能障碍:4(18.2%)vs6(31.6%),消化道出血:2(9.1%)与4(21.0%),P=0.484。较低的白蛋白水平,较高的国际标准化比率,胆红素,Child-Turcotte-Pugh,出院时MELD评分预测COVID-19组的死亡率。
    在最初的COVID-19损伤中幸存下来的肝硬化患者的短期预后与没有COVID-19的患者没有什么不同,生存率取决于出院时肝病的严重程度。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with cirrhosis and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) have high in-hospital mortality. The information on outcome of cirrhosis patients in post-hospitalization period are limited.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to study the outcome of cirrhosis patients with COVID-19 after hospital discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: The records of the cirrhosis patients discharged after COVID-19 were reviewed. Their data were compared with a similar number of cirrhosis patients without COVID-19 after propensity score matching for age, sex, etiology of cirrhosis, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score.
    UNASSIGNED: Cirrhosis patients with (n=92) or without (n=92) COVID-19 were included in 1:1 ratio. The mortality among COVID-19 (22; 23.9%) and non-COVID-19 (19; 20.7%) were comparable (HR 1.224; 95% CI 0.663-2.263, P=0.520), over a similar duration of follow-up [186 (86-271) vs 183 (103-274)]. Among COVID-19 patients, 45; 48.9% developed a new acute decompensation-increased ascites (40; 43.5%), hepatic encephalopathy (20; 21.7%), or variceal bleeding (8; 8.7%) whereas 25 (27.2%) patients needed re-hospitalization. A proportion of participants continued to have either fatigue/weakness (24/80; 30.0%), sleep disturbances (11/80; 13.7%), or joint pains (16/80; 20.0%). The most common causes of death in patients of both groups were end-stage liver disease: 16 (72.7%) vs 9 (47.4%), followed by multiorgan dysfunction: 4 (18.2%) vs 6 (31.6%), GI bleeding: 2 (9.1%) vs. 4 (21.0%), P=0.484. A lower albumin level, higher international normalized ratio, bilirubin, Child-Turcotte-Pugh, and MELD scores at discharge predicted mortality in the COVID-19 group.
    UNASSIGNED: Short-term outcomes of patients with cirrhosis who survive the initial insult of COVID-19 are not different from patients without COVID-19, and survival is determined by the severity of liver disease at discharge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号