CR, Complete response

CR,完整响应
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:我们阐明了阿特珠单抗和贝伐单抗(Ate/Bev)治疗的不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)患者血清IL-6水平的临床和免疫学意义。
    UNASSIGNED:我们前瞻性招募了165例不可切除的HCC患者(发现队列:来自三个中心的84例患者;验证队列:来自一个中心的81例患者)。使用流式细胞术珠子阵列分析基线血液样品。使用RNA测序分析肿瘤免疫微环境。
    UNASSIGNED:在发现队列中,临床获益6个月(CB6m)定义为完全或部分缓解,或病情稳定≥6个月。在各种基于血液的生物标志物中,无CB6m的参与者的血清IL-6水平显着高于有CB6m的参与者(平均11.56vs.5.05pg/ml,p=0.02)。使用最大程度地选择排名统计信息,高IL-6的最佳临界值确定为18.49pg/ml,15.2%的参与者在基线时发现IL-6水平较高.在发现和验证队列中,与基线IL-6水平较低的参与者相比,基线IL-6水平较高的参与者在Ate/Bev治疗后的缓解率降低,无进展生存期和总生存期较差.在多变量Cox回归分析中,高IL-6水平的临床意义持续存在,即使在调整了各种混杂因素之后。IL-6水平高的参与者显示CD8T细胞分泌的干扰素-γ和肿瘤坏死因子-α减少。此外,过量的IL-6抑制细胞因子的产生和CD8+T细胞的增殖。最后,IL-6水平高的参与者表现出非T细胞炎症的免疫抑制肿瘤微环境.
    UASSIGNED:在Ate/Bev治疗后,高基线IL-6水平可能与不良临床结局和T细胞功能受损相关。
    UNASSIGNED:尽管对阿特珠单抗和贝伐单抗治疗有反应的肝细胞癌患者表现出良好的临床结局,其中一小部分仍然存在主要阻力。我们发现,在接受阿特珠单抗和贝伐单抗治疗的肝细胞癌患者中,高基线血清IL-6水平与不良临床结果和T细胞反应受损相关。
    UNASSIGNED: We elucidated the clinical and immunologic implications of serum IL-6 levels in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Ate/Bev).
    UNASSIGNED: We prospectively enrolled 165 patients with unresectable HCC (discovery cohort: 84 patients from three centres; validation cohort: 81 patients from one centre). Baseline blood samples were analysed using a flow cytometric bead array. The tumour immune microenvironment was analysed using RNA sequencing.
    UNASSIGNED: In the discovery cohort, clinical benefit 6 months (CB6m) was defined as complete or partial response, or stable disease for ≥6 months. Among various blood-based biomarkers, serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in participants without CB6m than in those with CB6m (mean 11.56 vs. 5.05 pg/ml, p = 0.02). Using maximally selected rank statistics, the optimal cut-off value for high IL-6 was determined as 18.49 pg/ml, and 15.2% of participants were found to have high IL-6 levels at baseline. In both the discovery and validation cohorts, participants with high baseline IL-6 levels had a reduced response rate and worse progression-free and overall survival after Ate/Bev treatment compared with those with low baseline IL-6 levels. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the clinical implications of high IL-6 levels persisted, even after adjusting for various confounding factors. Participants with high IL-6 levels showed reduced interferon-γ and tumour necrosis factor-α secretion from CD8+ T cells. Moreover, excess IL-6 suppressed cytokine production and proliferation of CD8+ T cells. Finally, participants with high IL-6 levels exhibited a non-T-cell-inflamed immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment.
    UNASSIGNED: High baseline IL-6 levels can be associated with poor clinical outcomes and impaired T-cell function in patients with unresectable HCC after Ate/Bev treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Although patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who respond to treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab exhibit favourable clinical outcomes, a fraction of these still experience primary resistance. We found that high baseline serum levels of IL-6 correlate with poor clinical outcomes and impaired T-cell response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血栓形成是复发性自然流产(RSA)的重要缘由。血栓性疾病的治疗有利于RSA的预防。因此,我们探讨了补血中药的临床疗效,补肾镇静治疗RSA合并血栓形成倾向。回顾性分析190例RSA合并血栓性疾病患者采用不同治疗方法的临床转归。中药组采用补肾法治疗,活血疏胎中药和西药组用低分子肝素(LMWH)治疗,中药联合西药组用LMWH加中药补肾,血液激活和胎儿稳定。治疗后,血小板聚集率,与单纯中药和LMWH组相比,LMWH组的血浆D-二聚体和子宫动脉血流阻力显着降低(P<0.0167)。与其他组相比,LMWH加中药组明显加快了胎儿芽的生长(P<0.0167)。此外,LMWH加中药组改善中医证候积分(P<0.0167),显现出较好的临床疗效。在治疗期间,LMWH组中有5例患者发生了不良反应,但在简单草药和LMWH加草药组中没有发生不良反应。因此,我们的研究表明,对于RSA合并血栓形成的治疗,中草药加LMWH可以改善怀孕期间子宫的血液供应,并为胎儿的生长提供有利的环境。中药具有良好的疗效,不良反应少。
    Thrombophilia is an important cause of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). The treatment of thrombophilia is beneficial to the prevention of RSA. Therefore, we explored the clinical effect of Chinese traditional herbs with the effects of invigorating the blood, tonifying the kidney and calming the fetus in the treatment of RSA complicated with thrombophilia. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 190 RSA patients combined with thrombophilia using different treatment methods. The traditional Chinese medicine group was treated with kidney-invigorating, blood-activating and fetus-soothing herbs and the western medicine group was treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and the traditional Chinese medicine combined with western medicine group was treated with LMWH plus Chinese traditional herbs with the effects of kidney tonifying, blood activating and fetus stabilizing. After treatments, platelet aggregation rate, plasma D-dimer and uterine artery blood flow resistance were significantly reduced in the LMWH plus herbs compared to the simple herbs and LMWH group (P < 0.0167). The LMWH plus herbs group significantly accelerated the growth of fetal bud compared with other groups (P < 0.0167). Moreover, the LMWH plus herbs group improved traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores (P < 0.0167), showing a better clinical efficacy. Adverse reactions occurred in five patients in the LMWH group but not in the simple herbs and LMWH plus herbs group during the treatment period. Therefore, our study shows that for the treatment of RSA complicated with thrombophilia, Chinese traditional herbs plus LMWH can improve the blood supply of the uterus during pregnancy and contribute to a favorable environment for the growth of the fetus. Chinese traditional herbs exert a good curative effect with few adverse reactions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:我们研究了免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)再激发在先前的全身性治疗中接受基于ICI治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效和安全性。
    未经评估:在这个国际上,回顾性多中心研究,在14个机构接受至少两行基于ICI的治疗(ICI-1,ICI-2)的HCC患者符合资格.主要结果包括最佳总体反应和治疗相关不良事件。
    未经证实:在994名接受ICI治疗的患者中,共有58名患者(男性,n=41;71%),平均年龄为65.0±9.0岁。ICI-1和ICI-2的系统治疗线中位数为1(范围,1-4)和3(范围,2-9),分别。ICI-1和ICI-2使用的基于ICI的治疗包括单独的ICI(ICI-1,n=26,45%;ICI-2,n=4,7%),双重ICI方案(n=1,2%;n=12,21%),或ICI联合靶向治疗/抗VEGF(n=31,53%;n=42,72%)。大多数患者因进展而停用ICI-1(n=52,90%)。ICI-1的客观反应率为22%,ICI-2的客观反应率为26%。在患有进行性疾病的患者中,ICI-2的反应也是ICI-1的最佳总体反应(n=11/21;52%)。ICI-1和ICI-2的中位进展时间分别为5.4(95%CI3.0-7.7)个月和5.2(95%CI3.3-7.0)个月,分别。在9例(16%)和10例(17%)患者中观察到ICI-1和ICI-2的治疗相关不良事件为3-4级,分别。
    UNASSIGNED:ICI再激发是安全的,并且在相当比例的HCC患者中获得了治疗益处。这些数据为在前瞻性试验中一线免疫治疗进展的患者中研究基于ICI的方案提供了理论基础。
    UNASSIGNED:基于一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)治疗后的治疗测序仍然是一个挑战,因为在免疫治疗预处理患者中没有研究可用的二线治疗方案。特别是,ICI再激发在HCC患者中的作用尚不清楚,由于缺乏前瞻性试验的数据.我们调查了ICI为基础的方案的疗效和安全性在肝癌患者的免疫治疗前,国际,多中心研究。我们的数据为研究基于ICI的治疗方案在一线免疫治疗进展患者中的作用的前瞻性试验提供了理论基础。
    UNASSIGNED: We investigated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICI-based therapies in a previous systemic line.
    UNASSIGNED: In this international, retrospective multicenter study, patients with HCC who received at least two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1, ICI-2) at 14 institutions were eligible. The main outcomes included best overall response and treatment-related adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 994 ICI-treated patients screened, a total of 58 patients (male, n = 41; 71%) with a mean age of 65.0±9.0 years were included. Median systemic treatment lines of ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 1 (range, 1-4) and 3 (range, 2-9), respectively. ICI-based therapies used at ICI-1 and ICI-2 included ICI alone (ICI-1, n = 26, 45%; ICI-2, n = 4, 7%), dual ICI regimens (n = 1, 2%; n = 12, 21%), or ICI combined with targeted therapies/anti-VEGF (n = 31, 53%; n = 42, 72%). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 due to progression (n = 52, 90%). Objective response rate was 22% at ICI-1 and 26% at ICI-2. Responses at ICI-2 were also seen in patients who had progressive disease as best overall response at ICI-1 (n = 11/21; 52%). Median time-to-progression at ICI-1 and ICI-2 was 5.4 (95% CI 3.0-7.7) months and 5.2 (95% CI 3.3-7.0) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were observed in 9 (16%) and 10 (17%) patients, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: ICI rechallenge was safe and resulted in a treatment benefit in a meaningful proportion of patients with HCC. These data provide a rationale for investigating ICI-based regimens in patients who progressed on first-line immunotherapy in prospective trials.
    UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic sequencing after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge as no available second-line treatment options have been studied in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. Particularly, the role of ICI rechallenge in patients with HCC is unclear, as data from prospective trials are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based regimens in patients with HCC pretreated with immunotherapy in a retrospective, international, multicenter study. Our data provide the rationale for prospective trials investigating the role of ICI-based regimens in patients who have progressed on first-line immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    淀粉样蛋白轻链(AL)淀粉样变性是一种罕见的,衰弱,往往是致命的疾病。心肌病的症状是常见的表现特征,患者经常被转诊给心脏病专家。心脏淀粉样蛋白浸润是死亡的主要预测因子。然而,该疾病的可变表现和感知的稀有性经常导致延迟怀疑淀粉样变性是心力衰竭的原因,导致误诊和诊断明显延迟,给病人带来毁灭性的后果。当AL淀粉样变性和心肌病患者的诊断中位生存期为4个月至2年时,从症状发作到正确诊断的中位时间约2年通常太长。作者强调了诊断的挑战,找出当前知识中的差距,并总结了新的治疗方法,以提高人们对早期识别AL淀粉样变性症状和诊断的迫切需要的认识,旨在加速治疗和改善患者预后。
    Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare, debilitating, often fatal disease. Symptoms of cardiomyopathy are common presenting features, and patients often are referred to cardiologists. Cardiac amyloid infiltration is the leading predictor of death. However, the variable presentation and perceived rarity of the disease frequently lead to delay in suspecting amyloidosis as a cause of heart failure, leading to misdiagnoses and a marked delay in diagnosis, with devastating consequences for the patient. A median time from symptom onset to correct diagnosis of about 2 years is often too long when median survival from diagnosis for patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiomyopathy is 4 months to 2 years. The authors highlight the challenges to diagnosis, identify gaps in the current knowledge, and summarize novel treatments on the horizon to raise awareness about the critical need for early recognition of symptoms and diagnosis of AL amyloidosis aimed at accelerating treatment and improving outcomes for patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:患有淀粉样蛋白轻链淀粉样变性和严重心脏功能障碍的患者预后不良。诱导快速和深层血液学和器官反应的治疗选择,不管心脏是否受累,是需要的。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究的目的是评估基线心脏分期对3期ANDROMEDA试验疗效和安全性结果的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:比较了6个月时的总体完全血液学反应率和心脏和肾脏反应率以及中位主要器官恶化-无进展生存期和主要器官恶化-无事件生存期(I,II,或IIIA)和治疗(达雷妥单抗,硼替佐米,环磷酰胺,和地塞米松[D-VCd]或硼替佐米,环磷酰胺,和地塞米松[VCd])。总结了有和没有基线心脏受累的患者的不良事件(AE)率以及心脏分期。
    UNASSIGNED:中位随访时间为15.7个月。第一阶段的比例,II,IIIA患者为23.2%,40.2%,和36.6%。在整个心脏阶段,与VCd相比,D-VCd的血液学和器官反应率更高,主要器官恶化-无进展生存期和主要器官恶化-无事件生存期更长。治疗之间和心脏分期之间的AE发生率相似;心脏受累患者的严重AE发生率更高,并且随着心脏分期的增加而增加。D-VCd与VCd相比,心脏事件的发生率在数值上更高,但3级或4级事件的发生率相似.D-VCd的心脏事件暴露调整发生率低于VCd(中位暴露13.4和5.3个月,分别)。
    UNASSIGNED:这些发现证明了D-VCd对新诊断的跨心脏阶段淀粉样蛋白轻链淀粉样变性患者的疗效。因此支持其在心脏受累患者中的使用。(NCT03201965)。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with amyloid light chain amyloidosis and severe cardiac dysfunction have a poor prognosis. Treatment options that induce rapid and deep hematologic and organ responses, irrespective of cardiac involvement, are needed.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of baseline cardiac stage on efficacy and safety outcomes in the phase 3 ANDROMEDA trial.
    UNASSIGNED: Rates of overall complete hematologic response and cardiac and renal response at 6 months and median major organ deterioration-progression-free survival and major organ deterioration-event-free survival were compared across cardiac stages (I, II, or IIIA) and treatments (daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone [D-VCd] or bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone [VCd]). Rates of adverse events (AEs) were summarized for patients with and without baseline cardiac involvement and by cardiac stage.
    UNASSIGNED: Median follow-up duration was 15.7 months. The proportions of stage I, II, and IIIA patients were 23.2%, 40.2%, and 36.6%. Across cardiac stages, hematologic and organ response rates were higher and major organ deterioration-progression-free survival and major organ deterioration-event-free survival were longer with D-VCd than VCd. AE rates were similar between treatments and by cardiac stage; serious AE rates were higher in patients with cardiac involvement and increased with increasing cardiac stage. The incidence of cardiac events was numerically greater with D-VCd vs VCd, but the rate of grade 3 or 4 events was similar. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate for cardiac events was lower with D-VCd than VCd (median exposure 13.4 and 5.3 months, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: These findings demonstrate the efficacy of D-VCd over VCd in patients with newly diagnosed amyloid light chain amyloidosis across cardiac stages, thus supporting its use in patients with cardiac involvement. (NCT03201965).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺乏接受包括单独抗凝在内的药物治疗的Budd-Chairi综合征(BCS)患者的长期预后数据。
    连续患者(N=138,平均值[标准差,SD]年龄29.3[12.9]岁;66名男性)患有BCS,仅接受药物治疗,包括抗凝治疗,纳入最少随访12个月.初始反应被分类为完全(CR),部分(PR)或无应答(NR),并作为应答丧失(LoR)或应答维持(MoR)进行随访。基线的关联,评估了具有不同反应的临床和生化参数.
    76例患者(55.1%)有CR,26例(18.8%)有PR,36例(26.1%)有NR。具有PR或NR的人后来都没有CR。在中位随访40(范围12-174)个月时,LoR在PR组比CR组更常见(12[46.2%]vs18[23.7%],P=0.03)。LoR与腹水的存在相关(比值比[OR]1.5;95%置信区间[CI]0.06-0.71),基线和随访期间的胃肠道出血(OR1.33;95%CI0.09-0.82)或黄疸(OR1.01;95%CI0.11-0.97)(OR0.018;95%CI1.006-1.030)。NR(28[77.8%])死亡率高于CR(15[19.7%],P=0.001)和PR(8[30.8%],P=0.001)。在二元逻辑回归分析中,基线时腹水的存在与LoR相关(OR0.303[0.098-0.931]).
    初始CR患者的生存率优于无反应者。三分之一的人在后续行动中有LoR。基线时腹水的存在与LoR相关。
    UNASSIGNED: There is lack of data on long-term outcomes of patients with Budd-Chairi Syndrome (BCS) treated with medical therapy including anticoagulation alone.
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients (N = 138, mean [standard deviation, SD] age 29.3 [12.9] years; 66 men) with BCS, treated with medical therapy alone including anticoagulation, with minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. Initial response was classified as complete (CR), partial (PR) or nonresponse (NR) and on follow-up as loss of response (LoR) or maintenance of response (MoR). The association of baseline, clinical and biochemical parameters with different responses was evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy-six patients (55.1%) had CR, 26 (18.8%) had PR and 36 (26.1%) had NR. None with PR or NR had CR later. At a median follow-up of 40 (range 12-174) months, LoR was more common in PR group than in CR group (12 [46.2%] vs 18 [23.7%], P = 0.03). LoR was associated with presence of ascites (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.71), gastrointestinal bleed (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.09-0.82) or jaundice (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.11-0.97) at baseline and duration of follow-up (OR 0.018; 95% CI 1.006-1.030). Mortality was higher in NR (28 [77.8%]) compared with CR (15 [19.7%], P = 0.001) and PR (8 [30.8%], P = 0.001). On binary logistic regression analysis, presence of ascites at baseline was associated with LoR (OR 0.303 [0.098-0.931]).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with initial CR have better survival than nonresponders. One-third had LoR on follow-up. The presence of ascites at baseline is associated with LoR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UASSIGNED:由于通过成像的实体瘤(irRECIST)的免疫相关反应评估标准大大低估了对免疫治疗的客观反应,我们建立了基于肿瘤标志物(RecistTM)的实体瘤应答评估标准,以探讨RecistTM是否可以弥补irRECIST标准的缺陷.
    未经评估:这是一项观察性研究,它由两部分组成。第一部分(A组)是一项回顾性研究,包括恶性实体瘤患者。第二部分(B组)是一项前瞻性研究,EGFR阴性和ALK阴性的IIIB-IV期非小细胞肺癌患者接受一线治疗.从2017年1月到2020年9月,招募了一百一十名接受免疫治疗的肿瘤标志物增加三倍的患者。通过irRECIST和RecystTM评估对免疫疗法的治疗反应。功效,总生存期(OS),统计比较不同评价标准下的首次评价时间和最早响应时间。
    UNASSIGNED:通过RecystTM标准评估的治疗反应与通过irRECIST标准评估的治疗反应不一致(Kappa=0.386,p<0.001)。与irRECIST标准相比,RecystTM的完成反应(CR)率更高(20.9%vs1.8%,p<0.001)。RecystTM标准下的最早响应时间比irRECIST标准下的早3.42周(u=-5.233,p<0.001)。肿瘤标志物相关完全应答(tmCR)和肿瘤标志物相关部分应答(tmPR)的中位OS差异显著,以及tmPR和肿瘤标志物相关的稳定疾病(tmSD)之间(χ2=15.572,p<0.001;χ2=7.720,p=0.005),但不在tmSD和肿瘤标志物相关进展性疾病(tmPD)之间(χ2=1.596,p=0.206)。当同时应用这两个标准时,对于根据irRECIST标准患有免疫相关CR/免疫相关PR(irCR/irPR)(n=54)的患者,达到tmCR(n=22)和tmPR(n=32)的中位OS差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.011,p<0.001)。RecystTM标准可以比irRECIST标准更准确地预测1年和2年OS(AUC:0.862vs0.552,0.649vs0.521;两者均p<0.001)。在RecistTM中,已观察到4例患者的肿瘤标志物出现假性进展。
    未经评估:RecistTM标准可以有效区分CR,PR,SD,这可能有助于解决RECIST标准在评估免疫治疗反应方面的缺陷,特别是在评估患者是否可以尽快达到深度甚至完全的反应。
    UNASSIGNED:这项工作得到了重庆市卫生和计划生育委员会重点项目的支持(杨雪琴,2019ZDXM011)。
    UNASSIGNED: As the immune-related response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (irRECIST) by imaging greatly underestimated the objective response to immunotherapy, we established the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors based on tumor markers (RecistTM) to explore whether RecistTM can compensate for the deficiencies of the irRECIST criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: This was an observational study, which consisted of two parts. The first part (Group A) was a retrospective study including the patients with malignant solid tumors. The second part (Group B) was a prospective study, which were EGFR-negative and ALK-negative patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line treatment. From January 2017 to September 2020, one hundred and ten patients with a three-time increase in tumor markers receiving immunotherapy were recruited. The treatment response to immunotherapy was evaluated by irRECIST and RecistTM. Efficacy, overall survival (OS), first evaluation time and earliest response time under the different evaluation criteria were compared by statistics.
    UNASSIGNED: The treatment response evaluated by the RecistTM criteria was not consistent with that evaluated by the irRECIST criteria (Kappa = 0.386, p < 0.001). RecistTM had a higher completed response (CR) rate compared to irRECIST criteria (20.9% vs 1.8%, p < 0.001). The earliest response time under the RecistTM criteria was 3.42 weeks earlier than that under the irRECIST criteria (u = -5.233, p < 0.001). There were significant differences in median OS between tumor marker-related complete response (tmCR) and tumor marker-related partial response (tmPR), as well as between tmPR and tumor marker-related stable disease (tmSD) (χ2 = 15.572, p < 0.001; χ2 = 7.720, p = 0.005), but not between tmSD and tumor marker-related progressive disease (tmPD) (χ2 = 1.596, p = 0.206). When applying both criteria together, for patients with immune-related CR / immune-related PR (irCR/irPR) (n = 54) under irRECIST criteria, there was a significant difference in median OS between achieving tmCR (n = 22) and tmPR (n = 32) (χ2 = 14.011, p < 0.001). RecistTM criteria can predict 1-year and 2-year OS more accurately than irRECIST criteria (AUCs:0.862 vs 0.552, 0.649 vs 0.521, respectively;both p < 0.001). In RecistTM, 4 patients had been observed with pseudoprogression in tumor markers.
    UNASSIGNED: The RecistTM criteria could effectively distinguish CR, PR, and SD, which may help resolve the shortcomings of the RECIST criteria in evaluating the treatment response to immunotherapy, especially in assessing whether patients can achieve deep or even complete response as soon as possible.
    UNASSIGNED: This work was supported by the Key projects of Chongqing Health and Family Planning Commission (to Xueqin Yang, 2019ZDXM011).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名69岁的男性,12年前有非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌病史,他抱怨有肉眼血尿。他被诊断为浸润性T4膀胱癌,并侵犯了内动脉的一个分支,并接受了基于铂的化学放射疗法。然而,肿瘤进展为广泛浸润骨盆壁,左腿疼痛和肿胀发展。开始使用Pembrolizumab,经过14个疗程的治疗完全解决了肿瘤。由于不良事件,Pembrolizumab在治疗20个疗程后停用。然而,在停止派姆单抗治疗后,患者的完全缓解时间超过2年.
    A 69-year-old man with a history of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer 12 years ago presented complaining of gross hematuria. He was diagnosed as having invasive T4 bladder cancer with invasion to a branch of the internal iliac artery and received platinum-based chemo-radiation therapy. However, the tumor progressed to extensively infiltrate the pelvic wall, and left leg pain and swelling developed. Pembrolizumab was started, which entirely resolved the tumor after 14 courses of treatment. Pembrolizumab was discontinued after 20 courses of treatment because of adverse events. However, the patient has remained in complete response for over 2 years after pembrolizumab cessation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在研究接受药物洗脱珠(DEB)经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的大肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的预后和生存率。此外,将肿瘤形态与疗效和生存率相关,以分析形态与结局的关联.
    接受DEB-TACE治疗的大型HCC(>5cm)患者进行回顾性分析。评估患者的客观反应(OR)和总生存期(OS),这是从DEB-TACE的第一个疗程到最后一次随访/死亡计算的。计算整个研究组的OR和OS,并在孤立性与多灶性HCC组成的亚组之间进行比较。单叶与双叶病,明确与不明确的HCC,同质增强的HCC与异质增强的HCC相比。
    25例患者进行了67例DEB-TACE手术(平均:每位患者2.7±1.4次)。平均病灶大小为9.9±4.5cm。25名患者中,13例(52%)患有多灶性HCC。单叶病见于15例患者(60%)。平均随访时间为24.4个月。或在6个月和12个月分别为56%和48%,分别,明确的病变显示更好的OR。中位OS为28个月(95%置信区间,12.3–43.6).12个月和24个月的OS率分别为92%和57%,分别。OS在明确定义的HCC和单叶疾病中被认为是优越的。
    在这项研究中,DEB-TACE已显示在具有保留的肝功能的大/多灶性HCC的患者中具有良好的反应。明确的HCC和单叶病具有更好的反应和生存率。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to study the outcome and survival of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving drug-eluting beads (DEBs) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). In addition, tumor morphologies were correlated with the response and survival to analyze the association of morphology with the outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with large HCC (>5 cm) who underwent DEB-TACE for palliation were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were assessed for objective response (OR) and overall survival (OS), which was calculated from the first session of DEB-TACE to the last follow-up/death. OR and OS were calculated for the entire study group and were compared among the subgroups consisting of solitary versus multifocal HCC, unilobar versus bilobar disease, well-defined versus ill-defined HCC, and HCC with homogeneous enhancement versus HCC with heterogeneous enhancement.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty-seven DEB-TACE procedures were performed in 25 patients (average: 2.7 ± 1.4 sessions per patient). The mean lesion size was 9.9 ± 4.5 cm. Of 25 patients, 13 (52%) had multifocal HCC. Unilobar disease was seen in 15 patients (60%). The mean duration of follow-up was 24.4 months. OR at 6 and 12 months were 56% and 48%, respectively, with well-defined lesions showing better OR. The median OS was 28 months (95% confidence interval, 12.3-43.6). OS rate at 12 and 24 months was 92% and 57%, respectively. OS was seen to be superior in well-defined HCC and unilobar disease.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, DEB-TACE has shown to have a good response in patients having large/multifocal HCC with preserved liver functions. Well-defined HCC and unilobar disease have a better response and survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号