CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

临床药理学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的目的是在一个全国性的大型队列中评估与长期使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)相关的结直肠腺癌(CRA)的风险。
    方法:回顾性队列研究。
    方法:这项研究是在国家一级进行的,涵盖了整个瑞典人口。
    方法:本研究利用瑞典国家登记处确定2005年7月至2012年12月期间累计使用PPI≥180天的所有成年人,不包括随访时间少于1年的参与者。总共包括754118名维护PPI用户,最长随访7.5年。
    方法:维持PPI使用(累计≥180天),与维持组胺-2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)使用比较。
    方法:主要结局指标是CRA的风险,以95%置信区间(CI)的标准化发生率(SIR)表示。进行亚组分析以探讨适应症的影响,肿瘤位置,肿瘤分期和随访时间。采用多变量Poisson回归模型来估计PPI与H2RA使用的发生率比率(IRRs)和95%CI。
    结果:男性和女性与普通人群相比(SIR1.10,95%CI=1.06至1.13),维持PPI使用者的CRA风险略有升高。年龄在18-39岁(SIR2.79,95%CI=1.62至4.47)和40-49岁(SIR2.02,95%CI=1.65至2.45)的个体风险明显高于普通人群。与普通人群相比,右侧CRA的风险更高(SIR1.26,95%CI=1.20至1.32)。维持PPI使用者和维持H2RA使用者的CRA风险无显著差异(IRR1.05,95%CI=0.87~1.27,p<0.05)。
    结论:维持PPI使用可能与CRA风险增加有关,但是需要延长观察时间。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) associated with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a large nationwide cohort.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: This research was conducted at the national level, encompassing the entire population of Sweden.
    METHODS: This study utilised Swedish national registries to identify all adults who had ≥180 days of cumulative PPI use between July 2005 and December 2012, excluding participants who were followed up for less than 1 year. A total of 754 118 maintenance PPI users were included, with a maximum follow-up of 7.5 years.
    METHODS: Maintenance PPI use (cumulative≥180 days), with a comparator of maintenance histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use.
    METHODS: The primary outcome measure was the risk of CRA, presented as standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the impact of indications, tumour locations, tumour stages and the duration of follow-up. A multivariable Poisson regression model was fitted to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs of PPI versus H2RA use.
    RESULTS: Maintenance PPI users exhibited a slightly elevated risk of CRA compared to the general population (SIR 1.10, 95% CI=1.06 to 1.13) for both men and women. Individuals aged 18-39 (SIR 2.79, 95% CI=1.62 to 4.47) and 40-49 (SIR 2.02, 95% CI=1.65 to 2.45) had significantly higher risks than the general population. Right-sided CRA showed a higher risk compared to the general population (SIR 1.26, 95% CI=1.20 to 1.32). There was no significant difference in the risk of CRA between maintenance PPI users and maintenance H2RA users (IRR 1.05, 95% CI=0.87 to 1.27, p<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance PPI use may be associated with an increased risk of CRA, but a prolonged observation time is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究比较了三种人工智能(AI)平台在确定即将毕业的医生的药物治疗沟通能力方面的潜力。
    方法:我们提出了三个AI平台,即,坡助手©,ChatGPT©和GoogleBard©,使用结构化查询来生成适合于毕业医生的沟通技能能力和案例场景。这些病例包括15种需要药物处方的典型医疗条件。两位作者独立评估了AI增强的临床遭遇,它整合了各种信息,以创建以患者为中心的护理计划。通过使用清单的基于共识的方法,评估了为每种情景生成的通信组件.通过参考英国国家处方集,对每种情况下提供的说明和警告进行了评估。
    结果:AI平台在生成的能力领域中表现出重叠,尽管措辞有所不同。知识领域(基础和临床药理学,开处方,沟通和药物安全)得到了所有平台的一致认可。PoeAssistant©和ChatGPT©在每种情况下特定的药物治疗相关沟通问题上达成了广泛共识。共识主要包括致敬,处方仿制药,治疗目标和随访时间表。在患者的指导清晰度方面观察到差异,列出的副作用,警告和患者赋权。GoogleBard并未就患者沟通问题提供指导。
    结论:AI平台认识到能力与如何陈述的差异。PoeAssistant©和ChatGPT©展示了沟通问题的一致性。然而,在特定的技能成分中观察到显著的差异,表明人为干预对人工智能生成的输出进行批判性评估的必要性。
    OBJECTIVE: This study compared three artificial intelligence (AI) platforms\' potential to identify drug therapy communication competencies expected of a graduating medical doctor.
    METHODS: We presented three AI platforms, namely, Poe Assistant©, ChatGPT© and Google Bard©, with structured queries to generate communication skill competencies and case scenarios appropriate for graduating medical doctors. These case scenarios comprised 15 prototypical medical conditions that required drug prescriptions. Two authors independently evaluated the AI-enhanced clinical encounters, which integrated a diverse range of information to create patient-centred care plans. Through a consensus-based approach using a checklist, the communication components generated for each scenario were assessed. The instructions and warnings provided for each case scenario were evaluated by referencing the British National Formulary.
    RESULTS: AI platforms demonstrated overlap in competency domains generated, albeit with variations in wording. The domains of knowledge (basic and clinical pharmacology, prescribing, communication and drug safety) were unanimously recognized by all platforms. A broad consensus among Poe Assistant© and ChatGPT© on drug therapy-related communication issues specific to each case scenario was evident. The consensus primarily encompassed salutation, generic drug prescribed, treatment goals and follow-up schedules. Differences were observed in patient instruction clarity, listed side effects, warnings and patient empowerment. Google Bard did not provide guidance on patient communication issues.
    CONCLUSIONS: AI platforms recognized competencies with variations in how these were stated. Poe Assistant© and ChatGPT© exhibited alignment of communication issues. However, significant discrepancies were observed in specific skill components, indicating the necessity of human intervention to critically evaluate AI-generated outputs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于生理改变对药代动力学的影响,危重病患者存在不良β-内酰胺抗生素(β-内酰胺)暴露的风险。次优浓度可导致治疗失败或毒性。治疗药物监测(TDM)涉及根据测得的血浆浓度调整剂量和个性化给药,以提高改善暴露的可能性。尽管有潜在的好处,它的采用一直很缓慢,和实施数据,剂量适应性和安全性很少。该试验的目的是评估在重症监护病房中实施β-内酰胺TDM指导给药的可行性和保真度。
    方法:使用治疗药物监测(ADAPT-TDM)的β-内酰胺抗生素剂量AdaPtation可行性随机对照试验是单中心,未失明,可行性随机对照试验旨在纳入多达60名危重成人参与者(≥18岁).干预组每天进行TDM和剂量调整;标准护理组将进行血浆采样,但没有剂量调整。主要成果包括:(1)招聘的可行性,定义为从合格参与者池中招募的参与者数量,和(2)TDM的保真度,定义为TDM作为测试按预期交付的程度,从准确的样本收集中,样品处理到结果可用性。次要成果包括实现目标,TDM指导给药的摄取和神经毒性的发生率,肝毒性和肾毒性。
    背景:这项研究已获得阿尔弗雷德医院人类研究伦理委员会的批准,道德与研究治理办公室(参考:项目编号565/22;批准日期:22/11/2022)。将获得预期的同意,并根据赫尔辛基宣言进行研究。最终的手稿,包括聚合数据,将提交在同行评审的期刊上发表。ADAPT-TDM将确定β-内酰胺TDM指导的剂量适应是否可重复和可行,并提供在III期试验中实施该干预所需的重要信息。
    背景:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,ACTRN12623000032651。
    BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients are at risk of suboptimal beta-lactam antibiotic (beta-lactam) exposure due to the impact of altered physiology on pharmacokinetics. Suboptimal concentrations can lead to treatment failure or toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) involves adjusting doses based on measured plasma concentrations and individualising dosing to improve the likelihood of improving exposure. Despite its potential benefits, its adoption has been slow, and data on implementation, dose adaptation and safety are sparse. The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility and fidelity of implementing beta-lactam TDM-guided dosing in the intensive care unit setting.
    METHODS: A beta-lactam antibiotic Dose AdaPtation feasibility randomised controlled Trial using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (ADAPT-TDM) is a single-centre, unblinded, feasibility randomised controlled trial aiming to enroll up to 60 critically ill adult participants (≥18 years). TDM and dose adjustment will be performed daily in the intervention group; the standard of care group will undergo plasma sampling, but no dose adjustment. The main outcomes include: (1) feasibility of recruitment, defined as the number of participants who are recruited from a pool of eligible participants, and (2) fidelity of TDM, defined as the degree to which TDM as a test is delivered as intended, from accurate sample collection, sample processing to result availability. Secondary outcomes include target attainment, uptake of TDM-guided dosing and incidence of neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.
    BACKGROUND: This study has been approved by the Alfred Hospital human research ethics committee, Office of Ethics and Research Governance (reference: Project No. 565/22; date of approval: 22/11/2022). Prospective consent will be obtained and the study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The finalised manuscript, including aggregate data, will be submitted for publication in a peer reviewed journal. ADAPT-TDM will determine whether beta-lactam TDM-guided dose adaptation is reproducible and feasible and provide important information required to implement this intervention in a phase III trial.
    BACKGROUND: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12623000032651.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为中国兼职临床药师工作提供对问题和潜在解决策略的初步了解,为兼职临床药师的培养提供参考。
    方法:本研究在中国某三级教学医院进行,该项目持续了6个月。现象学方法用于指导研究设计。研究数据是通过与兼职临床药师进行一对一的半结构化访谈获得的,并通过专题分析对访谈数据进行编码和分析。
    结果:共有21名药剂师以半结构化的方式接受了访谈,结果表明,兼职临床药师的工作存在以下问题:现有的专业知识不足以满足临床服务的需求;兼职临床药师的职业定位不明确;临床药学实践缺乏职业自信心;开展药学服务工作没有合适的切入点;难以有效沟通,此外,针对当前的问题,提出了17种潜在的解决策略,可为临床药师兼职工作的开展提供参考。
    结论:兼职临床药师的工作目前还不成熟,这项研究得出的策略可能是解决兼职临床药学实践挑战的潜在解决方案。
    OBJECTIVE: To provide an initial understanding of problems and potential solution strategies for part-time clinical pharmacist work in China, and provide references for the training of part-time clinical pharmacists.
    METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in China, and the project lasted 6 months. Phenomenological methods were used to guide the research design. Research data were obtained by conducting one-to-one semistructured interviews with part-time clinical pharmacists, and interview data were coded and analysed through thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 21 pharmacists were interviewed in a semistructured manner, and the results showed that following problems exist in the work of part-time clinical pharmacists: the existing professional knowledge is not adequate to meet the demands of clinical service; the career orientation of part-time clinical pharmacists is not clear; lack of professional self-confidence in clinical pharmacy practice; there is no suitable entry point to carry out pharmacy service work; it is difficult to communicate effectively, and for in addition, 17 potential solution strategies are proposed for the current problems, which can provide reference for the development of part-time clinical pharmacists\' work.
    CONCLUSIONS: The work performed by part-time clinical pharmacists is currently immature and the strategies derived from this study may serve as potential solutions to resolve the part-time clinical pharmacy practice challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:纤维肌痛与慢性广泛性疼痛和睡眠障碍有关。多学科,多模式管理通常包括药物治疗;然而,目前用于治疗纤维肌痛的药物仅对30-60%的治疗个体提供有意义的益处.两种或两种以上不同药物的组合在临床实践中很常见,期望获得更好的疗效。耐受性或两者兼而有之;然而,需要进一步的研究来确定哪些组合实际上提供了额外的好处。因此,我们正在计划一项临床试验,以评估褪黑素(MLT)-普瑞巴林(PGB)联合应用于纤维肌痛患者.
    方法:这将是一个单中心,双盲,随机化,双假人,三个时期,交叉试验比较MLT-PGB组合与每种单药治疗的54名符合2016年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛标准的成年参与者.参与者将获得最大耐受剂量的MLT,PGB和MLT-PGB结合6周。主要结果将是每日疼痛强度(0-10);次要结果将包括纤维肌痛影响问卷,SF-36调查,医学结果研究睡眠量表,贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II),不良事件和其他措施。主要和次要结果的分析将涉及具有序列的线性混合模型,period,治疗,一阶保留和基线疼痛评分作为固定效应,参与者作为随机效应,以测试三种治疗方法之间是否存在任何治疗差异,并估计每种治疗方法的平均每日疼痛强度的最小二乘平均值。调整结转和时期效应(即,疼痛水平的稳定性)。
    背景:本试验已在国际标准随机对照试验编号登记处注册,ISRCTN#18278231已获得女王大学健康科学研究伦理委员会(女王HSREB协议#6040998)的伦理批准,目前正在审查加拿大卫生部天然和非处方健康产品局的临床试验申请。所有参与者将在试验参与前提供书面知情同意书。试验完成后,结果将在一个或多个生物医学杂志出版物中传播,并在一个或多个科学会议上发表。
    背景:本试验已在国际标准随机对照试验编号登记处注册,ISRCTN18278231。
    BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is associated with chronic widespread pain and disturbed sleep. Multidisciplinary, multimodal management often includes pharmacotherapy; however, current drugs used to treat fibromyalgia provide meaningful benefit to only 30-60% of treated individuals. Combining two or more different drugs is common in clinical practice with the expectation of better efficacy, tolerability or both; however, further research is needed to identify which combinations actually provide added benefit. Thus, we are planning a clinical trial to evaluate melatonin (MLT)-pregabalin (PGB) combination in participants with fibromyalgia.
    METHODS: This will be a single-centre, double-blind, randomised, double-dummy, three-period, crossover trial comparing a MLT-PGB combination to each monotherapy in 54 adult participants satisfying the 2016 American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia. Participants will receive maximally tolerated doses of MLT, PGB and MLT-PGB combination for 6 weeks. The primary outcome will be daily pain intensity (0-10); secondary outcomes will include the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, SF-36 survey, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), adverse events and other measures. Analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes will involve a linear mixed model with sequence, period, treatment, the first-order carryover and baseline pain score as fixed effects and participant as a random effect to test whether there are any treatment differences among three treatments and to estimate the least square mean of the mean daily pain intensity for each treatment, adjusting for carryover as well as period effects (ie, stability of pain levels).
    BACKGROUND: This trial has been registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, ISRCTN #18278231, has been granted ethical approval by the Queen\'s University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (Queen\'s HSREB Protocol #6040998) and is currently under review for a Clinical Trial Application to Health Canada Natural and Non-prescription Health Products Directorate. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to trial participation. Following trial completion, results will be disseminated in one or more biomedical journal publications and presented at one or more scientific meetings.
    BACKGROUND: This trial has been registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, ISRCTN18278231.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们研究了本妥昔单抗维多汀(BV)抗体-药物偶联物(ADC)和未偶联的单甲基奥瑞他汀E在血液恶性肿瘤中的药代动力学和暴露-反应关系。
    方法:该群体药代动力学分析包括来自5项成人和3项儿科研究的数据。模拟了每3周静脉注射BV1.8mg/kg(最大180mg)后虚拟成人和儿科人群的暴露情况。临床终点包括总反应率,≥2级周围神经病变(PN)和≥3级中性粒细胞减少症。
    结果:BVADC表现出线性药代动力学,用三室模型很好地描述,体重是暴露的唯一重要协变量。单甲基奥瑞他汀E的形成速率随时间变化。12至<18岁患者的模拟稳态BVADC暴露与成年患者相似,但在2至<12岁的患者中降低了23%-38%。尽管曝光率较低,在2至<12岁的人群中,每3周观察到BV1.8mg/kg的临床活动(总反应率:2至<12岁,60%;12至<18岁,43%)。在成人,但不是儿科患者,BVADC暴露增加与≥2级PN和≥3级中性粒细胞减少症的发生相关.
    结论:成人和儿科患者的BV药代动力学是一致的。2至<12岁患者的BVADC暴露较低,而不是≥12年,但疗效没有明显的临床相关差异,观察到≥2级PN或≥3级中性粒细胞减少.这些数据支持患者基于体重的BV剂量,无论年龄如何;因此,在2至<12年的剂量调整似乎没有必要。
    OBJECTIVE: We studied the pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of the brentuximab vedotin (BV) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and unconjugated monomethyl auristatin E in haematologic malignancies.
    METHODS: This population pharmacokinetic analysis included data from five adult and three paediatric studies. Exposures in virtual adult and paediatric populations following BV 1.8 mg/kg (maximum 180 mg) intravenously every 3 weeks were simulated. Clinical endpoints included overall response rate, grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN) and grade ≥3 neutropenia.
    RESULTS: BV ADC exhibited linear pharmacokinetics, well-described by a three-compartment model, with body weight being the only significant covariate for exposure. Monomethyl auristatin E exhibited time-varying formation rate. Simulated steady-state BV ADC exposures in patients aged 12 to <18 years were similar to those of adult patients, but 23%-38% lower in patients aged 2 to <12 years. Despite lower exposure, clinical activity was observed with BV 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks in those aged 2 to <12 years (overall response rate: 2 to <12 years, 60%; 12 to <18 years, 43%). In adult, but not paediatric patients, increased BV ADC exposures were associated with grade ≥2 PN and grade ≥3 neutropenia occurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: BV pharmacokinetics in adult and paediatric patients were consistent. BV ADC exposures were lower in patients aged 2 to <12 years vs. ≥12 years, but no apparent clinically relevant differences in efficacy, grade ≥2 PN or grade ≥3 neutropenia were observed. These data support body weight-based dosing of BV in patients irrespective of age; thus, dose adjustment in those 2 to <12 years does not appear warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病和抑郁症是全球十大健康负担之一。它们经常共存并表现出强烈的双向关系。抑郁症导致对自我护理活动的依从性下降。这会影响血糖控制并恶化2型糖尿病(T2D)。两种情况都有协同作用,并导致更大的并发症,住院治疗,医疗支出和更差的生活质量。在管理患有T2D和抑郁症的人方面没有共识。安非他酮是一种有效的抗抑郁药,具有许多适用于患有抑郁症的T2D的特性,包括良好的代谢特征,持续的体重减轻和性功能障碍的改善。我们将评估附加安非他酮的疗效和安全性与T2D和轻度抑郁症患者的标准治疗相比。这项研究可以为管理T2D和抑郁症的多发病率提供有价值的见解。这可以帮助减轻健康,这两种疾病的社会和经济负担。
    方法:这项交叉随机对照试验将招募患有T2D(5年或更长时间)的轻度抑郁症患者。他们将被随机分配给安非他酮和标准护理。治疗3个月后,将有1个月的冲洗期(不添加安非他酮,而标准治疗将继续)。在此之后,这两个手臂将被交换。参与者将被评估为糖化血红蛋白,坚持糖尿病自我护理活动,血脂谱,尿白蛋白与肌酐的比值,自主神经功能,性功能,生活质量和不良事件。
    背景:全印度医学科学研究所的机构伦理委员会,焦特布尔已批准本研究(AIIMS/IEC/2022/4172,2022年9月19日)。我们计划在研究现场通过封闭的小组讨论传播研究结果,科学会议,同行评审出版的手稿和社交媒体。
    背景:CTRI/2022/10/046411。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes and depression are among the 10 biggest health burdens globally. They often coexist and exhibit a strong bidirectional relationship. Depression leads to decreased adherence to self-care activities. This impacts glycaemic control and worsens type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Both conditions have a synergistic effect and lead to greater complications, hospitalisations, healthcare expenditure and a worse quality of life. There is no consensus on managing people with comorbid T2D and depression. Bupropion is an efficacious antidepressant with many properties suitable for T2D with depression, including a favourable metabolic profile, persistent weight loss and improvement in sexual dysfunction. We will assess the efficacy and safety of add-on bupropion compared with standard care in people with T2D and mild depression. This study can give valuable insights into managing the multimorbidity of T2D and depression. This can help mitigate the health, social and economic burden of both these diseases.
    METHODS: This cross-over randomised controlled trial will recruit people with T2D (for 5 years or more) with mild depression. They will be randomised to add-on bupropion and standard care. After 3 months of treatment, there will be a washout period of 1 month (without add-on bupropion while standard treatment will continue). Following this, the two arms will be swapped. Participants will be assessed for glycosylated haemoglobin, adherence to diabetes self-care activities, lipid profile, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, autonomic function, sexual function, quality of life and adverse events.
    BACKGROUND: The Institutional Ethics Committee at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur has approved this study (AIIMS/IEC/2022/4172, 19 September 2022). We plan to disseminate the research findings via closed group discussions at the site of study, scientific conferences, peer-reviewed published manuscripts and social media.
    BACKGROUND: CTRI/2022/10/046411.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估老年人口门诊处方中的抗生素处方实践及其决定因素。
    方法:以处方为基础,横断面研究。
    方法:阿斯马拉的六个社区连锁药店,厄立特里亚。
    方法:在阿斯马拉的六个社区连锁药房中,向老年人口(65岁及以上)分配所有门诊处方,厄立特里亚。
    方法:回顾性收集数据,2023年6月16日至2023年7月16日。抗生素处方实践是使用2023年世界卫生组织(WHO)访问评估的。手表和储备(AWARE)分类系统。使用IBMSPSS(V.26.0)进行描述性统计和逻辑回归。P值小于0.05被认为是显著的。
    结果:在发放给老年人的2680张门诊处方中,35.8%(95%CI:34.0,37.6)含有至少一种抗生素。此外,总共为老年人开了1061种抗生素。最常用的抗生素是环丙沙星(n=322,30.3%)和阿莫西林/克拉维酸(n=145,13.7%)。Access类别占抗生素的大多数(53.7%),Watch类别占32.1%。处方资格(调整后的赔率比(AOR)=0.60,95%CI:0.44,0.81)和多重用药(AOR=2.32,95%CI:1.26,4.27)是老年人群抗生素处方的重要决定因素。此外,性别(AOR=0.74,95%CI:0.56,0.98),处方者资格(AOR=0.49,95%CI:0.30~0.81)和医疗机构水平(AOR0.52,95%CI0.34~0.81)是Watch抗生素处方的重要决定因素.
    结论:相当数量的老年人口服用抗生素,其中一半以上属于Access类别。政策制定者需要进一步努力,以促进Access抗生素的使用,同时减少Watch抗生素的使用,以减轻与抗生素耐药性相关的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess antibiotic prescribing practice and its determinants among outpatient prescriptions dispensed to the elderly population.
    METHODS: A prescription-based, cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: Six community chain pharmacies in Asmara, Eritrea.
    METHODS: All outpatient prescriptions dispensed to the elderly population (aged 65 and above) in the six community chain pharmacies in Asmara, Eritrea.
    METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively, between 16 June 2023 and 16 July 2023. Antibiotic prescribing practice was assessed using the 2023 World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) classification system. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed using IBM SPSS (V.26.0). P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant.
    RESULTS: Of the 2680 outpatient prescriptions dispensed to elderly population, 35.8% (95% CI: 34.0, 37.6) contained at least one antibiotic. Moreover, a total of 1061 antibiotics were prescribed to the elderly population. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were ciprofloxacin (n=322, 30.3%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (n=145, 13.7%). The Access category accounted for the majority of antibiotics (53.7%) with 32.1% from the Watch category. Prescriber qualification (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR)= 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81) and polypharmacy (AOR= 2.32, 95% CI: 1.26, 4.27) were significant determinants of antibiotic prescribing in the elderly population. Besides, sex (AOR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.98), prescriber qualification (AOR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.30 to0.81) and level of health facility (AOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.81) were significant determinants of a Watch antibiotic prescription.
    CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics were prescribed to a considerable number of the elderly population, with more than half of them falling into the Access category. Further efforts by policy-makers are needed to promote the use of Access antibiotics while reducing the use of Watch antibiotics to mitigate risks associated with antimicrobial resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号