CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

临床药理学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    现代药物已经改变了癫痫,影响所有年龄段的人。然而,对于患有癫痫的年轻人来说,药物开发的框架已经停滞。在沙利度胺灾难之后,这种误解出现了,对于年龄<18岁的人来说,包括抗癫痫药物(ASM),需要单独的有效性和安全性证明,总体上称为“儿科药物开发”。对于ASM,这在某种程度上已经改变了。当局现在承认ASM在18年内也有效,但它们仍然需要“功效外推”,“好像未成年人是另一个物种。因此,在过去的几十年中,一些儿科临床癫痫研究是不必要的。更重要的是,这阻碍了对有意义的研究目标的研究。我们不需要确认ASM在18岁生日之后的工作。相反,我们需要学习如何通过预防癫痫发作和优化ASM的使用来预防年轻患者的脑损伤。在这里,我们讨论如何进行这项工作。
    Modern drugs have changed epilepsy, which affects people of all ages. However, for young people with epilepsy, the framework of drug development has stalled. In the wake of the thalidomide catastrophe, the misconception emerged that for people < 18 years of age drugs, including antiseizure medications (ASMs), need separate proof of efficacy and safety, overall called \"pediatric drug development\". For ASMs, this has changed to some degree. Authorities now accept that ASMs are effective in < 18 years as well, but they still require \"extrapolation of efficacy,\" as if minors were another species. As a result, some of the pediatric clinical epilepsy research over the past decades was unnecessary. Even more importantly, this has hampered research on meaningful research goals. We do not need to confirm that ASMs work before as they do after the 18th birthday. Instead, we need to learn how to prevent brain damage in young patients by preventing seizures and optimize ASMs\' uses. Herein we discuss how to proceed in this endeavor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的目的是在一个全国性的大型队列中评估与长期使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)相关的结直肠腺癌(CRA)的风险。
    方法:回顾性队列研究。
    方法:这项研究是在国家一级进行的,涵盖了整个瑞典人口。
    方法:本研究利用瑞典国家登记处确定2005年7月至2012年12月期间累计使用PPI≥180天的所有成年人,不包括随访时间少于1年的参与者。总共包括754118名维护PPI用户,最长随访7.5年。
    方法:维持PPI使用(累计≥180天),与维持组胺-2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)使用比较。
    方法:主要结局指标是CRA的风险,以95%置信区间(CI)的标准化发生率(SIR)表示。进行亚组分析以探讨适应症的影响,肿瘤位置,肿瘤分期和随访时间。采用多变量Poisson回归模型来估计PPI与H2RA使用的发生率比率(IRRs)和95%CI。
    结果:男性和女性与普通人群相比(SIR1.10,95%CI=1.06至1.13),维持PPI使用者的CRA风险略有升高。年龄在18-39岁(SIR2.79,95%CI=1.62至4.47)和40-49岁(SIR2.02,95%CI=1.65至2.45)的个体风险明显高于普通人群。与普通人群相比,右侧CRA的风险更高(SIR1.26,95%CI=1.20至1.32)。维持PPI使用者和维持H2RA使用者的CRA风险无显著差异(IRR1.05,95%CI=0.87~1.27,p<0.05)。
    结论:维持PPI使用可能与CRA风险增加有关,但是需要延长观察时间。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) associated with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a large nationwide cohort.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: This research was conducted at the national level, encompassing the entire population of Sweden.
    METHODS: This study utilised Swedish national registries to identify all adults who had ≥180 days of cumulative PPI use between July 2005 and December 2012, excluding participants who were followed up for less than 1 year. A total of 754 118 maintenance PPI users were included, with a maximum follow-up of 7.5 years.
    METHODS: Maintenance PPI use (cumulative≥180 days), with a comparator of maintenance histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use.
    METHODS: The primary outcome measure was the risk of CRA, presented as standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the impact of indications, tumour locations, tumour stages and the duration of follow-up. A multivariable Poisson regression model was fitted to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs of PPI versus H2RA use.
    RESULTS: Maintenance PPI users exhibited a slightly elevated risk of CRA compared to the general population (SIR 1.10, 95% CI=1.06 to 1.13) for both men and women. Individuals aged 18-39 (SIR 2.79, 95% CI=1.62 to 4.47) and 40-49 (SIR 2.02, 95% CI=1.65 to 2.45) had significantly higher risks than the general population. Right-sided CRA showed a higher risk compared to the general population (SIR 1.26, 95% CI=1.20 to 1.32). There was no significant difference in the risk of CRA between maintenance PPI users and maintenance H2RA users (IRR 1.05, 95% CI=0.87 to 1.27, p<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance PPI use may be associated with an increased risk of CRA, but a prolonged observation time is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为中国兼职临床药师工作提供对问题和潜在解决策略的初步了解,为兼职临床药师的培养提供参考。
    方法:本研究在中国某三级教学医院进行,该项目持续了6个月。现象学方法用于指导研究设计。研究数据是通过与兼职临床药师进行一对一的半结构化访谈获得的,并通过专题分析对访谈数据进行编码和分析。
    结果:共有21名药剂师以半结构化的方式接受了访谈,结果表明,兼职临床药师的工作存在以下问题:现有的专业知识不足以满足临床服务的需求;兼职临床药师的职业定位不明确;临床药学实践缺乏职业自信心;开展药学服务工作没有合适的切入点;难以有效沟通,此外,针对当前的问题,提出了17种潜在的解决策略,可为临床药师兼职工作的开展提供参考。
    结论:兼职临床药师的工作目前还不成熟,这项研究得出的策略可能是解决兼职临床药学实践挑战的潜在解决方案。
    OBJECTIVE: To provide an initial understanding of problems and potential solution strategies for part-time clinical pharmacist work in China, and provide references for the training of part-time clinical pharmacists.
    METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in China, and the project lasted 6 months. Phenomenological methods were used to guide the research design. Research data were obtained by conducting one-to-one semistructured interviews with part-time clinical pharmacists, and interview data were coded and analysed through thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 21 pharmacists were interviewed in a semistructured manner, and the results showed that following problems exist in the work of part-time clinical pharmacists: the existing professional knowledge is not adequate to meet the demands of clinical service; the career orientation of part-time clinical pharmacists is not clear; lack of professional self-confidence in clinical pharmacy practice; there is no suitable entry point to carry out pharmacy service work; it is difficult to communicate effectively, and for in addition, 17 potential solution strategies are proposed for the current problems, which can provide reference for the development of part-time clinical pharmacists\' work.
    CONCLUSIONS: The work performed by part-time clinical pharmacists is currently immature and the strategies derived from this study may serve as potential solutions to resolve the part-time clinical pharmacy practice challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病和抑郁症是全球十大健康负担之一。它们经常共存并表现出强烈的双向关系。抑郁症导致对自我护理活动的依从性下降。这会影响血糖控制并恶化2型糖尿病(T2D)。两种情况都有协同作用,并导致更大的并发症,住院治疗,医疗支出和更差的生活质量。在管理患有T2D和抑郁症的人方面没有共识。安非他酮是一种有效的抗抑郁药,具有许多适用于患有抑郁症的T2D的特性,包括良好的代谢特征,持续的体重减轻和性功能障碍的改善。我们将评估附加安非他酮的疗效和安全性与T2D和轻度抑郁症患者的标准治疗相比。这项研究可以为管理T2D和抑郁症的多发病率提供有价值的见解。这可以帮助减轻健康,这两种疾病的社会和经济负担。
    方法:这项交叉随机对照试验将招募患有T2D(5年或更长时间)的轻度抑郁症患者。他们将被随机分配给安非他酮和标准护理。治疗3个月后,将有1个月的冲洗期(不添加安非他酮,而标准治疗将继续)。在此之后,这两个手臂将被交换。参与者将被评估为糖化血红蛋白,坚持糖尿病自我护理活动,血脂谱,尿白蛋白与肌酐的比值,自主神经功能,性功能,生活质量和不良事件。
    背景:全印度医学科学研究所的机构伦理委员会,焦特布尔已批准本研究(AIIMS/IEC/2022/4172,2022年9月19日)。我们计划在研究现场通过封闭的小组讨论传播研究结果,科学会议,同行评审出版的手稿和社交媒体。
    背景:CTRI/2022/10/046411。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes and depression are among the 10 biggest health burdens globally. They often coexist and exhibit a strong bidirectional relationship. Depression leads to decreased adherence to self-care activities. This impacts glycaemic control and worsens type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Both conditions have a synergistic effect and lead to greater complications, hospitalisations, healthcare expenditure and a worse quality of life. There is no consensus on managing people with comorbid T2D and depression. Bupropion is an efficacious antidepressant with many properties suitable for T2D with depression, including a favourable metabolic profile, persistent weight loss and improvement in sexual dysfunction. We will assess the efficacy and safety of add-on bupropion compared with standard care in people with T2D and mild depression. This study can give valuable insights into managing the multimorbidity of T2D and depression. This can help mitigate the health, social and economic burden of both these diseases.
    METHODS: This cross-over randomised controlled trial will recruit people with T2D (for 5 years or more) with mild depression. They will be randomised to add-on bupropion and standard care. After 3 months of treatment, there will be a washout period of 1 month (without add-on bupropion while standard treatment will continue). Following this, the two arms will be swapped. Participants will be assessed for glycosylated haemoglobin, adherence to diabetes self-care activities, lipid profile, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, autonomic function, sexual function, quality of life and adverse events.
    BACKGROUND: The Institutional Ethics Committee at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur has approved this study (AIIMS/IEC/2022/4172, 19 September 2022). We plan to disseminate the research findings via closed group discussions at the site of study, scientific conferences, peer-reviewed published manuscripts and social media.
    BACKGROUND: CTRI/2022/10/046411.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估老年人口门诊处方中的抗生素处方实践及其决定因素。
    方法:以处方为基础,横断面研究。
    方法:阿斯马拉的六个社区连锁药店,厄立特里亚。
    方法:在阿斯马拉的六个社区连锁药房中,向老年人口(65岁及以上)分配所有门诊处方,厄立特里亚。
    方法:回顾性收集数据,2023年6月16日至2023年7月16日。抗生素处方实践是使用2023年世界卫生组织(WHO)访问评估的。手表和储备(AWARE)分类系统。使用IBMSPSS(V.26.0)进行描述性统计和逻辑回归。P值小于0.05被认为是显著的。
    结果:在发放给老年人的2680张门诊处方中,35.8%(95%CI:34.0,37.6)含有至少一种抗生素。此外,总共为老年人开了1061种抗生素。最常用的抗生素是环丙沙星(n=322,30.3%)和阿莫西林/克拉维酸(n=145,13.7%)。Access类别占抗生素的大多数(53.7%),Watch类别占32.1%。处方资格(调整后的赔率比(AOR)=0.60,95%CI:0.44,0.81)和多重用药(AOR=2.32,95%CI:1.26,4.27)是老年人群抗生素处方的重要决定因素。此外,性别(AOR=0.74,95%CI:0.56,0.98),处方者资格(AOR=0.49,95%CI:0.30~0.81)和医疗机构水平(AOR0.52,95%CI0.34~0.81)是Watch抗生素处方的重要决定因素.
    结论:相当数量的老年人口服用抗生素,其中一半以上属于Access类别。政策制定者需要进一步努力,以促进Access抗生素的使用,同时减少Watch抗生素的使用,以减轻与抗生素耐药性相关的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess antibiotic prescribing practice and its determinants among outpatient prescriptions dispensed to the elderly population.
    METHODS: A prescription-based, cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: Six community chain pharmacies in Asmara, Eritrea.
    METHODS: All outpatient prescriptions dispensed to the elderly population (aged 65 and above) in the six community chain pharmacies in Asmara, Eritrea.
    METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively, between 16 June 2023 and 16 July 2023. Antibiotic prescribing practice was assessed using the 2023 World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) classification system. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed using IBM SPSS (V.26.0). P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant.
    RESULTS: Of the 2680 outpatient prescriptions dispensed to elderly population, 35.8% (95% CI: 34.0, 37.6) contained at least one antibiotic. Moreover, a total of 1061 antibiotics were prescribed to the elderly population. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were ciprofloxacin (n=322, 30.3%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (n=145, 13.7%). The Access category accounted for the majority of antibiotics (53.7%) with 32.1% from the Watch category. Prescriber qualification (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR)= 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81) and polypharmacy (AOR= 2.32, 95% CI: 1.26, 4.27) were significant determinants of antibiotic prescribing in the elderly population. Besides, sex (AOR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.98), prescriber qualification (AOR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.30 to0.81) and level of health facility (AOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.81) were significant determinants of a Watch antibiotic prescription.
    CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics were prescribed to a considerable number of the elderly population, with more than half of them falling into the Access category. Further efforts by policy-makers are needed to promote the use of Access antibiotics while reducing the use of Watch antibiotics to mitigate risks associated with antimicrobial resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多重用药在多病患者中很常见,通常导致不适当的药物使用,并与虚弱的风险增加有关,住院和死亡率。结构化药物审查(SMR)已成为优化药物使用的有希望的方法。然而,研究它们的功效是有限的。这篇综述旨在评估SMR对改善初级保健环境中多发病率和多药房成人预后的影响。此外,这项审查旨在确定SMR交付模式的主要模式和趋势。
    方法:将使用OvidMEDLINE进行系统评价,OvidEmbase,WebofScience和CINAHL(1997年至今)。主要结果将包括与药物相关的措施,如剂量,频率和剂型。调查的次要结果将包括身体,心理,功能和卫生服务成果,据报道。两名独立评审员将进行筛选和数据提取,通过讨论解决分歧。一旦确定了合格的研究,提取的数据将以表格格式汇总。将使用Cochrane偏差风险2工具或纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估文章中的偏差风险,根据检索到的研究的设计。亚组分析将使用人口统计变量和数据支持的交付模式进行。如果合适,将对提取的数据进行荟萃分析,以确定SMR对报告结局的影响.如果由于异质性而无法进行荟萃分析,将采用叙事综合方法。
    背景:这项拟议的审查不受道德批准,因为它旨在整理和总结同行评审,公布的证据。该协议和随后的审查将在同行评审的期刊上传播,会议和患者主导的横向总结。
    CRD42023454965。
    BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common among individuals with multimorbidity, often leading to inappropriate medication use and is associated with an increased risk of frailty, hospitalisation and mortality. Structured medication reviews (SMRs) have emerged as a promising method for optimising medication use. However, research examining their efficacy is limited. This review aims to evaluate the impact of SMRs on improving outcomes for adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in primary care settings. Additionally, this review seeks to identify prevailing patterns and trends in the mode of delivery of SMRs.
    METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL (1997-present). Primary outcomes will include medication-related measures such as dose, frequency and dosage form. Secondary outcomes under investigation will include physical, mental, functional and health service outcomes, as reported. Two independent reviewers will conduct the screening and data extraction, resolving disagreements through discussion. Once eligible studies are identified, the extracted data will be summarised in tabular format. The risk of bias in the articles will be assessed using either the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, depending on the design of the studies retrieved. Subgroup analysis will be performed using demographic variables and modes of delivery where the data supports. If appropriate, a meta-analysis of the data extracted will be conducted to determine the impact of the SMRs on reported outcomes. If a meta-analysis is not possible due to heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis approach will be adopted.
    BACKGROUND: This proposed review is exempt from ethical approval as it aims to collate and summarise peer-reviewed, published evidence. This protocol and the subsequent review will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conferences and patient-led lay summaries.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42023454965.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解甘肃省儿科超说明书用药的流行现状和费用,中国,以及潜在的影响因素。
    方法:根据《中国药品参考》(中国药品参考,MCDEX)数据库。处方的证据由现有的临床实践指南和Micromedex2021汇编中的Thomson等级确定。单因素回归分析后,我们使用logistic回归分析影响儿科超说明书用药的特征。
    方法:对甘肃省196家二级、三级医院门诊儿科处方进行多中心横断面研究,中国,2020年3月和9月。
    结果:我们检索了104029张儿科处方,其中39480(38.0%)包含标签外使用。使用非说明书药物治疗的最常见疾病是呼吸系统疾病(n=15831,占40.1%)。四分之一的标签外处方有足够的证据基础(n=10130,25.6%)。未经批准的适应症是最常见的标签外药物使用类型(n=25891,65.6%)。总共有1177种不同的药物被处方在标签外,多酶片剂是最常见的药物(n=1790,3.5%)。处方外药物的总费用为日元106116/天。三级医院的处方处方频率低于二级医院。与其他类型的药物相比,外用制剂更常被处方。高级临床医生比中级和初级临床医生更经常地开处方。
    结论:在中国儿科实践中,超说明书用药普遍存在。四分之三的处方可能包括不适当的药物使用,到2020年,甘肃省每天的经济负担约为81,000日元,人口为2500万。我国儿科超说明书用药管理有待改进
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the current prevalence and cost of paediatric off-label drug prescriptions in Gansu, China, and the potential influencing factors.
    METHODS: The prevalence of off-label prescriptions in paediatrics was evaluated according to the National Medical Products Administration drug instructions in the China Pharmaceutical Reference (China Pharmaceutical Reference, MCDEX) database. The evidence of the prescription was determined by existing clinical practice guidelines and the Thomson Grade in the Micromedex 2021 compendium. We used logistic regression to investigate the characteristics that influence paediatric off-label drug use after single-factor regression analysis.
    METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional study of outpatient paediatric prescriptions in 196 secondary and tertiary hospitals in Gansu Province, China, in March and September 2020.
    RESULTS: We retrieved 104 029 paediatric prescriptions, of which 39 480 (38.0%) contained off-label use. The most common diseases treated by off-label drugs were respiratory system diseases (n=15 831, 40.1%). A quarter of off-label prescriptions had adequate evidence basis (n=10 130, 25.6%). Unapproved indications were the most common type of off-label drug use (n=25 891, 65.6%). A total of 1177 different drugs were prescribed off-label, with multienzyme tablets being the most common drug (n=1790, 3.5%). The total cost of the prescribed off-label drugs was ¥106 116/day. Off-label prescriptions were less frequent in tertiary than in secondary hospitals. Topical preparations were more commonly prescribed off-label than other types of drugs. Senior-level clinicians prescribed drugs off-label more often than intermediate and junior clinicians.
    CONCLUSIONS: Off-label drug use is widespread in paediatric practice in China. Three-quarters of the prescriptions may potentially include inappropriate medication use, resulting in a daily economic burden of about ¥81 000 in 2020 in Gansu Province with 25 million inhabitants. The management of off-label drug use in paediatrics in China needs improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2017年,输液袋的严重短缺导致药物管理实践从间歇性输液到静脉推注的范式变化。安全药物实践研究所提出了成人静脉推注药物的安全实践指南。另一项研究表明,在药房无菌区准备的现成给药可降低伤害风险,护士用药时间和药物费用。根据安全用药实践研究所的建议,我们决定对入院的成年患者实施无菌复合和静脉推注药物进行一项试点研究。在研究中,还确定了5个静脉推注抗生素注射器的稳定性。
    In 2017, a severe shortage of infusion bags resulted in a paradigm change in medication administration practice from intermittent infusion to intravenous push. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices proposed safe practice guidelines for adult intravenous push medications. A different study showed that ready-to-administer medication prepared in the sterile area of a pharmacy reduces the risk of harm, nurses\' time for medication administration and the cost of medications. Based on the recommendation of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, we decided to conduct a pilot study on the implementation of sterile compounding and administration of intravenous push medication in adult patients admitted to the hospital. In the study, the stability of five intravenous push antibiotic syringes was also determined in the syringes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在美国,阿片类药物过量已增加到前所未有的水平。阿片样物质拮抗剂纳洛酮的施用可以防止过量。
    目的:这项研究旨在揭示2018年至2021年为Medicaid患者开具的纳洛酮处方以及2019年的Medicare的药物流行病学模式。
    方法:观察性药物流行病学研究设置:美国医疗保险和医疗补助纳洛酮索赔干预:医疗补助国家药物利用数据文件用于提取有关处方数量和纳洛酮处方量的信息在国家和州一级。医疗保险提供者的使用和支付也被用来分析2019年的处方数据。
    方法:注意到纳洛酮处方率是四分位数分析的异常值。
    结果:每100,000名医疗补助参与者的通用纳洛酮处方数量减少了5.3%,而品牌纳洛酮处方从2018年到2021年增长了245.1%。2019年,最高州(新墨西哥州=1809.5)和最低州(南达科他州=54.6)之间的处方差异为33.1倍。在每10万名参与者进行校正后,医疗保险在最高的州(新墨西哥州)和最低的州(也是南达科他州)之间的处方差异为30.4倍。
    结论:从2018年到2021年,医疗补助患者的纳洛酮处方数量明显增加,表明国家对这种广泛的公共卫生紧急情况做出了反应。有必要对明显的州级差异的起源进行进一步研究。
    BACKGROUND: Opioid overdoses in the USA have increased to unprecedented levels. Administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone can prevent overdoses.
    OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to reveal the pharmacoepidemiologic patterns in naloxone prescribing to Medicaid patients from 2018 to 2021 as well as Medicare in 2019.
    METHODS: Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study SETTING: US Medicare and Medicaid naloxone claims INTERVENTION: The Medicaid State Drug Utilisation Data File was utilised to extract information on the number of prescriptions and the amount prescribed of naloxone at a national and state level. The Medicare Provider Utilisation and Payment was also utilised to analyse prescription data from 2019.
    METHODS: States with naloxone prescription rates that were outliers of quartile analysis were noted.
    RESULTS: The number of generic naloxone prescriptions per 100 000 Medicaid enrollees decreased by 5.3%, whereas brand naloxone prescriptions increased by 245.1% from 2018 to 2021. There was a 33.1-fold difference in prescriptions between the highest (New Mexico=1809.5) and lowest (South Dakota=54.6) states in 2019. Medicare saw a 30.4-fold difference in prescriptions between the highest (New Mexico) and lowest states (also South Dakota) after correcting per 100 000 enrollees.
    CONCLUSIONS: This pronounced increase in the number of naloxone prescriptions to Medicaid patients from 2018 to 2021 indicates a national response to this widespread public health emergency. Further research into the origins of the pronounced state-level disparities is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估是否有重点,对于从医院转院到家庭的患者,专家级药物管理干预在预防抗凝相关不良事件方面是可行的,并且可能有效.
    方法:随机,并行设计。
    方法:安大略省南部六个医院的医疗病房,加拿大。
    方法:18岁或以上的成年人出院回家,服用口服抗凝剂(OAC)至少4周。
    方法:临床药理学家主导的干预,包括详细的出院用药管理计划,1个月的护理交接和出院后早期虚拟检查访问,并进行3个月的随访。对照组接受常规护理。
    方法:主要结果是研究可行性结果(招募,保留率和每位患者的费用)。次要结局包括不良抗凝安全事件复合,过渡期护理的质量,生活质量,抗凝知识,满意的护理,药物和卫生资源利用方面的问题。
    结果:广泛的招募限制期加上出院时难以进入患者,对可行性产生负面影响,尤其是招募的每位患者的费用。在接受筛查的845名患者中,167人符合条件,56人随机分组。平均年龄(±SD)为71.2±12.5岁,42.9%女性,有两个失去了后续。干预患者更有可能将他们管理OAC的能力评价为改善(17/27(63.0%)vs7/22(31.8%),OR3.6(95%CI1.1至12.0))及其护理连续性得到改善(21/27(77.8%)vs2/22(9.1%),OR35.0(95%CI6.3至194.2))。更少的干预患者服用一种或多种不适当的药物(7(22.5%)vs15(60%),OR0.19(95%CI0.06至0.62))。
    结论:这项试点随机对照试验表明,对服用OAC的老年人进行出院时的过渡性护理干预广受好评,并可能对某些替代结果有效。但进行明确的大型试验成本过高。
    背景:NCT02777047。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a focused, expert medication management intervention is feasible and potentially effective in preventing anticoagulation-related adverse events for patients transitioning from hospital to home.
    METHODS: Randomised, parallel design.
    METHODS: Medical wards at six hospital sites in southern Ontario, Canada.
    METHODS: Adults 18 years of age or older being discharged to home on an oral anticoagulant (OAC) to be taken for at least 4 weeks.
    METHODS: Clinical pharmacologist-led intervention, including a detailed discharge medication management plan, a circle of care handover and early postdischarge virtual check-up visits to 1 month with 3-month follow-up. The control group received the usual care.
    METHODS: Primary outcomes were study feasibility outcomes (recruitment, retention and cost per patient). Secondary outcomes included adverse anticoagulant safety events composite, quality of transitional care, quality of life, anticoagulant knowledge, satisfaction with care, problems with medications and health resource utilisation.
    RESULTS: Extensive periods of restriction of recruitment plus difficulties accessing patients at the time of discharge negatively impacted feasibility, especially cost per patient recruited. Of 845 patients screened, 167 were eligible and 56 were randomised. The mean age (±SD) was 71.2±12.5 years, 42.9% females, with two lost to follow-up. Intervention patients were more likely to rate their ability to manage their OAC as improved (17/27 (63.0%) vs 7/22 (31.8%), OR 3.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 12.0)) and their continuity of care as improved (21/27 (77.8%) vs 2/22 (9.1%), OR 35.0 (95% CI 6.3 to 194.2)). Fewer intervention patients were taking one or more inappropriate medications (7 (22.5%) vs 15 (60%), OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.62)).
    CONCLUSIONS: This pilot randomised controlled trial suggests that a transitional care intervention at hospital discharge for older adults taking OACs was well received and potentially effective for some surrogate outcomes, but overly costly to proceed to a definitive large trial.
    BACKGROUND: NCT02777047.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号