CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

临床药理学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为中国兼职临床药师工作提供对问题和潜在解决策略的初步了解,为兼职临床药师的培养提供参考。
    方法:本研究在中国某三级教学医院进行,该项目持续了6个月。现象学方法用于指导研究设计。研究数据是通过与兼职临床药师进行一对一的半结构化访谈获得的,并通过专题分析对访谈数据进行编码和分析。
    结果:共有21名药剂师以半结构化的方式接受了访谈,结果表明,兼职临床药师的工作存在以下问题:现有的专业知识不足以满足临床服务的需求;兼职临床药师的职业定位不明确;临床药学实践缺乏职业自信心;开展药学服务工作没有合适的切入点;难以有效沟通,此外,针对当前的问题,提出了17种潜在的解决策略,可为临床药师兼职工作的开展提供参考。
    结论:兼职临床药师的工作目前还不成熟,这项研究得出的策略可能是解决兼职临床药学实践挑战的潜在解决方案。
    OBJECTIVE: To provide an initial understanding of problems and potential solution strategies for part-time clinical pharmacist work in China, and provide references for the training of part-time clinical pharmacists.
    METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in China, and the project lasted 6 months. Phenomenological methods were used to guide the research design. Research data were obtained by conducting one-to-one semistructured interviews with part-time clinical pharmacists, and interview data were coded and analysed through thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 21 pharmacists were interviewed in a semistructured manner, and the results showed that following problems exist in the work of part-time clinical pharmacists: the existing professional knowledge is not adequate to meet the demands of clinical service; the career orientation of part-time clinical pharmacists is not clear; lack of professional self-confidence in clinical pharmacy practice; there is no suitable entry point to carry out pharmacy service work; it is difficult to communicate effectively, and for in addition, 17 potential solution strategies are proposed for the current problems, which can provide reference for the development of part-time clinical pharmacists\' work.
    CONCLUSIONS: The work performed by part-time clinical pharmacists is currently immature and the strategies derived from this study may serve as potential solutions to resolve the part-time clinical pharmacy practice challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解甘肃省儿科超说明书用药的流行现状和费用,中国,以及潜在的影响因素。
    方法:根据《中国药品参考》(中国药品参考,MCDEX)数据库。处方的证据由现有的临床实践指南和Micromedex2021汇编中的Thomson等级确定。单因素回归分析后,我们使用logistic回归分析影响儿科超说明书用药的特征。
    方法:对甘肃省196家二级、三级医院门诊儿科处方进行多中心横断面研究,中国,2020年3月和9月。
    结果:我们检索了104029张儿科处方,其中39480(38.0%)包含标签外使用。使用非说明书药物治疗的最常见疾病是呼吸系统疾病(n=15831,占40.1%)。四分之一的标签外处方有足够的证据基础(n=10130,25.6%)。未经批准的适应症是最常见的标签外药物使用类型(n=25891,65.6%)。总共有1177种不同的药物被处方在标签外,多酶片剂是最常见的药物(n=1790,3.5%)。处方外药物的总费用为日元106116/天。三级医院的处方处方频率低于二级医院。与其他类型的药物相比,外用制剂更常被处方。高级临床医生比中级和初级临床医生更经常地开处方。
    结论:在中国儿科实践中,超说明书用药普遍存在。四分之三的处方可能包括不适当的药物使用,到2020年,甘肃省每天的经济负担约为81,000日元,人口为2500万。我国儿科超说明书用药管理有待改进
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the current prevalence and cost of paediatric off-label drug prescriptions in Gansu, China, and the potential influencing factors.
    METHODS: The prevalence of off-label prescriptions in paediatrics was evaluated according to the National Medical Products Administration drug instructions in the China Pharmaceutical Reference (China Pharmaceutical Reference, MCDEX) database. The evidence of the prescription was determined by existing clinical practice guidelines and the Thomson Grade in the Micromedex 2021 compendium. We used logistic regression to investigate the characteristics that influence paediatric off-label drug use after single-factor regression analysis.
    METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional study of outpatient paediatric prescriptions in 196 secondary and tertiary hospitals in Gansu Province, China, in March and September 2020.
    RESULTS: We retrieved 104 029 paediatric prescriptions, of which 39 480 (38.0%) contained off-label use. The most common diseases treated by off-label drugs were respiratory system diseases (n=15 831, 40.1%). A quarter of off-label prescriptions had adequate evidence basis (n=10 130, 25.6%). Unapproved indications were the most common type of off-label drug use (n=25 891, 65.6%). A total of 1177 different drugs were prescribed off-label, with multienzyme tablets being the most common drug (n=1790, 3.5%). The total cost of the prescribed off-label drugs was ¥106 116/day. Off-label prescriptions were less frequent in tertiary than in secondary hospitals. Topical preparations were more commonly prescribed off-label than other types of drugs. Senior-level clinicians prescribed drugs off-label more often than intermediate and junior clinicians.
    CONCLUSIONS: Off-label drug use is widespread in paediatric practice in China. Three-quarters of the prescriptions may potentially include inappropriate medication use, resulting in a daily economic burden of about ¥81 000 in 2020 in Gansu Province with 25 million inhabitants. The management of off-label drug use in paediatrics in China needs improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Upadacitinib是一种口服,选择性Janus激酶抑制剂。
    目的:评估upadacitinib在16周延长诱导治疗后对中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者的疗效和安全性,16周延长诱导治疗后达到临床缓解的患者的52周维持治疗方法:在两项诱导试验中,对8周upadacitinib45mg每日1次诱导治疗无临床缓解的患者可再接受8周治疗.在第16周达到临床反应的患者随后被重新随机(1:1)给予upadacitinib15或30mg,每天一次,用于52周维持治疗。在诱导第16周(综合)和维持第52周评估功效;自始至终评估安全性。
    结果:总体而言,127/663(19.2%)患者在第8周未达到对45mgupadacitinib的临床反应,并接受了另外8周的治疗;75/127(59.1%)随后在第16周达到临床反应,并进入维持试验。在第52周,26.5%的患者接受upadacitinib15mg,43.6%的人接受30毫克,达到临床缓解;两种剂量的所有其他终点均观察到疗效.与前8周相同人群相比,在诱导期间暴露于45mgupadacitinib的持续时间更长(16周),带状疱疹发病率增加。没有观察到其他新的安全信号,结果与奥帕替尼的已知安全性一致.
    结论:upadacitinib45mg诱导治疗8周后无临床反应的患者,可能受益于额外的8周的治疗。
    背景:NCT02819635;NCT03653026。
    Upadacitinib is an oral, selective Janus kinase inhibitor.
    To assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis following 16-week extended induction therapy, and 52-week maintenance therapy in patients achieving clinical response after 16-week extended induction therapy METHODS: Patients without clinical response to 8 weeks\' upadacitinib 45 mg once daily induction therapy in two induction trials were eligible for an additional 8 weeks of therapy. Patients achieving clinical response at Week 16 were subsequently re-randomised (1:1) to upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily for 52-week maintenance therapy. Efficacy was assessed at induction Week 16 (integrated) and maintenance Week 52; safety was assessed throughout.
    Overall, 127/663 (19.2%) patients did not achieve clinical response to upadacitinib 45 mg at Week 8 and received an additional 8 weeks of therapy; 75/127 (59.1%) subsequently achieved clinical response at Week 16 and entered the maintenance trial. At Week 52, 26.5% of patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, and 43.6% receiving 30 mg, achieved clinical remission; efficacy was observed across all other endpoints with both doses. Herpes zoster rates increased with longer duration (16 weeks) of exposure to upadacitinib 45 mg during induction compared with the same population during the first 8 weeks. No other new safety signals were observed, and results are otherwise consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib.
    Patients without clinical response after 8 weeks\' upadacitinib 45 mg induction therapy, may benefit from an additional 8 weeks of therapy.
    NCT02819635; NCT03653026.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不受控制的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者数量的增加需要有效的管理干预措施。然而,迄今为止的研究仅限于评估社区药剂师的结果。因此,本研究方案的目的是比较临床药师主导的干预策略在门诊2型糖尿病管理中的效果.
    方法:本研究将使用标准Cochrane方法学程序收集和分析数据。搜索符合条件的研究和正在进行的试验将使用PubMed进行,Embase,Medline(通过Ovid),EBSCO(通过Ovid),LippincottWilliams&Wilkins(LWW)期刊(通过奥维德),ProQuestHealthandMedicalComplete,和ClinicalTrials.gov(clinicaltrials.gov)从数据库开始到2023年12月。临床和健康结果将使用两种血糖控制相关指标进行测量(例如,糖化血红蛋白,空腹血糖,餐后葡萄糖)和一般指标(例如,坚持,疾病管理和与健康相关的生活质量)。荟萃分析将使用随机效应模型和采用贝叶斯分层模型的网络荟萃分析(NMA)进行成对荟萃分析。可视化和统计分析将使用RevMan进行,RStudio和ADDIS。此外,我们将通过使用建议评估等级来评估证据的确定性,开发和评估系统。
    背景:将没有来自NMA参与者的主要数据收集,并且没有正式的道德审查要求。我们的目标是在同行评审的科学杂志上展示NMA的结果,在会议上,在主流媒体中。
    CRD42022355368。
    The increase in the number of patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is in need of effective management interventions. However, research to date has been limited to the evaluation of the outcomes of community pharmacists alone. Therefore, the aim of the study protocol is to compare the effects of clinical pharmacist-led intervention strategies for the management of T2DM in the outpatient settings.
    The study will collect and analyse data applying standard Cochrane methodological procedures. A search for eligible studies and ongoing trials will be conducted using PubMed, Embase, Medline (via Ovid), EBSCO (via Ovid), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW) Journals (via Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medical Complete, and ClinicalTrials.gov (clinicaltrials.gov) from database inception to December 2023. Clinical and health outcomes will be measured using both glycaemic control related indicators (eg, glycated haemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose) and general indicators (eg, adherence, disease management and health-related quality of life). The meta-analysis will conduct pairwise meta-analysis using random effects models and network meta-analysis (NMA) employing the Bayesian hierarchical model. The visualisation and statistical analysis will be carried out using RevMan, R Studio and ADDIS. Additionally, we will evaluate the certainty of the evidence by using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.
    There will be no primary data collection from NMA participants, and there is no requirement for formal ethical review. Our aim is to present the results of this NMA in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, at conferences, and in the mainstream media.
    CRD42022355368.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内,鸟分枝杆菌复杂(MAC)肺病的负担正在增加,治疗结果普遍较差。治疗药物监测有可能通过确保适当的药物暴露来改善治疗结果。然而,关于MAC肺病的基于人群的研究非常有限。本研究旨在描述人群水平的关键抗分枝杆菌药物暴露的分布。并分析它们与MAC肺病患者治疗结果的关系。
    方法:将在上海肺科医院进行前瞻性队列研究,旨在纳入100名诊断为MAC肺病并接受治疗的成年患者。中国。将在1个月MAC治疗后收集血样用于测量大环内酯类,利福霉素,乙胺丁醇,阿米卡星和/或氟喹诺酮类药物,使用经过验证的液相色谱串联质谱法。将在包含时收集呼吸道样品,每3个月一次用于分枝杆菌培养,直到治疗完成。将使用商业肉汤微量稀释板进行最小抑制浓度(MIC)测定。除了分枝杆菌培养,将从肺功能的角度评估疾病的严重程度和临床改善,放射学表现和自我报告的生活质量。将对具有显著变化的MIC的任何纵向分离株进行全基因组测序,以探索赋予耐药性的突变的出现。将分析药物暴露与治疗结果之间的关系,并考虑潜在的混杂因素,以调整多变量模型。同时,将使用Cox比例风险或二元逻辑回归模型探索药物暴露与MIC和治疗反应标志物之间的关联,视情况而定。
    背景:本研究已获得上海市肺科医院伦理委员会的批准(编号:K22-149Z)。将获得所有参与者的书面和口头知情同意书。研究结果将提交给同行评审的期刊。
    背景:NCT05824988。
    The burden of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease is increasing globally and treatment outcome is in general poor. Therapeutic drug monitoring has the potential to improve treatment outcome by ensuring adequate drug exposure. However, very limited population-based studies exist for MAC lung disease. This study aims to describe the distribution of drug exposure for key antimycobacterial drugs at population level, and to analyse them in relationship to treatment outcome in patients with MAC lung disease.
    A prospective cohort aiming to include 100 adult patients diagnosed with and treated for MAC lung disease will be conducted in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, China. Blood samples will be collected after 1 month MAC treatment for measurement of macrolides, rifamycin, ethambutol, amikacin and/or fluoroquinolones, using a validated liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Respiratory samples will be collected at inclusion and once every 3 months for mycobacterial culture until treatment completion. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination will be performed using a commercial broth microdilution plate. In addition to mycobacterial culture, disease severity and clinical improvement will be assessed from the perspective of lung function, radiological presentation and self-reported quality of life. Whole genome sequencing will be performed for any longitudinal isolates with significant change of MIC to explore the emergence of drug resistance-conferring mutations. The relationship between drug exposure and treatment outcome will be analysed and potential confounders will be considered for adjustment in multivariable models. Meanwhile, the associations between drug exposure in relation to MIC and markers of treatment response will be explored using Cox proportional hazards or binary logistic regression models, as appropriate.
    This study has been approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (No. K22-149Z). Written and oral informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.
    NCT05824988.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨药物暴露和宿主种系遗传因素对阿帕替尼(APA)相关毒性的预测价值。
    方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,血浆APA浓度定量使用液相色谱-串联质谱,对126例接受每日250mgAPA治疗的晚期实体瘤患者的57种系突变进行基因分型,血管内皮生长因子受体II抑制剂。药物暴露之间的相关性,遗传因素,并对其毒性进行了分析。
    结果:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)更容易发生APA相关毒性,APA及其主要代谢产物M1-1的血浆浓度与高级别不良事件(AEs)(P<0.01;M1-1:P<0.01)和高级别抗血管生成毒性(APA:P=0.034;P<0.05)有关,包括高血压,蛋白尿和手足综合征,在NSCLC亚组中。此外,CYP2C9rs34532201TT携带者倾向于有较高水平的APA(P<0.001)和M1-1(P<0.01),而CYP2C9rs1936968GG携带者倾向于有较高水平的M1-1(P<0.01)。
    结论:血浆APA和M1-1暴露能够预测NSCLC患者的严重AE。CYP2C9rs34532201TT和rs1936968GG的NSCLC患者可能需要考虑剂量优化和药物暴露监测。意义声明阿帕替尼是一种用于治疗多种癌症的抗VEGFR2抑制剂。虽然有实质性的回应,阿帕替尼引起的毒性一直是值得临床监测的关键问题.关于药物暴露和遗传因素在阿帕替尼诱导的毒性中的作用的数据很少。我们的研究表明在NSCLC中存在明显的药物暴露关系,而不是其他肿瘤,并提供了药物暴露水平和单核苷酸多态性作为阿帕替尼诱导的严重毒性的预测生物标志物的宝贵证据。
    To investigate the value of drug exposure and host germline genetic factors in predicting apatinib (APA)-related toxicities.
    METHODS: In this prospective study, plasma APA concentrations were quantified using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and 57 germline mutations were genotyped in 126 advanced solid tumor patients receiving 250 mg daily APA, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor II inhibitor. The correlation between drug exposure, genetic factors, and the toxicity profile was analyzed.
    RESULTS: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was more prone to APA-related toxicities and plasma concentrations of APA, and its main metabolite M1-1 could be associated with high-grade adverse events (AEs) (P < 0.01; M1-1, P < 0.01) and high-grade antiangiogenetic toxicities (APA, P = 0.034; P < 0.05), including hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome, in the subgroup of NSCLC. Besides, CYP2C9 rs34532201 TT carriers tended to have higher levels of APA (P < 0.001) and M1-1 (P < 0.01), whereas CYP2C9 rs1936968 GG carriers were predisposed to higher levels of M1-1 (P < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Plasma APA and M1-1 exposures were able to predict severe AEs in NSCLC patients. Dose optimization and drug exposure monitoring might need consideration in NSCLC patients with CYP2C9 rs34532201 TT and rs1936968 GG.
    CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib is an anti-VEGFR2 inhibitor for the treatment of multiple cancers. Though substantial in response, apatinib-induced toxicity has been a critical issue that is worth clinical surveillance. Few data on the role of drug exposure and genetic factors in apatinib-induced toxicity are available. Our study demonstrated a distinct drug-exposure relationship in NSCLC but not other tumors and provided invaluable evidence of drug exposure levels and single nucleotide polymorphisms as predictive biomarkers in apatinib-induced severe toxicities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在对与BCR::ABL抑制剂相关的液体潴留相关不良事件(AE)进行全面分析。
    方法:回顾性药物警戒研究。
    方法:从2004年1月1日至2021年9月30日检索BCR::ABL抑制剂的食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库。
    方法:使用报告OR(ROR)和95%CI检测信号。通过将目标药物的液体潴留事件报告的几率除以所有其他药物的液体潴留事件报告的几率来计算ROR。如果ROR的95%CI的下限>1,则该信号被认为是阳性的。仅考虑结合的流体滞留事件/BCR::ABL抑制剂与至少三个病例进行分析。
    结果:FAERS共发现97823份报告。伊马替尼的体液潴留信号最多,其次是达沙替尼和尼罗替尼,而博舒替尼和普纳替尼的信号较少。眶周水肿(ROR=24.931,95%CI22.404至27.743),乳糜胸(ROR=161.427,95%CI125.835至207.085),乳头肿胀(ROR=48.796,95%CI26.270至90.636),乳糜胸(ROR=35.798,95%CI14.791至86.642)和胆囊水肿(ROR=77.996,95%CI38.286至158.893)是伊马替尼检测到的最强信号,达沙替尼,尼洛替尼,博舒替尼和普纳替尼,分别。胸腔积液,所有BCR均检测到心包积液和肺水肿::ABL抑制剂,达沙替尼治疗胸腔积液的ROR最高(ROR=37.424,95%CI35.715~39.216),心包积液(ROR=14.146,95%CI12.649~15.819)和肺水肿(ROR=11.217,95%CI10.303~12.213)。年龄≥65岁的患者使用达沙替尼,伊马替尼,尼洛替尼或博舒替尼对胸腔积液的ROR较高,心包积液和肺水肿。年龄≥65岁的患者和使用伊马替尼的女性对眶周水肿的ROR较高,全身水肿和面部水肿。
    结论:这项药物警戒研究作为临床提醒,医生要更加警惕BCR::ABL抑制剂引起的液体潴留相关不良事件。
    This study aimed to conduct a thorough analysis of fluid retention-associated adverse events (AEs) associated with BCR::ABL inhibitors.
    A retrospective pharmacovigilance study.
    Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for BCR::ABL inhibitors was searched from 1 January 2004 to 30 September 2021.
    Reporting OR (ROR) and 95% CI were used to detect the signals. ROR was calculated by dividing the odds of fluid retention event reporting for the target drug by the odds of fluid retention event reporting for all other drugs. The signal was considered positive if the lower limit of 95% CI of ROR was >1. The analysis was run only considering coupled fluid retention events/BCR::ABL inhibitors with at least three cases.
    A total of 97 823 reports were identified in FAERS. Imatinib had the most fluid retention signals, followed by dasatinib and nilotinib, while bosutinib and ponatinib had fewer signals. Periorbital oedema (ROR=24.931, 95% CI 22.404 to 27.743), chylothorax (ROR=161.427, 95% CI 125.835 to 207.085), nipple swelling (ROR=48.796, 95% CI 26.270 to 90.636), chylothorax (ROR=35.798, 95% CI 14.791 to 86.642) and gallbladder oedema (ROR=77.996, 95% CI 38.286 to 158.893) were the strongest signals detected for imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib, respectively. Pleural effusion, pericardial effusion and pulmonary oedema were detected for all BCR::ABL inhibitors, with dasatinib having the highest RORs for pleural effusion (ROR=37.424, 95% CI 35.715 to 39.216), pericardial effusion (ROR=14.146, 95% CI 12.649 to 15.819) and pulmonary oedema (ROR=11.217, 95% CI 10.303 to 12.213). Patients aged ≥65 years using dasatinib, imatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib had higher RORs for pleural effusion, pericardial effusion and pulmonary oedema. Patients aged ≥65 years and females using imatinib had higher RORs for periorbital oedema, generalised oedema and face oedema.
    This pharmacovigilance study serves as a clinical reminder to physicians to be more vigilant for fluid retention-associated AEs with BCR::ABL inhibitors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经证明,经神经途径使用地塞米松可延长周围神经阻滞(PNB)的镇痛持续时间,但其最佳剂量仍不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定神经周地塞米松在延长PNB镇痛中的最佳剂量。
    方法:PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane中央受控试验登记册和WebofScience将从其开始至2023年3月1日进行搜索。语言将仅限于英语。将包括比较成人患者中不同剂量的神经周地塞米松对PNB的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。回顾性研究,reviews,荟萃分析,病例报告,会议摘要,有关儿科手术的评论和研究将被排除.镇痛的持续时间将被定义为主要结果。次要结果将包括疼痛评分,超过48小时的总镇痛需求和不良反应的发生率。两名评审员将独立进行研究选择,数据提取和质量评估。使用RevManV.5.3软件进行数据分析。证据质量将使用推荐标准进行评估,评估,开发和评估(等级)方法。
    背景:不需要道德批准。这项研究的结果将提交给同行评审的期刊。
    CRD42022385672。
    BACKGROUND: Perineural use of dexamethasone is demonstrated to extend the analgesia duration of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB), but its optimal dose remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the optimal dose of perineural dexamethasone in the prolongation of analgesia for PNB.
    METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science will be searched from their inception to 1 March 2023. Language will be restricted to English. Randomised controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of different doses of perineural dexamethasone for PNB in adult patients will be included. Retrospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, conference abstracts, comments and studies regarding paediatric surgeries will be excluded. The duration of analgesia will be defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include pain scores, the total analgesic requirement over 48 hours and the incidence of adverse effects. Two reviewers will independently perform the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. RevMan V.5.3 software will be used for data analysis. The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
    BACKGROUND: No ethical approval is required. The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42022385672.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:评价抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)治疗近视脉络膜新生血管(CNV)的疗效和安全性。并比较两种不同抗VEGF再治疗标准的疗效。
    方法:PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov从成立到2022年7月31日进行了搜索。
    方法:比较抗VEGF与假手术,光动力疗法(PDT)或PDT联合疗法对近视CNV患者进行了回顾和选择。将视敏度(VA)稳定或疾病活动作为抗VEGF再治疗标准的RCT也包括在研究中。
    方法:两名评审员独立进行数据提取和质量评估。我们对所有分析都使用了随机效应模型。主要结果包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中央凹厚度。次要结局包括获得BCVA三行以上的患者人数,抗VEGF注射次数和眼部不良事件(AE)。
    结果:纳入7个RCTs,涉及1007例患者。与假手术和PDT治疗相比,抗VEGF治疗获得了更好的BCVA增益-0.28logMAR(95%CI-0.36至-0.20,p<0.00001)和-0.14logMAR(95%CI-0.17至-0.10,p<0.00001),分别。雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗均比PDT治疗更好地改善患者的视力,并且未观察到明确的眼部AE风险增加。对两个小型随机对照试验的分析表明,与抗VEGF单药治疗相比,PDT联合治疗具有相似的视觉改善,并且需要更少的抗VEGF注射(加权平均差(WMD)=1.30;95%CI1.24至1.37,p<0.00001)。与VA稳定性指导的再治疗相比,疾病活动标准指导的抗VEGF再治疗可产生相当的视觉改善和减少的抗VEGF注射(WMD=0.83;95%CI0.42至1.25,p<0.0001)。
    结论:抗VEGF治疗对近视CNV患者有效且耐受性良好。由疾病活动标准指导的抗VEGF再治疗可以实现相当的功效并潜在地减少抗VEGF注射。
    CRD42021292806。
    To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for myopia choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), and to compare the efficacy of two different anti-VEGF retreatment criteria.
    PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 31 July 2022.
    Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGF with sham, photodynamic therapy (PDT) or PDT combination therapy in patients with myopia CNV were reviewed and selected. RCTs comparing visual acuity (VA) stabilisation or disease activity as anti-VEGF retreatment criteria were also included in the study.
    Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction and quality assessment. We used a random-effects model for all analyses. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness. Secondary outcomes included number of patients who gained more than three lines in BCVA, number of anti-VEGF injections and ocular adverse event (AE).
    Seven RCTs involving 1007 patients were included. Compared with sham and PDT therapy, anti-VEGF therapy achieved better BCVA gains of -0.28 logMAR (95% CI -0.36 to -0.20, p<0.00001) and -0.14 logMAR (95% CI -0.17 to -0.10, p<0.00001), respectively. Both ranibizumab and bevacizumab improved patients\' vision better than PDT therapy and no definitive increased risk of ocular AE was observed. Analysis of two small RCTs showed that PDT combination therapy had similar visual improvement and needed fewer anti-VEGF injections compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy (weighted mean difference (WMD)=1.30; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.37, p<0.00001). Anti-VEGF retreatment guided by disease activity criteria resulted in comparable visual improvement and reduced anti-VEGF injections compared with retreatment guided by VA stabilisation (WMD=0.83; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.25, p<0.0001).
    Anti-VEGF therapy is effective and well-tolerated for myopia CNV patients. Anti-VEGF retreatment guided by disease activity criteria can achieve comparable efficacy and potentially reduce anti-VEGF injections.
    CRD42021292806.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号