CCCA

CCCA
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中央离心瘢痕性脱发(CCCA)命名法描述了瘢痕性脱发的典型临床表现,始于顶点头皮,对称,和离心演化。然而,作者在临床上注意到了非典型表现,并在文献中进行了报道.
    目的:我们试图描述已发表的CCCA成年患者脱发的分布特征。
    方法:使用三步搜索过程来评估CINAHL中的研究文章,EMBASE,谷歌学者,MEDLINE,Scopus,和WebofScience数据库。包括头皮摄影或脱发分布描述的研究。三名研究人员评估了符合条件的临床亚型研究。PRISMA扩展范围审查(PRISMA-ScR)用于报告结果。
    结果:纳入了由281例CCCA组成的99项研究。脱发分布包括经典演示文稿的变体以及不同的亚型,如斑驳,枕骨,顶叶,额叶,temporal,和trichorrhexis。
    结论:研究具有显著的同质性,正如CCCA的经典分布被普遍报道。此外,临床诊断病例可能有并发诊断,和许多研究没有报告的结果。
    结论:CCCA术语可能并不总是反映临床表现。了解非典型表现对于告知适当和有针对性的治疗至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) nomenclature describes a typical clinical presentation of cicatricial hair loss that begins on the vertex scalp with progressive, symmetric, and centrifugal evolution. However, atypical presentations have been noted clinically by the authors and reported in the literature.
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the distribution of hair loss in published cases of adult patients with CCCA.
    METHODS: A 3-step search process was used to evaluate research articles in Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies with scalp photography or description of hair loss distribution were included. Three researchers evaluated eligible studies for clinical subtypes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review was used to report results.
    RESULTS: Ninety-nine studies consisting of 281 cases of CCCA were included. Hair loss distributions included variants of the classic presentation along with distinct subtypes such as patchy, occipital, parietal, frontal, temporal, and trichorrhexis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Studies had significant homogeneity, as the classic distribution of CCCA was commonly reported. Additionally, clinically diagnosed cases may have concurrent diagnoses, and numerous studies did not report trichoscopy findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: CCCA terminology may not always be reflective of clinical presentation. Understanding atypical presentations is essential to inform appropriate and targeted treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中央离心性瘢痕性脱发(CCCA)是多因素病因的瘢痕性脱发,在顶点上表现为脱发的斑片状区域,离心地散布在头皮上.它最常见的影响非洲裔妇女,但其他种族的病例也有报道。CCCA通常从头发变薄和断裂开始,作为演示的第一个标志,最终进展到头皮中央部分的脱发,对称地向外传播以涉及更大的区域。目前,这种疾病没有明确的治疗方法;然而,多个管理选项可用,这应该旨在为个体患者量身定做。由于其外观效果,中心性离心性瘢痕性脱发患者的生活质量(QoL)也受到干扰,因为患者可能会因为永久性脱发而面临心理和社会压力。本文重点介绍了发病机制的各个方面,临床试验,生活质量,患者面临的障碍,治疗中心性离心瘢痕性脱发。
    Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) is a scarring alopecia of multifactorial etiology that presents on the vertex as patchy areas of hair loss, spreading centrifugally over the scalp. It most commonly affects women of African descent, but cases among other ethnicities have also been reported. CCCA typically starts with thinning and breaking of the hair as the first sign of presentation, which eventually progresses to hair loss over the central part of the scalp, spreading symmetrically outwards to involve a larger area. Currently, there is no definitive cure for the disease; however, multiple management options are available, which should aim to be tailored to the individual patient. Owing to its cosmetic outcomes, the quality of life (QoL) of patients with central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia is also disturbed, as patients may face psychological and social stress due to their permanent hair loss. This article focuses on various aspects of the pathogenesis, clinical trials, quality of life, barriers faced by patients, and treatment of central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    振动光谱学能够深入了解分子的结构和动态特性。目前,光谱学的大多数理论方法都采用基于波函数的从头算或依赖于谐波近似的密度泛函方法。对于具有强烈非谐键的大分子或具有大的核间分离的分子,这种近似分解。这些方法的替代方法包括生成分子非谐势能面(电势)并使用它们来推断振动频率。这项研究考察了密度泛函理论(DFT)和相关一致复合方法(ccCA)在从小主族分子的电势产生非谐波频率方面的功效。振动自洽场论(VSCF)和后VSCF方法用于根据这些分子的电势计算它们的基本频率。功能选择,基集选择,和模式耦合也被视为影响精度的因素。使用理论的ccCA水平的电势计算的频率的绝对偏差低于DFT水平的电势。DFT导致的弯曲模式比ccCA更好地描述,多水平DFT:ccCA方法,其中DFT电势用于单振动模式电势,并且ccCA用于振动模式-模式耦合,可以用于更大的多原子系统。使用VCIPSI-PT2的这种多级方法获得的频率比缩放谐波频率更接近实验频率,表明成功利用后VSCF方法来生成更准确的计算红外光谱表示。
    Vibrational spectroscopy enables critical insight into the structural and dynamic properties of molecules. Presently, the majority of theoretical approaches to spectroscopy employ wavefunction-based ab initio or density functional methods that rely on the harmonic approximation. This approximation breaks down for large molecules with strongly anharmonic bonds or for molecules with large internuclear separations. An alternative to these methods involves generating molecular anharmonic potential energy surfaces (potentials) and using them to extrapolate the vibrational frequencies. This study examines the efficacy of density functional theory (DFT) and the correlation consistent Composite Approach (ccCA) in generating anharmonic frequencies from potentials of small main group molecules. Vibrational self-consistent field Theory (VSCF) and post-VSCF methods were used to calculate the fundamental frequencies of these molecules from their potentials. Functional choice, basis set selection, and mode-coupling are also examined as factors in influencing accuracy. The absolute deviations for the calculated frequencies using potentials at the ccCA level of theory were lower than the potentials at the DFT level. With DFT resulting in bending modes that are better described than those of ccCA, a multilevel DFT:ccCA approach where DFT potentials are used for single vibrational mode potentials and ccCA is used for vibrational mode-mode couplings can be utilized for larger polyatomic systems. The frequencies obtained with this multilevel approach using VCIPSI-PT2 were closer to experimental frequencies than the scaled harmonic frequencies, indicating the success of utilizing post-VSCF methods to generate more accurate representations of computed infrared spectra.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前尚无治疗中心性离心瘢痕性脱发(CCCA)的既定护理标准,治疗方法差异很大。
    目的:就使用各种药物治疗CCCA成人达成共识。
    方法:我们邀请了27位在头发和头皮疾病方面具有专业知识的皮肤科医生参加了2023年1月至3月之间的3轮改良Delphi研究。如果75%的受访者同意或不同意,则声明会达成强烈共识。如果55%或更多但不到75%同意或不同意,则声明达到中等共识。
    结果:在第1轮中,33个陈述中的第5个(15.2%)达成了强烈共识,其次是第二轮28人中的9人(32.1%)。在最后的第3轮会议之后,70份总体声明中有20份(28.6%)达成了强烈共识。两个声明达成了适度的共识。
    结论:这项研究仅包括讲英语的人,美国皮肤科医生,不考虑非药物治疗。
    结论:尽管皮肤科医生意见不一,就帮助临床医师管理CCCA的若干声明达成共识.我们还强调缺乏专家共识的领域,以推进CCCA的研究和治疗方案为目标。
    BACKGROUND: There is no established standard of care for treating central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA), and treatment approaches vary widely.
    OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus statements regarding the use of various pharmacological therapies in treating adults with CCCA.
    METHODS: We invited 27 dermatologists with expertise in hair and scalp disorders to participate in a 3-round modified Delphi study between January and March 2023. Statements met strong consensus if 75% of respondents agreed or disagreed. Statements met moderate consensus if 55% or more but less than 75% agreed or disagreed.
    RESULTS: In round 1, 5 of 33 (15.2%) statements met strong consensus, followed by 9 of 28 (32.1%) in round 2. After the final round 3 meeting, strong consensus was reached for 20 of 70 (28.6%) overall statements. Two statements achieved moderate consensus.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study included only English-speaking, US-based dermatologists and did not consider nonpharmacological therapies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite varying opinions among dermatologists, consensus was reached for several statements to help clinicians manage CCCA. We also highlight areas that lack expert consensus with the goal of advancing research and therapeutic options for CCCA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中央离心瘢痕性脱发(CCCA)是一种瘢痕性脱发,主要见于非洲裔女性,但很少见于男性。CCCA的病因不明,但是遗传变异,II型糖尿病(T2DM),1-3目标:我们旨在表征人口统计学,病史,以及男性CCCA患者的临床表现,假设其特征可能与女性不同。
    方法:这是2012年至2022年在皮肤科就诊的经活检证实的CCCA成年男性患者的病例系列。
    结果:总计,17名男性进行了头皮活检,临床表现与CCCA一致。平均年龄43岁,88.2%的病例被确定为黑人。头皮瘙痒是最常见的症状,很少有患者支持高风险的护发实践。所有病例均未诊断为T2DM,但17.6%有潜伏性结核病史,47.1%有脱发家族史。我们观察到8例非典型CCCA患者,29.4%的患者有重叠的头皮诊断。
    结论:这项研究受到单中心的限制,回顾性设计和小样本量。
    结论:在成年黑人男性脱发的鉴别诊断中考虑CCCA非常重要。
    Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) is a scarring alopecia seen primarily in women of African descent but rarely reported in men. The etiology of CCCA is unknown, but genetic variants, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and bacterial infections may play a role.
    We aimed to characterize the demographics, medical histories, and clinical findings of male patients with CCCA with the hypothesis that features may differ from women.
    This was a case series of adult male patients with biopsy-confirmed CCCA seen at an academic dermatology department between 2012 and 2022.
    In total, 17 males had a scalp biopsy and clinical findings consistent with CCCA. The average age was 43 years, and 88.2% of cases identified as Black race. Scalp pruritus was the most common symptom, and few patients endorsed high-risk hair care practices. None of the cases had diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, but 17.6% had history of latent tuberculosis, and 47.1% had a positive family history of alopecia. We observed 8 patients with atypical CCCA, and 29.4% had an overlapping scalp diagnosis.
    This study is limited by the single center, retrospective design and small sample size.
    It is important to consider CCCA in the differential diagnosis of alopecia in adult Black males.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号