Breasts

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开发具有优异的单向汗液输送能力的Janus织物是在运动期间提供舒适感和保护健康的有吸引力的方式。在这项工作中,首先提出了3D润湿梯度Janus织物(3DWGJF),以解决女性乳房汗液积聚过多的问题,然后与海绵垫集成,形成3D润湿梯度Janus运动胸罩(3DWGJSB)。3D润湿梯度使制备的织物能够以单向模式(x/y方向)控制汗液的水平迁移,然后单向向下(z方向)渗透,最终将3DWGJF(皮肤侧)内侧的含水量保持在约0%。此外,制备的3DWGJF具有良好的水蒸气透过率(WVTR:0.0409gcm-2h-1)和优异的水分蒸发率(0.4704gh-1)。由于转移印花对织物的高附着力及其优异的机械性能,3dwgjf是非常耐用和能够承受超过500洗涤周期和400磨损周期。这项工作可能会激发下一代水分管理面料的设计和制造,具有有效的排汗功能,为女性的健康。
    Developing Janus fabrics with excellent one-way sweat transport capacity is an attractive way for providing comfort sensation and protecting the health during exercise. In this work, a 3D wetting gradient Janus fabric (3DWGJF) is first proposed to address the issue of excessive sweat accumulation in women\'s breasts, followed by integration with a sponge pad to form a 3D wetting gradient Janus sports bra (3DWGJSB). The 3D wetting gradient enables the prepared fabric to control the horizontal migration of sweat in one-way mode (x/y directions) and then unidirectionally penetrate downward (z direction), finally keeping the water content on the inner side of 3DWGJF (skin side) at ≈0%. In addition, the prepared 3DWGJF has good water vapor transmittance rate (WVTR: 0.0409 g cm-2 h-1) and an excellent water evaporation rate (0.4704 g h-1). Due to the high adhesion of transfer prints to the fabrics and their excellent mechanical properties, the 3DWGJF is remarkably durable and capable of withstanding over 500 laundering cycles and 400 abrasion cycles. This work may inspire the design and fabrication of next-generation moisture management fabrics with an effective sweat-removal function for women\'s health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺乏研究不同人口群体之间偏好差异的文献。这项研究旨在评估根据自我识别的人口统计学因素分层的受访者对理想乳房的看法有何不同。收集了来自高级外科医生诊所的25名接受乳房手术的患者。这些患者的术前前后照片通过Qualtrics分发(西雅图,WA)到一个大样本,旨在代表美国的人口统计。调查问题旨在衡量受访者对“乳房吸引力”的印象。受访者被要求用李克特量表对乳房进行评分。调查回应分析了不同性别的乳房美学偏好差异,性别,性取向,和种族。男性在李克特量表上对所有乳房的吸引力评分高于女性(2.8vs2.5,p<0.001)。尽管有这种差异,男性和女性受访者的评分高度相关(R=0.940;p<0.0001)。考虑到性取向,与仅被男性吸引的个体相比,被女性吸引的个体对所有乳房的吸引力评分明显更高(2.8vs2.5,p<0.001).白人或白种人的乳房吸引力评分明显高于亚洲人(2.7vs2.2,p<0.001),但不是黑人或非裔美国人(2.7vs2.4,p=0.23)。尽管平均乳房吸引力存在种族差异,三组之间的评分高度相关。在美国的样本代表中,通过人口统计学因素观察到乳房美学评价的差异。这些发现值得进一步调查以了解这些趋势和观察。
    There is a paucity of literature examining how preferences differ amongst various demographic groups. This study aimed to assess how perceptions of the ideal breast differ between respondents stratified by self-identified demographic factors. A cohort of 25 patients from the senior surgeon\'s practice presenting for breast surgery was assembled. Pre-operative anteroposterior photographs of these patients were distributed via Qualtrics (Seattle, WA) to a large sample designed to be representative of the demographics of the United States. Survey questions aimed to measure respondents\' impressions of \'breast attractiveness\'. Respondents were asked to rate breasts on a Likert scale. Survey responses were analysed for differences in breast aesthetic preferences by sex, gender, sexual orientation, and race. Males rated all breasts higher on the Likert scale for attractiveness than females (2.8 vs 2.5, p < 0.001). Despite this discrepancy, ratings amongst male and female respondents were highly correlated with one another (R = 0.940; p < 0.0001). Considering sexual orientation, individuals attracted to women provided significantly higher attractiveness ratings to all breasts compared to individuals attracted to men only (2.8 vs 2.5, p < 0.001). White or Caucasian individuals ascribed significantly higher breast attractiveness ratings than Asian individuals (2.7 vs 2.2, p < 0.001), but not Black or African American individuals (2.7 vs 2.4, p = 0.23). Despite these racial discrepancies in mean breast attractiveness, ratings amongst the three groups were highly correlated. In a sample representative of the United States, a difference in breast aesthetic appraisal was observed by demographic factors. These findings merit further investigation to understand these trends and observations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乳腺囊肿包括多种病理,良性和恶性。因此,将囊肿分为不同的类别是需要开发一种管理算法。这项研究旨在描述和区分简单的,复杂和复杂的囊肿;并将最终的BIRADS评估与病理结果进行比较。
    对我们的超声数据库进行了为期5年的回顾性审查,确定了二百七十例乳腺囊性病变患者。它们分为简单的,根据基于形状的超声特征,复杂和复杂的囊肿,定位,margin,壁厚,内部特征(回声,隔片,质量)后部声学特征,周围组织血管。最终的BIRADS评估与组织学发现相关。
    共有66名女性(98.5%)和4名男性(1.5%),平均年龄为34.9±11.8岁。最常见的表现是明显的肿块,70%的患者。有89个(33.0%)简单囊肿,61个(22.6%)复杂囊肿和120个(44.4%)复杂囊肿。
    大多数乳腺囊肿(83%)是良性的,总的恶性肿瘤发生率为17%。复杂囊肿是我们研究中最常见的囊肿类型,它也是最常见的与乳腺癌相关的类别,消除组织学的需要。
    UNASSIGNED: Breast cysts encompass a variety of pathologies, both benign and malignant. Therefore, classifying cysts into different categories is needful to develop a management algorithm. This study aimed to describe and distinguish between simple, complicated and complex cysts; and compare the final BIRADS assessment with pathologic findings.
    UNASSIGNED: A 5-year retrospective review of our ultrasound database identified two hundred and seventy patients with cystic breast lesions. They were divided into simple, complicated and complex cysts according to ultrasound characteristics based on shape, orientation, margin, wall thickness, internal features (echogenicity, septa, mass) posterior acoustic features, surrounding tissue vascularity. The final BIRADS assessment was correlated with histological findings.
    UNASSIGNED: There were two hundred and sixty-six (98.5%) females and four (1.5%) males with a mean age 34.9 ± 11.8 years. The commonest presentation was a palpable mass, in 70% of the patients. There were 89 (33.0%) simple cysts, 61 (22.6%) complicated cysts and 120 (44.4%) complex cysts.
    UNASSIGNED: Majority of the breast cysts (83%) were benign with overall 17% incidence of malignancy. Complex cysts were the most frequent cyst type in our study, it is also the category most frequently associated with breast cancer, obviating the need for histology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是一篇关于乳房的个人文章。它专注于我年轻时的经历,从青春期到家族有乳腺癌史,包括我母亲的乳腺癌诊断。作为一名医生,病人,和妻子,我思考我必须做出的选择,以及这对我作为一个女人和母亲的身份意味着什么。
    This is a personal essay about breasts. It focuses on my experiences as a young girl, moving through adolescence to a history of breast cancer in my family, including my mother\'s breast cancer diagnosis. As a physician, patient, and wife, I reflect on the choices that I have to make and what this means for my identity as a woman and mother.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用BI-RADS分析ABUS的BE,并结合乳腺密度和临床特征进行改良分类。
    方法:绝经状态,奇偶校验,我们收集了496名接受ABUS和乳房X线照相术的女性的乳腺癌家族史.三名放射科医生独立检查了所有ABUSBE和乳房X线摄影密度。包括卡帕统计(κ)在内的统计分析,用于观察者之间的协议,费希尔的精确检验,并进行了单变量和多变量多项逻辑回归。
    结果:两种分类之间以及每种分类之间的BE分布与乳腺摄影密度相关(P<0.001)。BI-RADS均匀-纤维腺体(76.8%)和修饰的异质BE(71.3%,75.7%,87.5%的轻度,中度,和明显的异质背景回声结构,分别)倾向于密集。BE在BI-RADS均质脂肪和改良均质背景(95.1%)之间以及BI-RADS均质纤维腺体或异质(90.6%)与改良异质(86.9%)之间相关(P<0.001)。在多项逻辑回归中,年龄<50岁与异质性BE(OR,8.89,P=0.003,在BI-RADS中;或,3.74;修改后的分类中P=0.020)。
    结论:ABUS上的BI-RADS均质脂肪和改良均质BE可能是乳房X线检查的脂肪。然而,BI-RADS均质-纤维腺体或异质BE可归类为任何修饰的BE。年龄较小与异质性BE独立相关。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze BE on ABUS using BI-RADS and a modified classification in association with mammographic density and clinical features.
    METHODS: Menopausal status, parity, and family history of breast cancer were collected for 496 women who underwent ABUS and mammography. Three radiologists independently reviewed all ABUS BE and mammographic density. Statistical analyses including kappa statistics (κ) for interobserver agreement, Fisher\'s exact test, and univariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regression were performed.
    RESULTS: BE distribution between the two classifications and between each classification and mammographic density were associated (P < 0.001). BI-RADS homogeneous-fibroglandular (76.8%) and modified heterogeneous BE (71.3%, 75.7%, and 87.5% of mild, moderate, and marked heterogeneous background echotexture, respectively) tended to be dense. BE was correlated between BI-RADS homogeneous-fat and modified homogeneous background (95.1%) and between BI-RADS homogeneous-fibroglandular or heterogeneous (90.6%) and modified heterogeneous (86.9%) (P < 0.001). In multinomial logistic regression, age < 50 years was independently associated with heterogeneous BE (OR, 8.89, P = 0.003, in BI-RADS; OR, 3.74; P = 0.020 in modified classification).
    CONCLUSIONS: BI-RADS homogeneous-fat and modified homogeneous BE on ABUS was likely to be mammographically fatty. However, BI-RADS homogeneous-fibroglandular or heterogeneous BE might be classified as any modified BE. Younger age was independently associated with heterogeneous BE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    现有的衡量女性胸部体验的方法主要集中在负面体验上,这使女性的意义和与乳房的关系变得不中心。为了纠正这一点,我们开发了一种新的衡量女性积极胸部体验的方法,乳房欣赏量表(BrAS),并在四项研究中检查了这种新颖测量的心理测量特性。研究1,307名英国女性,导致提取了9个项目,BrAS评分的一维模型显示出足够的复合可靠性和4周测试-重测可靠性。研究2,297名英国女性,表明BrAS分数的一维模型具有足够的拟合性和收敛性,并发,判别式,和增量有效性。研究3,来自英国的295名女性,为阶乘有效性和并发有效性提供了额外的支持,此外,还提供了已知群体有效性的证据,因为母亲比非母亲更欣赏乳房。研究4表明,澳大利亚女性的BrAS是标量不变的,联合王国,和美国(N=573),并提供了同时有效的额外证据。基于这些结果,我们得出的结论是,Bras是女性积极的乳房体验的心理有效测量,可以在未来的研究中使用。
    Existing measures of women\'s breasted experiences have focused on negative experiences, which de-centres women\'s meaning-making and relationships with their breasts. To rectify this, we developed a novel measure of women\'s positive breasted experiences, the Breast Appreciation Scale (BrAS), and examined the psychometric properties of this novel measure across four studies. Study 1, with 307 United Kingdom women, led to the extraction of a 9-item, unidimensional model of BrAS scores that showed adequate composite reliability and 4-week test-retest reliability. Study 2, with 297 United Kingdom women, showed that the unidimensional model of BrAS scores had adequate fit and evidenced convergent, concurrent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Study 3, with 295 women from the United Kingdom, provided additional support for factorial validity and concurrent validity, and additionally provided evidence of known-groups validity insofar as mothers had greater breast appreciation than non-mothers. Study 4 showed that the BrAS was scalar invariant across women from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States (N = 573) and provided additional evidence of concurrent validity. Based on these results, we conclude that the BrAS is a psychometrically valid measure of women\'s positive breasted experiences that can be utilised in future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    女性乳房暴露于散射辐射,无论在头部CT期间不包括在原野中。这项研究旨在研究在头部CT期间使用铅屏蔽是否有利于减少乳房的剂量。
    这项研究是在两家不同的医院在两个不同的CT单元上进行的,包括120名患者。一半的测量(n=60)在不使用铅屏蔽的情况下进行,另一半(n=60)在使用0.5mm等效厚度的铅屏蔽的情况下进行。
    在使用铅屏蔽的两家医院中,发现头部CT期间乳房的皮肤剂量显着减少;A医院为81%(338.2±43.7μGy至64.3±18.8μGy),B医院为74%(从253.1±35.1μGy至65.3±16.9μGy)。
    考虑到低剂量辐射的假定致癌作用,头部CT扫描的高频率和对高度辐射敏感的乳房的辐射剂量显着减少,使用铅屏蔽是非常值得推荐的。
    Female breasts are exposed to scattered radiation regardless of not being included in the primary field during head CT. This study aimed to investigate whether the use of lead shielding is beneficial in dose reduction to the breasts during head CT.
    The study was performed in two different hospitals on two different CT units and included 120 patients. Half of the measurements (n = 60) was conducted without the use of lead shielding and the other half (n = 60) with the use of lead shielding of 0.5 mm equivalent thickness.
    Significant skin dose reduction to the breasts during head CT in both hospitals with the use of lead shielding was discovered; 81% (338.2 ± 43.7 μGy to 64.3 ± 18.8 μGy) in Hospital A and 74% (from 253.1 ± 35.1 μGy to 65.3 ± 16.9 μGy) in Hospital B.
    Considering the assumed carcinogenic effect of low doses of radiation, high frequency of the head CT scans and the significant reduction of radiation doses to the highly radiosensitive breasts, the use of lead shielding is highly recommendable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: With the increasing incidence of breast cancer in young women, its side effects have extended into the sexual lives of women. However, an appropriate tool to measure the sexual function is nonexistent. The aim of this study was to develop a suitable tool to measure sexual function in women with breast cancer.
    METHODS: After conducting literature reviews regarding the sexual function characteristics of women with breast cancer, this study designed a set of integrated sexual function questionnaires, which included pertinent information and three scales. The validity of the scales was examined under the guidance of three gender studies experts and two gynecologists who are also professors. Regarding the construct validity, researchers conducted exploratory factor analysis on the measurement results of 196 women with breast cancer.
    RESULTS: The integrated sexual function questionnaires included the following three scales: \"Breasts\' Role Self-Checklist,\" \"Scales for Breasts\' Role in the Foreplay,\" and \"Female Sexual Function Scale for BCSs.\" The questionnaire tool consisted of the longitudinal time change, patients\' and their partners\' situation, information related to the recovery process, participants\' perspective toward objectification of women\'s breasts, the role of breasts in foreplay during sexual activities, sexual desire, sexual satisfaction, sexual obstacle, and other self-evaluations. We first derived one factor from six questions in \"Breasts\' Role Self-Checklist\" and named it as \"The Importance of Breasts for Women.\" The other two factors were obtained from eight questions in \"Scales for Breasts\' Role in the Foreplay\" and named as \"Sexual Attraction to Breasts\" and \"Function of Breasts in Foreplay.\" In addition, three factors were derived from 16 questions in \"Female Sexual Function Scale for BCSs\" and named as \"Sexual Desire,\" \"Sexual Satisfaction,\" and \"Sexual Obstacle.\"
    CONCLUSIONS: This study determined that these integrated scales for breast cancer survivors are suitable due to their content validity, construct validity, and high internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach\'s alpha of higher than 0.9 for all the three scales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Breast reshaping or mastopexy following massive weight loss can be challenging. The LOPOSAM (lower pole subglandular advancement mastoplasty) technique has shown promising results for correction of ptotic, wide, lateralized and deflated breasts following massive weight loss.
    We compared the LOPOSAM technique to the mastopexy technique after massive weight loss described by Rubin JP, in a randomized trial. The main outcome measure was the total operative time. Secondary outcomes measures were socio-economic factors; length of hospital stay, numbers of sutures used, secondary corrective procedures, post-operative sick leave and surgeon- and patient-reported appearance of the breasts.
    We included 22 women: 11 operated on by the LOPOSAM technique and 11 by the technique described by Rubin JP. The total operative time was 84.8 (SD 12.2) minutes in the LOPOSAM group and 99.1 (SD 23.5) in the Rubin JP group (p = 0.074). There were no differences related to days with drains, length of hospital stay or sick leave between the two groups. The surgeon- and the patient-reported appearance of the breasts changed significantly between the pre-operative and the 12-month post-operative assessments.
    The LOPOSAM technique is a safe and quick surgical procedure for correction of ptotic, wide, lateralized and deflated breasts following massive weight loss and seems to provide results comparable to the better-known Rubin JP\'s technique. There was a trend that the LOPOSAM technique was faster to perform, however, not significant. The breast appearance improved significantly using both techniques when assessed by both surgeons and patients.
    This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号