Little evidence is available to provide context for understanding the experiences of parents and youth from historically marginalized groups as they age into adulthood, especially in regard to the transition experiences of Black autistic transition-age youth and their family members. This commentary builds upon recent publications that inform intersectional understandings of Black autistic experiences in America, and outlines research recommendations to better address the specific needs of Black autistic transition-age youth. Given the noted deficits in transition research and the transition process in regard to the experiences of Black autistic youth, we provide recommendations for improving autism transition research. We propose changes that are necessary to achieve equitable research processes, which could inform the design of targeted interventions to improve transition experiences for Black autistic youth.
Why is this topic important? There is little research on the experiences of Black autistic youth and young adults during the transition to adulthood. It is important to study this group of people, because they may have more unmet needs for services and supports during the transition years. They may have a harder time achieving employment or continuing their education because of the long-term effects of racism in communities. What is the purpose of this article? To add to what is known on this topic, we report on recent studies about Black autistic youth during the transition to adulthood. We provide research and practice recommendations. What personal or professional perspectives do the authors bring to this topic? The authors of this study are allistic researchers and research assistants who are members of a research team working on, or advising, autism transition research. A.M.R. is a White researcher, and a family member of autistic individuals, who studies the transition experiences of autistic youth. S.V. is a Black, nonbinary, public health social worker with experience in Black LGBTQIA+ mental health. E.-D.W. is a Black researcher who studies the mental health of Black autistic youth. H.S. is a White qualitative sociologist with experience studying the transition to young adulthood from the critical disability lens. K.A.A. is a mixed-race researcher who is White-presenting and who studies the intersectionality of autism, race, and poverty. T.M.H. is a Black researcher whose work focuses on intersecting identities, with a special focus on race and autism, and the way those intersections impact the lived experiences of individuals. L.L.S. is a White researcher with experience in studying health services disparities. The positionality of this team is that we identify as nonautistic researchers who seek to support increased focus on Black autistic youth and adults within autism research. What is already known about this topic? We know that there has been little attention given to studying how Black autistic youth and their families experience the transition to adulthood. We also know they are less likely to receive information about the transition in a timely manner. These disparities are unacceptable. What do the authors recommend? We need to find better ways to learn about the barriers that Black autistic youth face as they become adults. We also need to learn about the strengths they use to overcome these barriers. That information will help us to design ways to improve transitions. This work should be done with Black autistic youth and their families as partners. Researchers should use different approaches to invite Black youth into their studies. When researchers are designing studies they should think about the connections between people\'s identities such as being autistic, Black, or poor, because these identities combine to make discrimination worse. It would be helpful if the leaders of academic departments placed value on hiring Black and autistic scholars and encouraged more diversity within research. How will these recommendations help autistic adults now or in the future? It is possible to make changes in how Black autistic transition-age youth move through transition. However, the same solutions will not work for all communities. This is because different communities experience different barriers to receiving information and services during the transition years. We hope these recommendations will help researchers to think about how they can improve the participation of Black autistic youth and their family members.

BACKGROUND: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a critical biomedical strategy to prevent HIV transmission among cisgender women. Despite its proven effectiveness, Black cisgender women remain significantly underrepresented throughout the PrEP care continuum, facing barriers such as limited access to care, medical mistrust, and intersectional racial or HIV stigma. Addressing these disparities is vital to improving HIV prevention outcomes within this community. On the other hand, nurse practitioners (NPs) play a pivotal role in PrEP utilization but are underrepresented due to a lack of awareness, a lack of human resources, and insufficient support. Equipped with the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced large language models, chatbots effectively facilitate health care communication and linkage to care in various domains, including HIV prevention and PrEP care.
OBJECTIVE: Our study harnesses NPs\' holistic care capabilities and the power of AI through natural language processing algorithms, providing targeted, patient-centered facilitation for PrEP care. Our overarching goal is to create a nurse-led, stakeholder-inclusive, and AI-powered program to facilitate PrEP utilization among Black cisgender women, ultimately enhancing HIV prevention efforts in this vulnerable group in 3 phases. This project aims to mitigate health disparities and advance innovative, technology-based solutions.
METHODS: The study uses a mixed methods design involving semistructured interviews with key stakeholders, including 50 PrEP-eligible Black women, 10 NPs, and a community advisory board representing various socioeconomic backgrounds. The AI-powered chatbot is developed using HumanX technology and SmartBot360\'s Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant framework to ensure data privacy and security. The study spans 18 months and consists of 3 phases: exploration, development, and evaluation.
RESULTS: As of May 2024, the institutional review board protocol for phase 1 has been approved. We plan to start recruitment for Black cisgender women and NPs in September 2024, with the aim to collect information to understand their preferences regarding chatbot development. While institutional review board approval for phases 2 and 3 is still in progress, we have made significant strides in networking for participant recruitment. We plan to conduct data collection soon, and further updates on the recruitment and data collection progress will be provided as the study advances.
CONCLUSIONS: The AI-powered chatbot offers a novel approach to improving PrEP care utilization among Black cisgender women, with opportunities to reduce barriers to care and facilitate a stigma-free environment. However, challenges remain regarding health equity and the digital divide, emphasizing the need for culturally competent design and robust data privacy protocols. The implications of this study extend beyond PrEP care, presenting a scalable model that can address broader health disparities.
UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/59975.

BACKGROUND: Different racial and ethnic groups have demonstrated heterogeneity in the clinical course of multiple sclerosis(MS).
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate disease characteristics in African, Caribbean, and Black people with MS(ACB-MS) followed at a single centre in Toronto, Canada.
METHODS: ACB-MS were compared with age- and sex-matched people with MS (pwMS) of European descent(EUR-MS) identified through the clinic registry.
RESULTS: 344 PwMS were included(n = 172 ACB-MS, n = 172 EUR-MS; mean age 43 years, 68 % female). Baseline mean Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores (ACB-MS 2.3 ± 2.3 vs. EUR-MS 2.2 ± 2.0, p = 0.38) and subsequent clinical and radiological measures of disease activity were similar between groups, including annualized relapse rate (ARR)(ACB-MS 0.47 ± 0.47 vs. EUR-MS 0.41 ± 0.34, p = 0.2) and most recent EDSS (ACB-MS 2.7 ± 2.2 vs. EUR-MS 2.3 ± 2.1, p = 0.10). However, the proportion of MRI brain demonstrating new disease activity was higher(37% vs. 26 %, p < 0.05) and disability progression greater in ACB-MS vs. EUR-MS(43% vs. 33 %,p < 0.05) but measures of disease severity including MS Severity Score(3.17 vs. 2.58, p = 0.3) and Progression Index(PI) (0.27 vs. 0.30, p = 0.5) were comparable.
CONCLUSIONS: Disability progression was seen more commonly in ACB-MS, though clinical disease activity and severity were generally comparable between ACB-MS and EUR-MS patients in Toronto, Canada. These findings partially differ from prior studies demonstrating more overtly aggressive MS disease courses in Black and African American PwMS, necessitating further studies to understand how structural determinants of health drive these disparities.

The present study delved into the chemical composition, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties of three dry edible beans: Black (BL), Great Northern (GN), and Pinto (PN). The beans were soaked, cooked, and subjected to in vitro gastrointestinal (GI) digestion. BL bean exhibited significantly higher gastric (42%) and intestinal (8%) digestion rates. Comparative assessment of soluble GI-digested fractions (<3 kDa) revealed that the GN bean exhibited the highest abundance of dipeptides (P < 0.05). The BL bean fraction displayed a 4-fold increase in tripeptides (P < 0.05). Both BL and PN bean fractions are high in essential free amino acids, flavonols, and derivatives of hydroxybenzoic acid when compared to the GN bean. All the beans exhibited the ability to mitigate TNF-α-induced pro-inflammatory signaling; however, the BL bean fraction was the most effective at lowering AAPH-induced oxidative stress in HT-29 cells, followed by the GN bean (P < 0.05). In contrast, a low antioxidant effect was observed with PN beans.

BACKGROUND: Access to evidence-based interventions is urgently required, especially for individuals of minoritized identities who experience unique barriers to mental health care. Digital mental health interventions have the potential to increase accessibility. Previous pilot studies testing HabitWorks, a smartphone app providing an interpretation bias intervention, have found strong engagement and adherence for HabitWorks; however, previous trials\' samples consisted of predominantly non-Hispanic, White individuals.
OBJECTIVE: This study conducted an open trial of HabitWorks in a community sample of adults who identified as Black, Hispanic or Latinx, or both. This study aims to test safety, acceptability, and engagement with the HabitWorks app for Black and Latinx adults.
METHODS: Black, Hispanic or Latinx adults (mean age 32.83, SD 11.06 y; 22/31, 71% women) who endorsed symptoms of anxiety or depression were asked to complete interpretation modification exercises via HabitWorks 3 times per week for 1 month. Interpretation bias and anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed at baseline and posttreatment assessments. Participants completed qualitative interviews to assess overall perceptions of HabitWorks.
RESULTS: Of the 31 participants that downloaded the app, 27 (87%) used HabitWorks all 4 weeks. On average, participants completed 15.74 (SD 7.43) exercises out of the 12 prescribed, demonstrating high engagement. Acceptability ratings met all a priori benchmarks except for relevancy. Qualitative interviews also demonstrated high acceptability and few negative experiences. Significant improvements were found in interpretation style (t30=2.29; P<.001), with a large effect size (Cohen d=1.53); anxiety symptoms (t30=2.29; P=.03), with a small effect size (Cohen d=0.41); and depression symptoms (t30=3.065; P=.005), with a medium effect size (Cohen d=0.55).
CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the literature evaluating digital mental health interventions in Black and Latinx adults. Preliminary results further support a future controlled trial testing the effectiveness of HabitWorks as an intervention.

BACKGROUND: School-based social support for Black students may mediate or modify the association between school segregation and late-life cognition.
METHODS: Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans participants (n = 574) reported segregated school attendance and school-based social support. Associations of segregated schooling with domain-specific cognitive outcomes and effect modification or mediation by school-based social support were evaluated with linear mixed models.
RESULTS: Segregated school attendance was associated with increased likelihood of school-based social support. Segregated (vs. desegregated in 6th grade) school attendance was associated with lower executive function (β = -0.18 [-0.34, -0.02]) and semantic memory z-scores (β = -0.31 [-0.48, -0.13]). Social support did not mediate these associations. Estimates for segregated school attendance were attenuated among those who felt supported, although there was limited evidence of statistically significant effect modification.
CONCLUSIONS: Early-childhood school segregation was associated with poorer cognitive function. Sources of resilience within racialized educational experiences should be further evaluated to bridge inequities.
CONCLUSIONS: School segregation is a form of structural racism that affected the educational experiences of Black youth with potentially lasting consequences for healthy brain aging. Black students who attended a segregated school experienced greater school-based social support, which may highlight a potential source of resilience and resistance against the effects of racism-related stressors on cognitive function. The estimated adverse association between attending a segregated school on cognition was larger for students without an adult at school who cared about them versus those with an adult at school who cared about them, but estimates were imprecise.

 INTRODUCTION: Cancer causes significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. It is the second most common cause of death in the United States, after heart disease. African Americans are disproportionately affected by malignancy, with overall higher death rates compared to other racial and ethnic groups. Screening tests can identify early stage malignancy allowing for timely intervention. However, African Americans less frequently undergo cancer screening. Advancement in genomic technology has led to the identification of signals for cancer in the blood. This has resulted in the development of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests which evaluate for circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). This study evaluated physicians\' perception of the use of a multi-cancer early detection test (MCED).
METHODS: An anonymous, 29 question survey was administered to African American / Black physicians and medical students. Survey participants were identified through the National Medical Association and other professional organizations that included primarily African American physicians. Surveys were excluded from analysis if respondent was non-African American / Black or was not a physician or medical student. The survey collected physician demographics, percentage of African American / Black patients in their practice, patient barriers to screening, potential use of MCED tests and factors influencing decision to recommend testing. Descriptive statistics were generated. Additional analysis was performed using Chi-Square with statistical significance set at p-value <0.05. The survey was pilot tested for reliability and validity.
RESULTS: 1196 (681 female, 515 male) physicians and medical students completed the survey. 95.8 % were physicians who were or had been in clinical practice. Fifty-three percent of physicians reported that >40 % of their patients were African American / Black. Barriers to cancer screening included lack of understanding of the importance (33.8 %), lack of or limited insurance coverage (23.5 %), socioeconomic factors unrelated to insurance coverage (16.2 %), fear of cancer (8.8 %), history of racism and bias in the health care system (7.4 %) with 8.8 % reporting \'other\' and 1.5 % reporting no perceived barriers. There was a significant difference (p<0.03) in the rate that physicians\' perceived racism and bias in the health care system as barrier for cancer screening in African American / Black patients when compared to other patients. Most physicians and medical students indicated that a MCED test would benefit all patients (86.8 %), would encourage further cancer screening tests (83.8 %), and would be beneficial for minority and under-represented patients regardless of socioeconomics or health care access (83.8 %). Seventy-five percent of survey respondents indicated that a MCED test would be beneficial in promoting further cancer screening and early detection in African American / Black patients. Factors that would impact the ordering of an MCED test included scientific evidence and test validity (63.2 %), efficiency, accessibility, ease of ordering and ease of receiving results (11.8 %), insurance coverage (13.2 %) and \'other factors\' (11.8 %).
CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest surveys to assess physicians\' perceptions about MCED testing and is the first study to evaluate the perspectives of African American physicians. It offers insight about physician acceptance and potential incorporation of MCED into clinical practice. It is important that a multifaceted approach is employed to improve cancer outcomes and reduce disparities in survival. MCED tests, a relatively new advancement in genomic technology, have the potential to be an important component in cancer screening strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal cancer significantly contributes to US cancer mortality, with notable racial disparities. This study aims to provide updated esophageal cancer mortality trends among Black and White adults from 1999 to 2020.
METHODS: CDC-WONDER was used to identify Black and White adults in the United States from 1999 to 2020. We calculated age-standardized mortality rates, absolute rate differences, and rate ratios to compare the mortality differences between these populations.
RESULTS: From 1999 to 2020 in the United States, there were 303 267 esophageal cancer deaths, with significant racial disparities. The age-adjusted mortality rate for Black adults fell from 6.52 to 2.62 per 100 000, while for White adults, it declined from 4.19 to 3.97 per 100 000, narrowing the racial mortality gap. Gender-wise, the study showed a decrease in the mortality rate from 3.31 to 2.29 per 100 000 in Black women, but an increase from 1.52 to 1.99 per 100 000 in White women. Among young men, the rate dropped in Black men from 12.82 to 6.26 per 100 000 but rose in White men from 9.90 to 10.57 per 100 000. Regionally, Black adults in the Midwest and South initially had higher mortality rates than Whites, but this gap reduced over time. By 2020, Black men had lower mortality rates across all regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Over the last two decades, age-adjusted esophageal cancer mortality decreased in Black adults but stabilized in White adults, reflecting distinct cancer trends and risk factors. The study highlights the importance of tailored public health strategies for healthcare access and risk factor management.

暂无摘要。

Osseous bridging (OB) in three or more segments of motions (SOMs) of the mobile spine was initially defined as diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), located particularly in the thoracic spine (T-spine). This pathological phenomenon is often characterized by calcification and ossification, which take place simultaneously or separately. The soft tissues, mainly ligaments and entheses, are calcified, with bone formation not originating from the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). DISH formation can involve osteophytes, which are created by the ossification process and can involve soft tissue such as the ALL. The ALL can also be calcified. Until recently, the prevalence of DISH in the general population was considered low (0%-5%) and rare in the cervical spine (C-spine). In a cross-sectional observational skeletal study, we investigated the prevalence and location of C-spine OB between vertebral bodies with fewer than three SOMs. We tested a large sample (n = 2779) of C-spines housed in the Cleveland Museum of Natural History (Ohio, USA). The human sources of the samples had died between the years 1912 and 1938 and represented both sexes and two different ethnic groups: Black Americans and White Americans. The process development can be seen on the ALLs as calcification, osteophytosis, and candle-shaped. Among all of the specimens, 139 (5%) were affected by OB, mostly in one SOM. Prevalence tended to be higher in women, White Americans, and the older age group. The levels most affected were C3-C4, followed by C2-C3 and subsequently, C5-C6. OB involving two consecutive SOMs was found only at C5-C7. We believe it is important to respond to the presence of a single SOM with a presumptive diagnosis of OB and to follow up, identify whether the diagnosis is correct, and take preventive action if possible. There is a need for updated diagnostic criteria and research approaches that reflect contemporary lifestyle factors and their impact on spine health.