Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia

痴呆的行为和心理症状
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:照顾阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症患者的一个共同挑战是管理痴呆症(BPSD)的行为和心理症状。有效管理BPSD将提高痴呆症患者的生活质量,减轻护理人员的负担,降低医疗成本。
    目的:在这篇综述中,我们寻求(1)研究与光有关的室内环境质量参数,噪音,温度,和湿度与BPSD相关,以及如何控制这些参数可以帮助管理这些症状和(2)确定该领域的当前知识状态,目前的研究空白,和潜在的未来方向。
    方法:在CINAHL中进行了搜索,Embase,MEDLINE,和PsycINFO数据库,用于2007年1月至2024年2月发表的论文。我们搜索了研究与光有关的室内环境质量参数之间的关系的研究,噪音,温度,湿度和BPSD。
    结果:在2020年10月的原始搜索中总共确定了3123篇论文。经过另外2次搜索和筛选,纳入了5476篇论文中的38篇(0.69%)。在包括的论文中,光是研究最多的环境因素(34/38,89%),而研究其他环境因素与BPSD之间关系的研究较少(从5/38,13%到11/38,29%)。在38项研究中,8(21%)检测了多个室内环境质量参数。在38项研究中,有6项(16%)是环境评估的唯一来源。关于躁动和光疗之间关系的发现是矛盾的,而研究BPSD与温度或湿度之间关系的研究都是观察性的。结果表明,当环境因素被认为对痴呆症患者刺激过度或刺激不足时,行为症状往往会加剧。
    结论:这项范围审查的结果可能会为长期护理单位和老年人住房的设计提供信息,以支持就地老龄化。还需要更多的研究来更好地了解室内环境质量参数与BPSD之间的关系,并且需要对室内环境质量参数和行为症状进行更客观的测量。未来的一个方向是在实时评估中纳入客观感知和先进的计算方法,以启动及时的环境干预措施。更好地管理BPSD将使患者受益,看护者,和医疗保健系统。
    BACKGROUND: A common challenge for individuals caring for people with Alzheimer disease and related dementias is managing the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Effective management of BPSD will increase the quality of life of people living with dementia, lessen caregivers\' burden, and lower health care cost.
    OBJECTIVE: In this review, we seek to (1) examine how indoor environmental quality parameters pertaining to light, noise, temperature, and humidity are associated with BPSD and how controlling these parameters can help manage these symptoms and (2) identify the current state of knowledge in this area, current gaps in the research, and potential future directions.
    METHODS: Searches were conducted in the CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases for papers published from January 2007 to February 2024. We searched for studies examining the relationship between indoor environmental quality parameters pertaining to light, noise, temperature, and humidity and BPSD.
    RESULTS: A total of 3123 papers were identified in the original search in October 2020. After an additional 2 searches and screening, 38 (0.69%) of the 5476 papers were included. Among the included papers, light was the most studied environmental factor (34/38, 89%), while there were fewer studies (from 5/38, 13% to 11/38, 29%) examining the relationships between other environmental factors and BPSD. Of the 38 studies, 8 (21%) examined multiple indoor environmental quality parameters. Subjective data were the only source of environmental assessments in 6 (16%) of the 38 studies. The findings regarding the relationship between agitation and light therapy are conflicted, while the studies that examined the relationship between BPSD and temperature or humidity are all observational. The results suggest that when the environmental factors are deemed overstimulating or understimulating for an individual with dementia, the behavioral symptoms tend to be exacerbated.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this scoping review may inform the design of long-term care units and older adult housing to support aging in place. More research is still needed to better understand the relationship between indoor environmental quality parameters and BPSD, and there is a need for more objective measurements of both the indoor environmental quality parameters and behavioral symptoms. One future direction is to incorporate objective sensing and advanced computational methods in real-time assessments to initiate just-in-time environmental interventions. Better management of BPSD will benefit patients, caregivers, and the health care system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    科恩-曼斯菲尔德躁动量表(CMAI)量化了老年人躁动行为的频率。对来自brexpiprazole临床计划的数据进行事后分析,旨在确定与阿尔茨海默氏病引起的痴呆相关的躁动患者的CMAI总分的有意义的患者内变化(MWPC)阈值。
    数据来自三个12周,多中心,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照,用于治疗与阿尔茨海默病引起的痴呆相关的躁动的布立哌唑平行臂试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01862640,NCT01922258,NCT03548584)。CMAI总分的变化(范围29-203;更高的分数表示更高频率的躁动行为)从基线到第12周是每个试验的主要终点。MWPC阈值由基于锚的均值变化分析和接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线估计。临床总体印象-疾病严重程度(CGI-S)和临床总体印象-改善(CGI-I)量表,两者都与激动有关,被用作锚。绘制了经验累积分布函数(eCDF)和概率密度函数(PDF)作为支持证据。还采用了基于分布的方法。
    对898例患者的数据进行了分析(平均年龄,73.7年;平均基线CMAI总分,73.8).平均CMAI总分变化对应于微小改善与差异稳定(CGI-S一点下降与无变化),或最低限度的改进与没有变化(CGI-I评分为3与4),范围从-10.6到-13.5点。平均CMAI总分变化对应于中度改善与差异稳定(CGI-S两点下降与无变化),或者改进了很多无变化(CGI-I评分为2与4),范围从-20.2到-25.7点。ROC曲线分析通常产生较小的有意义变化的估计。eCDF和PDF显示CMAI的良好分布和分离CGI-S/CGI-I类别之间的总分变化。在基于分布的分析中,CMAI总分的最小可检测变化(10.5~11.8分)通常低于锚定建议阈值.
    基于锚定和基于分布的分析对证据进行三角剖分支持CMAI总分-20分的MWPC阈值,阈值范围为-15到-25点,与阿尔茨海默病引起的痴呆相关的躁动患者。
    UNASSIGNED: The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) quantifies the frequency of agitation behaviors in elderly persons. This post hoc analysis of data from the brexpiprazole clinical program aimed to determine a meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) threshold for CMAI Total score among patients with agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer\'s disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were included from three 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trials of brexpiprazole for the treatment of agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer\'s disease (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01862640, NCT01922258, NCT03548584). Change in CMAI Total score (range 29-203; higher scores indicate higher frequency of agitation behaviors) from baseline to Week 12 was the primary endpoint in each trial. MWPC thresholds were estimated from anchor-based mean change analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity of illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scales, both as related to agitation, were used as anchors. Empirical cumulative distribution functions (eCDFs) and probability density functions (PDFs) were plotted as supportive evidence. Distribution-based methods were also employed.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 898 patients were analyzed (mean age, 73.7 years; mean baseline CMAI Total score, 73.8). The mean CMAI Total score change corresponding to a difference of small improvement vs. stable (CGI-S one-point decrease vs. no change), or minimally improved vs. no change (CGI-I rating of 3 vs. 4), ranged from -10.6 to -13.5 points. The mean CMAI Total score change corresponding to a difference of moderate improvement vs. stable (CGI-S two-point decrease vs. no change), or much improved vs. no change (CGI-I rating of 2 vs. 4), ranged from -20.2 to -25.7 points. ROC curve analyses generally produced smaller estimates of meaningful change. eCDFs and PDFs showed good distribution and separation of CMAI Total score change between CGI-S/CGI-I categories. In distribution-based analyses, the minimal detectable change for CMAI Total score (10.5-11.8 points) was generally lower than anchor-suggested thresholds.
    UNASSIGNED: Triangulation of evidence from anchor- and distribution-based analyses supports an MWPC threshold for CMAI Total score of -20 points, with a threshold range of -15 to -25 points, in patients with agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer\'s disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已发现痴呆症家庭照顾者的矛盾情绪与照顾者与痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD相关压力)相关的压力有关,和抑郁症状。矛盾的感觉也可能影响护理人员与痴呆症患者(PLwD)的关系的感知质量,但是这个变量几乎没有被研究过。这项研究分析了矛盾情绪在照顾者与BPSD相关压力之间的关联中的作用,与PLwD的关系的感知质量,和抑郁症状。
    开发了理论模型,并在390名家庭护理人员的样本中进行了测试。
    获得的测试模型对数据具有极好的拟合度,解释了24%的抑郁症状学变异。护理人员与BPSD相关的压力之间存在显著关联,矛盾的感情,和抑郁症状。此外,通过感知的关系质量,发现了矛盾情绪和抑郁症状之间关联的间接影响。
    痴呆症家庭照顾者的矛盾情绪与照顾者的BPSD相关压力有关,对较低关系质量的感知,和更高的抑郁症状。
    以照顾者为目标,对痴呆症家庭照顾者的干预措施中的矛盾情绪和关系质量可能会减少他们的痛苦。
    UNASSIGNED: Ambivalent feelings in dementia family caregivers have been found to be related to caregivers´ stress associated with the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD-related stress), and depressive symptoms. Ambivalent feelings may also affect caregivers´ perceived quality of the relationship with the person living with dementia (PLwD), but this variable has been scarcely studied. This study analyzes the role of ambivalent feelings in the association between caregivers\' BPSD-related stress, perceived quality of the relationship with the PLwD, and depressive symptomatology.
    UNASSIGNED: A theoretical model was developed and tested in a sample of 390 family caregivers.
    UNASSIGNED: The obtained tested model had an excellent fit to the data, explaining 24% of the variance of depressive symptomatology. A significant association was found between caregivers\' BPSD-related stress, ambivalent feelings, and depressive symptomatology. Also, an indirect effect in the association between ambivalent feelings and depressive symptomatology was found through the perceived quality of the relationship.
    UNASSIGNED: Ambivalent feelings in dementia family caregivers are associated with caregivers\' BPSD-related stress, perception of a lower relationship quality, and higher depressive symptomatology.
    UNASSIGNED: Targeting caregivers\' ambivalent feelings and the quality of the relationship in interventions for dementia family caregivers may decrease their distress.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了评估知识,护士对痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)的非药物治疗的态度和实践。
    方法:这个横截面,以问卷调查为基础的研究招募北京协和医院护士(北京,中国)2022年9月至2022年10月。知识之间的相关性,态度和实践评分采用Pearson相关分析。与知识相关的因素,态度和实践得分通过多元线性回归确定。根据横断面问卷调查,本研究根据《中国痴呆诊疗指南》设计问卷,并于2022年9月至2022年10月通过文娟星在线平台随机抽取北京协和医院护士填写问题。
    结果:分析包括210名护士(202名女性)。平均知识,态度和实践得分为11.06±2.61(总分:18),53.51±5.81(总分:60)和64.66±10.35(总分:80)分,分别。知识得分与态度得分(r=0.416,P<0.001)、实践得分(r=0.389,P<0.001)呈正相关,态度得分与实践得分(r=0.627,P<0.001)。多变量分析表明,年龄≥40岁(与≤30岁)与较高的知识得分相关(β=1.48,95%置信区间[95CI]=0.42-2.54,P=0.006)。年龄≥40岁(β=1.43,95CI=0.35-2.51,P=0.010vs.≤30岁)和学士学位或更高(β=1.11,95CI=0.12-2.10,P=0.028vs.大学学历或更低)与较高的实践分数相关。
    结论:年龄大、文化程度高与知识水平高相关。态度和/或练习分数。这项研究的结果可能有助于指导教育和培训计划的制定和实施,以改善中国护士对BPSD的管理。
    BACKGROUND: To evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practice of nurses regarding non-pharmacologic therapies for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).
    METHODS: This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study enrolled nurses at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Beijing, China) between September 2022 and October 2022. Correlations between knowledge, attitude and practice scores were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis. Factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice scores were identified by multivariable linear regression. Based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, this study designed a questionnaire according to the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia in China, and randomly selected nurses from Peking Union Medical College Hospital to fill in the questions through the Wen-Juan-Xing online platform from September 2022 to October 2022.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 210 nurses (202 females). The average knowledge, attitude and practice scores were 11.06±2.61 (total score: 18), 53.51±5.81 (total score: 60) and 64.66 ± 10.35 (total score: 80) points, respectively. Knowledge score was positively correlated with attitude score (r = 0.416, P < 0.001) and practice score (r = 0.389, P < 0.001); attitude and practice scores were also positively correlated (r = 0.627, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age ≥ 40 years-old (vs. ≤30 years-old) was associated with higher knowledge score (β = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 0.42-2.54, P = 0.006). Age ≥ 40 years-old (β = 1.43, 95%CI = 0.35-2.51, P = 0.010 vs. ≤30 years-old) and bachelor\'s degree or higher (β = 1.11, 95%CI = 0.12-2.10, P = 0.028 vs. college degree or lower) were associated with higher practice score.
    CONCLUSIONS: Older age and higher education level were associated with higher knowledge, attitude and/or practice scores. The findings of this study may help guide the development and implementation of education and training programs to improve the management of BPSD by nurses in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经精神症状是家庭痴呆症照顾者照顾者负担的重要风险因素。通过对这些症状进行分组,关于神经精神症状的临床解释可能会促进,因为不同的症状组可能需要不同的干预方法,从而减轻照顾者的负担。
    由于神经精神症状的聚集可能与临床相关,我们旨在探讨这些集群对家庭痴呆照顾者负担的影响.
    152名痴呆症家庭照顾者被包括在内。使用ErvarenDruk门InformeleZorg(EDIZ)/非正式护理的自我感觉压力来测量照顾者的负担,荷兰问卷。看护者还报告了他们所照顾的痴呆症患者的日常活动中的神经精神症状和功能障碍。这项横断面研究使用了多元回归分析。
    针对功能损害和社会人口统计学变量进行了调整,神经精神症状与更多的照顾者负担相关(p<0.001).然而,三种神经精神症状群之间的这种关联没有差异(p=0.745).
    神经精神症状与更多的家庭照顾者负担有关,但是没有确凿的证据表明这三个集群的关联不同。神经精神症状的聚类是,然而,值得在未来更多参与者的研究中进一步探索。如果找到特定的链接,这些可以在临床实践中作为目标,以防止,减轻和/或推迟照顾者的负担。
    UNASSIGNED: Neuropsychiatric symptoms are a robust risk factor for caregiver burden in family dementia caregivers. By grouping these symptoms, clinical interpretations regarding neuropsychiatric symptoms may facilitated because different groups of symptoms may require a different approach for intervention, thereby reducing caregiver burden.
    UNASSIGNED: As clustering of neuropsychiatric symptoms could be clinically relevant, we aimed to explore the effects of these clusters on burden in family dementia caregivers.
    UNASSIGNED: 152 family dementia caregivers were included. Caregiver burden was measured using the Ervaren Druk door Informele Zorg (EDIZ)/Self-Perceived Pressure from Informal Care, a Dutch questionnaire. Caregivers also reported the neuropsychiatric symptoms and functional impairments in daily activities of the people with dementia they cared for. Multiple regression analyses were used in this cross-sectional study.
    UNASSIGNED: Adjusted for functional impairments and sociodemographic variables, neuropsychiatric symptoms were associated with more caregiver burden (p < 0.001). However, this association did not differ between the three neuropsychiatric symptom clusters (p = 0.745).
    UNASSIGNED: Neuropsychiatric symptoms were associated with more family caregiver burden, but no conclusive evidence was found that this association differed for the three clusters. Clustering of neuropsychiatric symptoms is, however, worth exploring further in future studies with more participants. If specific links are found, these could be targeted in clinical practice in order to prevent, reduce and/or postpone caregiver burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究调查了痴呆症患者在口腔保健期间所表现出的抗护理行为(CRB)的日常变化,以及一天中的时间对CRB轨迹的潜在影响。
    方法:对75位在口腔护理活动中表现出CRB的老年痴呆症患者的样本进行了二次分析。超过21天,在上午和下午的口腔护理期间,使用修订的护理抵抗能力量表(RTC-r)测量CRB。基于组的轨迹建模用于识别轨迹模式并评估上午和下午CRB模式之间的差异。
    结果:确定了三种轨迹模式:早晨CRB轨迹模式显示,50.6%的痴呆症患者的RTC-r评分始终较低,37.5%的痴呆症患者表现出波动,中等RTC-r分数,11.9%的人表现出RTC-r分数开始较高,然后随着时间的推移而下降。同样,下午口腔护理期间的CRB轨迹模式显示,54.5%的RTC-r得分持续较低,38.6%的痴呆症患者的RTC-r得分波动适中。然而,第三个CRB轨迹组遵循一个高增长的轨迹,对于6.9%的痴呆症患者,RTC-r评分开始较高,并继续增加。
    结论:CRB是动态的,并且在几天和一段时间内变化;但是,在管理CRB的干预措施中通常不考虑一天中的时间。因此,重要的是要考虑为痴呆症患者提供口腔护理的时机。根据轨迹的特征,我们建议早上的口腔活动可能更有效。
    OBJECTIVE: This study examined day-to-day variation in care-resistant behaviors (CRBs) exhibited by persons living with dementia during mouth health care and the potential influence of time-of-day on CRB trajectories.
    METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted on a sample of 75 nursing home-dwelling persons living with dementia who exhibited CRBs during mouth care activities. Over 21 days, CRBs were measured using the revised Resistiveness to Care Scale (RTC-r) during morning and afternoon mouth care sessions. Group-based Trajectory Modeling was used to identify trajectory patterns and assess differences between morning and afternoon CRB patterns.
    RESULTS: Three trajectory patterns were identified: morning CRB trajectory patterns showed 50.6% of persons living with dementia had consistently low RTC-r scores, 37.5% of persons living with dementia exhibited fluctuating, moderate RTC-r scores, and 11.9% exhibited RTC-r scores that started high and then decreased over time. Similarly, CRB trajectory patterns during afternoon mouth care showed a consistently low RTC-r score for 54.5% and a fluctuating moderate RTC-r score for 38.6% of persons living with dementia. However, the third CRB trajectory group followed a high-increasing trajectory, with RTC-r scores starting high and continuing to increase for 6.9% of persons living with dementia.
    CONCLUSIONS: CRBs are dynamic and vary within days and over time; however, the time of the day is often not considered in interventions to manage CRBs. Thus, it is important to consider the timing of providing mouth care for persons living with dementia. Based on the characteristics of the trajectories, we suggest that morning mouth activities may be more efficient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:系统评价痴呆患者情感淡漠的现状及其相关因素。
    方法:我们检索了中文和英文数据库,收集了从发病到2023年3月14日痴呆患者冷漠相关因素的研究。两名研究人员独立筛选了文献,评估质量,结果:共纳入20项研究,痴呆患者的冷漠发生率为21%至90%。根据Massimo在2018年提出的冷漠模型,将相关因素分为痴呆患者的个体因素,照顾者因素,和环境因素。痴呆患者冷漠的个体因素主要包括人口学特征,认知障碍的严重程度,痴呆症的其他行为和心理症状的组合,急性医疗问题或药物不良反应,未满足的需求,和营养不良。照顾者因素主要包括对痴呆症患者和照顾者对未来美好生活的期望的敌意或批评的情绪表达。环境因素主要包括过高或过低的刺激和缺乏日间活动。结论:现有研究表明,痴呆患者冷漠的发生率较高,并受到多维因素的影响。对痴呆患者个体因素的研究较多,对照顾者和环境因素的研究较少。在未来,需要大量高质量的研究来证明痴呆患者冷漠的机制,并找到更多的相关因素。
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the current status of apathy in dementia patients and its associated factors.
    METHODS: We searched Chinese and English databases to collect studies on the associated factors of apathy in patients with dementia from inception to March 14, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, evaluated the quality, and extracted the data RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included, and the incidence of apathy in patients with dementia ranged from 21 % to 90 %. According to the model of apathy proposed by Massimo in 2018, the associated factors were divided into individual factors for dementia patients, caregiver factors, and environmental factors. The individual factors of apathy in patients with dementia mainly include demographic characteristics, the severity of cognitive impairment, a combination of other behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, acute medical problems or adverse drug reactions, unmet needs, and malnutrition. Caregiver factors mainly include emotional expressions of hostility or criticism towards dementia patients and caregivers\' expectations for a better life in the future. Environmental factors mainly include too high or too low stimulation and a lack of daytime activities CONCLUSIONS: Existing studies have shown that the incidence of apathy in dementia patients is high and is affected by multi-dimensional factors. There are more studies on individual factors in dementia patients and fewer studies on caregivers and environmental factors. In the future, a large number of high-quality studies are needed to demonstrate the mechanism of apathy in dementia patients and to find more related factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    除了非药物干预,药物治疗,特别是非典型抗精神病药被认为对痴呆(BPSD)的行为和心理症状有效.
    这项回顾性研究调查了包括抗精神病药物在内的药物治疗在门诊或住院BPSD患者中的有效性和安全性。
    在2011年3月至8月之间开始治疗BPSD的所有阿尔茨海默型痴呆(AD)患者中,共有102名可接受12个月随访的患者包括本图表中的受试者。其中,68(66.7%)在门诊或住院环境中继续治疗,在3、6和12个月后,他们的MMSE评分从基线时的17.3±3.6提高到18.3±3.53、17.9±3.80和17.0±4.14,分别。相比之下,他们的NPI评分从基线时的11.7±11.2到3、6和12个月后的4.86±5.40、3.56±4.65和2.27±3.77有显著差异,分别。在可接受随访的36名住院患者中,27(75%)同时服用抗精神病药(氯丙嗪[CP]等效,162.2mg)在基线时同时服用抗精神病药(CP当量,212.5mg)12个月后,while,在可接受随访的66名门诊病人中,13(19.7%)同时服用抗精神病药(CP当量,93.4mg)在基线时同时服用抗精神病药(CP当量,113.0mg)12个月后。
    研究结果证实了日本AD患者BPSD长达12个月的研究治疗的有效性和安全性。如何在临床环境中最好地将抗精神病药纳入BPSD的治疗中,掌握在我们日本临床医生的手中。
    UNASSIGNED: Alongside non-pharmacological intervention, pharmacotherapy particularly with atypical antipsychotics is assumed to be effective for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study investigated the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy including antipsychotics in outpatients or inpatients with BPSD.
    UNASSIGNED: Of all Alzheimer-type dementia (AD) patients with BPSD initiating treatment between March and August 2011, a total of 102 patients available for 12-month follow-up comprised the subjects in this chart review. Of these, 68 (66.7%) continued treatment in the ambulatory or inpatient setting, with their MMSE scores improved from 17.3 ± 3.6 at baseline to 18.3 ± 3.53, 17.9 ± 3.80 and 17.0 ± 4.14 after 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In contrast, their NPI scores were significantly different from 11.7 ± 11.2 at baseline to 4.86 ± 5.40, 3.56 ± 4.65 and 2.27 ± 3.77 after 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Of the 36 inpatients available for follow-up, 27 (75%) on concurrent antipsychotics (chlorpromazine [CP] equivalent, 162.2 mg) at baseline remained on concurrent antipsychotics (CP equivalent, 212.5 mg) after 12 months, while, of the 66 outpatients available for follow-up, 13 (19.7%) on concurrent antipsychotics (CP equivalent, 93.4 mg) at baseline remained on concurrent antipsychotics (CP equivalent, 113.0 mg) after 12 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Study results confirmed the effectiveness and safety of the study treatment in Japanese AD patients with BPSD for up to 12 months. How best to incorporate antipsychotics into the treatment of BPSD in clinical settings lies in the hands of us Japanese clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号