Baseline characteristics

基线特征
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Graves病(GD)患者的一部分发展为难治性甲状腺功能亢进,在治疗决策中提出挑战。基线特征和早期治疗指标在识别高危个体中的预测价值是一个值得探索的领域。
    方法:一项前瞻性队列研究(2018-2022年)涉及597例新诊断的成人GD患者接受甲他咪唑(MMI)治疗。基线特征和3个月治疗参数用于建立难治性GD的预测模型,考虑抗甲状腺药物(ATD)剂量方案。
    结果:在分析的346例患者中,49.7%开发了ATD-耐火材料GD,以复发和持续的促甲状腺激素受体抗体(TRAb)阳性为标志。关键基线因素,包括年龄较小,格雷夫斯眼病(GO),较大的甲状腺肿大小,和较高的初始游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸(fT3),游离甲状腺素(fT4),和TRAb水平,都与难治性GD的风险增加显著相关,形成基线预测模型(模型A)。基于3个月时MMI累积剂量的后续分析导致两个亚组:高累积剂量组(平均≥20mg/天)和中低累积剂量组(平均<20mg/天)。绝对值,百分比变化,分析3个月时甲状腺功能和自身抗体的累积值。两个组合的预测模型,模型B(高累积剂量)和模型C(中低累积剂量),是基于逐步回归和多变量分析开发的,纳入超出基线的额外3个月参数。在这两组中,这些组合模型在辨别能力(由AUC衡量)方面优于基线模型,与实际结果一致(66.2%的综合改善),和风险分类准确性(尤其是基线预测风险<71%的I类和II类患者)。通过使用随机森林的额外分析证实了上述模型的可靠性。本研究还探讨了ATD给药方案,揭示预测风险组之间难治性结局的差异。然而,早期风险评估后调整MMI剂量并不能最终改善难治性GD的预后.
    结论:整合基线和早期治疗特征可增强难治性GD结局的预测能力。该研究为完善GD患者的风险评估和指导个性化治疗决策提供了有价值的见解。
    A subset of Graves\' disease (GD) patients develops refractory hyperthyroidism, posing challenges in treatment decisions. The predictive value of baseline characteristics and early therapy indicators in identifying high risk individuals is an area worth exploration.
    A prospective cohort study (2018-2022) involved 597 newly diagnosed adult GD patients undergoing methimazole (MMI) treatment. Baseline characteristics and 3-month therapy parameters were utilized to develop predictive models for refractory GD, considering antithyroid drug (ATD) dosage regimens.
    Among 346 patients analyzed, 49.7% developed ATD-refractory GD, marked by recurrence and sustained Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody (TRAb) positivity. Key baseline factors, including younger age, Graves\' ophthalmopathy (GO), larger goiter size, and higher initial free triiodothyronine (fT3), free thyroxine (fT4), and TRAb levels, were all significantly associated with an increased risk of refractory GD, forming the baseline predictive model (Model A). Subsequent analysis based on MMI cumulative dosage at 3 months resulted in two subgroups: a high cumulative dosage group (average ≥ 20 mg/day) and a medium-low cumulative dosage group (average < 20 mg/day). Absolute values, percentage changes, and cumulative values of thyroid function and autoantibodies at 3 months were analyzed. Two combined predictive models, Model B (high cumulative dosage) and Model C (medium-low cumulative dosage), were developed based on stepwise regression and multivariate analysis, incorporating additional 3-month parameters beyond the baseline. In both groups, these combined models outperformed the baseline model in terms of discriminative ability (measured by AUC), concordance with actual outcomes (66.2% comprehensive improvement), and risk classification accuracy (especially for Class I and II patients with baseline predictive risk < 71%). The reliability of the above models was confirmed through additional analysis using random forests. This study also explored ATD dosage regimens, revealing differences in refractory outcomes between predicted risk groups. However, adjusting MMI dosage after early risk assessment did not conclusively improve the prognosis of refractory GD.
    Integrating baseline and early therapy characteristics enhances the predictive capability for refractory GD outcomes. The study provides valuable insights into refining risk assessment and guiding personalized treatment decisions for GD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血液透析滤过(HDF)的高对流量可提高生存率;然而,目前尚不清楚是否可以在所有患者中实现.
    宣传,一项随机对照试验,1:1随机分配终末期肾病患者接受大剂量HDF与高通量血液透析(HD)延续治疗.我们评估了达到高剂量HDF目标的患者比例:基线时每次就诊的对流量≥23l(范围±1l),3月和6月。我们以以下两种方式比较了基线特征:(i)所有3次就诊的目标患者与≥1次就诊时错过目标的患者,以及(ii)所有3次就诊的目标患者或一次错过目标患者与≥2次就诊时错过目标的患者。
    总共653名患者被随机分配到HDF。他们的平均年龄为62.2(标准差13.5)岁,36%是女性,81%有瘘管血管通路,33%患有糖尿病。在3次访问中,75名患者(11%),27名患者(4%),11名患者(2%)一次未能达到对流量目标,两次,三次,分别。除了糖尿病,始终达到高剂量目标(83%)的患者与一次或多次(17%)或两次或两次以上(6%)未达到目标的患者之间,患者特征没有明显差异.
    实现高剂量HDF对于几乎所有CONVINCE患者都是可行的,并且可以在6个月的随访期内维持。除了糖尿病,在多变量分析中,没有其他可解释接受大剂量HDF的患者潜在生存优势的适应症混杂.
    UNASSIGNED: High convection volumes in hemodiafiltration (HDF) result in improved survival; however, it remains unclear whether it is achievable in all patients.
    UNASSIGNED: CONVINCE, a randomized controlled trial, randomized patients with end-stage kidney disease 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus high-flux hemodialysis (HD) continuation. We evaluated the proportion of patients achieving high-dose HDF target: convection volume per visit of ≥23 l (range ±1 l) at baseline, month 3, and month 6. We compared baseline characteristics in the following 2 ways: (i) patients on target for all 3 visits versus patients who missed target on ≥1 visits and (ii) patients on target for all 3 visits or missing it once versus patients who missed target on ≥2 visits.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 653 patients were randomized to HDF. Their mean age was 62.2 (SD 13.5) years, 36% were female, 81% had fistula vascular access, and 33% had diabetes. Across the 3 visits, 75 patients (11%), 27 patients (4%), and 11 patients (2%) missed the convection volume target once, twice, and thrice, respectively. Apart from diabetes, there were no apparent differences in patient characteristics between patients who always achieved the high-dose target (83%) and those who missed the target either once or more (17%) or twice or more (6%).
    UNASSIGNED: Achieving high-dose HDF is feasible for nearly all patients in CONVINCE and could be maintained during the 6-month follow-up period. Apart from diabetes, there were no other indications for confounding by indication on multivariable analyses that may explain the potential survival advantage for patients receiving high-dose HDF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:FOOTPRINTS®是一个有前景的,纵向,为期3年的研究评估了炎症/肺组织破坏的生物标志物与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)严重程度和进展之间的关系。这里,我们提供研究对象的基线特征并选择生物标志物.
    方法:FOOTPRINTS®的方法先前已发表。研究人群包括患有一系列COPD严重程度(全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议[GOLD]1-3期)的戒烟者,患有COPD和α-1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症(A1ATD)的戒烟者和无气流受限的戒烟者(EwAL)的对照组。在研究进入时,收集的数据是:人口统计学,疾病特征,合并症和COPD加重的病史,症状,肺功能和容量,锻炼能力,可溶性生物标志物,定量和定性计算机断层扫描。基线数据以单个GOLD和A1ATD组与EwAL组的可溶性生物标志物的描述性统计比较呈现。
    结果:总计,纳入463名受试者。每个协议集包括456名受试者,大部分为男性(64.5%)。平均(标准差)年龄为60.7(6.9)岁。在基线,肺部症状加重,肺功能变差,剩余体积增加,在GOLD1-3受试者中,随着疾病严重程度的增加,观察到肺对一氧化碳(DLco)的扩散能力降低和小叶中心肺气肿的患病率增加.A1ATD患者(n=19)的肺功能参数与GOLD2-3患者相似,与GOLD3受试者相当的高剩余量,和类似的空气捕获金2科目。与EwAL(n=61)相比,A1ATD患者肺功能较差,剩余体积增加,减少DLco,融合性或晚期破坏性肺气肿的患病率更高。可溶性炎症生物标志物白细胞计数,纤维蛋白原,GOLD1-3组的高敏C反应蛋白和血浆表面活性蛋白高于EwAL组.与GOLD和A1ATD组的受试者相比,白细胞介素-6在EwAL受试者中的表达频率较低。晚期糖基化终产物的可溶性受体在GOLD3受试者中最低,指示更严重的肺气肿。
    结论:这些发现为FOOTPRINTS®即将到来的结果提供了背景,旨在建立代表性COPD人群中生物标志物与疾病进展之间的相关性。
    背景:NCT02719184,研究开始日期2016年4月13日。
    BACKGROUND: FOOTPRINTS® is a prospective, longitudinal, 3-year study assessing the association between biomarkers of inflammation/lung tissue destruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity and progression in ex-smokers with mild-to-severe COPD. Here, we present baseline characteristics and select biomarkers of study subjects.
    METHODS: The methodology of FOOTPRINTS® has been published previously. The study population included ex-smokers with a range of COPD severities (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stages 1-3), ex-smokers with COPD and alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (A1ATD) and a control group of ex-smokers without airflow limitation (EwAL). At study entry, data were collected for: demographics, disease characteristics, history of comorbidities and COPD exacerbations, symptoms, lung function and volume, exercise capacity, soluble biomarkers, and quantitative and qualitative computed tomography. Baseline data are presented with descriptive statistical comparisons for soluble biomarkers in the individual GOLD and A1ATD groups versus EwAL.
    RESULTS: In total, 463 subjects were enrolled. The per-protocol set comprised 456 subjects, mostly male (64.5%). The mean (standard deviation) age was 60.7 (6.9) years. At baseline, increasing pulmonary symptoms, worse lung function, increased residual volume, reduced diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) and greater prevalence of centrilobular emphysema were observed with increasing disease severity amongst GOLD 1-3 subjects. Subjects with A1ATD (n = 19) had similar lung function parameters to GOLD 2-3 subjects, a high residual volume comparable to GOLD 3 subjects, and similar air trapping to GOLD 2 subjects. Compared with EwAL (n = 61), subjects with A1ATD had worse lung function, increased residual volume, reduced DLco, and a greater prevalence of confluent or advanced destructive emphysema. The soluble inflammatory biomarkers white blood cell count, fibrinogen, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and plasma surfactant protein were higher in GOLD 1-3 groups than in the EwAL group. Interleukin-6 was expressed less often in EwAL subjects compared with subjects in the GOLD and A1ATD groups. Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end product was lowest in GOLD 3 subjects, indicative of more severe emphysema.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide context for upcoming results from FOOTPRINTS®, which aims to establish correlations between biomarkers and disease progression in a representative COPD population.
    BACKGROUND: NCT02719184, study start date 13/04/2016.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Empagliflozin已被证明可降低2型糖尿病患者和心力衰竭患者心血管不良结局的风险。依帕列净对急性心肌梗死(AMI)后患者的影响尚不清楚。
    结果:测试Empagliflozin对急性心肌梗死患者心力衰竭住院和死亡率的影响的研究(EMPACT-MI)试验筛选了6610名AMI患者,并随机分配6522名接受依帕列净或安慰剂治疗。中位(四分位数)年龄为64(56-71)岁,75.1%的患者为男性。主要合并症包括高血压(69.1%),2型糖尿病(31.7%),既往心肌梗死(13.0%),房颤(10.9%)。大多数(74.3%)的患者出现ST段抬高型心肌梗死。总的来说,56.9%的患者有需要治疗的急性充血体征或症状,78.3%的患者有左心室收缩功能障碍,射血分数<45%。临床特征,包括基线人口统计,血运重建率,出院时的心血管药物在很大程度上与近期AMI后人群的试验相当.
    结论:EMPACT-MI试验将确定empagliflozin治疗AMI患者的益处和风险。
    Empagliflozin has been shown to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and in those with heart failure. The impact of empagliflozin in post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is unknown.
    The Study to Test the Effect of Empagliflozin on Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (EMPACT-MI) trial screened 6610 participants with AMI and randomized 6522 to empagliflozin or placebo in addition to standard of care. The median (interquartile) age was 64 (56-71) years and 75.1% of patients were male. Major comorbidities included hypertension (69.1%), type 2 diabetes (31.7%), prior myocardial infarction (13.0%), and atrial fibrillation (10.9%). The majority (74.3%) of patients presented with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Overall, 56.9% of patients had acute signs or symptoms of congestion requiring treatment and 78.3% had left ventricular systolic dysfunction with ejection fraction <45%. Clinical characteristics, including baseline demographics, rates of revascularization, and cardiovascular medications at discharge were largely comparable to recent trials of the post-AMI population.
    The EMPACT-MI trial will establish the benefit and risks of empagliflozin treatment in patients with AMI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:确定对某些干预措施有不同反应的患者的特征称为治疗效果调节剂。一些研究不适当地报告了治疗效果调节剂的存在,而没有适当的研究设计。
    目的:评估在主要的物理治疗期刊上发表的单组研究的比例不适当地报告了治疗效果调节剂,并评估比例是否随时间或期刊之间的变化而变化。
    方法:对自2000年以来发表在八种主要物理治疗期刊上的研究进行了系统综述。符合条件的研究是单组研究(例如,队列研究或随机对照试验治疗组的二次分析)调查任何情况,治疗或结果。研究表明,具有某些基线特征的参与者对治疗的反应更好或更差。被认为报告不当。研究报告具有某些基线特征的参与者有改善的结果,但没有说明这是由于治疗被认为是适当的报告。随着时间的推移和期刊之间的不适当报告的比例进行了比较。
    结果:在纳入的145项研究中,73(50.3%)被归类为不适当报告的治疗效果调节剂。不适当报告的比例在最近一个时期最高,2018-2022年(59.6%)和2006-2011年(55.6%)。不适当报告的比例在期刊之间差异很大,从0%(物理治疗杂志)到91.7%(神经物理治疗杂志)。
    结论:在领先的物理治疗期刊中,很大比例(50.3%)的单臂研究不适当地报告了治疗效果调节剂。在为个别患者选择干预措施时,这种不适当的报告可能会误导临床医生。
    BACKGROUND: Characteristics that identify patients who respond differently to certain interventions are called treatment effect modifiers. Some studies inappropriately report the presence of treatment effect modifiers without adequate study designs.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate what proportion of single-group studies published in leading physical therapy journals inappropriately report treatment effect modifiers, and to assess whether the proportion varies over time or between journals.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of studies published in eight leading physical therapy journals since 2000. Eligible studies were single-group studies (e.g., cohort study or secondary analysis of treatment arm of randomised controlled trial) that investigated any condition, treatment or outcome. Studies that suggested participants with certain baseline characteristics responded better/or worse to the treatment, were considered to have reported inappropriately. Studies reporting that participants with certain baseline characteristics had improved outcomes but did not state it was due to the treatment were considered to have reported appropriately. The proportion of inappropriate reporting was compared over time and between journals.
    RESULTS: Of the 145 included studies, 73 (50.3%) were categorised as inappropriately reporting treatment effect modifiers. The proportion of inappropriate reporting was highest in the most recent period, 2018 - 2022 (59.6%) and 2006 - 2011 (55.6%). The proportion of inappropriate reporting varied substantially between journals from 0% (Journal of Physiotherapy) to 91.7% (Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy).
    CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion (50.3%) of single-arm studies in leading physical therapy journals inappropriately report treatment effect modifiers. This inappropriate reporting risks misleading clinicians when selecting interventions for individual patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脊柱随机对照试验中最近的欺诈行为迹象质疑该领域试验的完整性。RCT特别重要,因为它们在指导治疗决策方面具有重要意义,因此,确保RCT的可靠性至关重要。这项研究调查了发表在脊柱期刊上的所谓RCT中存在非随机基线频率数据。
    方法:进行了PubMed搜索,以获取在四个脊柱期刊上发表的所有RCT(Spine,脊柱杂志,神经外科脊柱杂志,和欧洲脊柱杂志)在2016年1月至2020年12月之间。提取基线频率数据,和可变p值使用皮尔逊卡方检验计算。使用Stouffer方法将每个研究的这些p值组合成研究的p值。对p值低于0.01和0.05以及高于0.95和0.99的研究进行了综述。将结果与卡莱尔2017年的麻醉和重症监护医学随机对照调查进行比较。
    结果:纳入了228项研究中的147项。研究方面的p值与预期的真正随机实验基本一致。观察到高于0.99的研究p值略高于预期,但是其中一些有很好的解释来解释这种过剩。与麻醉和重症监护医学文献的类似调查相比,观察到的按研究p值的分布与预期分布更接近。
    结论:调查的数据没有显示系统性欺诈行为的证据。发现主要脊柱期刊中的脊柱随机对照试验与真正的随机分配和实验得出的数据一致。
    Recent signs of fraudulent behaviour in spine RCTs have queried the integrity of trials in the field. RCTs are particularly important due to the weight they are accorded in guiding treatment decisions, and thus, ensuring RCTs\' reliability is crucial. This study investigates the presence of non-random baseline frequency data in purported RCTs published in spine journals.
    A PubMed search was performed to obtain all RCTs published in four spine journals (Spine, The Spine Journal, the Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, and European Spine Journal) between Jan-2016 and Dec-2020. Baseline frequency data were extracted, and variable-wise p values were calculated using the Pearson Chi-squared test. These p values were combined for each study into study-wise p values using the Stouffer method. Studies with p values below 0.01 and 0.05 and those above 0.95 and 0.99 were reviewed. Results were compared to Carlisle\'s 2017 survey of anaesthesia and critical care medicine RCTs.
    One hundred sixty-seven of the 228 studies identified were included. Study-wise p values were largely consistent with expected genuine randomized experiments. Slightly more study-wise p values above 0.99 were observed than expected, but a number of these had good explanations to account for that excess. The distribution of observed study-wise p values was more closely matched to the expected distribution than those in a similar survey of the anaesthesia and critical care medicine literature.
    The data surveyed do not show evidence of systemic fraudulent behaviour. Spine RCTs in major spine journals were found to be consistent with genuine random allocation and experimentally derived data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:心房颤动(AF)容易发生心力衰竭和中风。早期管理可有效降低脑卒中发生率和死亡率。目前的临床指南仅根据年龄筛选高危人群,而这项研究旨在探索其他AF风险预测因子的可能性。
    UNASSIGNED:共有18,738名中国社区的老年人(60岁以上)参加了这项研究。基线特征主要依据随访时心电图机的诊断结果,附有一些辅助体检的基本资料。在分析了独立和组合的基线特征之后,获得AF风险预测因子并根据结果进行优先级排序。从三个方面研究了独立特性:卡方检验,Mann-WhitneyU检验和Cox单因素回归分析。从机器学习模型和Cox多元回归分析两个方面研究了组合特征,前者结合了递归特征消除法和投票决定法。
    未经评估:所得出的风险预测因子的最佳组合包括年龄,房性早搏,房扑,左心室肥厚,高血压和心脏病.
    UASSIGNED:通过短时心电图机诊断为发生上述事件的患者发生房颤的概率较高,建议将其纳入长期心电图监测或增加筛查密度的重点。在不同年龄范围的房颤患者中,风险预测因子的发生率表明在特定年龄的患者管理方面存在差异。这有助于提高AF的检出率,规范患者管理,减缓房颤的进展。
    UNASSIGNED: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prone to heart failure and stroke. Early management can effectively reduce the stroke rate and mortality. Current clinical guidelines screen high-risk individuals based solely on age, while this study aims to explore the possibility of other AF risk predictors.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 18,738 elderly people (aged over 60 years old) in Chinese communities were enrolled in this study. The baseline characteristics were mainly based on the diagnosis results of electrocardiogram (ECG) machine during follow up, accompanied by some auxiliary physical examination basic data. After the analysis of both independent and combined baseline characteristics, AF risk predictors were obtained and prioritized according to the results. Independent characteristics were studied from three aspects: Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test and Cox univariate regression analysis. Combined characteristics were studied from two aspects: machine learning models and Cox multivariate regression analysis, and the former was combined with recursive feature elimination method and voting decision.
    UNASSIGNED: The resulted optimal combination of risk predictors included age, atrial premature beats, atrial flutter, left ventricular hypertrophy, hypertension and heart disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed by short-time ECG machines with the occurrence of the above events had a higher probability of AF episodes, who are suggested to be included in the focus of long-term ECG monitoring or increased screening density. The incidence of risk predictors in different age ranges of AF patients suggests differences in age-specific patient management. This can help improve the detection rate of AF, standardize the management of patients, and slow down the progression of AF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:常规结果监测(ROM)已成为改善心理治疗过程和结果的有力候选者。然而,它的使用和实施在拉丁美洲被大大低估。因此,在阿根廷进行的本试点研究的目的是实施一个ROM和反馈系统,该系统基于一种心理测量健全的仪器,以测量心理治疗中的会话结果。
    未经评估:样本由40名患者和13名治疗师组成。在基线,患者完成了患者健康问卷-9和广泛性焦虑症-7,他们还在前5个疗程之前完成了Hopkins症状自评量表-11.要估计第一次治疗期间患者的变化,我们使用分层线性模型进行了定量分析。此外,我们使用合意定性研究进行了定性分析,以分析治疗师对ROM和反馈系统的看法.
    UNASSIGNED:结果显示前5个疗程患者的症状严重程度显著降低。此外,基线抑郁显著预测了第五次疗程结束时估计的严重程度.根据这些分析,在前四个疗程后,向治疗师提供了反馈。关于反馈系统的感知,临床医生强调了其实用性和用户友好性。他们还提到,提供的信息与他们的临床判断之间存在匹配。此外,他们提供了建议,以增强在新的和改进的版本中合并的系统。
    未授权:讨论了局限性和临床意义。
    UNASSIGNED: Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) has emerged as a strong candidate to improve psychotherapy processes and outcome. However, its use and implementation are greatly understudied in Latin-America. Therefore, the aim of the present pilot study conducted in Argentina was to implement a ROM and feedback system grounded on a psychometrically sound instrument to measure session by session outcome in psychotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: The sample consisted of 40 patients and 13 therapists. At baseline, the patients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and they also completed the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-11 before each of the first five sessions. To estimate patient change during the first sessions, we conducted a quantitative analysis using Hierarchical Linear Models. Furthermore, we conducted a qualitative analysis using Consensual Qualitative Research to analyze therapist perception regarding the ROM and feedback system.
    UNASSIGNED: Results showed a significant reduction in patients\' symptomatic severity during the first five sessions. Additionally, baseline depression significantly predicted the estimated severity at the end of the fifth session. Feedback was given to the therapists after the first four sessions based on these analyses. With regard to the perception of the feedback system, clinicians underlined its usefulness and user-friendly nature. They also mentioned that there was a match between the information provided and their clinical judgment. Furthermore, they provided suggestions to enhance the system that was incorporated in a new and improved version.
    UNASSIGNED: Limitations and clinical implications are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:我们在2020年1月至9月之间从HCA医疗保健企业数据仓库中提取数据,对患有和不患有痴呆症的COVID-19患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。
    未经评估:描述患者的基线特征,特别是痴呆在确定COVID-19患者整体健康结局中的作用。
    UNASSIGNED:我们将患有痴呆(DM)ICD-10编码的住院患者与年龄和性别匹配(1:2)的无痴呆(ND)患者分组。我们的主要结果变量是住院死亡率,逗留时间,重症监护病房(ICU)入院,无ICU天数,机械通气(MV)的使用,无MV日和90天重新入场。
    UNASSIGNED:匹配在DM和ND组中提供了相似的年龄和性别。BMI(中位数,25.8vs.27.6)和吸烟患者的比例(23.3vs.31.3%)DM患者低于ND患者。痴呆症患者的中位数(IQR)Elixhauser合并症指数高于7(5-10)。5(3-7,p<0.01)。在DM组中观察到更高的死亡率(30.8%)与ND组(26.4%,p<0.01)作为未调整的单变量分析。90天的再入院没有什么不同(32.1与31.8%,p=0.8)。在逻辑回归分析中,DM组和ND组患者的死亡几率没有差异(OR=1.0;95%CI0.86-1.17),但痴呆患者入住ICU的几率显著较低(OR=0.58,95%CI0.51-0.66).
    未经评估:我们的数据显示,COVID-19痴呆症患者的情况并没有明显恶化,但事实上,当考虑某些指标时,情况会更好。
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on COVID-19 patients with and without dementia by extracting data from the HCA Healthcare Enterprise Data Warehouse between January-September 2020.
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the role of patients\' baseline characteristics specifically dementia in determining overall health outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We grouped in-patients who had ICD-10 codes for dementia (DM) with age and gender-matched (1:2) patients without dementia (ND). Our primary outcome variables were in-hospital mortality, length of stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, ICU-free days, mechanical ventilation (MV) use, MV-free days and 90-day re-admission.
    UNASSIGNED: Matching provided similar age and sex in DM and ND groups. BMI (median, 25.8 vs. 27.6) and proportion of patients who had smoked (23.3 vs. 31.3%) were lower in DM than in ND patients. The median (IQR) Elixhauser Comorbidity Index was higher in dementia patients 7 (5-10) vs. 5 (3-7, p < 0.01). Higher mortality was observed in DM group (30.8%) vs. ND group (26.4%, p < 0.01) as an unadjusted univariate analysis. The 90-day readmission was not different (32.1 vs. 31.8%, p = 0.8). In logistic regression analysis, the odds of dying were not different between patients in DM and ND groups (OR = 1.0; 95% CI 0.86-1.17), but the odds of ICU admissions were significantly lower for dementia patients (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.51-0.66).
    UNASSIGNED: Our data showed that COVID-19 patients with dementia did not fare substantially worse, but in fact, fared better when certain metrics were considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号