UNASSIGNED: The role of atherectomy in treating femoropopliteal disease has been evolving rapidly. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of adjunctive atherectomy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty (BA) (plain balloon and drug-coated BA) remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (ABA) versus BA alone in treating femoropopliteal disease.
UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception through January 10, 2022) for studies comparing ABA versus BA for femoropopliteal disease. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, and bailout stenting were the primary outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Nine studies with 699 patients were included (4 randomized and 5 retrospective studies). Compared to BA alone, the ABA group showed a significant decrease in TLR driven by nonrandomized studies (RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P = .005) and bailout stenting (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in TLR when the analysis was performed including only randomized trials. There was no significant difference in the primary patency between the 2 groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14; P = .37).
UNASSIGNED: Data from randomized trials suggest that compared with BA alone, the combination of atherectomy and BA showed no difference in TLR or primary patency. In observational studies, TLR and bailout stenting were reduced in ABA group but there was no difference in primary patency. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA in femoropopliteal lesions compared with BA alone.

UNASSIGNED: Calcified coronary lesions are a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel calcium modification technology approved for commercial use in February 2021, but little is known about its uptake in US clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: We described trends in use of calcium modification strategies, variation in use across hospitals, and predictors of calcium modification and IVL use in PCI. We included National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry patients who underwent PCI between April 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. We examined trends and hospital variation in calcium modification and IVL use. We used multivariate hierarchical logistic regression to identify predictors of calcium modification and IVL use at hospitals in 2022.
UNASSIGNED: Of 2,733,494 PCIs across 1676 hospitals over 4.75 years, 11.4% were performed with calcium modification. Coronary IVL use increased rapidly from 0% of PCIs in Q4 2020 to 7.8% of PCIs in Q4 2022, which was accompanied by an overall increase in use of all calcium modification strategies (11.1%-16.0%) during this period with a slight corresponding decrease in coronary atherectomy use (5.4%-4.4%). In 2022, there was wide variation in IVL use across hospitals (median, 3.86%; IQR, 0%-8.19%), with IVL being the most common calcium modification strategy in 48% of hospitals. The treating hospital was the strongest predictor of calcium modification (median odds ratio [OR], 2.49; 95% CI, 2.40-2.57) and IVL use (median OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.74-3.04).
UNASSIGNED: IVL has rapidly changed the landscape of calcium modification use for PCI, although there remains wide variation across hospitals.

UNASSIGNED: Common femoral artery (CFA) disease is often heavily calcified and prone to low patency rates with endovascular treatment compared with surgical endarterectomy. Recent data suggest promising short-term outcomes with the adjunct use of intravascular lithotripsy; however, data on its midterm effectiveness are lacking. We compared clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) between patients receiving drug-coated balloon angioplasty with adjunct intravascular lithotripsy (IVL-DCB) vs adjunct atherectomy (Ath-DCB) for treatment of CFA disease.
UNASSIGNED: In a single-center retrospective cohort study, patients receiving IVL-DCB vs Ath-DCB for symptomatic CFA disease from January 2015 to March 2020 were included. The primary outcome was cumulative CD-TLR with angiographic restenosis ≥50%, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis during 18-month follow-up and compared by log-rank test.
UNASSIGNED: Total of 68 CFA lesions (Ath-DCB, 35; IVL-DCB, 33) were included. Patients had a mean age (standard deviation) of 72 (8) years and were predominantly male (63.3%) and White (92%). Mean baseline angiographic stenosis was 78% (11) in the Ath-DCB group and 70% (10) in the IVL-DCB group (P = .002). Technical success was 100% in both groups. One flow-limiting dissection occurred in IVL-DCB requiring stent placement, whereas 2 bailout stentings were performed in the Ath-DCB group. Cumulative Kaplan-Meier freedom from CD-TLR was 91.2% (95% CI, 81.6%-100%) in the Ath-DCB group vs 79.4% (95% CI, 64.6%-94.2%) in the IVL-DCB group (Log-rank P = .167).
UNASSIGNED: The safety and effectiveness of IVL-DCB were comparable to those of Ath-DCB in the treatment of calcified CFA disease during the 18-month follow-up. Further studies are required to verify these findings.

Coronary calcified lesions are commonly encountered and coronary atherectomy is commonly used for lesion modification during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The release of adenosine during atherectomy can result in bradyarrhythmias and aminophylline is commonly used to prevent this reaction. We identified 138 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy. A total of 159 calcified lesions were treated, and the atherectomy device was orbital atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, and both in 52 %, 42 %, and 6 %; respectively. After administration of aminophylline, 4.3 % of patients required intraprocedural insertion of a transvenous pacer (TVP), and 18.1 % of patients required administration of IV atropine. Technical success was achieved in 98.6 % of patients, and no adverse reactions to aminophylline were reported. All patients survived to discharge. In conclusion, aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy was safe and effective. No adverse effects of aminophylline were seen, and the rate of bailout TVP placement was low.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) represent 4% of all PCIs for stable angina in the United States and have been associated with lower success and higher in-hospital event rates compared with non-CTO PCIs. We aimed to examine long-term outcomes of CTO PCI compared with non-CTO PCI, including prespecified subgroups of high-risk non-CTO PCI (atherectomy/saphenous vein graft/unprotected left main).
UNASSIGNED: Among 551,722 patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry linked to Medicare (July 2009-December 2016), we evaluated in-hospital events and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events of CTO PCIs (N = 29,407) compared with non-CTO PCIs (N = 522,315). We then evaluated similar outcomes between CTO PCIs and high-risk non-CTO PCIs (N = 53,662). We excluded patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing CTO PCI were more likely to be younger and male. CTO PCI was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital events compared with non-CTO PCI (7.0% vs 4.2%; P < .001) and high-risk non-CTO PCI (7.0% vs 6.5%; P = .008). In addition, CTO PCI was associated with a slightly higher risk of long-term repeat revascularization compared with non-CTO PCI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13). However, compared with high-risk non-CTO PCIs, CTO PCIs were associated with a slightly lower risk of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90) and readmission (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90).
UNASSIGNED: In this study, CTO PCI was associated with higher risk of both in-hospital and out-of-hospital events but a slightly lower risk of long-term events compared with high-risk non-CTO PCIs. These findings shed light on the complexity of various PCI procedures that can inform clinicians and patients of expected outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare one year outcomes after atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy vs. plain balloon angioplasty before application of drug coated balloons for treating femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were screened until May 2023 for randomised controlled trials.
METHODS: This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were patients with claudication and those with critical limb threatening ischaemia with lesion characteristics of all lengths, stenosis, calcification, and occlusions. Primary outcome was freedom from target lesion re-intervention at one year. Secondary outcomes were rate of bailout stenting, major amputation, and all-cause mortality at one year. Pooled point estimates were calculated with a standard random effects model. Further sensitivity analyses were completed with a mixed treatment Bayesian model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 (RoB2) and certainty of evidence assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
RESULTS: Four RCTs comprising 549 patients (two studies evaluating directional atherectomy, one evaluating rotational atherectomy, one evaluating intravascular lithotripsy against plain balloon angioplasty) were included. Weighted mean length of femoropopliteal lesions was 103.4 ± 6.67 mm. Results of the mixed treatment Bayesian analysis were consistent with pooled analysis for all outcomes. There were no significant differences in freedom from target lesion revascularisation (GRADE, high) (RoB2, low), major amputation (GRADE, low), or mortality (GRADE, moderate). Bailout stenting rates were significantly reduced with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy compared with plain balloon angioplasty (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.89) (GRADE, moderate) (RoB2, low).
CONCLUSIONS: This review found that intravascular lithotripsy or atherectomy did not appear to incur a statistically significant advantage in freedom from target lesion revascularisation, major amputation, or mortality at one year. There was moderate certainty of evidence that bailout stenting is significantly reduced after vessel preparation with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy.

An 83-year-old woman with claudication in the right lower extremity was referred to our hospital. Since angiography showed severe stenosis with a severely calcified lesion extending from the ostial to proximal part of the right superficial femoral artery (SFA), endovascular therapy (EVT) with the Jetstream™ atherectomy system (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) and paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) was performed. Atherectomy was performed using the Jetstream™ atherectomy catheter SC 1.85, followed by an additional atherectomy using the Jetstream™ atherectomy catheter XC 2.1/3.0. Subsequently, angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images showed the enlargement of lumen area due to the reduction of calcified plaque, but even some of the healthy media on the side free of calcified plaque had been removed. Next, a PCB dilation was performed, and the final angiography showed adequate dilation. However, the symptoms recurred 9 months after EVT. Angiography revealed an enlarged vessel suggestive of pseudoaneurysm at the ostial part of the right SFA and severe stenosis distal to the enlarged vessel. IVUS images showed a pseudoaneurysm and severe stenosis due to calcified nodules distal to the pseudoaneurysm. This case suggests that pseudoaneurysm is a potential complication of EVT with the Jetstream™ atherectomy system and PCB for SFA lesions.
UNASSIGNED: The Jetstream™ atherectomy system (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) has developed to improve outcomes for femoropopliteal artery lesions with severely calcified lesions in lower extremity arterial disease by removing calcified plaque and improving vascular compliance. Several clinical reports demonstrated durable patency rates and low complication rates after endovascular therapy using the atherectomy device. However, pseudoaneurysm is a potential complication of endovascular therapy with the Jetstream™ atherectomy system.

BACKGROUND: With an aging population and an increase in the comorbidity burden of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the management of coronary calcification for optimal PCI is critical in contemporary practice.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the trends and outcomes of coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), rotational/orbital atherectomy, or both among patients who underwent PCI in Michigan.
METHODS: We included all PCIs between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, performed at 48 Michigan hospitals. Outcomes included in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and procedural success.
RESULTS: IVL was used in 1,090 patients (2.57%), atherectomy was used in 1,743 (4.10%) patients, and both were used in 240 patients (0.57% of all PCIs). IVL use increased from 0.04% of PCI cases in January 2021 to 4.28% of cases in June 2022, ultimately exceeding the rate of atherectomy use. The rate of MACEs (4.3% vs 5.4%; P = 0.23) and procedural success (89.4% vs 89.1%; P = 0.88) were similar among patients treated with IVL compared with atherectomy, respectively. Only 15.6% of patients treated with IVL in contemporary practice were similar to the population enrolled in the pivotal IVL trials. Among such patients (n = 169), the rate of MACEs (0.0%) and procedural success (94.7%) were similar to the outcomes reported in the pivotal IVL trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Since its introduction in February 2021, coronary IVL use has steadily increased, exceeding atherectomy use in Michigan by February 2022. Contemporary use of IVL and atherectomy is generally associated with high rates of procedural success and low rates of complications.

Calcific coronary artery stenosis is a complex disease associated with adverse outcomes and suboptimal percutaneous treatment. Calcium plaque modification has emerged as a key strategy to tackle the issues that accompany calcific stenosis - namely reduced device deliverability, unpredictable lesion characteristics, and difficult dilatation. Atherectomy has traditionally been the treatment modality of choice for heavily calcified coronary stenoses. Contemporary technologies have emerged to aid with planning, preparation, and treatment of calcified coronary stenosis in an attempt to improve procedural success and long-term outcomes. In this State Of The Art Review, we synthesize the body of data surrounding the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of calcific coronary disease, with a focus on i) intravascular imaging, ii) calcific lesion preparation, iii) treatment modalities including atherectomy, and iv) updated treatment algorithms for the management of calcified coronary stenosis.