Calcified and resistant narrowing of arteries poses significant difficulty in performing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), as they increase the risk of subpar outcomes leading to worse clinical outcomes. Despite the existence of dedicated technologies and devices, including various balloons and atherectomy systems, they often do not ensure sufficient plaque modification and ideal vessel preparation for optimal stent deployment. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a technology originally developed for urological procedures, has recently been used to safely and selectively disrupt calcified depositions in both peripheral and coronary arteries by sonic waves that seamlessly transfer to nearby tissue, enhancing vessel compliance with minimal impact on soft tissues. In the coronary arteries, the use of IVL plays a role in the process of \"vessel preparation\" before the placement of stents, which is crucial for restoring blood flow in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD), and is considered a minimally invasive technique, reducing the need for open heart surgeries and associated risks and complications. Studies have shown that IVL can lead to improved procedural success rates and favorable long-term outcomes for patients with severely calcified coronary artery disease. With the advent of IVL, the disruption of severe calcification of coronary artery and stenotic lesions before stent implantations can be performed. Despite promising data for treating calcified lesions, IVL is significantly underutilized in clinical practice, long-term clinical data and extensive research are needed to validate its further safety and efficacy. In this article, we reviewed the literature discussing the use of IVL in the coronary arteries as an approach for addressing intravascular atherosclerotic plaques, particularly focusing on heavily calcified plaques that are resistant to standard initial PCI, while also evaluating its safety in comparison to alternative methods.

UNASSIGNED: The role of atherectomy in treating femoropopliteal disease has been evolving rapidly. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of adjunctive atherectomy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty (BA) (plain balloon and drug-coated BA) remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (ABA) versus BA alone in treating femoropopliteal disease.
UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception through January 10, 2022) for studies comparing ABA versus BA for femoropopliteal disease. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, and bailout stenting were the primary outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Nine studies with 699 patients were included (4 randomized and 5 retrospective studies). Compared to BA alone, the ABA group showed a significant decrease in TLR driven by nonrandomized studies (RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P = .005) and bailout stenting (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in TLR when the analysis was performed including only randomized trials. There was no significant difference in the primary patency between the 2 groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14; P = .37).
UNASSIGNED: Data from randomized trials suggest that compared with BA alone, the combination of atherectomy and BA showed no difference in TLR or primary patency. In observational studies, TLR and bailout stenting were reduced in ABA group but there was no difference in primary patency. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA in femoropopliteal lesions compared with BA alone.

UNASSIGNED: Calcified coronary lesions are a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel calcium modification technology approved for commercial use in February 2021, but little is known about its uptake in US clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: We described trends in use of calcium modification strategies, variation in use across hospitals, and predictors of calcium modification and IVL use in PCI. We included National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry patients who underwent PCI between April 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. We examined trends and hospital variation in calcium modification and IVL use. We used multivariate hierarchical logistic regression to identify predictors of calcium modification and IVL use at hospitals in 2022.
UNASSIGNED: Of 2,733,494 PCIs across 1676 hospitals over 4.75 years, 11.4% were performed with calcium modification. Coronary IVL use increased rapidly from 0% of PCIs in Q4 2020 to 7.8% of PCIs in Q4 2022, which was accompanied by an overall increase in use of all calcium modification strategies (11.1%-16.0%) during this period with a slight corresponding decrease in coronary atherectomy use (5.4%-4.4%). In 2022, there was wide variation in IVL use across hospitals (median, 3.86%; IQR, 0%-8.19%), with IVL being the most common calcium modification strategy in 48% of hospitals. The treating hospital was the strongest predictor of calcium modification (median odds ratio [OR], 2.49; 95% CI, 2.40-2.57) and IVL use (median OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.74-3.04).
UNASSIGNED: IVL has rapidly changed the landscape of calcium modification use for PCI, although there remains wide variation across hospitals.

UNASSIGNED: Common femoral artery (CFA) disease is often heavily calcified and prone to low patency rates with endovascular treatment compared with surgical endarterectomy. Recent data suggest promising short-term outcomes with the adjunct use of intravascular lithotripsy; however, data on its midterm effectiveness are lacking. We compared clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) between patients receiving drug-coated balloon angioplasty with adjunct intravascular lithotripsy (IVL-DCB) vs adjunct atherectomy (Ath-DCB) for treatment of CFA disease.
UNASSIGNED: In a single-center retrospective cohort study, patients receiving IVL-DCB vs Ath-DCB for symptomatic CFA disease from January 2015 to March 2020 were included. The primary outcome was cumulative CD-TLR with angiographic restenosis ≥50%, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis during 18-month follow-up and compared by log-rank test.
UNASSIGNED: Total of 68 CFA lesions (Ath-DCB, 35; IVL-DCB, 33) were included. Patients had a mean age (standard deviation) of 72 (8) years and were predominantly male (63.3%) and White (92%). Mean baseline angiographic stenosis was 78% (11) in the Ath-DCB group and 70% (10) in the IVL-DCB group (P = .002). Technical success was 100% in both groups. One flow-limiting dissection occurred in IVL-DCB requiring stent placement, whereas 2 bailout stentings were performed in the Ath-DCB group. Cumulative Kaplan-Meier freedom from CD-TLR was 91.2% (95% CI, 81.6%-100%) in the Ath-DCB group vs 79.4% (95% CI, 64.6%-94.2%) in the IVL-DCB group (Log-rank P = .167).
UNASSIGNED: The safety and effectiveness of IVL-DCB were comparable to those of Ath-DCB in the treatment of calcified CFA disease during the 18-month follow-up. Further studies are required to verify these findings.

Coronary calcified lesions are commonly encountered and coronary atherectomy is commonly used for lesion modification during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The release of adenosine during atherectomy can result in bradyarrhythmias and aminophylline is commonly used to prevent this reaction. We identified 138 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy. A total of 159 calcified lesions were treated, and the atherectomy device was orbital atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, and both in 52 %, 42 %, and 6 %; respectively. After administration of aminophylline, 4.3 % of patients required intraprocedural insertion of a transvenous pacer (TVP), and 18.1 % of patients required administration of IV atropine. Technical success was achieved in 98.6 % of patients, and no adverse reactions to aminophylline were reported. All patients survived to discharge. In conclusion, aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy was safe and effective. No adverse effects of aminophylline were seen, and the rate of bailout TVP placement was low.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) represent 4% of all PCIs for stable angina in the United States and have been associated with lower success and higher in-hospital event rates compared with non-CTO PCIs. We aimed to examine long-term outcomes of CTO PCI compared with non-CTO PCI, including prespecified subgroups of high-risk non-CTO PCI (atherectomy/saphenous vein graft/unprotected left main).
UNASSIGNED: Among 551,722 patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry linked to Medicare (July 2009-December 2016), we evaluated in-hospital events and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events of CTO PCIs (N = 29,407) compared with non-CTO PCIs (N = 522,315). We then evaluated similar outcomes between CTO PCIs and high-risk non-CTO PCIs (N = 53,662). We excluded patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing CTO PCI were more likely to be younger and male. CTO PCI was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital events compared with non-CTO PCI (7.0% vs 4.2%; P < .001) and high-risk non-CTO PCI (7.0% vs 6.5%; P = .008). In addition, CTO PCI was associated with a slightly higher risk of long-term repeat revascularization compared with non-CTO PCI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13). However, compared with high-risk non-CTO PCIs, CTO PCIs were associated with a slightly lower risk of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90) and readmission (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90).
UNASSIGNED: In this study, CTO PCI was associated with higher risk of both in-hospital and out-of-hospital events but a slightly lower risk of long-term events compared with high-risk non-CTO PCIs. These findings shed light on the complexity of various PCI procedures that can inform clinicians and patients of expected outcomes.

An 83-year-old woman with claudication in the right lower extremity was referred to our hospital. Since angiography showed severe stenosis with a severely calcified lesion extending from the ostial to proximal part of the right superficial femoral artery (SFA), endovascular therapy (EVT) with the Jetstream™ atherectomy system (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) and paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) was performed. Atherectomy was performed using the Jetstream™ atherectomy catheter SC 1.85, followed by an additional atherectomy using the Jetstream™ atherectomy catheter XC 2.1/3.0. Subsequently, angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images showed the enlargement of lumen area due to the reduction of calcified plaque, but even some of the healthy media on the side free of calcified plaque had been removed. Next, a PCB dilation was performed, and the final angiography showed adequate dilation. However, the symptoms recurred 9 months after EVT. Angiography revealed an enlarged vessel suggestive of pseudoaneurysm at the ostial part of the right SFA and severe stenosis distal to the enlarged vessel. IVUS images showed a pseudoaneurysm and severe stenosis due to calcified nodules distal to the pseudoaneurysm. This case suggests that pseudoaneurysm is a potential complication of EVT with the Jetstream™ atherectomy system and PCB for SFA lesions.
UNASSIGNED: The Jetstream™ atherectomy system (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) has developed to improve outcomes for femoropopliteal artery lesions with severely calcified lesions in lower extremity arterial disease by removing calcified plaque and improving vascular compliance. Several clinical reports demonstrated durable patency rates and low complication rates after endovascular therapy using the atherectomy device. However, pseudoaneurysm is a potential complication of endovascular therapy with the Jetstream™ atherectomy system.

Although intravascular atherectomy is widely used for debulking calcified atheromas in peripheral arterial disease, it is associated with complications. Delayed rupture with pseudoaneurysm formation is rare. We report the case of a 73-year-old man who developed a 24 mm×20 mm×27 mm popliteal artery (PA) pseudoaneurysm after rotational atherectomy. Initially, the patient presented with intermittent claudication. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) showed a severely calcified atheroma in the PA. Rotational atherectomy was performed using the Jetstream™ device (Boston Scientific). Postoperatively, the ankle-brachial index and symptoms improved. However, 6 days after the atherectomy, the patient complained of calf pain and swelling. Follow-up CTA revealed a pseudoaneurysm and hematoma in the popliteal fossa. Open conversion with removal of the heavily calcified plaque and patch angioplasty were performed via the posterior approach. Delayed PA rupture and pseudoaneurysm formation after rotational atherectomy are rare; however, they require prompt management.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy has become established as a first-line therapy in most arterial regions. However, open vascular surgery (endarterectomy) remains the treatment of choice for common femoral artery (CFA) lesions. The aim of this study is to investigate the acute and mid-term results of directional atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) in comparison to endarterectomy in treatment of de novo arteriosclerotic CFA lesions.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter non-inferiority study will enroll 306 participants with symptomatic (Rutherford category 1 to 5) de novo stenosis of the CFA including the bifurcation. Patients eligible for both treatment groups could be included in this 1:1 randomized trial. Primary efficacy endpoint is patency of the target lesion at 12 months defined as restenosis < 50% without the need of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR). Primary safety endpoint is a combined endpoint including death, myocardial infarction, major or minor amputation of the target limb, and peri-procedural complications at 30 days. Secondary endpoints include primary patency of the target lesion at 6 and 24 months, secondary patency, cdTLR 6, 12, and 24 months, change in ankle-brachial index, and Rutherford-Becker class at 6, 12, and 24 months. Limb salvage, change in quality of life measured by Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and major adverse events including death, myocardial infarction, and minor or major amputation of the target limb will be determined at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of CFA lesions is still a matter of debate. Few studies compared modern endovascular therapy methods against the so-called gold standard surgical endarterectomy so far. Based on recent positive results, this study aims to confirm non-inferiority of a \"leaving nothing behind\" endovascular approach combining directional atherectomy and DCB compared to surgical therapy.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02517827.