Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is an autoimmune disorder associated with various pathological pregnancies, such as recurrent miscarriage, stillbirth, severe pre-eclampsia and severe placental insufficiency. The persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) is the most important laboratory characteristic of OAPS. OAPS severely affects the reproductive health of women of childbearing age in China. Reports indicate that approximately 9.6% stillbirths, 11.5% severe pre-eclampsia, and 54% recurrent miscarriages are associated with OAPS or aPLs. However, the pathogenesis of OAPS remains unclear. Previously, thrombosis at the maternal-fetal interface (MFI) was considered the main mechanism of OAPS-related pathological pregnancies. Consequently, the use of low molecular weight heparin and aspirin throughout pregnancy was recommended to improve outcomes in OAPS patient. In recent years, many studies have found that thrombosis in MFI is uncommon, but various inflammatory factors are significantly increased in the MFI of OAPS patients. Based on these findings, some clinicians have started using anti-inflammatory treatments for OAPS, which have preliminarily improved the pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on these second-line treatments of OAPS. Another troubling issue is the clinical diagnosis of OAPS. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, there are only classification criteria for OAPS, and clinical diagnosis of OAPS depends on the clinicians\' experience. The present classification criteria of OAPS were established for clinical and basic research purposes, not for patient clinical management. In clinical practice, many patients with both positive aPLs and pathological pregnancy histories do not meet the strict OAPS criteria. This has led to widespread issues of incorrect diagnosis and treatment. Timely and accurate diagnosis of OAPS is crucial for effective treatment. In this article, we reviewed the epidemiological research progress on OAPS and summarized its classification principles, including: 1) the persistent presence of aPLs in circulation; 2) manifestations of OAPS, excluding other possible causes. For the first point, accurate assessment of aPLs is crucial; for the latter, previous studies regarded only placenta-related pregnancy complications as characteristic manifestations of OAPS. However, recent studies have indicated that adverse pregnancy outcomes related to trophoblast damage, such as recurrent miscarriage and stillbirth, also need to be considered in OAPS. We also discussed several key issues in the diagnosis and treatment of OAPS. First, we addressed the definition of non-standard OAPS and offered our opinion on defining non-standard OAPS within the framework of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) APS criteria. Then, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of different aPL testing methods, emphasizing that harmonizing results across platforms and establishing specific reference values are keys to resolving controversies in aPL testing results. We also introduced the application of non-criteria aPLs, especially anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibody (aPS/PT) and anti-β2 glycoprotein Ⅰ domain Ⅰ antibody (aβ2GPⅠDⅠ). Additionally, we discussed aPL-based OAPS risk classification strategies. Finally, we proposed potential treatment methods for refractory OAPS. The goal is to provide a reference for the clinical management of OAPS.

暂无摘要。

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are characterized by abnormalities in the heart, blood vessels, and blood flow. CVDs comprise a diverse set of health issues. There are several types of CVDs like stroke, endothelial dysfunction, thrombosis, atherosclerosis, plaque instability and heart failure. Identification of a new drug for heart disease takes longer duration and its safety efficacy test takes even longer duration of research and approval. This chapter explores drug repurposing, nano-therapy, and plant-based treatments for managing CVDs from existing drugs which saves time and safety issues with testing new drugs. Existing drugs like statins, ACE inhibitor, warfarin, beta blockers, aspirin and metformin have been found to be useful in treating cardiac disease. For better drug delivery, nano therapy is opening new avenues for cardiac research by targeting interleukin (IL), TNF and other proteins by proteome interactome analysis. Nanoparticles enable precise delivery to atherosclerotic plaques, inflammation areas, and damaged cardiac tissues. Advancements in nano therapeutic agents, such as drug-eluting stents and drug-loaded nanoparticles are transforming CVDs management. Plant-based treatments, containing phytochemicals from Botanical sources, have potential cardiovascular benefits. These phytochemicals can mitigate risk factors associated with CVDs. The integration of these strategies opens new avenues for personalized, effective, and minimally invasive cardiovascular care. Altogether, traditional drugs, phytochemicals along with nanoparticles can revolutionize the future cardiac health care by identifying their signaling pathway, mechanism and interactome analysis.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: The effects of aspirin in adults without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), stratified by statin use across different ASCVD risks, remain uncertain.
UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of aspirin in adults without ASCVD, stratified by statin use across different ASCVD risks.
UNASSIGNED: We searched databases through March 2022 and selected randomized controlled trials of aspirin without ASCVD and follow-up of ≥1 year. We used random-effects models and estimated relative and absolute risks for cardiovascular outcomes, major bleeding, and mortality over 5 years. We calculated absolute risk differences assuming constant relative risks (RRs) across statin use and ASCVD risks. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration, and the ASCEND (A Study of Cardiovascular Events in Diabetes) trial were used to estimate baseline risks.
UNASSIGNED: In 16 trials [171,215 individuals; median age, 64 (Q1-Q3: 60-65) years], aspirin vs control reduced myocardial infarction (MI) [RR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95)] but increased major bleeding [RR: 1.48 (95% CI: 1.32-1.66)]. Aspirin did not reduce mortality. Statin vs no statin was associated with lower bleeding and MI risk; the bleeding and MI risk were proportional to ASCVD risk. For every 10,000 adults, aspirin reduced MI (very low risk: 3 events as monotherapy or 1 event with statin; very high risk: 49 events as monotherapy or 37 events with statin) and increased major bleeding (very low risk: 21 events as monotherapy or 20 events with statin; very high risk: 98 events as monotherapy or 94 events with statin) proportional to baseline ASCVD risk.
UNASSIGNED: In adults without ASCVD, concomitant statin appeared to significantly reduce absolute risk reduction for MI associated with aspirin without influencing bleeding risk. The anticipated absolute risk of major bleeding with aspirin exceeds absolute MI benefits for every level of ASCVD risk.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive technique used to treat type B aortic dissections. Left subclavian artery (LSA) reconstruction is required when treating patients with involvement of LSA. The best antiplatelet therapy after LSA reconstruction is presently uncertain.
METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 245 type B aortic dissection patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularization during TEVAR. Out of 245 patients, 159 (64.9%) were in the single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) group, receiving only aspirin, and 86 (35.1%) were in the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group, receiving aspirin combined with clopidogrel. During the 6-month follow-up, primary endpoints included hemorrhagic events (general bleeding and hemorrhagic strokes), while secondary endpoints comprised ischemic events (left upper limb ischemia, ischemic stroke, and thrombotic events), as well as death and leakage events. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on hemorrhagic and ischemic events, with the Kaplan-Meier method used to generate the survival curve.
RESULTS: During the six-month follow-up, the incidence of hemorrhagic events in the DAPT group was higher (8.2% vs. 30.2%, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in ischemic events, death, or leakage events among the different antiplatelet treatment schemes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that DAPT (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07-4.60, P = 0.032) and previous chronic conditions (HR:3.88, 95% CI: 1.24-12.14, P = 0.020) significantly affected the occurrence of hemorrhagic events. Chronic conditions in this study encompassed depression, vitiligo, and cholecystolithiasis. Carotid subclavian bypass (CSB) group (HR:0.29, 95% CI: 0.12-0.68, P = 0.004) and single-branched stent graft (SBSG) group (HR:0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.50, P < 0.001) had a lower rate of ischemic events than fenestration TEVAR (F-TEVAR). Survival analysis over 6 months revealed a lower risk of bleeding associated with SAPT during hemorrhagic events (P = 0.043).
CONCLUSIONS: In type B aortic dissection patients undergoing LSA blood flow reconstruction after synchronous TEVAR, the bleeding risk significantly decreases with the SAPT regimen, and there is no apparent ischemic compensation within 6 months. Patients with previous chronic conditions have a higher risk of bleeding. The CSB group and SBSG group have less ischemic risk compared to F-TEVAR group.

The risk of developing cardiovascular disease is significantly higher for individuals with diabetes compared to those without. Aspirin has been widely used for primary prevention in diabetic patients. However, evidence is limited in the Asian population. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of aspirin versus placebo for primary cardiovascular prevention in the Asian population with type 2 diabetes. In this study, we performed propensity score matching with non-aspirin users from January 2006 to December 2015 (n = 37,095 in each group after matching, PSM). We analyzed the incidence risk of all-cause mortality, composite cardiovascular events, and hospitalized major bleeding. The propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort of patients who received aspirin within one year of diabetes diagnosis was compared with the non-aspirin diabetic (DM) cohort. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. The median follow-up duration was 78 months. Aspirin users exhibited a slightly but significantly lower rate of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87 to 0.96). However, they also had a significantly higher composite cardiovascular risk (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.28-1.40), including non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.50), non-fatal ischemic stroke (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.45), heart failure (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.27), and coronary revascularization (HR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.73 to 2.17). Aspirin users also faced a significantly higher risk of hospitalized major bleeding (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.14). The presence of one or more additional risk factors did not influence the effectiveness and safety outcomes of aspirin, according to stratified analysis. In conclusion, in this real-world Asian diabetic population, aspirin was associated with a significantly lower mortality risk but also with higher risks of cardiovascular events and hospitalized bleeding. Aspirin may not play a role in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in such patients, regardless of additional risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Atypical acinar cell foci (AACF) seen in pancreatic cancer are fatal and have been studied with some causative agents. However, for the first time, the effect of acetylsalicylic acid with nitric oxide (NO-ASA) on AACF was examined in this study. Although NO-ASA has very successful inhibitory effects against some types of cancer, it has not been investigated whether they can exert their inhibition effects on AACFs.
METHODS: For experimental purposes, 21 14-day-old male Wistar albino rats were used. Azaserine (30 mg/kg) was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl solution and injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) into 14 rats, except for the Control group (Cont) rats, for three weeks. Rats that were injected with azaserine once a week for three weeks and those that did not receive treatment were divided into experimental groups. 15 days after the end of the azaserine injection protocol, NO-ASA was applied to azaserine with NO-ASA (Az+NO-ASA) group rats three consecutive times with an interval of 15 days by gavage. At the end of the 5-month period, pancreatic tissue was dissected and weighed. Pancreas preparations prepared from histological sections were examined for AACF burden and analyzed via a video image analyzer. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) non-parametric statistical analyses were performed to test whether there was a difference between the averages of the experimental and Control groups.
RESULTS: AACF burden in both groups injected with azaserine was found to be statistically significant in all categories compared to that of the Control group (p < 0.05). The average Calculated Estimated average AACF volume (mm3) values, the Calculated estimated average AACF diameter (μm), the Estimated average number of AACF per unit volume, AACF rate as a % of Calculated Organ Volume were higher in the AzCont group rats than in the Az+NO-ASA group, when compared, and there was an important level statistical difference between the groups (p < 0.05). It was determined that for all parameters AACFs load in Az+NO-ASA group rats were significantly reduced compared to that of AzCont group rats (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We observed that, as a result of the NO-ASA application, the experimental AACF focus ratio created by azaserine injection was significantly inhibited. The inhibitory effect of AACFs in Az+NO-ASA group rats may have resulted from the significant and independent chemopreventive and/or chemotherapeutic activity of NO-ASA against exocrine pancreatic AACF foci.

UNASSIGNED: Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is a significant medical concern characterized by the formation of blood clots within the venous system. Surgical procedures are known to increase the risk of DVT. While enoxaparin has proven to be highly effective in treating DVT, concerns about bleeding and accurate dosage regulation may restrict its application. Recent research has focused on aspirin\'s potential in preventing DVT after various surgeries. This study aimed to determine whether aspirin was as effective as enoxaparin in preventing DVT after spine surgery.
UNASSIGNED: This randomized controlled trial enrolled study patients who underwent spine surgery at Shahid Kamyab Emergency Hospital in Mashhad, and had a Caprini score > 5, indicating a higher risk of DVT. In the control group, patients received subcutaneous injections of enoxaparin at a dosage of 40 mg, while the intervention group received oral aspirin tablets with a daily dosage of 81 mg. An experienced radiologist performed a Doppler ultrasound of the lower limbs\' veins seven days after surgery to diagnose DVT. The outcomes of the two groups were then compared.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 100 patients participated in the clinical trial and were equally assigned to the aspirin and enoxaparin groups. Both groups were homogeneous regarding the basic and clinical characteristics. The incidence of postoperative DVT was 4.0% in the aspirin group and 10.0% in the enoxaparin group (p=0.092). The incidence of hemorrhage was 2.0% in the aspirin group and 4.0% in the enoxaparin group (p=0.610).
UNASSIGNED: These findings indicate that aspirin may be a promising alternative to enoxaparin for DVT prevention after surgery, but additional research is essential to validate these results and further assess the benefits and risks associated with aspirin usage in this context.

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between a Parkinson\'s disease (PD)-specific polygenic score (PGS) and protective lifestyle factors on age at onset (AAO) in PD. We included data from 4367 patients with idiopathic PD, 159 patients with GBA1-PD, and 3090 healthy controls of European ancestry from AMP-PD, PPMI, and Fox Insight cohorts. The association between PGS and lifestyle factors on AAO was assessed with linear and Cox proportional hazards models. The PGS showed a negative association with AAO (β = - 1.07, p = 6 × 10-7) in patients with idiopathic PD. The use of one, two, or three of the protective lifestyle factors showed a reduction in the hazard ratio by 21% (p = 0.0001), 44% (p < 2 × 10-16), and 55% (p < 2 × 10-16), compared to no use. An additive effect of aspirin (β = 7.62, p = 9 × 10-7) and PGS (β = - 1.58, p = 0.0149) was found for AAO without an interaction (p = 0.9993) in the linear regressions, and similar effects were seen for tobacco. In contrast, no association between aspirin intake and AAO was found in GBA1-PD (p > 0.05). In our cohort, coffee, tobacco, aspirin, and PGS are independent predictors of PD AAO. Additionally, lifestyle factors seem to have a greater influence on AAO than common genetic risk variants with aspirin presenting the largest effect.