Aspirin

阿司匹林
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    产科抗磷脂综合征(OAPS)是一种与各种病理性妊娠相关的自身免疫性疾病,例如复发性流产,死产,重度子痫前期和重度胎盘功能不全。抗磷脂抗体(aPL)的持续存在是OAPS最重要的实验室特征。OAPS严重影响中国育龄妇女的生殖健康。报告显示,大约9.6%的死胎,11.5%重度子痫前期,54%的复发性流产与OAPS或aPL有关。然而,OAPS的发病机制尚不清楚。以前,母胎界面血栓形成(MFI)被认为是OAPS相关病理性妊娠的主要机制.因此,建议在整个妊娠期间使用低分子量肝素和阿司匹林,以改善OAPS患者的结局.近年来,许多研究发现MFI中的血栓形成并不常见,但各种炎症因子在OAPS患者的MFI中显著升高。基于这些发现,一些临床医生已经开始使用抗炎治疗OAPS,初步改善了妊娠结局。然而,对于OAPS的这些二线治疗方法尚无共识。另一个令人不安的问题是OAPS的临床诊断。类似于其他自身免疫性疾病,只有OAPS的分类标准,OAPS的临床诊断取决于临床医生的经验。目前的OAPS分类标准是为临床和基础研究目的而建立的,不适用于患者临床管理。在临床实践中,许多aPL阳性且有病理妊娠史的患者不符合严格的OAPS标准.这导致了不正确的诊断和治疗的广泛问题。及时准确诊断OAPS是有效治疗的关键。在这篇文章中,综述了OAPS的流行病学研究进展,总结了OAPS的分类原则,包括:1)循环中持续存在的aPL;2)OAPS的表现,排除其他可能的原因。对于第一点,对aPLs的准确评估是至关重要的;对于后者来说,以往的研究仅将胎盘相关妊娠并发症视为OAPS的特征性表现.然而,最近的研究表明,不良妊娠结局与滋养细胞损伤有关,例如复发性流产和死胎,在OAPS中也需要考虑。我们还讨论了OAPS诊断和治疗中的几个关键问题。首先,我们讨论了非标准OAPS的定义,并提出了在2023年美国风湿病学会(ACR)/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)APS标准框架内定义非标准OAPS的意见.然后,我们讨论了不同的aPL测试方法的优缺点,强调跨平台协调结果和建立特定的参考值是解决aPL测试结果争议的关键。我们还介绍了非标准不良贷款的应用,特别是抗磷脂酰丝氨酸/凝血酶原抗体(aPS/PT)和抗β2糖蛋白Ⅰ结构域Ⅰ抗体(aβ2GPⅠDⅠ)。此外,我们讨论了基于aPL的OAPS风险分类策略。最后,我们提出了难治性OAPS的潜在治疗方法。旨在为OAPS的临床管理提供参考。
    Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is an autoimmune disorder associated with various pathological pregnancies, such as recurrent miscarriage, stillbirth, severe pre-eclampsia and severe placental insufficiency. The persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) is the most important laboratory characteristic of OAPS. OAPS severely affects the reproductive health of women of childbearing age in China. Reports indicate that approximately 9.6% stillbirths, 11.5% severe pre-eclampsia, and 54% recurrent miscarriages are associated with OAPS or aPLs. However, the pathogenesis of OAPS remains unclear. Previously, thrombosis at the maternal-fetal interface (MFI) was considered the main mechanism of OAPS-related pathological pregnancies. Consequently, the use of low molecular weight heparin and aspirin throughout pregnancy was recommended to improve outcomes in OAPS patient. In recent years, many studies have found that thrombosis in MFI is uncommon, but various inflammatory factors are significantly increased in the MFI of OAPS patients. Based on these findings, some clinicians have started using anti-inflammatory treatments for OAPS, which have preliminarily improved the pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on these second-line treatments of OAPS. Another troubling issue is the clinical diagnosis of OAPS. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, there are only classification criteria for OAPS, and clinical diagnosis of OAPS depends on the clinicians\' experience. The present classification criteria of OAPS were established for clinical and basic research purposes, not for patient clinical management. In clinical practice, many patients with both positive aPLs and pathological pregnancy histories do not meet the strict OAPS criteria. This has led to widespread issues of incorrect diagnosis and treatment. Timely and accurate diagnosis of OAPS is crucial for effective treatment. In this article, we reviewed the epidemiological research progress on OAPS and summarized its classification principles, including: 1) the persistent presence of aPLs in circulation; 2) manifestations of OAPS, excluding other possible causes. For the first point, accurate assessment of aPLs is crucial; for the latter, previous studies regarded only placenta-related pregnancy complications as characteristic manifestations of OAPS. However, recent studies have indicated that adverse pregnancy outcomes related to trophoblast damage, such as recurrent miscarriage and stillbirth, also need to be considered in OAPS. We also discussed several key issues in the diagnosis and treatment of OAPS. First, we addressed the definition of non-standard OAPS and offered our opinion on defining non-standard OAPS within the framework of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) APS criteria. Then, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of different aPL testing methods, emphasizing that harmonizing results across platforms and establishing specific reference values are keys to resolving controversies in aPL testing results. We also introduced the application of non-criteria aPLs, especially anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibody (aPS/PT) and anti-β2 glycoprotein Ⅰ domain Ⅰ antibody (aβ2GPⅠDⅠ). Additionally, we discussed aPL-based OAPS risk classification strategies. Finally, we proposed potential treatment methods for refractory OAPS. The goal is to provide a reference for the clinical management of OAPS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)是一种用于治疗B型主动脉夹层的微创技术。在治疗累及LSA的患者时,需要重建左锁骨下动脉(LSA)。LSA重建后的最佳抗血小板治疗目前尚不确定。
    方法:本研究回顾性分析了245例在TEVAR期间接受左锁骨下动脉血运重建的B型主动脉夹层患者。245名患者中,单抗血小板治疗(SAPT)组159例(64.9%),只接受阿司匹林,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)组86例(35.1%),接受阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗。在6个月的随访中,主要终点包括出血事件(一般出血和出血性中风),而次要终点包括缺血事件(左上肢缺血,缺血性卒中,和血栓形成事件),以及死亡和泄漏事件。对出血和缺血事件进行单变量和多变量Cox回归分析。使用Kaplan-Meier方法生成生存曲线。
    结果:在六个月的随访中,DAPT组的出血性事件发生率较高(8.2%vs.30.2%,P<0.001)。在缺血事件中没有观察到显著差异,死亡,或不同抗血小板治疗方案中的渗漏事件。多因素Cox回归分析显示,DAPT(HR:2.22,95%CI:1.07-4.60,P=0.032)和既往慢性病(HR:3.88,95%CI:1.24-12.14,P=0.020)显著影响出血性事件的发生。这项研究中的慢性病包括抑郁症,白癜风,和胆囊结石症.颈动脉锁骨下旁路术(CSB)组(HR:0.29,95%CI:0.12-0.68,P=0.004)和单分支支架(SBSG)组(HR:0.26,95%CI:0.13-0.50,P<0.001)的缺血事件发生率低于开窗TEVAR(F-TEVAR)。超过6个月的生存分析显示出血性事件期间与SAPT相关的出血风险较低(P=0.043)。
    结论:在接受同步TEVAR术后LSA血流重建的B型主动脉夹层患者中,SAPT方案的出血风险显着降低,6个月内无明显缺血代偿。既往有慢性疾病的患者出血风险较高。与F-TEVAR组相比,CSB组和SBSG组的缺血风险较低。
    BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive technique used to treat type B aortic dissections. Left subclavian artery (LSA) reconstruction is required when treating patients with involvement of LSA. The best antiplatelet therapy after LSA reconstruction is presently uncertain.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 245 type B aortic dissection patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularization during TEVAR. Out of 245 patients, 159 (64.9%) were in the single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) group, receiving only aspirin, and 86 (35.1%) were in the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group, receiving aspirin combined with clopidogrel. During the 6-month follow-up, primary endpoints included hemorrhagic events (general bleeding and hemorrhagic strokes), while secondary endpoints comprised ischemic events (left upper limb ischemia, ischemic stroke, and thrombotic events), as well as death and leakage events. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on hemorrhagic and ischemic events, with the Kaplan-Meier method used to generate the survival curve.
    RESULTS: During the six-month follow-up, the incidence of hemorrhagic events in the DAPT group was higher (8.2% vs. 30.2%, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in ischemic events, death, or leakage events among the different antiplatelet treatment schemes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that DAPT (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07-4.60, P = 0.032) and previous chronic conditions (HR:3.88, 95% CI: 1.24-12.14, P = 0.020) significantly affected the occurrence of hemorrhagic events. Chronic conditions in this study encompassed depression, vitiligo, and cholecystolithiasis. Carotid subclavian bypass (CSB) group (HR:0.29, 95% CI: 0.12-0.68, P = 0.004) and single-branched stent graft (SBSG) group (HR:0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.50, P < 0.001) had a lower rate of ischemic events than fenestration TEVAR (F-TEVAR). Survival analysis over 6 months revealed a lower risk of bleeding associated with SAPT during hemorrhagic events (P = 0.043).
    CONCLUSIONS: In type B aortic dissection patients undergoing LSA blood flow reconstruction after synchronous TEVAR, the bleeding risk significantly decreases with the SAPT regimen, and there is no apparent ischemic compensation within 6 months. Patients with previous chronic conditions have a higher risk of bleeding. The CSB group and SBSG group have less ischemic risk compared to F-TEVAR group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胃粘膜损伤是一种慢性进行性胃病,可由非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)引起。因此,迫切需要找到安全有效的药物来预防NSAIDs引起的胃粘膜损伤。肉桂醛(CA)是从肉桂根茎中提取的生物活性化合物,具有多种药理作用,包括消炎药,镇痛药,抗凋亡,和抗氧化活性。然而,CA对胃粘膜损伤的潜在药理作用尚不清楚.
    目的:本研究的目的是研究CA对阿司匹林致胃粘膜损伤的保护作用及其作用机制。阿司匹林致小鼠胃粘膜损伤的体外模型,阿司匹林和Erastin对GES-1细胞损伤的体外模型。使用转录组学和生物信息学确定CA的作用机制。
    结果:CA通过调节下游靶点发挥其对胃粘膜损伤的保护作用,包括mTOR,GSK3β,和NRF2,通过PI3K/AKT信号通路抑制自噬,凋亡,和胃上皮细胞中的铁性凋亡。进一步的细胞实验证实PI3K/AKT途径是CA抗胃粘膜损伤的关键靶标。
    结论:这项研究提供了CA的第一个证据,肉桂中的一种活性化合物,具有预防和治疗胃粘膜损伤的治疗潜力,其机制涉及细胞凋亡的调节,自噬,PI3K/AKT信号通路介导的胃上皮细胞铁凋亡。
    BACKGROUND: Gastric mucosal injury is a chronic and progressive stomach disease that can be caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Therefore, there is an urgent need to find safe and effective drugs to prevent gastric mucosal injury due to NSAIDs. Cinnamaldehyde (CA) is a bioactive compound extracted from the rhizome of cinnamon and has various pharmacological functions, including anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antiapoptotic, and antioxidant activities. However, the potential pharmacological effect of CA on gastric mucosal injury remains unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of CA on aspirin-induced gastric mucosal injury and to explore its mechanism of action METHODS: The effect of CA on gastric mucosal injury was investigated in vitro and in vivo, in vitro mouse model of gastric mucosal injury induced by aspirin, in vitro model of GES-1 cell injury by aspirin and Erastin. The mechanism of action of CA was determined using Transcriptomics and bioinformatics.
    RESULTS: CA exerted its protective effects against gastric mucosal injury by modulating the downstream targets, including mTOR, GSK3β, and NRF2, via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway to inhibit autophagy, apoptosis, and ferroptosis in the gastric epithelial cells. Further cellular experiments confirmed that the PI3K/AKT pathway was a key target for CA against gastric mucosal injury.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of CA, an active compound in cinnamon, possessing therapeutic potential in preventing and treating gastric mucosal injury, with its mechanism involving the regulation of apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis in gastric epithelial cells mediated by the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在以往的研究中,我们已经证明,应激反应引起的高糖皮质激素水平可能是创伤性异位骨化(HO)的根本原因,我们已经建立了糖皮质激素诱导的异位矿化(EM)小鼠模型,通过向心肌毒素注射引起的肌肉损伤的动物全身给药高剂量的地塞米松(DEX)。在这个模型中,营养不良性钙化(DC)以细胞自主方式发展为HO。然而,目前尚不清楚DEX治疗后DC是如何形成的。因此,在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨糖皮质激素如何在细胞和分子水平引发肌肉EM.我们发现DEX治疗抑制炎症细胞浸润到受损肌肉,但肌肉中的炎症细胞因子产生显著增加,提示其他非炎性肌细胞类型可能调节炎症反应和肌肉修复过程。伴随着这种表型,转化生长因子β1(TGF-β1)在纤维脂肪祖细胞(FAP)中的表达大大下调。由于TGF-β1是一种强大的免疫抑制剂,FAP的调节作用对肌肉修复有很大的影响,我们假设DEX治疗后FAP中TGF-β1的下调导致了这种过度炎症状态,随后导致肌肉修复和EM形成失败.为了检验我们的假设,我们利用转基因小鼠模型特异性敲除PDGFRα阳性FAP中的Tgfb1基因,以研究转基因小鼠是否可以重现DEX治疗诱导的表型.我们的结果表明,转基因小鼠完全表现出这种高炎性状态,并在肌肉损伤后自发发展为EM。相反,增强FAP中TGF-β1信号传导的治疗剂抑制了炎症反应并减弱了肌肉EM。总之,这些结果表明,FAPs衍生的TGF-β1是调节肌肉炎症反应和随后的EM的关键分子,糖皮质激素通过下调FAP中的TGF-β1发挥其作用。
    异位骨化(HO)是软组织中异常的骨形成。糖皮质激素,具有很强的抗炎特性,通常被用作HO疗法。然而,我们的发现提示糖皮质激素也能促进HO的形成.在这项研究中,我们试图解释这些看似矛盾的观察的根本原因。我们发现糖皮质激素,除了对炎症细胞发挥抗炎作用外,还可以靶向另一种类型的肌肉细胞以发挥促炎作用。这些细胞被称为纤维脂肪原祖细胞(FAP),我们证明FAP通过调节转化生长因子β1(TGF-β1)的表达在肌肉炎症反应中起主要调节作用,众所周知的免疫抑制剂.总之,我们的发现强调了FAPTGF-β1水平在影响肌肉HO进展和消退中的重要性,并根据其提高FAP中TGF-β1水平的能力为HO提供了新的治疗选择。
    In previous studies, we have demonstrated that stress response-induced high glucocorticoid levels could be the underlying cause of traumatic heterotopic ossification (HO), and we have developed a glucocorticoid-induced ectopic mineralization (EM) mouse model by systemic administration of a high dose of dexamethasone (DEX) to animals with muscle injury induced by cardiotoxin injection. In this model, dystrophic calcification (DC) developed into HO in a cell autonomous manner. However, it is not clear how DC is formed after DEX treatment. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to explore how glucocorticoids initiate muscle EM at a cellular and molecular level. We showed that DEX treatment inhibited inflammatory cell infiltration into injured muscle but inflammatory cytokine production in the muscle was significantly increased, suggesting that other non-inflammatory muscle cell types may regulate the inflammatory response and the muscle repair process. Accompanying this phenotype, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) expression in fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs) was greatly down-regulated. Since TGF-β1 is a strong immune suppressor and FAP\'s regulatory role has a large impact on muscle repair, we hypothesized that down-regulation of TGF-β1 in FAPs after DEX treatment resulted in this hyperinflammatory state and subsequent failed muscle repair and EM formation. To test our hypothesis, we utilized a transgenic mouse model to specifically knock out Tgfb1 gene in PDGFRα positive FAPs to investigate if the transgenic mice could recapitulate the phenotype that was induced by DEX treatment. Our results showed that the transgenic mice completely phenocopied this hyperinflammatory state and spontaneously developed EM following muscle injury. On the contrary, therapeutics that enhanced TGF-β1 signaling in FAPs inhibited the inflammatory response and attenuated muscle EM. In summary, these results indicate that FAPs-derived TGF-β1 is a key molecule in regulating muscle inflammatory response and subsequent EM, and that glucocorticoids exert their effect via down-regulating TGF-β1 in FAPs.
    Heterotopic ossification (HO) is abnormal bone formation in soft tissue. Glucocorticoids, which have strong anti-inflammatory properties, have usually been used as HO therapeutics. However, our findings suggest that glucocorticoids can also promote HO formation. In this study, we tried to explain the underlying reason for these seemingly contradictory observations. We showed that glucocorticoids, in addition to exerting an anti-inflammatory effect on inflammatory cells, can also target another type of muscle cell to exert a pro-inflammatory effect. These cells are called fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs), and we demonstrated that FAPs played a master regulatory role in the muscle inflammatory response by modulating the expression of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), a well-known immune suppressor. In summary, our findings highlighted the importance of FAP TGF-β1 levels in affecting the progression and regression of muscle HO, and provided new treatment options for HO based on their ability to elevate TGF-β1 levels in FAPs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项队列研究旨在评估细胞色素P450家族2亚家族C成员19(CYP2C19)基因分型之间的联系,口服氯吡格雷后的血小板聚集性,以及非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后房颤(POAF)的发生。从2017年5月到2022年11月,共有258名患者接受选择性首次CABG手术。接受100毫克/天口服阿司匹林和75毫克/天口服氯吡格雷术后,被纳入分析。根据CYP2C19基因分型对这些患者进行分类。在CABG之前使用多电极聚集度连续评估血小板聚集性,手术后1天和5天,在出院前。使用累积风险的对数秩检验比较POAF的发生率。CYP2C19基因分型导致分类为CYP2C19*1*1(WT组,n=123)和CYP2C19*2或*3(LOF组,n=135)。基线特征和手术数据显示两组之间没有显着差异。LOF组CABG术后POAF发生率为42.2%,与WT组的22.8%相比(风险风险[HR]:2.061;95%置信区间[CI]:1.347,3.153;p=0.0013)。CABG后5天,LOF组的二磷酸腺苷刺激的血小板聚集明显高于WT组(30.4%±6.5%vs.17.9%±4.1%,p<0.001),出院时保持类似的较高水平(25.6%±6.1%与12.2%±3.5%,p<0.001)。CYP2C19LOF的存在与相同口服氯吡格雷方案下CABG手术后POAF的发生率较高和血小板聚集相对升高有关。
    This cohort study aims to assess the connection between cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 19 (CYP2C19) genotyping, platelet aggregability following oral clopidogrel administration, and the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. From May 2017 to November 2022, a total of 258 patients undergoing elective first-time CABG surgery, receiving 100 mg/day oral aspirin and 75 mg/day oral clopidogrel postoperatively, was included for analysis. These patients were categorized based on CYP2C19 genotyping. Platelet aggregability was assessed serially using multiple-electrode aggregometry before CABG, 1 and 5 days after the procedure, and before discharge. The incidences of POAF were compared using the log-rank test for cumulative risk. CYP2C19 genotyping led to categorization into CYP2C19*1*1 (WT group, n = 123) and CYP2C19*2 or *3 (LOF group, n = 135). Baseline characteristics and operative data showed no significant differences between the two groups. The incidence of POAF after CABG was 42.2% in the LOF group, contrasting with 22.8% in the WT group (hazard risk [HR]: 2.061; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.347, 3.153; p = 0.0013). Adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet aggregation was notably higher in the LOF group compared to the WT group 5 days after CABG (30.4% ± 6.5% vs. 17.9% ± 4.1%, p < 0.001), remaining a similar higher level at hospital discharge (25.6% ± 6.1% vs. 12.2% ± 3.5%, p < 0.001). The presence of CYP2C19 LOF was linked to a higher incidence of POAF and relatively elevated platelet aggregation after CABG surgery under the same oral clopidogrel regimen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阿司匹林是一种广泛用于预防血栓的抗血小板药物,降低心血管事件的风险。医疗保健提供者需要注意阿司匹林引起的出血风险,并仔细平衡其益处与潜在风险。这项研究的目的是创建一个实用的列线图,用于预测使用阿司匹林治疗有心肌梗塞史的患者的出血风险。
    方法:纳入2099例使用阿司匹林的心肌梗死患者。将患者随机分为两组,以7:3的比例,用于模型开发和内部验证。Boruta分析用于鉴定与出血相关的临床显著特征。建立基于独立出血危险因素的Logistic回归模型,并作为列线图呈现。模型性能从三个方面进行评估:识别fi阳离子,校准,和临床效用。
    结果:Boruta分析确定了25个临床特征,进一步的多变量logistic回归分析选择了四个独立的危险因素:血红蛋白,血小板计数,先前出血,和性爱。基于这些变量创建了视觉列线图。该模型在训练数据集中的曲线下面积为0.888(95%CI:0.845-0.931),在测试数据集中为0.888(95%CI:0.808-0.968)。校准曲线分析显示接近理想曲线。决策曲线分析表明,该模型具有良好的临床净效益。
    结论:我们的研究重点是建立和验证一个模型,以评估使用阿司匹林治疗有心肌梗死史的患者的出血风险。在歧视方面表现突出,校准,和净临床效益。
    BACKGROUND: Aspirin is a widely used antiplatelet medication to prevent blood clots, reducing the risk of cardiovascular event. Healthcare providers need to be mindful of the risk of aspirin-induced bleeding and carefully balancing its benefits against potential risks. The objective of this study was to create a practical nomogram for predicting bleeding risk in patients with a history of myocardial infarction treating with aspirin.
    METHODS: A total of 2099 myocardial infarction patients with aspirin were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, with a 7:3 ratio, for model development and internal validation. Boruta analysis was utilized to identify clinically significant features associated with bleeding. Logistic regression model based on independent bleeding risk factors was constructed and presented as a nomogram. Model performance was assessed from three aspects: identification, calibration, and clinical utility.
    RESULTS: Boruta analysis identified eight clinical features from 25, and further multivariate logistic regression analysis selected four independent risk factors: hemoglobin, platelet count, previous bleeding, and sex. A visual nomogram was created based on these variables. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.888 (95% CI: 0.845-0.931) in the training dataset and 0.888 (95% CI: 0.808-0.968) in the test dataset. Calibration curve analysis showed close approximation to the ideal curve. Decision curve analysis demonstrated favorable clinical net benefit for the model.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study focused on creating and validating a model to evaluate bleeding risk in patients with a history of myocardial infarction treated with aspirin, which demonstrated outstanding performance in discrimination, calibration, and net clinical benefit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然阿司匹林可以降低结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率,其作为CRC治疗的意义仍不确定,阿司匹林在CRC中的作用机制尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们使用阿司匹林预防小鼠AOM/DSS诱导的CRC,使用苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色并通过测定小鼠存活率和肿瘤大小来评估阿司匹林的抗CRC功效。16SrDNA测序,流式细胞术(FCM),我们还进行了蛋白质印迹来研究肠道微生物群的变化,肿瘤免疫微环境,和凋亡蛋白,分别。结果表明,阿司匹林对小鼠具有明显的抗CRC作用。根据16SrDNA测序,阿司匹林调节肠道微生物群的组成,并显著降低盲肠球菌的丰度。FCM表明有更多的CD155肿瘤细胞和CD4+CD25+Treg细胞显示增加的TIGIT水平。此外,Treg细胞上TIGIT表达增加与Treg细胞功能降低相关。重要的是,Treg细胞的抑制伴随着CD19+GL-7+B细胞的促进,CD8+T细胞,CD4+CCR4+Th2细胞,和CD4+CCR6+Th17细胞。总的来说,阿司匹林通过调节盲肠球菌和TIGIT+Treg细胞的丰度来预防结直肠癌。
    Although aspirin can reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), there is still uncertainty about its significance as a treatment for CRC, and the mechanism of aspirin in CRC is not well understood. In this study, we used aspirin to prevent AOM/DSS-induced CRC in mice, and the anti-CRC efficacy of aspirin was assessed using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and by determining the mouse survival rate and tumour size. 16S rDNA sequencing, flow cytometry (FCM), and Western blotting were also conducted to investigate the changes in the gut microbiota, tumour immune microenvironment, and apoptotic proteins, respectively. The results demonstrated that aspirin significantly exerted anti-CRC effects in mice. According to 16S rDNA sequencing, aspirin regulated the composition of the gut microbiota and dramatically reduced the abundance of Enterococcus cecorum. FCM demonstrated that there were more CD155 tumour cells and CD4 + CD25 + Treg cells showed increased TIGIT levels. Moreover, increased TIGIT expression on Treg cells is associated with reduced Treg cell functionality. Importantly, the inhibition of Treg cells is accompanied by the promotion of CD19 + GL-7 + B cells, CD8 + T cells, CD4 + CCR4 + Th2 cells, and CD4 + CCR6 + Th17 cells. Overall, aspirin prevents colorectal cancer by regulating the abundance of Enterococcus cecorum and TIGIT + Treg cells.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脓毒症是一种威胁生命的疾病,伴有凝血和免疫系统的紊乱。P2Y12抑制剂,广泛用于动脉血栓形成的预防和治疗,拥有最近发现的抗炎特性,提高改善脓毒症预后的潜力。
    方法:我们使用来自重症监护医学信息集市数据库的数据进行了回顾性分析。根据是否使用P2Y12抑制剂,将患者分为阿司匹林单独组和联合组。30天死亡率的差异,重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间(LOS),LOS在医院,比较两组患者的出血事件和血栓事件.
    结果:通过倾向评分匹配获得了总共1701对匹配患者。我们发现,阿司匹林单药组和联合用药组30天死亡率无统计学差异(15.3%vs.13.7%,对数秩p=0.154)。此外,接受P2Y12抑制剂的患者消化道出血发生率较高(0.5%vs.1.6%,p=0.004)和缺血性卒中(1.7%vs.2.9%,p=0.023),尽管医院的LOS较短(11.1vs.10.3天,p=0.043)。Cox回归分析显示P2Y12抑制剂与30天死亡率无关(HR=1.14,95%CI0.95-1.36,p=0.154)。
    结论:P2Y12抑制剂不能为脓毒症患者提供生存获益,甚至导致额外的不良临床结局。
    BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening disease accompanied by disorders of the coagulation and immune systems. P2Y12 inhibitors, widely used for arterial thrombosis prevention and treatment, possess recently discovered anti-inflammatory properties, raising potential for improved sepsis prognosis.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the data from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. Patients were divided into an aspirin-alone group versus a combination group based on the use of a P2Y12 inhibitor or not. Differences in 30-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in hospital, bleeding events and thrombotic events were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 1701 pairs of matched patients were obtained by propensity score matching. We found that no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality in aspirin-alone group and combination group (15.3% vs. 13.7%, log-rank p = 0.154). In addition, patients received P2Y12 inhibitors had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (0.5% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.004) and ischemic stroke (1.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.023), despite having a shorter LOS in hospital (11.1 vs. 10.3, days, p = 0.043). Cox regression showed that P2Y12 inhibitor was not associated with 30-day mortality (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.95-1.36, p = 0.154).
    CONCLUSIONS: P2Y12 inhibitors did not provide a survival benefit for patients with sepsis 3 and even led to additional adverse clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估不同抗血小板策略对冠状动脉旁路移植术后临床结局的影响。
    冠状动脉旁路移植术后随机不同抗血小板治疗策略的五年随访(DACAB)试验.
    中国六家三级医院;2014年7月至2015年11月入组;2019年8月至2021年6月完成5年随访。
    500名年龄在18-80岁的患者(包括91名(18.2%)女性)接受了择期冠状动脉旁路移植术并完成了DACAB试验。
    患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配给替格瑞洛90mg,每天两次,加上阿司匹林100mg,每天一次(双联抗血小板治疗;n=168),替格瑞洛单药90mg,每日两次(n=166),或阿司匹林单药100mg,每日一次(n=166),手术后一年。第一年之后,抗血小板治疗是根据治疗医师的标准进行的.
    主要结局是主要不良心血管事件(全因死亡的复合,心肌梗塞,中风,和冠状动脉血运重建),使用意向治疗原则进行分析。使用时间至事件分析来比较治疗组之间的风险。多项事后敏感性分析检查了调查结果的稳健性。
    对500例患者中的477例(95.4%)完成了5年主要不良心血管事件的随访;148例患者有主要不良心血管事件,包括双重抗血小板治疗组的39人,替格瑞洛单药治疗组54,阿司匹林单药治疗组55例。与阿司匹林单药治疗(22.6%v29.9%;风险比0.65,95%置信区间0.43~0.99;P=0.04)和替格瑞洛单药治疗(22.6%v32.9%;0.66,0.44~1.00;P=0.05)相比,5年主要不良心血管事件的风险显著降低。所有敏感性分析结果一致。
    与阿司匹林单药或替格瑞洛单药相比,术后1年替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗可降低冠状动脉旁路移植术后5年主要不良心血管事件的风险。
    NCT03987373ClinicalTrials.govNCT03987373。
    To assess the effect of different antiplatelet strategies on clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Five year follow-up of randomised Different Antiplatelet Therapy Strategy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (DACAB) trial.
    Six tertiary hospitals in China; enrolment between July 2014 and November 2015; completion of five year follow-up from August 2019 to June 2021.
    500 patients aged 18-80 years (including 91 (18.2%) women) who had elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and completed the DACAB trial.
    Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily (dual antiplatelet therapy; n=168), ticagrelor monotherapy 90 mg twice daily (n=166), or aspirin monotherapy 100 mg once daily (n=166) for one year after surgery. After the first year, antiplatelet therapy was prescribed according to standard of care by treating physicians.
    The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularisation), analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. Time-to-event analysis was used to compare the risk between treatment groups. Multiple post hoc sensitivity analyses examined the robustness of the findings.
    Follow-up at five years for major adverse cardiovascular events was completed for 477 (95.4%) of 500 patients; 148 patients had major adverse cardiovascular events, including 39 in the dual antiplatelet therapy group, 54 in the ticagrelor monotherapy group, and 55 in the aspirin monotherapy group. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at five years was significantly lower with dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin monotherapy (22.6% v 29.9%; hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.99; P=0.04) and versus ticagrelor monotherapy (22.6% v 32.9%; 0.66, 0.44 to 1.00; P=0.05). Results were consistent in all sensitivity analyses.
    Treatment with ticagrelor dual antiplatelet therapy for one year after surgery reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at five years after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with aspirin monotherapy or ticagrelor monotherapy.
    NCT03987373ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03987373.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    栓塞的动脉粥样硬化来源是不明来源的栓塞性中风(ESUS)的重要原因。然而,强化双联抗血小板治疗对ESUS疗效的证据有限.我们进行了一项研究,以确定基因导向的双重抗血小板治疗是否可以降低ESUS患者复发性卒中的风险。
    CHANCE-2(氯吡格雷在急性非致残性脑血管事件-II高危患者中的应用)是研究者发起的,多中心,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照试验,客观比较了中国携带CYP2C19功能丧失等位基因的轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的替格瑞洛加阿司匹林和氯吡格雷加阿司匹林。所有研究参与者被分为ESUS和非ESUS组,用于预设的探索性分析。Cox比例风险模型用于评估ESUS状态与替格瑞洛-阿司匹林和氯吡格雷-阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗效果的相互作用。调整社会人口统计学和临床因素。
    亚组分析包括CHANCE-2试验中的5796名参与者(占6412名参与者的90.4%),平均年龄为64.9岁(范围,57.0-71.4年),其中1964年(33.9%)为女性。作为研究方案的一部分,这些参与者接受了弥散加权成像。经过系统评价,15.2%的患者(881/5796)被认为患有ESUS。ESUS患者卒中复发的发生率在替格瑞洛-阿司匹林组为5.6%,氯吡格雷-阿司匹林组为9.2%(风险比,0.57[95%CI,0.33-0.99];P=0.04)。在没有ESUS的患者中,各自的发病率分别为5.6%和7.5%(危险比,0.72[95%CI,0.58-0.90];P<0.01)。治疗×ESUS状态交互效应的P值为0.56。
    在这个预设的探索性分析中,在携带CYP2C19功能丧失等位基因并被分类为ESUS的急性缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者中,替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林在90天预防卒中方面优于氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林。
    URL:http://www。临床试验.gov.唯一标识符:NCT04078737。
    UNASSIGNED: The atherosclerotic sources of embolism are a significant contributor to embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). However, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of intensive dual antiplatelet therapy for ESUS. We conducted an investigation to determine whether gene-directed dual antiplatelet therapy could reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS.
    UNASSIGNED: CHANCE-2 (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that objectively compared ticagrelor plus aspirin and clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles in China. All study participants were classified into ESUS and non-ESUS groups for the prespecified exploratory analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of the state of ESUS with the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors.
    UNASSIGNED: The subgroup analysis comprised 5796 participants (90.4% of the total 6412 participants) in the CHANCE-2 trial, with a median age of 64.9 years (range, 57.0-71.4 years), of whom 1964 (33.9%) were female. These participants underwent diffusion-weighted imaging as part of the study protocol. After systematic evaluation, 15.2% of patients (881/5796) were deemed to have ESUS. The incidence of stroke recurrence in patients with ESUS was found to be 5.6% in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 9.2% in the clopidogrel-aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.99]; P=0.04). In patients without ESUS, the respective incidence rates were 5.6% and 7.5% (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.58-0.90]; P<0.01). The P value was 0.56 for the treatment × ESUS status interaction effect.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prespecified exploratory analysis, ticagrelor with aspirin was superior to clopidogrel with aspirin for preventing stroke at 90 days in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles and were classified as ESUS.
    UNASSIGNED: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号