APRIL

4 月
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    产生抗体的浆细胞促进体液免疫反应。它们还有助于自身免疫性疾病,例如系统性红斑狼疮或IgA肾病。白细胞介素-6和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)家族配体BAFF(B细胞活化因子)和APRIL(增殖诱导配体)参与浆细胞存活。BAFF与三种受体结合,BAFFR(BAFF受体),TACI(跨膜激活剂和CAML相互作用剂),和BCMA(B细胞成熟抗原),而APRIL与TACI,BCMA,和蛋白聚糖。然而,在不同的身体位置维持浆细胞所需的配体-受体对仍然未知。这里,通过结合小鼠遗传和药理学方法,我们发现浆细胞需要BCMA和/或TACI,但不需要BAFFR.BCMA专门回应了4月,而TACI对BAFF和4月都做出了回应,确定三种自给自足的配体-受体对浆细胞维持:BAFF-TACI,APRIL-TACI和APRIL-BCMA。一起,这些参与者占循环抗体的90%。在BAFF-ko小鼠中,APRIL抑制后浆细胞的减少表明APRIL可以在不存在BAFF-APRIL异聚体的情况下发挥作用。没有发现在不存在BCMA和TACI的情况下,APRIL与蛋白聚糖的结合将有助于维持浆细胞的证据。IL-6,单独或与BAFF和4月一起,主要支持脾浆细胞和浆细胞,并有助于循环IgG而不是IgA水平。总之,浆细胞的存活因子可以随身体位置和浆细胞产生的抗体同种型而变化。为了有效地靶向浆细胞,特别是产生IgA的,需要BAFF和APRIL的双重抑制。
    Antibody-producing plasma cells fuel humoral immune responses. They also contribute to autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus or IgA nephropathy. Interleukin-6 and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family ligands BAFF (B cell-activating factor) and APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) participate in plasma cell survival. BAFF binds to three receptors, BAFFR (BAFF receptor), TACI (transmembrane activator and CAML interactor), and BCMA (B cell maturation antigen), while APRIL binds to TACI, BCMA, and proteoglycans. However, which ligand-receptor pair(s) are required to maintain plasma cells in different body locations remains unknown. Here, by combining mouse genetic and pharmacological approaches, we found that plasma cells required BCMA and/or TACI but not BAFFR. BCMA responded exclusively to APRIL, while TACI responded to both BAFF and APRIL, identifying three self-sufficient ligand-receptor pairs for plasma cell maintenance: BAFF-TACI, APRIL-TACI, and APRIL-BCMA. Together, these actors accounted for 90% of circulating antibodies. In BAFF-ko mice, the reduction of plasma cells upon APRIL inhibition indicated that APRIL could function in the absence of BAFF-APRIL heteromers. No evidence was found that in the absence of BCMA and TACI, binding of APRIL to proteoglycans would help maintain plasma cells. IL-6, alone or together with BAFF and APRIL, supported mainly splenic plasmablasts and plasma cells and contributed to circulating IgG but not IgA levels. In conclusion, survival factors for plasma cells can vary with body location and with the antibody isotype that plasma cells produce. To efficiently target plasma cells, in particular IgA-producing ones, dual inhibition of BAFF and APRIL is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    HCV及其后遗症的治疗主要基于干扰素(IFN)。然而,由于其免疫刺激作用,这与显著的不良事件相关.自从他们的介绍,直接作用的抗病毒药物(DAA),已成为治疗HCV及其并发症(包括混合型冷球蛋白性血管炎(MCV))的标准护理。尽管实现持续的病毒应答(SVR),有许多报道描述了不受欢迎的并发症,如肝细胞和血液系统恶性肿瘤以及复发。由多种因素引起的长时间炎症,会导致DNA损伤并影响BAFF和4月,作为B细胞增殖的标志物。我们比较,头对头,HCV-MCV治疗的三种抗病毒方案关于治疗反应和复发,基于聚乙二醇干扰素α和游离方案的BAFF和APRIL水平(索非布韦+利巴韦林;SOF-RIBA,Sofosbuvir+Daclatasvir;SOF-DACLA)。关于临床反应HCV-MCV和SVR;在3种不同的治疗方案中没有发现显著差异,这也是使用IFN的独立形式。我们发现基于IFN和游离方案的DNA损伤之间没有显着差异,DNA修复的标记,或BAFF和4月的水平。然而,个体化药物间比较显示出许多差异.那些用基于IFN的方案治疗的人显示出降低的DNA损伤水平,而另外两个无IFN组的DNA损伤增加,是SOF-DACLA组最差的。在SOF-DACLA组中,3种方案的随访期间BAFF水平升高,效果最好(24周时降低)。在SOF-RIBA,CG在随访期间明显复发。我们使用基于IFN的方案治疗的患者均未出现明显的临床实验室复发。那些接受无IFNDAA的人显示出统计学上显着的体质表现复发。我们的发现表明,基于IFN的方案可有效治疗HCV-MCV,类似于无IFN方案。他们表现出低水平的DNA损伤和修复。我们相信我们的发现可以为淋巴增生的过程提供解释,恶性肿瘤的发生,并通过揭示这种可能的机制而复发。
    The treatment of HCV and its sequelae are used to be predominantly based on Interferon (IFN). However, this was associated with significant adverse events as a result of its immunostimulant capabilities. Since their introduction, the directly acting antiviral drugs (DAAs), have become the standard of care to treat of HCV and its complications including mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (MCV). In spite of achieving sustained viral response (SVR), there appeared many reports describing unwelcome complications such as hepatocellular and hematological malignancies as well as relapses. Prolonged inflammation induced by a multitude of factors, can lead to DNA damage and affects BAFF and APRIL, which serve as markers of B-cell proliferation. We compared, head-to-head, three antiviral protocols for HCV-MCV treatment As regards the treatment response and relapse, levels of BAFF and APRIL among pegylated interferon α-based and free regimens (Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin; SOF-RIBA, Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir; SOF-DACLA). Regarding clinical response HCV-MCV and SVR; no significant differences could be identified among the 3 different treatment protocols, and this was also independent form using IFN. We found no significant differences between IFN-based and free regimens DNA damage, markers of DNA repair, or levels of BAFF and APRIL. However, individualized drug-to-drug comparisons showed many differences. Those who were treated with IFN-based protocol showed decreased levels of DNA damage, while the other two IFN-free groups showed increased DNA damage, being the worst in SOF-DACLA group. There were increased levels of BAFF through follow-up periods in the 3 protocols being the best in SOF-DACLA group (decreased at 24 weeks). In SOF-RIBA, CGs relapsed significantly during the follow-up period. None of our patients who were treated with IFN-based protocol had significant clinico-laboratory relapse. Those who received IFN-free DAAs showed a statistically significant relapse of constitutional manifestations. Our findings suggest that IFN-based protocols are effective in treating HCV-MCV similar to IFN-free protocols. They showed lower levels of DNA damage and repair. We believe that our findings may offer an explanation for the process of lymphoproliferation, occurrence of malignancies, and relapses by shedding light on such possible mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫球蛋白A肾病是世界范围内肾小球肾炎的最普遍原因,在儿科和成人受试者的相关病例中可能导致肾衰竭。虽然它们的发病机制在很大程度上还不清楚,免疫异常的证据为使用免疫抑制药物提供了背景,比如皮质类固醇,钙调磷酸酶抑制剂,和抗增殖和烷化剂。不幸的是,这些治疗未能在很大比例的受影响患者中实现持续缓解,并且承受着显著的毒性负担.新生物制剂的最新发展,包括抗BAFF/APRIL抑制剂和靶向补体成分的分子,提供了选择性靶向免疫细胞亚群或激活途径的机会,导致更有效和更安全的假设驱动的治疗。然而,在IgAN中测试新生物制剂的研究还应考虑儿科人群,以满足儿童的独特需求,并缩小成人和儿科之间的治疗差距.
    Immunoglobulin A nephropathy represents the most prevalent cause of glomerulonephritis worldwide and may lead to renal failure in a relevant number of cases in both paediatric and adult subjects. Although their pathogenesis is still largely unclear, evidence of immune abnormalities provides the background for the use of immunosuppressive drugs, such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and antiproliferative and alkylating agents. Unfortunately, these treatments fail to achieve a sustained remission in a significant percentage of affected patients and are burdened by significant toxicities. Recent developments of new biologics, including anti-BAFF/APRIL inhibitors and molecules targeting complement components, offered the opportunity to selectively target immune cell subsets or activation pathways, leading to more effective and safer hypothesis-driven treatments. However, studies testing new biologic agents in IgAN should also consider paediatric populations to address the unique needs of children and close the therapeutic gap between adult and paediatric care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    来自肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)家族的细胞因子是生理和病理过程的重要调节因子。新的TNF配体和受体的发现,BAFF和4月,为科学家探索这些细胞因子对人体免疫系统的影响开辟了新的可能性。BAFF/APRIL系统在B淋巴细胞中的作用对于生存和维持稳态尤为重要。该系统的异常表达与各种免疫疾病有关。因此,本研究从文献计量学的角度全面概述了过去和现在的BAFF/APRIL系统的研究进展。据我们所知,这是首次针对BAFF/APRIL系统进行的文献计量分析。从WoSCC共检索到1055个相关文档。MicrosoftExcel,VOSviewer,R工作室的Biblioshiny是用于分析科学文献的文献计量工具。从1999年开始,年度出版物呈上升趋势,《免疫学杂志》是最有成效的杂志。美国在BAFF/APRIL系统研究开发方面处于领先地位。PascalSchneider,洛桑大学的高级研究员,瑞士被认为是BAFF/APRIL系统研究领域最有生产力的作者和机构。研究重点从专注于系统在B细胞生物学中的作用转变。免疫疾病,最后是BAFF/APRIL靶向药物的开发。尽管一些研究简要阐明了BAFF/APRIL系统在B细胞选择中的通路机制,关于疾病模型和T细胞活化的作用机制的大量研究以及来自天然来源的免疫调节药物的开发仍未被探索。因此,针对这些领域的未来研究对于更深入地了解疾病表现和进展的系统至关重要,从而可以更好地治疗各种免疫疾病。
    Cytokines from the Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) family are important regulators of both physiological and pathological processes. The discovery of novel TNF ligands and receptors, BAFF and APRIL, have opened up new possibilities for scientists to explore the effect of these cytokines on the human immune system. The role of BAFF/APRIL system in B lymphocytes is particularly important for survival and maintenance of homeostasis. Aberrant expression of the system is associated with various immunological disorders. Hence, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the past and present BAFF/APRIL system research development in a bibliometric perspective. To our best knowledge, this is the first ever bibliometric analysis conducted focusing on the BAFF/APRIL system. A total of 1055 relevant documents were retrieved from WoSCC. Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer, and Biblioshiny of R studio were bibliometric tools used to analyse the scientific literature. From 1999, the annual publications showed an upward trend, with Journal of Immunology being the most productive journal. USA leads the race for BAFF/APRIL system research developments. Pascal Schneider, a senior researcher affiliated with University of Lausanne, Switzerland was recognised as the most productive author and institution in the BAFF/APRIL system research field. The research focus transitioned from focusing on the role of the system in B cell biology, to immunological disorders and finally to development of BAFF/APRIL targeting drugs. Despite several studies elucidating briefly the pathway mechanism of BAFF/APRIL system in B-cell selection, substantial research on the mechanism of action in disease models and T cell activation and development of immunomodulating drugs from natural origins remains largely unexplored. Therefore, future research focusing on these areas are crucial for the deeper understanding of the system in disease manifestations and progression allowing a better treatment management for various immunological disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的特征是CD19CD5B细胞的扩增,但其起源仍存在争议。突变的CLL可以源自生发后中心B细胞,而未突变的CLL可以源自CD5+成熟B细胞前体。不考虑前体类型,启动CLL的事件仍然未知。细胞因子BAFF和APRIL各自在CLL细胞存活和积累中起重要作用,但他们是否参与疾病的发生尚不清楚.
    我们生成了缺乏BAFF或APRIL的新型CLL模型。进行体内实验以探索BAFF或APRIL丢失对白血病发生的影响。programming,和传播。此外,进行RNA-seq和定量实时PCR以揭示CLL中受BAFF影响的转录组特征。在离体患者来源的原代CLL细胞中进一步评估了BAFF在控制肿瘤促进基因表达中的直接作用。
    我们的研究结果证明了BAFF的关键作用,但不是4月,在CLL细胞的起始和传播中。在缺乏BAFF或其受体BAFF-R的情况下,TCL1转基因仅增加腹膜腔中的CLL细胞数量,没有传播到外围。虽然BAFF与BAFF-R的结合对于腹膜CLL细胞存活是不必要的,有必要激活肿瘤促进基因程序,可能与CLL启动和进展有关。在离体的患者来源的原代CLL细胞中证实了BAFF在控制肿瘤促进基因表达中的直接作用。
    我们的研究,涉及小鼠和人类CLL细胞,提示BAFF可能通过独立于细胞存活的机制启动CLL。将当前的CLL疗法与BAFF抑制组合可以通过减少外周肿瘤负荷和抑制转化的CLL细胞输出来提供双重益处。
    Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the expansion of CD19+ CD5+ B cells but its origin remains debated. Mutated CLL may originate from post-germinal center B cells and unmutated CLL from CD5+ mature B cell precursors. Irrespective of precursor types, events initiating CLL remain unknown. The cytokines BAFF and APRIL each play a significant role in CLL cell survival and accumulation, but their involvement in disease initiation remains unclear.
    We generated novel CLL models lacking BAFF or APRIL. In vivo experiments were conducted to explore the impact of BAFF or APRIL loss on leukemia initiation, progression, and dissemination. Additionally, RNA-seq and quantitative real-time PCR were performed to unveil the transcriptomic signature influenced by BAFF in CLL. The direct role of BAFF in controlling the expression of tumor-promoting genes was further assessed in patient-derived primary CLL cells ex-vivo.
    Our findings demonstrate a crucial role for BAFF, but not APRIL, in the initiation and dissemination of CLL cells. In the absence of BAFF or its receptor BAFF-R, the TCL1 transgene only increases CLL cell numbers in the peritoneal cavity, without dissemination into the periphery. While BAFF binding to BAFF-R is dispensable for peritoneal CLL cell survival, it is necessary to activate a tumor-promoting gene program, potentially linked to CLL initiation and progression. This direct role of BAFF in controlling the expression of tumor-promoting genes was confirmed in patient-derived primary CLL cells ex-vivo.
    Our study, involving both mouse and human CLL cells, suggests that BAFF might initiate CLL through mechanisms independent of cell survival. Combining current CLL therapies with BAFF inhibition could offer a dual benefit by reducing peripheral tumor burden and suppressing transformed CLL cell output.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对内质网(ER)应激的细胞反应伴随着浆细胞的成熟,并且是局部炎症反应的触发因素和辅因子之一。化学伴侣,消除病理性内质网应激的低分子物质,被提议作为治疗与内质网应激相关的病理的手段。这项研究的目的是评估低剂量过敏模型中化学伴侣对体液反应的影响和机制。通过以100ng的剂量重复施用卵清蛋白6周在BALB/c小鼠中诱导过敏性免疫应答。一些动物被注射了抗原和化学伴侣,TUDCA(牛磺熊去氧胆酸)或4-PBA(4-苯基丁酸)。TUDCA的管理,但不是4-PBA,抑制过敏原特异性IgE的产生(滴度降低2.5倍)。没有化学伴侣影响特异性IgG1的产生。TUDCA的作用与抑制区域淋巴结向IgE合成的转换有关。这种现象与编码参与2型免疫反应的细胞因子的基因表达抑制有关。特别是Il4和Il9,这反过来可能是由IL-33释放的抑制引起的。此外,TUDCA显著抑制细胞因子APRIL的表达,在较小程度上,BAFF.因此,TUDCA抑制过敏特异性IgE的产生是由于抑制IL-33的释放和减少2型免疫反应细胞因子的产生,以及抑制细胞因子APRIL和BAFF的表达。
    The cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress accompanies plasma cell maturation and is one of triggers and cofactors of the local inflammatory response. Chemical chaperones, low-molecular substances that eliminate pathological ER stress, are proposed as means of treating pathologies associated with ER stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect and mechanisms of influence of chemical chaperones on the humoral response in a low-dose model of allergy. The allergic immune response was induced in BALB/c mice by repeated administration of ovalbumin at a dose of 100 ng for 6 weeks. Some animals were injected with both the antigen and the chemical chaperones, TUDCA (tauroursodeoxycholic acid) or 4-PBA (4-phenylbutyrate). Administration of TUDCA, but not 4-PBA, suppressed production of allergen-specific IgE (a 2.5-fold decrease in titer). None of the chemical chaperones affected the production of specific IgG1. The effect of TUDCA was associated with suppression of the switch to IgE synthesis in regional lymph nodes. This phenomenon was associated with suppressed expression of genes encoding cytokines involved in type 2 immune response, especially Il4 and Il9, which in turn could be caused by suppression of IL-33 release. In addition, TUDCA significantly suppressed expression of the cytokine APRIL, and to a lesser extent, BAFF. Thus, TUDCA inhibition of the allergy-specific IgE production is due to suppression of the release of IL-33 and a decrease in the production of type 2 immune response cytokines, as well as suppression of the expression of the cytokines APRIL and BAFF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫球蛋白A肾病(IgAN)是最常见的原发性肾小球疾病,“四击”理论代表了其目前公认的致病机制。呼吸道感染引发的粘膜免疫,肠子,或其他区域导致抗原呈递,T细胞刺激,B细胞成熟,和产生IgA的浆细胞的产生。蛋白质B淋巴细胞刺激因子(BLyS)和增殖诱导配体(APRIL)参与此过程,和替代补体和凝集素途径激活也是致病机制的一部分。肾脏疾病改善全球预后指南指出,目前尚缺乏针对IgAN的特定有效治疗方法,肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂是主要治疗方法。最近的研究表明,生物制剂可以显著减少蛋白尿,稳定估计的肾小球滤过率,逆转一些病理变化,如毛细血管内增殖和新月形成。用于治疗IgA肾病的生物制剂主要有四类,特别是抗CD20单克隆抗体,抗BLyS或APRIL单克隆抗体,靶向BLyS和APRIL(telitacicept和atacicept)的单克隆抗体,和抑制补体系统激活的单克隆抗体(纳索普利单抗和依库珠单抗)。然而,对剂量的进一步研究,治疗持续时间,长期疗效,并且需要这些生物制剂的安全性。
    Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular disease, and the \"four-hit\" theory represents its currently accepted pathogenic mechanism. Mucosal immunity triggered by infections in the respiratory tract, intestines, or other areas leads to antigen presentation, T cell stimulation, B cell maturation, and the production of IgA-producing plasma cells. The proteins B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) are involved in this process, and alternative complement and lectin pathway activation are also part of the pathogenic mechanism. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines indicate that a specific effective treatment for IgAN is lacking, with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors being the primary therapy. Recent research shows that biological agents can significantly reduce proteinuria, stabilize the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and reverse some pathological changes, such as endocapillary proliferation and crescent formation. There are four main categories of biological agents used to treat IgA nephropathy, specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, anti-BLyS or APRIL monoclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies targeting both BLyS and APRIL (telitacicept and atacicept), and monoclonal antibodies inhibiting complement system activation (narsoplimab and eculizumab). However, further research on the dosages, treatment duration, long-term efficacy, and safety of these biological agents is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌是一种复杂且具有挑战性的疾病,是全球癌症相关死亡的最常见原因之一。在肺微环境中,特异性细胞因子,包括B细胞活化因子(BAFF)和A增殖诱导配体(APRIL),是由各种细胞产生的,尤其是气道上皮细胞,在反应过敏性炎症或肺部感染。这些细胞因子在维持局部免疫应答和促进免疫细胞存活中起关键作用。BAFF和APRIL系统已在一系列恶性肿瘤中联系在一起,并显示出它们在诱导耐药性和促进癌症进展方面的潜力。这篇综述强调了最近关于BAFF和APRIL在各种癌症中的参与的研究。主要关注它们在肺癌中的作用,并讨论了这些分子在肺部感染后导致耐药性和癌症进展的可能性。我们建议考虑靶向BAFF和APRIL或它们各自的受体作为有效治疗肺癌的有希望的新疗法。尤其是肺部感染后.然而,开展进一步研究以充分阐明BAFF和APRIL系统如何提高癌症生存率和肺部感染后的耐药性的确切机制仍然很重要.
    Lung cancer is a complicated and challenging disease and is one of the most common causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Within the lung microenvironment, specific cytokines, including the B cell activation factor (BAFF) and the A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), are produce by various cells, notably airway epithelial cells, in response allergic inflammation or pulmonary infection. These cytokines play a critical role in maintaining local immune responses and fostering the survival of immune cells. The BAFF and APRIL system have been connected in a range of malignancies and have shown their potential in inducing drug resistance and promoting cancer progression. This review highlights recent studies on the involvement of BAFF and APRIL in various cancers, focusing mainly on their role in lung cancer, and discusses the possibility of these molecules in contributing to drug resistance and cancer progression following pulmonary infection. We suggest consideration the targeting BAFF and APRIL or their respective receptors as promising novel therapies for effective treatment of lung cancer, especially post pulmonary infection. However, it remains important to conduct further investigations to fully elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying how the BAFF and APRIL systems enhance cancer survival and drug resistance subsequent pulmonary infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. Approximately 30% to 45% of patients progress to kidney failure (KF) within 20 to 25 years of diagnosis, and there has long been a lack of effective treatments. The therapeutic landscape in IgAN is rapidly evolving, driven in large part by the acceptance of the surrogate clinical trial end point of proteinuria reduction by regulatory authorities for the accelerated approval of new therapies. Two drugs, targeted release formulation (TRF)-budesonide (nefecon) and sparsentan, have recently been approved under this scheme. Advancing insights into the pathophysiology of IgAN, including the roles of the mucosal immune system, B-cells, the complement system, and the endothelin system have driven development of therapies that target these factors. This review outlines current, recently approved, and emerging therapies for IgAN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)可导致肾移植后移植失败。中性粒细胞在AMR进展中起关键作用,但确切的机制尚不清楚。我们在小鼠肾移植模型中研究了中性粒细胞对AMR的影响。将小鼠分为五组:同基因移植(Syn),同种异体移植(Allo),和三个不同治疗的AMR组。使用皮肤移植物建立AMR小鼠模型以预先致敏受体小鼠。基于AMR模型,施用Ly6G特异性单克隆抗体以耗尽嗜中性粒细胞(NEUT-/-+AMR),并且使用TACI-Fc来阻断B细胞活化因子(BAFF)/增殖诱导配体(APRIL)信号传导(TACI-Fc+AMR)。使用苏木精-伊红和免疫组织化学染色评估病理变化。使用Banff2015标准评估了Banff值。使用流式细胞术评估供体特异性抗体(DSA)水平,使用ELISA测量BAFF和APRIL浓度。与Syn和Allo组相比,在AMR小鼠中观察到中性粒细胞数量显着增加,C4d和IgG沉积增加,伴随着DSA水平的升高。中性粒细胞耗竭抑制炎性细胞浸润并减少C4d和IgG沉积。中性粒细胞耗竭显著降低移植后DSA水平,抑制BAFF和APRIL浓度,提示减轻AMR诱导的移植物损伤的机制。使用TACI-Fc融合蛋白阻断BAFF/APRIL后获得类似结果。总之,AMR小鼠肾移植模型中性粒细胞浸润增加。中性粒细胞耗竭或阻断BAFF/APRIL信号通路可显著缓解AMR,为临床治疗AMR提供更好的选择。
    Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) can cause graft failure following renal transplantation. Neutrophils play a key role in AMR progression, but the exact mechanism remains unclear. We investigated the effect of neutrophils on AMR in a mouse kidney transplantation model. The mice were divided into five groups: syngeneic transplantation (Syn), allograft transplantation (Allo), and three differently treated AMR groups. The AMR mouse model was established using skin grafts to pre-sensitize recipient mice. Based on the AMR model, Ly6G-specific monoclonal antibodies were administered to deplete neutrophils (NEUT-/- + AMR) and TACI-Fc was used to block B-cell-activating factor (BAFF)/a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) signaling (TACI-Fc + AMR). Pathological changes were assessed using hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining. Banff values were evaluated using the Banff 2015 criteria. Donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels were assessed using flow cytometry, and BAFF and APRIL concentrations were measured using ELISA. Compared to the Syn and Allo groups, a significantly increased number of neutrophils and increased C4d and IgG deposition were observed in AMR mice, accompanied by elevated DSA levels. Neutrophil depletion inhibited inflammatory cell infiltration and reduced C4d and IgG deposition. Neutrophil depletion significantly decreased DSA levels after transplantation and suppressed BAFF and APRIL concentrations, suggesting a mechanism for attenuating AMR-induced graft damage. Similar results were obtained after blockading BAFF/APRIL using a TACI-Fc fusion protein. In summary, neutrophil infiltration increased in the AMR mouse renal transplantation model. Neutrophil depletion or blockading the BAFF/APRIL signaling pathway significantly alleviated AMR and may provide better options for the clinical treatment of AMR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号