ALPPS

ALPPS
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近,ALPPS(联合肝分区和门静脉结扎分期肝切除术)已成为广泛已知的实现肝切除的快速未来的肝残余肥大,但是它伴随着术中的困难,并发症增加。这项研究旨在报告低收入和中等收入国家的肿瘤中心在患有ALPPS的肝肿瘤患者及其技术变体中的结果。这些发明是为了克服ALPPS手术的术中困难。
    对2022年9月至2023年12月接受ALPPS的患者进行了回顾性分析。
    共有25例患者接受了ALPPS手术:21例肝细胞癌(HCC)手术,3联合肝细胞胆管癌(cHCC-CCA),1为小细胞神经内分泌癌(SNEC)。术后平均住院时间为29.6±9.3天(范围16-58天)。在第1阶段之后,我们计算了8个并发症,全部为II级;在第2阶段后,并发症的数量减少到3:2为I级,1为IIIB级。3例(12%)患者未能进入ALPPS2期。经过9个月的中位随访(范围2-25),已记录3例患者(12%)的疾病复发,1名患者(4%)死亡,受HCC影响。全组2年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为83.3%和82.5%,分别。
    ALPPS程序是一种在低收入和中等收入国家中具有可接受的OS和DFS的未来肝脏残留小的大型肝脏肿瘤的方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Recently, the ALPPS (Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) has become widely known to achieve hepatic resection by rapid future liver remnant hypertrophy, but it comes with intraoperative difficulties, followed by increased complications. This study aimed to report the outcomes of an oncology center in a low-income and middle-income country with ALPPS in patients with liver tumors and its technical variants, which were invented to overcome intraoperative difficulties of the ALPPS procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing ALPPS from September 2022 to December 2023 was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 25 patients underwent the ALPPS procedure: 21 procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 3 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), and 1 for small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC). The mean postoperative stay was 29.6 ± 9.3 days (range 16-58 days). After stage 1, we counted 8 complications, all of grade II; after stage 2, the number of complications was decreased to 3:2 were of grade I and 1 were of grade IIIB. 3 (12%) patients failed to proceed to ALPPS stage 2. After a median follow-up of 9 months (range 2-25), disease recurrence has been recorded in 3 patients (12%), while 1 patient (4%) died, affected by HCC. The entire group\'s 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 83.3% and 82.5%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The ALPPS procedure is an approach for large liver tumors with small future liver remnant with acceptable OS and DFS in a low-income and middle-income country.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝纤维化对ALPPS后肝再生率和并发症的影响尚未完全了解。本研究旨在研究肝纤维化对术后并发症的影响,以及ALPPS后的预后。收集2014年5月至2022年10月在北京协和医院接受ALPPS治疗的原发性肝癌患者的临床数据。使用苏木精-伊红染色和天狼星红染色评估肝纤维化的程度。这项研究包括30例原发性肝癌患者接受ALPPS治疗,有23例肝细胞癌患者,5患有胆管癌,2合并肝细胞-胆管癌。重度肝纤维化对肝再生率的影响无统计学意义(P=0.892)。所有严重并发症患者均属于重度肝纤维化组。严重肝纤维化与90天死亡率(P=0.014)和总生存率(P=0.012)显着相关。严重的肝纤维化是ALPPS第二步后肝衰竭和围手术期死亡率的关键危险因素。术前肝功能损害是术后肝功能衰竭的重要预测因素。
    The influence of liver fibrosis on the rate of liver regeneration and complications following ALPPS has yet to be fully understood. This study aimed to scrutinize the effects of liver fibrosis on the postoperative complications, and prognosis subsequent to ALPPS. Clinical data were collected from patients with primary liver cancer who underwent ALPPS at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between May 2014 and October 2022. The degree of liver fibrosis was assessed using haematoxylin-eosin staining and Sirius red staining. This study encompassed thirty patients who underwent ALPPS for primary liver cancer, and there were 23 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 5 with cholangiocarcinoma, and 2 with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. The impact of severe liver fibrosis on the rate of liver regeneration was not statistically significant (P = 0.892). All patients with severe complications belonged to the severe liver fibrosis group. Severe liver fibrosis exhibited a significant association with 90 days mortality (P = 0.014) and overall survival (P = 0.012). Severe liver fibrosis emerges as a crucial risk factor for liver failure and perioperative mortality following the second step of ALPPS. Preoperative liver function impairment is an important predictive factor for postoperative liver failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝脏流出阻塞是活体肝移植后危及生命的事件。在这里,我们抢救了一名患者,该患者因右半肝切除术加尾状叶切除术联合肝中静脉切除术(MHV)后左肝静脉(LHV)弯曲而引起的残留左半肝流出阻塞。8年前,一名50岁的患者在切除右乳腺癌后发现了一个大小为6厘米的肝尾状叶转移瘤,涉及MHV的根部。使用两期肝切除术(部分TIPEALPPS)进行右半肝切除术和尾状叶切除术联合MHV切除术。在第1天,总胆红素值增加到4.5mg/dL,动态计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描显示弯曲的LHV。关于左肝流出阻滞的诊断,使用介入方法将自膨式金属支架放置在LHV中,LHV中的压力从27cmH2O降低到12cmH2O。第3天胆红素值降至1.2mg/dL。扩大右半肝切除术并切除MHV后,可能会发生LHV的流出阻滞。早期诊断和介入支架治疗可以挽救充血性肝衰竭患者。
    Outflow block of the liver is a life-threatening event after living donor liver transplantation. Herein, we rescued a patient suffering from the outflow block of the remnant left hemiliver caused by bending of the left hepatic vein (LHV) after right hemihepatectomy plus caudate lobectomy combined with resection of the middle hepatic vein (MHV). A metastatic tumor sized 6 cm in the caudate lobe of the liver involving the root of the MHV was found in a 50\'s year old patient after resection of a right breast cancer eight years ago. Right hemihepatectomy and caudate lobectomy combined with resection of the MHV was performed using a two-stage hepatectomy (partial TIPE ALPPS). On day 1, the total bilirubin value increased to 4.5 mg/dL, and a dynamic computed tomography (CT) scan showed the bent LHV. On the diagnosis of outflow block of the left liver, a self-expandable metallic stent was placed in the LHV using an interventional approach, and the pressure in the LHV decreased from 27 cmH2O to 12 cmH2O. The bilirubin value decreased to 1.2 mg/dL on day 3. Outflow block of the LHV can happen after extended right hemihepatectomy with resection of the MHV. Early diagnosis and interventional stenting treatment can rescue the patient from congestive liver failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结直肠肝转移(CRLM)代表继发性肝肿瘤的最普遍形式,未来肝脏残存量(FLR)不足通常会导致无法切除。为了应对这一挑战,已经开发了各种刺激肝脏肥大的方法,包括门静脉栓塞(PVE),联合肝分区和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术(ALPPS)和最新的,肝静脉剥夺(LVD)。在过去的十年中,ALPPS得到了彻底的研究,并且已经证明它可以诱导快速而强烈的FLR肥大。这项研究的目的是评估ALPPS初期肝脏横断线的定位是否与FLR肥大程度相关。
    回顾,进行了多中心研究,我们分析了所有连续8年接受ALPPS治疗的CRLM患者.根据切除类型将患者分为两组,分别为右三节切除术(ERH)或右半肝切除术(RH)。肥大程度(DH),评估其与FLR和术后结局的相关性.
    该队列包括136名患者(ERH组72名,RH组64名)。基线特征,肥大间隔,和总肝脏体积显示两组之间没有显着差异。DH在ERH组中更高(83.2%vs.62.5%,p=0.025)。在两组中,FLR体积与DH之间均呈强负相关。术后结局和一年生存率在两组之间具有可比性。
    FLR肥大受ALPPS中肝脏横切线定位的影响。此外,相关分析表明,较小的估计FLR与较大的DH相关。两组之间的结果无统计学差异。
    UNASSIGNED: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) represent the most prevalent form of secondary liver tumors, and insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) often leads to unresectability. To tackle this challenge, various methods for stimulating liver hypertrophy have been developed including portal vein embolization (PVE), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and the newest one, liver venous deprivation (LVD). ALPPS was thoroughly studied over the last decade and it has been shown to induce rapid and intensive FLR hypertrophy. The objective of this study was to assess whether the localization of the liver transection line during the initial stage of ALPPS correlates with the degree of FLR hypertrophy.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective, multicentric study was conducted, and we analyzed all consecutive patients with CRLMs who underwent ALPPS over the eight-year period. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of resection-right trisectionectomy (ERH) or right hemihepatectomy (RH) respectively. The degree of hypertrophy (DH), its correlation with FLR and postoperative outcomes were assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: The cohort consisted of 136 patients (72 in the ERH group and 64 in the RH group). Baseline characteristics, hypertrophy interval, and total liver volume showed no significant differences between the groups. DH was greater in the ERH group (83.2% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.025). A strong negative correlation was observed between FLR volume and DH in both groups. Postoperative outcomes and one-year survival were comparable between the groups.
    UNASSIGNED: FLR hypertrophy is influenced by the localization of the liver transection line in ALPPS. Furthermore, correlation analysis indicated that a smaller estimated FLR is associated with greater DH. No statistical difference in outcomes was noted between the groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    乳糜腹水是一种罕见的病理,在肝胰胆管手术后发病率低,在联合肝分区和门静脉结扎进行分期肝切除术(ALPPS)后,国际文献中没有报道病例.它是由腹腔内淋巴液的异常积聚引起的,继发于乳糜池或其支流的阻塞或损伤。我们描述了一名49岁女性被诊断患有结肠癌和肝转移的情况。进行了ALPPS,在第一阶段和第二阶段,呈现高排水输出以及排水流体特性的变化。通过发现300mg/dL的引流液中的甘油三酸酯水平来确认乳糜性腹水的诊断。药物治疗是基于高蛋白质饮食和脂肪限制,补充中链甘油三酯和生长抑素类似物,与瘘管分辨率。它可以通过医疗来管理。
    Chylous ascites is an uncommon pathology with low incidence following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery, there are no cases reported in the international literature following the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for stage hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure. It is caused by abnormal intraperitoneal accumulation of lymph fluid in the abdominal cavity secondary to obstruction or injury to the chyle cistern or its tributaries. We describe the case of a 49-year-old woman diagnosed with colon cancer and liver metastasis. ALPPS was performed, on a first and second stage, presenting a high drainage output as well as change in the characteristics of the drainage fluid. The diagnosis of chylous ascites was confirmed by finding triglyceride levels in the drainage fluid at 300 mg/dL. Medical treatment was started based on a hyper-protein diet and fat restriction, supplemented with medium-chain triglycerides and somatostatin analog, with fistula resolution. It can be managed with medical treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在主要不可切除的肝肿瘤中,ALPPS(联合肝分区和门静脉结扎用于分期肝切除术)可以提供治愈性的两阶段肝切除术,通过快速和广泛的肥大。然而,人们对该程序的侵入性提出了担忧。全机器人ALPPS有可能通过侵入性较小的途径降低术后发病率。这项研究的目的是比较开放式和全机器人ALPPS的围手术期结果。
    方法:双中心研究包括来自苏黎世大学医院的开放性ALPPS病例,瑞士和来自摩德纳大学和雷焦艾米利亚的机器人ALPPS病例,意大利从01/2015到07/2022。主要结果是术中参数和总体并发症。
    结果:36例和7例进行了开放式和全机器人ALPPS。机器人ALPPS与两个阶段后的失血量减少有关(418±237ml与319±197ml;P=0.04和631±354ml与258±53ml;P=0.01)以及更高的级间放电率(86%vs.37%;P=0.02)。两个阶段后,机器人ALPPS的OT时间更长(371±70分钟vs.449±81分钟;P=0.01和282±87分钟vs.373±90分钟;P=0.02)。ALPPS2期后,总体并发症没有差异(86%与86%;P=1.00)和主要并发症(43%vs.39%;P=0.86)。总住院时间相似(23±17天vs.26±13;P=0.56)。
    结论:在有经验的机器人中心,与开放式ALPPS相比,机器人ALPPS是安全实施的,并显示出改善围手术期结局的潜力。机器人方法可能使ALPPS的围手术期风险状况更接近门静脉栓塞/肝静脉剥夺的介入技术。
    BACKGROUND: In primarily unresectable liver tumors, ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) may offer curative two-stage hepatectomy trough a fast and extensive hypertrophy. However, concerns have been raised about the invasiveness of the procedure. Full robotic ALPPS has the potential to reduce the postoperative morbidity trough a less invasive access. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of open and full robotic ALPPS.
    METHODS: The bicentric study included open ALPPS cases from the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland and robotic ALPPS cases from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy from 01/2015 to 07/2022. Main outcomes were intraoperative parameters and overall complications.
    RESULTS: Open and full robotic ALPPS were performed in 36 and 7 cases. Robotic ALPPS was associated with less blood loss after both stages (418 ± 237 ml vs. 319 ± 197 ml; P = 0.04 and 631 ± 354 ml vs. 258 ± 53 ml; P = 0.01) as well as a higher rate of interstage discharge (86% vs. 37%; P = 0.02). OT was longer with robotic ALPPS after both stages (371 ± 70 min vs. 449 ± 81 min; P = 0.01 and 282 ± 87 min vs. 373 ± 90 min; P = 0.02). After ALPPS stage 2, there was no difference for overall complications (86% vs. 86%; P = 1.00) and major complications (43% vs. 39%; P = 0.86). The total length of hospital stay was similar (23 ± 17 days vs. 26 ± 13; P = 0.56).
    CONCLUSIONS: Robotic ALPPS was safely implemented and showed potential for improved perioperative outcomes compared to open ALPPS in an experienced robotic center. The robotic approach might bring the perioperative risk profile of ALPPS closer to interventional techniques of portal vein embolization/liver venous deprivation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与经典的两阶段肝切除术相比,ALPPS可以在更短的时间间隔和更多的患者中进行完整的肿瘤切除。然而,关于结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)患者的长期结局的证据很少.本研究旨在评估CRM患者ALPPS的短期和长期结果。单个队列,prospective,观察性研究。包括在2011年6月至2021年6月期间因肝脏残存量不足而无法切除的CLM患者。在接受治疗的32名患者中,21人为男性(66%),中位年龄为56岁(范围=29-81)。这两个阶段都完成了30例(93.7%),R0率为75%(24/32)。主要发病率为37.5%,死亡率为零。中位总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)分别为28.1和8.8个月,分别。1-3和5年OS为86%,45%,21%,RFS是42%,14%,14%,分别。与不良RFS(5.7vs11.6个月;p=0.038)和OS(15vs37个月;p=0.009)相关的唯一独立危险因素是未接受辅助化疗。KRAS突变与疾病诊断的OS差相关(24.3与38.9个月;p=0.025)。ALPPS与良好的肿瘤学结果相关,与传统策略相比,可以提高CLM和高肿瘤负荷患者的可切除性。我们的结果首次表明,辅助化疗与ALPPS后更好的短期和长期预后独立相关。选择有KRAS突变的患者应谨慎,因为这可能会影响肿瘤的结果。
    ALPPS enables complete tumor resection in a shorter interval and a larger number of patients than classic two-stage hepatectomies. However, there is little evidence regarding long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). This study aims to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of ALPPS in patients with CRM. Single-cohort, prospective, observational study. Patients with unresectable CLM due to insufficient liver remnant who underwent ALPPS between June 2011 and June 2021 were included. Of 32 patients treated, 21 were male (66%) and the median age was 56 years (range = 29-81). Both stages were completed in 30 patients (93.7%), with an R0 rate of 75% (24/32). Major morbidity was 37.5% and the mortality nil. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 28.1 and 8.8 months, respectively. The 1-3, and 5-year OS was 86%, 45%, and 21%, and RFS was 42%, 14%, and 14%, respectively. The only independent risk factor associated with poor RFS (5.7 vs 11.6 months; p = 0.038) and OS (15 vs 37 months; p = 0.009) was not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. KRAS mutation was associated with worse OS from disease diagnosis (24.3 vs. 38.9 months; p = 0.025). ALPPS is associated with favorable oncological outcomes, comparable to traditional strategies to increase resectability in patients with CLM and high tumor burden. Our results suggest for the first time that adjuvant chemotherapy is independently associated with better short- and long-term outcomes after ALPPS. Selection of patients with KRAS mutations should be performed with caution, as this could affect oncological outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肝母细胞瘤是儿科人群中最常见的恶性原发性肝肿瘤,占美国病例的67%。手术切除是唯一的治疗选择;然而,它可以在只有10%的原发性肿瘤患者中进行。切除的两个最常见的限制是需要广泛切除和中央位置的肿瘤。使用ALPPS(联合肝分区和门静脉结扎用于分期肝切除术)实现的健康组织的治疗性肥大可以进行更大的切除,并且近年来已成功用于儿科人群。
    介绍3例位于中央的PRETEXTII或III型肝母细胞瘤患者接受ALPPS手术作为肝移植的可行治疗替代方案。
    中央PRETEXTIII型肝母细胞瘤通常是肝移植的适应症。移植提供了很高的五年生存率(73%)。然而,相关的发病率,医疗保健系统成本,和有限的可用性使得有必要探索替代方案。系列报道了ALPPS程序在其他位置的PRETEXTII和PRETEXTIII肝母细胞瘤中的成功应用。治疗性肥大,特征在于未受影响的叶或段中健康组织的体积增加,能够切除先前认为不可切除的病变。患者经历了简单的术后过程和预期的肿瘤标志物减少。化疗选择遵循SIOPLIV方案的第C部分概述的指南。
    ALPPS肝切除术是位于中央的PRETEXTIII或II型肝母细胞瘤患者的可行治疗选择。
    UNASSIGNED: Hepatoblastoma is the most common malignant primary liver tumor in the pediatric population, accounting for 67% of cases in the United States. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment option; however, it can be performed in only 10% of patients with primary tumors. The two most common limitations for resection are the need for extensive resections and tumors in central locations. The therapeutic hypertrophy of healthy tissue achieved with ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged Hepatectomy) enables larger resections and has been successfully employed in the pediatric population in recent years.
    UNASSIGNED: To present three cases of patients with centrally located PRETEXT II or III hepatoblastomas who underwent ALPPS procedure as a viable therapeutic alternative to liver transplantation.
    UNASSIGNED: Central PRETEXT III hepatoblastomas are typically indications for liver transplantation. Transplantation offers high five-year survival rates (73%). However, the associated morbidity, healthcare system costs, and limited availability make it necessary to explore alternative options. Series have reported the successful application of the ALPPS procedure in PRETEXT II and PRETEXT III hepatoblastomas in other locations. Therapeutically induced hypertrophy, characterized by an increase in the volume of healthy tissue in unaffected lobes or segments, enabled the resection of previously deemed unresectable lesions. The patients experienced uncomplicated postoperative courses and expected reduction in tumor markers. Chemotherapy selection followed the guidelines outlined in Block C of the SIOPEL IV protocol.
    UNASSIGNED: ALPPS hepatectomy is a viable therapeutic option for patients with centrally located PRETEXT III or II hepatoblastomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大型或局部晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗选择疗效有限。这项研究调查了药物洗脱珠子经动脉化疗栓塞(dTACE)的疗效和安全性,门静脉栓塞术(PVE),酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI),和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)相比,联合肝分区和门静脉结扎用于大型或局部晚期HCC的分期肝切除术(ALPPS)。有关临床病理细节的数据,安全,我们回顾了四联疗法(dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI)的肿瘤结局,并与ALPPS进行了比较.从2019年到2020年,10例大型或局部晚期HCC患者接受了未来的残余肝脏(FRL)调制(dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI:5;ALPPS:5)。所有五个dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI案例反应良好,患者#4和#5实现完全肿瘤坏死。总响应率(ORR)为5/5。#1-4患者接受了肝切除术,而#5由于肿瘤完全坏死而拒绝手术。平均FRL体积在2-4个月内增加了75.3%(范围60.0%-89.4%),ALPPS在21-37天内为104.6%(范围51.3%-160.8%)(P=0.032)。1/5ALPPS患者发生主要术后并发症。四联疗法的切除率为4/4,ALPPS的切除率为5/5。dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI和ALPPS的2年无进展生存期分别为5/5和3/5。四联疗法是可行的,通过缩小肿瘤和诱导FRL肥大来增强可切除性的有效策略,可控制的并发症和改善的长期预后。此外,它引发了对ALPPS在分子和免疫治疗时代的应用的重新审视。
    Therapeutic options for large or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have limited efficacy. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads trans-arterial chemo-embolization (dTACE), portal vein embolization (PVE), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) compared to Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for large or locally advanced HCC.Data regarding clinicopathological details, safety, and oncological outcomes were reviewed for the quadruple therapy (dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI) and compared with ALPPS.From 2019 to 2020, 10 patients with large or locally advanced HCC underwent future remnant liver (FRL) modulation (dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI: 5; ALPPS: 5). All five dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI cases responded well, with patients #4 and #5 achieving complete tumor necrosis. The overall response rate (ORR) was 5/5. Patients #1-4 underwent hepatectomy, while #5 declined surgery due to complete tumor necrosis. Mean FRL volume increased by 75.3% (range 60.0%-89.4%) in 2-4 months, compared to 104.6% (range 51.3%-160.8%) in 21-37 days for ALPPS (P = 0.032). Major postoperative complications occurred in 1/5 ALPPS patients. Resection rates were 4/4 for quadruple therapy and 5/5 for ALPPS. 2-year progression free survival for dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI and ALPPS were 5/5 and 3/5, respectively.Quadruple therapy is a feasible, effective strategy for enhancing resectability by downsizing tumors and inducing FRL hypertrophy, with manageable complications and improved long-term prognosis. In addition, it provokes the re-examination of the application of ALPPS in an era of molecular and immune treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    联合肝分区和门静脉结扎进行分期肝切除术(ALPPS)是一种新颖的方法,用于未来肝残存量不足(FLR)的患者进行大切除。有效的FLR增强是完成ALPPS的关键。与慢性病毒性肝炎相关的肝纤维化/肝硬化损害肝再生。探讨FLR在纤维化/肝硬化肝(FL)和非纤维化肝(NFL)患者ALPPS相关性中的增强作用,并比较其短期临床结局和长期生存率。根据Ishak改良分期将患者分为两组:非纤维化肝组(NFL,0期)和纤维化/肝硬化肝组(FL,阶段1-5/6)。每周肝脏再生在FLR,围手术期数据,和生存结局进行了调查。27例肝肿瘤患者接受了ALPPS(NFL,n=7;FL,n=20)。NFL和FL患者有病毒性肝炎(28.6%[n=2]和95%[n=19]),绝对FLR体积增量为134.90ml和161.85ml(p=0.825),肥厚率分别为16.46毫升/天和13.66毫升/天(p=0.507),分别。在FL组中,基线FLR体积为360.13ml,术后第2周上升至平台期(542.30ml),第3周下降(378.45ml)。1例肝硬化(6期)患者(3.7%)未能进行ALPPS-II。总体ALPPS相关的主要并发症发生率为7.4%。ALPPS适用于Ishak改良分期≤5的纤维化肝脏患者。ALPPS-I之后,在这些患者中,14天的FLR增强似乎是达到最大FLR量的适当等待时间。
    Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a novel procedure for major resection in patients with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Effective FLR augmentation is pivotal in the completion of ALPPS. Liver fibrosis/cirrhosis associated with chronic viral hepatitis impairs liver regeneration. To investigate the augmentation of FLR in associating ALPPS between patients with fibrotic/cirrhotic livers (FL) and non-fibrotic livers (NFL) and compare their short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival. Patients were divided into two groups based on the Ishak modified staging: non-fibrotic liver group (NFL, stage 0) and fibrotic/cirrhotic liver group (FL, stage 1-5/6). Weekly liver regeneration in FLR, perioperative data, and survival outcomes were investigated. Twenty-seven patients with liver tumors underwent ALPPS (NFL, n = 7; FL, n = 20). NFL and FL patients had viral hepatitis (28.6% [n = 2] and 95% [n = 19]), absolute FLR volume increments of 134.90 ml and 161.85 ml (p = 0.825), and rates of hypertrophy were 16.46 ml/day and 13.66 ml/day (p = 0.507), respectively. In the FL group, baseline FLR volume was 360.13 ml, postoperatively it increased to a plateau (542.30 ml) in week 2 and declined (378.45 ml) in week 3. One patient (3.7%) with cirrhotic liver (stage 6) failed to proceed to ALPPS-II. The overall ALPPS-related major complication rate was 7.4%. ALPPS is feasible for fibrotic liver patients classified by Ishak modified stages ≤ 5. After ALPPS-I, 14 days for FLR augmentation seems an appropriate waiting time to reach a maximum FLR volume in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号