survival outcome

生存结果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    卵巢癌是一种晚期的疾病,由于没有任何具体或明显的症状。护理标准是初级减瘤手术,其次是化疗。卵巢癌复发治疗非常具有挑战性,并且在细胞减灭术与化疗之间始终存在争议。
    检索了2011年1月至2019年12月期间所有因复发性卵巢癌而接受二次细胞减灭术的患者的电子病历,包括在此期间在我科接受二次细胞减灭术的铂敏感性复发性卵巢癌患者。
    在研究期间,共有52名患者接受了复发性卵巢癌的二次细胞减灭术。初级治疗后的中位无治疗间隔为20个月(范围6-132)。4例(8%)患者的二次细胞减灭术非常复杂,19(37%)有中等手术复杂性评分,根据Aletti复杂性评分,29(55%)的手术复杂性评分较低。31(60%)的二次细胞减灭术已完成(无肉眼可见的残留疾病);17(33%)的患者为最佳(R1),仅4(7%)的患者为次优。在52名患者中,8过期,16有第二次复发,随着时间的推移,10人失去了随访。
    在精心挑选的患者中,成功的手术是可能的,这反过来可以导致有意义的无进展和总体生存获益。病例的细致个性化应牢记患者的表现状态,既往治疗史和毒性;疾病的分布和程度,以及患者的整体生活目标。
    UNASSIGNED: Ovarian cancer is a disease that presents in advanced stage, due to the absence of any specific or overtly dramatic symptoms. The standard of care is primary debulking surgery, followed by chemotherapy. Ovarian cancer recurrence treatment is very challenging and there is always a debate between cytoreduction vs chemotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: The electronic medical records of all patients who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer between January 2011 and December 2019 were retrieved the patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery in our department during this time period were included.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 52 patients underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer during the study period. Median treatment free interval after primary treatment was 20 months (range 6-132). The secondary cytoreductive surgery was highly complex in 4(8 %) patients,19 (37 %) had intermediate surgical complexity score, 29 (55 %) had low surgical complexity score according to the Aletti complexity score. Secondary cytoreductive surgery was complete (no macroscopic residual disease) in 31(60 %); Optimal (R1) in 17 (33 %) and suboptimal in only 4 (7 %) of the patients. Out of the 52 patients,8 expired, 16 had a second recurrence, and 10 were lost to follow up over time.
    UNASSIGNED: Successful surgery is possible in well selected patients, which in turn can lead to a meaningful progression free and overall survival benefit. Meticulous individualisation of cases should be done keeping in mind the patient\'s performance status, prior treatment history & toxicity; distribution & extent of disease, and the patient\'s overall life goals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)具有直接的细胞毒性和移植物抗多发性骨髓瘤作用(GvMM)。越来越多的试验表明,在新诊断和复发MM中进行alloHCT的生存益处。
    我们旨在提供近10年的全面分析,以验证alloHCT在MM患者中的疗效和生存结果。我们的研究包括了总共61项研究,这些研究提供了2013年4月14日至2023年4月14日之间的数据,以及总共15,294例接受过alloSCT的MM患者的数据。最佳反应率(CR,VGPR,PR)和生存结果(1-,2-,3-,5-,和10年操作系统,PFS,NRM)进行了评估。我们进一步独立地在NDMM/前线设置和RRMM/救助设置中进行了荟萃分析。
    合并估计CR,VGPR,PR率分别为0.45、0.21和0.24。1-的汇总估计,2-,3-,5-,和10年OS分别为0.69、0.57、0.45、0.45和0.36;1-,2-,3-,5-,和10年PFS分别为0.47、0.35、0.24、0.25和0.28;1-,2-,3-,5-,10年期NRM分别为0.16、0.21、0.16、0.20和0.15。在NDMM/前期设置中,汇总估计的CR率为0.54,而5年OS的CR率为0.54,PFS,和NRM分别为0.69、0.40和0.11。在复发的环境中,汇总估计的CR率为0.31,而5年OS的CR率为0.31,PFS,和NRM分别为0.24、0.10和0.15。
    我们的结果显示操作系统不变,PFS,和NRM从第三年开始到第十年,这表明alloSCT具有持续生存益处。在NDMM/前线设置中观察到良好的反应率和有希望的生存结果。
    尽管与其他治疗方法相比,alloSCT的缓解率较低,短期生存结局较差,长期随访可以揭示alloSCT对MM患者的生存益处。
    UNASSIGNED: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) possessed direct cytotoxicity and graft-versus-multiple myeloma effect (GvMM). Growing trials have shown survival benefits of performing alloHCT in both newly diagnosed and relapsed MM.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis in the recent 10 years to verify the efficacy and survival outcome of alloHCT in MM patients. A total of 61 studies which provide data between 14/04/2013 and 14/04/2023 and a total of 15,294 data from MM patients who had undergone alloSCT were included in our study. The best response rates (CR, VGPR, PR) and survival outcomes (1-, 2-, 3-,5-, and 10-year OS, PFS, NRM) were assessed. We further conducted meta-analysis in the NDMM/frontline setting and RRMM/salvage setting independently.
    UNASSIGNED: The pooled estimate CR, VGPR, and PR rates were 0.45, 0.21, and 0.24, respectively. The pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 0.69, 0.57, 0.45, 0.45, and 0.36, respectively; the pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS were 0.47, 0.35, 0.24, 0.25, and 0.28, respectively; and the pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year NRM were 0.16, 0.21, 0.16, 0.20, and 0.15, respectively. In the NDMM/upfront setting, the pooled estimate CR rate was 0.54, and those for 5-year OS, PFS, and NRM were 0.69, 0.40, and 0.11, respectively. In a relapsed setting, the pooled estimate CR rate was 0.31, and those for 5-year OS, PFS, and NRM were 0.24, 0.10, and 0.15, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results showed constant OS, PFS, and NRM from the third year onwards till the 10th year, suggesting that alloSCT has sustained survival benefits. Good response rate and promising survival outcome were observed in the NDMM/ frontline setting.
    UNASSIGNED: Although comparing with other treatments, alloSCT had a lower response rate and poorer short-term survival outcome, long-term follow-up could reveal survival benefits of alloSCT in MM patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们最近发布了关于醋酸阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺在一线环境中对化疗初治去势耐药前列腺癌(CRPC)的生存结果差异的多机构现实分析。尽管该分析中包括了减少剂量的诱导病例,诱导剂量减少可能与疗效降低相关。在这项研究中,我们分析了整个队列中的全剂量诱导亚组,并研究了这些药物之间疗效的真实差异.方法对220例一线雄激素受体信号抑制剂(ARSI)全剂量诱导化疗初治CRPC患者进行分析。结果指标是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应,PSA无进展生存期(PSA-PFS),无治疗失败生存期(TFF),癌症特异性生存率(CSS),总生存率(OS)。结果58和162例患者均给予醋酸阿比特龙和恩扎鲁他胺,分别。PSA缓解率中位数(-65.4%(A)和-81.5%(E),p=0.0252),PSA下降≥90%(22.4%(A)和37.0%(E),p=0.0478),PSA-PFS(中位数为4个月(A)和7个月(E),p=0.00833),TFF(中位数6个月(A)和15个月(E),p<0.0001),CSS(中位数为45个月(A),未达到(E),p<0.0001),和OS(中位数34个月(A)和80个月(E),p<0.001)在E组明显更好。结论本研究显示PSA反应,PSA-PFS,TTF,CSS,一线恩杂鲁胺给药的OS更好。在全剂量诱导队列中,恩杂鲁胺直接抑制雄激素受体信号与更好的临床结果相关。
    Purpose We recently released the multi-institutional real-world analysis about the difference in survival outcomes between abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide against chemo-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in a first-line setting. Although reduced dose induction cases were included in that analysis, induction dose reduction might correlate with reduced efficacy. In this study, we analyzed full-dose induction subgroups from our overall cohort and investigated the true difference in efficacy between these agents. Methods A total of 220 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC cases treated with full-dose induction of first-line androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) were analyzed. Outcome measures were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), treatment failure-free survival (TFF), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide were administered to 58 and 162 patients, respectively. The median PSA response rate (-65.4% (A) and -81.5% (E), p = 0.0252), PSA decline ≥ 90% (22.4% (A) and 37.0% (E), p = 0.0478), PSA-PFS (median four months (A) and seven months (E), p = 0.00833), TFF (median six months (A) and 15 months (E), p<0.0001), CSS (median 45 months (A) and not reached (E), p < 0.0001), and OS (median 34 months (A) and 80 months (E), p<0.001) were significantly better in the E group. Conclusion This study showed that PSA response, PSA-PFS, TTF, CSS, and OS were better with first-line enzalutamide administration. Direct inhibition of androgen receptor signaling by enzalutamide is associated with better clinical outcomes in the full-dose induction cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:立体定向消融体放疗(SABR)越来越多地用于早期肺癌,然而,剂量对心脏和心脏亚结构的影响在很大程度上仍然未知.该研究调查了SABR患者心脏亚结构接受的剂量及其对生存的影响。
    方法:SSBROC是一项澳大利亚多中心II期SABR治疗I期非小细胞肺癌的前瞻性研究。患者在2013年至2019年期间在9个中心接受治疗。在对数据集的二次分析中,我们在117例试验患者的计划CT上部署了之前发布的本地开发的开源混合深度学习心脏子结构自动分割工具.计算18个心脏结构的物理剂量和EQD2转换剂量(α/β=3)。评估的终点包括心包积液和总生存率。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox比例风险模型分析了心脏剂量与生存率之间的关联。
    结果:接受最高物理平均剂量的心脏结构是上腔静脉(22.5Gy)和窦房结(18.3Gy)。心脏(51.7Gy)和右心房(45.3Gy)接受了最高的物理最大剂量。3例患者发展为2级,1例发展为3级心包积液。与接受低于中位数MHD的人群相比,接受高于中位数平均心脏剂量(MHD)的人群的生存率较差(p=0.00004)。关于多变量Cox分析,男性和升主动脉的最大剂量对较差的生存率有显著影响.
    结论:接受肺SABR治疗的患者可以接受高剂量的心脏亚结构治疗。根据中位平均心脏剂量对患者进行二分显示出明显的生存率差异。在多变量分析中,性别和升主动脉剂量对生存有重要意义,然而,心脏亚结构剂量学和结局应在更大的研究中进一步探讨.
    OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly used for early-stage lung cancer, however the impact of dose to the heart and cardiac substructures remains largely unknown. The study investigated doses received by cardiac substructures in SABR patients and impact on survival.
    METHODS: SSBROC is an Australian multi-centre phase II prospective study of SABR for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Patients were treated between 2013 and 2019 across 9 centres. In this secondary analysis of the dataset, a previously published and locally developed open-source hybrid deep learning cardiac substructure automatic segmentation tool was deployed on the planning CTs of 117 trial patients. Physical doses to 18 cardiac structures and EQD2 converted doses (α/β = 3) were calculated. Endpoints evaluated include pericardial effusion and overall survival. Associations between cardiac doses and survival were analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.
    RESULTS: Cardiac structures that received the highest physical mean doses were superior vena cava (22.5 Gy) and sinoatrial node (18.3 Gy). The highest physical maximum dose was received by the heart (51.7 Gy) and right atrium (45.3 Gy). Three patients developed grade 2, and one grade 3 pericardial effusion. The cohort receiving higher than median mean heart dose (MHD) had poorer survival compared to those who received below median MHD (p = 0.00004). On multivariable Cox analysis, male gender and maximum dose to ascending aorta were significant for worse survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with lung SABR may receive high doses to cardiac substructures. Dichotomising the patients according to median mean heart dose showed a clear difference in survival. On multivariable analyses gender and dose to ascending aorta were significant for survival, however cardiac substructure dosimetry and outcomes should be further explored in larger studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于没有突变驱动基因的未分化甲状腺癌(ATC)患者,化疗被认为是一线治疗选择.然而,化疗治疗ATC的益处有限.在这个分析中,我们收集了自2010年以来报告的前瞻性数据,以全面分析ATC中新兴的基于化疗的治疗方法.
    对于此更新的分析,我们搜索了PubMed(MEDLINE),WebofScience,Embase,2010年1月1日至2024年2月7日的CochraneCENTRAL数据库,用于包含基于化疗的治疗的前瞻性临床研究.这项分析是为了汇集总生存率(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCRs),和3级或更严重的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。
    纳入了对232名患者的6项前瞻性临床试验。化疗常联合靶向治疗或放疗。合并的中位OS为6.0个月(95%CI4.1-9.7),接受化疗策略的ATC患者的中位PFS为3.2个月(95%CI1.9-6.0).综合ORR和DCR分别为21%(95%CI15%-27%)和64%(95%CI55%-72%),分别。关于三年级或更糟糕的TRAE,合并发生率为68%(95%CI47%-86%).
    尽管新兴的基于化疗的治疗在ATC患者中显示出抗肿瘤活性,这些策略未能显著延长生存时间.更实用,安全,ATC患者的新治疗方案需要进一步研究。
    UNASSIGNED: For patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) without mutational driver genes, chemotherapy is suggested to be the first-line treatment option. However, the benefits of chemotherapy in treating ATC are limited. In this analysis, we collected the prospective data reported since 2010 to analyze the emerging chemotherapy-based treatments in ATC comprehensively.
    UNASSIGNED: For this updated analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from 1 January 2010 to 7 February 2024 for prospective clinical studies that contained chemotherapy-based treatments. This analysis was done to pool overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), and grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
    UNASSIGNED: Six prospective clinical trials with 232 patients were included. Chemotherapy was commonly combined with targeted therapy or radiotherapy. The pooled median OS was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.1-9.7), and the median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.9-6.0) in patients with ATC who received chemotherapy-based strategies. The integrated ORR and DCR were 21% (95% CI 15%-27%) and 64% (95% CI 55%-72%), respectively. Regarding the grade 3 or worse TRAE, the pooled incidence was 68% (95% CI 47%-86%).
    UNASSIGNED: Although the emerging chemotherapy-based treatments showed antitumor activity in patients with ATC, these strategies failed to prolong the survival time substantially. More practical, safe, and novel therapeutic regimens for patients with ATC warrant further investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管多西他赛和ARSI在前列腺癌的临床指南中被认为是对抗化疗初治转移性CRPC的治疗选择,没有明确的证据表明哪种药物应该作为一线治疗。因此,我们调查了使用多西他赛或ARSI作为一线药物治疗的CRPC队列,以解决这些临床问题.
    方法:本研究纳入了在2006年3月至2017年4月期间在Jikei大学医院及其附属机构接受一线多西他赛或ARSI(阿比特龙或恩扎鲁他胺)治疗的345例化疗初治CRPC患者。倾向评分匹配方法用于最小化患者的背景。结果测量为PSA反应率,PSA下降≥90%,癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)。
    结果:PSA下降与OS和CSS相关(分别为p=0.027,<0.001),多西他赛组中位PSA下降率为60.4%,ARSI组为85.7%(p=0.0311)。多西他赛组的中位OS为33m(95CI:27-53),ARSI组为61m(95CI:47-NA)(p=0.0246)。在倾向评分匹配队列中,多西他赛组的CSS中位数为34m(95CI:27-53),ARSI组的NR(未达到)(95CI:61-NA)(p=0.000133)。在多变量分析中,ARSI诱导首先显示OS和CSS的显著更好(分别为p=0.0033和<0.001)。
    结论:在这项研究中,ARSI诱导的生存结局优于多西他赛对抗化疗初治CRPC。在这项研究中找不到首先通过诱导多西他赛获得生存益处的候选人。
    OBJECTIVE: Although docetaxel and ARSI are picked up as treatment options against chemo-naïve metastatic CRPC in clinical guidelines for prostate cancer, there is no clear evidence which agent should be introduced as first line treatment. Therefore, we investigated our CRPC cohort treated with docetaxel or ARSI as first-line agent against chemo-naïve CRPC to solve these clinical questions.
    METHODS: A total of 345 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC patients introduced to first-line docetaxel or ARSI (abiraterone or enzalutamide) between March 2006 and April 2017 at Jikei University Hospital and its affiliated institutions were included in this study. Propensity score matching method was used to minimize the patients\' background. The outcome measures were PSA response rate, PSA decline ≥ 90%, cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: PSA decline correlated OS and CSS (p = 0.027, < 0.001, respectively) and median PSA decline rate was 60.4% in docetaxel group and 85.7% in ARSI group (p = 0.0311). Median OS was 33 m (95%CI: 27-53) in docetaxel group and 61 m (95%CI: 47-NA) in ARSI group (p = 0.0246). Median CSS was 34 m (95%CI: 27-53) in docetaxel group and NR (not reached) (95%CI: 61-NA) in ARSI group (p = 0.000133) in propensity score matching cohort. In multivariate analysis, ARSI induction first showed significantly better for OS and CSS (p = 0.0033 and < 0.001, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, better survival outcome with ARSI induction first than docetaxel against chemo-naïve CRPC. And the candidates who had survival benefit by induction docetaxel first could not be found in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:动态对比增强(DCE)MRI中骨肉瘤的灌注减少,反映了对新辅助化疗的良好组织学反应,已被描述。
    目的:在本研究中,我们旨在探讨相对洗入率作为无事件生存期(EFS)预后因素的可能性.
    方法:骨骼高级别骨肉瘤患者,在2005年至2022年期间在两个三级转诊中心接受治疗的患者被回顾性纳入.之前用DCE-MRI确定相对洗入率(rWIR),之后,或在化疗的第二个周期(切除前)。先前确定的截止值用于对患者进行分类,其中rWIR<2.3被认为是差的,rWIR≥2.3是良好的放射学响应。EFS定义为从切除到第一次事件的时间:局部复发,新的转移瘤,或肿瘤相关死亡。EFS是使用Kaplan-Meier的方法进行估计的。多变量Cox比例风险模型用于估计组织学反应和rWIR对EFS的影响,对传统的预后因素进行了调整。
    结果:纳入82例患者(中位年龄:17岁;IQR:14-28)。中位随访时间为11.8年(95%CI:11.0-12.7)。随访期间,发生了33个事件不良的组织学反应与EFS没有显着相关(HR:1.8;95%CI:0.9-3.8),而放射学应答差与EFS差相关(HR:2.4;95%CI:1.1-5.0).在没有初始转移的亚群中,rWIR的二元评估接近统计学意义(HR:2.3;95%CI:1.0-5.2),而其持续评估表明rWIR较高与EFS改善之间存在显著关联(HR:0.7;95%CI:0.5-0.9),强调化疗反应的效果。rWIR≥2.3患者的2年和5年EFS分别为85%和75%,rWIR<2.3患者为55%和50%。
    结论:预测的MRI不良化疗反应(rWIR<2.3)与较短的EFS相关,即使对已知的临床协变量进行了调整,并且显示出与组织学反应评估相似的结果。rWIR是骨肉瘤患者手术切除前未来基于反应的个体化医疗的潜在工具。
    BACKGROUND: The decreased perfusion of osteosarcoma in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, reflecting a good histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, has been described.
    OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to explore the potential of the relative wash-in rate as a prognostic factor for event-free survival (EFS).
    METHODS: Skeletal high-grade osteosarcoma patients, treated in two tertiary referral centers between 2005 and 2022, were retrospectively included. The relative wash-in rate (rWIR) was determined with DCE-MRI before, after, or during the second cycle of chemotherapy (pre-resection). A previously determined cut-off was used to categorize patients, where rWIR < 2.3 was considered poor and rWIR ≥ 2.3 a good radiological response. EFS was defined as the time from resection to the first event: local recurrence, new metastases, or tumor-related death. EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier\'s methodology. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the effect of histological response and rWIR on EFS, adjusted for traditional prognostic factors.
    RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (median age: 17 years; IQR: 14-28) were included. The median follow-up duration was 11.8 years (95% CI: 11.0-12.7). During follow-up, 33 events occurred. Poor histological response was not significantly associated with EFS (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 0.9-3.8), whereas a poor radiological response was associated with a worse EFS (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.0). In a subpopulation without initial metastases, the binary assessment of rWIR approached statistical significance (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.0-5.2), whereas its continuous evaluation demonstrated a significant association between higher rWIR and improved EFS (HR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9), underlining the effect of response to chemotherapy. The 2- and 5-year EFS for patients with a rWIR ≥ 2.3 were 85% and 75% versus 55% and 50% for patients with a rWIR < 2.3.
    CONCLUSIONS: The predicted poor chemo response with MRI (rWIR < 2.3) is associated with shorter EFS even when adjusted for known clinical covariates and shows similar results to histological response evaluation. rWIR is a potential tool for future response-based individualized healthcare in osteosarcoma patients before surgical resection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:急性胰腺炎(AP)是胰腺的一种炎症性疾病,严重AP(SAP)预后较差。该研究旨在确定有希望的生物标志物,以预测SAP患者的发生和生存结果。
    方法:回顾性招募240例AP患者,其中72例患有SAP。进行血液检查以收集实验室指标。治疗后,记录患者的死亡率.
    结果:SAP组患者的重症监护病房入院率较高,住院时间较长(p<.001)。在实验室参数中,显著高值的C反应蛋白(CRP),甘油三酯和葡萄糖(TyG)指数,相对于非SAP组,SAP组中发现了血管性血友病因子抗原(vWF:Ag)和D-二聚体。接收机工作特性曲线表明CRP性能良好,TyG指数,vWF:Ag和D-二聚体在SAP诊断中的应用。在所有SAP案例中,51人幸存,21人死亡。TyG指数(比值比[OR]=6.914,95%置信区间[CI]=1.193-40.068,p=0.028),vWF:Ag(OR=7.441,95%CI=1.236-244.815,p=0.028),D-二聚体(OR=7.987,95%CI=1.251~50.997,p=0.028)与SAP患者生存结局显著相关。TyG指数和vWF在预测总体预后方面均显示出良好的效率。多变量模型的曲线下面积(PRE=-35.9082.764×TyG0.021×vWF:Ag)为0.909,大于0.9,表明其在预后预测中的出色表现。
    结论:CRP,TyG指数,vWF:Ag,入院时的D-二聚体值可能是SAP发展的潜在临床预测因子。此外,TyG指数和vWF:Ag可能有助于预测生存结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas, and the prognosis of severe AP (SAP) is poor. The study aimed to identify promising biomarkers for predicting the occurrence and survival outcome of SAP patients.
    METHODS: Two hundred and forty AP patients were retrospectively recruited, in which 72 cases with SAP. Blood test was done for collection of laboratory indicators. After treatment, the mortality of patients was recorded.
    RESULTS: Patients in the SAP group had higher intensive care unit admissions and longer hospital stays (p < .001). Among laboratory parameters, significantly high values of C-reactive protein (CRP), triglycerides and glucose (TyG) index, Von willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag) and D-dimer were found in SAP groups relative to non-SAP ones. Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated the good performance of CRP, TyG index, vWF:Ag and D-dimer in SAP diagnosis. Among all SAP cases, 51 survived while 21 died. TyG index (odds ratio [OR] = 6.914, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.193-40.068, p = .028), vWF:Ag (OR = 7.441, 95% CI = 1.236-244.815, p = .028), and D-dimer (OR = 7.987, 95% CI = 1.251-50.997, p = .028) were significantly related to survival outcome of SAP patients by multiple logistic regression analysis. Both TyG index and vWF showed favorable efficiency in predicting overall prognosis. The area under the curve for the multivariate model (PRE = -35.908 + 2.764 × TyG + 0.021 × vWF:Ag) was 0.909 which was greater than 0.9, indicating its excellent performance in prognosis prediction.
    CONCLUSIONS: CRP, TyG index, vWF:Ag, and D-dimer values on admission may be potential clinical predictors of the development of SAP. Moreover, TyG index and vWF:Ag may be helpful to predict survival outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:手术对25-羟基维生素D(25-(OH)D)水平有显著影响。围手术期25(OH)D缺乏对结直肠癌(CRC)患者预后的影响仍存在不确定性。本研究的目的是探讨围手术期25(OH)D缺乏与CRC生存结局之间的潜在关联。
    方法:七个电子数据库[包括PubMed,EMBASE,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,OvidMEDLINE(R),中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)和王方数据]进行了无语言限制的搜索。主要结果是总生存率和全因死亡率。次要结果是围手术期25(OH)D缺乏的发生率和低25(OH)D水平的风险变量。
    结果:获得了14项符合条件的研究,9324例患者用于荟萃分析。在围手术期,血25(OH)D缺乏的合并发生率为59.61%(95%CI:45.74-73.48).术后血25(OH)D缺乏的发生率(66.60%)高于术前(52.65%,95%CI:32.94-72.36)。男性(RR=1.09,95%CI:1.03-1.16),直肠肿瘤(RR=1.23,95%CI:1.03-1.47),春季和冬季采样(RR=1.24,95%CI:1.02-1.49)是25(OH)D缺乏的危险因素。术后低25(OH)D与短期总生存率(HR=0.43,95%CI:0.24-0.77)之间的关联最为显著,而术前低25(OH)D(HR=0.47,95%CI:0.31-0.70)与长期全因死亡率的相关性比手术后更显著.
    结论:围手术期25(OH)D影响CRC患者的预后。由于全身炎症反应(SIR)的可能混淆作用,同时测定维生素D和SIR对结直肠存活至关重要.
    OBJECTIVE: Surgery had a significant impact on 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D) levels. Uncertainty still existed regarding the effects of peri-operative 25(OH)D deficiency on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients\' prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to explore the potential association between the peri-operative 25(OH)D deficiency and the survival outcome of CRC.
    METHODS: Seven electronic databases [including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, OvidMEDLINE(R), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wangfang data] were searched without language limitations. The primary outcomes were overall survival and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of 25(OH)D deficiency and risk variables for low 25(OH)D level in the peri-operative period.
    RESULTS: 14 eligible studies were obtained with 9324 patients for meta-analysis. In the peri-operative period, the pooled incidence of blood 25(OH)D deficiency was 59.61% (95% CI: 45.74-73.48). The incidence of blood 25(OH)D deficiency post-operatively (66.60%) was higher than that pre-operatively (52.65%, 95% CI: 32.94-72.36). Male (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.16), rectum tumor (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.47), spring and winter sampling (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) were the risk factors for the 25(OH)D deficiency. The association between the low 25(OH)D post-operatively and short-term overall survival (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.77) was most prominent, while a low 25(OH)D pre-operatively (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.70) was more significantly associated with long-term all-cause mortality than that after surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Peri-operative 25(OH)D impacted the CRC patients\' prognosis. Due to possible confounding effects of systemic inflammatory response (SIR), simultaneous measurement of vitamin D and SIR is essential for colorectal survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有证据表明二甲双胍使用者患皮肤癌的风险有一定程度的降低。然而,没有研究进一步研究二甲双胍对黑色素瘤生存和安全性结局的影响.本研究旨在定量总结二甲双胍对黑色素瘤患者总生存期(OS)和免疫相关不良反应(irAEs)的影响。
    选择标准:纳入标准是根据PICOS原则设计的。信息来源:PubMed,EMBASE,科克伦图书馆,从这些数据库开始到2023年11月,使用“黑色素瘤”和“二甲双胍”作为关键词,搜索了WebofScience发布的相关文献。生存结果是OS,无进展生存期(PFS),无复发生存率(RFS),和死亡率;安全性结果是错误的。偏倚风险和数据综合:选择用于评估随机试验2中偏倚风险的Cochrane工具(RoB2)和非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)来评估偏倚风险。使用基于Stata15.1SE的CochraneQ和I2统计数据来检验所有研究之间的异质性。漏斗图,Egger回归,和Begg检验用于评估发表偏倚。选择留一法作为灵敏度分析工具。
    共纳入12项研究,涉及111036例黑色素瘤患者。OS的合并HR为0.64(95%CI[0.42,1.00],p=0.004,I2=73.7%),PFS的HR为0.89(95%CI[0.70,1.12],p=0.163,I2=41.4%),RFS的HR为0.62(95%CI[0.26,1.48],p=0.085,I2=66.3%),死亡率为0.53(95%CI[0.46,0.63],p=0.775,I2=0.0%)。二甲双胍组和无二甲双胍组之间的irAE发生率无显著差异(OR=1.01;95%CI[0.42,2.41];p=0.642)。
    使用二甲双胍的黑色素瘤患者的总生存期的改善可能是由于其不同的生物学靶标和对多种全身性疾病的有益作用间接导致的。虽然我们无法证明黑色素瘤患者的生存率有特定的改善,二甲双胍对服用该药物患者的综合益处和安全性值得肯定。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42024518182。
    UNASSIGNED: There is evidence of a modest reduction in skin cancer risk among metformin users. However, no studies have further examined the effects of metformin on melanoma survival and safety outcomes. This study aimed to quantitatively summarize any influence of metformin on the overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in melanoma patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Selection criteria: The inclusion criteria were designed based on the PICOS principles. Information sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published from the inception of these databases until November 2023 using \'Melanoma\' and \'Metformin\' as keywords. Survival outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and mortality; the safety outcome was irAEs. Risk of bias and data Synthesis: The Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trial 2 (RoB2) and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were selected to assess the risk of bias. The Cochrane Q and I 2 statistics based on Stata 15.1 SE were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Funnel plot, Egger regression, and Begg tests were used to evaluate publication bias. The leave-one-out method was selected as the sensitivity analysis tool.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 studies were included, involving 111,036 melanoma patients. The pooled HR for OS was 0.64 (95% CI [0.42, 1.00], p = 0.004, I2 = 73.7%), HR for PFS was 0.89 (95% CI [0.70, 1.12], p = 0.163, I2 = 41.4%), HR for RFS was 0.62 (95% CI [0.26, 1.48], p = 0.085, I2 = 66.3%), and HR for mortality was 0.53 (95% CI [0.46, 0.63], p = 0.775, I2 = 0.0%). There was no significant difference in irAEs incidence (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.42, 2.41]; p = 0.642) between metformin and no metformin groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The improvement in overall survival of melanoma patients with metformin may indirectly result from its diverse biological targets and beneficial effects on multiple systemic diseases. While we could not demonstrate a specific improvement in the survival of melanoma patients, the combined benefits and safety of metformin for patients taking the drug are worthy of recognition.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024518182.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号