Small-cell lung cancer

小细胞肺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。然而,SCLC化疗后肿瘤收缩率(TSR)的预后价值尚不清楚.
    方法:我们对235例SCLC患者进行了回顾性分析。基于接收器工作特性曲线分析确定TSR截止值。使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型评估TSR与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的相关性。通过Kaplan-Meier方法获得存活曲线,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。一线治疗后的复发模式总结在饼图中。构建列线图以验证TSR在SCLC中的预测作用。
    结果:确定TSR截止值为-6.6%。TSR<-6.6%的组的中位PFS和OS长于TSR≥-6.6%的组。当TSR<-6.6%时,广泛性SCLC患者的PFS和OS也比其>-6.6%时更长。TSR<-6.6%的组无脑转移生存率更好。TSR与PFS呈显著正相关。此外,单因素和多元回归分析表明,TSR,患者年龄,和既往放疗是OS的独立预后因素,而TSR和M分期是PFS的独立预后因素。
    结论:TSR可能是SCLC一线化疗患者OS和PFS的良好指标。
    BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death. However, the prognostic value of the tumor shrinkage rate (TSR) after chemotherapy for SCLC is still unknown.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 235 patients with SCLC. The TSR cutoff was determined based on receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. The associations of TSR with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Survival curves were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Recurrence patterns after first-line treatment were summarized in a pie chart. A nomogram was constructed to validate the predictive role of the TSR in SCLC.
    RESULTS: The TSR cutoff was identified to be  - 6.6%. Median PFS and OS were longer in the group with a TSR < -6.6% than in the group with a TSR ≥ - 6.6%. PFS and OS were also longer in patients with extensive SCLC when the TSR was < - 6.6% than when it was > - 6.6%. Brain metastasis-free survival was better in the group with a TSR < - 6.6%. There was a significant positive correlation between TSR and PFS. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that the TSR, patient age, and previous radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS while TSR and M stage were independent prognostic factors for PFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: The TSR may prove to be a good indicator of OS and PFS in patients receiving chemotherapy-based first-line treatment for SCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是最具侵袭性和致死性的肺癌类型,以有限的治疗选择为特征,早期和频繁转移。然而,SCLC转移的决定因素定义不清.这里,我们显示雌激素相关受体γ(ERRγ)在转移性SCLC肿瘤中过度表达,与SCLC进展呈正相关。ERRγ作为细胞外基质(ECM)重塑和细胞粘附的必需激活剂,转移的两个关键步骤,通过直接调节参与这些过程的主要基因的表达。ERRγ的遗传和药理抑制显着减少胶原蛋白的产生,细胞-基质粘附,微丝生产,并最终阻断SCLC细胞侵袭和肿瘤转移。值得注意的是,ERRγ拮抗剂在多种细胞来源和患者来源的异种移植模型中显著抑制肿瘤生长和转移并恢复SCLC对化疗的脆弱性。一起来看,这些发现将ERRγ确立为转移性SCLC的一个有吸引力的靶点,并为治疗这种致死性疾病提供了潜在的药理学策略.
    Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive and lethal type of lung cancer, characterized by limited treatment options, early and frequent metastasis. However, the determinants of metastasis in SCLC are poorly defined. Here, we show that estrogen-related receptor gamma (ERRγ) is overexpressed in metastatic SCLC tumors, and is positively associated with SCLC progression. ERRγ functions as an essential activator of extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling and cell adhesion, two critical steps in metastasis, by directly regulating the expression of major genes involved in these processes. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of ERRγ markedly reduces collagen production, cell-matrix adhesion, microfilament production, and eventually blocks SCLC cell invasion and tumor metastasis. Notably, ERRγ antagonists significantly suppressed tumor growth and metastasis and restored SCLC vulnerability to chemotherapy in multiple cell-derived and patient-derived xenograft models. Taken together, these findings establish ERRγ as an attractive target for metastatic SCLC and provide a potential pharmacological strategy for treating this lethal disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:程序性细胞死亡1(PD-1)/程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂与化疗联合治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的安全性仍未完全阐明。
    方法:我们对PubMed进行了全面的搜索,Embase,和Cochrane数据库,用于研究在标准研究者选择化疗中添加PD-1或PD-L1抑制剂的随机对照试验。我们对所有终点使用了95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)。
    结果:纳入了6项研究和2,995名患者。在基线,患者的中位年龄从62岁到65岁不等,311(10.4%)有脑转移,1,060(35.4%)有肝转移。发现PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂可降低致命毒性相关的死亡率(RR:0.85;95%CI:0.80-0.91;p<0.001;I2=49%)。干预组食欲下降的发生率较高(RR:1.19;95%CI:1.02-1.40;p=0.03;I2=0%),低钠血症(RR:1.51;95%CI:1.08-2.12;p=0.02;I2=0%),和甲状腺功能减退(RR:3.14;95%CI:1.10-8.95;p=0.03;I2=81%)。关于3-4级不良事件,添加PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与任何评估结果的发生率增加没有关联。
    结论:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,在化疗中加入PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂证明了良好的安全性,并且是重塑广泛期小细胞肺癌患者既定治疗模式的有希望的前景.
    OBJECTIVE: The safety profile of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors when associated with chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer is still not fully unraveled.
    METHODS: We performed a comprehensive searrch of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated the addition of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors to standard investigator choice chemotherapy. We used risk -ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all endpoints.
    RESULTS: Six studies and 2,995 patients were included. At the baseline, the median age of the patients varied from 62 to 65 years, 311 (10.4%) had brain metastases, and 1,060 (35.4%) had liver metastases. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were found to reduce fatal toxicities-related mortality (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80-0.91; p < 0.001; I2 = 49%). The intervention group had a higher incidence of decreased appetite (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.40; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%), hyponatremia (RR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.08-2.12; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%), and hypothyroidism (RR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.10-8.95; p = 0.03; I2 = 81%) of any grade. Regarding adverse events of grade 3-4, there was no association of the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with an increased occurrence of any of the evaluated outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the incorporation of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy demonstrated an excellent safety profile and to be a promising prospect for reshaping the established treatment paradigms for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    小细胞肺癌(SCLC)仍然是一种预后不良的疾病,特别是在广泛阶段SCLC(ES-SCLC)。目前的标准治疗包括铂类药物化疗和依托泊苷+阿特珠单抗或durvalumab免疫治疗,在临床试验中,其平均总生存期为12-13个月。然而,ES-SCLC的长期生存,即使增加了免疫疗法,仍然是罕见的。我们介绍了一名诊断为ES-SCLC的中年男性患者,该患者接受了四个周期的诱导化疗(卡铂和依托泊苷)和阿特珠单抗治疗,此后每21天开始阿替珠单抗维持治疗,和胸部放疗。9个月后,他经历了轻微的疾病进展,并接受了6个周期的卡铂和依托泊苷治疗,并继续接受阿特珠单抗治疗。随后的成像显示几乎完全的疾病消退,此后一直持续。自诊断以来,他继续使用阿替珠单抗维持治疗,总生存期为60个月,无进展生存期为44个月。在整个治疗过程中,他保持了较高的功能能力,仅经历了一次与免疫相关的不良事件。我们的患者代表了能够实现对免疫疗法的持久反应的一小部分,他的病例强调需要进一步研究以阐明驱动这种反应的临床和生物学因素。
    Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a disease with poor prognosis, particularly in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). Current standard-of-care treatment includes chemotherapy with platinum agents and etoposide plus immunotherapy with atezolizumab or durvalumab, which has achieved a mean overall survival of 12-13 months in clinical trials. However, long-term survival in ES-SCLC, even with the addition of immunotherapy, continues to be rare. We present the case of a middle-aged male patient diagnosed with ES-SCLC who was treated with four cycles of induction chemotherapy (carboplatin and etoposide) and atezolizumab, starting maintenance atezolizumab every 21 days thereafter, and thoracic radiotherapy. After 9 months, he experienced mild disease progression and was rechallenged with six cycles of carboplatin and etoposide with continued atezolizumab. Subsequent imaging showed near-complete disease resolution which has been sustained since. He has continued on maintenance atezolizumab since diagnosis and has achieved 60 months overall survival and 44 months progression-free survival. Throughout treatment, he has maintained a high functional capacity and only experienced one immune-related adverse event. Our patient is representative of a small subset who are capable of achieving durable responses to immunotherapy and his case highlights the need for further research to elucidate the clinical and biological factors driving this response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项回顾性研究评估了康瑞珠单抗联合安洛替尼与化疗对接受二线治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的疗效。
    数据来自中国医疗机构的医疗记录,涉及34例一线治疗失败后诊断为ES-SCLC的患者。患者分为两组:一组接受卡利珠单抗(每3周200mg)和安洛替尼(每天12mg,共14天,然后休息7天)。而另一组接受医生选择的化疗每3周一次.主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR)。
    与化疗组相比,联合治疗组的PFS显着改善(中位PFS:7个月与3个月;风险比(HR):0.34;95%置信区间(CI):0.15-0.77;p<0.001)。然而,两组之间的OS无统计学差异(16.3个月vs.17.3个月;p=0.82)。联合治疗组的ORR为52.9%,而化疗组为23.5%(p=0.08),DCR为82.4%,为58.8%(p=0.26)。在联合治疗组的17.6%和化疗组的29.4%中观察到3级或更高的不良事件。
    研究结果表明,卡姆瑞珠单抗和安洛替尼的组合在二线环境中对ES-SCLC患者提供了优异的抗肿瘤反应和可控的安全性。这种组合方案可能是二线ES-SCLC治疗的可行选择。
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with anlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) undergoing second-line treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were sourced from medical records at a Chinese medical facility, involving 34 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC after failing first-line treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: one received camrelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) with anlotinib (12 mg daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest), while the other group received physician-chosen chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).
    UNASSIGNED: The combination therapy group showed a significant improvement in PFS compared to the chemotherapy group (median PFS: 7 months vs. 3 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-0.77; p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the groups (16.3 months vs. 17.3 months; p=0.82). The ORR was 52.9% in the combination therapy group versus 23.5% in the chemotherapy group (p=0.08), and the DCR was 82.4% compared to 58.8% (p=0.26). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 17.6% of the combination therapy group and 29.4% of the chemotherapy group.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest that the combination of camrelizumab and anlotinib offers a superior anti-tumor response with a manageable safety profile in a second-line setting for ES-SCLC patients. This combination regimen may be a viable option for second-line ES-SCLC treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨Hu抗体与人类白细胞抗原(HLA)和副肿瘤神经综合征(PNS)的关系。以及根据临床表现和癌症状态的潜在特异性。
    方法:从可用的全基因组关联数据估算4位数分辨率的HLA基因型。比较患者之间的等位基因携带者频率(整个队列,n=100,并且根据临床表现和癌症状态)和匹配的健康对照(n=508),使用由三个主要主成分控制的逻辑回归。
    结果:100例抗Hu患者的临床表现涉及中枢神经系统(28,28%),周围神经系统(36,36%)或两者结合(36,36%)。75(75%)的癌症诊断是肯定的。HLA关联分析显示,抗HuPNS患者更频繁地携带DQA1*05:01(39%vs.19%,OR=2.8[1.74-4.49]),DQB1*02:01(39%与18%,OR=2.88[1.79-4.64])和DRB1*03:01(41%与19%,OR=2.92[1.80-4.73])比健康对照组高。值得注意的是,这种DR3~DQ2的关联在纯中枢受累患者中不存在,但更具体的是那些表现为周围受累的人:DQA1*05:01(OR=3.12[1.48-6.60]),DQB1*02:01(OR=3.35[1.57-7.15])和DRB1*03:01(OR=3.62[1.64-7.97]);在感觉神经病变的情况下甚至更强,DQA1*05:01(OR=4.41[1.89-10.33]),DQB1*02:01(OR=4.85[2.04-11.53])和DRB1*03:01(OR=5.79[2.28-14.74])。同样,DR3~DQ2相关性仅在癌症患者中观察到。
    结论:抗HuPNS患者根据临床表现显示不同的HLA谱,可能,癌症状态,提示病理生理差异。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) with Hu antibodies, and potential specificities according to clinical presentation and cancer status.
    METHODS: HLA genotypes at four-digit resolution were imputed from available genome-wide association data. Allele carrier frequencies were compared between patients (whole cohort, n = 100, and according to clinical presentation and cancer status) and matched healthy controls (n = 508) using logistic regression controlled by the three main principal components.
    RESULTS: The clinical presentation of 100 anti-Hu patients involved the central nervous system (28, 28%), the peripheral nervous system (36, 36%) or both combined (36, 36%). Cancer diagnosis was certain in 75 (75%). HLA association analyses revealed that anti-Hu PNS patients were more frequently carriers of DQA1*05:01 (39% vs. 19%, OR = 2.8 [1.74-4.49]), DQB1*02:01 (39% vs. 18%, OR = 2.88 [1.79-4.64]) and DRB1*03:01 (41% vs. 19%, OR = 2.92 [1.80-4.73]) than healthy controls. Remarkably, such DR3 ~ DQ2 association was absent in patients with pure central involvement, but more specific to those manifesting with peripheral involvement: DQA1*05:01 (OR = 3.12 [1.48-6.60]), DQB1*02:01 (OR = 3.35 [1.57-7.15]) and DRB1*03:01 (OR = 3.62 [1.64-7.97]); being even stronger in cases with sensory neuropathy, DQA1*05:01 (OR = 4.41 [1.89-10.33]), DQB1*02:01 (OR = 4.85 [2.04-11.53]) and DRB1*03:01 (OR = 5.79 [2.28-14.74]). Similarly, DR3 ~ DQ2 association was only observed in patients with cancer.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with anti-Hu PNS show different HLA profiles according to clinical presentation and, probably, cancer status, suggesting pathophysiological differences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年营养风险指数(GNRI)根据血清白蛋白浓度和理想体重指示营养状况。预处理GNRI已被认为是各种恶性肿瘤的预后因素。然而,关于GNRI对小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的临床价值知之甚少,尤其是老年患者。
    我们回顾性分析了53例老年(≥71例)广泛性疾病(ED)SCLC患者接受一线铂双联化疗与治疗前GNRI水平的关系。
    36例GNRI低(<92)患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)在统计学上比17例GNRI高(≥92)患者差(中位PFS=80天vs.133天,分别为;p=0.002;中位OS=123天与274天,分别为;p=0.004)。在多变量分析中,低GNRI也是PFS的独立不良预后因素[风险比(HR)=0.396;95%置信区间(CI)=0.199-0.789;p=0.008]和OS(HR=0.295;95CI=0.143-0.608;p<0.001).
    GNRI可能是接受铂类双联化疗的老年ED-SCLC患者的预测和预后标志物。
    UNASSIGNED: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) indicates nutritional status based on serum albumin concentration and ideal body weight. Pretreatment GNRI has been suggested as a prognostic factor for various malignancies. However, little is known about the clinical value of GNRI for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), especially in elderly patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed 53 elderly (≥71) patients with extensive-disease (ED) SCLC treated with first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy in relation to the pretreatment GNRI level in a real-world setting.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six patients with a low GNRI (<92) had statistically poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than 17 patients with a high GNRI (≥92) (median PFS=80 days vs. 133 days, respectively; p=0.002; median OS=123 days vs. 274 days, respectively; p=0.004). In a multivariate analysis, a low GNRI was also an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.396; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.199-0.789; p=0.008] and OS (HR=0.295; 95%CI=0.143-0.608; p<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: The GNRI might be a predictive and prognostic marker in elderly patients with ED-SCLC treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    来自免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的免疫相关不良事件之一是皮肤毒性。口服皮质类固醇是严重皮肤免疫相关不良事件的一线治疗。然而,皮质类固醇可能与ICIs的疗效相冲突.一名有寻常型银屑病病史的55岁日本男子被诊断为小细胞肺癌(ⅣA期),并进行了联合化学免疫治疗,包括阿妥珠单抗,导致牛皮癣恶化。作为回应,他接受了生物制剂治疗,如抗IL-23和IL-17抗体,risankizumab,苏金单抗,分别,并通过阿司珠单抗持续治疗实现长期生存.该病例报告表明,生物制剂可能是ICI治疗引起的自身免疫相关不良事件的最佳治疗方案。
    One of the immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is skin toxicity. Oral corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for severe cutaneous immune-related adverse events. However, corticosteroids may conflict with the efficacy of ICIs. A 55-year-old Japanese man with a history of psoriasis vulgaris was diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (Stage ⅣA) and administered combined chemoimmunotherapy, including atezolizumab, which resulted in exacerbation of psoriasis. In response, he was treated with biological agents, such as anti-IL-23 and IL-17 antibodies, risankizumab, and secukinumab, respectively, and achieved long-term survival with continued treatment with atezolizumab. This case report suggests that biological agents might be the best course of treatment against autoimmune-related adverse events caused by ICI therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是最致命的肺癌形式。肿瘤内异质性,以神经内分泌(NE)和非神经内分泌(非NE)细胞状态为标志,定义SCLC,但对SCLC可塑性的细胞外在驱动因素知之甚少。要绘制SCLC肿瘤微环境(TME)的景观,我们将空间分辨转录组学和基于定量质谱的蛋白质组学应用于通过快速尸检获得的转移性SCLC肿瘤.TME中非恶性细胞的表型和总体组成表现出实质性的变异性。密切反映肿瘤表型,表明TME驱动的NE细胞状态的重编程。我们确定癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAFs)是SCLCTME异质性的关键因素,有助于免疫排斥,并预测异常不良的预后。我们的工作提供了SCLC肿瘤和TME生态系统的全面地图,强调它们在SCLC适应性中的关键作用,为重新编程塑造SCLC肿瘤状态的TME-肿瘤通信开辟了可能性。
    Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most fatal form of lung cancer. Intratumoral heterogeneity, marked by neuroendocrine (NE) and non-neuroendocrine (non-NE) cell states, defines SCLC, but the cell-extrinsic drivers of SCLC plasticity are poorly understood. To map the landscape of SCLC tumor microenvironment (TME), we apply spatially resolved transcriptomics and quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics to metastatic SCLC tumors obtained via rapid autopsy. The phenotype and overall composition of non-malignant cells in the TME exhibit substantial variability, closely mirroring the tumor phenotype, suggesting TME-driven reprogramming of NE cell states. We identify cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) as a crucial element of SCLC TME heterogeneity, contributing to immune exclusion, and predicting exceptionally poor prognosis. Our work provides a comprehensive map of SCLC tumor and TME ecosystems, emphasizing their pivotal role in SCLC\'s adaptable nature, opening possibilities for reprogramming the TME-tumor communications that shape SCLC tumor states.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们探索了接受Durvalumab(D)+曲美木单抗(T)+依托泊苷铂(EP)治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的免疫治疗反应的潜在预测生物标志物,D+EP,或EP在随机3期CASPIAN试验中。
    方法:805例未治疗的ES-SCLC患者随机(1:1:1)接受D+T+EP,D+EP,或EP。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。患者在筛选时需要提供存档的肿瘤组织块(或≥15个新切割的未染色载玻片),如果这些样本存在。在评估程序性细胞死亡配体-1表达和组织肿瘤突变负担后,残余组织用于其他分子谱分析,包括通过RNA测序和免疫组织化学.
    结果:在182例转录分子亚型患者中,在SCLC炎症亚型中,具有D±TEP的OS在数值上最高(n=10,中位数24.0个月)。患者从不同亚型的免疫疗法中获益;因此,研究了其他生物标志物.通过免疫组织化学,高CD8A表达/低CD8细胞密度与D±TEP相比,EP的OS益处更大。但D+T+EP与D+EP相比没有额外益处。D+T+EP与D+EP的OS获益与CD4高表达相关(中位数25.9vs.11.4个月)和抗原呈递和加工机械(25.9vs.14.6个月)和MHCI和II(23.6与17.3个月)基因签名,免疫组织化学显示MHCI表达较高。
    结论:这些研究结果表明,肿瘤微环境对于调节ES-SCLC中D±T+EP的更好结局很重要,与与假设的免疫治疗作用机制相关的经典免疫标记物定义了对D±T。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03043872。
    BACKGROUND: We explored potential predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + etoposide-platinum (EP), D + EP, or EP in the randomized phase 3 CASPIAN trial.
    METHODS: 805 treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive D + T + EP, D + EP, or EP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were required to provide an archived tumor tissue block (or ≥ 15 newly cut unstained slides) at screening, if these samples existed. After assessment for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden, residual tissue was used for additional molecular profiling including by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry.
    RESULTS: In 182 patients with transcriptional molecular subtyping, OS with D ± T + EP was numerically highest in the SCLC-inflamed subtype (n = 10, median 24.0 months). Patients derived benefit from immunotherapy across subtypes; thus, additional biomarkers were investigated. OS benefit with D ± T + EP versus EP was greater with high versus low CD8A expression/CD8 cell density by immunohistochemistry, but with no additional benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP. OS benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP was associated with high expression of CD4 (median 25.9 vs. 11.4 months) and antigen-presenting and processing machinery (25.9 vs. 14.6 months) and MHC I and II (23.6 vs. 17.3 months) gene signatures, and with higher MHC I expression by immunohistochemistry.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the tumor microenvironment is important in mediating better outcomes with D ± T + EP in ES-SCLC, with canonical immune markers associated with hypothesized immunotherapy mechanisms of action defining patient subsets that respond to D ± T.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号