Sensation

感觉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:前臂游离皮瓣成形术(RFFF)是一套复杂的重建程序,旨在为变性患者创造美观和功能性的阴茎。新生阴茎和供体部位的感觉恢复对于优化结果至关重要,但是,现有的少数研究在有限的位置和时间点评估新生的感觉。这项研究的目的是前瞻性地量化RFFF球囊成形术后新生阴茎和供体部位的感觉结果。
    方法:在2019年2月至2021年1月期间,使用压力指定的感觉装置(PSSD)对1期RFFF阴茎成形术患者进行了前瞻性感觉测试。在新人类身上,在近端到远端的六个周向位置测量了单点判别(1PS)压力阈值和纵向感觉恢复。在捐赠现场,在供体手上的三个位置测量1PS。
    结果:纳入19例患者(平均年龄34.0岁,范围18-53年)。在接受新生儿检查的患者中(n=13),八人至少有两次后续预约。这些患者中有6人在最近的测量中有感觉(75.0%),平均73天才能恢复感觉。右侧腹侧感觉的患者比例明显更高(3个月后80.0%vs.3个月前11.1%-60.0%,p=0.024)和右外侧(3个月后100.0%vs.3个月前11.1%-60.0%,p=0.004)随着时间的推移,新生阴茎的各个方面。术后1周至1个月至术后3-7.7个月,右腹侧新生阴茎产生感觉所需的压力降低了18.0%(96.2g/mm2±11.3g/mm2至56.6±39.9g/mm2,p=0.037)。在接受供体部位检测的患者中(n=11),随机截距的混合效应回归分析显示,拇指(3.4g/mm2±1.4g/mm2,p<0.05)和网络空间(13.5g/mm2±4.9g/mm2,p<0.01)在术后3个月恢复至基线(分别为1.7g/mm2±1.0g/mm2,p>0.05和2.3g/mm2±4.0g/mm2,p>0.05)显著变化.
    结论:这项初步研究表明,定量感觉测试可用于监测阴囊成形术后的感觉变化。恢复与对侧显着相关(i。e,左前臂RFF中的右侧)新生阴茎的方面,提示通过RFFF感觉神经的圆周感觉神经支配的可能模式。未来的研究需要更大的样本量和更长的随访时间,以充分表征阴茎成形术患者的感觉恢复。
    BACKGROUND: Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty (RFFF) is a set of complex reconstructive procedures aimed at creating an aesthetic and functional penis in transgender patients. Sensory recovery in the neophallus and donor site is crucial for optimizing outcomes, but the few prior studies that exist assess neophallus sensation at limited locations and time points. The purpose of this study was to prospectively quantify sensory outcomes in the neophallus and donor site following RFFF phalloplasty.
    METHODS: Sensation testing occurred prospectively over February 2019-January 2021 on Stage 1 RFFF phalloplasty patients using the Pressure Specified Sensory Device (PSSD). On the neophallus, one-point discrimination (1PS) pressure threshold and lengthwise sensory recovery were measured at six circumferential locations proximally to distally. On the donor site, 1PS was measured at three locations on the donor hand.
    RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included (average age 34.0 years old, range 18-53 years). Among patients that received neophallus testing (n = 13), eight had at least two follow-up appointments. Six of these patients had sensation as of their most recent measurement (75.0%), with an average of 73 days to regain sensation. There was a significantly greater proportion of patients with sensation at the right ventral (80.0% after 3 months vs. 11.1%-60.0% before 3 months, p = 0.024) and right lateral (100.0% after 3 months vs. 11.1%-60.0% before 3 months, p = 0.004) aspects of the neophallus over time. Pressure required to elicit sensation decreased by 18.0% from 1 week-1 month postoperatively to 3-7.7 months postoperatively in the right ventral neophallus (96.2 g/mm2 ± 11.3 g/mm2 to 56.6 ± 39.9 g/mm2, p = 0.037). Among patients that received donor site testing (n = 11), mixed effects regression analysis with random intercepts demonstrated significant changes in the thumb (3.4 g/mm2 ± 1.4 g/mm2, p < 0.05) and webspace (13.5 g/mm2 ± 4.9 g/mm2, p < 0.01) that returned to baseline at 3 months postoperatively (1.7 g/mm2 ± 1.0 g/mm2, p > 0.05, and 2.3 g/mm2 ± 4.0 g/mm2, p > 0.05, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that quantitative sensory testing can be used to monitor post-phalloplasty sensory changes. Recovery was significantly associated with contralateral (i.e, right side in a left forearm RFF) aspects of the neophallus, suggesting a possible pattern of circumferential sensory innervation via RFFF sensory nerves. Future studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-ups are necessary to fully characterize sensory recovery in phalloplasty patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着消费者对模仿动物产品的食用体验的植物性产品的需求不断增长,需要改进感官质地的仪器测量。这项研究旨在表征乳制品和非乳制品奶酪之间的质地差异,并研究大振幅振荡剪切(LAOS)流变仪是否可以比纹理轮廓分析更好地区分感觉纹理。商业乳制品和非乳制品切达干酪,马苏里拉奶酪,和奶油干酪被选择以提供广泛的质地。对73位消费者进行的感官评估使用了全部检查方法。纹理轮廓分析力-距离数据进行了实证分析,并转换为应力和应变(请参阅https://shiny。csiro.au/texture_dash)。乳品和非乳品切达干酪之间的主要质地差异与结构凝聚力有关,根据仪器测量(乳品切达干酪的破坏应力高1.5倍,破坏应变高2.2倍)和感官测量(乳品切达干酪耐嚼,易碎少)。相比之下,使用感官测试,奶油干酪显示出相似的质地特性,但有显着的仪器差异(非乳制奶油干酪的变形模量高5.7倍,4.7倍高的失效应力)。对于马苏里拉奶酪,两种感官属性都有很大的差异(耐嚼,易碎,果冻般的,弹性)和仪器参数(模量相差13.6倍,破坏应力的2.7倍差异)。LAOS流变仪深入了解了样品在非线性应变下吸收或耗散机械能的机理。LAOS参数G3\'/G1\'${G}_3^{\\prime}/{G}_1^{\\prime}$$与感官属性奶油相关良好,脂肪/油性,潮湿,表明这种技术测量与消费者产生共鸣的感官属性相关的结构现象的潜力。
    With growing consumer demand for plant-based products that mimic the eating experience of animal-based products, there is a need for improvement in instrumental measurements of sensory texture. This study aimed to characterize textural differences between dairy and non-dairy cheeses, and to investigate whether Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (LAOS) rheometry could discriminate sensory texture better than Texture profile analysis. Commercial dairy and non-dairy cheddar, mozzarella, and cream cheese were selected to provide a wide range of textures. Sensory evaluation used the check-all-that-apply methodology with 73 consumers. Texture profile analysis force-distance data were analyzed empirically, and also converted to stress and strain (see https://shiny.csiro.au/texture_dash). The major textural differences between dairy and non-dairy cheddar were related to structural cohesion, according to both instrumental measures (dairy cheddar had 1.5-fold higher failure stress and 2.2-fold higher failure strain) and sensory measurements (dairy cheddar was more chewy and less crumbly). In contrast, cream cheeses showed similar textural properties using sensory testing but significant instrumental differences (non-dairy cream cheese had 5.7-fold higher modulus of deformability, 4.7-fold higher failure stress). For mozzarella, there were large differences in both sensory attributes (chewy, crumbly, jelly-like, stretchy) and instrumental parameters (13.6-fold difference in modulus, 2.7-fold difference in failure stress). LAOS rheometry gave insights into the mechanisms by which samples absorbed or dissipated mechanical energy at nonlinear strains. The LAOS parameter G 3 \' / G 1 \' $$ {G}_3^{\\prime }/{G}_1^{\\prime } $$ correlated well with sensory attributes creamy, fatty/oily, and moist, indicating the potential of this technique to measure structural phenomena linked to sensory attributes that resonate with consumers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了有或没有睡眠问题的典型发育幼儿的感官处理。该研究小组由通常患有睡眠问题的幼儿组成(n=110,平均年龄=18.35±3.4个月),而对照组包括通常没有睡眠问题的发育中的幼儿(n=110,平均年龄=18.67±3.5个月)及其母亲。幼儿根据他们的睡眠问题被分配到研究组和对照组,根据简短的婴儿睡眠问卷确定。使用婴儿/幼儿感官概况2评估幼儿的感官处理。比较研究组和对照组的感官模式和感官加工子参数。研究组的感官处理在低注册(低意识或对感官刺激的冷漠态度)中显示出非典型的行为反应,感官敏感性(分心或易怒的态度,受到感官刺激的强烈刺激),和感官回避(有意回避产生异常反应的感官刺激或态度)模式与对照组相比(p<0.05)。行为反应在感官寻求(寻找感官刺激时对环境的干扰或危险态度)模式中相似(p>0.309)。与对照组相比,感官处理的所有子参数均具有统计学上的显着差异。我们的发现表明,有睡眠问题的幼儿有感觉处理问题的风险。有睡眠问题的幼儿表现出与感觉敏感性相关的非典型感觉反应,低注册,和感官避免。应该考虑到有睡眠问题的幼儿可能对不同的感官刺激表现出敏感性,避免或可能无法识别感官刺激。这些发现表明,在对有睡眠问题的幼儿的跨学科护理中纳入感官状况评估可能有助于父母与婴儿的健康。
    This study investigates the sensory processing of typically developing toddlers with and without sleep problems. The research group consisted of typically developing toddlers with sleep problems (n = 110, mean age=18.35 ± 3.4 months), while the control group included typically developing toddlers without sleep problems (n = 110, mean age=18.67 ± 3.5 months) and their mothers. Toddlers were assigned to the research and control groups based on their sleep problems, as determined by the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire. The sensory processing of the toddlers was evaluated using the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile 2. Sensory patterns and sensory processing sub-parameters of the research and control groups were compared. The sensory processing of the research group showed atypical behavioral responses in low registration (low awareness or indifferent attitude to sensory stimuli), sensory sensitivity (distracted or irritable attitude, intensely stimulated by sensory stimuli), and sensory avoiding (intentional avoidance of sensory stimuli or attitudes that produce out-of-norm responses) patterns compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Behavioral responses were similar in the sensory seeking (disturbing or dangerous attitude to the environment in search of sensory stimuli) pattern (p > 0.309). Statistically significant differences were observed in all sub-parameters of sensory processing compared to the control group. Our findings indicate that toddlers with sleep problems are at risk for sensory processing issues. Toddlers with sleep problems exhibit atypical sensory responses related to sensory sensitivity, low registration, and sensory avoiding. It should be considered that toddlers with sleep problems may show sensitivity to different sensory stimuli, avoidance or may not be able to recognize sensory stimuli. These findings suggest that the inclusion of sensory profile assessments in interdisciplinary care for toddlers with sleep problems may contribute to parent-infant well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有颞下颌关节内疾病(IA-TMD)的个体经常报告张口活动的局限性。虽然临床措施,如主动运动范围(AROM)和运动质量通常用于评估张口功能,目前尚不清楚这些因素是否以及如何与患者报告的局限性相关,以及运动恐惧症等其他因素是否会影响IA-TMD患者的张口活动.
    目的:比较IA-TMD患者与无症状对照组患者张口功能的临床指标。在那些有IA/TMD的人中,探索患者报告的张口限制之间的关系,张口功能和运动恐惧症。
    方法:横断面研究。
    方法:临床张口功能(AROM,运动质量,运动时疼痛/10,运动时僵硬/10)进行组间比较(n=30IA-TMD,n=30个控件)。在IA-TMD集团内,患者报告的张口限制之间的相关性(患者特定功能量表),探讨了运动恐惧症(颞下颌关节紊乱病运动恐惧症的坦帕量表)和张口功能的临床测量。
    结果:AROM减值(-4毫米,p=0.04,d=0.5),运动质量(p<0.01,φ=0.6),与对照组相比,IA-TMD组观察到运动疼痛(p<0.01,d=0.8)和运动僵硬(p<0.01,d=1.6)。患者报告的张口限制和运动恐惧症显着相关(r=-0.48,p<0.01);患者报告的限制与临床张口措施之间没有相关性(r<0.3,p>0.05)。
    结论:IA-TMD患者张口功能受损。然而,运动恐惧症似乎与患者报告的张口限制有关,而不是与临床损害有关。考虑临床,运动恐惧症和患者报告的限制措施对于指导接受护理的患者IA-TMD的管理是必要的。
    Individuals living with intra-articular temporomandibular disorders (IA-TMDs) often report limitations with mouth opening activities. While clinical measures such as active range of motion (AROM) and movement quality are often used to assess mouth opening function, it is unclear if and how these relate to patient-reported limitations and whether other factors such as kinesiophobia influence mouth opening activities in those with IA-TMDs.
    Compare clinical measures of mouth opening function in those with IA-TMDs to asymptomatic controls. In those with an IA/TMD, explore relationships between patient-reported mouth opening limitations, and mouth opening function and kinesiophobia.
    Cross-sectional study.
    Clinical mouth opening function (AROM, movement quality, pain on movement/10, stiffness on movement/10) was compared between groups (n = 30 IA-TMD, n = 30 controls). Within the IA-TMD group, correlations between patient-reported mouth opening limitations (Patient specific functional scale), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders) and clinical measures of mouth opening function were explored.
    Impairments in AROM (-4 mm, p = 0.04, d = 0.5), movement quality (p < 0.01, φ = 0.6), pain on movement (p < 0.01, d = 0.8) and stiffness on movement (p < 0.01, d = 1.6) were observed in the IA-TMD group compared to controls. Patient-reported mouth opening limitations and kinesiophobia were significantly correlated (r = -0.48, p < 0.01); no correlation was found between patient-reported limitations and clinical mouth opening measures (r < 0.3, p > 0.05).
    Mouth opening function is impaired in IA-TMD. However, kinesiophobia appears more related to patient-reported mouth opening limitations than clinical impairments. Consideration of clinical, kinesiophobia and patient-reported limitation measures are necessary to direct management of IA-TMD in those presenting for care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:难治性或无法解释的慢性咳嗽(RUCC)是一个常见的临床问题,没有有效的诊断工具。开发了“感觉和触发引发咳嗽问卷”(TOPIC),以表征RUCC中的咳嗽与其他疾病中的咳嗽。
    方法:讨论慢性咳嗽的感觉和触发因素的参与者访谈的内容分析告知TOPIC发展。慢性咳嗽的参与者完成了TOPIC草案(5-7天后重复的子集),圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ),咳嗽严重程度日记(CSD)和全球变化量表评级。在分层和Rasch分析中减少了TOPIC项目清单草案,以将问卷细化为TOPIC。
    结果:49项描述咳嗽的诱因和感觉的项目来自参与者访谈(RUCCn=14,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)n=11,间质性肺疾病(ILD)n=10,哮喘n=11,支气管扩张n=3,囊性纤维化n=7)。140名参与者(中位年龄60.0(19.0-88.0),女性56.4%;RUCCn=39,ILDn=38,哮喘n=45,COPDn=6,支气管扩张n=12)完成草案-TOPIC,其中删除了RUCC的“fit”较差的项目以创建TOPIC(8个触发项目,7个感觉项目)。RUCC(37.0)与ILD(24.5,p=0.009)和哮喘(7.0,p<0.001)相比,TOPIC评分中位数明显更高,但不是支气管扩张(20.0,p=0.318)或COPD(18.5,p=0.238),可能是由于样本量小。Rasch模型在RUCC中表现出优异的拟合(χ2=22.04,p=0.85;PSI=0.88);如预期的那样。当包括所有参与者组时,由于异质性增加(CI=0.077),不再证明拟合(χ2=66.43,p=0.0001,PSI=0.89)。TOPIC与SGRQ(r=0.47,p<0.001)和CSD(r=0.63,p<0.001)呈正相关。TOPIC(组内相关系数)的重测可靠性非常好(r=0.90,p<0.001)。
    结论:RUCC患者的高TOPIC评分表明他们的咳嗽具有特定的感觉和触发因素。咳嗽诊所中TOPIC的验证可能证明其有助于识别RUCC与其他条件下咳嗽的特征。
    BACKGROUND: Refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RUCC) is a common clinical problem with no effective diagnostic tools. The Sensations and Triggers Provoking Cough questionnaire (TOPIC) was developed to characterise cough in RUCC versus cough in other conditions.
    METHODS: Content analysis of participant interviews discussing the sensations and triggers of chronic cough informed TOPIC development. Participants with chronic cough completed the draft-TOPIC (a subset repeating 5-7 days later), St George\'s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Cough Severity Diary (CSD) and Global Rating of Change Scale. The draft-TOPIC item list was reduced in hierarchical and Rasch analysis to refine the questionnaire to the TOPIC.
    RESULTS: 49 items describing the triggers and sensations of cough were generated from participant interviews (RUCC n=14, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) n=11, interstitial lung disease (ILD) n=10, asthma n=11, bronchiectasis n=3, cystic fibrosis n=7). 140 participants (median age 60.0 (19.0-88.0), female 56.4%; RUCC n=39, ILD n=38, asthma n=45, COPD n=6, bronchiectasis n=12) completed draft-TOPIC, where items with poor \'fit\' for RUCC were removed to create TOPIC (8 trigger items, 7 sensation items). Median TOPIC score was significantly higher in RUCC (37.0) vs ILD (24.5, p=0.009) and asthma (7.0, p<0.001), but not bronchiectasis (20.0, p=0.318) or COPD (18.5, p=0.238), likely due to small sample sizes. The Rasch model demonstrated excellent fit in RUCC (χ2=22.04, p=0.85; PSI=0.88); as expected. When all participant groups were included, fit was no longer demonstrated (χ2=66.43, p=0.0001, PSI=0.89) due to the increased heterogeneity (CI=0.077). TOPIC correlated positively with SGRQ (r=0.47, p<0.001) and CSD (r=0.63, p<0.001). The test-retest reliability of TOPIC (intraclass correlation coefficient) was excellent (r=0.90, p<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: High TOPIC scores in the RUCC patients suggest their cough is characterised by specific sensations and triggers. Validation of TOPIC in cough clinics may demonstrate value as an aid to identify features of RUCC versus cough in other conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    吞咽困难在运动神经元疾病(MND)中很常见,并与负面健康和社会心理结果有关。虽然在很大程度上被认为是一种运动疾病,越来越多的证据表明MND也会影响感觉系统。因为完整的感觉对于安全吞咽至关重要,感觉变化会影响MND患者吞咽困难的临床治疗,这篇综述评估并总结了目前MND吞咽相关感觉变化的证据。在最初确定的3481篇文章中,29符合纳入标准。其中,20项研究报告了感官变化,其中包括喉觉,味道,呕吐反射,咳嗽反射,舌头的感觉,气味,腭和咽感,无声的渴望,和不确定的吞咽机制的感觉。感官变化被描述为减少(n=16)或增加(n=4)。在剩下的九项研究中,据报道感觉功能未受影响.MND中与吞咽相关的感觉功能变化的存在尚不确定,尽管越来越多的研究报告了某些感官领域的感官变化。需要进一步的研究来评估MND的感觉变化的患病率以及这种变化如何影响吞咽困难及其管理。
    Dysphagia is common in motor neurone disease (MND) and associated with negative health and psychosocial outcomes. Although largely considered a motor disease, a growing body of evidence suggests that MND can also affect the sensory system. As intact sensation is vital for safe swallowing, and sensory changes can influence the clinical management of dysphagia in people living with MND, this review evaluated and summarised the current evidence for sensory changes related to swallowing in MND. Of 3,481 articles originally identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 studies reported sensory changes, which included laryngeal sensation, taste, gag reflex, cough reflex, tongue sensation, smell, palatal and pharyngeal sensation, silent aspiration, and undefined sensation of the swallowing mechanism. Sensory changes were either described as decreased (n = 16) or heightened (n = 4). In the remaining nine studies, sensory function was reported as unaffected. The presence of changes to sensory function related to swallowing in MND remains inconclusive, although an increasing number of studies report sensory changes in some sensory domains. Future research is needed to evaluate the prevalence of sensory changes in MND and how such changes may influence dysphagia and its management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:外科医生精心做乳房缩小术,同时确保椎弓根和乳头-乳晕复合体(NAC)的血管完整性,以防止任何并发症。重要的是要记住,感觉的丧失也是实质性的并发症,主要是由于NAC的独特特征。本研究旨在通过对超内侧椎弓根乳房缩小后的NAC感觉进行地形图分析,比较早期和长期的感觉结果。
    方法:在2019年1月至2022年6月期间,进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入了非随机女性患者,这些患者接受了明智式切除超内侧椎弓根技术的乳房缩小手术。术前进行Semmes-Weinstein单丝(SWM)测试,术后3-6个月和15-18个月。NAC复合物分为四个相等的象限和乳头:超内侧(SM),下颌(IM),下外侧(IL),上外侧(SL)和乳头(N)。使用触摸测试®感官评估图表来评估感官结果。
    结果:在术前SWM测试中没有患者有任何感觉丧失。术后3-6个月,在N和SL之间观察到统计学上的显着差异(p=0.002),SL和IM(p<0.05),SM和IM(p<0.05)。术后15-18个月,象限和乳头之间没有差异(p=0.07)。在同一象限的早期和长期比较中,IL不如其他象限比较明显(p=0.034)。在总体NAC评分中观察到统计学差异(p<0.05)。
    结论:告知患者术后的总体NAC感觉可能不如术前好,在早期,不同象限的NAC感觉可能存在差异。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: Surgeons meticulously perform breast reductions, while ensuring vascular integrity of the pedicle and Nipple-Areolar complex (NAC) to prevent any complication. It is crucial to remember that loss of sensation is also substantial complication, mainly due to unique characteristic features of the NAC. This study aimed to compare early and long-term sensory results by performing topographic analysis of NAC sensation after superomedial pedicle breast reduction.
    METHODS: A prospective study was conducted by including nonrandomized female patients who underwent breast reduction surgery with wise pattern excision superomedial pedicle technique between January 2019 and June 2022. Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament (SWM) test performed at preoperatively, 3-6 months and 15-18 months postoperatively. NAC complex was divided into four equal quadrants and nipple: superomedial (SM), inferomedial (IM), inferolateral (IL), superolateral (SL) and Nipple (N). Touch-Test® Sensory Evaluator Chart was used to evaluate sensory results.
    RESULTS: None of the patients had any loss of sensation during preoperative SWM test. In postoperative 3-6 months, statistically significant differences were observed between N and SL (p = 0.002), SL and IM (p < 0.05), SM and IM (p < 0.05). In postoperative 15-18 months, there was no difference between the quadrants and nipple (p = 0.07). In early and long-term comparisons of the same quadrants, IL less pronounced than other quadrant comparisons (p = 0.034). A statistical difference was observed in overall NAC score (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: It would be beneficial to inform patients overall NAC sensation in the postoperative may not be as good as preoperative, there might be variations in NAC sensation across different quadrants in early period.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估两种不同参数(体位和扩张介质)对功能性便秘患者直肠感觉测试的影响,为临床实践中标准化操作程序的制定提供数据支持。
    方法:基于直肠感觉测试的单中心过程,对39例功能性便秘患者在不同体位和扩张介质下进行直肠感觉测试。
    结果:在便秘评分系统的项目中,排便次数评分与第一恒定感觉量呈负相关(r=-0.323,P=0.045)。相反,疼痛性疏散努力得分与排便欲望呈正相关(r=0.343,P=0.033)。在不同体位(左侧卧位,坐姿,蹲下位置),蹲位测量的数据明显高于左侧卧位(P<0.05)。在膨胀介质的研究方面,发现在下蹲位置(当膨胀介质为水时)测得的第一恒定感觉量明显低于气体(P<0.05)。
    结论:对于功能性便秘患者,体位和扩张介质之间的直肠感觉测试结果存在差异。在进行多中心研究时,有必要统一标准操作程序(SOP)的操作细节,以确保测试结果的一致性和可靠性。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of two different parameters (body position and distension medium) on the rectal sensory test in patients with functional constipation and provide data support for the development of standardized operating procedures in clinical practice.
    METHODS: Based on a single-center process of the rectal sensory test, 39 patients with functional constipation were recruited for rectal sensory test under different body positions and distension mediums.
    RESULTS: Among the items of the Constipation Scoring System, the score of frequency of bowel movements showed a negative correlation with the first constant sensation volume (r = -0.323, P = 0.045). Conversely, the score of painful evacuation effort showed a positive correlation with the desire to defecate volume (r = 0.343, P = 0.033). There was a statistically significant difference in the first constant sensation volume (when the distension medium was gas) measured in different body positions (left lateral position, sitting position, squatting position), and the data measured in the squatting position were significantly higher than those in left lateral position (P < 0.05). In terms of research on distension medium, it was found that the first constant sensation volume measured in the squatting position (when the distension medium was water) was significantly lower than that of gas (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients with functional constipation, there are differences in the results of rectal sensory tests between body positions and distension mediums. When conducting multicenter studies, it is necessary to unify the standard operating procedure (SOP) for operational details to ensure consistency and reliability of the test results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:可以在上肢周围神经损伤后进行感觉神经转移以恢复保护性感觉和触觉感觉。关于感觉神经转移的可用供体-受体配置的文献很少。本文对已报道的上肢感觉神经转移进行了系统综述。
    方法:在MEDLINE和EMBASE中搜索了1982年至2022年之间发表的原始文章。如果报告了患者的感觉结果,则包括描述感觉神经转移的文章。结果根据修改后的英国医学研究委员会量表进行分类,结果为S3或更好地定义为令人满意。
    结果:在1,049篇文章中,39符合纳入和质量标准。27篇文章是主要研究研究,报告了197例接受11种独特的非数字感觉供体神经转移和24种独特的数字供体神经转移程序的患者。恢复小指尺骨缘感觉的最可靠的受体神经是小指尺骨正指神经(38例,89%满意的感官结果)。转移到小指适当的尺指神经的最佳供体是长指适当的尺指神经(16例患者,87.5%良好的感觉结果)和正中神经掌皮支(15例,100%良好的感官结果)。为了恢复拇指尺骨边界和食指放射状的感觉,最好的供体是桡神经的浅支,无论转移到共同指神经1(38例患者,成功率63%)或直接指向拇指的尺骨指神经或食指的桡骨指神经(9名患者,成功率67%)。
    结论:感觉神经转移后的结果通常良好。试图重建感觉时,外科医生应转移到数字神经接受者。
    方法:治疗IV。
    OBJECTIVE: Sensory nerve transfers may be performed to restore protective sensation and tactile perception after peripheral nerve injury in the upper extremity. There is a paucity of literature on the available donor-recipient configurations for sensory nerve transfers. This article presents a systematic review of reported sensory nerve transfers in the upper extremity.
    METHODS: Original articles published between 1982 and 2022 were searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Articles describing a sensory nerve transfer were included if patient sensory outcomes were reported. Outcomes were categorized according to the modified British Medical Research Council scale, with an outcome of S3 or better defined as satisfactory.
    RESULTS: Of 1,049 articles, 39 met inclusion and quality criteria. Twenty-seven articles were primary research studies reporting on 197 patients who underwent 11 unique nondigital sensory donor nerve transfers and 24 unique digital donor nerve transfer procedures. The most reliable recipient nerve for restoring sensation to the ulnar border of the small finger was proper ulnar digital nerve of the small finger (38 patients, 89% satisfactory sensory outcome). The best available donors for transfer into the proper ulnar digital nerve of the small finger were proper ulnar digital nerve of the long finger (16 patients, 87.5% good sensory outcome) and palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (15 patients, 100% good sensory outcome). To restore sensation along the ulnar border of the thumb and radial aspect of the index finger, the best available donor was the superficial branch of the radial nerve, regardless of transfer into common digital nerve 1 (38 patients, success rate 63%) or directly to proper ulnar digital nerve of the thumb or proper radial digital nerve of the index finger (nine patients, success rates 67%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after sensory nerve transfers are generally good. Surgeons should transfer into a digital nerve recipient when attempting to reconstruct sensation.
    METHODS: Therapeutic IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号