Salud mental

Salud 精神
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近,ICD-11和DSM-5-TR诊断手册中都包含了长期悲伤障碍(PGD)。研究其流行程度和跨文化相关性对于更有效的识别至关重要,治疗,和预防。目的:本研究旨在检查基于ICD-11的PGD的患病率,在斯洛伐克代表性样本中,以应对前一年发生的亲人死亡。进一步的目的是检查PGD症状的因素结构以及PGD项目评分和PGD“caseness”的相关性。方法:自报PGD数据,抑郁症,焦虑,酒精使用,和描述性特征是从斯洛伐克人口的代表性样本中收集的(N=319)。结果:数据来自N=1853人;319名参与者(17.2%)在过去一年中报告了损失。这些失去亲人的参与者中可能的PGD的患病率为1.99%,最近的损失(<6个月,n=151)和7.75%,对于更遥远的损失(6-12个月,n=130)。最常见的认可症状包括对死者的渴望/渴望,悲伤,否认/不现实,难以接受死亡。PGD症状具有单一的因子结构,这对于失去1-5个月和6-12个月的子样本是一致的。PGD的严重程度随亲属关系而变化。抑郁和焦虑,但不是酒精滥用,与PGD严重程度和PGD严重程度相关。结论:这些发现强调了大量的人在损失后6-12个月之间发展为PGD。这强调了有针对性的心理干预的必要性。
    长期悲伤障碍(PGD)新纳入ICD-11,迫切需要了解其在普通人群中的患病率和相关性。在一个代表性的斯洛伐克样本中(N=1853),319人(17.2%)在过去一年中报告了损失;7.75%的人,6-12个月前丧亲,符合基于ICD-11的PGD标准。PGD的严重程度和caseness与亲属关系(但与其他社会人口统计学和损失特征不那么强烈)以及抑郁和焦虑(但与有问题的饮酒不太强烈)相关。损失后6-12个月,PGD在普通人群中似乎相当普遍,及时识别和缓解PGD是一个重要的公共卫生问题。
    Background: Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) has recently been included in both the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR diagnostic manuals. Studying its prevalence and correlates across cultures is vital for more effective identification, treatment, and prevention.Objective: This study aimed to examine prevalence rates of ICD-11-based PGD, in a representative Slovakian sample in response to deaths of loved ones occurring during the previous year. Further aims were to examine the factor structure of PGD symptoms and correlates of summed PGD item scores and PGD \'caseness\'.Method: Self-reported data on PGD, depression, anxiety, alcohol use, and descriptive characteristics were gathered from a representative sample of the Slovak population (N = 319).Results: Data were gathered from N = 1853 people; 319 participants (17.2%) reported a loss in the past year. The prevalence of probable PGD among these bereaved participants was 1.99% for recent losses (<6 months, n = 151) and 7.75% for more distant losses (6-12 months, n = 130). The most frequently endorsed symptoms included longing/yearning for the deceased, sadness, denial/unrealness, and difficulty accepting the death. PGD symptoms had a unitary factor structure which was consistent for subsamples bereaved 1-5 and 6-12 months. The severity of PGD varied with kinship. Depression and anxiety, but not alcohol misuse, were associated with PGD severity and PGD caseness.Conclusions: These findings underscore that a significant group of people develop PGD between 6-12 months following a loss. This emphasises the need for targeted psychological interventions.
    Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is newly included in ICD-11 and knowledge about its prevalence and correlates in the general population is urgently needed.In a representative Slovakian sample (N = 1853), 319 people (17.2%) reported a loss during the past year; 7.75% of people, bereaved 6–12 months earlier, met criteria for ICD-11-based PGD.PGD severity and caseness were associated with kinship (but less strongly with other sociodemographic and loss characteristics) and with depression and anxiety (but less strongly with problematic alcohol use).At 6–12 months following loss, PGD seems fairly common in the general population and timely identification and mitigation of PGD is an important public health issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:安蒂奥基亚大学[安蒂奥基亚大学]医学院LivingLab设计了一个远程保健心理健康计划。
    目的:描述该计划的发展和运作,并评估2020年和2021年COVID-19大流行期间接受治疗的患者的满意度。
    方法:描述性研究,详细介绍了该计划的发展。从医疗记录中提取数据以描述接受治疗的患者。将满意度量表应用于随机样本,并通过描述性统计对数据进行汇总。
    结果:在2020年3月和2021年8月,10,229名患者接受了治疗,20276人接受心灵感应学治疗,4164人接受精神病学治疗,1,808人通过远程通信,2,356人通过远程通信,共访问6,312次。最常见的诊断是抑郁症(36.8%),焦虑(12.0%),和精神病(10.7%)障碍。受访者感到满意的是,超过93%的人会将其推荐给其他人。
    结论:LivingLab远程健康心理健康计划允许在COVID-19大流行的头两年中对安蒂奥基亚患有心理健康问题和疾病的患者进行护理,受益者的满意度很高。因此,它可以在精神保健中采用。
    BACKGROUND: A telehealth mental health programme was designed at the LivingLab of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia [University of Antioquia].
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and operation of the programme and evaluate the satisfaction of the patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021.
    METHODS: Descriptive study that details the development of the programme. Data were extracted from medical records to describe the patients who were treated. A satisfaction scale was applied to a random sample and the data were summarised with descriptive statistics.
    RESULTS: In March 2020 and August 2021, 10,229 patients were treated, with 20,276 treated by telepsychology and 4,164 by psychiatry, 1,808 by telepsychiatry and 2,356 by tele-expertise, with a total of 6,312 visits. The most frequent diagnoses were depressive (36.8%), anxiety (12.0%), and psychotic (10.7%) disorders. Respondents were satisfied to the point that more than 93% would recommend it to another person.
    CONCLUSIONS: The LivingLab telehealth mental health programme allowed for the care of patients with mental health problems and disorders in Antioquia during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there was a high degree of satisfaction among the beneficiaries. Therefore it could be adopted in mental health care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医学教育一直在变化,以及评估策略,这些策略不仅可以解决理论知识,还可以解决临床技能。在心理健康方面,这些技能起着核心作用。客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是可以评估临床技能的评估之一。本文介绍了自2015年OSCE引入以来本科生评估的实施和表现。
    方法:对实现进行了解释,以及在心理健康第二学期对本科生进行的OSCE的描述,使用那些年的最后实践考试的数据库。还描述了心理健康教师的看法。
    结果:2015-2年实施的精神卫生OSCE,是在大学模拟医院中开发的,有五个站(访谈,精神检查,诊断,对家庭和道德的治疗和信息)。在2016-2和2019-2之间,有486名学生参加了OSCE,平均得分为3.85(0-5级)。据观察,评估焦虑症时获得的等级低于平均水平,高于平均水平的情感障碍,而精神疾病的发病率在平均水平之内。教授们强调了多才多艺,实践和理论方面的综合客观评价,以及不同组之间比较的可能性。
    结论:OSCE是一项考试,为评估医学生的精神病学能力提供了可能性,并允许在教学学习过程中识别有待改进的方面。
    BACKGROUND: Medical education has been changing, and the evaluation strategies that make it possible to address not only theoretical knowledge but also clinical skills. In Mental Health, these skills play a central role. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is one of the evaluations that could assess clinical skills. This article describes the implementation and performance for the evaluation of undergraduate students since the OSCE\'s introduction in 2015.
    METHODS: An explanation of the implementation is made, and a description of the OSCEs carried out to undergraduate medical students in the second semester of mental health, using the databases of the final practical examinations during those years. The perception of mental health teachers is also described.
    RESULTS: The mental health OSCE implemented in 2015-2, is developed in the Simulated Hospital of the University and has five stations (interview, mental examination, diagnosis, treatment and information to the family and ethics). Between 2016-2 and 2019-2, 486 students performed OSCE with an average score of 3.85 (scale 0-5). It was observed that the grade obtained when evaluating anxiety disorders was below average, that of affective disorders above average, while that of psychotic disorders was within the average. The professors highlight the versatility, the comprehensive objective evaluation of the practical and theoretical aspects, and the possibility of comparison between the different groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The OSCE is an examination that provides the possibility to evaluate the competences in psychiatry of medical students and allows the identification of the aspects to be improved in the teaching learning process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Communimetric screening tools help clinicians identify and communicate their patient\'s areas of need and the corresponding level of action. However, few tools exist to identify mental health (MH) and developmental needs in young children. We aimed to implement and evaluate a new communimetric MH and developmental screening tool for children under 6 (HEADS-ED Under 6) in a community MH agency in Ontario, Canada. Using a prospective cohort design, we explored how intake workers used the HEADS-ED Under 6 screening tool from November 2019 to March 2021. 94.5% of children (n = 535/566) were screened with the HEADS-ED at intake. Total HEADS-ED scores and domains were used to inform the intensity of recommended services. Three clinical domains (Eating & sleeping, Development, speech/language/motor, and Emotions & behaviors) also independently predicted a priority recommendation. The tool showed good concordance with the InterRAI Early Years for children under 4 years old. The HEADS-ED Under 6 was a brief, easy, and valid screening tool, and can be used to identify important MH and developmental domains early, rate level of action/impairment, communicate severity of needs, and help determine intensity of service required.
    تساعد أدوات الفحص المجتمعي الأطباء الاكلينيكيين على تحديد مجالات احتياجات مرضاهم ومستوى التدخل المناسب. ومع ذلك، يوجد عدد قليل من الأدوات لتحديد احتياجات الصحة النفسية واحتياجات النمو لدى الأطفال الصغار. تهدف هذه الدراسة إلى تنفيذ وتقييم أداة فحص مجتمعية جديدة للصحة النفسية والنمو للأطفال دون سن السادسة ((HEADS‐ED في هيئة مجتمعية للصحة النفسية في أونتاريو، كندا. باستخدام تصميم المجموعة الاستطلاعية، استكشفنا كيف استخدم العاملون في الاستقبال أداة الفحص HEADS‐ED تحت سن 6 سنوات من نوفمبر 2019 إلى مارس 2021. تم فحص 94.5٪ من الأطفال (العدد = 535/566) باستخدام أداة HEADS‐ED عند الاستقبال. وتم استخدام مجموع درجات HEADS‐ED ومجالاته للإبلاغ عن كم الخدمات الموصى بها. كما تنبأت ثلاثة مجالات إكلينيكية (الأكل والنوم، والنمو/النطق/اللغة/الحركة، والعواطف والسلوكيات) بشكل مستقل بأولويات الخدمات الموصى بها. أظهرت الأداة تطابقًا جيدًا مع مؤشر (InterRAI) للسنوات المبكرة للأطفال دون سن 4 سنوات. كانت أداة HEADS‐ED لأقل من 6 سنوات أداة فحص مختصرة وسهلة وصحيحة، ويمكن استخدامها لتحديد مجالات الصحة النفسية والنمو المهمة في وقت مبكر، وتقييم مستوى الفعل/العجز، وتوضيح شدة الاحتياجات، والمساعدة في تحديد حجم الخدمة المطلوبة.
    “社区测量”筛查工具有助于临床医生识别和传达患者的需求领域及相应的行动水平。然而, 目前很少有工具能够识别幼儿的心理健康(MH)和发育需求。我们的目标是在加拿大安大略省的一家社区心理健康机构实施并评估一种新的针对6岁以下儿童的“社区测量”心理健康和发育筛查工具(针对6岁以下儿童的HEADS‐ED)。我们采用前瞻性队列设计, 研究了接诊工作人员在2019年11月至2021年3月期间, 如何使用针对6岁以下儿童的HEADS‐ED筛查工具。94.5%的儿童(n = 535/566)在接诊时使用HEADS‐ED进行了筛查。总的HEADS‐ED评分及各个领域评分被用于指导推荐服务的强度。三个临床领域(饮食与睡眠、发育/语言/运动、情绪与行为)也单独预测评估了优先推荐的需求。该工具与“InterRAI早期儿童版”(适用于4岁以下儿童)显示出良好的一致性。针对6岁以下儿童的HEADS‐ED是一种简便、易用且有效的筛查工具, 可用于早期识别重要的心理健康和发育领域问题、评估行动或损伤水平、传达需求的严重程度, 并有助于确定所需服务的强度。.
    Les outils de dépistage communimétrique aident les cliniciens à identifier et à communicer les besoins et le niveau d\'action correspondant de leur patient. Cependant il existe peu d\'outil pour identifier les besoins en Santé Mentale (SM en français) et les besoins développentaux chez les jeunes enfants. Nous nous sommes donné pour but d\'appliquer et d’évaluer un nouveal outil communimétrique de SM et développemental pour les enfants de moins de 6 ans (HEADS‐ED de moins de 6 ans) dans une agence communautaire de SM dans l\'Ontario au Canada. En utilisant une conception de cohorte prospective nous avons exploré la manière dont les préposés à l\'accueil ont utilisé le HEADS‐ED de moins de six ans de novembre 219 à mars 2021. 94,5% des enfants (n = 535‐566) ont été dépister avec le HEADS‐ED à l\'accueil. Tous les scores et domaines HEADS‐ED ont été utilisé pour éclairer l\'intensité des services recommandés. Trois domaines cliniques (Manger et dormir, Développement/parole/langage/moteur, et les Emotions, comportements ont aussi prédit une recommandation de priorité indépendamment. L\'outil a fait preuve d\'une bonne concordance avec le InterRAI Early Years pour les enfants de moins de 4 ans. Le HEADS‐ED de moins de 6 ans s\'est avéré être un outil de dépistage valide, bref et facile, et peut être utiliser pour identifier des domaines de SM et des domaines du développement importants tôt, d’évaluer un niveau d\'action/de dépréciation, de communiquer la sévérité de besoins, et aider à déterminer l\'intensité des services requis. Kommunimetrische Screening‐Instrumente helfen klinisch Tätigen dabei, die Bedürfnisse ihrer Patienten zu erkennen, zu kommunizieren und die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zu ergreifen. Es gibt jedoch nur wenige Instrumente welche die Bedürfnisse von Kleinkindern hinsichtlich ihrer psychischen Gesundheit und Entwicklung ermitteln. Unser Ziel war es, ein neues kommunimetrisches Screening‐Instrument für die psychische Gesundheit und Entwicklung von Kindern unter 6 Jahren (HEADS‐ED unter 6 Jahren) in einer kommunalen Einrichtung der psychischen Gesundheitsversorgung in Ontario, Kanada, einzuführen und zu evaluieren. In einer prospektiven Kohortenstudie untersuchten wir von November 2019 bis März 2021 wie die Mitarbeitenden der Einrichtung bei Aufnahmen das HEADS‐ED‐Screening‐Tool für Kinder unter 6 Jahren einsetzten. 94,5 % der Kinder (n = 535/566) wurden bei Aufnahme mit dem HEADS‐ED gescreent. Die HEADS‐ED‐Gesamtergebnisse und ‐Domänen wurden verwendet, um die Intensität der empfohlenen Gesundheitsleistungen zu bestimmen. Ebenfalls sagten drei klinische Domänen (Essen und Schlafen, Entwicklung/Sprechen/Sprache/Motorik und Emotionen/Verhaltensweisen) unabhängig voneinander eine prioritäre Empfehlung voraus. Das Instrument zeigte eine gute Übereinstimmung mit dem InterRAI Early Years für Kinder unter 4 Jahren. Das HEADS‐ED für Kinder unter 6 Jahren erwies sich als ein kurzes, einfaches und valides Screening‐Instrument, das eingesetzt werden kann, um frühzeitig wichtige Bereiche psychischer Gesundheit und Entwicklung zu identifizieren, das Ausmaß von Interventionen/Beeinträchtigungen einzuschätzen, die Stärke dahingehender Bedürfnisse mitzuteilen und die notwendige Intensität von Gesundheitsleistungen zu bestimmen. コミュニメトリックスクリーニングツールは、臨床医が患者の必要な領域とそれに対応する行動レベルを特定し、伝えるのに役立つ。しかし、幼児のメンタルヘルス(MH)と発達のニーズを特定するツールはほとんど存在しない。本研究は、カナダ・オンタリオ州の地域MH機関において、6歳未満児を対象とした新しいコミュニメトリックMHおよび発達スクリーニングツール(HEADS‐ED under 6)の導入および評価を目的とした。前向きコホートデザインを用いて、2019年11月から2021年3月に、インテイク担当者が6歳未満児スクリーニングツールHEADS‐EDをどのように使用したかを調査した。94.5%の子ども(n = 535/566)がインテーク時にHEADS‐EDでスクリーニングを受けた。HEADS‐EDの総スコアと領域は、推奨されるサービスの程度を知るために使用された。また、3つの臨床領域(食欲と睡眠、発達・発語・言語・運動、感情/行動)が、個別の優先順位を予測した。このツールは、4歳未満児を対象とするInterRAI Early Yearsと良好な一致を示した。HEADS‐ED Under 6は、簡潔で、簡単で、有効なスクリーニングツールであり、早期に重要な精神保健および発達領域を特定し、活動/障害のレベルを評価し、ニーズの重症度を伝え、必要なサービスの強度を決定するために使用することができる。.
    Las herramientas de examinación comunimétricas ayudan a los profesionales clínicos a identificar y comunicar las áreas de necesidad de sus pacientes y los niveles correspondientes de acción. Sin embargo, pocas herramientas existen para identificar la salud mental (MH) y las necesidades del desarrollo en niños pequeños. Nos propusimos implementar y evaluar una nueva herramienta comunimétrica de evaluación de salud mental (MH) y del desarrollo para niños menores de 6 años (HEADS‐ED para menores de 6) en una agencia de salud mental (MH) comunitaria en Ontario, Canadá. Usando un potencial diseño de grupo, exploramos cómo los trabajadores de admisión usaban la herramienta de evaluación HEADS‐ED para menores de 6, de noviembre de 2019 a marzo de 2021. 94.5% de los niños (n = 535/566) fueron evaluados con HEADS‐ED al momento de admisión. Se usaron los puntajes totales de HEADS‐ED y los dominios para determinar la intensidad de los servicios recomendados. Tres dominios clínicos (Comer y dormir, desarrollo/habla/lenguaje/movimiento, así como Emociones, comportamientos) también predijeron independientemente una recomendación prioritaria. La herramienta mostró buena concordancia con InterRAI en los Primeros Años para niños menores de 4 años. HEADS‐ED para menores de 6 fue una herramienta de evaluación breve, fácil y válida, y puede usarse para identificar tempranamente importantes dominios de salud mental (MH) y de desarrollo, clasificar el nivel de acción/daño, comunicar la severidad de las necesidades, así como ayudar a determinar la intensidad del servicio que se requiere.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究调查了整个乌克兰战争暴露对创伤后应激症状(PTSS)和睡眠障碍的影响。战争暴露的主观和客观指标被建模为这些症状的预测因子。方法:我们创建了两个预测因子:第一,我们使用政府和人群来源的数据为乌克兰21个非占领区中的每个地区创建了客观的战争暴露指数,根据空袭警报的数量,爆炸,靠近前线;第二,我们获得了自我报告的横截面数据,使用方便采样,来自全国范围内对战争引发的威胁的主观体验的调查(N=991)。调查还测量了PTSS和睡眠障碍的结果变量。分层多级回归模拟了这一客观战争暴露指数与两个结果变量的关系,在考虑人口统计后。最后的回归步骤将主观威胁建模为这些症状的预测因子。结果:我们观察到PTSS和睡眠障碍的水平强烈升高,客观和主观战争指标的区域差异很大。客观的战争暴露可以预测PTSS,但不能预测睡眠障碍,而主观威胁预测了两个症状域。结论:该研究证明了客观战争暴露数据对预测不同地区PTSS患病率的实用性。结果进一步强调了主观评估过程在PTSS和睡眠障碍的症状学中的突出作用,从而提供有关创伤相关疾病的理论。我们的结果可以通过确定受影响严重的地区来指导精神卫生服务的分配。
    乌克兰已经前瞻性地收集了有关空袭警报和爆炸的客观数据。我们将这些客观数据与大多数乌克兰地区991名响应者的症状报告相关联。客观数据可以解释创伤后压力的症状,但不能解释睡眠障碍。
    Objective: This study investigated the impact of war exposure on post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and sleep disturbance across Ukraine. Subjective and objective indicators of war exposure were modelled as predictors of these symptoms.Methods: We created two predictors: first, we used governmental and crowd-sourced data to create an objective war exposure index for each of the 21 non-occupied regions of Ukraine, based on the number of air raid alarms, explosions, and proximity to frontline; and second, we obtained self-report cross-sectional data, using convenience sampling, from a nation-wide survey (N = 991) on subjective experience of threat triggered by the war. The survey also measured the outcome variables of PTSS and sleep disturbance. Hierarchical multilevel regressions modelled the relationship of this objective war exposure index with the two outcome variables, after accounting for demographics. A final regression step modelled subjective threat as predictor of these symptoms.Results: We observed strongly elevated levels of PTSS and sleep disturbance and strong regional differences in objective and subjective war indicators. Objective war exposure predicted PTSS but not sleep disturbance, whereas subjective threat predicted both symptom domains.Conclusion: The study demonstrates the utility of objective war exposure data for predicting the prevalence of PTSS in the different regions. The results further underscore the prominent role of subjective appraisal processes in the symptomatology of PTSS and sleep disturbance, thus informing theories on trauma-related disorders. Our results can guide the allocation of mental health services by identifying highly affected regions.
    Objective data on air raid alarms and explosions have been prospectively collected in Ukraine.We related those objective data to symptom reports of 991 responders in most Ukraine regions.Objective data explained symptoms of post-traumatic stress but not sleep disturbance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:评估新的内部住院医师(IRP)对家庭和社区医学(FCM)以及专业和个人问题的意见。
    方法:对马德里地区837个新的IRP进行匿名调查。
    结果:平均年龄为25.6±3.5岁,525(62.7%)在医学院期间有FCM的特定科目,799人(95.5%)在他们的医学学位期间做过FCM实践,606人(72.4%)被认为与医疗居留期间在FCM的几个月有关。只有103人(12.3%)考虑在居留期间成为父母,416人(49.7%)患有焦虑症,99(11.8%)抑郁症,19人(2.3%)曾有过自杀念头。尽管638人(76.2%)接受了道德决策方面的培训,345(41.2%)不知道如何执行这些决定,120(14.3%)研究过人工智能,744(88.9%)对医师学院持积极看法。结论:马德里的大多数新医疗居民在培训期间考虑初级保健轮换,但只有63%的人完成了FCM的本科特定培训。总共有12%的人报告了以前的抑郁和一半的焦虑。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the opinions of the new internal resident physicians (IRP) on family and community medicine (FCM) and professional and personal issues.
    METHODS: Anonymous survey of 837 new IRPs in the Madrid Region.
    RESULTS: Mean age was 25.6±3.5 years, 525 (62.7%) had a specific subject of FCM during medical school, 799 (95.5%) did FCM practices during their medical degree, and 606 (72.4%) considered relevant to be some months in FCM during their medical residence. Only 103 (12.3%) consider becoming parents during residency, 416 (49.7%) have suffered from anxiety, 99 (11.8%) from depression, and 19 (2.3%) had previous suicidal thoughts. Although 638 (76.2%) have received training in ethical decisions, 345 (41.2%) did not know how to implement these decisions, 120 (14.3%) had studied artificial intelligence and 744 (88.9%) have a positive view of the College of Physicians. CONCLUSIóN: Most new medical residents of Madrid consider a Primary Care rotation relevant during their training, but only 63% have completed specific training in FCM as an undergraduate. A total of 12% reported previous depression and half anxiety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    今年是卡夫卡逝世100周年。通常在一般医学中,特别是内科,医生面临的情况是,他们将自己定位为与社会有关的患者的唯一保证人,以及它是如何设想这种疾病的。很多时候,患者在没有诊断或恐惧的情况下来到我们这里;有时也被他们的环境所拒绝。这个简短的文本解决了这个当前的主题,向这位杰出的作家和他最著名的作品致敬,变态.
    This year marks 100 years since the death of Franz Kafka. Often in general medicine, and internal medicine in particular, doctors face situations in which they position themselves as the only guarantor of the patient in relation to society and how it conceives the disease. Many times, patients come to us without a diagnosis or with the fear of it; sometimes also rejected by their environment. This short text addresses this current topic, paying tribute to the brilliant writer and his best-known work, Metamorphosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述COVID-19对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的社会心理健康的影响,脊柱关节炎(SpA),和系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)。
    方法:一系列风湿性疾病患者的纵向观察性研究。
    方法:主要结果指标是参与社会活动的能力受损,使用PROMIS-APS仪器ShortForm-8a测量。我们评估了各种环境中的社会活动,并进行了多变量分析,以研究COVID-19大流行期间社会参与恶化与相关因素之间的关系。
    结果:120例患者完成了前瞻性随访:40例AR(32%),42与SpA(33.6%),和43与SLE(34.4%)。总的来说,COVID-19大流行后记录的平均PROMIS得分较差:对社会角色的满意度(p=0.029),抑郁(p=0.039),和参与社会活动的能力(p=0.024)。与COVID-19大流行后参与社会活动能力相关的因素是年龄较大(β=-0.215;p=0.012),诊断为SLE(β=-0.203;p=0.015),抑郁(β=-0.295;p=0.003)和对社会角色的满意度(β=0.211;p=0.037)。
    结论:风湿性疾病患者在COVID-19大流行后参与社会活动的能力受到影响,尤其是在SLE。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of the COVID-19 on the psychosocial health of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
    METHODS: Longitudinal observational study of a series of patients with rheumatic disease.
    METHODS: The main outcome measure was impairment of the ability to participate in social activities, as measured using the PROMIS-APS instrument Short Form-8a. We evaluated social activities in various settings and performed a multivariate analysis to study the association between worsening of social participation during the COVID-19 pandemic and implicated factors.
    RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five patients had completed the prospective follow-up: 40 with AR (32%), 42 with SpA (33.6%), and 43 with SLE (34.4%). Overall, poorer mean PROMIS scores were recorded after the COVID-19 pandemic for: satisfaction with social roles (p=0.029), depression (p=0.039), and ability to participate in social activities (p=0.024). The factors associated with ability to participate in social activities after the COVID-19 pandemic were older age (β=-0.215; p=0.012), diagnosis of SLE (β=-0.203; p=0.015), depression (β=-0.295; p=0.003) and satisfaction with social roles (β=0.211; p=0.037).
    CONCLUSIONS: The ability to participate in social activities after the COVID-19 pandemic is affected in patients with rheumatic disease, especially in SLE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高血压是印度普遍存在的健康挑战,与抑郁症有双向联系。认识到高血压患者中抑郁症的患病率及其相关因素对于更好的健康结果很重要。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了全面搜索,Embase,Scopus,和谷歌学者数据库来确定相关研究。使用R软件进行分析,采用95%置信区间的随机效应模型。进行亚组分析以探索纳入研究中异质性的来源。
    结果:印度高血压患者中抑郁症的患病率为39.8%(95%CI:28.6;52.1)。尽管南部地区(44.7%)的患病率高于北部(26.9%),差异不显著(p=0.39)。使用不同评估量表和不同样本量的研究产生了相似的患病率。然而,时间趋势分析显示,2020年至2023年发表的研究(52.6%)的患病率高于2016年至2019年发表的研究(35.5%)(p=0.03).与抑郁症相关的主要因素包括较低的社会经济地位,教育水平低,女性性别,不受控制的高血压,和COVID-19相关因素。
    结论:相当比例的高血压患者患有抑郁症。因此,筛查高血压患者的抑郁症对于改善印度的高血压管理至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a prevalent health challenge in India, with a bidirectional link to depression. Recognizing the prevalence of depression among hypertensive patients and associated factors are important for better health outcomes.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies. R software was used for analysis, employing a random effects model with a 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analyses were done to explore sources of heterogeneity within the included studies.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of depression among hypertensive patients in India was 39.8% (95% CI: 28.6; 52.1). Despite a higher prevalence observed in South region (44.7%) compared to North (26.9%), the difference was not significant (p=0.39). Studies utilizing different assessment scales and varying sample sizes yielded similar prevalence. However, a temporal trend analysis indicated a higher prevalence in studies published between 2020 and 2023 (52.6%) compared to those published between 2016 and 2019 (35.5%) (p=0.03). Major factors associated with depression included lower socioeconomic status, low education level, female gender, uncontrolled hypertension, and COVID-19 related factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of hypertensive patients suffer from depression. Therefore, screening for depression in hypertensive patients is essential to improve hypertension management in India.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重症监护病房(ICU)入院和有创机械通气(IMV)与心理困扰和创伤有关。COVID-19大流行带来了一系列额外的持久压力和创伤经历。然而,对共病抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)知之甚少。目的:检查发生,共现,抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍的临床症状持续存在,以及它们的预测因素,在COVID-19危重病幸存者中。方法:对入住ICU≥24小时的COVID-19成年幸存者进行单中心前瞻性观察性研究。在ICU出院后1个月和12个月,使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表和戴维森创伤量表的抑郁量表对患者进行评估。分析了有和没有IMV的患者之间抑郁和PTSD的孤立和共病症状的差异,以及这些精神障碍症状的发生和持续存在的预测因素。结果:89例患者(42例患有IMV)完成了1个月的随访,71例(34例患有IMV)完成了12个月的随访。出院后一个月,29.2%的患者有抑郁症状,36%的患者有PTSD症状;一年后,分别为32.4%和31%。抑郁症和PTSD症状并存约占所有症状病例的一半。孤立的PTSD症状在IMV患者中更为常见(p≤0.014)。对IMV的需求与这两种精神障碍中任何一种的症状在一个月时的发生(OR=6.098,p=0.005)和在12个月时的持续(OR=3.271,p=0.030)相关。结论:在我们的COVID-19危重病幸存者队列中,共患抑郁症和PTSD症状非常常见。对IMV的需求预测了这些精神障碍症状的短期发生和长期持续,特别是PTSD症状。呼吸困难在IMV与ICU后精神障碍之间的关联中的具体作用值得进一步研究。试用注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04422444。
    COVID-19危重病幸存者的临床显着抑郁和创伤后应激障碍症状,特别是在接受有创机械通气的患者中,非常频繁,发生在出院后不久,并长期坚持。
    Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are associated with psychological distress and trauma. The COVID-19 pandemic brought with it a series of additional long-lasting stressful and traumatic experiences. However, little is known about comorbid depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Objective: To examine the occurrence, co-occurrence, and persistence of clinically significant symptoms of depression and PTSD, and their predictive factors, in COVID-19 critical illness survivors.Method: Single-centre prospective observational study in adult survivors of COVID-19 with ≥24 h of ICU admission. Patients were assessed one and 12 months after ICU discharge using the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Davidson Trauma Scale. Differences in isolated and comorbid symptoms of depression and PTSD between patients with and without IMV and predictors of the occurrence and persistence of symptoms of these mental disorders were analysed.Results: Eighty-nine patients (42 with IMV) completed the 1-month follow-up and 71 (34 with IMV) completed the 12-month follow-up. One month after discharge, 29.2% of patients had symptoms of depression and 36% had symptoms of PTSD; after one year, the respective figures were 32.4% and 31%. Coexistence of depressive and PTSD symptoms accounted for approximately half of all symptomatic cases. Isolated PTSD symptoms were more frequent in patients with IMV (p≤.014). The need for IMV was associated with the occurrence at one month (OR = 6.098, p = .005) and persistence at 12 months (OR = 3.271, p = .030) of symptoms of either of these two mental disorders.Conclusions: Comorbid depressive and PTSD symptoms were highly frequent in our cohort of COVID-19 critical illness survivors. The need for IMV predicted short-term occurrence and long-term persistence of symptoms of these mental disorders, especially PTSD symptoms. The specific role of dyspnea in the association between IMV and post-ICU mental disorders deserves further investigation.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04422444.
    Clinically significant depressive and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in survivors of COVID-19 critical illness, especially in patients who had undergone invasive mechanical ventilation, were highly frequent, occurred soon after discharge, and persisted over the long term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号