Salud mental

Salud 精神
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近,ICD-11和DSM-5-TR诊断手册中都包含了长期悲伤障碍(PGD)。研究其流行程度和跨文化相关性对于更有效的识别至关重要,治疗,和预防。目的:本研究旨在检查基于ICD-11的PGD的患病率,在斯洛伐克代表性样本中,以应对前一年发生的亲人死亡。进一步的目的是检查PGD症状的因素结构以及PGD项目评分和PGD“caseness”的相关性。方法:自报PGD数据,抑郁症,焦虑,酒精使用,和描述性特征是从斯洛伐克人口的代表性样本中收集的(N=319)。结果:数据来自N=1853人;319名参与者(17.2%)在过去一年中报告了损失。这些失去亲人的参与者中可能的PGD的患病率为1.99%,最近的损失(<6个月,n=151)和7.75%,对于更遥远的损失(6-12个月,n=130)。最常见的认可症状包括对死者的渴望/渴望,悲伤,否认/不现实,难以接受死亡。PGD症状具有单一的因子结构,这对于失去1-5个月和6-12个月的子样本是一致的。PGD的严重程度随亲属关系而变化。抑郁和焦虑,但不是酒精滥用,与PGD严重程度和PGD严重程度相关。结论:这些发现强调了大量的人在损失后6-12个月之间发展为PGD。这强调了有针对性的心理干预的必要性。
    长期悲伤障碍(PGD)新纳入ICD-11,迫切需要了解其在普通人群中的患病率和相关性。在一个代表性的斯洛伐克样本中(N=1853),319人(17.2%)在过去一年中报告了损失;7.75%的人,6-12个月前丧亲,符合基于ICD-11的PGD标准。PGD的严重程度和caseness与亲属关系(但与其他社会人口统计学和损失特征不那么强烈)以及抑郁和焦虑(但与有问题的饮酒不太强烈)相关。损失后6-12个月,PGD在普通人群中似乎相当普遍,及时识别和缓解PGD是一个重要的公共卫生问题。
    Background: Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) has recently been included in both the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR diagnostic manuals. Studying its prevalence and correlates across cultures is vital for more effective identification, treatment, and prevention.Objective: This study aimed to examine prevalence rates of ICD-11-based PGD, in a representative Slovakian sample in response to deaths of loved ones occurring during the previous year. Further aims were to examine the factor structure of PGD symptoms and correlates of summed PGD item scores and PGD \'caseness\'.Method: Self-reported data on PGD, depression, anxiety, alcohol use, and descriptive characteristics were gathered from a representative sample of the Slovak population (N = 319).Results: Data were gathered from N = 1853 people; 319 participants (17.2%) reported a loss in the past year. The prevalence of probable PGD among these bereaved participants was 1.99% for recent losses (<6 months, n = 151) and 7.75% for more distant losses (6-12 months, n = 130). The most frequently endorsed symptoms included longing/yearning for the deceased, sadness, denial/unrealness, and difficulty accepting the death. PGD symptoms had a unitary factor structure which was consistent for subsamples bereaved 1-5 and 6-12 months. The severity of PGD varied with kinship. Depression and anxiety, but not alcohol misuse, were associated with PGD severity and PGD caseness.Conclusions: These findings underscore that a significant group of people develop PGD between 6-12 months following a loss. This emphasises the need for targeted psychological interventions.
    Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is newly included in ICD-11 and knowledge about its prevalence and correlates in the general population is urgently needed.In a representative Slovakian sample (N = 1853), 319 people (17.2%) reported a loss during the past year; 7.75% of people, bereaved 6–12 months earlier, met criteria for ICD-11-based PGD.PGD severity and caseness were associated with kinship (but less strongly with other sociodemographic and loss characteristics) and with depression and anxiety (but less strongly with problematic alcohol use).At 6–12 months following loss, PGD seems fairly common in the general population and timely identification and mitigation of PGD is an important public health issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究调查了整个乌克兰战争暴露对创伤后应激症状(PTSS)和睡眠障碍的影响。战争暴露的主观和客观指标被建模为这些症状的预测因子。方法:我们创建了两个预测因子:第一,我们使用政府和人群来源的数据为乌克兰21个非占领区中的每个地区创建了客观的战争暴露指数,根据空袭警报的数量,爆炸,靠近前线;第二,我们获得了自我报告的横截面数据,使用方便采样,来自全国范围内对战争引发的威胁的主观体验的调查(N=991)。调查还测量了PTSS和睡眠障碍的结果变量。分层多级回归模拟了这一客观战争暴露指数与两个结果变量的关系,在考虑人口统计后。最后的回归步骤将主观威胁建模为这些症状的预测因子。结果:我们观察到PTSS和睡眠障碍的水平强烈升高,客观和主观战争指标的区域差异很大。客观的战争暴露可以预测PTSS,但不能预测睡眠障碍,而主观威胁预测了两个症状域。结论:该研究证明了客观战争暴露数据对预测不同地区PTSS患病率的实用性。结果进一步强调了主观评估过程在PTSS和睡眠障碍的症状学中的突出作用,从而提供有关创伤相关疾病的理论。我们的结果可以通过确定受影响严重的地区来指导精神卫生服务的分配。
    乌克兰已经前瞻性地收集了有关空袭警报和爆炸的客观数据。我们将这些客观数据与大多数乌克兰地区991名响应者的症状报告相关联。客观数据可以解释创伤后压力的症状,但不能解释睡眠障碍。
    Objective: This study investigated the impact of war exposure on post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and sleep disturbance across Ukraine. Subjective and objective indicators of war exposure were modelled as predictors of these symptoms.Methods: We created two predictors: first, we used governmental and crowd-sourced data to create an objective war exposure index for each of the 21 non-occupied regions of Ukraine, based on the number of air raid alarms, explosions, and proximity to frontline; and second, we obtained self-report cross-sectional data, using convenience sampling, from a nation-wide survey (N = 991) on subjective experience of threat triggered by the war. The survey also measured the outcome variables of PTSS and sleep disturbance. Hierarchical multilevel regressions modelled the relationship of this objective war exposure index with the two outcome variables, after accounting for demographics. A final regression step modelled subjective threat as predictor of these symptoms.Results: We observed strongly elevated levels of PTSS and sleep disturbance and strong regional differences in objective and subjective war indicators. Objective war exposure predicted PTSS but not sleep disturbance, whereas subjective threat predicted both symptom domains.Conclusion: The study demonstrates the utility of objective war exposure data for predicting the prevalence of PTSS in the different regions. The results further underscore the prominent role of subjective appraisal processes in the symptomatology of PTSS and sleep disturbance, thus informing theories on trauma-related disorders. Our results can guide the allocation of mental health services by identifying highly affected regions.
    Objective data on air raid alarms and explosions have been prospectively collected in Ukraine.We related those objective data to symptom reports of 991 responders in most Ukraine regions.Objective data explained symptoms of post-traumatic stress but not sleep disturbance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重症监护病房(ICU)入院和有创机械通气(IMV)与心理困扰和创伤有关。COVID-19大流行带来了一系列额外的持久压力和创伤经历。然而,对共病抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)知之甚少。目的:检查发生,共现,抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍的临床症状持续存在,以及它们的预测因素,在COVID-19危重病幸存者中。方法:对入住ICU≥24小时的COVID-19成年幸存者进行单中心前瞻性观察性研究。在ICU出院后1个月和12个月,使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表和戴维森创伤量表的抑郁量表对患者进行评估。分析了有和没有IMV的患者之间抑郁和PTSD的孤立和共病症状的差异,以及这些精神障碍症状的发生和持续存在的预测因素。结果:89例患者(42例患有IMV)完成了1个月的随访,71例(34例患有IMV)完成了12个月的随访。出院后一个月,29.2%的患者有抑郁症状,36%的患者有PTSD症状;一年后,分别为32.4%和31%。抑郁症和PTSD症状并存约占所有症状病例的一半。孤立的PTSD症状在IMV患者中更为常见(p≤0.014)。对IMV的需求与这两种精神障碍中任何一种的症状在一个月时的发生(OR=6.098,p=0.005)和在12个月时的持续(OR=3.271,p=0.030)相关。结论:在我们的COVID-19危重病幸存者队列中,共患抑郁症和PTSD症状非常常见。对IMV的需求预测了这些精神障碍症状的短期发生和长期持续,特别是PTSD症状。呼吸困难在IMV与ICU后精神障碍之间的关联中的具体作用值得进一步研究。试用注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04422444。
    COVID-19危重病幸存者的临床显着抑郁和创伤后应激障碍症状,特别是在接受有创机械通气的患者中,非常频繁,发生在出院后不久,并长期坚持。
    Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are associated with psychological distress and trauma. The COVID-19 pandemic brought with it a series of additional long-lasting stressful and traumatic experiences. However, little is known about comorbid depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Objective: To examine the occurrence, co-occurrence, and persistence of clinically significant symptoms of depression and PTSD, and their predictive factors, in COVID-19 critical illness survivors.Method: Single-centre prospective observational study in adult survivors of COVID-19 with ≥24 h of ICU admission. Patients were assessed one and 12 months after ICU discharge using the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Davidson Trauma Scale. Differences in isolated and comorbid symptoms of depression and PTSD between patients with and without IMV and predictors of the occurrence and persistence of symptoms of these mental disorders were analysed.Results: Eighty-nine patients (42 with IMV) completed the 1-month follow-up and 71 (34 with IMV) completed the 12-month follow-up. One month after discharge, 29.2% of patients had symptoms of depression and 36% had symptoms of PTSD; after one year, the respective figures were 32.4% and 31%. Coexistence of depressive and PTSD symptoms accounted for approximately half of all symptomatic cases. Isolated PTSD symptoms were more frequent in patients with IMV (p≤.014). The need for IMV was associated with the occurrence at one month (OR = 6.098, p = .005) and persistence at 12 months (OR = 3.271, p = .030) of symptoms of either of these two mental disorders.Conclusions: Comorbid depressive and PTSD symptoms were highly frequent in our cohort of COVID-19 critical illness survivors. The need for IMV predicted short-term occurrence and long-term persistence of symptoms of these mental disorders, especially PTSD symptoms. The specific role of dyspnea in the association between IMV and post-ICU mental disorders deserves further investigation.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04422444.
    Clinically significant depressive and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in survivors of COVID-19 critical illness, especially in patients who had undergone invasive mechanical ventilation, were highly frequent, occurred soon after discharge, and persisted over the long term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着武装冲突变得越来越复杂,儿童在不同角色中参与武装暴力的情况正在上升。因此,军事人员在部署期间更有可能遇到儿童。然而,对与部署有关的儿童遭遇及其对军事人员和退伍军人心理健康的影响知之甚少。目标:这项研究定性地检查了与儿童部署相关的遭遇的性质和影响。方法:我们对16名加拿大武装部队退伍军人进行了半结构化访谈,获取有关部署时儿童遭遇性质的丰富信息,这些相遇的心理-社会-精神影响,以及对支持的看法。采用专题分析法对访谈笔录进行分析。结果:确定了六个主要主题:相遇类型(即与儿童有关的与部署有关的相遇的事实方面),背景因素(即任务的各个方面,环境,以及与遭遇经历相关的个人背景),对相遇的评估(即与相遇相关的感官或感官体验),遭遇的影响(即心理社会,存在主义,和职业影响),部署过程中和部署后的应对策略,和支持经验,描述正式和非正式的支持来源。结论:与儿童的相遇是多种多样的,压力很大,导致与心理健康相关的影响,包括心理和道德困扰,和身份上的困难,灵性,和关系。这些影响是由评估之间复杂的相互作用引起的,对道德的期望,文化规范,和专业职责,并被各种个人因素放大(例如儿童虐待史,父母身份),毫无准备的感觉,缺乏部署后支持。对预防的影响,干预,和政策进行了讨论,目的是为今后保护和支持军事人员的努力提供信息。
    与部署相关的儿童接触会产生不同的影响,包括心理和道德困扰,随着身份的破坏,灵性,和人际关系。在军事部署期间遇到儿童的情况多种多样,压力很大,以道德评价和期望之间复杂的相互作用为特征,文化规范,和专业职责。强调对与儿童相遇没有准备的感觉突出了今后需要努力保护和支持面临这种情况的军事人员。
    Background: As armed conflict grows increasingly complex, the involvement of children in armed violence across diverse roles is rising. Consequently, military personnel are more likely to encounter children during deployment. However, little is known about deployment-related encounters with children and their impact on the mental health of military personnel and Veterans.Objective: This study qualitatively examines the nature and impacts of deployment-related encounters with children.Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 Canadian Armed Forces Veterans, eliciting rich information on the nature of child encounters on deployment, the psycho-social-spiritual impacts of these encounters, and perceptions of support. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.Results: Six primary themes were identified: types of encounters (i.e. factual aspects of deployment-related encounters with children), contextual factors (i.e. aspects of the mission, environment, and personal context relevant to one\'s experience of the encounter), appraisals of encounters (i.e. sensory or sense-making experiences relevant to the encounter), impacts of encounters (i.e. psycho-social, existential, and occupational impacts), coping strategies engaged in both during and after deployment, and support experiences, describing both formal and informal sources of support.Conclusions: Encounters with children are diverse and highly stressful, resulting in impacts pertinent to mental health, including psychological and moral distress, and difficulties with identity, spirituality, and relationships. These impacts are prompted by complex interactions among appraisals, expectations of morality, cultural norms, and professional duties and are amplified by various personal factors (e.g. childhood maltreatment history, parenthood), feelings of unpreparedness, and lack of post-deployment support. Implications for prevention, intervention, and policy are discussed with the aim of informing future efforts to safeguard and support military personnel facing a high likelihood of encounters with children.
    Deployment-related encounters with children result in diverse impacts, including psychological and moral distress, along with disruptions in identity, spirituality, and interpersonal relationships.Encounters with children during military deployments are diverse and highly stressful, characterized by complex interactions among appraisals and expectations of morality, cultural norms, and professional duties.Emphasis on feeling unprepared for encounters with children highlights the need for future efforts to safeguard and support military personnel facing such situations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    心理健康(MH)和女性生殖器切割(FGM)是移民健康的两个方面,应在初级保健中加以解决和筛查。这些话题本来就很敏感,在例行磋商中经常具有挑战性和难以接近。提供全面的护理和管理需要知识和谨慎的方法,然而,这些因素有时可能导致对这两种健康问题的筛查率较低。迁移本身并不固有地导致MH障碍。然而,在整个迁移过程中遇到的各种经验可能会导致MH挑战。移民与其他人口面临同样的问题,但是他们的表达可能不同。因此,重要的是要了解文化背景,并在医疗保健领域创造支持性环境,以有效解决MH和FGM问题。切割女性生殖器官对女孩和妇女来说是一个严重的健康问题,应该在初级保健中进行评估。这包括预防处于危险中的女孩,支持和照顾受影响的妇女和社区倡议。与来自高风险国家的个人接触,男性和女性对于促进变革和帮助结束这种有害的做法都至关重要。
    Mental Health (MH) and Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) are two aspects of migrant health that should be addressed and screened in primary care. These topics are inherently sensitive, often challenging and difficult to approach in routine consultations. Providing comprehensive care and management needs both knowledge and a careful approach, yet these factors may sometimes result in low screening of both health issues. Migration itself does not inherently lead to MH disorders. However, the various experiences encountered throughout the migration process can contribute to MH challenges. Migrants face the same issues as the rest of the population, but their expressions may differ. Therefore, it is important to understand the cultural contexts and create a supportive environment within healthcare to effectively address both MH and FGM. FGM is a serious health issue for girls and women that should be assessed in primary care. This includes prevention for at-risk girls, support and care for affected women and community initiatives. To engage with individuals from high-risk countries, both men and women is essential to facilitate change and help to end this harmful practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:22q11缺失综合征(22q11DS)是最常见的微缺失综合征,具有广泛的表型变异性,导致显著的发病率和一些死亡率。与22q11DS相关的各种健康问题以及整个生命周期中不断发展的表型(医学和发育/行为)可能会强烈影响患者及其护理人员的心理健康。像其他慢性病儿童的看护人一样,22q11DS儿童的照顾者可能会经历创伤和心理健康症状的风险增加.目的:该研究的主要目的是评估22q11DS儿童母亲的创伤经历和心理健康症状的频率。次要目标是将他们的创伤经历与患有其他神经发育障碍(NDD)的儿童的母亲的创伤经历进行比较。方法:共有71名被诊断为22q11DS的儿童母亲完成了有关其心理健康症状和创伤经历的在线调查。描述性统计数据用于总结其心理健康症状和创伤经历的患病率。使用Logistic回归模型来比较22q11DS儿童母亲与335名其他神经发育障碍(NDD)儿童母亲的创伤经历。结果:许多22q11DS儿童的母亲经历了临床上明显的心理健康症状,包括抑郁症(39%),焦虑(25%),和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状(30%)。患有22q11DS的儿童的母亲所经历的创伤事件类型与患有其他NDD的儿童的母亲所经历的创伤事件类型不同,因为他们更有可能观察到他们的孩子正在接受医疗程序,危及生命的手术,或者和他们的孩子一起住在重症监护室.结论:22q11DS护理人员可能需要心理健康支持和创伤知情护理,与其他NDDS儿童的照顾者相比,他们经历了不同类型的创伤事件,因此适合该人群的特定需求。
    22q11DS儿童的母亲经历了临床上显著的抑郁水平,焦虑,PTSD患有22q11DS的儿童的母亲经历了许多不同的创伤,特别是与孩子的医疗干预有关。22q11DS儿童的母亲所经历的创伤事件类型不同于其他神经发育障碍儿童的母亲。
    Background: 22q11 Deletion Syndrome (22q11DS) is the most common microdeletion syndrome with broad phenotypic variability, leading to significant morbidity and some mortality. The varied health problems associated with 22q11DS and the evolving phenotype (both medical and developmental/behavioural) across the lifespan can strongly impact the mental health of patients as well as their caregivers. Like caregivers of children with other chronic diseases, caregivers of children with 22q11DS may experience an increased risk of traumatisation and mental health symptoms.Objective: The study\'s primary objective was to assess the frequency of traumatic experiences and mental health symptoms among mothers of children with 22q11DS. The secondary objective was to compare their traumatic experiences to those of mothers of children with other neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).Method: A total of 71 mothers of children diagnosed with 22q11DS completed an online survey about their mental health symptoms and traumatic experiences. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the prevalence of their mental health symptoms and traumatic experiences. Logistic regression models were run to compare the traumatic experiences of mothers of children with 22q11DS to those of 335 mothers of children with other neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).Results: Many mothers of children with 22q11DS experienced clinically significant mental health symptoms, including depression (39%), anxiety (25%), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (30%). The types of traumatic events experienced by mothers of children with 22q11DS differed from those of mothers of children with other NDDs as they were more likely to observe their child undergoing a medical procedure, a life-threatening surgery, or have been with their child in the intensive care unit.Conclusion: 22q11DS caregivers are likely to require mental health support and trauma-informed care, tailored to the specific needs of this population as they experience different kinds of traumatic events compared to caregivers of children with other NDDS.
    Mothers of children with 22q11DS experience clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, and PTSD.Mothers of children with 22q11DS experience many and diverse trauma particularly related to medical interventions of their child.The types of traumatic events experienced by mothers of children with 22q11DS are different from those of the mothers of children with other neurodevelopmental disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行引起了多种应激源,可能导致调整障碍的症状。目的:我们纵向检查风险和保护因素之间的关系,COVID-19大流行期间与大流行相关的应激源和适应障碍的症状,以及这些关系是否因评估时间而异。方法:欧洲创伤应激研究协会(ESTSS)ADJUST研究包括N=15,169名18岁及以上的参与者。从2020年6月至2022年1月,以6个月的间隔招募来自11个欧洲国家的参与者并进行了3次筛查。风险和保护因素(如性别)之间的关联,压力源(例如对感染的恐惧),和调整障碍的症状(AjD,使用混合线性回归检查了ADNM-8)及其与评估时间的相互作用。结果:以下预测因素与较高的AjD症状水平显着相关:女性或不同性别;年龄;与大流行相关的新闻消费>每天30分钟;当前或以前的心理健康障碍;大流行之前或期间的创伤暴露;好,令人满意或不良的健康状况(vs.非常好);与政府危机管理和沟通有关的负担;对感染的恐惧;有限的社会接触;与工作有关的问题;活动受限;住房条件困难。以下预测因素与较低的AjD水平相关:自营职业或退休;在医疗保健领域工作;每周与亲人或朋友面对面接触≥一次。在大流行过程中,以下预测因素对AjD症状的影响因评估时间而异:当前或以前的精神障碍;与政府危机管理有关的负担;收入减少;以及当前的创伤暴露。结论:我们确定了在大流行的不同阶段预测AjD症状水平的风险因素和压力源。对于一些预测因子,在大流行的不同阶段,对心理健康的影响可能会发生变化。
    我们纵向检查了COVID-19大流行期间15,563名成年人的调整障碍症状的预测因素。我们发现了压力源,风险,以及在大流行的不同阶段预测调整障碍症状水平的保护因素。对于一些预测因子,在大流行的不同阶段,影响似乎会发生变化。
    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused multiple stressors that may lead to symptoms of adjustment disorder.Objective: We longitudinally examined relationships between risk and protective factors, pandemic-related stressors and symptoms of adjustment disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as whether these relationships differed by the time of assessment.Method: The European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS) ADJUST Study included N = 15,169 participants aged 18 years and above. Participants from 11 European countries were recruited and screened three times at 6-month intervals from June 2020 to January 2022. Associations between risk and protective factors (e.g. gender), stressors (e.g. fear of infection), and symptoms of adjustment disorder (AjD, ADNM-8) and their interaction with time of assessment were examined using mixed linear regression.Results: The following predictors were significantly associated with higher AjD symptom levels: female or diverse gender; older age; pandemic-related news consumption >30 min a day; a current or previous mental health disorder; trauma exposure before or during the pandemic; a good, satisfactory or poor health status (vs. very good); burden related to governmental crisis management and communication; fear of infection; restricted social contact; work-related problems; restricted activity; and difficult housing conditions. The following predictors were associated with lower AjD levels: self-employment or retirement; working in healthcare; and face-to-face contact ≥ once a week with loved ones or friends. The effects of the following predictors on AjD symptoms differed by the time of assessment in the course of the pandemic: a current or previous mental disorder; burden related to governmental crisis management; income reduction; and a current trauma exposure.Conclusions: We identified risk factors and stressors predicting AjD symptom levels at different stages of the pandemic. For some predictors, the effects on mental health may change at different stages of a pandemic.
    We longitudinally examined predictors of symptoms of adjustment disorder in 15,563 adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.We found stressors, risk, and protective factors predicting adjustment disorder symptom levels at different stages of the pandemic.For some predictors, the effects appear to change in different phases of a pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究表明,来自刚果民主共和国(DRC)的难民,尤其是女性,与受冲突影响人群的全球标准相比,心理健康问题的发生率更高。目的:本研究旨在通过检查特定风险(创伤暴露,适应挑战,和歧视)和保护因素(婚姻状况,识字,和社会资源)与创伤后应激症状(PTSS)和抑郁症有关。方法:采用系统随机抽样,我们调查了667名成年难民(370名女性,297名男性)在乌干达西部的KyakaII难民定居点。进行了多组路径分析,最初允许性别之间的差异,随后比较约束模型,其中路径设置为各组相等。结果:无约束模型对数据有很好的拟合效果。当路径设置为各组相等时,模型拟合度的下降,通过卡方差分检验证实,表明男性和女性模型的差异。使用一系列Z测试来比较各个路径。经历歧视是男性抑郁的更大风险因素,而强奸史与女性抑郁症的相关性更强。识字和定居点中的社会群体成员是男性抑郁的更强保护因素,而与伴侣生活在一起,感受到与社区的联系对女性来说更为重要。风险和保护因素与PTSS之间的关联在各组之间更为相似,只有一个群体中的成员显著受性别的影响;群体成员对男性的影响更大.结论:结果突出了刚果男女难民的痛苦预测因素的异同,并指出了调整计划以对性别敏感的潜在途径。
    这项研究发现了具体的创伤经历和社会因素如何与刚果男女难民的心理困扰相关的关键差异。强调需要量身定制的支持策略。研究表明,虽然歧视是男性抑郁的更强预测因素,强奸的经历与女性抑郁的关系更为密切。相反,文化和团体成员资格等社会因素为男性提供了更多的保护,而关系地位和社区联系对女性更有保护作用。研究结果揭示了对性别敏感的心理健康和社会心理支持干预的重要性。
    Background: Research indicates refugees from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), particularly females, have a higher incidence of mental health problems compared to the global norm for conflict-affected populations.Objective: This study aimed to unpack gender differences in the mental health of Congolese refugees by examining specific risk (trauma exposure, adaptation challenges, and discrimination) and protective factors (marital status, literacy, and social resources) in relation to posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and depression. Method: Utilizing systematic random sampling, we surveyed 667 adult refugees (370 females, 297 males) in the Kyaka II refugee settlement in Western Uganda. A multi-group path analysis was conducted, initially allowing for variance between genders and subsequently comparing a constrained model, where paths were set equal across groups.Results: The unconstrained model presented an excellent fit to the data. When paths were set to be equal across groups, the decline in model fit, confirmed by a chi-square difference test, indicated differences in the model for males and females. A series of Z-tests were used to compare individual paths. Experiencing discrimination was a stronger risk factor for depression among men, whereas a history of rape was more strongly associated with depression for females. Being literate and a member of a social group in the settlement were stronger protective factors for depression among men, whereas living with a partner and a felt sense of connection to their community was more important for women. Associations between risk and protective factors and PTSS were more similar across groups, only membership in a group was significantly moderated by gender; with group membership being more impactful for males.Conclusion: The results highlight similarities and differences in predictors of distress for male and female Congolese refugees and point to potential avenues for tailoring programming to be gender sensitive.
    This research identified key differences in how specific traumatic experiences and social factors correlate with psychological distress for male and female Congolese refugees, underscoring the need for tailored support strategies.The study reveals that while discrimination is a stronger predictor of depression in men, experiences of rape are more closely linked to depression in women. Conversely, social factors like literacy and group membership offer more protection to men, whereas relationship status and community connection are more protective for women.The findings shed light on the importance of gender-sensitive mental health and psychosocial support interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:童年的逆境会对身心健康产生持久的负面影响。这项研究通过描述注册精神卫生保健的青少年中与不良童年经历(ACE)相关的患病率和心理健康结果,为现有文献做出了贡献。方法:这项横断面研究的参与者是年轻人(12-18岁),他们被转诊到荷兰的门诊精神科。从医疗记录中收集人口统计信息。使用儿童创伤筛查问卷(CTSQ)检查ACE的存在和创伤后应激症状(PTSS)。评估心理健康问题,我们用荷兰语翻译的《青年自我报告》。描述性统计和频率用于计算各种ACE领域的患病率。采用方差分析和卡方检验探讨ACE与心理健康的关系。结果:在1373名参与者中,69.1%的人报告经历过至少一次ACE,17.1%的人表示一生中接触过四种或更多ACE。尽管所有ACE类别之间存在大量重叠,最常报告的是欺凌(49.2%),精神虐待(17.8%),身体虐待(12.2%),和性虐待(10.1%)。女性青少年(72.7%)报告的ACE明显多于男性青少年(27.0%)。此外,较高数量的ACE与更多的自我报告的一般心理健康问题相关,情绪和创伤后应激障碍的患病率升高,和更多的存在两个或更多共存的精神病诊断(共病精神病分类)。结论:这项关于儿童逆境及其与心理健康关系的横断面研究表明,ACE在注册精神保健的年轻人中非常普遍。这项研究为儿童逆境与心理健康问题之间的分级和累积关系提供了支持。
    这项研究调查了注册精神卫生保健的荷兰青年中不良童年经历和相关心理健康问题的患病率。十分之七的患者报告说曾遭受童年逆境,十分之二的患者报告暴露于四种或更多的不良童年经历。结果表明,儿童逆境与心理健康问题之间存在显着关联。数据分析显示不良童年经历的累积效应,这意味着报告暴露于更多儿童逆境的患者也表现出更严重的内化和外化心理健康问题,创伤后应激障碍和情绪障碍诊断的显著增加,精神病合并症普遍增加。
    Background: Childhood adversity can have lasting negative effects on physical and mental health. This study contributes to the existing literature by describing the prevalence rates and mental health outcomes related to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among adolescents registered for mental health care.Methods: Participants in this cross-sectional study were youths (aged 12-18 years) who were referred to outpatient psychiatric departments in the Netherlands. Demographic information was collected from the medical records. The Child Trauma Screening Questionnaire (CTSQ) was used to examine the presence of ACEs and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). To assess mental health problems, we used the Dutch translation of the Youth Self Report. Descriptive statistics and frequencies were used to calculate prevalence rates across the various ACEs domains. ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to explore the relationship between ACEs and mental health.Results: Of the 1373 participants, 69.1% reported having experienced at least one ACE and 17.1% indicated exposure to four or more ACEs in their lives. Although there was substantial overlap among all ACE categories, the most frequently reported were bullying (49.2%), emotional abuse (17.8%), physical abuse (12.2%), and sexual abuse (10.1%). Female adolescents (72.7%) reported significantly more ACEs than their male counterparts (27.0%). Furthermore, a higher number of ACEs was associated with significantly more self-reported general mental health problems, an elevated prevalence of both mood and post-traumatic stress disorders, and a greater presence of two or more co-existing psychiatric diagnoses (comorbid psychiatric classification).Conclusions: This cross-sectional study on childhood adversity and its association with mental health showed that ACEs are highly prevalent in youth registered for mental health care. This study provides support for a graded and cumulative relationship between childhood adversity and mental health problems.
    This study investigated the prevalence of adverse childhood experiences and associated mental health problems among Dutch youth registered for mental health care. Almost seven out of ten patients reported having been exposed to childhood adversity, and two out of ten patients reported exposure to four or more adverse childhood experiences.The results indicated a significant association between exposure to childhood adversity and mental health problems.Analysis of the data showed a cumulative effect of adverse childhood experiences, meaning that patients who reported exposure to more childhood adversity also showed more severe internalizing and externalizing mental health problems, a significant increase in both posttraumatic stress disorder and mood disorder diagnoses, and a general increase in psychiatric comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要对法国的非法语移民进行可行性研究,以告知适当的社会心理干预程序的适应。目标:测试针对巴黎大都市地区讲阿拉伯语的移民的WHO问题管理加(PM)干预方案。方法:在2019年至2021年之间,我们从三个住宿中心招募了参与者,这些中心接收了经历社会和经济困难的寻求庇护者或移民。经历心理困扰的参与者与训练有素的助手进行了五次PM+会议。通过与8名参与者的15次访谈评估了可行性,4帮助者,和3名学习主管。面试主题涵盖了PM+的一般实施和每个组件。我们还试图了解交付问题,并收集改进建议。使用演绎方法对数据进行主题分析。结果:我们发现PM+的实施是可行的,参与者主要有积极的反应,助手和研究人员。所有干预成分都被认为是有益的,呼吸练习被认为易于实施且经常持续。选择问题和解决问题的策略被描述为具有挑战性的执行。该计划的主要优势是来自助手的心理社会支持和与助手的融洽以及使用母语。然而,我们观察到在某些情况下需要补充或更高强度的心理支持。调查结果还强调了解决提供PM+的非专业助手中的困扰的重要性。最后,建议在协议中增加对社会资源的地方指导。结论:PM+是受欢迎且可行的,随着文化调整和增加移民获得社区资源的机会。
    世界卫生组织的问题管理加(PM+)干预被认为是一个可行的和可接受的干预措施,在巴黎大都市地区讲阿拉伯语的移民,参与者报告改善了心理健康结果和对该计划的满意度。该计划的主要优势是来自非专业助手的心理社会支持和融洽关系以及使用母语。这项研究记录了在范围和长度上扩大PM+的感知好处,建议需要为非专业助手提供额外的心理健康服务,并强调在向面临社会和经济困难的寻求庇护者或移民提供心理健康服务时考虑文化和语言因素的重要性。
    ABSTRACTBackground: Feasibility studies with non-French speaking migrants in France are needed to inform appropriate adaptation of psychosocial intervention procedures.Objective: To test the WHO Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention protocol for Arabic-speaking migrants in the Paris metropolitan region.Methods: Between 2019 and 2021 we recruited participants from three accommodation centres receiving asylum seekers or migrants experiencing social and economic difficulties. Participants experiencing psychological distress underwent five PM + sessions with trained helpers. Feasibility was evaluated through 15 interviews with 8 participants, 4 helpers, and 3 study supervisors. Interview topics covered PM + implementation in general and for each component. We also sought to understand problems with delivery and gathered suggestions for improvement. Data were analysed thematically using a deductive approach.Results: We found implementation of PM + to be feasible, with predominantly positive reactions from participants, helpers and study staff. All intervention components were considered beneficial, with breathing exercises considered easy to implement and often sustained. Selection of problems and strategies to address them were described as challenging to execute. Psychosocial support from and rapport with helpers and the use of the native language were considered key strengths of the programme. However, we observed the need for complementary or higher intensity psychological support in some cases. Findings also highlighted the importance of addressing distress among non-specialist helpers delivering PM + . Finally, local guidance to social resources were suggested to be added in the protocol.Conclusion: PM + was well-liked and feasible, with cultural adjustments and increased access to community resources for migrants needed.
    The World Health Organization Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention was found to be a feasible and acceptable intervention for Arabic-speaking migrants in the Paris metropolitan region, with participants reporting improved mental health outcomes and satisfaction with the programme.The features of psychosocial support from and rapport with non-specialist helpers delivering PM + and the use of the native language were considered key strengths of the programme.The study documented perceived benefits of expanding PM + in scope and length, suggests the need for additional mental health services for non-specialist helpers, and highlights the importance of considering cultural and linguistic factors when providing mental health services to asylum seekers or migrants experiencing social and economic difficulties.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号