暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: In this proof-of-concept study, we propose a new method for automated digital quantification of PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen of MElanoma) as a diagnostic aid to distinguish between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. The proposed method utilizes immunohistochemical virtual double nuclear staining for PRAME and SOX10 to precisely identify the melanocytic cells of interest, which is combined with digital image analyse to quantify a PRAME-index.
METHODS: Our study included 10 compound nevi, 3 halo nevi, and 10 melanomas. Tissue slides were stained with PRAME, scanned, the cover glass removed, stained with SOX10, scanned again, and finally analysed digitally. The digitally quantified PRAME-index was compared with a manual qualitative assessment by a dermatopathologist using the standard PRAME-scoring system.
RESULTS: The digitally quantified PRAME-index showed a sensitivity of 70 % and a specificity of 100 % for separating melanomas from benign lesions. The manual qualitative PRAME-score showed a sensitivity of 60 % and a specificity of 100 %. Comparing the two methods using ROC-analyses, our digital quantitative method (AUC: 0.931, 95 % CI: 0.834;1.00, SD: 0.050) remains on par with the manual qualitative method (AUC: 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.725;1.00, SD: 0.078).
CONCLUSIONS: We found our novel digital quantitative method was at least as precise at classifying lesions as benign or malignant as the current manual qualitative assessment. Our method has the advantages of being operator-independent, objective, and replicable. Furthermore, our method can easily be implemented in an already digitalized pathology department. Given the small cohort size, more studies are to be done to validate our findings.

BACKGROUND: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) has been extensively studied in cutaneous melanocytic tumors and has proven valuable as a diagnostic adjunct in routine dermatopathology practice. However, its expression in cutaneous vascular neoplasms, particularly angiosarcomas (AS), remains largely unexplored.
METHODS: To further explore PRAME expression in cutaneous AS, 18 cases of post-irradiation and 13 cases of primary cutaneous AS were evaluated for PRAME. For comparison, sections from 11 deep soft tissue/visceral AS, 10 Kaposi sarcomas, 8 microvenular hemangiomas, 7 infantile hemangiomas, 8 atypical vascular lesions, 6 epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas, 6 pyogenic granulomas, 6 papillary endothelial hyperplasias, 6 epithelioid hemangiomas, 3 capillovenous malformations, 3 hobnail hemangiomas, 2 spindle cell hemangiomas, 2 pseudomyogenic hemangioendotheliomas, and 2 composite hemangioendotheliomas were also retrieved.
RESULTS: Overall, 22 of 31 (70.9%; 12 post-irradiation and 10 primary) cutaneous AS were positive for PRAME. In contrast, only 1 of 11 (9.1%) deep soft tissue/visceral AS showed diffuse and strong PRAME nuclear staining. All other tumor types were negative for PRAME, except for 5 of 7 (71.4%) infantile hemangiomas, which demonstrated rare (<5%; four cases) and 1+ (5-25%; one case) nuclear staining.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have demonstrated frequent nuclear PRAME expression in cutaneous AS. PRAME immunohistochemistry may serve as a valuable additional marker in selected clinical settings.

Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) and Ten-Eleven Translocation (TET) dioxygenase-mediated 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are emerging melanoma biomarkers. We observed an inverse correlation between PRAME expression and 5hmC levels in benign nevi, melanoma in situ, primary invasive melanoma, and metastatic melanomas via immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence: nevi exhibited high 5hmC and low PRAME, whereas melanomas showed the opposite pattern. Single-cell multiplex imaging of melanoma precursors revealed that diminished 5hmC coincides with PRAME upregulation in premalignant cells. Analysis of TCGA and GTEx databases confirmed a negative relationship between TET2 and PRAME mRNA expression in melanoma. Additionally, 5hmC levels were reduced at the PRAME 5\' promoter in melanoma compared to nevi, suggesting a role for 5hmC in PRAME transcription. Restoring 5hmC levels via TET2 overexpression notably reduced PRAME expression in melanoma cell lines. These findings establish a function of TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation in regulating PRAME expression and demonstrate epigenetic reprogramming as pivotal in melanoma tumorigenesis.
UNASSIGNED: Melanoma biomarker PRAME expression is negatively regulated epigenetically by TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS)-dysfunction disease. We previously reported that high PRAME transcript levels associated with unfavorable progression free survival (PFS) in patients with no bortezomib therapy, and bortezomib-containing regimen significantly improved PFS in patients with high PRAME transcript levels, which indicated that PRAME expression was prognostic for MM patients, and was related to proteasome inhibitor treatment. However, molecular mechanisms underlying the above clinical performance remain unclear. In the present study, MM cell models with PRAME knockdown and overexpression were established, and PRAME was identified to play the role of promoting proliferation in MM cells. P-Akt signaling was found to be activated as PRAME overexpressed. As a substrate recognizing subunit (SRS) of the E3 ubiquitin ligase, PRAME targets substrate proteins and mediates their degradation. CTMP and p21 were found to be the novel targets of PRAME in the Cul2-dependent substrate recognition process. PRAME interacted with and mediated ubiquitination and degradation of CTMP and p21, which led to accumulation of p-Akt and CCND3 proteins, and thus promoted cell proliferation and increased bortezomib sensitivity in MM cells.

BACKGROUND: PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown utility in differentiating benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of PRAME expression in dysplastic nevi (DN) and nevus-associated melanoma in situ (MIS).
METHODS: We included 172 DN and 38 nevus-associated MIS from our institutional archive. PRAME positive expression was defined as nuclear staining in at least 75% of melanocytes. In addition, relevant studies from PubMed and Web of Science were incorporated into a meta-analysis using the random-effects model to assess PRAME expression in MIS and DN.
RESULTS: Our institutional data revealed that 71.1% of nevus-associated MIS cases exhibited positive PRAME expression in the MIS components, whereas all DN components were negative for PRAME. 5.7% of cases diagnosed as DN in our cohort demonstrated diffuse positivity for PRAME. Notably, MIS associated with DN displaying epidermal and dermal components displayed a higher likelihood of PRAME positivity compared to those arising on a background of DN with solely epidermal (junctional) components (84% vs. 46%, p = 0.024). The meta-analysis indicated that the pooled PRAME positivity in MIS and DN was 54.5% and 1.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PRAME is a valuable immunohistochemical marker for differentiating MIS from DN, particularly in the context of nevus-associated MIS.

BACKGROUND: The Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunostain has seen significant diagnostic use in confirming malignancy for melanocytic lesions. However, the expression of PRAME in genital melanocytic lesions have not been reported. In this study, PRAME staining was performed on a cohort of genital melanocytic lesions, aiming to investigate the diagnostic role of PRAME in genital melanocytic lesions and its expression in atypical genital nevi.
METHODS: A cohort including genital invasive melanoma, melanoma-in-situ, atypical genital nevus (AGN), compound nevus, intradermal nevus, blue nevus, lentigo and melanosis was retrieved with histology reviewed and PRAME immunostaining performed.
RESULTS: A total of 66 cases were reviewed. The average proportion expression of PRAME were 56.75 % and 57.43 % for invasive melanoma and melanoma-in-situ, with average H-scores of 153.5/300 and 163.14/300 respectively, which were greater than AGN (3.25 %, 7.75/300, p<0.001), compound/intradermal nevi, lentigo/melanosis, and background junctional melanocytes (<1 %, <1/300, p<0.001). The different cutoffs of PRAME expression, the sensitivity and specificity were 65.22 % and 100 % (>100/300); 69.57 % and 95.83 % (>10/300); and 82.61 % and 93.75 % (≥1/300) respectively. Low level PRAME expression was seen in half of the cases of AGN (n=2/4, 50 %), and at low cutoffs (>10/300 and ≥1/300) unable to differentiate invasive melanoma from AGN (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: For genital melanocytic lesions, PRAME immunostain shows high specificity at strong and diffuse staining. AGN not uncommonly display low level expression. Focal and/or weak PRAME expression should not be considered as an absolute indication of malignancy, and comprehensive histological assessment remains the key to accurate diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.

Melanoma, with its diverse histopathologic characteristics, can mimic both benign nevi and neoplasms of various cell lineages. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can play a vital role in melanoma diagnosis, particularly when the cell lineage is unclear on hematoxylin and eosin sections. Commonly utilized IHC stains for melanoma diagnosis include SOX10, Melan-A, and S100. A relatively novel stain, PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME), is also proving useful in accurate melanoma diagnosis. However, none of these stains are completely specific to melanocytes or melanoma, and misinterpretation can lead to incorrect diagnoses. This report presents a unique case of triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) metastatic to the skin exhibiting histopathologic characteristics similar to melanoma, including positivity for SOX10 and PRAME. Our aim is to highlight TNBC metastatic to the skin as a potential diagnostic pitfall.

Secondary malignancies are rare but devastating complications of longstanding burn scars. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common, followed by basal cell carcinoma and melanomas. There are fewer than 50 total reported cases of malignant melanomas arising in burn scars. We report a case of malignant melanoma arising within a longstanding burn scar confirmed by histology, FISH, and PRAME staining to further characterize melanomas arising in burn scars and to illustrate the diagnostic challenges they present.

Despite significant progress in targeted therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), clinical outcomes are disappointing for elderly patients, patients with less fit disease characteristics, and patients with adverse disease risk characteristics. Over the past 10 years, adaptive T-cell immunotherapy has been recognized as a strategy for treating various malignant tumors. However, it has faced significant challenges in AML, primarily because myeloid blasts do not contain unique surface antigens. The preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), a cancer-testis antigen, is abnormally expressed in AML and does not exist in normal hematopoietic cells. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that PRAME is a useful target for treating AML. This paper reviews the structure and function of PRAME, its effects on normal cells and AML blasts, its implications in prognosis and follow-up, and its use in antigen-specific immunotherapy for AML.