UNASSIGNED: Selecting an appropriate graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires consideration of a patient\'s preferences, goals, age, and physical demands alongside the risks and benefits of each graft choice.
UNASSIGNED: To determine the most popular ACL reconstruction grafts among patients and the most important factors influencing their decisions.
UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction between October 2022 and April 2023 completed a survey either before (nonconsult group) or after (consult group) speaking with their surgeon, who provided an evidence-based description of the pros and cons of an allograft and the following autografts: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT). Patient characteristics, graft choice, information influencing their graft choice, and surgeon recommendation were collected and compared between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: Among the 100 included patients, 59.0% were male, and the mean age was 28.3 ± 10.4 years. The most popular grafts were the BPTB (56.0%), followed by the QT (29.0%), HT (8.0%), and allograft (7.0%). No significant difference was observed in the graft selection between the consult group (n = 60; BPTB, 46.7%; QT, 38.3%; HT, 8.3%; allograft, 6.7%) and nonconsult group (n = 40; BPTB, 70.0%; QT, 15.0%; HT, 7.5%; allograft, 7.5%) (P = .0757). In the consult group, 81.7% of patients selected the graft recommended to them by their surgeon. The top 2 graft selection reasons were usage in professional athletes and failure rates, while the top 2 ACL surgery concerns were returning to their desired level of athletics and graft failure risk. Among the 93 patients who researched their ACL graft options before their visit, the most popular information source was some form of media (72.0% [67/93]).
UNASSIGNED: The study findings underscore the importance of patient preference and surgeon recommendation in a patient\'s graft selection and highlight the need to be cognizant of the information sources available to patients when researching their graft options.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe glenoid bone loss are at increased risk for poor implant fixation, scapular notching, dislocation, joint kinematic disturbances, and prosthetic failure following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Glenoid bone grafting has proven useful when performing rTSA in patients with inadequate glenoid bone stock, although the current literature is limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with significant glenoid deformity undergoing primary rTSA with one-stage glenoid reconstruction using a humeral head autograft.
METHODS: A database of prospectively enrolled patients was reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary rTSA with humeral head autograft (n=40) between 2008 and 2020 by six high-volume shoulder arthroplasty surgeons with minimum two-year follow-up. Variables studied included demographics, medical comorbidities, range of motion (ROM), Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, pain score, patient satisfaction, glenoid deformity, revisions and complications. Preoperative glenoid deformity was characterized using glenoid version and beta-angles, measured on computed tomography (CT). Improvement at final follow-up was compared to a matched control group of 120 standard primary rTSA patients. Following the post hoc Bonferroni correction, an adjusted alpha value of 0.004 was used to define statistical significance.
RESULTS: Forty patients were included with a mean follow-up of 5.3 (range, 2.0-13.2) years. Patients exhibited a mean preoperative glenoid retroversion and beta-angle of 29° and 80°, respectively. At final follow-up, patients who received a graft exhibited lower mean scores for active external rotation (25° vs. 39°; p = 0.001) in comparison to those who did not receive a graft. No differences were observed in active abduction (p = 0.029), active forward elevation (p = 0.009), active internal rotation (p = 0.147), passive external rotation (p = 0.082), Global Shoulder Function score (p = 0.157), Constant score (p = 0.036), ASES score (p = 0.009), or pain score (p = 0.186) between groups. Seven patients (17.5%) exhibited complications of which the most common being aseptic glenoid loosening (15%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients undergoing primary rTSA with autogenous humeral head autograft for severe glenoid deficiency experience postoperative improvements in ROM and functional outcome scores that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit but inferior to matched controls. This suggests that glenoid reconstruction using a resected humeral head autograft is an effective strategy when conducting primary rTSA in patients with significant glenoid deformity.

Introduction Restoring knee joint stability and resuming sports activities are important objectives of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The maintenance of anterior knee stability after ACL reconstruction is contingent on graft tension. Various devices and techniques have been used to achieve robust tibial graft tendon fixation, and their advantages and disadvantages are established. However, a gold standard has not been established. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether anterior knee joint stability and clinical outcomes of graft tendon fixation could be improved using a recently modified suture button (MSB) compared with using an adjustable suspensory fixator (ASF) at 1 year after double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed postoperative data derived from 79 patients at a single center between January 2016 and December 2021. The patients were assigned to groups that underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction with tibial fixation using an MSB (n = 30) that maintains tension while tying sutures, or an ASF (n = 49). We then compared complications, clinical outcomes and knee joint stability at 1 year postoperatively. Rates of postoperative infection, graft rupture, implant removal and residual anterior knee laxity (AKL) were compared between the groups using chi-square tests. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) based on Forgot Joint Score-12, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome, and Lysholm Knee scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results One patient in the MSB group developed postoperative infection. Rates of graft rupture and implant removal in the MSB and ASF groups were 3.3% and 4.1%, and 3.6% and 10.2%, respectively. None of the PROMs differed between the groups. The proportions of postoperative AKL were 3.6% and 14.9% in the MSB and ASF groups, respectively. A trend towards lower postoperative AKL in the MSB group did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.25). Conclusions The incidence of AKL at a year after ACL reconstruction using the MSB was 3%. Postoperative AKL and clinical outcomes were comparable between the MSB and ASF groups. A low AKL rate and positive postoperative outcomes indicated that MSB could be an option for tibial-side fixation in ACL reconstruction.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Disruption of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) may lead to recurrent lateral patellar dislocation and patellofemoral chondral injury. Despite significant previous work investigating numerous performance parameters, the optimal graft choice for MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability remains unclear.
UNASSIGNED: To compare functional outcomes scores, subjective recurrent instability, and revision rates between autograft and allograft in MPFL reconstruction.
UNASSIGNED: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with autograft between 2013 and 2018 were identified. A 2:1 comparison group of patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with allograft was matched by sex, age (±3 years), and body mass index (BMI) (±3 kg/m2). Patient characteristics, preoperative radiograph measurements, and intraoperative data were compared between the groups, as were patient-reported outcome measures, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Subjective recurrent instability and revision rate were also compared between groups.
UNASSIGNED: The autograft group was composed of 30 patients (13 male, 17 female) with a mean age of 24.4 years and mean BMI of 25.0 kg/m2, and the allograft group was composed of 60 matched patients (25 male, 35 female) with a mean age of 24.1 years and mean BMI of 25.1 kg/m2. The autograft and allograft groups reported similar IKDC scores (73.0 vs 73.7; P = .678), Lysholm scores (77.5 vs 80.7; P = .514), SANE (72.0 vs 75.8; P = .236), and VAS pain (30.7 vs 26.6; P = .482), as well as similar rates of postoperative patellar subluxations (20.0% vs 19.3%; P = .867) and dislocations (10.0% vs 15.0%; P = .805).
UNASSIGNED: Both allograft and autograft were found to be viable options for MPFL reconstruction. There were no significant group differences in failure rates, patient-reported outcomes, pain, or complications between autograft and allograft MPFL reconstruction in this series.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess early wound healing expression of local angiogenic biomarkers following connective tissue graft (CTG) at dental implant sites.
METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects with single dental implants exhibiting a soft tissue dehiscence were included and randomly treated with CTG, either with coronally advanced flap (CAF) or with tunnel technique (TUN). Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) was collected at the midfacial and midlingual aspect of the implant sites at baseline and at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 90 days after the surgical intervention. The expression of angiogenin (ANG), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was investigated over a period of 3 months. Patient-reported outcomes, clinical measurements, and ultrasonography scans at multiple time points were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The longitudinal regression revealed a significant difference in the expression of VEGF and TIMP-2 between CAF- and TUN-treated sites over 3 months (p = .033 and p = .004, respectively), whereas no significant differences were observed for ANG, FGF-2 and PDGF between the two groups. At 7 days, a direct correlation was observed between ANG levels and ultrasonographic color velocity in the CAF group (p < .001) and between ANG levels and ultrasonographic color power in the TUN group (p = .028). VEGF levels and ultrasonographic mean perfused area of the CTG were significantly correlated at the 7-day time point (p < .001 for both CAF and TUN). The expression of VEGF at 7 days was directly associated with mucosal thickness gain at 1 year (p < .001 for both groups). Early TIMP-2 expression showed an inverse correlation with time to recovery (p = .002). TIMP-2 levels at 3 months exhibited inverse correlations with mean dehiscence coverage (p = .004) and the rate of complete dehiscence coverage (p = .012).
CONCLUSIONS: PICF biomarkers can be used to monitor early wound healing events following soft tissue grafting at implant sites. VEGF and TIMP-2 showed correlations with the 1-year clinical and volumetric outcomes, as well as with post-operative patient-reported outcomes and Doppler Ultrasonographic tissue perfusion-related parameters.

BACKGROUND: Skin grafting is one of the most common procedures in plastic surgery. However, there are no defined guidelines for optimal fixation. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to consolidate existing evidence by comparing various graft securing methods and determining the most effective approach for clinical practice.
METHODS: An NMA was conducted using a predetermined protocol after searching several electronic databases from inception to October 2023 for studies examining skin grafting fixation outcomes in adults.
RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included in the analysis involving 1937 patients. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was the only method to significantly improve graft take percentages in comparison with the other modalities, whereas tie-over bolster (TOB) provided the worst results in take rates when examined as events. Fibrin glue (FIB) and TOB reduced hematoma and seroma rates when data were investigated in conjunction.
CONCLUSIONS: NPWT appears to be the most effective for skin graft adherence as opposed to traditional techniques. Its cost-effectiveness remains unclear, as NPWT is a relatively costly intervention compared with other methods. FIB and TOB are methods that can serve as a method of reducing hematoma and seroma rates in patients at high risk of bleeding.
METHODS: I.

UNASSIGNED: The interaction between the recipient area and the graft is one of the key factors in the success of periodontal plastic surgery. This randomized controlled, split-mouth, double-blinded clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of epithelialized palatal graft (EPG) and gingival unit graft (GUG) in achieving root coverage in localized (Recession Type 1) RT1 recession defects.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty participants with forty bilateral recession defects randomly received EPG or GUG surgical treatment modalities for each of the recession defects. Clinical measurements recorded at baseline and after six months included recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), and the average width of mesial and distal interdental papilla (aWIDP).
UNASSIGNED: There was a statistically significant greater mean root coverage (MRC) percentage at GUG sites (80.68 ± 16.12%) in comparison to EPG sites (71.05 ± 17.23%) (p = 0.01). The treatment satisfaction (p = 0.009) and aesthetic satisfaction (p < 0.001) experienced were significantly better for GUG as compared to EPG. The regression model (R 2 = 0.56) significantly predicted MRC percentage in GUG sites with baseline RD (β = -12.49; p = 0.02) and aWIDP (β = -9.31; p = 0.02).
UNASSIGNED: GUG showed a better MRC, aesthetics and increased KTW. Root coverage procedures often need to suffice the dual objective of coverage and aesthetics at the same time. GUG is a simple modification of the conventional EPG that can provide better clinical and aesthetic outcomes.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Gap non-union of long bones are challenging problems in orthopaedic patients. Non-vascularized fibular grafting is a simple, cost effective, single stage procedure and is an accepted method of reconstruction for gap non unions in children. However, there is a risk of non-union when a long avascular strut of fibula is used. The periosteum, by itself has high biological activity and is helpful in osteointegration. Harvesting the fibula with the periosteum gives the advantage of mechanical and biological support in a gap non-union.
METHODS: During 2020 to 2022, 13 patients presented to us with gap nonunion of long bones due to various aetiology. The mean age of the patients was six years with a mean bone gap of 4.2 cm. A modified technique of harvesting the fibula with the periosteum is described. The graft was stabilized with the recipient bone by intra medullary or extra medullary implants.
RESULTS: Union occurred in average 12.7 weeks in all except one patient with congenital pseudoarthrosis of tibia. The fibula on the harvest site regenerated completely in all other patients. One patient had a superficial infection. Children were followed were an average of 17.5 months and there was no incidence of graft resorption or fracture. Osteoperiosteal fibula graft is a simple, effective and cost-effective procedure for the treatment of gap non-unions in children. It offers the advantage of both biological and mechanical support, with high union rates and low complication rates.