OBJECTIVE: Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) is a unique therapeutic target for pharmacoresistant epilepsy (PRE). As seizure-induced neuronal programmed death, parthanatos was rarely reported in PRE. Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), which has been implicated in parthanatos, shares a common cytoprotective function with SV2A. We aimed to investigate whether parthanatos participates in PRE and is mitigated by SV2A via AIF.
METHODS: An intraperitoneal injection of lithium chloride-pilocarpine was used to establish an epileptic rat model, and phenytoin and phenobarbital sodium were utilized to select PRE and pharmacosensitive rats. The expression of SV2A was manipulated via lentivirus delivery into the hippocampus. Video surveillance was used to assess epileptic ethology. Biochemical tests were employed to test hippocampal tissues following a successful SV2A infection. Molecular dynamic calculations were used to simulate the interaction between SV2A and AIF.
RESULTS: Parthanatos core index, PARP1, PAR, nuclear AIF and MIF, γ-H2AX, and TUNEL staining were all increased in PRE. SV2A is bound to AIF to form a stable complex, successfully inhibiting AIF and MIF nuclear translocation and parthanatos and consequently mitigating spontaneous recurrent seizures in PRE. Moreover, parthanatos deteriorated after the SV2A reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: SV2A protected hippocampal neurons and mitigated epileptic seizures by inhibiting parthanatos via binding to AIF in PRE.

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder that is primarily treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs). Although dozens of ASMs are available in the clinic, approximately 30% of epileptic patients have medically refractory seizures; other limitations in most traditional ASMs include poor tolerability and drug-drug interactions. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop alternative ASMs. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a first-line ASM that is well tolerated, has promising efficacy, and has little drug-drug interaction. Although it is widely accepted that LEV acts through a unique therapeutic target synaptic vesicle protein (SV) 2A, the molecular basis of its action remains unknown. Even so, the next-generation SV2A ligands against epilepsy based on the structure of LEV have achieved clinical success. This review highlights the research and development (R&D) process of LEV and its analogs, brivaracetam and padsevonil, to provide ideas and experience for the R&D of novel ASMs.

Alzheimer\'s disease (AD), a serious neurodegenerative disease, is pathologically characterized by synaptic loss and dysfunction. Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) is an indispensable vesicular protein specifically expressed in synapses and can be used as a biomarker for synaptic density. We found that the expression of SV2A was down-regulated in the hippocampus of AD patients, yet the relation of SV2A to other hallmarks of AD pathology such as amyloid precursor protein (APP), β-amyloid (Aβ), and Tau protein is not thoroughly clear. In addition, SV2A colocalized with APP and was down-regulated at Aβ deposition. Moreover, we found that SV2A deficiency leads to a simultaneous increase in Aβ and Tau hyperphosphorylation, while SV2A overexpression was associated with downregulation of β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 and apolipoprotein E genes. In addition, evidence gained in the study points to the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling pathway as a possible mediator in SV2A regulation influencing the incidence and development of AD. With limited effective diagnostic methods for AD, a close interplay between SV2A and AD-related proteins demonstrated in our study may provide novel and innovative diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.

The antiepileptic/anticonvulsive action of brivaracetam is considered to occur via modulation of synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A); however, the pharmacological mechanisms of action have not been fully characterised. To explore the antiepileptic/anticonvulsive mechanism of brivaracetam associated with SV2A modulation, this study determined concentration-dependent effects of brivaracetam on astroglial L-glutamate release associated with connexin43 (Cx43), tumour-necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)/glutamate receptor of rat primary cultured astrocytes using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Furthermore, interaction among TNFα, elevated extracellular K+ and brivaracetam on expression of SV2A and Cx43 was determined using capillary immunoblotting. TNFα and elevated extracellular K+ predominantly enhanced astroglial L-glutamate release associated with respective AMPA/glutamate receptor and hemichannel. These effects were enhanced by a synergistic effect of TNFα and elevated extracellular K+ in combination. The activation of astroglial L-glutamate release, and expression of SV2A and Cx43 in the plasma membrane was suppressed by subchronic brivaracetam administration but were unaffected by acute administration. These results suggest that migration of SV2A to the astroglial plasma membrane by hyperexcitability activates astroglial glutamatergic transmission, perhaps via hemichannel activation. Subchronic brivaracetam administration suppressed TNFα-induced activation of AMPA/glutamate receptor and hemichannel via inhibition of ectopic SV2A. These findings suggest that combined inhibition of vesicular and ectopic SV2A functions contribute to the antiepileptic/anticonvulsive mechanism of brivaracetam action.

Synaptic loss is a prominent and early feature of many neurodegenerative diseases.
We tested the hypothesis that synaptic density is reduced in the primary tauopathies of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) (Richardson\'s syndrome) and amyloid-negative corticobasal syndrome (CBS).
Forty-four participants (15 CBS, 14 PSP, and 15 age-/sex-/education-matched controls) underwent PET with the radioligand [11 C]UCB-J, which binds to synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A, a marker of synaptic density; participants also had 3 Tesla MRI and clinical and neuropsychological assessment.
Nine CBS patients had negative amyloid biomarkers determined by [11 C]PiB PET and hence were deemed likely to have corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Patients with PSP-Richardson\'s syndrome and amyloid-negative CBS were impaired in executive, memory, and visuospatial tasks. [11 C]UCB-J binding was reduced across frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, cingulate, hippocampus, insula, amygdala, and subcortical structures in both PSP and CBD patients compared to controls (P < 0.01), with median reductions up to 50%, consistent with postmortem data. Reductions of 20% to 30% were widespread even in areas of the brain with minimal atrophy. There was a negative correlation between global [11 C]UCB-J binding and the PSP and CBD rating scales (R = -0.61, P < 0.002; R = -0.72, P < 0.001, respectively) and a positive correlation with the revised Addenbrooke\'s Cognitive Examination (R = 0.52; P = 0.01).
We confirm severe synaptic loss in PSP and CBD in proportion to disease severity, providing critical insight into the pathophysiology of primary degenerative tauopathies. [11 C]UCB-J may facilitate treatment strategies for disease-modification, synaptic maintenance, or restoration. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

11C-UCB-J ((R)-1-((3-(11C-methyl-11C)pyridin-4-yl)methyl)-4-(3,4,5-trifluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-one) is a PET tracer for synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A, which may be a marker of synaptic density. To simplify the scan protocol, SUV ratios (SUVRs) were compared with model-based nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) to select the optimal time window in healthy and neuropsychiatric subjects. Methods: In total, 141 scans were acquired for 90 min. Arterial blood sampling and metabolite analysis were conducted. SUVR-1 (centrum semiovale reference region) was computed for six 30-min windows and compared with 1-tissue-compartment model BPND Simulations were performed to assess the time dependency of SUVR-1. Results: Greater correlation and less bias were observed for SUVR-1 at later time windows for all subjects. Simulations showed that the agreement between SUVR-1 and BPND is time-dependent. Conclusion: The 60- to 90-min period provided the best match between SUVR-1 and BPND (-1% ± 7%); thus, a short scan is sufficient for accurate quantification of 11C-UCB-J-specific binding.

Long-term therapy with older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), but not levetiracetam (LEV), may increase the risk of atherosclerosis (AS), suggesting that LEV may have a potential anti-AS effect. The synaptic vesicle 2A (SV2A) is known to the specific binding site of LEV. Numerous studies have documented that SV2A is a membrane protein specifically expressed in nervous system. Interestingly, our previous research showed that SV2A also existed in human CD8+ T lymphocytes. Therefore, we hypothesized that LEV was associated with decreased risk of AS by regulating monocytes chemotaxis and adhesion. We showed that SV2A protein were detected in THP-1 human monocytic leukemia cells. LEV (300 μM) inhibited the chemotaxis and adhesion of THP-1 cells after transfection with plasmids expressing SV2AWT, but not SV2AR383Q which was a known functional mutation site of human SV2A. Furthermore, RT-PCR and western blot analysis demonstrated that LEV (300 μM) decreased the expression level of chemokine-related receptors (CX3CL1, CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5),and reduced levels of phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) in THP-1 cells with SV2AWT expressing plasmids. Taken together, these findings indicated that LEV has an inhibitory effect on THP-1 monocyte adhesion and chemotaxis, suggesting that SV2A may serve as a novel therapeutic target to prevent AS.

Introduction: Brivaracetam (BRV) is an analog of levetiracetam (LEV) with 15-30 times greater affinity to SV2A and greater brain permeability than LEV. These properties have stimulated interest in its clinical trial data and post-marketing experience. Areas covered: The authors provide a background on epilepsy and its treatment, discuss the racetam family of antiepileptic drugs to which BRV belongs, and then discuss BRV properties and its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of epilepsy. Expert opinion: While preclinical data suggest a broad spectrum of efficacy, BRV is only approved for focal epilepsy. The recommended starting dose is 100 mg per day, but in the absence of urgency, it may be prudent to start at 50 mg per day, considered the lowest effective dose. There was no added benefit when BRV was used adjunctively with LEV in clinical trials. However, post-marketing data suggest that some patients may experience improved seizure control when switching from LEV. Behavioral adverse effects seemed less common than with LEV, and most patients switched to BRV after experiencing behavioral adverse effects on LEV reported improvement. Prior or anticipated intolerability to LEV is the strongest indication for BRV in clinical practice.

Brivaracetam (BRV), the n-propyl analogue of levetiracetam (LEV), is the latest antiepileptic drug (AED) to be licensed in Europe and the USA for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in patients aged 16 years or older. Like LEV, BRV binds to synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), but BRV has more selective binding and a 15- to 30-fold higher binding affinity than LEV. BRV is more effective than LEV in slowing synaptic vesicle mobilization and the two AEDs may act at different binding sites or interact with different conformational states of the SV2A protein. In animal models, BRV provides protection against focal and secondary generalized seizures and has significant anticonvulsant effects in genetic models of epilepsy. The drug undergoes first-order pharmacokinetics with an elimination half-life of 7-8 h. Although BRV is metabolized extensively, the main circulating compound is unchanged BRV. Around 95% of metabolites undergo renal elimination. No dose reduction is required in renal impairment, but it is recommended that the daily dose is reduced by one-third in hepatic dysfunction that may prolong half-life. BRV has a low potential for drug interactions. The efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive BRV in adults with focal-onset seizures have been explored in six randomized, placebo-controlled studies. These showed significant efficacy outcomes for doses of 50-200 mg/day. The most common adverse events reported were headache, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue and nausea. Patients who develop psychiatric symptoms with LEV appear to be at risk of similar side effects with BRV, although preliminary data suggest that these issues are likely to be less frequent and perhaps less severe. As with all AEDs, a low starting dose and slow titration schedule help to minimize side effects and optimize seizure control and thereby quality of life.

To evaluate factors predicting efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add-on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice.
A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients who started BRV between February and November 2016 with observation time between 3 and 12 months.
Of a total of 262 patients (mean age 40, range 5-81 years, 129 male) treated with BRV, 227 (87%) were diagnosed to have focal, 19 (7%) idiopathic generalized and 8 (3%) symptomatic generalized epilepsy, whereas 8 (3%) were unclassified. The length of exposure to BRV ranged from 1 day to 12 months, with a median retention time of 6.1 months, resulting in a total exposure time to BRV of 1,504 months. The retention rate was 79.4% at 3 months and 75.8% at 6 months. Efficacy at 3 months was 41.2% (50% responder rate) with 14.9% seizure-free for 3 months and, at 6 months, 40.5% with 15.3% seizure-free. Treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 37.8% of the patients, with the most common being somnolence, dizziness, and behavioral adverse events (BAEs). BAE that presented under previous levetiracetam (LEV) treatment improved upon switch to BRV in 57.1% (20/35) and LEV-induced somnolence improved in 70.8% (17/24). Patients with BAE on LEV were more likely to develop BAE on BRV (odds ratio [OR] 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-7.95).
BRV in broad clinical postmarketing use is a well-tolerated anticonvulsant drug with 50% responder rates, similar to those observed in the regulatory trials, even though 90% of the patients included had previously been exposed to LEV. An immediate switch from LEV to BRV at a ratio of 10:1 to 15:1 is feasible. The only independent significant predictor of efficacy was the start of BRV in patients not currently taking LEV. The occurrence of BAE during previous LEV exposure predicted poor psychobehavioral tolerability of BRV treatment. A switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV-induced BAE.