本文将语言语篇分析与角色理论相结合,为德国安全政策创建了角色理论语篇分析框架。为了说明这一点,我们对有关国际安全援助部队驻阿富汗特派团的议会辩论的30分钟进行了topos分析,由德国议员在2001年至2014年之间进行。我们根据与德国安全政策相关的关键行为规范来解释他们对德国角色的看法。议会的话语,由topoi塑造,为德国在海外的军事行动做出决定奠定了基础。topoi的使用受到主导思维模式的影响,特别是政治精英对德国在安全政策中的作用的看法。政治决策,反过来,反映在这些观点指导下的行为偏好。我们的研究揭示了德国安全政策的变化如何反映在话语中。本文围绕五类topoi进行,以使国外的军事行动合法化或合法化:必要性,义务,自我利益,能力和准备,和解决方案。通过角色理论的镜头对topoi的使用进行评估表明,随着时间的推移,对德国角色的看法已经演变。包括“平民权力”等角色,\"a\"正常状态,与外国军事接触同步的“议程设定角色”。
This article combines linguistic discourse analysis with role theory to create a role-theoretic discourse analysis framework for German security policy. To illustrate this, we employ topos analysis on 30 plenary minutes of parliamentary debates regarding the International Security Assistance Force mission in Afghanistan, conducted by German Members of Parliament between 2001 and 2014. We interpret their perception of Germany\'s roles in light of key behavioral norms related to German security policy. The parliamentary discourse, shaped by topoi, sets the stage for decisions on German military operations abroad. The use of topoi is influenced by dominant thought patterns, particularly the perspective on Germany\'s role in security policy held by the political elite. Political decisions, in turn, reflect behavioral preferences guided by these viewpoints. Our research reveals how changes in German security policy are mirrored in the discourse. This discourse is structured around five categories of topoi for legitimizing or delegitimizing military operations abroad: necessity, obligation, self-interest, capability and preparedness, and solution. An evaluation of the use of topoi through the lens of role theory indicates that perceptions of Germany\'s role have evolved over time, encompassing roles such as a \"civilian power,\" a \"normal state,\" and an \"agenda-setting role\" in sync with its foreign military engagements.