residual kidney function

残余肾功能
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    需要透析治疗的晚期肾功能不全患者表现出不同程度的天然肾功能。称为残余肾功能(RKF),从零到可观的水平。本手稿的主要重点是深入研究RKF的概念,肾病学中一个关键但代表性不足的话题。开始,我们解开RKF的定义和内在本质。然后,我们将RKF的效率与血液透析的效率并列,以保持稳态平衡并促进生理功能。考虑到RKF和患者整体健康的复杂相互作用,我们揭示了它对患者预后的影响程度,特别是那些患有晚期肾功能不全和透析的患者。本手稿随后提出了评估RKF的方法和措施,最后总结了旨在保留RKF的针对性干预措施的潜在益处。
    Individuals afflicted with advanced kidney dysfunction who require dialysis for medical management exhibit different degrees of native kidney function, called residual kidney function (RKF), ranging from nil to appreciable levels. The primary focus of this manuscript is to delve into the concept of RKF, a pivotal yet under-represented topic in nephrology. To begin, we unpack the definition and intrinsic nature of RKF. We then juxtapose the efficiency of RKF against that of hemodialysis in preserving homeostatic equilibrium and facilitating physiological functions. Given the complex interplay of RKF and overall patient health, we shed light on the extent of its influence on patient outcomes, particularly in those living with advanced kidney dysfunction and on dialysis. This manuscript subsequently presents methodologies and measures to assess RKF, concluding with the potential benefits of targeted interventions aimed at preserving RKF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在开始慢性血液透析(HD)的患者中,残余肾功能的纵向变化尚未得到充分检查。
    我们在TwoPlus初步研究中分析了42例随机接受增量HD(n=21)和常规HD(n=21)的患者的定时尿液收集和相应血浆样本的尿量和肾溶质清除率。在HD开始前(基线)和在第6、12、24和48周收集样品。我们评估了尿量的时间趋势,肾尿素和肌酐清除率,以及尿量与肾脏溶质清除率之间的相关性。
    所有患者的残余肾功能参数随时间下降;尿量和肾溶质清除率之间的下降模式不同。尿量以稳定的速率下降,在第6周时相对于基线的中位数(四分位数1,四分位数3)百分比变化为-10%(-36至29),到第48周时为-47%(-76至5)。在第6周时,肾脏尿素和肌酐清除率比尿量下降更大,分别为-32%(-61至8)和-47%(-57至-20),分别。随后下降速度放缓,到第48周,两种溶质的下降幅度约为61%。在第6周,常规HD显示出尿量和肾脏尿素清除率的下降幅度大于增量HD。尿量与尿素呈中等相关性(R=0.47),与肌酐呈较弱相关性(R=0.34)。
    尽管尿量和肾脏溶质清除率逐渐减少,残余肾功能在HD开始后持续近1年。这些知识可以通过结合残留的肾功能来激发个性化HD处方的更多实践。
    UNASSIGNED: Longitudinal changes in residual kidney function have not been well-examined in patients starting chronic hemodialysis (HD).
    UNASSIGNED: We analyzed urine volume and kidney solute clearances from timed urine collections and corresponding plasma samples from 42 patients randomized to incremental HD (n = 21) and conventional HD (n = 21) in the TwoPlus pilot study. Samples were collected before HD initiation (baseline); and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. We assessed temporal trends in urine volume, kidney urea and creatinine clearance, and correlations between urine volume and kidney solute clearance.
    UNASSIGNED: Residual kidney function parameters in all patients declined over time; the pattern of decline differed between urine volume and kidney solute clearances. Urine volume declined at a steady rate with median (quartile 1, quartile 3) percentage change relative to baseline of -10% (-36 to 29) at week 6 and -47% (-76 to 5) by week 48. Kidney urea and creatinine clearances exhibited a larger decline than urine volume at week 6, -32% (-61 to 8) and -47% (-57 to -20), respectively. The rate of decline subsequently slowed, reaching about 61% decline for both solutes by week 48. Conventional HD demonstrated larger declines in urine volume and kidney urea clearance than incremental HD at week 6. Urine volume showed moderate correlation with urea (R = 0.47) and weaker correlation with creatinine (R = 0.34).
    UNASSIGNED: Despite gradual decrement in urine volume and kidney solute clearances, residual kidney function persists nearly 1 year after HD initiation. This knowledge could motivate increased practice of individualizing HD prescriptions by incorporating residual kidney function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在从慢性肾脏疾病到终末期肾脏疾病的过渡背景下,适当的透析处方仍然具有挑战性。常规每周三次血液透析(HD)可能与残余肾功能(RKF)的快速丧失和高死亡率有关。本系统综述和荟萃分析探讨了增量HD与传统HD相比的益处和风险。
    我们搜索了MEDLINE,截至2023年4月,Scopus和Cochrane中央对照试验登记册,用于比较增量(每周一次或两次HD)和常规每周三次HD对心血管事件的影响,RKF,血管通路并发症,生活质量,住院和死亡率。
    本荟萃分析共纳入36篇文章(138.939名参与者)。增量HD和常规HD的死亡率和心血管事件相似{比值比[OR]0.87[95%置信区间(CI)]0.72-1.04和OR0.67[95%CI0.43-1.05],分别}。然而,在接受增量HD治疗的患者中,住院率和RKF损失显著降低[OR0.44(95%CI0.27-0.72)和OR0.31(95%CI0.25-0.39),分别]。在敏感性分析中,包括限制于RKF或尿量标准的研究,增量HD的心血管事件[OR0.22(95%CI0.08-0.63)]和死亡率[OR0.54(95%CI0.37-0.79)]显著降低.血管通路并发症,高钾血症和容量超负荷在组间无统计学差异.
    增量HD已被证明是安全的,并且可能在临床结果中提供卓越的益处,特别是在适当选择的患者中。需要大规模的随机对照试验来证实这些潜在的优势。
    UNASSIGNED: Appropriate dialysis prescription in the transitional setting from chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney disease is still challenging. Conventional thrice-weekly haemodialysis (HD) might be associated with rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and high mortality. The benefits and risks of incremental HD compared with conventional HD were explored in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2023 for studies that compared the impacts of incremental (once- or twice-weekly HD) and conventional thrice-weekly HD on cardiovascular events, RKF, vascular access complications, quality of life, hospitalization and mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 36 articles (138 939 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The mortality rate and cardiovascular events were similar between incremental and conventional HD {odds ratio [OR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.72-1.04 and OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.43-1.05], respectively}. However, hospitalization and loss of RKF were significantly lower in patients treated with incremental HD [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.27-0.72) and OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.25-0.39), respectively]. In a sensitivity analysis that included studies restricted to those with RKF or urine output criteria, incremental HD had significantly lower cardiovascular events [OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.08-0.63)] and mortality [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.79)]. Vascular access complications, hyperkalaemia and volume overload were not statistically different between groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Incremental HD has been shown to be safe and may provide superior benefits in clinical outcomes, particularly in appropriately selected patients. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these potential advantages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    腹膜透析(PD)时,残余肾功能(RKF)会影响患者的生存率和生活质量。这项荟萃分析旨在系统地确定与RKF下降和损失相关的风险和保护因素。
    从成立到2023年1月31日,我们搜索了三个英文数据库和一个中文数据库,以进行队列和横断面研究,探索与RKF下降或损失相关的因素。随机效应模型用于汇总来自多变量分析的风险估计和95%置信区间(CI)。进行敏感性和亚组分析以探索研究之间的异质性。
    27项研究包括13549名个体和14个因素纳入荟萃分析。根据荟萃分析结果,涉及男性性别的危险因素(危险比(HR)1.689,95CI1.385-2.061),较大的体重指数(BMI)(比值比(OR)1.081,95%置信区间(CI)1.029-1.135),较高的收缩压(SBP)(HR1.014,95CI1.005-1.024),糖尿病(DM)(HRRKF损失1.873,95CI1.475-2.378),DM(ORRKF下跌1.906,95CI1.262-2.879),腹膜炎(相对比率(RR)2.291,95CI1.633-3.213),蛋白尿(OR1.223,95CI1.117-1.338),和血清磷升高(RR2.655,95CI1.679-4.201)显着导致PD患者RKF下降和丢失的风险。相反,年龄较大(HR0.968,95CI0.956-0.981),高血清白蛋白(OR0.834,95CI0.720-0.966),每周Kt/V尿素(HR0.414,95CI0.248-0.690),基线尿量(UV)(HR0.791,95CI0.639-0.979),基线RKF(HR0.795,95CI0.739-0.857)表现出保护作用。然而,利尿剂的使用,自动腹膜透析(APD)模式和基线RKF对RKF下降无显著影响.
    男性患者,更大的BMI,更高的SBP,DM,腹膜炎,蛋白尿,血清磷升高可能有更高的RKF下降和丢失的风险。相比之下,年龄较大,血清白蛋白较高,每周Kt/V尿素,基线UV,和基线RKF可能防止RKF恶化。
    UNASSIGNED: Residual kidney function (RKF) impacts patients\' survival rate and quality of life when undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically identify risk and protective factors associated with RKF decline and loss.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched three English and one Chinese databases from inception to January 31, 2023, for cohort and cross-sectional studies exploring factors associated with RKF decline or loss. The random effects model was employed to aggregate risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from multivariate analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the heterogeneity among the studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven studies comprising 13549 individuals and 14 factors were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the meta-analysis results, risk factors involving male gender (hazard ratio (HR) 1.689, 95%CI 1.385-2.061), greater body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio (OR) 1.081, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.029-1.135), higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (HR 1.014, 95%CI 1.005-1.024), diabetes mellitus (DM) (HRRKF loss 1.873, 95%CI 1.475-2.378), DM (ORRKF decline 1.906, 95%CI 1.262-2.879), peritonitis (relative ratio (RR) 2.291, 95%CI 1.633-3.213), proteinuria (OR 1.223, 95%CI 1.117-1.338), and elevated serum phosphorus (RR 2.655, 95%CI 1.679-4.201) significantly contributed to the risk of RKF decline and loss in PD patients. Conversely, older age (HR 0.968, 95%CI 0.956-0.981), higher serum albumin (OR 0.834, 95%CI 0.720-0.966), weekly Kt/V urea (HR 0.414, 95%CI 0.248-0.690), baseline urine volume (UV) (HR 0.791, 95%CI 0.639-0.979), baseline RKF (HR 0.795, 95%CI 0.739-0.857) exhibited protective effects. However, diuretics use, automatic peritoneal dialysis (APD) modality and baseline RKF did not significantly impact RKF decline.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with male gender, greater BMI, higher SBP, DM, peritonitis, proteinuria, and elevated serum phosphorus might have a higher risk of RKF decline and loss. In contrast, older age, higher serum albumin, weekly Kt/V urea, baseline UV, and baseline RKF might protect against RKF deterioration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血液透析患者残余肾功能(RKF)的生存益处可能是由于增强的液体管理和溶质清除。然而,有关肾尿素清除率(CLurea)与特定死亡原因的相关性的数据缺乏.
    我们从2007年至2011年对39,623名开始每周三次中心血液透析的成年人进行了一项纵向队列研究,并获得了有关肾脏CL脲和尿量的数据。多变量原因特异性比例风险模型用于检查基线RKF和原因特异性死亡率之间的关联。包括心脏性猝死(SCD),非SCD心血管死亡(CVD),非CVD在开始血液透析后6个月内,对RKF的变化进行了有限的立方样条拟合。
    在39,623例患者中,有基线肾脏CLurea和尿量的数据,在较低的RKF水平下,有较高的死亡风险趋势,在病例组合调整模型中,与死亡原因无关(Ptrend<0.05)。超滤率(UFR)的调整略微减弱了低肾性CL脲和高病因特异性死亡率之间的关联。而对最高钾的调整没有实质性影响。在有RKF变化数据的12169名患者中,6个月的肾脏CLurea下降显示与SCD分级相关,非SCDCVD,和非CVD风险,而6个月尿量下降较快和死亡风险较高之间的分级关联仅在SCD和非CVD中明确.
    在开始每周三次中心血液透析的患者中,较低的RKF和RKF丢失与较高的病因特异性死亡率相关。
    UNASSIGNED: The survival benefit of residual kidney function (RKF) in patients on hemodialysis is presumably due to enhanced fluid management and solute clearance. However, data are lacking on the association of renal urea clearance (CLurea) with specific causes of death.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of 39,623 adults initiating thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis from 2007 to 2011 and had data on renal CLurea and urine volume. Multivariable cause-specific proportional hazards model was used to examine the associations between baseline RKF and cause-specific mortality, including sudden cardiac death (SCD), non-SCD cardiovascular death (CVD), and non-CVD. Restricted cubic splines were fitted for change in RKF over 6 months after initiating hemodialysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 39,623 patients with data on baseline renal CLurea and urine volume, there was a significant trend toward a higher mortality risk across lower RKF levels, irrespective of cause of death in a case-mix adjustment model (Ptrend < 0.05). Adjustment for ultrafiltration rate (UFR) slightly attenuated the association between low renal CLurea and high cause-specific mortality, whereas adjustment for highest potassium did not have substantial effect. Among 12,169 patients with data on change in RKF, a 6-month decline in renal CLurea showed graded associations with SCD, non-SCD CVD, and non-CVD risk, whereas the graded associations between faster 6-month decline in urine output and higher death risk were clear only for SCD and non-CVD.
    UNASSIGNED: Lower RKF and loss of RKF were associated with higher cause-specific mortality among patients initiating thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    残余肾功能(RKF)与更好的生存率相关。发病率较低,并改善腹膜透析(PD)患者的生活质量。由于更高的腹膜间隙不会导致更好的结果,应更加重视保护肾功能。据报道,许多其他好处,包括更好的容量和血压控制,营养状况更好,PD腹膜炎的发病率较低,保存的促红细胞生成素和维生素D的生产,中间分子清除,下左心室肥厚,和更好的血清磷酸盐水平。评估RKF的最实用方法是24小时尿尿素和肌酐清除率的平均值。递增PD处方是补充PD患者RKF的理想选择,这也为患者提供了更大的灵活性,可能,提高依从性。在PD患者中,应尽可能使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂以保留RKF。尽管提供了维持体液平衡和减少对含更高葡萄糖的PD溶液的需要的额外手段,但在PD患者中环状利尿剂未得到充分利用。在本文中,我们概述了RKF在PD患者中的重要性以及保留RKF的不同策略.
    Residual kidney function (RKF) has been associated with better survival, less morbidity, and improved quality of life in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Since higher peritoneal clearance does not lead to better outcomes, more emphasis should be put on preserving kidney function. Many other benefits have been reported, including better volume and blood pressure control, better nutritional status, lower rates of PD peritonitis, preserved erythropoietin and vitamin D production, middle molecule clearance, lower Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and better serum phosphate level. The most practical method of assessing RKF is the mean of 24-h urinary urea and creatinine clearance. Incremental PD prescription is an ideal option to supplement RKF in PD patients, which also offers more flexibility to the patient and, possibly, improved adherence. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers should be used when possible in PD patients to preserve RKF. Loop diuretics are underutilized in PD patients despite providing an additional means of maintaining fluid balance and reducing the need for higher glucose-containing PD solutions. In this paper, we outline the importance of RKF in PD patients and the different strategies for its preservation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的残余肾功能与更好的生活质量和预后相关;因此,应实施保护肾功能的策略。在促进肾脏损害的多种原因中,需要注意由于尿毒症毒素产生增加和内毒素血症引起的肠道生态失调。已经提出了几种策略来调节这些患者的肠道微生物群,近年来,饮食越来越受到关注,因为它是肠道菌群失调的主要驱动因素。此外,药物和粪便移植可能是有效的策略。改变肠道微生物群组成可以减轻慢性肾损伤并保留残余肾功能。尽管各种研究表明饮食在调节肠道微生物群组成中的重要作用,这种调节对残余肾功能的影响仍然有限。这篇综述讨论了肠道微生物群代谢对残余肾功能的作用,反之亦然,以及我们如何通过调节肠道微生物群平衡来保持残余肾功能。
    Residual kidney function for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with better quality of life and outcome; thus, strategies should be implemented to preserve kidney function. Among the multiple causes that promote kidney damage, gut dysbiosis due to increased uremic toxin production and endotoxemia need attention. Several strategies have been proposed to modulate the gut microbiota in these patients, and diet has gained increasing attention in recent years since it is the primary driver of gut dysbiosis. In addition, medications and faecal transplantation may be valid strategies. Modifying gut microbiota composition may mitigate chronic kidney damage and preserve residual kidney function. Although various studies have shown the influential role of diet in modulating gut microbiota composition, the effects of this modulation on residual kidney function remain limited. This review discusses the role of gut microbiota metabolism on residual kidney function and vice versa and how we could preserve the residual kidney function by modulating the gut microbiota balance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    SGLT-2i是糖尿病肾病(DKD)的新护理标准,但之前的研究并未包括接受肾脏替代治疗(KRT)的患者.由于他们患心血管疾病的风险很高,肾脏并发症,和死亡率,这些患者将从这种治疗中获益最大。残余肾功能(RKF)在血液透析(HD)患者中传达了生存益处和心血管健康,尤其是那些增加血液透析(iHD)。我们回顾性描述了SGLT2i在7名具有不同临床背景的糖尿病患者中保留RKF的安全性和有效性,这些患者在12个月的随访期间接受了iHD(每周一次或两次)。所有患者保留RKF,在引入SGLT2i后24小时内测量为残余肾尿素清除率(KrU)。在12个月时,KrU水平从4.91±1.14mL/min显着提高到7.28±1.68mL/min(p=0.028)。血液透析前血压平均收缩压(SBP)改善9.95%(p=0.015),平均舒张压(DBP)改善10.95%(p=0.041);抗高血压药物被修改。改善血尿酸,血红蛋白A1c,尿白蛋白/肌酐比值(UACR),24h蛋白尿也很明显。关于副作用,两名患者出现了无并发症的尿路感染,并得到了解决。未报告其他并发症。在我们的DKD患者样本中使用SGLT2i以1-2周方案开始iHD似乎在保留RKF方面是安全有效的。
    SGLT-2i are the new standard of care for diabetic kidney disease (DKD), but previous studies have not included patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Due to their high risk of cardiovascular, renal complications, and mortality, these patients would benefit the most from this therapy. Residual kidney function (RKF) conveys a survival benefit and cardiovascular health among hemodialysis (HD) patients, especially those on incremental hemodialysis (iHD). We retrospectively describe the safety and efficacy of SGLT2i regarding RKF preservation in seven diabetic patients with different clinical backgrounds who underwent iHD (one or two sessions per week) during a 12-month follow-up. All patients preserved RKF, measured as residual kidney urea clearance (KrU) in 24 h after the introduction of SGLT2i. KrU levels improved significantly from 4.91 ± 1.14 mL/min to 7.28 ± 1.68 mL/min at 12 months (p = 0.028). Pre-hemodialysis blood pressure improved 9.95% in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p = 0.015) and 10.95% in mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p = 0.041); as a result, antihypertensive medication was modified. Improvements in blood uric acid, hemoglobin A1c, urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), and 24 h proteinuria were also significant. Regarding side effects, two patients developed uncomplicated urinary tract infections that were resolved. No other complications were reported. The use of SGLT2i in our sample of DKD patients starting iHD on a 1-2 weekly regimen appears to be safe and effective in preserving RKF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    在接受意外血液透析的患者中,成纤维细胞生长因子-23(FGF-23)水平升高与心血管疾病(CVD)的发展有关,但残余肾功能(RFK)对这种关联的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨FGF-23水平之间的关系,RKF,接受普遍血液透析的患者的CVD。
    这项横断面和纵向观察性研究包括296例接受维持性血液透析至少3个月的患者,随访中位数为44个月。RKF定义为24小时尿量>200mL,左心室(LV)舒张功能障碍如超声心动图参数的E/E'>15。CVD被定义为因心血管原因住院或急诊室就诊,比如心绞痛,心肌梗塞,或者充血性心力衰竭.
    完整FGF-23(iFGF-23)水平中位数为423.8pg/mL(四分位距,171-1,443)。FGF-23水平>423.8pg/mL的患者RKF比例明显较低(39.2%vs.60.1%,P<0.001)和左心室舒张功能障碍的比例更高(54。1%vs.29.1%,P<0.001)比iFGF-23水平≤423.8pg/mL的那些。在患有RFK的患者中,LV舒张功能障碍的比值比(OR)显著更高(自然对数转换的iFGF-23水平每增加一个单位,1.80;95%置信区间[CI]:1.11-2.93)比没有RKF的患者(自然对数转换的iFGF-23水平每增加一个单位的OR:1.42;95%CI:1.01-1.99)在多变量分析中(p<0.001)。在后续期间,55例患者经历了CVD。在患有RKF的患者中,CVD发展的风险比(HR)也显着更高(自然对数转化的iFGF-23水平每增加一个单位的HR,2.64;95%CI:1.29-5.40)比没有RKF的那些(自然对数转换的iFGF-23水平每增加一个单位的HR:1.44;95%CI:1.04-1.99)多变量分析(p=0.05)。
    在接受血液透析的患者中,iFGF-23水平升高与LV舒张功能障碍和CVD发展相关;然而,RKF的丢失减弱了这些关联的大小。因此,在这些患者中,RKF强烈影响iFGF-23在CVD发展中的有害作用。
    In patients undergoing incident hemodialysis, increased fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) levels are associated with the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the influence of residual kidney function (RFK) on this association is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between FGF-23 levels, RKF, and CVD in patients undergoing prevalent hemodialysis.
    This cross-sectional and longitudinal observational study included 296 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis for at least three months who were followed up for a median of 44 months. RKF was defined as 24-h urine output >200 mL, left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction as E/E\' >15 on echocardiographic parameters. CVD was defined as hospitalization or emergency room visits due to cardiovascular causes, such as angina, myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure.
    The median intact FGF-23 (iFGF-23) level was 423.8 pg/mL (interquartile range, 171-1,443). Patients with an FGF-23 level > 423.8 pg/mL significantly had a lower proportion of RKF (39.2% vs. 60.1%, P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of LV diastolic dysfunction (54. 1% vs. 29.1%, P < 0.001) than those with an iFGF-23 level ≤ 423.8 pg/mL. The odds ratio (OR) for LV diastolic dysfunction was significantly higher in patients with RFK (OR per one-unit increase in the natural log-transformed iFGF-23 levels, 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.93) than in patients without RKF (OR per one-unit increase in the natural log-transformed iFGF-23 levels: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.01-1.99) in multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, 55 patients experienced CVD. The hazard ratio (HR) for CVD development was also significantly higher in patients with RKF (HR per one-unit increase in the natural log-transformed iFGF-23 levels, 2.64; 95% CI: 1.29-5.40) than those without RKF (HR per one-unit increase in the natural log-transformed iFGF-23 levels: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.04-1.99) in multivariate analysis (p = 0.05).
    Increased iFGF-23 levels were associated with LV diastolic dysfunction and CVD development in patients undergoing prevalent hemodialysis; however, the loss of RKF attenuated the magnitude of these associations. Therefore, in these patients, RKF strongly influenced the detrimental role of iFGF-23 in the development of CVD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:大多数肾衰竭患者每周三次开始并继续血液透析(HD)。增量启动(定义为每周少于三次的HD)越来越被认为是安全且负担较少,但对患者的观点知之甚少。我们旨在描述患者对增量HD的优先事项和关注。
    未经证实:目前患者,以前,或即将在澳大利亚接受HD治疗的患者参加了两个90分钟的在线研讨会,讨论关于HD的观点,重点是逐步开始和试验结果的优先事项.使用主题分析对成绩单进行分析。结果是根据参与者的优先级分数(即,最重要的是单次分配3分,2为第二,和1表示第三重要的结果)。
    UNASSIGNED:所有26名参与者(1名护理人员和25名患者)更喜欢增量式HD方法。最优先考虑的结果是生活质量(QOL)(56分),残余肾功能(RKF)(27分),死亡率(16分)。以下4个主题是结果优先事项的基础,经验,并确定了安全问题:(I)缺乏适应的准备和压力,(ii)日常生活受到干扰,(iii)对安全的威胁,(四)希望和未来规划。
    UNASSIGNED:肾衰竭患者更喜欢渐进式开始治疗HD,以最大程度地减少对日常生活的干扰并减少对其教育的负面影响。工作能力,和家庭生活。QOL是最重要的结果,其次是RKF和生存。
    UNASSIGNED: Most patients with kidney failure commence and continue hemodialysis (HD) thrice weekly. Incremental initiation (defined as HD less than thrice weekly) is increasingly considered to be safe and less burdensome, but little is known about patients\' perspectives. We aimed to describe patients\' priorities and concerns regarding incremental HD.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients currently, previously, or soon to be receiving HD in Australia participated in two 90-minute online workshops to discuss views about HD focusing on incremental start and priorities for trial outcomes. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Outcomes were ranked on the basis of the sum of participants\' priority scores (i.e., single allocation of 3 points for most important, 2 for second, and 1 for third most important outcome).
    UNASSIGNED: All 26 participants (1 caregiver and 25 patients) preferred an incremental HD approach. The top prioritized outcomes were quality of life (QOL) (56 points), residual kidney function (RKF) (27 points), and mortality (16 points). The following 4 themes underpinning outcome priorities, experience, and safety concerns were identified: (i) unpreparedness and pressure to adapt, (ii) disruption to daily living, (iii) threats to safety, and (iv) hope and future planning.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with kidney failure preferred an incremental start to HD to minimize disruption to daily living and reduce the negative impacts on their education, ability to work, and family life. QOL was the most critically important outcome, followed by RKF and survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号