UNASSIGNED: Psoriasis is a highly debilitating chronic inflammatory disease. Increased understanding of its pathophysiology has enabled development of targeted treatments such as biologics. Several medical treatments have been shown to be influenced by patients\' experiences and expectations. However, only little is known about patients\' experiences with and expectations towards biologics. Our objectives were to identify patients\' treatment experiences and treatment expectations and assess their trajectories over the course of treatment with the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab. Moreover, we aimed to document effects of psoriasis, factors that influence symptomatology, and prior treatment experiences.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 24 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and employed a qualitative content analysis to derive thematic and evaluative codes. Findings were validated via peer debriefings with experienced dermatologists.
UNASSIGNED: Patients reported burdensome physical and psychological psoriasis symptoms and identified factors that can improve or worsen symptomatology, including stress and self-efficacy. Prior treatment experiences were mostly negative. Past barriers to effective treatment included time constraints or limited access. Concerning secukinumab, patients initially expected complete to partial remission of symptoms and occurrence or absence of side effects. Closer inspection of expectations and experiences revealed three trajectories. For most patients, initial expectations were met and future expectations remained unchanged. For the other patients, however, the experience did not match their initial expectation. One group then adapted their future expectations according to their experience, while the other group did not.
UNASSIGNED: To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to assess expectations towards treatment effectiveness and side effects, their trajectories, and interplay with experiences among psoriasis patients. Our findings highlight the value of further research on the subject in order to optimize care for psoriasis patients and to learn more about the trajectories and influence of treatment expectations in general.
Patients’ expectations towards a certain treatment can influence how well it will work and whether side effects occur or not. Such effects have been shown for a wide range of conditions, including dermatological ones. For patients suffering from psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, modern biologics offer promising treatment options. Therefore, modern biologics are likely associated with high expectations by patients. Yet, the roles of treatment expectations and the experiences of patients undergoing biologic treatment have only received little attention to date. With this qualitative study, we aimed to understand patients’ perspectives on these treatments, the symptoms they suffer from, expectations towards treatment effectiveness and side effects as well as treatment experiences in the past and over the course of treatment with a modern biologic. To this end, we conducted and transcribed interviews with 24 patients after several months of biologic treatment. We then analyzed interview transcripts to determine underlying categories and summarized these in a common framework. We found that patients’ debilitating physical and psychological symptoms were often not well controlled in past treatments. Still, patients had positive expectations with regard to biologic treatment. For a large group of patients, their actual experiences met their expectations, leaving them with unchanged expectations for the future. Another important finding was the good understanding of factors influencing their symptomatology that patients had, like stress and self-efficacy. The reported findings may aid doctors in their clinical work, to further improve care for psoriasis patients.

Health-related quality of life is a key contributor to overall well-being, and this is becoming an increasingly prominent factor when making therapeutic choices in the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Progress in available therapeutic strategies for AAV has resulted in this historically acute disease with a potentially fatal short-term outcome, becoming a relapsing-remitting chronic disorder. This new perspective on AAV means that patient survival should no longer be considered as the only major treatment target. Additional outcomes in this context that should be portrayed in order to consider a therapeutic approach as successful include patient quality of life, as well as the burden of treatment-induced morbidity. Comorbidities and impaired quality of life in patients with AAV, as with many other autoimmune diseases, may be a consequence of the disease itself as well as a result of the therapy employed. The AAV disease process may induce organ damage, including kidney failure and structural lung damage, and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. On top of this, treatments employed to manage the disease may contribute further to the overall comorbidities burden. Furthermore, pre-existing comorbidities can increase AAV severity and may also be contraindications that limit potential therapeutic options. Quality of life is another central topic that can have a huge impact on patient wellbeing as well as adherence to treatment. Ongoing monitoring of comorbidity risk and of quality of life is thus key for successful AAV management. This process, however, may be complicated; the identification of the correct parameters on which to focus is not always straightforward and, more importantly, it is sometimes the symptoms that may appear trivial to physicians that are most detrimental to a patient\'s quality of life. With these shifts in treatment capabilities and understanding of patient burden, it is necessary to adjust the treatment paradigm accordingly. Treatment success is no longer defined solely by the control of disease activity; treatment success requires holistic improvement determined through the assessment of all aspects of the disease, ranging from disease control to comorbidity risk through to the assessment of health-related quality of life. This review explores the burden of AAV itself as well as treatment-related side effects with a special focus on the tools available to measure outcomes. The management of AAV has entered a new era with a strong focus on both the management and prevention of comorbidities as well as patient-reported outcomes, both of which are now considered key factors in defining treatment success.

BACKGROUND: Patients with uncommon genetic conditions often face limited in-person resources for social and informational support. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) is a rare or underdiagnosed hereditary disorder of the connective tissue, and like those with similar diseases, patients with hEDS have begun to turn to social media in search of care and community. The aims of our study were to understand the usage habits and perceptions of utility of social media use for patients with hEDS in order to formulate suggestions for how clinicians may best engage these and similar patient populations about this topic.
METHODS: We conducted both a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews with patients who had received a robust clinical diagnosis of hEDS.
RESULTS: Twenty-four individuals completed the initial survey, and a subset of 21 of those participants completed an interview. Through thematic analysis, we identified four primary themes related to their experience with social media: (1) befriending others with their disease, (2) seeking and vetting information, (3) the risks and downsides of social media use, and (4) the desire for clinicians to discuss this topic with them.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude by proposing five suggestions that emerge empirically from our data. These proposals will help clinicians engage their patients regarding social media use in order to promote its potential benefits and circumvent its potential harms as they pursue support for their hereditary condition.

BACKGROUND: The International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS) is a global initiative aimed to assess the impact and burden of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and identify the unmet needs from the patient\'s perspective.
METHODS: IMAS is a collaboration between the Axial Spondyloarthritis International Federation (ASIF), the University of Seville, Novartis Pharma AG and steered by a scientific committee. IMAS collected information through an online cross-sectional survey (2017-2022) from unselected patients with axSpA from Europe, Asia, North America, Latin America and Africa who completed a comprehensive questionnaire containing over 120 items.
RESULTS: 5557 patients with axSpA participated in IMAS. Mean age was 43.9 ±12.8 years, 55.4% were female, 46.2% had a university education and 51.0% were employed. The mean diagnostic delay was 7.4 ±9.0 years (median: 4.0), and the mean symptom duration was 17.1 ±13.3 years. 75.0% of patients had active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index ≥4), and 59.4% reported poor mental health (12-item General Health Questionnaire ≥3). In the year before the survey, patients had visited primary care physicians 4.6 times and the rheumatologist 3.6 times. 78.6% had taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ever, 48.8% biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 43.6% conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients\'s greatest fear was disease progression (55.9%), while the greatest hope was to be able to relieve pain (54.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: IMAS shows the global profile of patients with axSpA, highlighting unmet needs, lengthy delays in diagnosis and high burden of disease in patients with axSpA worldwide. This global information will enable more detailed investigations to obtain evidence on the critical issues that matter to patients around the world to improve their care and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: This article is co-authored by a patient with BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma and his treating oncologist.
METHODS: The patient describes how he coped with his diagnosis and treatment. He details the pathway of his melanoma treatment, which has spanned over 10 years, including surgical interventions, medical treatment, and participation in clinical trials. He relates his experience of living with the disease-and the adverse effects of treatment-in the long term. The clinical perspective of his treating oncologist reviews the diagnostic process and explains how the therapeutic options were selected for and with the patient. The oncologist also addresses the integration of the patient into clinical trials involving programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Challenges related to the adverse effects that occurred and the personalised treatment of the patient are also discussed. Finally, the article evaluates current advances in treatment and future therapeutic approaches.
CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the challenges of identifying which therapeutic options are most appropriate for individual patients with BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma.
About half of all people with melanoma have a BRAFV600E gene mutation. Targeted therapies called BRAF inhibitors may be appropriate; such treatment can rapidly suppress melanoma growth and control the tumour in many patients. Immunotherapies, such as pembrolizumab, have emerged for patients with melanoma that has spread to other parts of the body. Triple combination therapy with a BRAF inhibitor, a MEK inhibitor plus pembrolizumab, can extend the therapeutic effects of BRAF/MEK inhibition, but also cause immune-related adverse events (mainly involving the gut, skin, liver, and lung). Steroids that treat these adverse events may reduce the antitumour response. This article concerns a patient who has lived with BRAFV600E-mutant melanoma for over 10 years and illustrates the situation from the perspective of both the patient and his oncologist. The patient describes how he coped with his diagnosis and treatment challenges, and his melanoma treatment pathway, including surgical interventions, medical treatment, and participation in clinical trials. He relates his experience of living with the disease and the adverse effects of treatment. The patient’s oncologist reviews the diagnostic process and explains how the therapeutic options were selected for and with the patient. The oncologist also addresses the integration of the patient into clinical trials involving programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Challenges related to the adverse effects that occurred and the personalised treatment of the patient are discussed. This partnership encouraged the patient to stay on treatment, enjoy a good quality of life, care for his family, and ultimately enter complete remission.

Supervised injectable opioid treatment (SIOT) is a promising alternative for people living with opioid use disorder (OUD) who have not sufficiently benefitted from oral opioid substitution treatment. Yet, SIOT utilization remains limited in Germany. We propose that this is due to beliefs, or schemas, on SIOT among people living with OUD. Drawing from medical sociology and social psychology, this study explores the emergence and evolution of such schemas on SIOT.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 34 individuals currently in or eligible for SIOT in two German outpatient treatment facilities and paralleled an inductive qualitative content analysis with the exploration of individual cases.
The analysis revealed that peer-to-peer interaction and individuals\' practical experiences in therapy are crucial in constructing and changing idiosyncratic and shared schemas of SIOT. When facing ambiguous information, cognitive strategies like subtyping served to mitigate uncertainty.
This research has important practical implications for integrating experiential knowledge into clinical care and improve information sharing among people living with OUD. A nuanced understanding of the complex network of informal advice-seeking and -giving among people living with OUD is indispensable to adequately expand treatment modalities of proven effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Implementing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure and evaluate health outcomes is increasing worldwide. Along with this emerging trend, it is important to identify which guidelines, frameworks, checklists, and recommendations exist, and if and how they have been used in implementing PROMs, especially in clinical quality registries (CQRs).
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify existing publications, as well as publications that discuss the application of actual guidelines, frameworks, checklists, and recommendations on PROMs\' implementation for various purposes such as clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs. In addition, the identified publications will be used to guide the development of a new guideline for PROMs\' implementation in CQRs, which is the aim of the broader project.
METHODS: A literature search of the databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be conducted since the inception of the databases, in addition to using Google Scholar and gray literature to identify literature for the scoping review. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used for all phases of screening. Existing publications of guidelines, frameworks, checklists, recommendations, and publications discussing the application of those methodologies for implementing PROMs in clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs will be included in the final review. Data relating to bibliographic information, aim, the purpose of PROMs use (clinical trial, practice, or registries), name of guideline, framework, checklist and recommendations, the rationale for development, and their purpose and implications will be extracted. Additionally, for publications of actual methodologies, aspects or domains of PROMs\' implementation will be extracted. A narrative synthesis of included publications will be conducted.
RESULTS: The electronic database searches were completed in March 2024. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction will be completed in May 2024. The review is expected to be completed by the end of August 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this scoping review will provide evidence on any existing methodologies and tools for PROMs\' implementation in clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs. It is anticipated that the publications will help us guide the development of a new guideline for PROMs\' implementation in CQRs.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022366085; https://tinyurl.com/bdesk98x.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/52572.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant advances in the management of lung cancer, patients continue to experience a high burden of unmet need impacting quality of life and outcomes of care. Achieving value-based health care, where investment is targeted to services that deliver optimal experience and outcomes of care relative to the cost of delivering that care, requires attention to what people value most in meeting their needs. To date there has been little attention to what matters most to patients with lung cancer (i.e., what they value) as a component of achieving value-based cancer care. This qualitative study was undertaken to investigate components of care valued by people with lung cancer in Australia.
METHODS: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with 23 people with lung cancer. Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy from two metropolitan tertiary public health services. Data collected included demographic characteristics and patient perspectives regarding their priority concerns and components of care identified as most valuable in meeting their needs. Demographic characteristics of participants were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed thematically using Interpretive Description.
RESULTS: Data analysis generated three key themes: valued components of care; benefits of receiving valued care components and consequences of missed opportunities for care. The components of care valued by patients reflect the core dimensions of cancer supportive care, with particular emphasis on ongoing opportunities for consultation (screening for unmet needs) and provision of person-centred information. The facilitation of trust between patients and their treating team, as a consequence of having these valued components evident in their care, was identified as a key characteristic of value-based care.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified valued components of care described by people with lung cancer. Importantly, the care components identified have been proven to improve access to and coordination of care, and demonstrate the importance of integrating supportive care into care provision to achieve value-based cancer care.
UNASSIGNED: This study was informed by perspectives of lung cancer patients who participated in semistructured interviews. We acknowledge that this contribution does not meet the criteria for patient and public involvement in research as defined by Health Expectations, but this study forms part of a larger program of cancer supportive care work being undertaken by this team, where comprehensive consumer engagement and co-design approaches are embedded in our work.

UNASSIGNED: among the 1-1.5 billion persons with hypertension globally only, 20-30% have controlled blood pressure (BP). The most important problem identified is non-adherence to treatment, i.e., failure to change lifestyle and to take prescribed medication. Knowledge about the reasons for this is limited.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to explore people\'s experiences of having hypertension.
UNASSIGNED: Inductive design based on qualitative interviews.
UNASSIGNED: The south of Sweden.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve adults diagnosed with hypertension and treated in primary care were interviewed.
UNASSIGNED: The transcribed interviews were analysed using content analysis, which rendered three categories.
UNASSIGNED: The individuals adapted to their diagnosis in different ways. Collaboration with the staff gave security, but the persons still perceived anxiety and uncertainty.
UNASSIGNED: To meet the needs of people with hypertension, strategies such as person-centred counselling and care, using digital interventions, following national guidelines and starting nurse-led clinics, may be of help. These strategies can give a foundation for increased self-efficacy, which is crucial for persons to be able to change lifestyle and adhere to prescribed medication in order to achieve BP control.

Patients with cancer considering immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy often look for health information and peer support through online communities. The authors used social media content analysis to obtain the perspectives of patients receiving ICI treatment about immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with particular focus on rheumatological symptoms. The most reported rheumatic symptom was joint pain. Other commonly reported symptoms included muscle pain, joint stiffness, arthritis, myositis, bone pain, back pain, and tendon/ligament pain. A few users reported development of rheumatic diseases. The authors\' analyses allowed for cataloging and assessment of patient and caregiver experiences with ICI therapy and rheumatic irAEs.