patient perspective

患者视角
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本定性系统综述和meta汇总旨在综合有关患者认知的证据,从业者,和利益相关者关于使用氟化银二胺(SDF)管理龋齿。
    方法:本综述报告与系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)一致,并在PROSPERO(CRD42023390301)和JoannaBriggs系统评价注册。
    方法:从PubMed检索参考文献,WebofScience,Scopus,和EMBASE使用预先建立的搜索策略。
    方法:定性和混合方法研究检查患者的观点,从业者,和/或利益相关者对SDF的使用也包括在内。最初的搜索确定了650篇符合入选条件的文章,其中14篇文章被纳入审查。审稿人综合了发现,并产生了11个不同的类别,分为三个综合发现:1)临床使用;2)染色;3)促进者和障碍。
    结论:从业者和患者认为SDF是一种具有多重益处的治疗选择。虽然审美问题可能是一些群体的障碍,接受治疗受到其他因素的影响,比如相信专业的建议。
    结论:患者教育是提高SDF接受度的关键。这项系统评价可以帮助临床医生解决有关SDF治疗的问题。研究结果有可能通过以患者为中心的医疗保健模式为解决口腔健康不平等的政策决定提供信息。
    OBJECTIVE: This qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation aimed to synthesise evidence regarding perceptions of patients, practitioners, and stakeholders on the use of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) for the management of dental caries.
    METHODS: This review was reported in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023390301) and the Joanna Briggs Systematic Reviews register.
    METHODS: References were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE using a pre-established search strategy.
    METHODS: Qualitative and mixed-methods studies examining perspectives of patients, practitioners, and/or stakeholders on the use of SDF were included. The initial search identified 650 articles eligible for inclusion, out of which 14 articles were included in the review. Reviewers synthesised findings and generated 11 distinct categories grouped into three synthesised findings: 1) Clinical use; 2) Staining; 3) Facilitators and barriers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners and patients viewed SDF as a therapeutic option with multiple benefits. While aesthetic concerns may be a barrier to some groups, the acceptance of the treatment was influenced by other factors, such as trusting professional advice.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patient education is key for increased SDF acceptance. This systematic review can assist clinicians in addressing concerns regarding SDF therapy. Findings have the potential to inform policy decisions that address oral health inequities through patient-centred health care models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:先前的工作确定了六个关键的价值要素(治疗属性和期望的结果),为患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的人管理他们的病情:治疗模式,帮助治疗的时间,MDD救济,工作质量,与他人互动,和负担能力。我们研究的目的是确定以前的MDD治疗成本效益分析(CEA)是否解决了这些价值因素。次要目标是确定是否有任何研究涉及患者,家庭成员,模型开发过程中的护理人员。
    方法:我们进行了系统的文献综述,以确定已发布的基于模型的CEA。我们将已发表研究的要素与先前工作中得出的MDD患者价值要素进行了比较,以确定未来研究的差距和领域。
    结果:在86个已发布的CEA中,我们发现七个包括病人自付费用,32包括生产率的衡量标准,这两个都是MDD患者的优先事项。我们发现,只有两项研究从患者那里获得了模型的度量,而两项研究则使患者参与了建模过程。
    结论:已发布的用于MDD治疗的CEA模型通常不包括作为该患者群体优先考虑的价值元素,他们在建模过程中也不包括患者。需要能够适应与患者经验一致的元素的灵活模型,并且多利益相关者参与方法将有助于实现这一目标。
    OBJECTIVE: Prior work identified 6 key value elements (attributes of treatment and desired outcomes) for individuals living with major depressive disorder (MDD) in managing their condition: mode of treatment, time to treatment helpfulness, MDD relief, quality of work, interaction with others, and affordability. The objective of our study was to identify whether previous cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) for MDD treatment addressed any of these value elements. A secondary objective was to identify whether any study engaged patients, family members, and caregivers in the model development process.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify published model-based CEAs. We compared the elements of the published studies with the MDD patient value elements elicited in prior work to identify gaps and areas for future research.
    RESULTS: Of 86 published CEAs, we found that 7 included patient out-of-pocket costs, and 32 included measures of productivity, which were both priorities for individuals with MDD. We found that only 2 studies elicited measures from patients for their model, and 2 studies engaged patients in the modeling process.
    CONCLUSIONS: Published CEA models for MDD treatment do not regularly include value elements that are a priority for this patient population nor do they include patients in their modeling process. Flexible models that can accommodate elements consistent with patient experience are needed, and a multistakeholder engagement approach would help accomplish this.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)的特征是疾病活动的间歇性爆发,对患者的生活有显著影响。然而,患者和医疗保健提供者可能会以不同的方式区分耀斑和日常症状变化,治疗RA时可能会阻碍共同决策。
    目的:为全面概述已发表文献中报告的RA耀斑定义,并根据定性证据将这些与患者对耀斑概念的看法进行比较。
    方法:8月30日进行了系统检索,2022年,并于9月30日更新,2023年,用于报告RA背景下的“耀斑”或相关术语的定量和定性研究。我们搜索了以下数据库:Pubmed,EMBASE,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,和CINAHL。对定量研究中报告的RA耀斑的定义进行了描述性总结。并行,进行了定性研究的主题综合,以概述患者对耀斑概念的看法,并将这些与当前使用的定义进行比较。
    结果:在32,864条潜在合格记录中,包括304项研究,其中5人使用定性/混合方法研究患者对耀斑的看法。值得注意的是,报告了62种不同的RA耀斑定义,许多研究报告不止一个。最常用的定义(54%)基于疾病活动指数,基于DAS28的定义应用最广泛(84%)。对于每个疾病活动指数,使用了几种不同的截止来定义耀斑。基于医生报告的各种定义适用于24%的病例,而患者报告的标准仅占应用定义的15%.定性/混合方法研究的主题综合强调了耀斑对患者生活的多维影响,产生了五个连续的总体主题:“与RA一起生活:一种平衡的行为”,\“耀斑:这种平衡的干扰\”,“耀斑的生物心理社会影响”,“自我管理:第一道防线”和“医疗帮助:最后的手段”。反过来,这五个主题以“不确定性和可变性”为中心主题。
    结论:我们在已发表的文献中发现了关于RA耀斑的概念化和测量的显著异质性。尽管定性证据强调了耀斑对患者健康的巨大影响,大多数报告的耀斑定义不是基于患者报告.有必要通过调整患者和医疗保健专业人员对与RA一起生活时耀斑与可接受的症状变异性的区别来弥合这一差距。
    BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by intermittent flares of disease activity with a significant impact on patients\' lives. However, distinguishing flare from daily symptom variation may be approached differently by patients and healthcare providers, potentially hampering shared decision-making when treating RA.
    OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive overview of RA flare definitions reported in the published literature, and to compare these with patients\' perceptions of the flare concept according to qualitative evidence.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on August 30th, 2022, and updated on September 30th, 2023, for both quantitative and qualitative studies reporting \"flare\" or related terms in the context of RA. We searched the following databases: Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Definitions of RA flare reported in quantitative studies were summarized descriptively. In parallel, a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies was performed to outline patients\' views on the concept of flare, and to compare these with the currently used definitions.
    RESULTS: Among 32,864 potentially eligible records, 304 studies were included, 5 of which used qualitative/mixed methods to study patients\' perceptions of flare. Remarkably, 62 different definitions for RA flare were reported, with many studies reporting more than one. The most commonly used definitions (54 %) were based on disease activity indices, with DAS28-based definitions the most widely applied (84 %). For each of the disease activity indices, several different cutoffs to define flares were used. Various definitions based on physician report were applied in 24 % of cases, while patient-reported criteria represented only 15 % of the applied definitions. Thematic synthesis of the qualitative/mixed-methods studies highlighted the multidimensional impact of flares on patients\' lives, resulting in five sequential overarching themes: \"Living with RA: a balancing act\", \"Flare: a disturbance of this balance\", \"The biopsychosocial impact of flares\", \"Self-management: the first line of defense\", and \"Medical help: the last resort\". In turn, these five themes were underpinned by a central theme of \"Uncertainty and variability\".
    CONCLUSIONS: We found a striking heterogeneity regarding the conceptualization and measurement of RA flare in the published literature. Although qualitative evidence highlighted the considerable impact of flares on patients\' wellbeing, the majority of reported flare definitions were not based on patient report. There is a need to bridge this gap by aligning patients\' and healthcare professionals\' views on what distinguishes a flare from acceptable symptom variability when living with RA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内实施患者报告结果测量(PROM)来测量和评估健康结果正在增加。随着这一新兴趋势,重要的是要确定哪些准则,框架,清单,和建议存在,以及它们是否以及如何用于实施PROM,特别是在临床质量登记处(CQR)。
    目的:这篇综述旨在确定现有的出版物,以及讨论实际指南应用的出版物,框架,清单,以及为临床试验等各种目的实施PROM的建议,临床实践,和CQR。此外,确定的出版物将用于指导在CQR中实施PROM的新指南的制定,这是更广泛项目的目标。
    方法:对MEDLINE数据库进行文献检索,Embase,CINAHL,PsycINFO,和Cochrane中央对照试验登记册将自数据库建立以来进行,除了使用谷歌学者和灰色文献来识别用于范围审查的文献。预定义的纳入和排除标准将用于筛选的所有阶段。现有的准则出版物,框架,清单,recommendations,和出版物讨论了这些方法在临床试验中实施PROM的应用,临床实践,和CQR将包括在最终审查中。与书目信息有关的数据,目标,PROM使用的目的(临床试验,实践,或注册表),准则名称,框架,清单和建议,发展的理由,它们的目的和含义将被提取出来。此外,对于实际方法的出版物,将提取PROM实施的方面或域。将对所包括的出版物进行叙述性综合。
    结果:电子数据库搜索于2024年3月完成。标题和摘要筛选,全文筛选,数据提取将于2024年5月完成。审查预计将于2024年8月底完成。
    结论:本次范围审查的结果将为在临床试验中实施PROM的任何现有方法和工具提供证据,临床实践,和CQR。预计这些出版物将帮助我们指导在CQR中实施PROM的新指南的制定。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42022366085;https://tinyurl.com/bdesk98x。
    DERR1-10.2196/52572。
    BACKGROUND: Implementing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure and evaluate health outcomes is increasing worldwide. Along with this emerging trend, it is important to identify which guidelines, frameworks, checklists, and recommendations exist, and if and how they have been used in implementing PROMs, especially in clinical quality registries (CQRs).
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify existing publications, as well as publications that discuss the application of actual guidelines, frameworks, checklists, and recommendations on PROMs\' implementation for various purposes such as clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs. In addition, the identified publications will be used to guide the development of a new guideline for PROMs\' implementation in CQRs, which is the aim of the broader project.
    METHODS: A literature search of the databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be conducted since the inception of the databases, in addition to using Google Scholar and gray literature to identify literature for the scoping review. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used for all phases of screening. Existing publications of guidelines, frameworks, checklists, recommendations, and publications discussing the application of those methodologies for implementing PROMs in clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs will be included in the final review. Data relating to bibliographic information, aim, the purpose of PROMs use (clinical trial, practice, or registries), name of guideline, framework, checklist and recommendations, the rationale for development, and their purpose and implications will be extracted. Additionally, for publications of actual methodologies, aspects or domains of PROMs\' implementation will be extracted. A narrative synthesis of included publications will be conducted.
    RESULTS: The electronic database searches were completed in March 2024. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction will be completed in May 2024. The review is expected to be completed by the end of August 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this scoping review will provide evidence on any existing methodologies and tools for PROMs\' implementation in clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs. It is anticipated that the publications will help us guide the development of a new guideline for PROMs\' implementation in CQRs.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022366085; https://tinyurl.com/bdesk98x.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/52572.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:康复学院(RC)代表了一种通过教育提高心理健康的方法,生活经验和联合制作。尽管他们的存在越来越多,很少有文献探讨RC的可操作性及其共同生产原理的体现。本范围审查的目的是调查RC的可操作性及其在过去十年中在高收入国家的RC中联合生产的应用。
    方法:采用既定的范围审查方法,在七个学术数据库中进行了搜索。10项主要研究符合纳入标准。此外,与利益相关者进行了协商,以验证主题并发现知识差距。
    结果:研究结果表明,RCs本质上是特质的,适应当地环境。关于其最佳机构背景和定位以及对诸如“恢复”和“联合制作”等关键术语的解释的讨论仍然存在,影响日常运营和利益相关者参与。围绕根据保真度标准衡量成功的挑战强调了对RC价值和可持续性有更广泛理解的必要性。
    结论:这篇综述提供了现有文献的概要,提供了有关RC可操作性的见解。通过各种初级研究的综合,它系统地识别和描述了RC景观中的操作细微差别以及支撑RC操作的基本要素,同时揭示了研究和实践中的关键知识差距。所以呢?:这篇评论强调了对RC价值和可持续性有更广泛理解的重要性,为心理健康和福祉领域的研究和实践提供见解。这篇综述强调了进一步探索和完善RC运营的重要性,以增强其在支持心理健康方面的有效性和影响。
    BACKGROUND: Recovery Colleges (RCs) represent an approach to enhancing mental wellbeing through education, lived experience and co-production. Despite their increasing presence, scant literature explores the operationalisation of RCs and their embodiment of co-production principles. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate the operationalisation of RCs and their application of co-production in RCs located in high-income countries over the past decade.
    METHODS: Employing an established scoping review methodology, searches were conducted across seven academic databases. Ten primary studies met the inclusion criteria. In addition, stakeholders were consulted to validate themes and uncover knowledge gaps.
    RESULTS: Findings suggest that RCs are inherently idiosyncratic, adapted to suit local contexts. Discussions persist regarding their optimal institutional contexts and positioning and the interpretation of key terms such as \'recovery\' and \'co-production\', influencing daily operations and stakeholder involvement. Challenges surrounding measuring success against fidelity criteria underscore the need for a broader understanding of RC value and sustainability.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review offers a synopsis of the existing literature offering insights concerning the operationalisation of RCs. Through a synthesis of diverse primary studies, it systematically identifies and describes the operational nuances within the RC landscape and the fundamental elements underpinning RC operations, while shedding light on critical knowledge gaps in both research and practice. SO WHAT?: This review underscores the importance of a broader understanding of RC value and sustainability, offering insights for both research and practice in the field of mental health and wellbeing. This review highlights the significance of further exploration and refinement of RC operationalisation to enhance their effectiveness and impact in supporting mental wellbeing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with glomerular disease. Despite the fact that mechanisms underpinning CV disease risk in this population are likely distinct from other forms of kidney disease, treatment and preventive strategies tend to be extrapolated from studies of patients with undifferentiated chronic kidney disease (CKD). There is an unmet need to delineate the pathophysiology of CV disease in patients with glomerular disease, establish unique risk factors, and identify novel therapeutic targets for disease prevention. The aims of this narrative review are to summarize the existing knowledge regarding the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and management of CV disease in patients with common glomerular disease, highlight the patient perspective, and propose specific areas for future study.
    UNASSIGNED: The literature for this narrative review was accessed using common research search engines, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Medline, and Google Scholar. Information for the patient perspective section was collected through iterative discussions with a patient partner.
    UNASSIGNED: We reviewed the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms of disease, management approaches, and the patient perspective in relation to CV disease in patients with glomerulopathies. Throughout, we have highlighted the current knowledge and have discussed future research approaches, both clinical and translational, while integrating the patient perspective.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with glomerular disease have significant CV disease risk driven by multifactorial, molecular mechanisms originating from their glomerular disease but complicated by existing comorbidities, kidney disease, and medication side effects. The current approach to risk stratification and treatment relies heavily on existing data from CKD patients, but this may not always be appropriate given the unique pathophysiology and mechanisms associated with CV disease risk in patients with glomerular disease. We highlight the need for ongoing glomerular disease-focused studies aimed to better delineate CV disease risk, while integrating the patient perspective.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a narrative review and does not represent a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature.
    UNASSIGNED: Les maladies cardiovasculaires sont une cause majeure de morbidité et de mortalité chez les patients atteints d’une maladie glomérulaire. Bien que les mécanismes qui sous-tendent le risque de maladie cardiovasculaire dans cette population sont probablement distincts des autres formes de néphropathies, le traitement et les stratégies préventives ont tendance à être extrapolés à partir d’études portant sur des patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale chronique indifférenciée. Il existe ainsi un besoin de délimiter la physiopathologie des maladies cardiovasculaires chez les patients atteints d’une maladie glomérulaire, d’établir les facteurs de risque propres à la maladie glomérulaire et d’identifier de nouvelles cibles thérapeutiques pour la prévenir. Les objectifs de cette revue narrative sont de résumer les connaissances existantes concernant l’épidémiologie, les mécanismes moléculaires et la prise en charge des maladies cardiovasculaires chez les patients atteints d’une maladie glomérulaire commune, de mettre en évidence le point de vue des patients et de proposer des domaines précis pour de futures études.
    UNASSIGNED: La documentation a été consultée par le biais des moteurs de recherche courants, notamment PubMed, PubMed Central, Medline et Google Scholar. Les points de vue des patients ont été recueillis au moyen de discussions itératives avec un patient partenaire.
    UNASSIGNED: Nous avons examiné l’épidémiologie et les mécanismes moléculaires de la maladie, les approches de prise en charge et la perspective des patients en lien avec les maladies cardiovasculaires chez les patients atteints d’une maladie glomérulaire. Nous avons fait état des connaissances actuelles et discuté des approches à envisager pour les recherches futures, tant cliniques que translationnelles, tout en intégrant la perspective du patient.
    UNASSIGNED: Les patients atteints d’une maladie glomérulaire présentent un risque significatif de maladie cardiovasculaire associé à des mécanismes moléculaires multifactoriels provenant de la maladie glomérulaire elle-même. Ce risque est compliqué par les comorbidités existantes, la néphropathie et les effets secondaires des médicaments. L’approche actuelle de stratification du risque et de traitement repose en grande partie sur les données existantes pour les patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale chronique; cette approche pourrait ne pas toujours convenir, compte tenu de la physiopathologie unique et des mécanismes associés au risque de maladie cardiovasculaire chez les patients atteints d’une maladie glomérulaire. Nos résultats mettent en lumière le besoin d’études continues, axées sur les maladies glomérulaires, qui visent à mieux cerner le risque de maladies cardiovasculaires chez ces patients, tout en intègrant leur point de vue.
    UNASSIGNED: Il s’agit d’une revue narrative; cette étude ne constitue pas une revue exhaustive et systématique de la littérature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:总结一下,解释和综合有关患者和护士在临床实践中护理经验的研究结果。
    背景:护理是护理的普遍要素;然而,经济限制通常会对卫生服务产生负面影响,时间短缺和工作人员数量有限可能是护理遭遇的特征。目前尚不清楚这些背景条件如何影响患者和护士的护理体验。
    方法:这篇综合文献综述涵盖了2000年至2022年间发表的论文。四个数据库-PubMed,PsycINFO(通过Ovid),MEDLINE(通过Ovid)和CINAHL(通过EBSCO)-于2022年5月系统地搜索了合格的论文。对纳入的研究进行了严格评估。进行内容分析以解释和综合研究结果。根据EQUATOR准则,使用了PRISMA2020和PRISMA-S清单。综合审查方法指导了这一过程。
    结果:总计,33项研究纳入审查。三个主题抓住了护理护理的经验:(1)护理环境的复杂性,(2)护士的专业素养,(3)信任的病人-护士关系。
    结论:护理中的护理经验取决于护士在护理背景下的个人接触中的能力和判断力。关怀关系是建立在互惠基础上的,但它仍然不对称,因为护士有权力和责任赋予病人权力。屏障,例如对效率和资源稀缺的需求增加,可能会阻碍护理经验。
    通过促进关于护理护理的持续讨论,护士管理可以系统地支持护士在不同和复杂的临床环境中反思他们的实践。
    由于研究设计,没有患者或公众贡献。
    OBJECTIVE: To summarise, interpret and synthesize research findings on patients\' and nurses\' experiences of caring in nursing across clinical practices.
    BACKGROUND: Caring is a universal element of nursing; however, economic restrictions often negatively impact health services, and time shortages and limited numbers of staff may characterize care encounters. It is unclear how these contextual conditions affect patients\' and nurses\' experiences of caring.
    METHODS: This integrative literature review covers papers published between 2000 and 2022. Four databases-PubMed, PsycINFO (via Ovid), MEDLINE (via Ovid) and CINAHL (via EBSCO)-were systematically searched for eligible papers in May 2022. The included studies were critically appraised. Content analysis was performed to interpret and synthesize the findings. In accordance with the EQUATOR guidelines, the PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S checklists were used. An Integrative review methodology guided the process.
    RESULTS: In total, 33 studies were included in the review. Three themes captured the experiences of caring in nursing: (1) the complexity of the nursing care context, (2) the professionalism of the nurse, and (3) the trusting patient-nurse relationship.
    CONCLUSIONS: The experience of caring in nursing depended on nurses\' competence and discretion in the personal encounter framed by the nursing context. The caring relationship was based on reciprocity, but it remains asymmetrical, as the nurse had the power and responsibility to empower the patient. Barriers, such as increased demands for efficiency and resource scarcity, may hinder the experience of caring in nursing.
    UNASSIGNED: By promoting an ongoing discussion of caring in nursing, nurse management can systematically support nurses in reflecting on their practice in diverse and complex clinical contexts.
    UNASSIGNED: No patient or public contribution was made due to the study design.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:电惊厥治疗(ECT)是一种公认的治疗耐药的干预措施,严重的精神疾病。其可接受性,功效,和耐受性在高收入环境中有很好的记录,但在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的情况就不那么明显了。本报告是对后一种情况下的ECT实践的叙述性回顾。
    方法:使用Medline和PubMed进行文献检索。初步结果产生了81份英文出版物。筛选后,包括19篇论文来评估有关ECT实践和感知的信息。
    结果:来自LMIC的疗效报告,耐受性,对ECT的感知相对稀疏。总的来说,他们确认其主要用于治疗抗性重大精神疾病(即,抑郁症,精神分裂症,双相情感障碍)。使用改良和未改良形式的ECT,并认为同样有效,虽然前者的耐受性更好。由于其低成本和有限的资源需求,未修饰的ECT在LMIC中的使用仍然很重要。总的来说,对ECT及其结果感到满意。对病人和家属的教育,内容过程,和研究被认为是需要改进的领域。
    结论:ECT被认为是LMIC的有效干预措施,但使用未修改的ECT仍然存在争议。有必要制定和使用全球指南,以改善临床医生的培训,与患者及其家人分享知识,和结果研究。
    BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a well-accepted intervention for treatment-resistant, serious mental illnesses. Its acceptability, efficacy, and tolerability are well documented in high-income settings, but less so in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This report is a narrative review of ECT practice in the latter setting.
    METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Medline and PubMed. Initial results yielded 81 publications in English. Following the screening, 19 papers were included to evaluate the information on ECT practice and perceptions.
    RESULTS: Reports from LMICs on efficacy, tolerability, and perceptions of ECT were relatively sparse. In general, they confirm its use mostly for treatment-resistant major mental illnesses (i.e., depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder). Both modified and unmodified forms of ECT are used and considered equally effective, although the former is better tolerated. Use of unmodified ECT remains significant in LMICs due to its low cost and limited resource requirements. In general, there is satisfaction with ECT and its outcomes. The education of patients and families, content process, and research have been noted as areas to improve.
    CONCLUSIONS: ECT is perceived as an effective intervention in LMICs, but use of unmodified ECT remains controversial. There is a need for the development and use of global guidelines to improve clinician training, knowledge sharing with patients and their families, and outcome research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Many studies using Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data have been conducted to monitor symptoms and health-related quality of life during follow-up after cancer treatment. However new ways of using (e)PROs have emerged. We aimed to explore the Danish landscape of the use of PRO in a research setting, where PRO is used actively in cancer patients undergoing treatment, and give an overview of how it is embraced by patients and clinicians.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search was performed in June 2023, using the keywords Denmark, cancer, and patient-reported outcomes. An expert on literature searches identified the search terms, and double screening was performed at both abstract and screening levels and full-text stage. The software tool Covidence was used.
    UNASSIGNED: 467 articles were retrieved and 19 studies were included. They described the type of ePRO instrument used and the application of active ePRO i.e. a dialogue tool in the clinical encounter, release of alerts to clinicians, and enhancement of self-management. Finally, a development in the use of active ePROs over time is elucidated and we show how it is embraced by patients and clinicians.
    UNASSIGNED: This mini-review gives an overview of how ePRO solutions are tested in oncological research in Denmark and embraced by patients and clinicians. ePRO solutions in a Danish setting seem well-suited for self-management. However, if more impact is warranted, clinicians need to engage in reviewing and using ePROs. Moreover, for successful implementation, the integration of ePROs in electronic health records must be supported by IT specialists and management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:关于临床医生沟通的问题仍然是医疗保健领域投诉的重要来源。本系统评价旨在确定癌症患者及其家庭护理人员对哪些临床医生的沟通行为会造成伤害(即引起患者/家庭护理人员的负面感受/后果)的看法。
    方法:我们搜索了所有类型的同行评审研究,这些研究确定了成人(≥18岁)癌症患者和/或家庭护理人员对临床医生沟通行为可能造成伤害的观点在几个数据库中(PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,Emcare,PsycINFO和学术搜索Premier),辅以专家咨询。使用ASReview的人工智能筛选工具筛选研究,并使用主题分析对数据进行分析。为了评估研究的质量,使用了Qualsyst批判性评估工具。
    结果:共纳入47项研究。确定了有害交流行为的四个主要主题:(1)缺乏量身定制的信息提供(例如提供的信息太少或太多/特定信息)(2)缺乏量身定制的决策(范围从;患者排除,对病人的责任,和/或匆忙)(3)缺乏看到和听到的感觉(被视为一种疾病,不是作为一个人;不听关注和情感)(4)缺乏被持有和记住的感觉(被遗忘的协议;缺乏护理连续性)。
    结论:我们的研究结果揭示了患者和家庭照顾者对临床医生沟通行为可能造成伤害的观点的概述。当信息和决策参与量身定做,患者和家庭护理人员需要感受到被看到时,伤害是可以预防的,听说过,举行和记住是满足。
    OBJECTIVE: Issues regarding clinician communication remain an important source of complaints within healthcare. This systematic review aims to determine cancer patients\' and their family caregivers\' views on which clinicians\' communication behaviors can harm (i.e. eliciting negative feelings/consequences for patients/family caregivers).
    METHODS: We searched for all types of peer-reviewed studies that determined adult (≥18 years) cancer patients\' and/or family caregivers\' perspectives on which clinicians\' communication behaviors can harm in several databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier), supplemented by expert-consultation. Studies were screened using the Artificial intelligence screening tool of ASReview and data was analyzed using Thematic Analysis. To assess the quality of the studies the Qualsyst critical appraisal tool was used.
    RESULTS: A total of 47 studies were included. Four main themes of harmful communication behaviors were identified: (1) Lack of tailored information provision (e.g. giving too little or too much/specific information) (2) Lack of tailored decision making (ranging from; patient exclusion, to the patients\' responsibility, and/or haste) (3) Lack of feeling seen and heard (seen as a disease, not as a human being; not listened to concerns and emotions) (4) Lack of feeling held and remembered (forgotten agreements; lack of care continuity).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal an overview of patients\' and family caregivers\' perspectives on which clinicians\' communication behaviors can harm. Harm could be prevented when information and decision involvement are tailored and patients\' and family caregivers\' needs to feel seen, heard, held and remembered are met.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号