UNASSIGNED: Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) encompasses a group of liver diseases with vascular abnormalities that can cause portal hypertension in the absence of cirrhosis. The new diagnostic criteria allow for coexistence with other liver diseases, however its relationship with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess HBV prevalence in a PSVD cohort and evaluate its clinical impact.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study was conducted on patients with PSVD at Hospital Clínic Barcelona. HBV serology was evaluated, and patients were categorized into HBV chronic infection, past infection, or no HBV exposure. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared.
UNASSIGNED: We included 155 patients with PSVD. Prevalence of CHB and past HBV infection in patients with PSVD was higher than in the general population (5.8% vs. 0.5%, p <0.0001 and 20% vs. 9.1%, p <0.0001, respectively). Patients with CHB had a significant delay in PSVD diagnosis compared to those without CHB (11 [5-25] vs. 1 [0-3] years, p = 0.002) and had a more advanced disease (MELD score 12 [9-17] vs. 9 [7-11], p = 0.012) at the time of PSVD diagnosis. The clinical evolution of PSVD in patients with CHB was marked by a significantly higher transplantation rate at the last follow-up (33% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Recognizing the coexistence of PSVD and CHB is important for timely diagnosis and optimal management, highlighting the potential benefits of specialized care for potentially improved outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: The new diagnostic criteria for porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) allow for coexistence with other liver diseases. The results of the present study highlight, for the first time, a non-negligible prevalence of chronic hepatitis B in the PSVD population that was previously unknown. Coexistence may challenge and delay the PSVD diagnosis and is associated with a more unfavorable clinical course. Our findings will increase awareness of this coexistence and improve PSVD diagnosis and management. Furthermore, the data will encourage new studies to determine the prevalence and clinical behavior of other chronic liver diseases that coexist with PSVD.

UNASSIGNED: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. PSC is frequently associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) can occur in IBD with the use or even in the absence of thiopurine treatment. We aimed to study the significance of the presence of NRH and obliterative portal venopathy (OPV), both causes of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH), in patients having PSC.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with PSC and concurrent NRH on liver biopsy were identified from the digital pathology database covering the period 2003-2019. Evaluation of liver biopsy and the original diagnoses were confirmed on review based on standard histological features diagnostic for NRH and OPV. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from electronic medical records.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-one patients (21 male, 10 female; median age at biopsy 40.1 years) were included in the study. Twelve (38.7%) patients had OPV in addition to NRH on the liver biopsy. Nineteen (61.2%) patients had IBD including 11 with Crohn\'s disease (CD), 7 with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 1 with indeterminate colitis. Thirteen (41.9%) patients had evidence of portal hypertension, 10 (32.2%) with esophageal varices, 4 (12.9%) with history of variceal bleeding, 6 (19.3%) with ascites, and 14 (12.9%) with splenomegaly. Eleven (35.4%) patients had a cirrhotic-appearing liver on imaging. Twelve (38.7%) patients had a history of prior or current thiopurine use.
UNASSIGNED: The current study suggests that NRH with or without OPV independently occurs in patients having PSC and may lead to NCPH, even in the absence of concurrent IBD and/or thiopurine therapy.

A 68-year-old woman with stage III colon cancer status after right hemicolectomy and adjuvant FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) chemotherapy was hospitalized for melena and found to have new-onset esophageal and gastric varices on esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Her workup did not reveal an underlying liver disease, but her liver biopsy showed noncirrhotic portal hypertension from obliterative portal venopathy (OPV). The development of OPV is likely from her use of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) have a known prothrombotic effect. Obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) can be seen in patients with underlying hypercoagulability. We present a case of a 19-year-old female patient taking OCPs who presented with obstructive jaundice. Her main concern was pruritis. An extensive workup was done to reach a diagnosis but it came back negative. A liver biopsy showed OPV. This was thought secondary to her OCP use. Her OCPs were discontinued which resulted in a complete resolution of her symptoms and laboratory abnormalities. Cases with a direct relationship between OPV and OCP use are extremely rare. More studies are required to establish a correlation between OPV and OCPs. OPV should be considered in the differential diagnosis among patients with obstructive jaundice without an obvious cause, especially in patients taking OCPs. Treatment is stopping the OCPs with close follow-up to confirm disease resolution.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) and obliterative portal venopathy (OPV), entities that comprise idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH), are under-recognised diseases of uncertain aetiology and the diagnosis can be easily missed on liver biopsy. The expression of CD34 and von Willebrand factor (vWF) in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) and alpha-smooth muscle actin (ASMA) in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) is unknown in NRH and OPV. We sought to investigate the pathogenesis and potential immunomarkers that might aid in making the diagnosis of NRH and OPV.
RESULTS: Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for CD34, vWF and ASMA was performed in clinically and histologically well-characterised NRH (n = 15) and OPV (n = 47) liver specimens. Among the 47 OPV cases, 37 (78.7%) had concurrent features of NRH. CD34 positive staining was mainly confined to small vessels in the portal tracts and LSECs in periportal areas, a finding similar to that in non-NRH/OPV livers. However, expression of vWF in LSECs was positive in the compressed sinusoids of NRH and in a patchy or geographic pattern, particularly prominent in the perivenular areas and dilated sinusoids of OPV cases. HSCs were negative for ASMA in all NRH and OPV cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that NRH may be a subtle but common concurrent morphological feature in OPV. The aberrant expression of vWF in LSECs suggests that endothelial injury may play a role in the pathogenesis, which may thus aid in the recognition and diagnosis of NRH and OPV, particularly when confronted with otherwise apparent normal liver histology on needle biopsy.

Porto sinusoidal vascular liver disease (PSVD) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are distinct vascular liver diseases characterized, respectively, by an intrahepatic and a prehepatic obstacle to the flow in the liver portal system. PVT may also occur as a complication of the natural history of PSVD, especially if a prothrombotic condition coexists. In other cases, it is associated to local and systemic pro-thrombotic conditions, even if its cause remains unknown in up to 25% despite an active search. In our opinion, the presence of PSVD should be suspected in patients with PVT especially in those with PVT \"sine causa\" and the active search of this condition should be included in their diagnostic work-out. However, sometimes the diagnosis of pre-existing PSVD is very hard. Biopsy cannot be fully discriminant as similar histological data have been described in both conditions. Liver stiffness may help as it has been shown to be higher in PSVD than in \"pure\" PVT, due to the presence of sclerosis in the portal venous radicles observable in PSVD patients. Nevertheless, comparing liver stiffness between PVT and PSVD has until now been restricted to very limited series of patients. In conclusion, even if it is still totally hypothetical, our point of view may have clinical consequences, especially when deciding to perform a liver biopsy in patients with a higher liver stiffness and suspending the anticoagulation in patients with PVT and no detectable prothrombotic factors.

In India, an unexplained enteropathy is present in a majority of non-cirrhotic intrahepatic portal hypertension (NCIPH) patients. Small intestinal bacterial contamination and tropical enteropathy could trigger inflammatory stimuli and activate the endothelium in the portal venous system. Groundwater contaminated with arsenic is an environmental factor of epidemic proportions in large areas of India which has similar consequences. Von Willebrand factor (a sticky protein) expressed by activated endothelium may promote formation of platelet microthrombi and occlusion of intrahepatic portal vein branches leading to NCIPH. Environmental factors linked to suboptimal hygiene and sanitation, which enter through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, predispose to platelet plugging onto activated endothelium in portal microcirculation. Thus, NCIPH, an example of poverty linked thrombophilia, is a disease mainly affecting the lower socio-economic strata of Indian population. Public health measures to improve sanitation, provide clean drinking water and eliminate arsenic contamination of drinking water are urgently needed. Till such time as these environmental factors are addressed, NCIPH is likely to remain \'an Indian disease\'.

Cirrhosis is the most common cause of portal hypertension but there are many causes of noncirrhotic portal hypertension. Many of these etiologies may be diagnosed by liver biopsy. Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension is being increasingly diagnosed and has varied histopathological findings as well as overlapping definitions. Many of these histological changes can be subtle, thus making it a challenging diagnosis for the pathologist to make. This review summarizes the clinical aspects of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension and outlines the different definitions and histological features of the entity. In addition, pearls and pitfalls for the pathologist in making this diagnosis are included.