external fixation

外固定
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于桡骨远端骨折(DRF),有许多内固定(IF)选项。固定方法的选择取决于骨折形态等因素,软组织完整性,患者的临床状况,和外科医生的训练。虽然掌侧钢板固定已成为解决这些骨折的主要方法,替代IF方法,如K线固定,碎片特异性固定,和背桥电镀继续有效。尽管IF的多功能性,在某些临床情况下,不适合通过切开复位内固定术(ORIF)进行及时和决定性的治疗.这些例子包括多发性创伤患者的治疗,软组织受损的个体,或那些在医学上不稳定以耐受长时间麻醉的人。在这种情况下,熟练的闭合复位和外固定(EF)证明是非常宝贵的。能够识别这些临床情况并理解EF在解决DRF方面的功效和安全性对于处理此类损伤的任何外科医生都是有价值的。
    There are numerous internal fixation (IF) options available for distal radius fractures (DRFs). The choice of fixation method depends on factors such as fracture morphology, soft tissue integrity, the patient\'s clinical status, and the surgeon\'s training. While volar plate fixation has become the primary approach for addressing these fractures, alternative IF methods like K-wire fixation, fragment-specific fixation, and dorsal bridge plating continue to be effective. Despite the versatility of IF, there are certain clinical situations where prompt and conclusive management through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is not suitable. These instances include the treatment of polytraumatized patients, individuals with compromised soft tissues, or those medically unstable to tolerate lengthy anesthesia. In such cases, proficiency in closed reduction and external fixation (EF) proves invaluable. Being able to identify these clinical scenarios and comprehend the efficacy and safety of EF in addressing DRFs is valuable for any surgeon handling such injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:儿童患者股骨干长度不稳定型骨折(LUFSF)的治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨超声引导下闭合复位结合外固定架治疗儿童LUFSF的临床疗效。
    方法:我们对2018年1月至2023年1月期间接受超声引导下闭合复位和外固定的19例LUFSF儿科患者的临床数据进行了回顾性分析。超声不仅用于促进骨折的闭合复位,而且还用于引导Schanz引脚的实时插入并监测引脚穿过相对皮质的长度。手术时间,术中透视计数,住院时间,骨折固定持续时间,并发症发生率,记录最终随访时的骨折复位质量.
    结果:患者的平均年龄为7.5岁(范围:5至11岁)。平均手术时间为70.4分钟(范围:48-105分钟),术中透视平均计数为6.5(范围:2-16)。骨折固定术7~20周,平均10.9周。所有患者均随访一年以上。6例发生浅表针道感染,通过口服抗生素和加强针道护理解决。未观察到深部感染。在2例患者中观察到膝关节暂时僵硬。根据Flynn的疗效评估系统,最终随访时骨折复位质量优良11例,满意8例,综合成功率为100%(19/19)。
    结论:超声引导下闭合复位结合外固定的技术为5至11岁的LUFSF儿童提供了良好的结果,减少对透视引导的依赖。
    OBJECTIVE: The management of length-unstable femoral shaft fractures(LUFSFs) in pediatric patients is still controversial. This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided closed reduction combined with external fixation for treating LUFSFs in children.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 19 pediatric patients with LUFSFs who underwent ultrasound-guided closed reduction and external fixation between January 2018 and January 2023. Ultrasound was employed not only to facilitate closed reduction of the fracture but also to guide real-time insertion of Schanz pins and monitor pin length as it traversed the opposite cortex. Surgical time, intraoperative fluoroscopy count, hospital stay length, fracture fixation duration, complication incidence, fracture reduction quality at the final follow-up were recorded.
    RESULTS: The patients\' average age was 7.5 years( range: 5 to 11 years). The mean surgical duration was 70.4 min (range: 48-105 min), and the average intraoperative fluoroscopy count was 6.5 (range: 2-16). Fracture fixation lasted an average of 10.9 weeks (range: 7-20 weeks). All patients were followed up for more than one year. 6 cases of superficial pin tract infection occurred, which resolved with oral antibiotics and enhanced needle tract care. No deep infections were observed. Temporary stiffness of the knee joint was observed in 2 patients. According to Flynn\'s efficacy evaluation system, fracture reduction quality at the final follow-up was rated as excellent in 11 cases and satisfactory in 8 cases, yielding a combined success rate of 100% (19/19).
    CONCLUSIONS: The technique of ultrasound-guided closed reduction combined with external fixation offers favorable outcomes for children aged 5 to 11 years with LUFSFs, reducing reliance on fluoroscopic guidance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    牵张成骨技术的风险之一是血管并发症的发展,例如与所进行的截骨术相关的假性动脉瘤或手术中使用的外部固定器的固定元件。假性动脉瘤是在动脉外膜损伤时形成的,导致逐渐和持续的血液外渗到被封装并连接到动脉腔的周围组织中。本报告描述了一例罕见的胫骨前动脉晚期假性动脉瘤,这是由于胫骨延长手术所致,目的是解决一名57岁女性的腿部长度差异,该女性患有长期控制不良导致的严重周围神经病变糖尿病。我们描述了诊断过程,治疗方案,并确认骨痂的形状如何成为这种病理的可靠指标,正如文献中已经描述的那样。
    One of the risks of distraction osteogenesis-based techniques is the development of vascular complications, such as pseudoaneurysms associated with the osteotomies performed or the fixation elements of the external fixator used in the procedure. Pseudoaneurysm are formed when the tunica adventitia of the artery is injured, resulting in a gradual and persistent blood extravasation into the surrounding tissues that is encapsulated and connected to the arterial lumen. This report describes a rare case of a late-presentation pseudoaneurysm in the anterior tibial artery resulting from a tibial lengthening procedure aimed at addressing a leg length discrepancy in a 57-year-old female with severe peripheral neuropathy resulting from long-standing poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. We describe the diagnostic process, the treatment options and confirm how the shape of the bony callus can be a reliable indicator of this pathology, as has already been described in the literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较SchatzkerIV-VI型TPFs患者即刻(随后使用闭合切口负压治疗)与延迟ORIF的结局。
    方法:对2018年1月至2019年12月接受ORIF的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。纳入标准是闭合性骨折患者(>18岁)在受伤后24小时内被送往急诊室(ER)。所有患者均行术前影像评估。两位资深骨科创伤外科医生通过5P的骨筋膜室综合征评估ER的软组织状况,判断最终ORIF的运行时间。第1组(n=16)接受延迟ORIF。第2组(n=16)立即接受ORIF和ciNPT使用。患者在术后2周和6周以及术后3、6和12个月进行随访。评估包括确定固定的时间,住院时间,骨头愈合的时间,手术部位并发症,并在12个月内再次手术。使用通用测角仪测量术后3m,6米,和12米ROM。
    结果:两组患者的人口统计学相似(p>0.05)。第2组显示明确固定的时间明显较短(5.94±2.02vs.0.61±0.28,p<0.0001)和住院时间(14.90±8/78vs.10.30±6.78,p=0.0016)。骨愈合时间没有观察到显著差异,手术部位并发症发生率,再次手术率(p>0.05)。术后第2、3、6和12个月,屈伸膝关节ROM显著改善(p<0.0001)。
    结论:在这项研究中,早期使用ORIF和ciNPT导致住院时间缩短,缩短了膝盖早期主动运动的时间,和改善膝盖ROM。这些结果表明,早期ORIF与ciNPT用于SchatzkerIV-VI型TPFs在某些患者中是安全有效的。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现在更大和更多样化的人群中.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the outcomes of immediate (followed by closed-incision negative-pressure therapy use) versus delayed ORIF in patients with Schatzker type IV-VI TPFs.
    METHODS: A prospective study of patients undergoing ORIF between January 2018 and December 2019 was performed. The inclusion criteria were patients (>18 years) with a closed fracture sent to the emergency room (ER) within 24 h of injury. All the patients underwent preoperative image evaluation. Two senior orthopedic trauma surgeons evaluated the soft tissue condition in the ER by 5P\'s of the compartment syndrome, judging the timing of the operation of definitive ORIF. Group 1 (n = 16) received delayed ORIF. Group 2 (n = 16) received immediate ORIF and ciNPT use. Patient follow-up occurred after 2 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The assessments included the time to definitive fixation, the length of hospital stay, the time to bone union, surgical site complications, and reoperation within 12 months. A universal goniometer was used to measure the postoperative 3 m, 6 m, and 12 m ROM.
    RESULTS: The patient demographics were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Group 2 displayed significantly a shorter time to definitive fixation (5.94 ± 2.02 vs. 0.61 ± 0.28, p < 0.0001) and hospital stay (14.90 ± 8/78 vs. 10.30 ± 6.78, p = 0.0016). No significant difference was observed in the time to bone union, surgical site complication incidence, and reoperation rates (p > 0.05). Flexion and flexion-extension knee ROM were demonstrated to be significantly improved in Group 2, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, early ORIF and ciNPT use resulted in a shorter hospital length of stay, a reduced time to early active motion of the knee, and improved knee ROM. These results suggest that early ORIF with ciNPT for Schatzker type IV-VI TPFs is safe and effective in some patients. However, further research to confirm these findings across larger and more diverse populations is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    在确定的髓钉(MN)之前使用临时钢板固定(TPF)或外固定(前固定)暂时稳定高能量胫骨骨折是骨科损伤控制中常见的策略。这些方法之间缺乏评估结果的综合数据。这项研究比较了使用TPF或ex-fix稳定的患者的结果,只有早期确定的MN,评估并发症,包括骨不连和深部感染。
    对2014年至2022年在单个一级创伤中心接受MN治疗直至骨折愈合(≥3个月)的成人胫骨骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。评估不愈合和深部感染的医疗记录。人口统计,损伤特征,并记录固定方法。使用Pearson精确检验,将接受TPF和ex-fix的患者与匹配的早期MN队列进行比较,独立t检验,和单向方差分析,取决于适当的变量。
    81例患者被纳入其中;27例患者被TPF(n=12)或ex-fix(n=15)临时处理。54例早期MN病例定义了匹配的队列。所有组均具有相似的患者和骨折特征。两组之间的不愈合率差异显著,使用TPF,前修复,和早期MN组分别为17%,40%和11%(p=0.027)。早期MN的不愈合率较低(11%与40%,p=0.017)和深部感染(13%vs.40%,p=0.028)与前修正相比。
    临时修复后分期MN与较高的骨不连和深部感染率相关。TPF和早期确定的MN之间的并发症发生率没有差异。这些数据表明,在可能的情况下,应避免胫骨骨折的MN固定后再进行MN固定,以支持早期确定的MN。如果需要时间化,TPF可能是比ex-fix更好的选择。证据等级:IV。
    UNASSIGNED: Provisional stabilization of high-energy tibia fractures using temporary plate fixation (TPF) or external fixation (ex-fix) prior to definitive medullary nailing (MN) is a strategy common in damage control orthopaedics. There is a lack of comprehensive data evaluating outcomes between these methods. This study compares outcomes of patients stabilized with either TPF or ex-fix, and with early definitive MN only, assessing complications including nonunion and deep infection.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review was performed on adult patients with tibia fractures treated with MN followed until fracture union (≥3 months) at a single level-1 trauma center from 2014 to 2022. Medical records were evaluated for nonunion and deep infection. Demographics, injury characteristics, and fixation methods were recorded. Significance between patients who underwent TPF and ex-fix was compared with a matched cohort of early MN using Pearson\'s exact tests, independent t-tests, and one-way ANOVA, depending on the appropriate variable.
    UNASSIGNED: 81 patients were included; 27 were temporized with TPF (n = 12) or ex-fix (n = 15). 54 early MN cases defined the matched cohort. All groups had similar patient and fracture characteristics. The difference in rates of nonunion between groups was significant, with TPF, ex-fix, and early MN groups at 17, 40, and 11% respectively (p = 0.027). Early MN had lower rates of nonunion (11% vs. 40%, p = 0.017) and deep infection (13% vs. 40%, p = 0.028) compared to ex-fix.
    UNASSIGNED: Temporary ex-fix followed by staged MN was associated with higher rates of nonunion and deep infection. There was no difference in complication rates between TPF and early definitive MN. These data suggest that ex-fix followed by MN of tibia fractures should be avoided in favor of early definitive MN when possible. If temporization is needed, TPF may be a better option than ex-fix. Level of Evidence: IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在临床实践中,Ilizarov骨运输技术被广泛认为是治疗大段骨缺损的有效方法。然而,轴偏移是胫骨大段骨缺损治疗中常见的并发症,会严重影响骨转运的临床疗效。我们的研究旨在构建和验证用于预测胫骨骨运输轴向偏差的列线图。
    方法:本研究回顾性收集了363例接受胫骨Ilizarov技术骨运输的患者的数据。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析以确定轴向偏离的独立危险因素。后来被用来构造列线图。使用决策曲线分析(DCA)评估列线图,校正曲线,和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。
    结果:在363例接受Ilizarov胫骨骨运输的患者中,31.7%(115/363)出现轴向偏差。多因素logistic回归分析显示,性别,高度,缺陷部位,外固定架指数是轴位偏离的重要危险因素。列线图模型的AUC值为0.705。校准曲线和决策曲线分析显示实际轴向偏差与预测概率之间具有良好的一致性。
    结论:模型为每个变量分配定量风险评分,可用于预测胫骨骨运输过程中轴向偏离的风险。
    BACKGROUND: The Ilizarov bone transport technique is widely recognised as an effective method for treating large segment bone defects in clinical practice. However, axial deviation is a common complication in the treatment of tibial large segment bone defects, which can have a serious impact on the clinical efficacy of bone transport. Our study aims to construct and validate a nomogram for predicting axial deviation of tibial bone transport.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively collected data from 363 patients who underwent the tibial Ilizarov technique for bone transport. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors for axial deviation, which were later used to construct a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated using the decision curve analysis (DCA), the calibration curve, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
    RESULTS: Of the 363 patients who underwent Ilizarov tibial bone transport, 31.7% (115/363) experienced axial deviation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, height, defect site, and external fixation index were important risk factors for axial deviation. The AUC value of the nomogram model was 0.705. The calibration curve and the decision curve analysis showed a good consistency between the actual axial deviation and the predicted probability.
    CONCLUSIONS: The model assigns a quantitative risk score to each variable, which can be used to predict the risk of axial deviation during tibial bone transport.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在临床研究中,尚未评估涂有成纤维细胞生长因子(FGF)-磷酸钙(CP)复合层的钛(Ti)针中骨-针界面强度受损的风险。这项回顾性研究使用Weibull图分析来评估涂有FGF-CP层的Ti针中用于桡骨远端骨折外固定的骨-针界面强度。方法:采用外固定支架治疗桡骨远端骨折。FGF-CP组包括5名患者(所有女性,年龄70.4±5.9(范围:62-77岁),无涂层针组包括10名患者(8名女性和2名男性,年龄64.4±11.7(范围:43-83)岁)。在六周后移除销。测量插入和提取峰值扭矩。使用Weibull图分析评估提取峰值扭矩。结果:我们使用Weibull图分析比较了两组在506Nmm以下的提取扭矩,以进行比较。对于FGF-CP和未涂覆的pin组,Weibull图都是线性的。FGF-CP组(1.7343)的回归线斜率明显高于未涂覆针组(1.5670)(p=0.011)。FGF-CP组(-9.847)的回归线的截距显著低于未涂覆针组(-8.708)(p=0.002)。因此,两条回归线明显不同。结论:涂有FGF-CP层的Ti针在桡骨远端骨折的外固定中具有降低骨-针界面强度受损的风险的潜力。
    Background: The risk of impaired bone-pin interface strength in titanium (Ti) pins coated with fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-calcium phosphate (CP) composite layers is yet to be evaluated in a clinical study. This retrospective study used Weibull plot analysis to evaluate bone-pin interface strength in Ti pins coated with FGF-CP layers for external distal radius fracture fixation. Methods: The distal radial fractures were treated with external fixation. The FGF-CP group comprised five patients (all women, aged 70.4 ± 5.9 (range: 62-77) years), and the uncoated pin group comprised ten patients (eight women and two men, aged 64.4 ± 11.7 (range: 43-83) years). The pins were removed after six weeks. The insertion and extraction peak torques were measured. The extraction peak torque was evaluated using Weibull plot analysis. Results: We compared the extraction torque of the two groups at or below 506 Nmm for a fair comparison using Weibull plot analysis. The Weibull plots were linear for both the FGF-CP and uncoated pin groups. The slope of the regression line was significantly higher in the FGF-CP group (1.7343) than in the uncoated pin group (1.5670) (p = 0.011). The intercept of the regression line was significantly lower in the FGF-CP group (-9.847) than in the uncoated pin group (-8.708) (p = 0.002). Thus, the two regression lines significantly differed. Conclusions: Ti pins coated with FGF-CP layers exhibit the potential to reduce the risk of impaired bone-pin interface strength in the external fixation of distal radius fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定不稳定骨盆骨折的前路内固定与髋臼上外固定是否与护理需求或出院相关。
    方法:在两个三级创伤转诊中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。包括2020年10月至2022年11月由两名骨科创伤外科医师对骨盆前后环进行手术固定的不稳定骨盆骨折(AO/OTA61B/61C)的成年人。主要结果是出院目的地。次要结局包括重症监护病房(ICU)或呼吸机天数,逗留时间,和医院费用。
    结果:83名符合条件的患者为38.6%的女性,平均年龄为47.2±20.3岁,BMI为28.1±6.4kg/m2。59例(71.1%)接受前路骨盆内固定,24例(28.9%)接受外固定。外固定与负重限制相关(91.7%对49.2%,p=0.01)。人口没有差异,功能状态,保险类型,断裂分类,或通过治疗观察损伤严重程度。骨盆前路内固定与外固定与出院无关(49.2%对29.2%,p=0.10),ICU天数中位数(3.0[四分位数间距(IQR)7.8对5.5[IQR4.3],p=0.14,呼吸机天数(0[IQR6.0]对0[IQR2.8],p=0.51),住院时间(13.0[IQR13.0]对17.5(IQR20.5),p=0.38),或医院总费用(180,311美元[IQR219,061.75]对243,622美元[IQR187,111],p=0.14)。
    结论:不稳定骨盆骨折的前路内固定与髋臼上外固定与出院目的地无显著相关,重症监护,住院时间,或医院费用。该样本可能不足以检测组之间的差异。
    方法:治疗级别IV。
    OBJECTIVE: Determine if anterior internal versus supra-acetabular external fixation of unstable pelvic fractures is associated with care needs or discharge.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at two tertiary trauma referral centers. Adults with unstable pelvis fractures (AO/OTA 61B/61C) who received operative fixation of the anterior and posterior pelvic ring by two orthopedic trauma surgeons from October 2020 to November 2022 were included. The primary outcome was discharge destination. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) or ventilator days, length of stay, and hospital charges.
    RESULTS: Eighty-three eligible patients were 38.6% female, with a mean age of 47.2 ± 20.3 years and BMI 28.1 ± 6.4 kg/m2. Fifty-nine patients (71.1%) received anterior pelvis internal fixation and 24 (28.9%) received external fixation. External fixation was associated with weight-bearing restrictions (91.7% versus 49.2%, p = 0.01). No differences in demographic, functional status, insurance type, fracture classification, or injury severity measures were observed by treatment. Internal versus external anterior pelvic fixation was not associated with discharge to home (49.2% versus 29.2%, p = 0.10), median ICU days (3.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.8 versus 5.5 [IQR 4.3], p = 0.14, ventilator days (0 [IQR 6.0] versus 0 [IQR 2.8], p = 0.51), length of stay (13.0 [IQR 13.0] versus 17.5 (IQR 20.5), p = 0.38), or total hospital charges (US dollars 180,311 [IQR 219,061.75] versus 243,622 [IQR 187,111], p = 0.14).
    CONCLUSIONS: Anterior internal versus supra-acetabular external fixation of unstable pelvis fractures was not significantly associated with discharge destination, critical care, hospital length of stay, or hospital charges. This sample may be underpowered to detect differences between groups.
    METHODS: Therapeutic Level IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外部固定装置通常用于骨科手术中,以管理一系列病理。在这个患者群体中,目前对最佳康复技术尚无共识。在实践中存在很大的差异,对这些如何影响治疗结果的理解有限。
    遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,对联合和补充医学数据库(AMED)进行了系统评价,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINAHL),MEDLINE,PEDro,和COCHRANE数据库,灰色文献来源和对收录文章的前后搜索。在严格筛选和预定的纳入标准后选择研究。使用经过验证的评估工具评估数据质量。按康复类型合成文章,随后进行描述性分析。
    从确定的1,156篇文章中,18人符合入选条件。整体质量较低,临床评论和案例研究是最常见的研究类型。研究是按康复类型综合的,最常见的主题是步态再教育,加强,治疗辅助,积极练习和负重练习。
    缺乏高质量的证据来支持有意义的建议并指导该患者队列的康复实践。对接受外固定治疗的患者的进一步研究,特别是身体康复对骨骼愈合的潜在影响,力量的回归,移动性和独立功能在更广泛的骨科人群中可能具有转移性。
    由于现有文献的质量较差,该系统综述无法提供临床建议。然而,希望本文能为进一步研究外固定架治疗患者的康复提供基础。
    PawsonJR,教堂D,弗莱彻J,etal.成人外固定治疗下肢重建的康复技术:系统评价。创伤肢体重建策略2024;19(1):45-55。
    UNASSIGNED: External fixation devices are commonly used in orthopaedic surgery to manage a range of pathologies. In this patient population, there is currently no consensus on optimal rehabilitation techniques. There exists a large variation in practice, with a limited understanding of how these affect treatment outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted of Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, PEDro, and COCHRANE databases, grey literature sources and forward and backward searching of included articles. Studies were selected following rigorous screening with predefined inclusion criteria. Data quality was assessed using validated appraisal tools. Articles were synthesised by rehabilitation type and descriptive analysis was subsequently performed.
    UNASSIGNED: From 1,156 articles identified, 18 were eligible for inclusion. The overall quality was low, with clinical commentaries and case studies being the most common study type. Studies were synthesised by rehabilitation type, the most common themes being gait re-education, strengthening, therapy-assisted, active exercises and weight-bearing exercises.
    UNASSIGNED: There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support meaningful recommendations and guide rehabilitation practices for this patient cohort. Further research for patients being treated in external fixation, especially related to the potential effects of physical rehabilitation on bone healing, return of strength, mobility and independent function is likely to have transferability within wider orthopaedic populations.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review is unable to provide clinical recommendations due to the poor quality of the available literature. However, it is hoped this paper will provide a foundation for further research to improve rehabilitation for patients being treated with external fixation.
    UNASSIGNED: Pawson JR, Church D, Fletcher J, et al. Rehabilitation Techniques for Adults Undergoing External Fixation Treatment for Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):45-55.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    稳定患者的创伤性不稳定骨盆的诊断是一个暂时的概念,取决于我们何时看到患者,因为所有出现失血性休克的患者都有血流动力学稳定,直到他们变得不稳定。作为一项规则,骨盆骨折越不稳定,出血和血流动力学不稳定的风险越高。因此,在不稳定的骨盆骨折中,应排除血流动力学稳定性的诊断.对于稳定患者的出血检测,立即进行一阶段对比增强CT扫描是适当的诊断测试;然而,因为CT扫描辐射一直是个问题,对于血流动力学稳定的患者,应考虑X射线检查,这些患者有合理的怀疑没有发生不安全的出血。骨盆骨折分类是必不可少的,因为通常损伤机制之间存在关联,断裂位移,和血液动力学稳定性。前后和,特别是,垂直创伤更容易引起骨盆大移位和出血。使用骨盆粘合剂,尽早包括院前管理,在高冲击钝性创伤患者中应该是标准的,而与创伤机制无关。在开放性骨折的情况下,外固定是首选的稳定方法。and,在封闭的,当由于患者的一般状况,确定的接骨术时间表延长时。如果可能,立即经皮骶髂螺钉插入不稳定的骨盆骨折产生良好的效果,即使在开放性骨折。
    The diagnosis of a traumatic unstable pelvis in a stable patient is a temporary concept depending on when we see the patient, as all patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock have hemodynamic stability until they become unstable. As a rule, the more unstable the pelvic fracture is, the higher the risk of bleeding and hemodynamic instability it has. Therefore, in unstable pelvic fractures, hemodynamic stability should be a diagnosis by exclusion. For bleeding detection in stable patients, an immediate one-stage contrast-enhanced CT scan is the appropriate diagnosis test; however, since CT scan radiation is always an issue, X-rays should be considered in those cases of hemodynamically stable patients in whom there is a reasonable suspicion that no unsafe bleeding is going on. Pelvic fracture classification is essential as usually there is an association between the injury mechanism, the fracture displacement, and the hemodynamic stability. Anteroposterior and, particularly, vertical traumatisms have much more proclivity to provoke major pelvic displacement and bleeding. The use of a pelvic binder, as early as possible including pre-hospital management, should be standard in high-impact blunt trauma patients independently of the trauma mechanisms. External fixation is the preferred method of stabilization in case of open fractures, and, in closed ones, when the schedule for definite osteosynthesis prolongs because of the patient\'s general condition. If possible, immediate percutaneous sacroiliac screw insertion for unstable pelvic fractures produce excellent results even in open fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号