external fixation

外固定
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:儿童患者股骨干长度不稳定型骨折(LUFSF)的治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨超声引导下闭合复位结合外固定架治疗儿童LUFSF的临床疗效。
    方法:我们对2018年1月至2023年1月期间接受超声引导下闭合复位和外固定的19例LUFSF儿科患者的临床数据进行了回顾性分析。超声不仅用于促进骨折的闭合复位,而且还用于引导Schanz引脚的实时插入并监测引脚穿过相对皮质的长度。手术时间,术中透视计数,住院时间,骨折固定持续时间,并发症发生率,记录最终随访时的骨折复位质量.
    结果:患者的平均年龄为7.5岁(范围:5至11岁)。平均手术时间为70.4分钟(范围:48-105分钟),术中透视平均计数为6.5(范围:2-16)。骨折固定术7~20周,平均10.9周。所有患者均随访一年以上。6例发生浅表针道感染,通过口服抗生素和加强针道护理解决。未观察到深部感染。在2例患者中观察到膝关节暂时僵硬。根据Flynn的疗效评估系统,最终随访时骨折复位质量优良11例,满意8例,综合成功率为100%(19/19)。
    结论:超声引导下闭合复位结合外固定的技术为5至11岁的LUFSF儿童提供了良好的结果,减少对透视引导的依赖。
    OBJECTIVE: The management of length-unstable femoral shaft fractures(LUFSFs) in pediatric patients is still controversial. This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided closed reduction combined with external fixation for treating LUFSFs in children.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 19 pediatric patients with LUFSFs who underwent ultrasound-guided closed reduction and external fixation between January 2018 and January 2023. Ultrasound was employed not only to facilitate closed reduction of the fracture but also to guide real-time insertion of Schanz pins and monitor pin length as it traversed the opposite cortex. Surgical time, intraoperative fluoroscopy count, hospital stay length, fracture fixation duration, complication incidence, fracture reduction quality at the final follow-up were recorded.
    RESULTS: The patients\' average age was 7.5 years( range: 5 to 11 years). The mean surgical duration was 70.4 min (range: 48-105 min), and the average intraoperative fluoroscopy count was 6.5 (range: 2-16). Fracture fixation lasted an average of 10.9 weeks (range: 7-20 weeks). All patients were followed up for more than one year. 6 cases of superficial pin tract infection occurred, which resolved with oral antibiotics and enhanced needle tract care. No deep infections were observed. Temporary stiffness of the knee joint was observed in 2 patients. According to Flynn\'s efficacy evaluation system, fracture reduction quality at the final follow-up was rated as excellent in 11 cases and satisfactory in 8 cases, yielding a combined success rate of 100% (19/19).
    CONCLUSIONS: The technique of ultrasound-guided closed reduction combined with external fixation offers favorable outcomes for children aged 5 to 11 years with LUFSFs, reducing reliance on fluoroscopic guidance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对于严重的下颌骨骨折,快速成型和组装现代外固定器仍然是一个挑战,尤其是在紧急情况下。我们设计了一种新型的外固定器,该固定器结合了万向节,可为下颌骨粉碎性骨折提供稳定。本研究旨在通过体外生物力学测试和动物实验证实这种新型外固定器的功效。
    方法:使用6只具有下颌骨缺损的新鲜犬进行体外生物力学测试,以模拟严重的粉碎性骨折。用新型外固定器稳定三个下颌骨,用2.5mm重建板固定其他下颌骨。所有固定的下颌骨在牙齿的前部区域承受350N的载荷,在未受影响的一侧的第一磨牙承受550N的载荷。根据最大位移和载荷-位移曲线的斜率评估稳定性。在动物实验中,将9只患有下颌骨粉碎性骨折的比格犬分为3组,用新型外固定架治疗,重建板,和牙弓棒,分别。一般的观察,动物体重的变化,记录并比较3组的手术时间。以0天的不同间隔(手术后立即)进行CT扫描,3天,7天,14天,21天,和28天分析犬下颌骨特征点的位移和28天骨折愈合情况。通过方差分析和Bonferroni检验的双向分析来评估统计学意义。使用GraphPadPrism10.1.0(GraphPadInc,美国)。
    结果:生物力学测试结果表明,外固定组和内固定组之间在两种载荷模式下的最大位移(p=0.496,0.079)和载荷位移曲线斜率(p=0.374,0.349)方面没有统计学上的显着差异。动物实验数据显示,外固定组和内固定组之间的特征点存在微小位移,无统计学差异。而足弓杆组的稳定性较差。CT分析显示内固定组骨折愈合最好,然后在固定后28天进行外固定和牙弓裸露。外固定组固定时间(25.67±3.79)min短于内固定(70.67±4.51)min,p<0.001)和足弓裸露((42.00±3.00)min,p=0.046)。
    结论:本研究的结论强调了这种新型外固定器快速治疗下颌骨骨折的有效性和可靠性,在紧急救援的背景下,为下颌骨粉碎性骨折的初步稳定提供了一个可行的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Shaping and assembling contemporary external fixators rapidly for the severe mandibular fractures remains a challenge, especially in emergency circumstance. We designed a novel external fixator that incorporates universal joints to provide the stabilization for mandibular comminuted fractures. This study aims to confirm the efficacy of this novel external fixator through biomechanical tests in vitro and animal experiments.
    METHODS: In vitro biomechanical tests were conducted using 6 fresh canine with mandibular defect to simulate critical comminuted fractures. Three mandibles were stabilized by the novel external fixator and other mandibles were fixed by 2.5 mm reconstruction plates. All fixed mandibles were subjected to loads of 350 N on the anterior regions of teeth and 550 N on the first molar of the unaffected side. The stability was evaluated based on the maximum displacement and the slope of the load-displacement curve. In animal experiments, 9 beagles with comminuted mandibular fractures were divided into 3 groups, which were treated with novel external fixation, reconstruction plate, and dental arch bar, respectively. The general observation, the changes in animals\' weight, and the surgical duration were recorded and compared among 3 groups. The CT scans were performed at various intervals of 0 day (immediately after the surgery), 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days to analyze the displacement of feature points on the canine mandible and situation of fracture healing at 28 days. The statistical significance was assessed by the two-way analysis of variance test followed by the Bonferroni test, enabling multiple comparisons for all tests using GraphPad Prism10.1.0 (GraphPad Inc, USA).
    RESULTS: The outcomes of the biomechanical tests indicated that no statistically significant differences were found in terms of the maximum displacement (p = 0.496, 0.079) and the slope of load displacement curves (p = 0.374, 0.349) under 2 load modes between the external and internal fixation groups. The animal experiment data showed that there were minor displacements of feature points between the external and internal fixation groups without statistic difference, while the arch bar group demonstrated inferior stability. The CT analysis revealed that the best fracture healing happened in the internal fixation group, followed by the external fixation and arch baring at 28 days after fixation. The external fixation group had the shortest fixation duration (25.67 ± 3.79) min compared to internal fixation ((70.67 ± 4.51) min, p < 0.001) and arch baring ((42.00 ± 3.00) min, p = 0.046).
    CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion of this study highlighted the efficacy and reliability of this novel external fixator in managing mandibular fractures rapidly, offering a viable option for the initial stabilization of comminuted mandibular fractures in the setting of emergency rescue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在介绍使用双外固定器(无桥接骨固定钉框架和常规腕部桥接外固定器)经皮治疗AO类型C1,C2和C3型桡骨远端骨折的潜在替代方法。
    方法:2018年1月至2021年1月,采用双外固定器治疗52例桡骨远端骨折患者。为了比较,61例患者(61例桡骨远端骨折)用钢板和螺钉系统治疗。使用Mayo手腕评分评估手腕功能。使用患者满意度短期评估来评估患者满意度。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    结果:所有患者均实现骨折愈合。在29个月的最终随访中(范围,24-34个月)vs36个月(范围,26-39个月)(P>0.05),双外固定器和钢板螺钉系统治疗的患者平均尺骨偏差为31°vs29°(P<0.05),平均Mayo腕部评分为91.12±5.98vs88.12±7.54(P<0.05),患者满意度平均得分为23.42±2.47和23.04±2.32(P>0.05)。
    结论:AO型C1、C2和C3型桡骨远端骨折可以使用双外固定器成功治疗。该技术是除了常规治疗之外的潜在替代方案。
    方法:IIa级。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to introduce a potential alternative percutaneous treatment for AO types C1, C2, and C3 distal radius fractures using dual-external fixator (a no-bridging cemented-pin frame and a conventional wrist-bridging external fixator).
    METHODS: From January 2018 to January 2021, 52 patients (52 distal radius fractures) were treated with dual-external fixator. For comparison, 61 patients (61 distal radius fractures) were treated with a plate and screw system. Wrist function was assessed using the Mayo Wrist Score. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: Fracture healing was achieved in all patients. At the final follow-up of 29 months (range, 24-34 months) vs 36 months (range, 26-39 months) (P > 0.05), the patients treated with dual-external fixator and a plate and screw system achieved mean ulnar deviations of 31° vs 29° (P < 0.05), mean Mayo Wrist Scores of 91.12 ± 5.98 vs 88.12 ± 7.54 (P < 0.05), and mean patient satisfaction scores of 23.42 ± 2.47 vs 23.04 ± 2.32 (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: AO types C1, C2, and C3 distal radius fractures can be treated successfully using dual-external fixator. The technique is a potential alternative in addition to the conventional treatments.
    METHODS: Level IIa.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在临床实践中,Ilizarov骨运输技术被广泛认为是治疗大段骨缺损的有效方法。然而,轴偏移是胫骨大段骨缺损治疗中常见的并发症,会严重影响骨转运的临床疗效。我们的研究旨在构建和验证用于预测胫骨骨运输轴向偏差的列线图。
    方法:本研究回顾性收集了363例接受胫骨Ilizarov技术骨运输的患者的数据。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析以确定轴向偏离的独立危险因素。后来被用来构造列线图。使用决策曲线分析(DCA)评估列线图,校正曲线,和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。
    结果:在363例接受Ilizarov胫骨骨运输的患者中,31.7%(115/363)出现轴向偏差。多因素logistic回归分析显示,性别,高度,缺陷部位,外固定架指数是轴位偏离的重要危险因素。列线图模型的AUC值为0.705。校准曲线和决策曲线分析显示实际轴向偏差与预测概率之间具有良好的一致性。
    结论:模型为每个变量分配定量风险评分,可用于预测胫骨骨运输过程中轴向偏离的风险。
    BACKGROUND: The Ilizarov bone transport technique is widely recognised as an effective method for treating large segment bone defects in clinical practice. However, axial deviation is a common complication in the treatment of tibial large segment bone defects, which can have a serious impact on the clinical efficacy of bone transport. Our study aims to construct and validate a nomogram for predicting axial deviation of tibial bone transport.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively collected data from 363 patients who underwent the tibial Ilizarov technique for bone transport. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors for axial deviation, which were later used to construct a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated using the decision curve analysis (DCA), the calibration curve, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
    RESULTS: Of the 363 patients who underwent Ilizarov tibial bone transport, 31.7% (115/363) experienced axial deviation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, height, defect site, and external fixation index were important risk factors for axial deviation. The AUC value of the nomogram model was 0.705. The calibration curve and the decision curve analysis showed a good consistency between the actual axial deviation and the predicted probability.
    CONCLUSIONS: The model assigns a quantitative risk score to each variable, which can be used to predict the risk of axial deviation during tibial bone transport.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:多平面外固定架已用于治疗胫骨节段性骨折伴严重软组织损伤。然而,专门研究的报道较少。这项研究的主要目的是描述我们使用TaylorSpatialFrame和Ilizarov外固定方法治疗此类骨折的经验。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2020年12月在我院接受治疗的33例胫骨节段骨折患者。根据外固定结构将患者分为双泰勒空间框架(D-TSF)和Ilizarov组。基线人口统计数据包括性别,年龄,受伤的一面和原因,开放性或闭合性骨折,从受伤到手术的时间,并发症,以及外框架移除和骨折愈合时间。术前测量髋-膝-踝角度(HKA),术后即刻,最后随访双侧下肢全长X线。我们通过计算测得的角度与理想值180°之间的差异来确定HKA的偏差程度;绝对值用于评估下肢力线的恢复。在最后的后续行动中,Johner-Wruhs胫骨骨折结局标准(J-WTFOC)用于将患肢的术后功能分类为极好,不错,中度,或者穷。采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验对计数数据进行分析,秩数据采用Mann-WhitneyU检验。
    结果:两组在性别方面无统计学差异,年龄,受伤的一面,受伤原因,闭合性或开放性骨折,或者受伤和手术之间的时间,这表明各组具有可比性(p>0.05)。D-TSF组和Ilizarov组的外框架切除和骨折愈合时间差异有统计学意义(36.24±8.34vs45.42±10.21周,p=0.009;33.33±8.21vs42.00±9.78周,p=0.011)。Johner-Wruhs标准用于评估患肢的功能,D-TSF组在矫正下肢力线方面的表现优于Ilizarov组。两组之间在优秀评分方面观察到统计学上的显着差异(18/2/1/0vs5/5/1/1,p=0.010)。术后随访X射线显示,与手术前的角度相比,两组在手术后立即和最终随访时的HKA均有显着改善。在最后的后续行动中,两组之间的HGA偏差程度有统计学意义(1.58°±0.84°vs2.37°±1.00°,p=0.023)。
    结论:D-TSF治疗对软组织的继发性损伤最小,一个简单而微创的程序,多平面稳定骨折固定术,以及优化骨折线和下肢力线,因此,是治疗胫骨节段骨折的有效选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Multi-planar external fixation has been used for the management of segmental tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injuries. However, fewer specialized studies have been reported. The primary aim of this study was to describe our experience of treating fractures of this type using the Taylor Spatial Frame and Ilizarov external fixation methods.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 33 patients with segmental tibial fracture treated at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. The patients were divided into double Taylor Spatial Frame (D-TSF) and Ilizarov groups based on the external fixation structure. Baseline demographic data included sex, age, injury side and cause, open or closed fracture, time from injury to surgery, complications, and external frame removal and fracture healing time. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured from preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up full-length X-rays of bilateral lower limbs. We determined the degree of deviation in the HKA by calculating the difference between the measured angle and the ideal value of 180°; the absolute value was used to assess recovery of the lower limb force line. At the final follow-up, Johner-Wruhs tibial fracture outcome criteria (J-W TFOC) were used to classify the postoperative function of the affected limb as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. Count data were analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher\'s exact test; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for rank data.
    RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex, age, side of injury, cause of injury, closed or open fracture, or time between injury and surgery, which indicates that the groups were comparable (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed in external frame removal and fracture healing time between the D-TSF and Ilizarov groups (36.24 ± 8.34 vs 45.42 ± 10.21 weeks, p = 0.009; 33.33 ± 8.21 vs 42.00 ± 9.78 weeks, p = 0.011). The Johner-Wruhs criteria were used to assess the function of the affected limb, the D-TSF group performed better in correcting the lower limb force line than the Ilizarov group. A statistically significant difference in terms of excellent ratings was observed between the two groups (18/2/1/0 vs 5/5/1/1, p = 0.010). Postoperative follow-up X-rays demonstrated a significant improvement in the HKA in both groups immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up compared to the angle before surgery. At the final follow-up, a statistically significant difference was observed in the degree of deviation in the HKA between the two groups (1.58° ± 0.84° vs 2.37° ± 1.00°, p = 0.023).
    CONCLUSIONS: The D-TSF treatment is associated with minimal secondary damage to soft tissue, a straightforward and minimally invasive procedure, multiplanar stable fracture fixation, and optimization of fracture alignment and lower limb force lines, therefore, it is highly effective therapeutic option for segmental tibial fracture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内固定和外固定是治疗骨折的常见外科手术。然而,不同手术入路(包括内外固定)对患者心理状态和生活质量(QoL)的影响很少被研究.在这里,我们的目的是调查内外固定对焦虑的影响,抑郁症,失眠,桡骨远端骨折(DRF)患者的总体心理和身体健康。
    方法:我们对96例接受内固定(57例)或外固定(39例)的骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。视觉模拟刻度(VAS),医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS),雅典失眠量表(AIS),和医学结果研究简短表格36(SF-36)问卷用于评估患者的疼痛,焦虑,抑郁症,睡眠,手术前和七天的生活质量,一个月,手术后三个月.
    结果:术后第7天和1个月,内固定组(IFG)的VAS评分明显低于外固定组(EFG)(P<0.05)。尽管两组都没有表现出明显的焦虑,抑郁症,术前失眠(P>0.05),EFG显示出明显较高的HADS-A,HADS-D,术后7天、1个月和3个月AIS评分高于IFG(P<0.05)。此外,HADS-A的变化,HADS-D,EFG术后第7天AIS评分最显著(P<0.05)。此外,术前两组患者的平均身体成分汇总(PCS)和心理成分汇总(MCS)评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,两组患者在术后第7天、术后1个月和3个月时的PCS和MCS评分均呈阳性变化,与EFG相比,IFG具有显著更高的平均PCS和MCS得分(P<0.05)。
    结论:与外固定架相比,内固定术后早期对患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪没有显著影响,术后康复期身心健康恢复较好。此外,当没有绝对的迹象时,对患者心理健康的影响应作为手术方式选择治疗方案的关键因素之一。
    BACKGROUND: Internal and external fixation are common surgical procedures for treating fractures. However, the impact of different surgical approaches (including internal and external fixations) on patients\' psychological status and Quality of Life (QoL) is rarely examined. Herein, we aimed to investigate the effects of internal and external fixation on anxiety, depression, insomnia, and overall mental and physical health in Distal Radius Fractures (DRF) patients.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 96 fracture patients who underwent internal fixation (57 patients) or external fixation (39 patients). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire were used to assess the patients\' pain, anxiety, depression, sleep, and QoL before surgery and at seven days, one month, and three months post-surgery.
    RESULTS: The VAS scores were significantly lower in the Internal Fixation Group (IFG) than in the External Fixation Group (EFG) on the seventh day and one month postoperatively (P < 0.05). Although both groups showed no significant anxiety, depression, or insomnia before surgery (P > 0.05), the EFG showed significantly higher HADS-A, HADS-D, and AIS scores than the IFG at seven days and one and three months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Additionally, changes in HADS-A, HADS-D, and AIS scores were most significant at day seven post-surgery in the EFG (P < 0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the average Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores before surgery (P > 0.05). However, both groups showed positive changes in PCS and MCS scores at postoperative day seven and one and three months postoperatively, with the IFG having significantly higher average PCS and MCS scores compared to the EFG (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to external fixation, internal fixation did not significantly impact patients\' emotions regarding anxiety and depression in the early postoperative period, and physical and mental health recovery was better during the postoperative rehabilitation period. Furthermore, when there are no absolute indications, the impact on patients\' psychological well-being should be considered as one of the key factors in the treatment plan during surgical approach selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Pilon骨折代表了胫骨骨折的一个具有挑战性的子集。由于相关的并发症以及缺乏明确的手术时机和方法指南,AO/OTAC3型骨折的治疗仍然很复杂。进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以评估AO/OTAC3型胫骨Pilon骨折的两种阶段治疗策略。这项研究的重点是评估手术难度,并发症,和患者预后。一组患者接受早期腓骨和胫骨后柱内固定联合外固定,而另一组在第一阶段仅接受外固定。接受早期腓骨和胫骨后柱内固定联合外固定的患者效果较好,包括较低的同种异体骨移植率(67.74%对94.64%),减少伤口延迟和皮肤坏死的发生率(3.23%对21.43%),手术时间较短(133.06±23.99minvs163.04±26.83min),住院时间较短(13.77±2.53天对18.25±3.67天),和更高的AOFAS(83.05±8.68对79.36±8.92)。此外,研究表明,避免腓骨缩短对于防止长时间手术和改善患者功能至关重要.研究表明,早期内固定的分期治疗方法可缩短手术时间,改善踝关节功能,减少并发症,包括较低的感染风险。研究结果支持使用这种治疗方法来优化AO/OTAC3型Pilon骨折的结果。
    Pilon fractures represent a challenging subset of tibial fractures. The management of AO/OTA Type C3 fractures remains complex due to associated complications and lack of clear guidelines for surgical timing and methods. A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate two staged treatment strategies for AO/OTA Type C3 tibial pilon fractures. The study focused on assessing surgical difficulty, complications, and patient prognosis. One group of patients received early internal fixation of the fibula and tibial posterior column combined with external fixation, while the other group received external fixation alone in the first stage. Patients who received early internal fixation of the fibula and tibial posterior column combined with external fixation had better outcomes, including lower rate of allogeneic bone grafting (67.74 % versus 94.64 %), reduced incidence of wound delay and skin necrosis (3.23 % versus 21.43 %), shorter surgical time (133.06 ± 23.99 min versus 163.04 ± 26.83 min), shorter hospital stay (13.77 ± 2.53 days versus 18.25 ± 3.67 days), and higher AOFAS (83.05 ± 8.68 versus 79.36 ± 8.92). Additionally, avoiding fibular shortening was shown to be crucial in preventing prolonged surgery and improving patient function. The study demonstrated that the staged treatment approach with early internal fixation led to shorter operative times, improved ankle function, and reduced complications, including a lower risk of infection. The findings support the use of this treatment to optimize outcomes in AO/OTA Type C3 pilon fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:石膏在耐水性方面的缺点,透气性,皮肤舒适,固定的稳定性和穿着的重量仍然有待解决。3D打印铸件可以克服上述缺点。目前,关于3D打印铸件的临床应用数据相对缺乏,可能是由于它的复杂性,相对较长的运行时间,和高价格。我们旨在比较和评估短期有效性,3D打印腕管与聚合物矫形器治疗Colles骨折的安全性和优势。
    方法:选取2022年6月至12月我院收治的Colles骨折患者40例,分为观察组(20例,使用即时3D打印铸件治疗)和对照组(20例,用聚合物矫形器治疗)。两组均采用手法复位外固定治疗。视觉模拟量表(VAS)固定效果和满意度得分,手臂的残疾,肩和手(DASH)得分,收集并比较固定前和骨折后2,6和12周的并发症和影像学资料.
    结果:骨折后2周观察组VAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组骨折后6周的固定效果和满意度评分均显著高于对照组(均P<0.05)。观察组骨折后2、6周的DASH评分均显著低于对照组(均P<0.05)。两组均未出现印模或矫形器破裂。对照组有2例皮肤刺激,观察组未出现皮肤刺激。观察组骨折后2周和12周的掌侧倾角和尺侧倾角均显著高于对照组(均P<0.05)。
    结论:即时3D打印铸模和聚合物矫形器均可有效治疗Colles骨折。但即时3D打印铸件在良好的临床和成像性能方面优于聚合物矫形器,和高患者满意度和舒适度。
    BACKGROUND: The shortcomings of plaster in water resistance, air permeability, skin comfort, fixed stability and weight of wearing are still to be solved. 3D printed cast can overcome the above shortcomings. At present, there is a relative lack of data on the clinical application of 3D printed cast, probably due to its complexity, relatively long operating time, and high price. We aimed to compare and evaluate the short-term effectiveness, safety and advantages of 3D printed wrist cast versus polymer orthosis in the treatment of Colles fracture.
    METHODS: Forty patients with Colles fracture in our hospital from June to December 2022 were selected and divided into an observation group (20 patients, treated with instant 3D printed cast) and a control group (20 cases, treated with polymer orthosis). Both groups treated with manual reduction and external fixation. The visual analogue scale (VAS), immobilization effectiveness and satisfaction scores, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, complications and imaging data were collected and compared before immobilization and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the fracture.
    RESULTS: VAS at 2 weeks after the fracture was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group ( P < 0.05). The immobilization effectiveness and satisfaction scores at 6 weeks after the fracture were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). The DASH scores at 2 and 6 weeks after the fracture were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). There wasn\'t rupture of the printed cast or orthosis in both groups. There were 2 cases of skin irritation in the control group, and no skin irritation occurred in the observation group. The palmar tilt angle and ulnar inclination angle at 2 weeks and 12 weeks after the fracture were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both instant 3D printed cast and polymer orthosis are effective in the treatment of Colles fracture. But instant 3D printed cast is better than polymer orthosis in areas of good clinical and imaging performance, and high patient satisfaction and comfort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:观察病灶清除术的临床疗效。骨移植,聚变,外固定支架治疗晚期腕关节结核。
    方法:2015年10月至2019年5月,对25例晚期腕关节结核患者进行病灶切除治疗,骨移植,聚变,和外固定。在这些患者中,有14名男性和11名女性,年龄从40岁到74岁,平均年龄(60.72±8.45)岁。病程5~24个月,平均(11.52±7.61)个月。其中左侧腕关节结核11例,右侧腕关节结核14例,5例伴有窦道形成。术后继续常规抗结核治疗。视觉模拟评分(VAS),炎症指标,Gartland-Werley腕关节功能评分,观察治疗前后上肢功能评分。
    结果:25例患者均获随访,随访时间12~36个月,平均(19.7±6.3)个月。在最新的后续行动中,所有伤口都令人满意地愈合,无结核或感染复发。术前1周和术后3个月VAS评分分别为(5.16±1.14)分和(1.68±0.80)分。手术前一周和手术后三个月,血沉(ESR)分别为(44.20±20.56)mm·h-1和(14.44±1.14)mm·h-1,C反应蛋白(CRP)分别为(12.37±7.95)mg·L-1和(4.3±3.37)mg·L-1。三组数据间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。根据Gartland-Werley腕关节功能评分,术前一周和术后一年的得分分别为(21.32±3.44)和(14.96±1.37)。差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。根据上肢功能评分(手臂残疾,肩膀,手,DASH),术前1周评分为(70.52±7.95),术后1年评分为(28.84±2.30)。差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。在最新的后续行动中,没有患者出现结核复发.
    结论:病灶清除治疗腕关节结核的近期临床疗效,骨移植,聚变,外固定是令人满意的。
    OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy of lesion removal, bone grafting, fusion, and external fixation in the treatment of late-stage wrist tuberculosis.
    METHODS: From October 2015 to May 2019, 25 patients with late-stage wrist tuberculosis were treated using lesion removal, bone grafting, fusion, and external fixation. Among these patients, there were 14 males and 11 females, aged from 40 to 74 years old, with an average age of (60.72±8.45) years old. The duration of the disease ranged from 5 to 24 months, with an average of (11.52±7.61) months. There were 11 cases of left wrist tuberculosis and 14 cases of right wrist tuberculosis, with 5 cases accompanied by sinus formation. Postoperative regular anti-tuberculosis treatment was continued. Visual analogue score (VAS), inflammatory indicators, Gartland-Werley wrist function score, and upper limb function score were observed before and after treatment.
    RESULTS: All 25 patients were followed up for ranging from 12 to 36 months with an average of (19.7±6.3) months. At the latest follow-up, all wounds were healed satisfactorily, and there was no recurrence of tuberculosis or infection. VAS at one week before operation and three months after operation were (5.16±1.14) score and (1.68±0.80) score respectively. One week before operation and three months after operation, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was (44.20±20.56) mm·h-1 and (14.44±1.14) mm·h-1, and C-reactive protein (CRP) was (12.37±7.95) mg·L-1 and (4.3±3.37) mg·L-1. The differences in all three data sets were statistically significant (P<0.01). According to Gartland-Werley wrist function scoring, the scores at one week before operation and one year after operation were (21.32±3.44) and (14.96±1.37) respectively, showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.01). According to the upper limb function score (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, DASH), the score was (70.52±7.95) at one week before operation and(28.84±2.30) at one year after operation. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). At the latest follow-up, no patient had a recurrence of tuberculosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The short-term clinical efficacy of treating wrist tuberculosis with lesion removal, bone grafting, fusion, and external fixation is satisfactory.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    伴有肋骨骨折的创伤性胸部切口的临床处理提出了巨大的挑战。进行该研究以比较听诊三角内固定(ATIF)和外固定(EF)在此类损伤中的结果。从2019年6月至2022年6月,105例多发性肋骨骨折患者参加了队列研究,将他们分为两组:53例患者接受了ATIF,52例患者接受了EF。手术部位感染的发生率,伤口愈合时间,伤口裂开的发生率,换药次数,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的疼痛,住院时间,恢复工作的时期,通过手臂残疾评估的上肢肺部并发症和功能,肩膀,和手(DASH)问卷是评估的参数之一。与EF相比,ATIF显示伤口裂开的发生率降低(1.9%vs.9.6%)(p<0.05),手术部位感染(3.8vs.11.5)和伤口愈合时间(12.3±2.1vs.18.5±3.7天)(p<0.05)。此外,在ATIF治疗期间,患者需要更少的换药(3.5±0.8vs.5.7±1.2),并证明了增强的疼痛管理,缩短住院时间,加快重返工作岗位(p<0.05)。ATIF组表现出上肢功能和术后肺功能的增强(p<0.05)。与EF相比,ATIF用于治疗伴有肋骨骨折的创伤性胸部伤口在伤口愈合方面产生了优异的结果。减少感染并恢复肺和上肢功能。
    The clinical management of traumatic chest incisions accompanied by rib fractures presents the formidable challenge. The study was carried out to compare the outcomes of auscultatory triangle internal fixation (ATIF) and external fixation (EF) in such injuries. From June 2019 to June 2022, 105 patients with multiple rib fractures participated in the cohort study in which they were divided into two groups: 53 patients underwent ATIF and 52 patients underwent EF. The incidence of surgical site infection, wound healing time, incidence of wound dehiscence, number of dressing changes, pain as measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), duration of hospitalization, period of return to work, pulmonary complications and functionality of the upper limbs as assessed by the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were among the parameters evaluated. In comparison with EF, ATIF demonstrated the decreased incidence of wound dehiscence (1.9% vs. 9.6%) (p < 0.05), surgical site infection (3.8 vs. 11.5) and wound healing time (12.3 ± 2.1 vs. 18.5 ± 3.7 days) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, during their ATIF treatment, patients required fewer changes of dressing (3.5 ± 0.8 vs. 5.7 ± 1.2) and demonstrated enhanced pain management, reduced hospital stays and expedited return to work (p < 0.05). ATIF group demonstrated enhancements in both upper limb functionality and post-operative pulmonary function (p < 0.05). The utilization of ATIF as opposed to EF for the treatment of traumatic chest wounds accompanied by rib fractures yields superior outcomes in terms of wound healing, infection reduction and restoration of pulmonary and upper limb functionality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号