dyspnoea

呼吸困难
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,癌症患者的生存率显着提高。然而,这也导致了副作用的增加,如呼吸困难,这会对患者产生负面影响。我们提出了一项再教育工作方案。主要目的是测试该计划在改善癌症患者呼吸道症状和功能方面的有效性。
    方法:实验,prospective,纵向,采用并行固定分配方案(CG-IG)的随机研究。患者从萨拉曼卡大学医院综合医院(CAUSA)的肿瘤内科服务中选择,西班牙。为两个研究组设计了两个平行的干预计划(常规临床实践-努力再教育计划)。主要变量:呼吸困难(MRC),功能(Barthel);次要变量:身体表现(SPPB)和功能能力(ECOG)以及社会人口统计学变量(年龄,性别,解剖病理学诊断,和治疗线的数量)。
    结果:研究样本包括182名患者,排除12个,最终样本量为n=170。性别分布(CG:男性52.9%,女性47.1%;IG:男性49.4%,女性50.6%)。主要的肿瘤诊断是肺癌,最常见的肿瘤分期是III期和IV期。在IG和CG评分之间(p<0.001,d=0.887,95%CI)以及IG和CG评分之间(p=0.004,d=0.358,95%CI)之间存在统计学上的显着差异,这表明IG的表现更好。
    结论:这项研究的结果支持运动再教育计划的有益效果,由跨学科团队开展,以提高肿瘤患者呼吸困难的自主性。
    背景:该临床试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04186754)中注册。(2019年9月3日)。
    BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the survival rates of cancer patients. However, this has also led to an increase in side effects, such as dyspnoea, which can negatively impact of patients. We propose a programme for re-educating effort. The main objective is to test the effectiveness of this programme in improving respiratory symptoms and functionality in cancer patients.
    METHODS: Experimental, prospective, longitudinal, randomised study with a parallel fixed-assignment scheme (CG-IG). The patients were selected from the Medical Oncology Service of the University Hospital Complex of Salamanca (CAUSA), Spain. Two parallel intervention programmes were designed for the two study groups (Conventional Clinical Practice-Effort Re-education Programme). Primary variables: dyspnoea (MRC), functionality (Barthel); secondary variables: physical performance (SPPB) and functional capacity (ECOG) and the socio-demographic variables (age, sex, anatomopathological diagnosis, and number of treatment lines).
    RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 182 patients, with 12 excluded, resulting in a final sample size of n = 170. Sex distribution (CG: 52.9% male and 47.1% female; IG: 49.4% male and 50.6% female). The primary oncological diagnosis was lung cancer, and the most frequent tumour stages were III and IV. Statistically significant differences were found between the IG and CG scores (p < 0.001, d = 0.887, 95% CI) and between the IG and CG scores (p = 0.004, d = 0.358, 95% CI), indicating that the IG performed better.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the beneficial effects of an exercise re-education programme, carried out by an interdisciplinary team in improving the autonomy of oncology patients with dyspnoea.
    BACKGROUND: The clinical trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04186754). (03 September 2019).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:布洛芬是儿童最常用的镇痛和解热药物之一。然而,其在儿童哮喘发病机制中的潜在因果作用仍不确定.在这次系统审查中,我们评估了儿童服用布洛芬与哮喘发生或加重风险之间的相关性.
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,科克伦图书馆,CINAHL,WebofScience,和Scopus从成立到2022年5月,没有语言限制;搜索相关评论;并进行引文搜索。我们纳入了任何设计的研究,这些设计是主要的经验性同行评审出版物,据报道,0-18岁儿童使用布洛芬。通过盲法审查一式两份进行筛选。总的来说,24项研究符合我们的标准。数据是根据PRISMA指南提取的,使用RoB2和NOS工具评估偏倚风险。使用固定效应模型汇集定量数据,定性数据使用叙事综合进行汇总。主要结果是哮喘或哮喘样症状。结果按人群分组(一般,哮喘,和布洛芬过敏),比较器类型(活跃和非活跃)和随访持续时间(短期和长期)。
    结果:将布洛芬与主动比较剂进行比较,在普通人群或哮喘人群中,没有证据表明布洛芬的短期和长期风险较高.在短期随访中比较布洛芬的使用与无活性替代方案,布洛芬用于缓解发热或毛细支气管炎的症状时,可对普通人群的哮喘样症状提供保护。相比之下,对于已有哮喘的患者,它可能导致哮喘恶化.然而,在这两个人群中,没有明确的长期随访效果.
    结论:在儿童中使用布洛芬相对于主动比较者没有升高的风险。然而,用于哮喘儿童可能导致哮喘加重。结果是由极少数有影响力的研究推动的,在几个关键临床背景下的研究仅限于单一研究。需要临床试验和观察性研究来了解布洛芬在儿童哮喘发病机制中的潜在作用。
    BACKGROUND: Ibuprofen is one of the most commonly used analgesic and antipyretic drugs in children. However, its potential causal role in childhood asthma pathogenesis remains uncertain. In this systematic review, we assessed the association between ibuprofen administration in children and the risk of developing or exacerbating asthma.
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to May 2022, with no language limits; searched relevant reviews; and performed citation searching. We included studies of any design that were primary empirical peer-reviewed publications, where ibuprofen use in children 0-18 years was reported. Screening was performed in duplicate by blinded review. In total, 24 studies met our criteria. Data were extracted according to PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using RoB2 and NOS tools. Quantitative data were pooled using fixed effect models, and qualitative data were pooled using narrative synthesis. Primary outcomes were asthma or asthma-like symptoms. The results were grouped according to population (general, asthmatic, and ibuprofen-hypersensitive), comparator type (active and non-active) and follow-up duration (short- and long-term).
    RESULTS: Comparing ibuprofen with active comparators, there was no evidence of a higher risk associated with ibuprofen over both the short and long term in either the general or asthmatic population. Comparing ibuprofen use with no active alternative over a short-term follow-up, ibuprofen may provide protection against asthma-like symptoms in the general population when used to ease symptoms of fever or bronchiolitis. In contrast, it may cause asthma exacerbation for those with pre-existing asthma. However, in both populations, there were no clear long-term follow-up effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen use in children had no elevated risk relative to active comparators. However, use in children with asthma may lead to asthma exacerbation. The results are driven by a very small number of influential studies, and research in several key clinical contexts is limited to single studies. Both clinical trials and observational studies are needed to understand the potential role of ibuprofen in childhood asthma pathogenesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    气胸会导致呼吸困难,然而,胸膜腔中积聚的空气的影响及其与膈肌功能和呼吸困难症状的关系尚不清楚。Bendopnoea是一种不断发展的临床症状,已被证明在某些心脏和肺部疾病中具有临床作用。气胸患者是否存在弯曲性噪声,其潜在的临床用途尚未得到研究。PASE研究是一项初步研究,旨在探索气胸患者中bendopnoea的发生率和临床相关性,并可能提供对气胸相关呼吸困难的更好理解。
    PASE是一项前瞻性研究。在基线(空气引流前/肺再充气)和一旦肺重新扩张气胸消退的患者(保守管理或空气引流程序后)进行评估。结果措施包括苯丙胺的发生率,相关症状(疼痛和呼吸困难)与弯曲呼吸的严重程度和气胸的大小的相关性;以及与临床结果的相关性(即对空气引流/肺部再充气的反应)。该研究将招募50名参与者。
    这是首次探索气胸患者的神经麻痹的研究。与气胸患者的临床和生理参数相关的苯并不存在和意义需要研究。这项研究的结果可能进一步了解呼吸困难相关的气胸。
    注册管理机构名称:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册管理机构试验登记号:ACTRN12623001109695p。此试验的试验注册表记录的URL:https://anzctr.org。au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386631&isReview=真实注册日期:2023年10月24日注册。试验资助:本研究尚未获得资助支持。这项研究由呼吸健康研究所赞助,非营利组织。试验发起人的姓名和联系信息:毕林先生;财务经理。凡尔登街6号2楼,内德兰兹,西澳6009.赞助者的角色:资助者不参与研究的计划,聚集,分析,解释数据,或者准备手稿。协议版本:1.
    UNASSIGNED: Pneumothorax can cause distressing breathlessness, however the effect of the accumulated air in the pleural space and its association with diaphragmatic function and symptoms of breathlessness is not well understood. Bendopnoea is an evolving clinical symptom that has been demonstrated as clinically useful in some heart and lung conditions. Whether bendopnoea is present in patients with pneumothorax, and its potential clinical usefulness has not yet been investigated. The PASE study is a pilot study to explore the incidence and clinical relevance of bendopnoea in patients with pneumothorax and may provide better understanding of pneumothorax related dyspnoea.
    UNASSIGNED: PASE is a prospective study. Eligible patients are assessed at baseline (pre air drainage/lung reinflation) and in patients whose pneumothorax resolves once the lung has re-expanded (post conservative management or air drainage procedure). Outcome measures include the incidence of bendopnoea, correlation of the associated symptoms (pain and breathlessness) to the severity of bendopnoea and the size of pneumothorax; and correlation with clinical outcome (i.e., response to air drainage/lung reinflation). The study will recruit 50 participants.
    UNASSIGNED: This is the first study to explore bendopnoea in patients with pneumothorax. The presence and significance of bendopnoea in relation to clinical and physiological parameters in patients with pneumothorax requires investigation. The findings of this study may further current understanding of dyspnoea related pneumothorax.
    UNASSIGNED: Name of the registry: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Trial registration number : ACTRN12623001109695p. URL of the trial registry record for this trial : https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386631&isReview=true Date of registration : Registered on 24 October 2023. Funding of the trial : This study has not received grant support. The study is sponsored by the Institute for Respiratory Health, a not-for-profit organisation. Name and contact information for the trial sponsor : Mr Bi Lam; Finance manager. Level 2, 6 Verdun Street, Nedlands, WA 6009. Role of sponsor : The funder is not involved in the planning of the study, gathering, analysing, and interpreting the data, or in preparing the manuscript. Protocol version : 1.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管证据很少,对适应症的指导有限,使用,和剂量,咪达唑仑广泛用于姑息治疗。我们旨在描述和比较咪达唑仑在三个不同国家的使用,以改善姑息治疗的临床实践。我们在挪威的姑息治疗医生中进行了一项在线调查,丹麦,和英国(英国)。重点是适应症,给药,administration,和伴随的药物。向各自的国家姑息医学协会成员分发了基于网络的问卷。总有效率为9.4%。英国的实践,挪威,和丹麦在咪达唑仑焦虑的适应症方面总体相似,呼吸困难,与阿片类药物联合治疗疼痛。然而,英国的医生使用了更高的起始剂量来治疗焦虑,呼吸困难,和疼痛治疗相比,挪威和丹麦,以及更高的最大剂量。丹麦医生首选,在更高的程度上,咪达唑仑按需给药。尽管英国的做法相似,挪威,丹麦,在姑息治疗中,咪达唑仑的给药和给药存在差异。我们对如何将咪达唑仑用于姑息治疗缺乏共识,为该主题的未来研究奠定基础。
    Despite sparse evidence and limited guidance on indications, use, and dosing, midazolam is widely used in palliative care. We aimed to describe and compare the use of midazolam in three different countries to improve clinical practice in palliative care. We performed an online survey among palliative care physicians in Norway, Denmark, and the United Kingdom (UK). The focus was indications, dosing, administration, and concomitant drugs. A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the respective national palliative medicine associations. The total response rate was 9.4%. Practices in the UK, Norway, and Denmark were overall similar regarding the indications of midazolam for anxiety, dyspnoea, and pain treatment in combination with opioids. However, physicians in the UK used a higher starting dose for anxiety, dyspnoea, and pain treatment compared to Norway and Denmark, as well as a higher maximum dose. Danish physicians preferred, to a higher degree, on-demand midazolam administration. Despite practice similarities in the UK, Norway, and Denmark, differences exist for midazolam dosing and administration in palliative medicine. We demonstrated a lack of consensus on how midazolam should be used in palliative care, setting the stage for future studies on the topic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重患者气管插管和机械通气与多种并发症相关。因此,使用无创正压通气(NIPPV)是建议对这些患者的初始管理.本研究旨在评估和比较应用NIPPV前后的临床和生理参数,并评估NIPPV的结果。
    方法:对50例COPD急性加重患者进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。这些患者用NIPPV治疗。测量血压,呼吸频率(RR),心率(HR),使用改良的Borg量表呼吸困难,和动脉血气(ABG)参数(pH,PaCO2和PaO2)记录在基线,一小时,六个小时,24小时,每天直到出院。研究结果包括成功接受NIPPV和在NIPPV期间失败的受试者。
    结果:NIPPV有效地将呼吸困难评分从基线时的7.24±1.58降低到1小时时的5.53±1.82,6小时时4.11±1.75,24小时时2.60±1.03,出院时1.26±0.44。在HR和RR方面也观察到显著改善(P<0.001)。与基线相比时,pH水平显著维持,PaCO2降低,PaO2在不同时间增加。在四名患者中观察到死亡率。
    结论:NIPPV在42(84%)患者中成功,随着ABG和pH值的改善,早期恢复和减少住院时间。
    BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in individuals experiencing acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with several complications. Therefore, utilizing noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is the suggested initial management for these individuals. The current study was done to assess and compare the clinical and physiological parameters before and after the application of NIPPV and also to evaluate the outcomes of NIPPV.
    METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on 50 patients with COPD experiencing acute exacerbations. These patients were treated with NIPPV. Measurements of blood pressure, respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), dyspnea using the modified Borg scale, and arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters (pH, PaCO2, and PaO2) were recorded at baseline, one hour, six hours, 24 hours, and daily until discharge. The study\'s outcomes included the subjects who successfully underwent NIPPV and failed during NIPPV.
    RESULTS: NIPPV effectively reduced the dyspnea score from 7.24 ± 1.58 at baseline to 5.53 ± 1.82 at one hour, 4.11 ± 1.75 at six hours, 2.60 ± 1.03 at 24 hours, and 1.26 ± 0.44 at the time of discharge. Significant improvements were also observed in HR and RR (P < 0.001). When compared to the baseline, the pH level was significantly maintained, PaCO2 was decreased, and PaO2 was increased at various times. Mortality was observed in four patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: NIPPV was successful in 42 (84%) patients, with improvements in ABG and pH for early recovery and reduced hospital stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重症监护病房(ICU)的成年人通常会出现令人痛苦的症状和其他问题,例如疼痛,谵妄,和呼吸困难。无呼吸管理不受任何ICU指南的支持,与其他症状不同。
    目的:回顾与(i)患病率有关的文献,强度,评估,ICU中接受有创和无创机械通气(NIV)和高流量氧气疗法的危重成人的呼吸困难和管理,(HFOT),(ii)呼吸困难对ICU患者参与康复的影响。
    方法:使用Cochrane方法组建议进行了快速回顾和叙述综合,并根据PRISMA进行了报告。所有研究设计均调查接受有创机械通气(IMV)的成年ICU患者的呼吸困难,NIV或HFOT符合资格。PubMed,MEDLINE,从2013年6月至2023年6月,搜索了Cochrane图书馆和CINAHL数据库。研究进行了质量评估。
    结果:纳入了代表2822名ICU患者的19项研究(参与者平均年龄48岁至71岁;男性比例为43-100%)。接受IMV的ICU患者呼吸困难的加权平均患病率为49%(范围34-66%)。开始前接受NIV自我报告中度至重度呼吸困难的患者比例为55%。呼吸困难评估工具包括视觉模拟量表,(VAS),数字评级量表,(NRS)和修改后的BORG量表,(mBORG)。在接受NIV的患者中,报告的中位数(四分位距[IQR])VAS最高,NRS和mBORG评分为6.2cm(0-10cm),分别为5(2-7)和6(2.3-7)(中度至重度呼吸困难)。在接受NIV或HFOT的患者中,报告的中位数(IQR)VAS最高,NRS和mBORG评分为3厘米(0-6厘米),8(5-10)和4(3-5)。
    结论:接受IMV的成年人呼吸困难,ICU中的NIV或HFOT很普遍,并且具有临床重要性,中位强度等级表明存在中度至重度症状。
    BACKGROUND: Adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) commonly experience distressing symptoms and other concerns such as pain, delirium, and breathlessness. Breathlessness management is not supported by any ICU guidelines, unlike other symptoms.
    OBJECTIVE: To review the literature relating to (i) prevalence, intensity, assessment, and management of breathlessness in critically ill adults in the ICU receiving invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) and high-flow oxygen therapy, (HFOT), (ii) the impact of breathlessness on ICU patients with regard to engagement with rehabilitation.
    METHODS: A rapid review and narrative synthesis using the Cochrane Methods Group Recommendations was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA. All study designs investigating breathlessness in adult ICU patients receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), NIV or HFOT were eligible. PubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL databased were searched from June 2013 to June 2023. Studies were quality appraised.
    RESULTS: 19 studies representing 2822 ICU patients were included (participants mean age 48 years to 71 years; proportion of males 43-100%). The weighted mean prevalence of breathlessness in ICU patients receiving IMV was 49% (range 34-66%). The proportion of patients receiving NIV self-reporting moderate to severe dyspnoea was 55% prior to initiation. Breathlessness assessment tools included visual analogue scale, (VAS), numerical rating scale, (NRS) and modified BORG scale, (mBORG). In patients receiving NIV the highest reported median (interquartile range [IQR]) VAS, NRS and mBORG scores were 6.2cm (0-10 cm), 5 (2-7) and 6 (2.3-7) respectively (moderate to severe breathlessness). In patients receiving either NIV or HFOT the highest reported median (IQR) VAS, NRS and mBORG scores were 3 cm (0-6 cm), 8 (5-10) and 4 (3-5) respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Breathlessness in adults receiving IMV, NIV or HFOT in the ICU is prevalent and clinically important with median intensity ratings indicating the presence of moderate to severe symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肺淋巴管炎癌是一种罕见且严重的转移性疾病表现,可引起肺部症状和放射学模式类似于间质性肺病。
    我们报告了一例78岁的妇女,她到我们部门就诊,隐匿地出现了疲劳症状,干咳,严重呼吸困难3个月。胸部X线检查显示双侧间质改变。怀疑间质性肺病,进行支气管镜检查和经支气管镜冷冻活检。令人惊讶的是,组织病理学检查显示肺淋巴管炎癌起源于原发性乳腺癌。
    为了实现准确的诊断并防止开始适当治疗的延迟,必须采用彻底的诊断方法。如有疑问,应进行活检以确保澄清。在此病例报告中,我们讨论了为此目的的经支气管冷冻活检的诊断价值。
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary lymphangitis carcinomatosa is a rare and severe manifestation of metastatic disease that causes pulmonary symptoms and radiologic patterns similar to interstitial lung diseases.
    UNASSIGNED: We report a case of a 78-year-old woman who presented to our department with insidiously developed symptoms of fatigue, dry cough, and severe dyspnea for 3 months. Chest radiography showed bilateral interstitial changes. On suspicion of interstitial lung disease, bronchoscopy and transbronchial cryobiopsy were carried out. Surprisingly, histopathological investigation revealed pulmonary lymphangitis carcinomatosa originating from primary breast adenocarcinoma.
    UNASSIGNED: To achieve an accurate diagnosis and prevent delay of initiation of proper treatment a thorough diagnostic approach is necessary. In case of doubt, biopsy should be performed to secure clarification. In this case report we discuss the diagnostic value of transbroncial cryobiopsy for this purpose.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    胸腔积液常导致呼吸困难,然而,机制是未知的。胸腔积液患者在“试验和错误”的基础上进行胸腔积液引流,症状缓解各不相同。该人群通常抱怨bendopnoea(向前弯曲时呼吸困难),尚未进行调查。我们的试点数据发现,苯丙胺与胸腔积液的存在显着相关。PLEASE-3研究将评估bendopnoea作为积液相关呼吸困难的筛查测试,其对液体引流的症状获益的预测价值,并探讨其潜在的生理机制。
    PLEASE-3是一项多中心前瞻性研究。符合条件的患者在基线(引流前)和接受引流的患者进行评估,术后长达72小时。结果措施包括苯丙胺的患病率,其与积液大小的相关性及其对引流后呼吸困难缓解的预测价值。弯曲呼吸与呼吸困难的关系,生理参数,功能容量和膈肌特征将被评估。该研究将招募200名参与者。
    这是首次研究胸腔积液患者的神经麻痹。它具有最低限度的排除标准,以确保结果是可概括的。在胸腔积液的情况下,bendopnoea的存在和临床意义需要进行彻底的研究。对接受胸腔积液引流的患者进行评估后,将深入了解是否存在bendopnoea能够预测临床结果。
    注册管理机构名称:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册管理机构试验登记号:ACTRN12622000465752。此试验的试验注册表记录的URL:https://www。anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=383639&isReview=真实注册日期:2022年3月24日注册。试验经费:本研究已获得查尔斯·盖尔德纳爵士研究咨询委员会研究项目资助。这项研究由呼吸健康研究所赞助,非营利组织。试验发起人的姓名和联系信息:毕林先生;财务经理。凡尔登街6号2楼,内德兰兹西澳6009。t’+61861510877e’bi。lam@resphealth。uwa.edu.赞助者的角色:资助者不参与研究的规划,聚集,分析,解释数据,或者准备手稿。
    UNASSIGNED: Pleural effusions often cause disabling breathlessness, however the mechanism is unknown. Patients with pleural effusions are subjected to pleural fluid drainage on a \'trial and error\' basis, as symptom relief varies. This population commonly complain of bendopnoea (breathlessness on bending forward) which has not been investigated. Our pilot data found bendopnoea was significantly associated with presence of pleural effusion. The PLEASE-3 study will evaluate bendopnoea as a screening test for effusion-related breathlessness, its predictive value of symptomatic benefits from fluid drainage and explore its underlying physiological mechanism.
    UNASSIGNED: PLEASE-3 is a multi-centre prospective study. Eligible patients are assessed at baseline (pre-drainage) and for patients undergoing drainage, up to 72 h post-procedure. Outcome measures include the prevalence of bendopnoea, its correlation with size of effusion and its predictive value of breathlessness relief after drainage. The relationship of bendopnoea with breathlessness, physiological parameters, functional capacity and diaphragmatic characteristics will be assessed. The study will recruit 200 participants.
    UNASSIGNED: This is the first study to investigate bendopnoea in patients with pleural effusion. It has minimal exclusion criteria to ensure that the results are generalisable. The presence and clinical significance of bendopnoea in the context of pleural effusion requires thorough investigation. The post assessment of patients undergoing pleural fluid drainage will provide insight into whether the presence of bendopnoea is able to predict clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Name of the registry: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Trial registration number: ACTRN12622000465752. URL of the trial registry record for this trial: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=383639&isReview=true Date of registration: Registered on 24 March 2022. Funding of the trial: This study has received funding from the Sir Charles Gairdner Research Advisory Council research project grant. The study is sponsored by the Institute for Respiratory Health, a not-for-profit organisation. Name and contact information for the trial sponsor: Mr Bi Lam; Finance manager. Level 2, 6 Verdun Street, Nedlands WA 6009. t‖ + 61 8 6151 0877 e‖ bi.lam@resphealth.uwa.edu.au Role of sponsor : The funder is not involved in the planning of the study, gathering, analysing, and interpreting the data, or in preparing the manuscript.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在慢性肾脏病(CKD)中,由于肾功能异常,在隔膜中观察到病理变化。已建议对CKD患者进行吸气肌肉训练(IMT);然而,尚未确定IMT的最合适强度。因此,本研究旨在探讨不同IMT方案对呼吸肌力的影响,股四头肌肌力(QMS),手握肌肉力量(HGS),功能性运动能力,生活质量(QoL),肺功能,呼吸困难,疲劳,balance,CKD患者的体力活动(PA)水平。
    方法:这是随机的,控制,单盲研究包括47例患者,他们分为三组:第1组(n=15,IMT,最大吸气压力(MIP)为10%),第2组(n=16,IMT,MIP为30%),和第3组(n=16;具有60%MIP的IMT)。MIP,最大呼气压(MEP),6分钟步行试验(6-MWT),QMS,HGS,QoL,肺功能,呼吸困难,疲劳,balance,在IMT前后8周进行PA水平评估。
    结果:MIP增加,%MIP,6-MWT距离,IMT后第2组和第3组的6-MWT和%显著高于第1组(p<0.05)。MEP,%MEP,FEF25-75%,QMS,HGS,和QoL显著增加;呼吸困难和疲劳在所有组(p<0.05)。FVC,PEF,PA仅在第2组中改善,而平衡在第1组和第2组中改善(p<0.05)。
    结论:具有30%和60%MIP的IMT类似地改善了吸气肌肉力量和功能运动能力。30%的IMT在增加PA方面更有效。IMT是增强外周和呼气肌力量的有益方法,呼吸功能,QoL和平衡,减少呼吸困难和疲劳。对于不耐受较高强度的CKD患者,IMT为%30可能是一种选择。
    背景:这项研究是回顾性注册的(NCT06401135,06/05/2024)。
    BACKGROUND: Pathological changes were observed in the diaphragm due to abnormal renal function in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been suggested for patients with CKD; however, the most appropriate intensity for IMT has not been determined. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of different IMT protocols on respiratory muscle strength, quadriceps femoris muscle strength (QMS), handgrip muscle strength (HGS), functional exercise capacity, quality of life (QoL), pulmonary function, dyspnoea, fatigue, balance, and physical activity (PA) levels in patients with CKD.
    METHODS: This randomized, controlled, single-blind study included 47 patients and they were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 15, IMT with 10% maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)), Group 2 (n = 16, IMT with 30% MIP), and Group 3(n = 16; IMT with 60% MIP). MIP, maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), 6-min walking test (6-MWT), QMS, HGS, QoL, pulmonary function, dyspnoea, fatigue, balance, and PA levels were assessed before and after eight weeks of IMT.
    RESULTS: Increases in MIP, %MIP, 6-MWT distance, and %6-MWT were significantly higher in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 after IMT (p < 0.05). MEP, %MEP, FEF25-75%, QMS, HGS, and QoL significantly increased; dyspnoea and fatigue decreased in all groups (p < 0.05). FVC, PEF, and PA improved only in Group 2, and balance improved in Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: IMT with 30% and 60% MIP similarly improves inspiratory muscle strength and functional exercise capacity. IMT with 30% is more effective in increasing PA. IMT is a beneficial method to enhance peripheral and expiratory muscle strength, respiratory function, QoL and balance, and reduce dyspnoea and fatigue. IMT with %30 could be an option for patients with CKD who do not tolerate higher intensities.
    BACKGROUND: This study was retrospectively registered (NCT06401135, 06/05/2024).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号