drug reactions

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特应性皮炎(AD),牛皮癣,与红皮病相关的药物反应经常因感染而复杂化。然而,血流感染(BSI)受到的研究关注较少。
    本研究旨在探讨红皮病患者与BSI相关的临床特征和危险因素。
    对141例红皮病病例进行回顾性分析。11例患者被确定为患有BSI。回顾并比较了BSI和非BSI组的临床记录。
    在7.80%(11/141)的红皮病病例中诊断出BSI,在AD中分解为7.14%,2.00%的牛皮癣,药物反应占17.14%。值得注意的是,所有阳性皮肤培养物(7/7)均显示细菌分离株与血液培养物一致。单因素logistic回归分析显示与BSI有几个显著关联,包括温度(≤36.0或≥38.5°C;比值比(OR)=28.06;p<0.001),冷却(OR=22.10;p<0.001),肾脏疾病(OR=14.64;p<0.001),药物反应的病因(OR=4.18;p=0.03),白蛋白(ALB)(OR=0.86;p<0.01),C反应蛋白(CRP)(OR=1.01;p=0.02),白细胞介素6(IL-6)(OR=1.02;p=0.02),和降钙素原(PCT)(OR=1.07;p=0.03)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线显示与ALB显著相关(p<0.001;曲线下面积(AUC)=0.80),PCT(p=0.009;AUC=0.74),和CRP(p=0.02;AUC=0.71)。
    提高对BSI风险的认识在红皮病管理中至关重要。有特定危险因素的患者,如体温异常(≤36.0或≥38.5℃),令人不寒而栗的感觉,肾病,有药物反应史,CRP升高(≥32mg/L),PCT升高(≥1.00ng/ml),和低白蛋白(≤31.0g/L),需要密切监测BSI的发展。
    UNASSIGNED: Atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, and drug reactions associated with erythroderma are frequently complicated by infections. However, bloodstream infection (BSI) have received less research attention.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with BSI in patients with erythroderma.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 141 erythroderma cases. Eleven cases were identified as having BSI. Clinical records of both BSI and non-BSI groups were reviewed and compared.
    UNASSIGNED: BSI was diagnosed in 7.80% (11/141) of erythroderma cases, with a breakdown of 7.14% in AD, 2.00% in psoriasis, and 17.14% in drug reactions. Notably, all positive skin cultures (7/7) showed bacterial isolates concordant with blood cultures. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed several significant associations with BSI, including temperature (≤36.0 or ≥38.5 °C; odds ratio (OR) = 28.06; p < 0.001), chilling (OR = 22.10; p < 0.001), kidney disease (OR = 14.64; p < 0.001), etiology of drug reactions (OR = 4.18; p = 0.03), albumin (ALB) (OR = 0.86; p < 0.01), C-reaction protein (CRP) (OR = 1.01; p = 0.02), interleukin 6 (IL-6) (OR = 1.02; p = 0.02), and procalcitonin (PCT) (OR = 1.07; p = 0.03). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated significant associations with ALB (p < 0.001; the area under curve (AUC) = 0.80), PCT (p = 0.009; AUC = 0.74), and CRP (p = 0.02; AUC = 0.71).
    UNASSIGNED: Increased awareness of BSI risk is essential in erythroderma management. Patients with specific risk factors, such as abnormal body temperature (≤36.0 or ≥38.5 °C), chilling sensations, kidney disease, a history of drug reactions, elevated CRP (≥32 mg/L), elevated PCT (≥1.00 ng/ml), and low albumin (≤31.0 g/L), require close monitoring for BSI development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    本报告旨在强调与erdafitinib相关的广泛眼科不良事件,一种阻断丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激酶(MAPK/MEK)级联激活的成纤维细胞生长因子抑制剂。本报告的目的是描述一例在20个月疗程的erdafitinib治疗后,MEK相关视网膜病变谱中与erdafitinib相关的双侧外视网膜改变和快速发作的双侧总白内障。
    一名69岁男性转移性膀胱癌患者在开始每日服用erdafitinib(8mg)治疗后47天出现,左眼出现轻度新的视网膜下液和最小的相关视网膜下碎片,右眼交叉带加重/增厚。在治疗过程中,注意到改进,特别是erdafitinib剂量减少。20个月时,两只眼睛发展迅速进行性成熟的白内障,具有显著的视觉变化,需要双侧白内障摘除术。
    中度外部视网膜变化的潜在稳定性(即,椭圆体区/叉指区,视网膜下液),同时继续erdafitinib治疗在本报告中强调。此外,鉴于眼前节不良事件可能与长期使用erdafitinib相关,因此强调了持续眼科监测的重要性.
    UNASSIGNED: This report aims to highlight the wide spectrum of ophthalmic adverse events associated with erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor inhibitor that blocks activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAPK/MEK) cascade. The purpose of this report is to describe a case of erdafitinib-associated bilateral outer retinal alterations in the MEK-associated retinopathy spectrum and rapid onset bilateral total cataracts following a 20-month course of erdafitinib therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: A 69 year old male with metastatic bladder cancer presented 47 days following treatment initiation with daily erdafitinib (8-mg) with mild new subretinal fluid and minimal associated subretinal debris in the left eye and accentuation/thickening of the interdigitation zone in the right eye. Over the course of treatment, improvements were noted, particularly with erdafitinib dose reduction. At 20 months, both eyes developed rapidly progressive mature cataracts with significant visual changes, necessitating bilateral cataract extraction.
    UNASSIGNED: The potential stability of moderate outer retinal changes (i.e., ellipsoid zone/interdigitation zone, subretinal fluid) while continuing erdafitinib therapy is highlighted in this report. In addition, the importance of continued ophthalmic surveillance is emphasized given the possible association of anterior segment adverse events with long-term erdafitinib use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了改善β-内酰胺去标签结果,我们需要了解当前的实践和有关其结果的证据基础,安全,和影响。
    我们试图评估现有发表的关于青霉素过敏测试和去标签有效性的证据报告。
    我们对报告β-内酰胺脱标签实践和测试后结果的研究进行了系统回顾,包括β-内酰胺的使用和患者对去标签结果的理解。搜索PubMed,Scopus,和Embase数据库;临床试验注册;和专业组织的网站进行了。数据从纳入的研究中提取,一式两份,如果仍然存在差异,则进行第三次提取。
    我们纳入了284篇出版物(涵盖98,316名参与者);173项是前瞻性研究,没有随机对照试验。总体研究质量较低。总之,95.6%接受挑衅测试的人被去标签。由于研究之间的显着异质性,无法确定与成功剥离相关的因素。0.3%的参与者(31,667人中有95人)发生了因测试引起的过敏反应。攻击前未进行皮肤测试的受试者(31项研究中的6,980例患者)的激发试验阳性率(8.8%vs4.1%[P<.0001])和过敏反应(15.9%vs2.7%[P<.0001])高于进行皮肤测试的受试者(177项研究中的51,607例患者)。六项研究(2.1%)在测试后跟踪患者,以评估他们对处方建议的依从性。总之,136名参与者(20.6%)积极避免β-内酰胺,尽管去标签。
    现有数据表明,青霉素过敏测试对大多数人的脱标签是安全有效的,但是证据基础不完整,需要更多的工作来评估皮肤测试的作用以及去标签对处方习惯的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: To improve β-lactam delabeling outcomes, we need to understand current practice and the evidence base regarding its outcomes, safety, and impact.
    UNASSIGNED: We sought to assess the existing published evidence reporting on the effectiveness of penicillin allergy testing and delabeling.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting β-lactam delabeling practices and outcomes after testing, including β-lactam use and patient understanding of the delabeling result. Searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases; clinical trial registries; and websites of professional organizations were conducted. Data were extracted from the included studies in duplicate, with a third extraction if discrepancies remained.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 284 publications (covering 98,316 participants); 173 were prospective studies, with no randomized controlled trials. The overall study quality was low. In all, 95.6% of individuals who underwent provocation testing were delabeled. Factors associated with successful delabeling could not be determined because of significant heterogeneity between studies. Anaphylaxis due to testing occurred in 0.3% of participants (95 of 31,667). Subjects who did not undergo skin testing (6,980 patients in 31 studies) before challenge had higher rates of provocation test positivity (8.8% vs 4.1% [P < .0001]) and anaphylaxis (15.9% vs 2.7% [P < .0001]) than those subjects who underwent skin testing (51,607 patients in 177 studies). Six studies (2.1%) followed patients after testing to assess their adherence to prescribing recommendations. In all, 136 participants (20.6%) were actively avoiding β-lactams despite delabeling.
    UNASSIGNED: The available data suggest that penicillin allergy testing is safe and effective in delabeling most individuals, but the evidence base is incomplete and more work is required to assess the role of skin testing and the impact that delabeling is having on prescribing habits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS)综合征的药物反应是一种严重的,对经常涉及终末器官损伤的罪魁祸首药物的危及生命的反应。皮质类固醇是DRESS综合征的一线治疗方法;然而,某些患者人群可能禁用皮质类固醇。目前文献中报道的仅有54例详述使用环孢素治疗DRESS综合征的病例。
    目的:本系列病例的目的是通过汇总症状缓解时间,在大型患者队列中检查环孢素对DRESS综合征的治疗。复发率,以及治疗剂量和持续时间。
    方法:本研究为回顾性队列研究。包括2015年至2019年由董事会认证的皮肤科医生诊断为DRESS综合征并在科罗拉多大学医院接受治疗的患者。
    结果:19例DRESS综合征符合我们的纳入标准。短期服用环孢菌素,我们队列中的19例患者中有17例(89%)症状缓解(平均治疗时间为5.26天)。使用环孢素治疗后DRESS综合征的复发发生在19例队列中的3例(16%)。
    结论:我们的研究支持使用环孢素治疗DRESS综合征,特别是在无法维持长期免疫抑制的患者中。在更大的研究人群中,需要进一步的研究来比较环孢素与当前治疗标准的疗效,并调查长期结果。
    BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe, life-threatening reaction to a culprit drug that frequently involves end-organ damage. Corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for DRESS syndrome; however, corticosteroids may be contraindicated in certain patient populations. There are currently only 54 cases detailing the use of cyclosporine for the treatment of DRESS syndrome reported in the literature.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case series was to examine the treatment of DRESS syndrome with cyclosporine in a large patient cohort by aggregating time to symptom resolution, recurrence rate, and treatment dose and duration.
    METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with DRESS syndrome by a board-certified dermatologist and treated at the University of Colorado Hospital from 2015 to 2019 were included.
    RESULTS: Our inclusion criterion was met by 19 occurrences of DRESS syndrome. With a short course of cyclosporine, 17 of 19 patients in our cohort (89%) had resolution of symptoms (mean treatment length of 5.26 days). DRESS syndrome\'s relapse after treatment with cyclosporine occurred in 3 of 19 (16%) occurrences of the cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the use of cyclosporine in the treatment of DRESS syndrome, particularly in patients who are unable to sustain prolonged immunosuppression. Further research is necessary to compare the efficacy of cyclosporine to the current standard of care in a larger study population and investigate long-term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:药物性肝损伤(DILI)可由任何处方药引起,并且是新上市药物停药的重要原因。直接作用的口服抗凝剂(DOAC)是最近引入的基于非维生素K的拮抗剂,并且越来越多地用于各种临床病症。对29项随机对照试验和152116例患者进行的荟萃分析报告,DOAC患者的DILI风险没有增加。然而,在这些研究中排除已有肝病患者的个体患者中,预测DILI的危险因素具有挑战性.
    目的:通过近期病例报告和系列的系统评价和荟萃总结,确定DOAC继发DILI患者的危险因素和结局。
    方法:对包括PubMed在内的多个数据库进行了系统搜索,科学直接,参考引文分析,谷歌学者。搜索条件包括\"急性肝衰竭\"或\"急性慢性肝衰竭\"或\"急性化学和药物诱导的肝损伤\"或\"慢性化学和药物诱导的肝损伤\"和\"因子Xa抑制剂\"或\"达比加群\"或\"利伐沙班\"或\"阿哌沙班\"\"结果被过滤为以英语和成人患者发表的文献。仅包括报告DOAC继发DILI病例的病例报告和案例研究。人口统计数据,合并症,用药史,实验室调查,成像,组织学,管理,并提取结果。
    结果:共15项研究(13例病例报告和2例病例系列)纳入分析,包括27例发生DOAC继发DILI的患者。利伐沙班是最常见的DOAC(n=20,74.1%)。DILI的平均发病时间为40.6d。最常见的症状是黄疸(n=15,55.6%),萎靡不振(n=9,33.3%),呕吐(n=9,33.3%)。实验室调查显示肝酶和胆红素水平升高。影像学检查和肝活检显示了急性肝炎和胆汁淤积性损伤的特征。大多数患者都有良好的结果,只有1例(3.7%)因肝功能衰竭死亡。
    结论:DOAC越来越多地用于各种临床病症,DOAC继发的DILI是一种罕见但潜在严重的并发症。及时识别和停止犯罪药物对于DILI的管理至关重要。大多数DOAC继发的DILI患者具有良好的结果,但一小部分可能进展为肝功能衰竭和死亡。进一步研究,包括上市后基于人口的研究,需要更好地了解DOAC继发DILI的发生率和危险因素。
    BACKGROUND: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can be caused by any prescribed drug and is a significant reason for the withdrawal of newly launched drugs. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are non-vitamin K-based antagonists recently introduced and increasingly used for various clinical conditions. A meta-analysis of 29 randomised controlled trials and 152116 patients reported no increased risk of DILI with DOACs. However, it is challenging to predict the risk factors for DILI in individual patients with exclusion of patients with pre-existing liver disease from these studies.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors and outcomes of patients who developed DILI secondary to DOACs by systematic review and meta-summary of recent case reports and series.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on multiple databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Reference Citation Analysis, and Google Scholar. The search terms included \"Acute Liver Failure\" OR \"Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure\" OR \"Acute Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury\" OR \"Chronic Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury\" AND \"Factor Xa Inhibitors\" OR \"Dabigatran\" OR \"Rivaroxaban\" OR \"apixaban\" OR \"betrixaban\" OR \"edoxaban\" OR \"Otamixaban\". The results were filtered for literature published in English and on adult patients. Only case reports and case studies reporting cases of DILI secondary to DOACs were included. Data on demographics, comorbidities, medication history, laboratory investigations, imaging, histology, management, and outcomes were extracted.
    RESULTS: A total of 15 studies (13 case reports and 2 case series) were included in the analysis, comprising 27 patients who developed DILI secondary to DOACs. Rivaroxaban was the most commonly implicated DOAC (n = 20, 74.1%). The mean time to onset of DILI was 40.6 d. The most common symptoms were jaundice (n = 15, 55.6%), malaise (n = 9, 33.3%), and vomiting (n = 9, 33.3%). Laboratory investigations showed elevated liver enzymes and bilirubin levels. Imaging studies and liver biopsies revealed features of acute hepatitis and cholestatic injury. Most patients had a favourable outcome, and only 1 patient (3.7%) died due to liver failure.
    CONCLUSIONS: DOACs are increasingly used for various clinical conditions, and DILI secondary to DOACs is a rare but potentially serious complication. Prompt identification and cessation of the offending drug are crucial for the management of DILI. Most patients with DILI secondary to DOACs have a favourable outcome, but a small proportion may progress to liver failure and death. Further research, including post-marketing population-based studies, is needed to better understand the incidence and risk factors for DILI secondary to DOACs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号