disgust

厌恶
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    厌恶是避免疾病的重要情绪。不同文化的成年人对潜在污染或病原体的来源表现出厌恶,并选择避免摄入它们,甚至看着它们。胃节律似乎起着重要作用:厌恶会降低胃的正常力量,和胃状态的药理学正常化减少厌恶避免。通过自我报告和面部表情来衡量,人类儿童的厌恶情绪非常缓慢。这里,我们调查了5~13岁儿童(N=45)是否存在厌恶诱导的回避(使用眼动追踪测量)和胃节律变化(使用胃电图测量).我们发现,这个括号中的孩子在一个看起来很有优势的任务中表现出避免令人作呕的刺激的眼球运动,与先前研究中的成人样本相似。然而,与先前研究中的成人样本相比,儿童未显示正常胃力减弱。这些发现可能表明,在厌恶期间,回避行为先于胃受累。这将支持孩子最初对父母建模做出反应的想法:父母设定(并执行)厌恶回避的社会规范,孩子们最初顺从,后来才将厌恶内化为一种相互感受的信号。或者,所采用的刺激可能足够有效地诱导眼球运动回避,但不是胃部的反应.这方面的研究很渺茫,未来的工作应该集中在阐明胃在厌恶中的作用上,以及从童年到青春期厌恶发展的纵向研究。
    Disgust is a vital emotion in the avoidance of illness. Human adults across cultures show disgust towards sources of potential contamination or pathogens, and elect to avoid their ingestion or even to look at them. Stomach rhythms appear to play an important role: disgust reduces normogastric power, and the pharmacological normalisation of gastric state reduces disgust avoidance. Human children are remarkably slow to develop disgust as measured by self-report and facial expressions. Here, we investigate whether disgust-induced avoidance (measured using eye tracking) and changes in gastric rhythm (measured using electrogastrography) exist in children aged 5 to 13 years (N = 45). We found that children in this bracket showed oculomotor avoidance of disgusting stimuli in a preferential-looking task, similar to adult samples in previous research. However, in contrast to adult samples in previous research, children did not show an attenuation in normogastric power. These findings could suggest that avoidance behaviour precedes gastric involvement during disgust. This would support the idea that children initially respond to parental modelling: parents set (and enforce) the social norm of disgust avoidance, and children initially conform and only later do they internalise disgust as an interoceptive signal. Alternatively, the employed stimuli could have been potent enough to induce oculomotor avoidance, but not a gastric response. Research is slim in this area, and future work should focus on elucidating the role of the stomach in disgust, and on longitudinal studies of disgust development from childhood to adolescence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了一个不提供信息的,厌恶的不相关情绪反应会干扰不确定性下的决策。我们通过将令人厌恶的图像与不利/不良套牌(一致条件)或有利/良好套牌(不一致条件)的选择相关联来操纵爱荷华州赌博任务(IGT)。还包括没有操作的控制条件。结果表明,随着任务在所有条件下展开,从良好甲板中进行选择的可能性增加。然而,这种效果是通过实验操作来调节的。具体来说,我们检测到有害影响(即,截距显着降低)在不一致条件下产生厌恶的图像(vs.Control),但这种影响仅限于任务的早期阶段(即,前二十次试验)。在一致性和对照条件之间没有检测到性能趋势的差异。预期皮肤传导反应,心率,根据体细胞标记假说,瞳孔扩张也被评估为预期自主神经激活的指标,但在任何条件下,前两个指数都没有显示出影响。当任务在控制和不一致条件下展开时,仅检测到瞳孔扩张的下降趋势。根据“风险即感觉”框架讨论结果,体细胞标记假说,和IGT文学。
    This study investigates whether a not informative, irrelevant emotional reaction of disgust interferes with decision-making under uncertainty. We manipulate the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) by associating a disgust-eliciting image with selections from Disadvantageous/Bad decks (Congruent condition) or Advantageous/Good decks (Incongruent condition). A Control condition without manipulations is also included. Results indicate an increased probability of selecting from a Good deck as the task unfolds in all conditions. However, this effect is modulated by the experimental manipulation. Specifically, we detect a detrimental effect (i.e., a significant decrease in the intercept) of the disgust-eliciting image in Incongruent condition (vs. Control), but this effect is limited to the early stages of the task (i.e., first twenty trials). No differences in performance trends are detected between Congruent and Control conditions. Anticipatory Skin Conductance Response, heart rate, and pupil dilation are also assessed as indexes of anticipatory autonomic activation following the Somatic Marker Hypothesis, but no effects are shown for the first two indexes in any of the conditions. Only a decreasing trend is detected for pupil dilation as the task unfolds in Control and Incongruent conditions. Results are discussed in line with the \"risk as feelings\" framework, the Somatic Marker Hypothesis, and IGT literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    厌恶的情绪保护个体免受病原体的侵害,并且发现它在怀孕期间升高。与这些变化有关的生理机制包括免疫标记和孕酮水平。这项研究旨在评估类固醇与妊娠期厌恶敏感性之间的关系。使用前瞻性纵向设计,我们分析了血清类固醇浓度,并通过基于文本的问卷测量了179名孕妇在孕早期和妊娠晚期的厌恶敏感度.我们发现厌恶敏感性与Δ5途径中C19类固醇(包括睾酮)及其前体水平呈正相关(雄烯二醇,DHEA,和它们的硫酸盐)和Δ4途径(雄烯二酮)。此外,在两个三个月中,与5α/β减少的C19类固醇代谢物呈正相关。在头三个月,厌恶敏感性与17-羟基孕烷醇酮和一些雌激素呈正相关.在妊娠晚期,与皮质醇和免疫保护性Δ5C197α/β-羟基类固醇呈正相关。我们的研究结果表明,厌恶敏感性与免疫调节类固醇呈正相关,在妊娠晚期,可能与潜在的母亲焦虑相关症状有关的类固醇。这项研究强调了怀孕期间荷尔蒙变化与厌恶敏感性之间的复杂关系。
    The emotion of disgust protects individuals against pathogens, and it has been found to be elevated during pregnancy. Physiological mechanisms discussed in relation to these changes include immune markers and progesterone levels. This study aimed to assess the association between steroids and disgust sensitivity in pregnancy. Using a prospective longitudinal design, we analyzed blood serum steroid concentrations and measured disgust sensitivity via text-based questionnaires in a sample of 179 pregnant women during their first and third trimesters. We found positive correlations between disgust sensitivity and the levels of C19 steroids (including testosterone) and its precursors in the Δ5 pathway (androstenediol, DHEA, and their sulfates) and the Δ4 pathway (androstenedione). Additionally, positive correlations were observed with 5α/β-reduced C19 steroid metabolites in both trimesters. In the first trimester, disgust sensitivity was positively associated with 17-hydroxypregnanolone and with some estrogens. In the third trimester, positive associations were observed with cortisol and immunoprotective Δ5 C19 7α/β-hydroxy-steroids. Our findings show that disgust sensitivity is positively correlated with immunomodulatory steroids, and in the third trimester, with steroids which may be related to potential maternal-anxiety-related symptoms. This study highlights the complex relationship between hormonal changes and disgust sensitivity during pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有人认为COVID-19大流行是一种潜在的创伤性事件,可能会引起广泛性焦虑和不适,特别是在患有精神疾病的易感人群中。称为眼球运动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)的治疗方法已被证明可以成功地帮助患者处理创伤事件并恢复健康。然而,关于EMDR促进症状恢复的确切过程知之甚少。
    为了解决这些问题,我们进行了一项随机对照试验(ClinicalTrials.govIdentifierNCT06110702),纳入了来自大学医院的107名参与者作为研究样本.对参与者进行随机分配,以将他们分配给实验组和对照组。实验组,但不是对照组,接受了为期8周的EMDR干预.身体感知,厌恶,内疚和羞耻的情绪,以及精神污染和创伤后强迫症状,在EMDR干预前后进行了调查。
    EMDR干预能够改善所研究的所有变量。路径分析表明,身体感知能够预测厌恶和内疚和羞耻的情绪。厌恶能够预测精神污染和强迫症状,而内疚和羞愧能够预测创伤后的症状。
    EMDR是治疗创伤后和强迫性症状的有效疗法,通过促进内/羞耻和厌恶情绪的改善起作用,分别。检查了对临床实践的影响。
    https://www.clinicaltrials.gov,标识符NCT06110702。
    UNASSIGNED: It has been suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic was a potentially traumatic occurrence that may have induced generalized anxiety and discomfort, particularly in susceptible populations like individuals with mental illnesses. The therapeutic approach known as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been shown to be successful in helping patients process traumatic events and restore wellbeing. Nevertheless, little is known about the precise processes through which EMDR fosters symptom recovery.
    UNASSIGNED: In order to disentangle these issues, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06110702) with 107 participants who were selected from university hospitals as a sample of investigation. Random assignments were applied to the participants in order to assign them to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group, but not the control group, underwent an 8-week EMDR intervention. Body perception, disgust, and emotions of guilt and shame, as well as mental contamination and posttraumatic and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, were investigated before and after the EMDR intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: The EMDR intervention was able to improve all of the variables investigated. Path analysis showed that body perception was able to predict both disgust and emotions of guilt and shame. Disgust was able to predict both mental contamination and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, while guilt and shame were able to predict post-traumatic symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: EMDR is an effective therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic and obsessive symptoms that acts through the promotion of improvement of the emotions of guilt/shame and disgust, respectively. Implications for clinical practice are examined.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT06110702.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对身体气味的厌恶敏感性在一系列心理机制中起作用,这些机制被认为是为了避免病原体而进化的。为了评估体臭厌恶的个体差异,我们以前开发了体味厌恶量表(BODS),并用英语进行了验证。BODS提出了六种情况,其中来自内部来源和外部来源的气味可能会引起厌恶。本研究旨在验证意大利人口的BODS,并找到其结构的进一步证据,construct,和标准有效性。
    我们使用了两个大样本(分别为N=1,050,F=527;和N=402,F=203),它们代表了意大利人口的性别和年龄。
    在这两项研究中,我们证实了假设的双因素结构,所有物品都加载到一般的体臭厌恶敏感度上,以及与内部结构相关的两个具体因素。就结构效度而言,我们发现BODS与三域厌恶量表(TDDS)的病原体厌恶敏感性趋同,但与经历负面情绪的一般倾向不同。BODS在预测COVID-19回避行为的行为意图方面表现出标准有效性,尽管与TDDS病原体亚量表相比,它似乎并不逐步有效。我们还建立了关于性别的BODS的标量测量不变性,并发现女性的BODS水平较高。
    意大利版BODS的结果表明其结构,construct,法理学和标准有效性。此外,我们关于厌恶敏感性性别差异的结果与以前的文献一致,我们在跨文化和灵长类动物发现的更广泛背景下讨论它们,这些发现指向这种差异的可能的进化解释。
    UNASSIGNED: Disgust sensitivity to body odors plays a role in a set of psychological mechanisms supposedly evolved to avoid pathogens. To assess individual differences in body odor disgust, we previously developed the body odor disgust scale (BODS) and validated it in English. The BODS presents six scenarios where disgust could be evoked by smells coming from an internal source and an external source. The present study aimed to validate the BODS in the Italian population and to find further evidence for its structural, construct, and criterion validity.
    UNASSIGNED: We used two large samples (N = 1,050, F = 527; and N = 402, F = 203, respectively) that were representative of the Italian population for sex and age.
    UNASSIGNED: Across these two studies, we confirmed the hypothesized bifactor structure, with all the items loading onto a general body odor disgust sensitivity factor, and on two specific factors related to the internal structure. In terms of construct validity, we found that the BODS converged with pathogen disgust sensitivity of the three-domain disgust scale (TDDS) but was distinct from a general propensity to experience negative emotions. The BODS showed criterion validity in predicting the behavioral intentions toward COVID-19 avoidance behavior, although it did not seem to be incrementally valid when compared to the TDDS pathogen subscale. We also established scalar measurement invariance of the BODS regarding gender and found that women display higher levels of BODS.
    UNASSIGNED: Results from the Italian version of the BODS indicate its structural, construct, nomological and criterion validity. Furthermore, our result on sex differences in disgust sensitivity are consistent with previous literature, and we discuss them in the broader context of cross-cultural and primate findings that points toward a possible evolutionary explanation of this difference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在情感的处理中,大脑准备和反应的独特的方式取决于负面或积极的细微差别的情绪激发。以前的调查表明,阴性诱导子通常比阳性和中性诱导子引起更强烈的神经活动,如事件相关电位(ERP)晚期后验阳性(LPP)复合体的所有子分量的振幅增加所反映的那样,而对厌恶情绪的了解较少。本研究旨在检查在厌恶刺激的处理过程中,LPP复合物是否比其他具有负或正效价的情绪激发者显示出更大的振幅,从而证实了它在早期或后期是厌恶相关的负偏性的神经标记。因此,在本研究中,我们在执行情感自我管理的视觉刺激任务期间利用ERP技术来解开与正面图像相关的神经贡献,负,厌恶,或中性情绪。至关重要的是,我们表明,在自我给药过程中,用厌恶激发子处理引起了最大的神经活动和最大的延迟。总的来说,与所有其他情绪相比,我们证明了与情绪激发者的不愉快和厌恶的特殊处理相关的进行性神经活动。
    In the processing of emotions, the brain prepares and reacts in distinctive manners depending upon the negative or positive nuance of the emotion elicitors. Previous investigations showed that negative elicitors generally evoke more intense neural activities than positive and neutral ones, as reflected in the augmented amplitude of all sub-components of the event-related potentials (ERP) late posterior positivity (LPP) complex, while less is known about the emotion of disgust. The present study aimed to examine whether the LPP complex during the processing of disgust stimuli showed greater amplitude than other emotion elicitors with negative or positive valences, thus confirming it as a neural marker of disgust-related negativity bias at earlier or later stages. Thus, in the present study, we leveraged the ERP technique during the execution of an affective self-administered visual stimuli task to disentangle the neural contributions associated with images of positive, negative, disgust, or neutral emotions. Crucially, we showed that handling with disgust elicitors prompted the greatest neural activity and the highest delay during self-administration. Overall, we demonstrated progressive neural activities associated with the unpleasantness of the emotion elicitors and peculiar processing for disgust compared with all other emotions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经前烦躁不安是一种抑郁症,影响5%-8%的月经周期的人。尽管有证据表明面部情绪检测在抑郁症中发生了变化,增强了对负面情绪(负面偏见)的检测,关于经前烦躁不安的研究很少。
    这项研究的目的是调查经前烦躁不安的症状和经前阶段对面部情绪检测的准确性和强度的影响。
    横截面准实验设计。
    面部情绪检测任务被分配给72名出生时没有经前烦躁不安的女性个体(n=30),和临时PMDD(n=42),基于《精神障碍的回顾性诊断和统计手册-基于第五版的经前烦躁不安症的测量》。无论月经周期阶段如何,都检查了面部情绪检测,作为经前阶段的函数(是的,no).该任务使用中性至情绪的面部表情变形(15张图像/变形)。参与者指出了在渐进强度变体中针对每个图像检测到的情绪。对于所有六种基本情绪(悲伤,生气,恐惧,快乐,厌恶,和惊喜),计算了两个分数:响应的准确性和首次检测到正确情绪的形态内的强度(图像编号)。
    报告经前烦躁不安的中度/重度症状的个人对厌恶的检测更准确和更早,不管周期阶段。此外,那些患有暂时性经前焦虑障碍的人更早发现了悲伤的情绪。还出现了经前烦躁障碍组×周期阶段的相互作用:报告经前烦躁障碍症状的个体与周期的其余部分相比,在经前阶段更准确地检测面部情绪,对悲伤的情绪有很大的影响。
    研究结果表明,报告经前烦躁不安症状的个体的面部情绪处理增强,特别是悲伤和厌恶。然而,复制需要更大的样本和前瞻性设计。这种经前焦虑障碍经前情绪检测优势表明经前综合征/经前焦虑障碍的适应性认知机制,并挑战围绕经前经历的耻辱。
    患有严重经前综合症或可能有经前痛觉障碍的女性更擅长识别人们脸上的情绪表达,特别是在经前阶段,经前焦虑障碍是一种抑郁症,影响女性,她们在经前阶段(即月经前一周)经历情绪和身体症状。这是一种严重的经前综合症。研究表明,抑郁症可以影响面部情绪识别。准确地识别他人的情绪是一项重要的技能,可以帮助我们发展社会关系,保持自己和他人的安全。快速识别面部情绪使我们能够理解和支持他人,并通过识别其他人的情绪反应来快速识别危险情况。这项研究的目的是研究经前烦躁不安的症状和经前阶段如何影响女性识别和识别他人脸上情绪的能力。共有72名妇女(42名患有经前烦躁不安症,30没有经前烦躁不安的障碍)完成了面部情绪检测任务。这项任务衡量了女性能够检测到幸福的准确性和早期程度,悲伤,愤怒,恐惧,惊喜,厌恶的脸。患有经前烦躁不安症的中度/重度症状的女性更准确和更早地检测到厌恶,不管他们在月经周期的什么地方。患有经前烦躁不安症的女性较早发现悲伤情绪。此外,经前烦躁不安的女性在经前阶段进行测试时,更准确地检测面部情绪,在检测悲伤情绪方面尤其准确。研究结果表明,患有经前焦虑障碍的女性在检测面部情绪方面更好,并表现出经前焦虑障碍经前情绪检测的优势。经前烦躁不安的女性倾向于更好地检测他人的情绪,特别是当他们处于经前周期阶段时,会有好处。作为经前期综合征对女性潜在有益影响的首批报道之一,这些发现可能有助于减少与经前焦虑障碍和经前综合征相关的耻辱。需要进一步的研究来复制和扩展这些发现。
    UNASSIGNED: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder is a depressive disorder affecting 5%-8% of people with menstrual cycles. Despite evidence that facial emotion detection is altered in depressive disorders, with enhanced detection of negative emotions (negativity bias), minimal research exists on premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
    UNASSIGNED: The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of premenstrual dysphoric disorder symptoms and the premenstrual phase on accuracy and intensity at detection of facial emotions.
    UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional quasi-experimental design.
    UNASSIGNED: The Facial Emotion Detection Task was administered to 72 individuals assigned female at birth with no premenstrual dysphoric disorder (n = 30), and provisional PMDD (n = 42), based on a retrospective Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition-based measure of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Facial emotion detection was examined both irrespective of menstrual cycle phase, and as a function of premenstrual phase (yes, no). The task used neutral-to-emotional facial expression morphs (15 images/morph). Participants indicated the emotion detected for each image within the progressive intensity morph. For all six basic emotions (sad, angry, fearful, happy, disgust, and surprise), two scores were calculated: accuracy of responses and the intensity within the morph at which the correct emotion was first detected (image number).
    UNASSIGNED: Individuals reporting moderate/severe symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder had more accurate and earlier detection of disgust, regardless of cycle phase. In addition, those with provisional premenstrual dysphoric disorder detected sad emotions earlier. A premenstrual dysphoric disorder group × cycle phase interaction also emerged: individuals reporting premenstrual dysphoric disorder symptoms were more accurate at detecting facial emotions during the premenstrual phase compared to the rest of the cycle, with a large effect size for sad emotions.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest enhanced facial emotion processing in individuals reporting symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder, particularly for sadness and disgust. However, replication is required with larger samples and prospective designs. This premenstrual dysphoric disorder premenstrual emotion detection advantage suggests an adaptive cognitive mechanism in premenstrual syndrome/premenstrual dysphoric disorder, and challenges stigma surrounding premenstrual experiences.
    Women with Severe Premenstrual Syndrome or Probable Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder are Better at Identifying Emotional Expressions on People’s Faces, Especially During the Premenstrual PhasePremenstrual dysphoric disorder is a depressive disorder affecting women where they experience emotional and physical symptoms during the premenstrual phase (i.e. the week before one’s period). It is a severe form of premenstrual syndrome. Research indicates that depression can affect facial emotion recognition. Accurately recognizing other people’s emotions is an important skill that helps us develop social connections and keep ourselves and others safe. Quick recognition of facial emotions allows us to understand and support others, and quickly identify dangerous situations by recognizing other people’s emotional responses. The goal of this study was to examine how premenstrual dysphoric disorder symptoms and the premenstrual phase may affect the ability of women to recognize and identify emotions on other people’s faces. A total of 72 women (42 with premenstrual dysphoric disorder, 30 without premenstrual dysphoric disorder) completed the Facial Emotion Detection Task. This task measured how accurate and early the women were able to detect happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, and disgust in faces. Women with moderate/severe symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder had more accurate and earlier detection of disgust, regardless of where they were in their menstrual cycle. Women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder detected sad emotions earlier. Furthermore, women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder were more accurate at detecting facial emotions when they were tested in the premenstrual phase, and were especially more accurate in detecting sad emotions. The findings suggest that women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder are better at detecting facial emotions and show a premenstrual dysphoric disorder premenstrual emotion detection advantage. This tendency for women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder to better detect emotions in others, particularly when they are in the premenstrual cycle phase, would have benefits. As one of the first reports of a potentially beneficial effect of premenstrual syndrome for women, the findings may help decrease stigma associated with premenstrual dysphoric disorder and premenstrual syndrome. Further research is needed to replicate and extend these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧洲消费者洗涤的衣物量过度增长,原因不能仅靠人口统计学来解释。试图遏制这一趋势的举措一再失败。以前的研究在很大程度上忽略了洗钱行为的心理层面。在三项独立的研究中,我们调查了厌恶程度,羞耻,清洁规范和环境认同,通过一组先前的行为介导,影响洗涤频率。我们的结果强调了厌恶敏感性和亲环境认同之间相互冲突的心理目标如何破坏改变洗衣行为的意愿。提出政策建议,并讨论了未来的研究挑战。
    The amount of laundry washed by European consumers has grown excessively for reasons that cannot be explained by demographics alone. Initiatives trying to curb this trend have repeatedly failed. Previous studies have largely overlooked the psychological dimensions of laundering behaviour. In three separate studies we investigate how disgust, shame, cleanliness norms and environmental identity, mediated through a set of preceding behaviours, affect washing frequency. Our results highlight how conflicting psychological goals between disgust sensitivity and pro-environmental identity can undermine willingness to change laundry behaviour. Policy recommendations are suggested, and future research challenges are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号