discern score

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS),育龄妇女的慢性多因素疾病,是一个重大的公共卫生问题。大多数女性求助于像“YouTube”这样的平台,这些平台构成了娱乐的完美来源,我们的目标是分析相关内容的质量。
    目的:本研究的目的和目标是通过分析DISCERN评分来评估YouTube上与PCOS相关的内容的质量和可靠性。全球质量评分(GQS),和视频功率指数(VPI)。
    方法:这是一项基于设施的横断面研究,每天进行一次,每位作者使用预定关键字在PCOS上查看YouTube上的10个视频。喜欢的数量,不喜欢,视图,注释,和上传者的背景进行了评估。否认得分,GQS,还计算了每个视频的VPI。虽然数据输入是使用微软Excel2020(微软公司,华盛顿,美国),分析使用SPSSStatistics第16版(SPSSInc.2007年发布。SPSSforWindows,版本16.0。芝加哥,SPSSInc.)。分类变量表示为频率和百分比,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验/单向ANOVA确定统计学显著性。
    结果:共分析了80个符合纳入标准的视频。大多数视频(80%)是在一年前发布的,没有更新。只有28.8%的视频内容是由医生发布的。尽管大多数视频(96.25%)分享了与症状学有关的信息,只有45%的人谈到预防。在28.75%的视频内容中注意到促销内容。GQS和VPI更好,由医生提供信息,医院,和医疗保健组织(p值分别为0.033和0.006)。
    结论:随着女性接触YouTube等寓教于乐平台,以澄清她们对数字时代PCOS等生活方式疾病的担忧,评估此类平台上可用内容的质量变得相关。这项研究的结果形成了一个原型,可以解决YouTube上现有知识的差距。此外,这些发现保证了对这些可用的基于网络的内容的频繁监控,并且只有合格的健康专家才能提供这些内容。
    BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a chronic multifactorial disorder in women of reproductive age group, is a major public health problem. With most women resorting to platforms like \"YouTube\" that form a perfect source of edutainment, our aim was to analyze the quality of content available regarding the same.
    OBJECTIVE: The aims and objectives of this study were to assess the quality and reliability of content related to PCOS on YouTube by analyzing the DISCERN score, global quality score (GQS), and video power index (VPI).
    METHODS: It was a facility-based cross-sectional study undertaken on a single day with each author reviewing 10 videos from YouTube on PCOS using predetermined keywords. The number of likes, dislikes, views, comments, and uploader backgrounds were evaluated. DISCERN score, GQS, and VPI were also calculated for each video. While data entry was done using Microsoft Excel 2020 (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, United States), the analysis was carried out using SPSS Statistics version 16 (SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.). Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages, and statistical significance was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test/one-way ANOVA.
    RESULTS: A total of 80 videos that fit the inclusion criteria were analyzed. A majority of the videos (80%) were posted a year back with no updates. Only 28.8% of the video content was posted by doctors. Though most videos (96.25%) shared information pertaining to symptomatology, only 45% spoke regarding prevention. Promotional content was noted in 28.75% of the video content. GQS and VPI were better with information being provided by doctors, hospitals, and healthcare organizations (p-value 0.033 and 0.006, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: With women reaching out to edutainment platforms like YouTube to clarify their concerns surrounding lifestyle diseases such as PCOS in the digital era, it becomes relevant to evaluate the quality of content available on such platforms. The findings of the study form a prototype for addressing the existing gaps in the knowledge available on YouTube. Furthermore, the findings warrant frequent monitoring of such available web-based content and delivery of such content only from qualified wellness experts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的胃内肉毒杆菌毒素(Botox)的应用已成为一种新型的内镜干预方法来治疗肥胖。YouTube是经常用于访问健康相关信息的主要在线平台之一。鉴于此,这项研究旨在评估YouTube上有关胃肉毒杆菌的信息视频的准确性和可靠性。材料与方法2023年7月,通过在YouTube上查询\"胃肉毒杆菌\",对YouTube上的胃肉毒杆菌信息视频进行综合评价。最初共审查了70个视频,普通外科医生对48个视频进行了仔细分析。视频根据其来源和属性进行分类,并使用标准量表进行评估,例如《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)评分,修改后的DISCERN,和全球质量量表(GQS)。结果共评估了48个视频。其中,2.1%来自学术机构,20.8%来自私立医院/机构,52.1%来自医生。其他医疗保健专业人员的视频占2.1%,健康信息网站12.5%,和独立用户10.4%。不同来源的视频持续时间显著不同(p<0.001)。独立用户视频的喜欢/观看次数最高。JAMA评分(p=0.009)和DISCERN评分(p=0.045)显示出来源之间的显着差异。学术机构视频的JAMA中位数为4分;独立用户得分为1分。至于DISCERN,学术视频得分最高,为5,而独立用户得分最低,为1.8。结论YouTube今天充满了医疗保健信息视频。尽管基于常规评估方法的质量和可靠性评分可能是中等的,我们建议利用来自学术机构和知名健康信息网站的视频作为主要来源,对患者进行关于胃肉毒杆菌毒素的教育。
    Background and objective Intragastric botulinum toxin (Botox) applications have emerged as a novel endoscopic intervention method to treat obesity. YouTube stands out as one of the primary online platforms frequently utilized for accessing health-related information. In light of this, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of informational videos about gastric Botox on YouTube. Materials and methods In July 2023, a comprehensive evaluation of gastric Botox information videos on YouTube was conducted by querying \"Gastric Botox\" on YouTube. A total of 70 videos were initially reviewed and 48 videos were meticulously analyzed by a general surgeon. Videos were categorized based on their sources and attributes and evaluated using standard scales like the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, modified DISCERN, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Results A total of 48 videos were assessed. Of these, 2.1% originated from academic institutions, 20.8% from private hospitals/organizations, and 52.1% from physicians. Videos by other healthcare professionals accounted for 2.1%, health information websites 12.5%, and independent users 10.4%. Video durations varied significantly across sources (p<0.001). Independent user videos had the highest likes/views. JAMA scores (p=0.009) and DISCERN scores (p=0.045) showed significant differences among sources. Academic institution videos had a median JAMA score of 4; independent users scored 1. As for DISCERN, academic videos scored the highest at 5, while independent users scored the lowest at 1.8. Conclusions YouTube is filled with healthcare information videos today. Although the quality and reliability scores based on conventional assessment methods might be moderate, we advise utilizing videos from academic institutions and reputable health information websites as primary sources to educate patients about gastric Botox.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于互联网的医学教育在提高公共卫生意识和医疗专业人员的能力方面发挥着至关重要的作用;然而,它必须是可靠的。我们旨在检查上传到YouTube的视频的质量和可靠性(YouTube,LLC,圣布鲁诺,加州,美国)由专业医疗保健专业人员从2014年到2023年的脊柱侧弯。
    方法:该研究于2023年8月1日至8月15日进行。关键词\'脊柱侧弯\',\'脊柱侧凸-后凸支具\',\'脊柱侧弯练习\',\'脊柱侧弯手术\',和“脊柱侧凸-后凸运动”在YouTube上搜索。仅检查了医疗专业人员在2014年1月1日至2023年7月31日之间上传的YouTube视频,并且仅检查了英语视频。评估并记录所有视频的视频特征。使用两种不同的问卷量表评估视频的质量和可靠性,包括改良的DISCERN评分和全球质量评分(GQS)。
    结果:在2014年至2018年之间上传的视频中,每个视频的平均观看次数为3778,在2019年至2023年之间上传的视频中为3120(p=0.004)。在过去五年的视频中,视频长度和喜欢次数在统计学上显着降低(p=0.001,p=0.001)。2014年至2018年之间上传的专业视频中有31%是针对医疗保健专业人员的。在过去的五年中,该比率为12%,并且在统计学上显着降低(p=0.001)。在2014年至2018年期间,DISCERN平均得分为3.7,在2019年至2023年期间为3.2(p=0.001)。同样,过去五年的平均GQS在统计学上显着高于前五年(3.8vs.3.3,p=0.001)。
    结论:本研究确定,与过去五年相比,过去五年中有关脊柱侧凸的YouTube视频的质量和可靠性显着提高,视频持续时间显着降低。此外,在过去五年上传的视频中,患者的视频数量明显更高.相比之下,在过去五年中,YouTube视频中有关脊柱侧弯的\'like\'和\'view\'数字明显较低。
    BACKGROUND: Internet-based medical education plays a crucial role in bolstering public health awareness and the competence of medical professionals; however, it must be dependable. We aimed to examine the quality and reliability of the videos uploaded to YouTube (YouTube, LLC, San Bruno, California, United States) by professional healthcare professionals about scoliosis from 2014 to 2023.
    METHODS: The study was performed between August 1 and August 15, 2023. The keywords \'scoliosis\', \'scoliosis-kyphosis brace\', \'scoliosis exercises\', \'scoliosis surgeries\', and \'scoliosis-kyphosis exercises\' were searched on YouTube. Only YouTube videos uploaded by healthcare professionals between January 1, 2014, and July 31, 2023, and only videos in the English language were examined. Video characteristics were evaluated and recorded for all videos. The quality and reliability of videos were assessed with two different questionnaire scales including the modified DISCERN score and the Global Quality Score (GQS).
    RESULTS: The mean number of views per video was 3778 in videos uploaded between 2014 and 2018, and 3120 in videos uploaded between 2019 and 2023 (p= 0.004). Video length and number of likes were statistically significantly lower in the videos of the last five years (p=0.001, and p=0.001). Thirty-one percent of the professional videos uploaded between 2014 and 2018 were directed at healthcare professionals. This rate was 12% in the last five years and was statistically significantly lower (p=0.001). The DISCERN score average was 3.7 between 2014 and 2018 and it was 3.2 between 2019 and 2023 (p=0.001). Similarly, the mean GQS was statistically significantly higher in the last five years compared to the five years prior (3.8 vs. 3.3, p=0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study determined that the quality and reliability of YouTube videos about scoliosis significantly increased in the last five years compared to the previous five years with a significant decrease in video duration. Also, among videos uploaded in the last five years, the number of videos for the patient was significantly higher. In contrast, the \'like\' and \'view\' numbers were significantly lower in YouTube videos about scoliosis in the last five years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    导言肥胖的日益流行导致减肥和代谢手术的普及,由于公共医疗系统内的限制,经常通过医疗旅游寻求。这项研究旨在研究在医疗旅游背景下与减肥手术相关的YouTube视频的质量和影响。材料和方法2023年6月,YouTube搜索“减肥手术医疗旅游”和“肥胖手术医疗旅游”产生了前200个视频,在应用排除标准后从中选择33人.这些视频根据来源进行了进一步筛选,持续时间,和内容。使用既定的量表评估质量,包括《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)标准,全球质量量表(GQS),并修改了DISCERN评分。结果共选取33个视频进行综合分析。在视频中,48.5%描述了医疗旅游减肥手术背景下的患者体验,提供有价值的见解。这些视频有不同的持续时间和参与度指标,平均GQS得分为2.09,JAMA得分为2.57,DISCERN得分为3.06。值得注意的是,描述患者经历的视频具有鲜明的特征和较高的评估分数,强调他们在研究中的重要性。结论本研究评估了医疗旅游领域内与减肥手术相关的YouTube视频。该研究阐明了医疗旅游的各个方面,涉及肥胖手术和YouTube上传播的信息质量。尽管患者体验视频获得了更高质量的评级,整体可靠性和内容多样性强调了利用YouTube作为医疗旅游信息来源的潜力和挑战。
    Introduction The increasing prevalence of obesity has led to the popularity of bariatric and metabolic surgery, often sought through medical tourism due to constraints within public healthcare systems. This study aimed to examine the quality and impact of YouTube videos related to bariatric surgery within the context of medical tourism. Materials and methods In June 2023, a YouTube search for \"Bariatric Surgery Medical Tourism\" and \"Obesity Surgery Medical Tourism\" yielded the top 200 videos, from which 33 were chosen after applying exclusion criteria. These videos underwent further screening based on source, duration, and content. Quality was assessed using established scales, including the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and modified DISCERN score. Results Thirty-three videos were chosen for comprehensive analysis. Among the videos, 48.5% portrayed patient experiences in the context of medical tourism bariatric surgery, providing valuable insights. The videos had varying durations and engagement metrics, with an average GQS score of 2.09, JAMA score of 2.57, and DISCERN score of 3.06. Notably, videos depicting patient experiences had distinct characteristics and higher evaluation scores, emphasizing their significance within the study. Conclusion This study assessed YouTube videos related to bariatric surgery within the realm of medical tourism. The research illuminated diverse facets of medical tourism concerning obesity surgery and the quality of information disseminated on YouTube. Although patient experience videos received higher quality ratings, the overall reliability and content diversity underscored the potential and challenges of utilizing YouTube as an information source for medical tourism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在评估YouTube上可用的疾病信息的质量和可靠性(www。youtube.com)关于“心脏病发作”或心肌梗塞,使用全局质量评分(GQS)进行质量,可靠性的否认得分,和视频功率指数(VPI)的普及。
    方法:在这项横断面观察研究中,YouTube视频是根据上传者的类型进行分析的,内容,和其他因素。GQS,否认得分,和视频功率指数(VPI)用于评估质量,可靠性,和信息的普及,分别。
    结果:大部分视频(78.44%)是一年前上传的。只有33.34%和7.84%是由医生和医疗机构上传的,分别。大约72.55%的视频包含有关症状的信息,66.67%的人讨论了原因,52.94%覆盖治疗,47.06%侧重于预防。此外,41.18%提供了调查细节,而只有19.61%涉及死亡率。患者创作的视频占内容的19.61%,15.69%的视频包括宣传材料。
    结论:我们研究的主要结果表明,关于心肌梗塞的YouTube视频表现出高质量的内容,由较高的平均GQS分数支持。在我们的研究中发现的一致的信息质量表明,YouTube可以作为一个额外的平台,分享知识和教育个人关于这一重要的健康状况。通过提高认识和提供准确的信息,这些视频可以帮助早期发现,预防,对于有心肌梗死风险的个体,以及更好的结果。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of the disease information available on YouTube (www.youtube.com) about \"heart attacks\" or myocardial infarctions, using a Global Quality Score (GQS) for quality, a DISCERN score for reliability, and a Video Power Index (VPI) for popularity.
    METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, the YouTube videos were analyzed in terms of the type of uploader, content, and other factors. The GQS, DISCERN score, and Video Power Index (VPI) were utilized to assess the quality, reliability, and popularity of the information, respectively.
    RESULTS: The majority of the videos (78.44%) were uploaded over a year ago. Only 33.34% and 7.84% were uploaded by doctors and healthcare organizations, respectively. Around 72.55% of the videos contained information about symptoms, 66.67% discussed the causes, 52.94% covered treatment, and 47.06% focused on prevention. Additionally, 41.18% provided details on investigations, while only 19.61% touched upon mortality. Patient-created videos accounted for 19.61% of the content, and 15.69% of the videos included promotional material.
    CONCLUSIONS: The main outcome of our study indicates that the YouTube videos examined regarding myocardial infarctions exhibit high-quality content, as supported by a higher average GQS score. The consistent quality of information discovered in our study suggests that YouTube can serve as an additional platform for sharing knowledge and educating individuals about this important health condition. By raising awareness and delivering accurate information, these videos can help in early detection, prevention, and better outcomes for individuals who are at risk of experiencing a myocardial infarction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的目的是阐明有关YouTubeTM上冠状动脉旁路移植术的英语视频的可靠性和质量。
    该研究在7月16日至7月30日之间进行。一名心血管外科医生搜索了包括“冠状动脉疾病”的术语,冠状动脉治疗,\"\"冠状动脉搭桥\"和\"冠状动脉搭桥手术,\"在YouTubeTM中。根据上传视频的来源,将所有视频分为两组,分为专业视频和非专业视频。视频特征,包括YouTube™上的视频持续时间,视频长度,并记录了每个视频的观看编号。此外,“评论的数量,\"\"喜欢,注意到“”和“不喜欢”。此外,对视频的目标受众(专业医护人员和患者)进行了分析,计算每个视频的DISCERN评分和全局质量评分(GQS)。
    完全,根据上传来源,812个视频分为两组;448个视频被归类为专业视频,364个视频被归类为非专业视频。专业视频的平均观看次数为3220.5,非专业视频为2216.5(p=0.001)。此外,对于专业视频,平均“喜欢”数字和平均评论数字明显更高(p=0.001和p=0.001)。专业视频的平均DISCERN评分为2.6,非专业视频为1.5(p=0.001)。同样,专业视频的平均GSQ明显更高(3.5vs.2.5,p=0.001)。
    由专业医护人员共享的YouTube™视频具有更好的质量和可靠性,DISCERN评分和GQS明显更高。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to clarify the reliability and quality of English videos about Coronary artery bypass grafting on YouTubeTM.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was performed between July 16 and July 30. A cardiovascular surgeon searched for terms including \"coronary artery disease,\" \"coronary artery treatment,\" \"coronary artery bypass\" and \"coronary artery bypass surgery,\" in YouTubeTM. All videos were classified into two groups according to the source who uploaded the video as professional videos and non-professional videos. Video characteristics including duration of video on YouTube™, length of video, and view numbers for each video were recorded. Moreover, the numbers of \"comments,\" \"likes,\" and \"dislikes\" were noted. Furthermore, the target audience of the videos (professional health care worker and patients) was analyzed, DISCERN score and Global quality score (GQS) were calculated for each video.
    UNASSIGNED: Totally, 812 videos were divided into two groups according to upload sources; 448 videos were categorized as professional videos and 364 videos were categorized as non-professional videos. The mean number of views was 3220.5 for professional videos and 2216.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). In addition, the mean \"like\" numbers and mean comment numbers were significantly higher for professional videos (p=0.001 and p=0.001). The mean DISCERN score was 2.6 for professional videos and 1.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). Similarly, the mean GSQ was significantly higher for professional videos (3.5 vs. 2.5, p=0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: YouTube™ videos which are shared by professional healthcare workers have better quality and reliability with significantly higher DISCERN score and GQS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介先天性鼻泪管阻塞(CNLDO)会导致眼睛过度撕裂或粘液排出。全球20%的一岁儿童有CNLDO。有许多信息来源提供给父母。这项研究评估了与CNLDO相关的YouTube视频的质量和准确性。方法对YouTube搜索引擎中键入“先天性鼻泪管阻塞”后出现的前100个视频进行评估。还使用DISCERN对这些视频进行了分析和评分,美国医学会杂志(JAMA),和全球质量评分(GQS)系统。结果40个视频符合纳入标准。平均DISCERN评分为47.3±9.15,JAMA为1.72±0.87,GQS为3.1±0.81。非医师组上传的视频的持续时间明显更长(p=0.04)。此外,医师组上传的视频的JAMA评分显著高于其他组(p=0.03).理论视频比手术视频长(p=0.02)。DISCERN,JAMA,在理论视频组中,GQS评分在统计学上较高(分别为p=0.002,p=0.04和p=0.03).结论根据我们的研究,有关先天性鼻泪管阻塞的YouTube视频质量一般.可以通过制作具有有关疾病和理论信息的更详细信息的视频来改善此信息源,以及让卫生专业人员查看已上传的内容。
    Introduction Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) causes excessive eye tearing or mucoid discharge. Twenty percent of one-year-olds globally have CNLDO. There are many sources that offer information to parents. This study evaluates the quality and accuracy of CNLDO-related YouTube videos. Methods The first 100 videos that appeared after typing \"congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction\" in the YouTube search engine were evaluated. These videos were also analyzed and scored using the DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and Global Quality Scoring (GQS) systems. Results Forty videos met the inclusion criteria. The mean DISCERN score was 47.3 ± 9.15, JAMA was 1.72 ± 0.87, and GQS was 3.1 ± 0.81. The duration of the videos uploaded by the non-physician group was significantly longer (p = 0.04). In addition, the JAMA score of the videos uploaded by the physician group was significantly higher than that of the other group (p = 0.03). Theoretical videos were longer than surgical videos (p = 0.02). DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were statistically higher in the theoretical video group (p = 0.002, p = 0.04, and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion According to our research, the quality of YouTube videos about congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is average. This information source can be improved by making videos with more detailed information about the disease and theoretical information, as well as by having health professionals look over the content that has been uploaded.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估有关甲状腺眼眶病的YouTube视频的质量和可靠性。
    方法:使用关键字\'Graves眼病\'进行了YouTube搜索,\'甲状腺眼病\',\'甲状腺眼眶病\',在YouTube的搜索栏中\''甲状腺眼病\'。对每个关键词的前50个视频进行了分析,前100个视频被纳入研究。视图的数量,喜欢,不喜欢,注释,每日观看率(每天观看次数),上传的源,原产国,视频类型(患者体验,学术信息),并对所有视频的治疗技术进行了评估。他们还被评估了关于他们的发现,美国医学会杂志(JAMA),两名独立眼科医生的全球质量评分(GQS)和有用性评分。
    结果:在前100个视频中,94个视频符合标准。意思是否定的,JAMA,GQS和有用性评分分别为55.27±16.57、3.04±0.64、3.44±0.93和3.23±1.1。如果我们看看上传源53(56.4%)视频是由医生上传的,30(31.9%)个机构/私营卫生机构的视频,7(7.4%)健康频道的视频,4(4.3%)的患者视频。所有评分系统显示出彼此具有统计学意义和强的正相关性(p<0.001)。观看率之间存在统计学上显著的正相关,喜欢和评论被观察到。随着视频持续时间的增加,观察到其他评分的评分显著增加.
    结论:我们观察到我们在评分中使用的测试相互关联。YouTube上的大多数甲状腺眼眶病视频质量很好。眼科医生应该指导想要在YouTube上获取信息的患者观看医疗保健专业人员上传的视频。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos about Thyroid Orbitopathy.
    METHODS: A YouTube search was performed using the keyword \'Graves eye disease\', \'thyroid eye disease\', \'thyroid orbitopathy\', \'thyroid ophtalmopathy\' in the search bar of YouTube. The first 50 videos were analyzed for each keywords, and the first 100 videos that came out were included in the study. The numbers of views, likes, dislikes, comments, daily viewing rate (number of views per day), uploaded source, country of origin, video type (patient experience, scholarly information), and described treatment technique were evaluated for all videos. They were also evaluated regarding their DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), global quality score (GQS) and usefulness score by two independent ophthalmologists.
    RESULTS: Of the top 100 videos, 94 videos met the criteria. The mean DISCERN, JAMA, GQS and usefulness score were 55.27 ± 16.57, 3.04 ± 0.64, 3.44 ± 0.93 and 3.23 ± 1.1. If we look at the upload source 53 (56.4%) videos were uploaded by physicians, 30 (31.9%) videos by institutions/private health institutions, 7 (7.4%) videos by health channels, 4 (4.3%) videos by patients. All scoring systems showed a statistically significant and strong positive correlation with each other (p < 0.001). A statistically significant positive correlation between viewing rate, likes and comments was observed. As the duration of the video increased, a significant increase in the scores in other scores was observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: We observed that the tests we used in the scoring were correlated with each other. Most of the thyroid orbitopathy videos on YouTube were of good quality. Ophthalmologists should guide their patients who want to get information on YouTube to watch videos uploaded by health care professionals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在分析YouTube上作为葡萄膜炎教育资源的视频的质量。
    方法:使用关键字“葡萄膜炎”进行了在线YouTube搜索。总视图计数,视频的持续时间,发布日期,喜欢和不喜欢,评论的数量,并记录了视频的来源。使用DISCERN评分评估视频教育内容的质量和准确性,全球质量评分(GQS),和美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分。视频功率指数(VPI)用于评估视频的观看率等。所有视频都根据出版商和类别类型进行分类。
    结果:在分析的200个视频中,94人包括在内。平均DISCERN评分为38.5±13.2(差),平均JAMA评分为1.8±0.6(一般),GQS为2.5±0.9(公平)。三个检查表之间存在正相关(p<.001)。VPI与各评分无相关性(p>.05)。最常见的上传来源是眼科医生(24.4%)和关于健康的YouTube频道(20.2%)。关于内容,我们确定了47(50%)医学教育,26(27.6%)患者教育,16(17%)患者经验,和五个(5.3%)涉及葡萄膜炎患者的外科手术视频。虽然最受欢迎的视频是由眼科医生以外的医生上传的,学术机构和医疗保健专业协会上传的视频被发现具有更高的教育质量和可靠性分数。
    结论:YouTube上的葡萄膜炎视频质量和可靠性较差,对患者没有足够的教育。因此,医生必须意识到YouTube的局限性,并确保向患者提供正确的医疗信息。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the quality of videos on YouTube as educational resources about uveitis.
    METHODS: An online YouTube search was performed using the keyword \"uveitis\". Total view counts, duration of videos, publishing dates, likes and dislikes, numbers of comments, and source of videos were recorded. The quality and accuracy of the video\'s educational content were evaluated using the DISCERN score, Global Quality Score (GQS), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score. Video power index (VPI) was used to evaluate both the view and the like ratio of the videos. All videos were classified according to publishers and types of categories.
    RESULTS: From among the 200 videos analyzed, 94 were included. The mean DISCERN score was 38.5 ± 13.2 (poor), the mean JAMA score was 1.8 ± 0.6 (fair), and the GQS was 2.5 ± 0.9 (fair). There were positive correlations between the three checklists (p < .001). VPI was not correlated with each score (p > .05). The most common upload sources were ophthalmologists (24.4%) and YouTube channels about health (20.2%). Regarding content, we identified 47 (50%) medical education, 26 (27.6%) patient education, 16 (17%) patient experience, and five (5.3%) surgical procedure videos involving patients with uveitis. While the most popular videos were uploaded by doctors other than ophthalmologists, the videos uploaded by academic institutions and associations of healthcare professional were found to have higher educational quality and reliability scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: Uveitis videos on YouTube are of poor quality and reliability and are not adequately educational for patients. Therefore, physicians must be aware of the limitations of YouTube and ensure the flow of correct medical information to patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的目的是评估YouTube上有关Fuchs内皮角膜营养不良(FECD)的视频的质量和可靠性。
    在未更改网站的标准搜索首选项的情况下,对“FECD”一词进行了YouTube搜索。录制了前100个视频。总共评估了71个视频的DISCERN评分(最小-最大:16-75),美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分(最小-最大:0-4),和全球质量量表(GQS)评分(最小-最大:0-5)。
    平均DISCERN评分为40.1±15.6(中等),平均JAMA评分为2.01±0.7(差),平均GQS评分为2.5±1.3(中等),平均视频功率指数得分为106.8±135.7。二十三段视频(32.4%)由医生上传,25(35.2%)由大学/私立医院,和21(29.6%)的健康渠道。36个视频(50.7%)包含有关疾病的信息,24(33.8%)讨论了手术技术,11例(15.5%)是关于患者的经历.
    YouTube仅提供有关FECD的中等质量健康信息。医生和专业组织应该意识到并接受这种不断发展的技术,以提高对FECD的认识。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to assess the quality and reliability of videos on Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) on YouTube.
    UNASSIGNED: A search of YouTube was performed for the term \"FECD\" without any changes to the website\'s standard search preferences. The first 100 videos were recorded. A total of 71 videos were evaluated regarding the DISCERN score (min-max: 16-75), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score (min-max: 0-4), and Global Quality Scale (GQS) score (min-max: 0-5).
    UNASSIGNED: The mean DISCERN score was 40.1±15.6 (moderate), the mean JAMA score was 2.01±0.7 (poor), the mean GQS score was 2.5±1.3 (moderate), and the mean video power index score was 106.8±135.7. Twenty-three of the videos (32.4%) were uploaded by physicians, 25 (35.2%) by universities/private hospitals, and 21 (29.6%) by health channels. Thirty-six videos (50.7%) contained information about the disease, 24 (33.8%) discussed surgical techniques, and 11 (15.5%) were about patient experience.
    UNASSIGNED: YouTube provides only moderate-quality health information on FECD. Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about FECD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号