PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to clarify the reliability and quality of English videos about Coronary artery bypass grafting on YouTubeTM.
UNASSIGNED: The study was performed between July 16 and July 30. A cardiovascular surgeon searched for terms including \"coronary artery disease,\" \"coronary artery treatment,\" \"coronary artery bypass\" and \"coronary artery bypass surgery,\" in YouTubeTM. All videos were classified into two groups according to the source who uploaded the video as professional videos and non-professional videos. Video characteristics including duration of video on YouTube™, length of video, and view numbers for each video were recorded. Moreover, the numbers of \"comments,\" \"likes,\" and \"dislikes\" were noted. Furthermore, the target audience of the videos (professional health care worker and patients) was analyzed, DISCERN score and Global quality score (GQS) were calculated for each video.
UNASSIGNED: Totally, 812 videos were divided into two groups according to upload sources; 448 videos were categorized as professional videos and 364 videos were categorized as non-professional videos. The mean number of views was 3220.5 for professional videos and 2216.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). In addition, the mean \"like\" numbers and mean comment numbers were significantly higher for professional videos (p=0.001 and p=0.001). The mean DISCERN score was 2.6 for professional videos and 1.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). Similarly, the mean GSQ was significantly higher for professional videos (3.5 vs. 2.5, p=0.001).
UNASSIGNED: YouTube™ videos which are shared by professional healthcare workers have better quality and reliability with significantly higher DISCERN score and GQS.
UNASSIGNED: The study was performed between July 16 and July 30. A cardiovascular surgeon searched for terms including \"coronary artery disease,\" \"coronary artery treatment,\" \"coronary artery bypass\" and \"coronary artery bypass surgery,\" in YouTubeTM. All videos were classified into two groups according to the source who uploaded the video as professional videos and non-professional videos. Video characteristics including duration of video on YouTube™, length of video, and view numbers for each video were recorded. Moreover, the numbers of \"comments,\" \"likes,\" and \"dislikes\" were noted. Furthermore, the target audience of the videos (professional health care worker and patients) was analyzed, DISCERN score and Global quality score (GQS) were calculated for each video.
UNASSIGNED: Totally, 812 videos were divided into two groups according to upload sources; 448 videos were categorized as professional videos and 364 videos were categorized as non-professional videos. The mean number of views was 3220.5 for professional videos and 2216.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). In addition, the mean \"like\" numbers and mean comment numbers were significantly higher for professional videos (p=0.001 and p=0.001). The mean DISCERN score was 2.6 for professional videos and 1.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). Similarly, the mean GSQ was significantly higher for professional videos (3.5 vs. 2.5, p=0.001).
UNASSIGNED: YouTube™ videos which are shared by professional healthcare workers have better quality and reliability with significantly higher DISCERN score and GQS.
摘要：
■该研究的目的是阐明有关YouTubeTM上冠状动脉旁路移植术的英语视频的可靠性和质量。
■该研究在7月16日至7月30日之间进行。一名心血管外科医生搜索了包括“冠状动脉疾病”的术语，冠状动脉治疗，\"\"冠状动脉搭桥\"和\"冠状动脉搭桥手术,\"在YouTubeTM中。根据上传视频的来源，将所有视频分为两组，分为专业视频和非专业视频。视频特征，包括YouTube™上的视频持续时间，视频长度,并记录了每个视频的观看编号。此外，“评论的数量，\"\"喜欢,注意到“”和“不喜欢”。此外，对视频的目标受众(专业医护人员和患者)进行了分析，计算每个视频的DISCERN评分和全局质量评分(GQS)。
■完全,根据上传来源，812个视频分为两组；448个视频被归类为专业视频，364个视频被归类为非专业视频。专业视频的平均观看次数为3220.5，非专业视频为2216.5（p=0.001）。此外,对于专业视频，平均“喜欢”数字和平均评论数字明显更高（p=0.001和p=0.001）。专业视频的平均DISCERN评分为2.6，非专业视频为1.5（p=0.001）。同样，专业视频的平均GSQ明显更高(3.5vs.2.5，p=0.001）。
■由专业医护人员共享的YouTube™视频具有更好的质量和可靠性，DISCERN评分和GQS明显更高。
■该研究在7月16日至7月30日之间进行。一名心血管外科医生搜索了包括“冠状动脉疾病”的术语，冠状动脉治疗，\"\"冠状动脉搭桥\"和\"冠状动脉搭桥手术,\"在YouTubeTM中。根据上传视频的来源，将所有视频分为两组，分为专业视频和非专业视频。视频特征，包括YouTube™上的视频持续时间，视频长度,并记录了每个视频的观看编号。此外，“评论的数量，\"\"喜欢,注意到“”和“不喜欢”。此外，对视频的目标受众(专业医护人员和患者)进行了分析，计算每个视频的DISCERN评分和全局质量评分(GQS)。
■完全,根据上传来源，812个视频分为两组；448个视频被归类为专业视频，364个视频被归类为非专业视频。专业视频的平均观看次数为3220.5，非专业视频为2216.5（p=0.001）。此外,对于专业视频，平均“喜欢”数字和平均评论数字明显更高（p=0.001和p=0.001）。专业视频的平均DISCERN评分为2.6，非专业视频为1.5（p=0.001）。同样，专业视频的平均GSQ明显更高(3.5vs.2.5，p=0.001）。
■由专业医护人员共享的YouTube™视频具有更好的质量和可靠性，DISCERN评分和GQS明显更高。
