colorectal liver metastasis

结直肠肝转移
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)在结直肠癌的临床治疗中具有挑战性。对CRLM的发展进行了有限的研究。从基因表达综合(GEO)和癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)获得RNA测序数据。四种机器学习算法用于筛选集线器CRLM特定基因,包括最小绝对收缩和选择算子(Lasso),随机森林,SVM-RFE,和XGboost。使用逐步逻辑回归开发了用于识别CRLM的模型,并使用内部和独立的数据集进行了验证。使用Lasso-Cox方法评估中枢CRLM特异性基因的预后价值。使用SW620细胞进行体外实验。基于四个CRLM特异性基因(SPP1,ZG16,P2RY14和PRKAR2B)开发了CRLM鉴定模型,模型疗效使用GSE41258和三个外部队列进行验证.五个CRLM特异性预后中枢基因,SPP1、ZG16、P2RY14、CYP2E1和C5使用Lasso-Cox算法进行鉴定,并构建了风险评分。使用GSE39582队列验证风险评分。三个基因在鉴定CRLM和预后价值方面都有功效:ZG16,P2RY14和SPP1。免疫浸润和富集分析表明,SPP1与M2巨噬细胞极化和细胞外基质重塑有关。体外实验表明,SPP1可能是一种促癌因子。集线器CRLM特异性基因SPP1可以帮助确定诊断,预后,和CRLM患者的免疫浸润。
    Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is challenging in the clinical treatment of colorectal cancer. Limited research has been conducted on how CRLM develops. RNA sequencing data were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Four machine learning algorithms were used to screen the hub CRLM-specific genes, including Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso), Random forest, SVM-RFE, and XGboost. The model for identifying CRLM was developed using stepwise logistic regression and was validated using internal and independent datasets. The prognostic value of hub CRLM-specific genes was assessed using the Lasso-Cox method. The in vitro experiments were performed using SW620 cells. The CRLM identification model was developed based on four CRLM-specific genes (SPP1, ZG16, P2RY14, and PRKAR2B), and the model efficacy was validated using GSE41258 and three external cohorts. Five CRLM-specific prognostic hub genes, SPP1, ZG16, P2RY14, CYP2E1, and C5, were identified using the Lasso-Cox algorithm, and a risk score was constructed. The risk score was validated using the GSE39582 cohort. Three genes have both efficacy in identifying CRLM and prognostic value: ZG16, P2RY14, and SPP1. Immune infiltration and enrichment analyses demonstrated that SPP1 was associated with M2 macrophage polarization and extracellular matrix remodeling. In vitro experiments indicated that SPP1 may act as a cancer-promoting factor. The hub CRLM-specific gene SPP1 can help determine the diagnosis, prognosis, and immune infiltration of patients with CRLM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究比较了腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)与开腹肝切除术(OLR)治疗结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的疗效。
    对相关文献进行了系统综述,以评估一系列重要的手术和肿瘤结局。
    研究结果表明,与开腹肝切除术相比,微创手术(MIS)并未显著延长手术时间,并且显著降低输血率和减少术中失血量。虽然一些研究支持MIS较低的并发症发生率,其他人没有建立统计学上的显著差异.一项研究发现,MIS组术后死亡率较低。此外,MIS始终与住院时间较短相关,表明术后恢复加快。关于肿瘤学结果,虽然某些荟萃分析报告MIS组的癌症复发率较低,其他人没有发现明显的差异。MIS和开放肝切除组之间的总生存率和无病生存率保持相当。
    分析强调了LLR在手术结果方面的潜在优势,并与该领域的现有文献发现保持一致。
    [网站],标识符[注册号]。
    UNASSIGNED: This study comprehensively compared laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) to open liver resection (OLR) in treating colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM).
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of relevant literature was conducted to assess a range of crucial surgical and oncological outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings indicate that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) did not significantly prolong the duration of surgery compared to open liver resection and notably demonstrated lower blood transfusion rates and reduced intraoperative blood loss. While some studies favored MIS for its lower complication rates, others did not establish a statistically significant difference. One study identified a lower post-operative mortality rate in the MIS group. Furthermore, MIS consistently correlated with shorter hospital stays, indicative of expedited post-operative recovery. Concerning oncological outcomes, while certain meta-analyses reported a lower rate of cancer recurrence in the MIS group, others found no significant disparity. Overall survival and disease-free survival remained comparable between the MIS and open liver resection groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The analysis emphasizes the potential advantages of LLR in terms of surgical outcomes and aligns with existing literature findings in this field.
    UNASSIGNED: [website], identifier [registration number].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景,通过肛门或阴道进行自然孔口标本提取(NOSE)是腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中常规经腹标本提取的替代方法。NOSE被证明是安全有效的,导致术后疼痛减少,镇痛使用,和改善恢复,没有肿瘤妥协。我们旨在证明NOSE用于联合结肠切除术和肝转移切除术的可行性。Methods,2022年7月至2024年4月,所有腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术和NOSE同步肝转移切除术病例均纳入研究。选择标准包括小于5cm的最大样本直径和小于35kg/m2的患者体重指数。Results,在22个月的时间里,四名连续患者(两名男性,两名女性)接受了NOSE联合切除。平均年龄和BMI分别为74.8(63-81)岁和20.9(19.5-22.3)kg/m2。患者A和D接受了乙状结肠癌的前切除术,患者B因盲肠癌接受D3右半结肠切除术,和C患者接受了结肠次全切除术,用于同步盲肠和降结肠癌。所有患者均在同一坐位进行肝转移切除术。患者A和D经肛门鼻,而患者B和C经阴道鼻。平均手术时间和失血量分别为416(330-535)分钟和338(50-500)ml。所有患者在术后前2天内胃肠功能恢复。一名需要经皮引流的患者发生肝床感染血清瘤。平均最大结肠肿瘤直径为2.9(范围1.3-4.0)cm。所有切除边缘清晰。平均随访时间为7.5个月(范围2-12个月)。Conclusions,同时行结肠切除术和肝转移瘤切除加NOSE治疗结直肠癌在高度选择的患者中是可行和安全的。导致良好的术后结果。这种概念验证分析为更大的研究得出明确的结论铺平了道路。
    Background, Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) via the anus or vagina is an alternative to conventional transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. NOSE has been shown to be safe and effective, resulting in decreased postoperative pain, analgesia use, and improved recovery, without oncological compromise. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of NOSE for combined colectomy with liver metastasectomy. Methods, From July 2022 to April 2024, all cases of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection and synchronous liver metastasectomy with NOSE were included in the study. Selection criteria included a maximum specimen diameter of less than 5 cm and patient body mass index of less than 35 kg/m2. Results, Over the 22-month duration, four consecutive patients (two males, two females) underwent combined resection with NOSE. Mean age and BMI were 74.8 (range 63-81) years and 20.9 (range 19.5-22.3) kg/m2 respectively. Patient A and D underwent anterior resection for sigmoid cancer, Patient B underwent D3 right hemicolectomy for cecal cancer, and Patient C underwent subtotal colectomy for synchronous cecal and descending colon cancer. All patients underwent liver metastasectomy at the same sitting. Patient A and D had transanal NOSE while Patients B and C underwent transvaginal NOSE. Mean operative time and blood loss was 416 (range 330-535) minutes and 338 (range 50-500) ml respectively. All patients recovered gastrointestinal function within the first two postoperative days. Infected seroma of the liver bed occurred in one patient requiring percutaneous drainage. The average maximum colon tumor diameter was 2.9 (range 1.3-4.0) cm. All resection margins were clear. Mean duration of follow-up was 7.5 (range 2-12) months. Conclusions, Simultaneous colectomy and liver metastasectomy with NOSE for colorectal cancer is feasible and safe in highly selected patients, resulting in good postoperative outcomes. This proof-of-concept analysis paves the way for larger studies to draw definitive conclusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    至少60%的结直肠癌患者在其病程中的某个时间点出现肝转移。由于取决于疾病的临床表现的竞争性治疗和复杂的治疗顺序,原发性和肝脏疾病的管理在直肠癌中具有独特的挑战性。最近,几个新颖的概念正在塑造新的治疗范式,包括时间的变化,序列,和治疗的持续时间以及治疗成分的潜在降级。总的来说,这种临床情景的治疗需要多学科评估和个性化护理;然而,在总体治疗计划的背景下,关于肝转移切除术的时机仍有相当多的争论.在这里,我们将讨论当前有关直肠癌同步肝转移治疗的文献,目前关于化疗的治疗方法,肝动脉灌注治疗的作用。
    Liver metastases are seen in at least 60% of patients with colorectal cancer at some point during the course of their disease. The management of both primary and liver disease is uniquely challenging in rectal cancer due to competing treatments and complex sequence of treatments depending on the clinical presentation of disease. Recently, several novel concepts are shaping new treatment paradigms, including changes in timing, sequence, and duration of therapies combined with potential deescalation of treatment components. Overall, the treatment of this clinical scenario mandates multidisciplinary evaluation and personalization of care; however, there is still considerable debate regarding the timing of liver metastasectomy in the context of the overall treatment plan. Herein, we will discuss the current literature on management of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, current treatment approaches with respect to chemotherapy, and role of hepatic artery infusion therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)是治疗结直肠肝转移(CRLM)的一种流行治疗方式。这项研究的目的是确定HAIC用于通过反复股动脉穿刺和5-氟尿嘧啶输注化疗以及全身辅助化疗进行高风险切除的CRLM的可行性。本研究是对前瞻性维护的数据库的回顾性回顾。所有在2022年7月至2023年7月期间因结直肠癌肝转移而接受HAIC治疗的患者均包括在内。共有12名患者被纳入研究,其中11名按计划完成了4个疗程。中位年龄为47(29-73)岁,其中9名男性(81%)和2名女性(18%)患者。直肠(n=7,63%)是最常见的主要位置。所有患者在HAIC之前接受以5-氟尿嘧啶为基础的全身化疗方案(中位12个周期)。中位转移数为2(1-8)。8例患者单叶分布有转移(73%)。HAIC治疗完成后,9例患者(64%)完全无病,中位随访时间为8个月.在手术期间或完成后,没有患者发生任何即时不良事件。常规的HAIC带来了各种挑战,例如无法获得氟尿苷和专用HAIC泵。经皮HAIC具有较低的感染机会。使用反复股骨穿刺和5FU化疗的HAIC在90%以上的患者中成功递送,使其成为CRLM治疗的可行选择。
    Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a popular treatment modality for the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of HAIC for high-risk resected CRLM delivered using repeated femoral puncture and delivering 5-fluorouracil infusional chemotherapy along with systemic adjuvant chemotherapy. The present study is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. All patients who underwent HAIC for colorectal liver metastases between July 2022 and July 2023 were included. A total of 12 patients were included in the study of which 11 completed four sessions as planned. The median age was 47 (29-73) years with nine male (81%) and two female (18%) patients. Rectum (n = 7, 63%) was the most common primary location. All patients received systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-based regimens prior to HAIC (median 12 cycles). The median number of metastasis was 2 (1-8). Eight patients had metastasis in unilobar distribution (73%). On completion of HAIC treatment, nine patients (64%) were completely disease free with a median follow-up of 8 months. None of the patients experienced any immediate adverse events during or after completion of the procedure. Conventional HAIC comes with various challenges such as unavailability of the agent floxuridine and the specialized HAIC pump. Percutaneous HAIC has a lower chance of infection. The delivery of HAIC using repeated femoral punctures and 5FU chemotherapy was successful in over 90% of the patients making it a feasible option in the treatment of CRLM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    乳糜腹水是一种罕见的病理,在肝胰胆管手术后发病率低,在联合肝分区和门静脉结扎进行分期肝切除术(ALPPS)后,国际文献中没有报道病例.它是由腹腔内淋巴液的异常积聚引起的,继发于乳糜池或其支流的阻塞或损伤。我们描述了一名49岁女性被诊断患有结肠癌和肝转移的情况。进行了ALPPS,在第一阶段和第二阶段,呈现高排水输出以及排水流体特性的变化。通过发现300mg/dL的引流液中的甘油三酸酯水平来确认乳糜性腹水的诊断。药物治疗是基于高蛋白质饮食和脂肪限制,补充中链甘油三酯和生长抑素类似物,与瘘管分辨率。它可以通过医疗来管理。
    Chylous ascites is an uncommon pathology with low incidence following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery, there are no cases reported in the international literature following the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for stage hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure. It is caused by abnormal intraperitoneal accumulation of lymph fluid in the abdominal cavity secondary to obstruction or injury to the chyle cistern or its tributaries. We describe the case of a 49-year-old woman diagnosed with colon cancer and liver metastasis. ALPPS was performed, on a first and second stage, presenting a high drainage output as well as change in the characteristics of the drainage fluid. The diagnosis of chylous ascites was confirmed by finding triglyceride levels in the drainage fluid at 300 mg/dL. Medical treatment was started based on a hyper-protein diet and fat restriction, supplemented with medium-chain triglycerides and somatostatin analog, with fistula resolution. It can be managed with medical treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手术切除是治疗同步结直肠肝转移(CRLM)的金标准。原发肿瘤和转移性病变的切除可以遵循不同的顺序:“同时”,\"肠先\",和“肝脏优先”。保守的方法,如保留实质手术和节段切除术,可以作为主要肝切除术的替代方案。全面搜索Medline,认识论,Scopus,并进行了Cochrane图书馆。包括评估接受CRLM手术并报告生存结果的患者的研究。分析了其他次要结果,包括无病生存,围手术期并发症和死亡率,和复发率。使用AMSTAR-2方法进行质量评估。总生存率无显著差异,无病生存,和次要结局在同时与“肠-先”切除比较时观察到,尽管前一组的围手术期死亡率较高。与“肝脏优先”切除相比,同时切除的5年OS明显更高。比较“肝脏优先”和“肠道优先”切除时,OS和DFS没有显着差异,或解剖到非解剖切除。我们的综述验证了同时手术是治疗SCRLM的有效肿瘤方法,尽管围手术期发病率增加的风险凸显了选择合适患者的重要性。非解剖切除可能有利于保持肝功能,并使未来的手术干预。
    Surgical resection is the gold standard for treating synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions can follow different sequences: \"simultaneous\", \"bowel-first\", and \"liver-first\". Conservative approaches, such as parenchymal-sparing surgery and segmentectomy, may serve as alternatives to major hepatectomy. A comprehensive search of Medline, Epistemonikos, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies evaluating patients who underwent surgery for CRLM and reported survival results were included. Other secondary outcomes were analyzed, including disease-free survival, perioperative complications and mortality, and recurrence rates. Quality assessment was performed using the AMSTAR-2 method. No significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, and secondary outcomes were observed when comparing simultaneous to \"bowel-first\" resections, despite a higher rate of perioperative mortality in the former group. The 5-year OS was significantly higher for simultaneous resection compared to \"liver-first\" resection. No significant differences in OS and DFS were noted when comparing \"liver-first\" to \"bowel-first\" resection, or anatomic to non-anatomic resection. Our umbrella review validates simultaneous surgery as an effective oncological approach for treating SCRLM, though the increased risk of perioperative morbidity highlights the importance of selecting suitable patients. Non-anatomic resections might be favored to preserve liver function and enable future surgical interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:欧洲内窥镜手术协会(EAES)建议,有了强有力的证据,使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光成像结合术中超声(IOUS)提高对浅表性肝脏肿瘤的鉴别。这项研究报告了在微创肝切除术中使用ICG检测结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)。
    方法:前瞻性评估了CRLM的单中心连续系列微创(腹腔镜和机器人)肝切除术(2019年4月和2023年10月)。
    结果:共纳入25例患者,11例接受腹腔镜手术,14例接受机器人手术。中位年龄为65岁(范围50-85岁)。检测到50个CRLM:20个表面,八个外生体,七个浅层(距肝表面<8毫米),和15个深(>10毫米的肝表面)的病变。术前影像学对CRLM的检出率,腹腔镜超声(LUS),ICG荧光,合并模式(ICG和LUS)为88%,90%,68%,100%,分别。ICG荧光染色使我们能够检测到五个小的其他浅表病变(其他术前/术中技术未发现)。然而,两个病灶为假阳性荧光累积。所有边缘荧光模式病变均为CRLM。ICG荧光用作实时指导,以评估保留实质的肝切除术期间的手术切缘。在组织病理学分析过程中,所有CRLM周围荧光边缘完整的患者均进行了根治性切除。四名边缘突出或残留边缘图案的患者(8%)的切除边缘呈阳性。
    结论:ICG荧光成像可与其他常规术中成像技术结合,以优化术中分期。边缘荧光被证明是切除边缘的有效指标:通过去除整个荧光区域,实现肿瘤阴性切除(R0)。
    BACKGROUND: The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) recommends, with strong evidence, the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging combined with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) to improve identification of superficial liver tumors. This study reports the use of ICG for the detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) during minimally invasive liver resection.
    METHODS: A single-center consecutive series of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) hepatic resections for CRLMs was prospectively evaluated (April 2019 and October 2023).
    RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were enrolled-11 undergoing laparoscopic and 14 undergoing robotic procedures. The median age was 65 (range 50-85) years. Fifty CRLMs were detected: twenty superficial, eight exophytic, seven shallow (<8 mm from the hepatic surface), and fifteen deep (>10 mm from the hepatic surface) lesions. The detection rates of CRLMs through preoperative imaging, laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS), ICG fluorescence, and combined modalities (ICG and LUS) were 88%, 90%, 68%, and 100%, respectively. ICG fluorescence staining allowed us to detect five small additional superficial lesions (not identified with other preoperative/intraoperative techniques). However, two lesions were false positive fluorescence accumulations. All rim fluorescence pattern lesions were CRLMs. ICG fluorescence was used as a real-time guide to assess surgical margins during parenchymal-sparing liver resections. All patients with integrity of the fluorescent rim around the CRLM displayed a radical resection during histopathological analysis. Four patients (8%) with a protruding rim or residual rim patterns had positive resection margins.
    CONCLUSIONS: ICG fluorescence imaging can be integrated with other conventional intraoperative imaging techniques to optimize intraoperative staging. Rim fluorescence proved to be a valid indicator of the resection margins: by removing the entire fluorescent area, a tumor-negative resection (R0) is achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者的预后预测工具有限,CRLM患者术前新辅助化疗的标准仍存在争议。
    方法:本研究纳入2009年1月至2019年12月华西医院(WCH)的532例CRLM患者。从训练队列中确定预后因素,以构建WCH列线图并评估验证队列的准确性。使用接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线分析将预测准确性与其他现有预测工具进行比较。
    结果:根据对培训队列的分析,四个独立的预后危险因素,即肿瘤标志物评分,KRAS突变,原发性淋巴结转移,并确定了肿瘤负荷评分,并在此基础上构建了WCH列线图。两个队列的C指数分别为0.674(95%CI:0.634-0.713)和0.655(95%CI:0.586-0.723),分别,这比以前报告的预测分数(CRS,m-CS和游戏得分)。ROC曲线显示AUC预测1-,3-,训练队列中的5年总生存率(OS)为0.758、0.709和0.717,验证队列中的0.860、0.669和0.692,分别。根据5年OS的ROC曲线的最大Youden指数,获得WCH-列线图总分114.5分的截止值。危险分层显示低风险组的预后明显更好,然而,高危人群更有可能从新辅助化疗中获益.
    结论:与以前的评分系统相比,WCH列线图显示出更好的预后分层,有效识别可能从新辅助化疗中获益最大的CRLM患者。
    BACKGROUND: The prognostic predictive tool for patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is limited and the criteria for administering preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in CRLM patients remain controversial.
    METHODS: This study enrolled 532 CRLM patients at West China Hospital (WCH) from January 2009 to December 2019. Prognostic factors were identified from the training cohort to construct a WCH-nomogram and evaluating accuracy in the validation cohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the prediction accuracy with other existing prediction tools.
    RESULTS: From the analysis of the training cohort, four independent prognostic risk factors, namely tumor marker score, KRAS mutation, primary lymph node metastasis, and tumor burden score were identified on which a WCH-nomogram was constructed. The C-index of the two cohorts were 0.674 (95% CI: 0.634-0.713) and 0.655 (95% CI: 0.586-0.723), respectively, which was better than the previously reported predication scores (CRS, m-CS and GAME score). ROC curves showed AUCs for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 0.758, 0.709, and 0.717 in the training cohort, and 0.860, 0.669, and 0.692 in the validation cohort, respectively. A cutoff value of 114.5 points was obtained for the WCH-nomogram total score based on the maximum Youden index of the ROC curve of 5-year OS. Risk stratification showed significantly better prognosis in the low-risk group, however, the high-risk group was more likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The WCH-nomogram demonstrates superior prognostic stratification compared to prior scoring systems, effectively identifying CRLM patients who may benefit the most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结直肠癌是全球第三大常见癌症,肝脏是最常见的转移性疾病。肝脏微创手术的发病率越来越高,和机器人手术(RLR)被认为克服了腹腔镜方法(LRL)的一些局限性。我们对腹腔镜与机器人辅助肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的手术和短期肿瘤学结果进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。网上搜索PubMed,Embase,Scopus,并进行了Cochrane数据库。涉及3210名患者的8项研究被认为符合荟萃分析的条件。在LRL组中,与RLR(6.7%;p=<0.001)相比,观察到更高的打开率(12.4%)。LRL组30天死亡率为0.7%,而RLR组为0.5%(p=0.76)。LLR和RLR的长期死亡率为18.2%,而1年死亡率为8.0%(p=0.07),34.1%vs.2年死亡率为26.7%(p=0.13),和52.3%vs.3年死亡率为48.3%(p=0.46)。住院时间为5.6±2.5vs.5.8±2.1天,分别(p=0.47)。LRL和RLR组的个体并发症发生率之间没有显着差异(p=0.78)。腹腔镜或机器人方法治疗结直肠癌肝转移在安全性和有效性方面具有可比性。机器人手术有显著的优势,尽管仍然没有关于总体生存率的长期证据,并且使用RLR进行手术的患者数量仍然很少。
    Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the liver is the most common localization of metastatic disease. The incidence of minimally invasive liver surgery is increasing, and robotic surgery (RLR) is believed to overcome some limitations of a laparoscopic approach (LRL). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of the laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. An online search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases was performed. Eight studies involving 3210 patients were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. In the LRL group, a higher conversion to open rate (12.4%) was observed compared to the RLR (6.7%; p = <0.001). 30-day mortality was 0.7% for the LRL group compared to 0.5% for the RLR group (p = 0.76). Mortality in longer periods among LLR and RLR amounted to 18.2% vs. 8.0% for 1-year mortality (p = 0.07), 34.1% vs. 26.7% for 2-year mortality (p = 0.13), and 52.3% vs. 48.3% for 3-year mortality (p = 0.46). The length of hospital stay was 5.6 ± 2.5 vs. 5.8 ± 2.1 days, respectively (p = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the incidence of individual complications in the LRL and RLR groups (p = 0.78). Laparoscopic or robotic approaches for colorectal liver metastases are comparable in terms of safety and effectiveness. There are significant advantages to robotic surgery, although there is still no long-term evidence concerning overall survival, and the number of patients operated on using RLR remains small.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号