UNASSIGNED: This study comprehensively compared laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) to open liver resection (OLR) in treating colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM).
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of relevant literature was conducted to assess a range of crucial surgical and oncological outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Findings indicate that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) did not significantly prolong the duration of surgery compared to open liver resection and notably demonstrated lower blood transfusion rates and reduced intraoperative blood loss. While some studies favored MIS for its lower complication rates, others did not establish a statistically significant difference. One study identified a lower post-operative mortality rate in the MIS group. Furthermore, MIS consistently correlated with shorter hospital stays, indicative of expedited post-operative recovery. Concerning oncological outcomes, while certain meta-analyses reported a lower rate of cancer recurrence in the MIS group, others found no significant disparity. Overall survival and disease-free survival remained comparable between the MIS and open liver resection groups.
UNASSIGNED: The analysis emphasizes the potential advantages of LLR in terms of surgical outcomes and aligns with existing literature findings in this field.
UNASSIGNED: [website], identifier [registration number].

Surgical resection is the gold standard for treating synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions can follow different sequences: \"simultaneous\", \"bowel-first\", and \"liver-first\". Conservative approaches, such as parenchymal-sparing surgery and segmentectomy, may serve as alternatives to major hepatectomy. A comprehensive search of Medline, Epistemonikos, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies evaluating patients who underwent surgery for CRLM and reported survival results were included. Other secondary outcomes were analyzed, including disease-free survival, perioperative complications and mortality, and recurrence rates. Quality assessment was performed using the AMSTAR-2 method. No significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, and secondary outcomes were observed when comparing simultaneous to \"bowel-first\" resections, despite a higher rate of perioperative mortality in the former group. The 5-year OS was significantly higher for simultaneous resection compared to \"liver-first\" resection. No significant differences in OS and DFS were noted when comparing \"liver-first\" to \"bowel-first\" resection, or anatomic to non-anatomic resection. Our umbrella review validates simultaneous surgery as an effective oncological approach for treating SCRLM, though the increased risk of perioperative morbidity highlights the importance of selecting suitable patients. Non-anatomic resections might be favored to preserve liver function and enable future surgical interventions.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the liver is the most common localization of metastatic disease. The incidence of minimally invasive liver surgery is increasing, and robotic surgery (RLR) is believed to overcome some limitations of a laparoscopic approach (LRL). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of the laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. An online search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases was performed. Eight studies involving 3210 patients were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. In the LRL group, a higher conversion to open rate (12.4%) was observed compared to the RLR (6.7%; p = <0.001). 30-day mortality was 0.7% for the LRL group compared to 0.5% for the RLR group (p = 0.76). Mortality in longer periods among LLR and RLR amounted to 18.2% vs. 8.0% for 1-year mortality (p = 0.07), 34.1% vs. 26.7% for 2-year mortality (p = 0.13), and 52.3% vs. 48.3% for 3-year mortality (p = 0.46). The length of hospital stay was 5.6 ± 2.5 vs. 5.8 ± 2.1 days, respectively (p = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the incidence of individual complications in the LRL and RLR groups (p = 0.78). Laparoscopic or robotic approaches for colorectal liver metastases are comparable in terms of safety and effectiveness. There are significant advantages to robotic surgery, although there is still no long-term evidence concerning overall survival, and the number of patients operated on using RLR remains small.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal liver metastasis has a high incidence, and RAS oncogene mutation status carries significant prognostic information. We aimed to assess whether RAS-mutated patients present more or less frequently with positive margins in their hepatic metastasectomy.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Embase, and Lilacs databases. We analyzed liver metastatic colorectal cancer studies, which included information on RAS status and had surgical margin analysis of the liver metastasis. Odds ratios were computed using a random-effect model due to anticipated heterogeneity. We further performed a subanalysis limited to studies that included only patients with KRAS instead of all-RAS mutations.
RESULTS: From the 2,705 studies screened, 19 articles were included in the meta-analysis. There were 7,391 patients. The prevalence of positive resection margin was not significantly different between patients carrier vs non-carrier for the all-RAS mutations (OR .99; 95% CI 0.83-1.18; P = .87), and for only KRAS mutation (OR .93; 95% CI 0.73-1.19; P = .57).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the strong correlation between colorectal liver metastasis prognosis and RAS mutation status, our meta-analysis\'s results suggest no correlation between the RAS status and the prevalence of positive resection margins. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the RAS mutation\'s role in the surgical resections of colorectal liver metastasis.

The consumption of alcohol has long been associated with the development of liver disease as well as cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC). Leading healthcare concerns include the prevalent use of alcohol and the high burden of CRC mortality. Many CRC deaths are attributed to the development of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) as the liver is the foremost site of CRC spread. However, an association has not been defined for the role of alcohol intake and related liver injury with the development of CRLM. Here, a mapping review of recent research was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of CRLM. The literature search revealed 14 articles meeting the inclusion criteria that included patient database analyses and preclinical studies. Most of the human data analyses found alcohol use independently associates with worse CRC outcomes. The preclinical evaluations identified several pathways involved in the alcohol-mediated promotion of CRLM burden and CRC cell metastatic behavior. The limited number of studies identified exposes a significant need for more prospective analyses to define the role of alcohol intake and advanced CRC as well as the translation of preclinical research to fully characterize targetable mechanisms for the generation of new therapeutic options.

Microwave ablation (MWA) has become the standard thermal-based treatment for hepatic malignancies in patients who have unresectable disease based on the biology of the tumor, the patients\' comorbidities, and certain disease sites. The technical effectiveness, ablation success, local recurrence rates of hepatic malignancies treated with the various commercial microwave ablation devices has not been previously published in the peer reviewed literature. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the clinical outcomes for the various MWA devices in the use of a hepatic malignancies to best educate hepatic surgeons as well as interventional radiologists.
A comprehensive review of the literature and instructions for use of each device that was published from 1/2013 to 12/2020 was performed. The main outcomes extracted were technical success, ablation success, major complications, local and new recurrence rates, recurrence-free survival, ablation volumes, time, and the number of antennas required. A qualitative review of the literature was performed.
In total, 29 studies reporting data on 3250 patients and 4500 tumors were included in this review. Median patient age was 60.5 years (range 3-91). 76.3% (2420 M/753 F) of patients were male. Hepatocellular carcinoma (55%) was the most common tumor pathology followed by colorectal liver metastasis (10%) and cholangiocarcinoma (4%). A majority of studies reported technical success (range, 91.6-100%) and ablation success (range, 73.1-100%), as well as major complications (range, 0-9.1%). Local recurrence (range, 0-50%) was reported by 21 of the studies; however, new recurrence (range, 12.2-64%) was reported less frequently (6 studies) and were further specified in 12, six, and four studies as intrahepatic distant recurrence (11.3-54.2%), extrahepatic distant recurrence (3.6-20%), and metastasis (1.1-36%). A total of three, six, and five studies report disease, progression, and recurrence-free survival rates, respectively.
Microwave ablation is frequently used for the treatment of hepatic malignancies. A thorough understanding of the clinical outcomes associated with different pathologies and MWA devices can improve surgeon awareness and help prepare for operative planning and patient management. More consistent reporting of key outcomes in the literature is needed to achieve such an understanding.

Liver lesions located adjacent to the middle hepatic vein (MHV) at the hepatocaval confluence are rare. Mini-mesohepatectomy (MMH) allows resection of these lesions with preservation of liver parenchymal volume thus reducing the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). We evaluated our experience of MMH at our institution and assessed post-operative complications, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). All patients undergoing MMH at our institution were included in the study. Intra-operative parameters, histopathological data, DFS and OS were evaluated. 11 patients with colorectal liver metastasis underwent MMH between Jan 2012 and Dec 2020. MMH resulted in R0 resection rate in all patients with no PHLF. There were 1 post-operative bile leaks but no mortality following MMH. Median DFS was 13.5 months with OS being 60 months. MMH offers safe oncological resection of lesions at the MHV at the hepatocaval confluence and should be considered in patients presenting with such lesions.

(1) Background: colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the most common extra-lymphatic metastases in colorectal cancer; however, few patients are fit for curative surgery. Microwave ablation (MWA) showed promising outcomes in this cohort of patients. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed to analyze the oncological results of MWA for CRLM. (2) Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and the Wiley Online Library databases were searched for reports published before January 2021. We included papers assessing MWA, treating resectable CRLM with curative intention. We evaluated the reported MWA-related complications and oncological outcomes as being recurrence-free (RF), free from local recurrence (FFLR), and overall survival rates (OS). (3) Results: Twelve out of 4822 papers (395 patients) were finally included. Global RF rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 65.1%, 44.6%, and 34.3%, respectively. Global FFLR rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 96.3%, 89.6%, and 83.7%, respectively. Global OS at 1, 3, and 5 years were 86.7%, 59.6%, and 44.8%, respectively. A better FFLR was reached using the MWA surgical approach at 3, 6, and 12 months, with reported rates of 97.1%, 92.7%, and 88.6%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Surgical MWA treatment for CRLM smaller than 3 cm is a safe and valid option. This approach can be safely included for selected patients in the curative intent approaches to treating CRLM.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop metastases most commonly in the liver. Liver transplantation (LT) can be used in certain cases of primary liver malignancy or in metastatic diseases, such as Neuroendocrine tumors. However, there are controversies regarding LT as a treatment option for liver metastasis from CRC due to poor outcomes in previously reported cases.
METHODS: We report a 37-year-old male who underwent resection of the left-sided colon due to cancer and was found to have synchronous liver metastasis for which he received chemotherapy. Later, he underwent a right hepatectomy, which was complicated by insufficient liver remnant function despite the preserved liver perfusion. Therefore, salvage liver transplantation was performed successfully with a good long-term outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Many studies examined the survival and quality of life in patients undergoing liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis; these studies include the SECA Study (secondary cancer) and others with favorable outcomes. We reviewed the literature and compared the outcomes of some of these studies in this article. Our case emphasizes that liver transplantation could be an option for some colon cancer liver metastasis (CLM) patients, specifically, as a salvage procedure. Thus, more research is needed to develop selection criteria for patients who may benefit from liver transplantation.

The liver is frequently the most common site of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer, occurring in more than 50% of patients. While surgical resection remains the only potential curative option, it is only eligible in 15-20% of patients at presentation. In the past two decades, major advances in modern chemotherapy and personalized biological agents have improved overall survival in patients with unresectable liver metastasis. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies such as hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are treatment strategies which are increasingly being considered to improve local tumor response and to reduce systemic side effects. Currently, these therapies are mostly used in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. However, their use in the first-line setting in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy as well as to a lesser degree, in a neoadjuvant setting, for downstaging to resection have also been investigated. Furthermore, some clinicians have considered these therapies as a temporizing tool for local disease control in patients undergoing a chemotherapy \'holiday\' or acting as a bridge in patients between different lines of systemic treatment. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.